1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Economics
  4. Volume 11, 2019
  5. Article

Annual Review of Economics

Volume 11, 2019

Universal Basic Income in the Developing World

Abstract

Should developing countries give all of their citizens enough money to live on? Interest in this idea has grown enormously in recent years, reflecting both positive results from a number of existing cash transfer programs and dissatisfaction with the perceived limitations of piecemeal, targeted approaches to reducing extreme poverty. We discuss what we know (and what we do not) about three questions: what recipients would likely do with the incremental income, whether this would unlock further economic growth, and whether giving the money to everyone (as opposed to targeting it) would be wise.

Keyword(s): basic income, cash transfers, JEL I31, JEL I38, JEL O1
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030229
2019-08-02
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/11/1/annurev-economics-080218-030229.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030229&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Akresh R, De Walque D, Kazianga H 2016. Evidence from a randomized evaluation of the household welfare impacts of conditional and unconditional cash transfers given to mothers or fathers Work. Pap. 7730, World Bank, Washington, DC
  2. Alatas V, Banerjee A, Hanna R, Olken B, Tobias J 2012. Targeting the poor: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:1206–40
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alfaro L, Charlton A, Kanczuk F 2008. Plant-size distribution and cross-country income differences NBER Work. Pap. 14060
  4. Anderson S, Baland JM 2002. The economics of ROSCAs and intrahousehold resource allocation. Q. J. Econ. 117:963–95
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Angelucci M, De Giorgi G 2009. Indirect effects of an aid program: How do cash transfers affect ineligibles’ consumption. Am. Econ. Rev. 99486–508
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baird S, McIntosh C, Özler B 2011. Cash or condition? Evidence from a cash transfer experiment. Q. J. Econ. 126:1709–53
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Baird S, McIntosh C, Özler B 2013. The regressive demands of demand-driven development. J. Public Econ. 106:27–41
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Balboni C, Bandiera O, Burgess R, Ghatak M, Heil A 2019. Why do people stay poor? Tech. Rep., London School Econ.
  9. Bandiera O, Burgess R, Das N, Gulesci S, Rasul I, Sulaiman M 2017. Labor markets and poverty in village economies. Q. J. Econ. 132:811–70
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Banerjee A 2003. Contracting constraints, credit markets, and economic development. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications 3 M Dewatripont, LP Hansen, S Turnovsky1–46 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Banerjee A, Breza E, Duflo E, Kinnan C 2017a. Do credit constraints limit entrepreneurship? Heterogeneity in the returns to microfinance Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA
  12. Banerjee A, Duflo E 2005. Growth theory through the lens of development economics. Handbook of Economic Growth 1A P Aghion, S Durlauf473–552 Amsterdam: Elsevier 1st ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Banerjee A, Duflo E 2012. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty New York: PublicAffairs
  14. Banerjee A, Duflo E, Chattopadhyay R, Shapiro J 2016. The long term impacts of a “graduation” program: evidence from west Bengal Tech. Rep., MIT, Cambridge, MA
  15. Banerjee A, Hanna R, Kreindler G, Olken B 2017b. Debunking the stereotype of the lazy welfare recipient: evidence from cash transfer programs. World Bank Res. Obs. 32:155–84
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Banerjee A, Hanna R, Olken BA, Sumarto S 2018. The (lack of) distortionary effects of proxy-means tests: results from a nationwide experiment in Indonesia NBER Work. Pap. 25362
  17. Banerjee A, Hanna R, Olken B, Sumarto S 2019. Private outsourcing and competition: subsidized food distribution in Indonesia. J. Political Econ. 127:1101–13
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Banerjee A, Karlan D, Zinman J 2015. Six randomized evaluations of microcredit: introduction and further steps. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 7:1–21
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Banerjee A, Mullainathan S 2008. Limited attention and income distribution. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:489–93
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Banerjee A, Mullainathan S 2010. The shape of temptation: implications for the economic lives of the poor NBER Work. Pap. 15973
  21. Barrientos A 2010. Protecting capability, eradicating extreme poverty: Chile Solidario and the future of social protection. J. Hum. Dev. Capab. 11:579–97
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bartelsman E, Haltiwanger J, Scarpetta S 2008. Cross country differences in productivity: the role of allocative efficiency. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:1305–31
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Basic Income Earth Netw 2016. Setback for basic income movement in Namibia. Basic Income News31 https://basicincome.org/news/2016/05/setback-for-basic-income-movement-in-namibia/
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Bastagli F, Hagen-Zanker J, Harman L, Barca V, Sturge G et al. 2016. Cash transfers: What does the evidence say? A rigorous review of programme impact and of the role of design and implementation features Tech. Rep., Overseas Dev. Inst., London
  25. Baulch B, Hoddinott J 2000. Economic mobility and poverty dynamics in developing countries. J. Dev. Stud. 36:1–24
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Beegle K, Weerdt JD, Friedman J, Gibson J 2012. Methods of household consumption measurement through surveys: experimental results from Tanzania. J. Dev. Econ. 98:3–18
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Benhassine N, Devoto F, Duflo E, Dupas P, Pouliquen V 2015. Turning a shove into a nudge? A “labeled cash transfer” for education. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 7:86–125
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Berge LIO, Bjorvatn K, Tungodden B 2015. Human and financial capital for microenterprise development: evidence from a field and lab experiment. Manag. Sci. 61:707–22
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Bernard T, Dercon S, Orkin K, Taffesse A 2018. The future in mind: short- and long-run impact of an aspirations intervention in rural Ethiopia Work. Pap., Oxford Univ., Oxford, UK
  30. Besley T, Kanbur R 1990. The principles of targeting. Current Issues in Development Economies VN Balasubramanyan, S Lall69–90 New York: Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Binswanger HP 1980. Attitudes toward risk: experimental measurement in rural India. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 62:395–407
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Blattman C, Fiala N, Martinez S 2014. Generating skilled self-employment in developing countries: experimental evidence from Uganda. Q. J. Econ. 129:697–752
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Blattman C, Fiala N, Martinez S 2018. The long term impacts of grants on poverty: 9-year evidence from Uganda's Youth Opportunities Program NBER Work. Pap. 24999
  34. Boozer M, Goldstein M, Suri T 2009. Household information: implications for poverty measurement and dynamics Paper presented at the Summer 2009 Workshop, Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics, Palo Alto, CA, Aug. 13
  35. Brown C, Ravallion M, van de Walle D 2016. A poor means test? Econometric targeting in Africa NBER Work. Pap. 22919
  36. Brown C, Ravallion M, van de Walle D 2017. Are poor individuals mainly found in poor households? Evidence using nutrition data for Africa NBER Work. Pap. 24047
  37. Brudevold-Newman MH, Jakiela P, Ozier O 2017. A firm of one's own: experimental evidence on credit constraints and occupational choice Work. Pap. 7977, World Bank, Washington, DC
  38. Bryan G, Chowdhury S, Mobarak AM 2014. Underinvestment in a profitable technology: the case of seasonal migration in Bangladesh. Econometrica 82:1671–748
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Buera F, Kaboski JP, Shin Y 2011. Finance and development: a tale of two sectors. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:51964–2002
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Cai J 2016. The impact of insurance provision on household production and financial decisions. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 8:44–88
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Cai J, De Janvry A, Sadoulet E 2015. Social networks and the decision to insure. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 7:81–108
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Casaburi L, Macchiavello R 2019. Demand and supply of infrequent payments as a commitment device: Evidence from Kenya. Am. Econ. Rev. 109:523–55
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Casamatta G, Cremer H, Pestieau P 2000. Political sustainability and the design of social insurance. J. Public Econ. 75:341–64
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Chiappori PA, Donni O 2009. Non-unitary models of household behavior: a survey of the literature Discuss. Pap. 4603, Inst. Study Labor, Bonn, Ger.
  45. Christian C, Hensel L, Roth C 2019. Income shocks and suicides: causal evidence from Indonesia. Rev. Econ. Stat. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00777
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  46. Cole SA, Xiong W 2017. Agricultural insurance and economic development. Annu. Rev. Econ. 9:235–62
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Cremer H, Roeder K 2015. Means testing versus basic income: the (lack of) political support for a universal allowance. Econ. Lett. 136:81–84
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Cunha JM, De Giorgi G, Jayachandran S 2019. The price effects of cash versus in-kind transfers. Rev. Econ. Stud. 86:240–81
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Davala S, Jhaybala R, Standing G, Mehta SK 2015. Basic Income: A Transformative Policy for India. New York: Bloomsbury Acad
  50. de Mel S, McKenzie D, Woodruff C 2008. Returns to capital in microenterprises: evidence from a field experiment. Q. J. Econ. 123:1329–72
     [Google Scholar]
  51. De Vreyer P, Lambert S 2016. Intra-household inequalities and poverty in Senegal Unpublished manuscript, World Bank, Washington, DC
  52. Dreèze J, Khera R 2010. The BPL census and a possible alternative. Econ. Political Wkly. 45:54–63
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Duflo E 2000. Grandmothers and granddaughters: old age pension and intra-household allocation in South Africa NBER Work. Pap. 8061
  54. Egger D, Haushofer J, Miguel E, Niehaus P, Walker M 2018. General equilibrium effects of cash transfers in Kenya Pre-analysis plan, Am. Econ. Assoc., Nashville, TN
  55. Evans DK, Popova A 2017. Cash transfers and temptation goods. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 65:189–221
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Fafchamps M, McKenzie D, Quinn S, Woodruff C 2014. Microenterprise growth and the flypaper effect: evidence from a randomized experiment in Ghana. J. Dev. Econ. 106:211–26
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Gertler PJ, Martinez SW, Rubio-Codina M 2012. Investing cash transfers to raise long-term living standards. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 4:164–92
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Ghatak M, Maniquet F 2019. Universal basic income: some theoretical aspects. Annu. Rev. Econ. 11895–928
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Gordon R, Li W 2009. Tax structures in developing countries: many puzzles and a possible explanation. J. Public Econ. 93:855–66
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Grosh M, del Ninno C, Tesliuc E, Ouerghi A 2008. For Promotion and Protection: The Design and Implementation of Effective Safety Nets Washington, DC: World Bank
  61. Haarmann C, Haarmann D, Jauch H, Shindondola-Mote H, Nattrass N et al. 2009. Making the difference! The BIG in Namibia—Basic Income Grant pilot project Rep., Basic Income Grant Coalit., Windhoek, Namibia
  62. Handa S, Natali L, Seidenfeld D, Tembo G, Davis B 2016. Can unconditional cash transfers lead to sustainable poverty reduction? Evidence from two government-led programmes in Zambia Work. Pap. 2016–21, UNICEF Off. Res., Florence, Italy
  63. Hanna R, Olken B 2018. Universal basic incomes vs. targeted transfers: anti-poverty programs in developing countries. J. Econ. Perspect. 32:4201–26
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Haushofer J, Shapiro J 2013. Household response to income changes: evidence from an unconditional cash transfer program in Kenya Unpublished manuscript, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ
  65. Haushofer J, Shapiro J 2018. The long-term impact of unconditional cash transfers: experimental evidence from Kenya Work. Pap., Busara Cent. Behav. Econ., Nairobi, Kenya
  66. Hicks JH, Kleemans M, Li NY, Miguel E 2017. Reevaluating agricultural productivity gaps with longitudinal microdata NBER Work. Pap. 23253
  67. Hidrobo M, Peterman A, Heise L 2016. The effect of cash, vouchers, and food transfers on intimate partner violence: evidence from a randomized experiment in northern Ecuador. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 8:284–303
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Hoynes H, Rothstein J 2019. Universal basic income in the United States and advanced countries. Annu. Rev. Econ. 11929–58
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Hsieh CT, Klenow PJ 2009. Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Q. J. Econ. 124:1403–48
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Hsieh CT, Klenow PJ 2014. The life cycle of plants in India and Mexico. Q. J. Econ. 129:1035–84
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Hussam R, Rigol N, Roth B 2017. Targeting high ability entrepreneurs using community information: mechanism design in the field Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Bus. School, Cambridge, UK
  72. Ikiara G 2009. Political economy of cash transfers in Kenya Tech. Rep., Overseas Dev. Inst., London
  73. Imbert C, Papp J 2019. Short-term migration, rural public works and urban labor markets: evidence from India. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvz009
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. Ivaschenko O, Alas CR, Novikova M, Romero C, Bowen T, Zhu L 2018. The State of Social Safety Nets 2018 Washington, DC: World Bank
  75. Jayne T, Strauss J, Yamano T, Molla D 2002. Targeting of food aid in rural Ethiopia: chronic need or inertia. J. Dev. Econ. 68247–88
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Jeong H, Townsend R 2007. Sources of TFP growth: occupational choice and financial deepening. Econ. Theory 32:179–221
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Karlan D, Knight R, Udry C 2015. Consulting and capital experiments with microenterprise tailors in Ghana. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 118:281–302
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Karlan D, Osei R, Osei-Akoto I, Udry C 2014. Agricultural decisions after relaxing credit and risk constraints. Q. J. Econ. 129:597–652
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Kidd S, Gelders B, Bailey-Athias D 2017. Exclusion by design: an assessment of the effectiveness of the proxy means test poverty targeting mechanism Work. Pap. 56, Int. Labour Off., Geneva
  80. Kidd S, Wylde E 2011. Targeting the poorest: an assessment of the proxy means test methodology Tech. Rep., Aust. Agency Int. Dev., Canberra
  81. Klasen S, Lange S 2016. How narrowly should anti-poverty programs be targeted? Simulation evidence from Bolivia and Indonesia Discuss. Pap. 213, Courant Res. Cent., Göttingen, Ger.
  82. Lybbert T, Wydick B 2018. Poverty, aspirations, and the economics of hope. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 66:709–53
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Mani A, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zhao J 2013. Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science 341:976–80
     [Google Scholar]
  84. McIntosh C, Zeitlin A 2018. Using household grants to benchmark the cost effectiveness of USAID programming Pre-analysis plan, Am. Econ. Assoc., Nashville, TN
  85. McKenzie D, Woodruff C 2008. Experimental evidence on returns to capital and access to finance in Mexico. World Bank Econ. Rev. 22:457–82
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Meager R 2016. Aggregating distributional treatment effects: a Bayesian hierarchical analysis of the microcredit literature Unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, MA
  87. Minist. Finance 2017. Economic Survey 2016–17 Minist. Finance, Gov. India, New Delhi
  88. Mobarak AM, Rosenzweig M 2013. Labor market effects of selling rainfall insurance to cultivators and landless laborers Work. Pap., Yale Univ., New Haven, CT
  89. Moore C 2009. Nicaragua's Red de Proteccion Social: an exemplary but short-lived conditional cash transfer programme Rep. 17, Int. Policy Cent. Incl. Growth, Brasilia
  90. Morduch J 1990. Risk, production and saving: theory and evidence from Indian households Unpublished manuscript, New York Univ.
  91. Mullainathan S, Shafir E 2013. Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means so Much New York: Henry Holt Co.
  92. Niehaus P, Atanassova A, Bertrand M, Mullainathan S 2013. Targeting with agents. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 5:206–38
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Prather L 2017. The instrumental determinants of foreign aid support in donor countries Tech. Rep., Univ. Calif., San Diego
  94. Ravallion M 2016. The Economics of Poverty: History, Measurement and Policy Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  95. Restuccia D, Rogerson R 2008. Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with heterogeneous establishments. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 11:707–20
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Rosenzweig M, Wolpin K 1993. Credit market constraints, consumption smoothing, and the accumulation of durable production assets in low-income countries: investments in bullocks in India. J. Political Econ. 101:223–44
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Rosenzweig MR, Stark O 1989. Consumption smoothing, migration, and marriage: evidence from rural India. J. Political Econ. 97:905–26
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Salehi-Isfahani D, Mostafavi-Dehzooei M 2017. Cash transfers and labor supply: evidence from a large-scale program in Iran Work. Pap. 1090, Econ. Res. Forum, Giza, Egypt
  99. SEWA Bharat 2014. A little more, how much it is... Piloting basic income transfers in Madhya Pradesh, India Rep., SEWA Bharat, New Delhi
  100. Silverio-Murillo A 2018. Wife vs. husband: Does it matter who answers the survey? Tech. Rep., Univ. Minn., Minneapolis
  101. Stecklov G, Weinreb A, Carletto C 2018. Can incentives improve survey data quality in developing countries? Results from a field experiment in India. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 181:1033–56
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Sukhtankar S 2016. India's national rural employment guarantee scheme: What do we really know about the world's largest workfare program. Proceedings of the Brookings-NCAER India Policy Forum 13231–86 Natl. Counc. Appl. Econ. Res. New Delhi:
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Suri T, Jack W 2016. The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science 354:1288–92
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Talbot T, Collin M 2016. Using aid for cash transfers: What do 10,000 people in 28 countries think? Rep., Cent. Global Dev. Washington, DC: https://www.cgdev.org/blog/what-do-10000-people-28-countries-think-using-aid-cash-transfers
  105. Townsend RM 1995. Consumption insurance: an evaluation of risk-bearing systems in low-income economies. J. Econ. Perspect. 9:83–102
     [Google Scholar]
  106. van Ufford PQ, Harland C, Michelo S, Tembo G, Toole K, Wood D 2016. The role of impact evaluation in the evolution of Zambia's cash transfer programme. From Evidence to Action: The Story of Cash Transfers and Impact Evaluation in Sub-Saharan Africa B Davis, S Handa, N Hypher, NW Rossi, P Winters, J Yablonski197–225 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Walker M 2018. Informal taxation and cash transfers: experimental evidence from Kenya Tech. Rep., Univ. Calif., Berkeley
  108. Widerquist K 2018. The devil's in the caveats: a critical analysis of basic income experiments for researchers, policymakers, and citizens. CESifo Forum 19:330–35
     [Google Scholar]
  109. World Bank 2019. Tax revenue. Time Ser., updated Jan. 24 https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Yoong J, Rabinovich L, Diepeveen S 2012. The impact of economic resource transfers to women versus men: a systematic review Tech. Rep., Univ. London
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030229
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error