| Count | Response |
|---|---|
| 1 | JAIRAM.SUJITH-YARRAM@CAPGEMINI.COM |
| 1 | abbidi.sai-ranadheer-reddy@capgemini.com |
| 1 | abhilash.vemualamada@capgemini.com |
| 1 | akhil-raj.polampally@capgemini.com |
| 1 | aswathy.kumar@capgemini.com |
| 1 | avadhanula.phani-sarvani@capgemini.com |
| 1 | chinnu.s@capgemini.com |
| 1 | divya.k.s@capgemini.com |
| 1 | greeshma.srungavarapu@capgemini.com |
| 1 | haritha.podila@capgemini.com |
| 1 | jhnana-venkata.lakshman-nanduri@capgemini.com |
| 1 | lakshmi-prasanna.m@capgemini.com |
| 1 | mahalaxmi.k@capgemini.com |
| 1 | manavi.n-d@capgemini.com |
| 1 | pandu-sai-lakshmi-prasanna.gajula@capgemini.com |
| 1 | pavan.sai-marripudagala@capgemini.com |
| 1 | phanibabu.pamarthi@capgemini.com |
| 1 | praneetha.kethireddy@capgemini.com |
| 1 | praveen.as.kuamr@capgemini.com |
| 1 | priyanka.mettu@capgemini.com |
| 1 | sasidhar.reddy-gajjala@capgemini.com |
| 1 | sindhu.poloju@capgemini.com |
| 1 | sowmya.nagendla@capgemini.com |
| 1 | sravana.sandhya-addula@capgemini.com |
| Count | Response |
|---|---|
| 1 | 100418_FS |
| 1 | 111141_FS |
| 1 | 111142_FS |
| 1 | 111145_FS |
| 1 | 112251_FS |
| 1 | 112252_IN |
| 1 | 112253_IN |
| 1 | 112254_IN |
| 1 | 112255_FS |
| 1 | 112256_FS |
| 1 | 112257_FS |
| 1 | 112258_IN |
| 1 | 112259_FS |
| 1 | 112260_FS |
| 1 | 112261_FS |
| 1 | 112262_IN |
| 1 | 112263_FS |
| 1 | 112264 |
| 1 | 112265_IN |
| 1 | 112266_FS |
| 1 | 112267_FS |
| 1 | 112268_FS |
| 1 | 112269_FS |
| 1 | 112270_FS |
| Count | Response |
|---|---|
| 3 | CHENNAI |
| 1 | CHENNAI(PCT) |
| 1 | CHENNAI-PCT |
| 1 | Chennai |
| 1 | Chennai(PCT),India |
| 5 | Chennai,India |
| 4 | INDIA |
| 3 | India |
| 1 | PCT, CHENNAI, INDIA |
| 1 | PCT,Chennai,India |
| 2 | chennai |
| 1 | chennai,india |
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree | Average | Responses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The facilitator knew the subject well. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
1
4.17% |
11
45.83% |
12
50.00% |
4.46 | 24 |
| The facilitator was prepared and organized for the class. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
3
12.50% |
12
50.00% |
9
37.50% |
4.25 | 24 |
| We were encouraged to participate in class discussions and were actively engaged. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
1
4.17% |
9
37.50% |
14
58.33% |
4.54 | 24 |
| The facilitator was responsive to participants' needs and questions. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
4
16.67% |
14
58.33% |
6
25.00% |
4.08 | 24 |
| We discussed on-the-job application of what we learned during the class. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
12
50.00% |
12
50.00% |
4.50 | 24 |
| Average % | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.50% | 48.33% | 44.17% | 4.37 | 120 |
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree | Average | Responses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The facilitator knew the subject well. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
5
20.83% |
19
79.17% |
4.79 | 24 |
| The facilitator was prepared and organized for the class. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
9
37.50% |
15
62.50% |
4.63 | 24 |
| We were encouraged to participate in class discussions and were actively engaged. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
7
29.17% |
17
70.83% |
4.71 | 24 |
| The facilitator was responsive to participants' needs and questions. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
7
29.17% |
17
70.83% |
4.71 | 24 |
| We discussed on-the-job application of what we learned during the class. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
1
4.17% |
8
33.33% |
15
62.50% |
4.58 | 24 |
| Average % | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.83% | 30.00% | 69.17% | 4.68 | 120 |
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree | Average | Responses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The physical environment/technology was conducive to learning. | 1
4.35% |
0
0.00% |
3
13.04% |
12
52.17% |
7
30.43% |
4.04 | 23 |
| Average % | 4.35% | 0.00% | 13.04% | 52.17% | 30.43% | 4.04 | 23 |
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree | Average | Responses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The scope of the material was appropriate and met my needs. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
1
4.17% |
13
54.17% |
10
41.67% |
4.38 | 24 |
| The material was organized logically. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
4
16.67% |
13
54.17% |
7
29.17% |
4.13 | 24 |
| The examples helped me understand the content. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
13
54.17% |
11
45.83% |
4.46 | 24 |
| The take-aways (presentation files, handouts, manuals etc) will be useful on the job. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
1
4.17% |
13
54.17% |
10
41.67% |
4.38 | 24 |
| Average % | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.25% | 54.17% | 39.58% | 4.34 | 96 |
| Value | Percent | Count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disagree | 0.00% |
|
0 |
| Neutral | 4.17% |
|
1 |
| Agree | 95.83% |
|
23 |
| Totals | 24 | ||
| Statistics | |
|---|---|
| Sum | 71.00 |
| Average | 2.96 |
| StdDev | 0.20 |
| Max | 3.00 |
| 0% | 10% | 20% | 30% | 40% | 50% | 60% | 70% | 80% | 90% | 100% | Average | Responses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| My knowledge/skill level of the content has increased after the training. | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
3
12.50% |
13
54.17% |
7
29.17% |
1
4.17% |
0.00 | 24 |
| I will be able to retain/apply what we learned in class | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
4
16.67% |
8
33.33% |
9
37.50% |
3
12.50% |
0.00 | 24 |
| Average % | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.58% | 43.75% | 33.33% | 8.33% | 0.00 | 48 |
| Value | Percent | Count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediately | 91.67% |
|
22 |
| Next 30 days | 4.17% |
|
1 |
| Next 90 days | 0.00% |
|
0 |
| Unsure... | 4.17% |
|
1 |
| Totals | 24 | ||
| Count | Response |
|---|---|
| 1 | A BETTER PRACTICAL SESSION FOR IMPORTANT TOPICS |
| 1 | As a fresher this is the new core banking software(technology) i learned. |
| 1 | As a part of a team, I learned how to work in a team environment. |
| 1 | As it is a new tool to learn for me . I had learnt the technology well. |
| 1 | How exactly the banking is. |
| 1 | I Learnt to work in a team. |
| 1 | Learned Many things in T24 and interacting with friends. |
| 1 | Learned a lot about banking domain. |
| 1 | This technology is very new to me. As so every topics which I've learned is very useful. |
| 1 | got know about the banking application good learning environment and material |
| 1 | hands on,improved communication and team learning. |
| 1 | team work |
| 1 | we came to know many things like many examples which are not there in the course material,some extra topics related to our course |
| 1 | Banking domain knowledge about how different banking segments operate across customers, products, services & technology. |
| 1 | Have learnt the T24 product in a depth knowledge and was able to relate it to the real time scenario and understand the bank requirements. And learnt to transfer the knowledge to the colleagues. |
| 1 | All concepts of t24,extra topics like accounting tables and how to view the tables and check the codes. |
| Count | Response |
|---|---|
| 1 | After attending the class we will do recap session so that we wont forget the topics |
| 1 | By putting my own efforts, i gain more knowledge on the subject. |
| 1 | I have gained knowledge of T24 with self learning. |
| 1 | I want to appply the things in projects whatever i have learned in the class. |
| 1 | I will practice more and will become thorough |
| 1 | IAM ABLE TO PERFORM ALL TOPICS UP TO THE MARK. |
| 1 | It made me improve presentation skills |
| 1 | Relating everything to the technology and making the subject more easier. |
| 1 | Start creating new applications differently and more flexibly. |
| 1 | practicing handson. |
| 1 | put more efforts to gain some more knowledge about the topics. |
| 1 | revise the topics by comparing with the examples. |
| 1 | start doing to listen and class and take notes stop doing to look at other things. |
| 1 | I will try to create atleast one subroutine of my own daily so that i can improve my infobasic programming skills. |
| 1 | After this training, with the adequate knowledge in T24, i can think on my own to break down the requirement and get to the solution. |
| 1 | I will practically implement the things,which i have learned in the training environment to get the live exposure of the flow which is happening internally |
| Count | Response |
|---|---|
| 1 | By adding more relevant workshops. |
| 1 | By adding some more workshops. |
| 1 | Course material is good, but order of some topics were slightly jumbled. |
| 1 | Few more workshops related to the content are needed for extra practice. |
| 1 | I think the training material has to be well organised. |
| 1 | Include more examples and workshops to the material |
| 1 | It was good. |
| 1 | PROVIDING RECAP SESSION EVERY DAY LIKE WE DID. |
| 1 | Try to include the topics based on new version of T24 in powerpoint. |
| 1 | by preparing more practical things.in detail explaination for all the topics. |
| 1 | give in depth materials. |
| 1 | keeping environment more suitable and giving more relevant examples |
| 1 | some extra workshops are required. |
| 1 | with many more examples and workshops. |
| 1 | All are good. only think i felt is in AA module, one more example can be added which has the banking terms. |
| Very Dissatisfied | Dissatisfied | Neutral | Satisfied | Very Satisfied | Average | Responses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How would you rate the overall experience? | 0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
0
0.00% |
6
25.00% |
18
75.00% |
4.75 | 24 |
| Average % | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.00% | 75.00% | 4.75 | 24 |
| Count | Response |
|---|---|
| 1 | Everything really helped us but for some topics we needed more time . |
| 1 | More clarity and depth in the topic. |
| 1 | More good explanation in some topics. |
| 1 | more depth in topics. |
| 1 | If thought with more practical examples .And if materials are provided from beginning of training and if environment is good all the time |
| 1 | If there is more time then we can go through the course material once again and we can do more examples in detail |