You are here

Amerika Birlesik Devletleri’nde Polis Örgütlerinin Suçla Mücadelesinde Kurumlar Arası Müdahale Agları

INTERORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSE NETWORKS IN FIGHTING AGAINST CRIME BY POLICE AGENCIES IN THE USA

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Interorganizational networks are increasingly used by local law enforcement agencies in response to crime in United States and elsewhere. Interorganizational networks help law enforcement to cope with the uncertainty of complex response operations in the local area by sharing information with other law enforcement agencies. While it is a developing field, its root in criminal justice is different from other public organizations. The study reviews the literature on networks (network theory) and implementation of the theory in law enforcement and interoperability issues were discussed. Florida Integrated Network for Data Exchange and Retrieval (FINDER) model was used as a case study for network model and information sharing in fight against crime.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kurumlar arası ag Amerika Birlesik Devletleri’ndeki yerel polis birimleri tarafından suçla mücadelede yaygınlasarak kullanılan bir yöntemdir. Yerel polis birimlerinin birbirleriyle bilgi paylasımıyla kurulan kurumlar arası ag, polisin karsılastıgı yetersiz bilgilenmeyi azaltmak amacıyla kullanılmaktadır. Gelisen bir alan olmasının yanında polis uygulaması ile diger kamu kurumlarının uygulaması farklılıklar göstermektedir. Bu çalısmada, teorinin gelisimi, polis tarafından uygulanması ve teorinin uygulanabilirligi konuları tartısılmaktadır. Florida Dahili Bilgi Paylasımı Agı (FINDER) modeli ise teorinin uygulanısına bir örnek olarak incelenmistir.
47-72

REFERENCES

References: 

Abadinsky, Howard, (2003), Organized Crime, Belmont: Wadsworth
Publishing, 7. Edition.
Bailey, Darlyne and Koney, Kelly Mcnally, (2000), Strategic Alliances
among Health and Human Service Organizations, From Affiliations
to Consolidations, California: Sage Publications Inc. Thousand Oaks.
Barabasi, Albert-László, (2002), Linked: The New Science of Networks,
Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.
Bardach, Eugene, (2001), “Developmental dynamics: Interagency
collaboration as an emergent phenomenon”, Journal of Public
Administration Research and Theory, 11/2, pp.149−164.
Bruinsma, Gerben and Bernasco, Wim, (2004), “Criminal Groups and
Transnational Illegal Markets: A More Detailed Examination On The
Basis of Social Network Theory”, Crime, Law & Social Change, 41,
pp.79–94.
Burt, Ronald S., (2000), “The Network Structure of Social Capital”, in R.
Sutton & B. Staw (Eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior,
Westport: CT. JAI Press.
Carley, Kathleen M. and Harrald, John R., (1997), “Organizational
Learning under Fire, Theory and Practice”, American Behavioral
Scientist, 40/3, pp.310-332.
Chisholm, Rupert F., (1998), Developing Network Organizations:
Learning from Practice and Theory, New York: Addison - Wesley
Publishing.
Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance (DOJ), (2002),
Mission Possible: Strong Governance Structures for the Integration of
Justice Information Systems. Retrieved on November 21, 2007 from
http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/192278.pdf
Eglene, O'neill; Dawes, Sharon S. and Schnider, Christian A., (2007),
“Authority and Leadership Patterns in Public Sector Knowledge
Networks,” The American Review of Public Administration, 37/1,
pp.91-113.
Interorganizational Response Networks in Fighting Against Crime by Police
Agencies in the USA
69
Fedorowicz, Jane; Gogan, Janis L. and Williams, Christine B., (2007),
“A Collaborative Network for First Responders: Lessons from the
CapWIN case”, Government Information Quarterly, 24, pp.785–807.
Field, John, (2003), Social Capital, New York: Routledge.
Finder Guide, (2007), “Law Enforcement Data Sharing Consortium
Information Guide”, Retrieved on November 21, 2007 from
http://finder.ucf.edu/Documents/tabid/64/Default.aspx.
Fountain, Jane E., (2001), Building the Virtual State: Information
technology and Institutional Change, Chapter 5, Washington DC:
Brookings Intuition Press. pp. 64-82.
Granovetter, Mark S., (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American
Journal of Sociology, 78, pp.1360-1380.
Gray, Barbara, (1989), Collaborating, San Francisco: Jossey_bass Inc.
Guijarro, Luis G., (2004), “Analysis of the Interoperability Frameworks
in e-Government Initiatives”, R Traunmuller (Ed.) EGOV 2004,
LNCS 3183. pp. 36-39
Gulati, Ranjay and Gargiulo, Martin, (1999), “Where Do
Interorganizational Networks Come From?,” AJS, 104/5, pp.1439–
93.
Halpern, David, (2005), Social Capital, Malden: Polity Press.
Hert, Paul De and Gutwirth, Serge, (2006), “Interoperability of Police
Databases within the EU: An Accountable Political Choice?,”
International Review of Law Computers & Technology, 20/1&2,
pp.21–35.
Hughes, Lorine A., (2005), “Studying Youth Gangs: Alternative Methods
and Conclusions”, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21/2,
pp.98-119.
Jian, Wen-Shan; Hsu, Chien-Yeh; Hao, Te-Hui; Wen, Hsyien-Chia; Hsu,
Min-Huei; Lee, Yen-Liang and Li, Yu-Chuan, (2007), “Building A
Portable Data And Information Interoperability Infrastructure-
Framework For A Standard Taiwan Electronic Medical Record
Template”, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 88,
pp.102–111.
70 Polis Bilimleri Dergisi: 11 (1)
Kapucu, Naim, (2005), “Interorganizational Coordination in Dynamic
Context: Networks in Emergency Response Management,”
Connections, 26/2, pp.33-48.
Kapucu, Naim, (2006a), “Public-Nonprofit Partnerships for Collective
Action in Dynamic Contexts of Emergencies,” Public
Administration, 84/1, pp.205-220.
Kapucu, Naim, (2006b), “Interagency Communication Networks During
Emergencies: Boundary Spanners in Multiagency Coordination,”
American Review of Public Administration, 36/2, pp.207-225.
Katz, Nancy and Lazer, David, (2007), Building Effective Intra-
Organizational Networks: The Role of Teams, Retrieved on
November 25, 2007 from www.ksg.harvard.edu/ davidlazer/files/
papers/Lazer_Katz_Building_Effective.pdf.
Keast, Robyn; Mandell, Myrna P.; Brown, Kerry and Woolcock,
Geoffrey, (2004), “Network Structures: Working Differently and
Changing Expectations,” Public Administration Review, 64/3.
Kelly, Robert J.; Smith, Eugene F.; Maghan, Jess and Serio, Joseph,
(2005), Illicit Trafficking, Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO Inc.
Kenney, Michael, (2007), From Pablo to Osama: Trafficking and
Terrorist Networks, Government Bureaucracies, and Competitive
Adaptation, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Kubicek, Herbert and Cimander, Ralf, (2005), “Interoperability in
Government. A Survey On Information Needs of Different EU
Stakeholders”, European Review of Political Technologies, 3:1–17,
Retrieved on November 22, 2007 from http://www.politechinstitute.
org/review/articles/KUBICEK_Herbert_&_CIMANDER_Ra
lf_volume_3.pdf.
Mandell, Myrna and Keast, Robyn, (2007), “Evaluating Network
Arrangements toward Revised Performance Measures,” Public
Performance & Management Review, 30/4, pp.574–597.
Mcallister, Brad, (2004), “Al Qaeda and the Innovative Firm:
Demythologizing the Network,” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 27,
pp.297–319.
Interorganizational Response Networks in Fighting Against Crime by Police
Agencies in the USA
71
Milward, H. Brinton and Provan, Keith G., (2006), “A Manager’s Guide
to Choosing and Using Collaborative Networks,” Report published
by the IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington,
DC.
Milward, H. Brinton and Raab, Jörg, (2002), “Dark Networks: The
Structure, Operation, and Performance of International Drug, Terror,
and Arms Trafficking Networks,” Paper presented at the International
Conference on the Empirical Study of Governance, Management, and
Performance Barcelona, Spain, 4-5 October 2002.
Moynihan, Donald P., (2005), “Leveraging Collaborative Networks in
Infrequent Emergency Situation,” Washington DC: IBM the Center
for the Business of Government.
http://www.businessofgovernment.com/pdfs/MoynihanReport.pdf
[accessed online on January 23, 2008].
Mowbray, Thomas J. and Zahavi, Ron, (1995), The Essential CORBA:
Systems Integration Using Distributed Objects. New York: John
Valley & Sons
Provan, Keith G. and Milward, H. Brinton, (2001), “Do Networks Really
Work? A Framework for Evvaluationg Public-sector Organizational
Networks,” Public Administration Review, 61, pp.414-423.
Provan, Keith G. and Milward, H. Brinton, (2004), “Cooperation and
Compromise: A Network Response to Conflicting Institutional
Pressures in Community Mental Health, Nonprofit and Voluntary
Sector,” Quarterly, 33/ 3.
Provan, Keith G.; Veazie, Mark A.; Staten, Lisa K. and Teufel-Shone,
Nicolette I. (2005), “The Use of Network Analysis to Strengthen
Community Partnerships,” Public Administration Review, 65/5.
Rottman, Joseph W.; Smith, L. Douglas; Long, David A. and Crofts,
Chuck, (2007), “Implementing Judicial Management Systems Within
an Integrated Justice Information Framework A Case Study on
Information Systems Development in the Public Sector,” The
American Review of Public Administration, 37/ 4, pp.436-457.
Scott, W. Richard, (2003), Organizations; Rational, Natural, and Open
Systems, Fifth Edition, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
72 Polis Bilimleri Dergisi: 11 (1)
Williams, Trevor, (2005), “Cooperation by Design: Structure and
Cooperation in Interorganizational Networks,” Journal of Business
Research, 58, pp.223– 231.
Yıldız, Mete, (2007), “E-government research: Reviewing the literature,
limitations, and ways forward”, Government Information Quarterly,
24, pp.646-665.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com