You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #138: Disease Incidence Prevention by Serum 25(OH)D Level --Cancers, Diabetes, MS, Fractures, HeartAttacks [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #124
138. Disease Incidence Prevention by Serum 25(OH)D Level --Cancers, Diabetes, MS, Fractures, HeartAttacks
Disease Incidence Prevention
by Serum 25(OH)D Level
A chart showing the required vitamin D serum levels for prevention of many diseases
including cancers, falls, heart attacks and diabetes and several others

click to view PDF

Source:    GrassrootsHealth   (updated 10/16/08)


Ranges of optimal serum 25(OH)D concentrations by vitamin D experts:

Dr. John Cannell   (10/1/2008)
Dr. Michael Holick   (3/6/2009   "healthy range"= >30 to 100; "all of my patients...":)
Dr. Cedric Garland* @ :33:26 (patients: "60...about right, certainly not much lower than 50, based on data")
Dr. Donald L. Trump @ :25:26 (no toxicity @100ng/mL. Clinical opinion, incl for prostate cancer patients)
Dr. Robert Heaney** @ :16:54 (best-estimate of primitive level = 60 is "very reasonable")
Dr. Soram Khalsa (book: 40 to 70. On newer basis for "optimal penetration of all our tissues...looking like...":)
 50
to
80
ng/mL

 40
to
100
ng/mL

 40
to
60
ng/mL

 60
to
75
ng/mL

~48
to
60
ng/mL

 50
to
80
ng/mL

 

serum 25(OH)D units conversion:    32 ng/mL * 2.496 == 80 nMol/L


*
@ :34:11
 
...we will not only avoid rickets, most certainly, but you will see a wide range of diseases...that can similarly be at least
"put on hold" maybe for a few centuries.


**
@ :22:50
 
...better than 85%...would have been below 80 nMol/L (32 ng/mL)...So, as a kind of a generalization -- in Boston, at least -- patients on a general medical ward are effectively all vitamin D deficient -- the vast majority of them.


**
@ :36:54
 
...serum 25(OH)D levels below 80 nmol/L (32 ng/ml) are not adequate for any body system
Calcium absorptive regulation is suboptimal below 80 nMol/L ( 32 ng/ml)



Chart, 'All Cancers' reference:
Lappe JM, Travers-Gustafson D, Davies KM, Recker RR, Heaney RP
Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer risk: results of a randomized trial   Amer J Clin Nutr. 2007; 85:1586-91

Related (see abstract):
Estimated benefit of increased Vitamin D status in reducing the economic burden of disease in Western Europe   2/11/09
William B. Grant, Heide S. Cross, Cedric F. Garland, Edward D. Gorham, Johan Moan, Meinrad Peterlik, Alina C. Porojnicu, Jörg Reichrath
and Armin Zittermann

 


 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC