Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Former Intelligence Agent Says Google In Bed With CIA

2 views
Skip to first unread message

BrentB

unread,
Oct 29, 2006, 4:52:06 PM10/29/06
to
Not off topic! I've been getting junk from my google searches. 9-11
videos are being tampered with. Shame on you google. Check this video
and see if my comment is on it. There were 17 ratings with only 7
views! The other more popular 9-11 video view numbers are an obvious
LIE.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7387597892977206184&q=GNN+GARY+WEBB&hl=en

Former Intelligence Agent Says Google In Bed With CIA
Steele also sounds off on 9/11 doubts

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | October 27 2006

A former clandestine services officer for the CIA who also maintains
close relationships with top Google representatives says that the
company is "in bed with" the intelligence agency and the U.S.
government. He has also gone public on his deep suspicions about the
official explanation behind 9/11.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/bb/google_in_bed_with_gov_cia_says_former_agent.htm

Spread the word...

StubbyElvis

unread,
Oct 29, 2006, 10:04:08 PM10/29/06
to
is it Lyme that obscures your reasoning, or were your born an idiot?

BrentB

unread,
Oct 29, 2006, 10:34:54 PM10/29/06
to

StubbyElvis wrote:
> is it Lyme that obscures your reasoning, or were your born an idiot?


Thats now 23 ratings made with only 7 views.

Stubby be a fucking man and add something...any fucking thing to your
post. There's nothing to debate...hollow and empty like your brain.
pathetic.

StubbyElvis

unread,
Oct 30, 2006, 12:01:08 AM10/30/06
to
upon further review, i stand corrected. the CIA has indeed manipulated
google as part of their omni-present control of any information that
undermines the present administration. it's amazing how effective
they've been at controling the media. you are obviously well informed
and extremely perspicacious.

p.s. you should get the names of a few of the defense department
intelligence services to use in your conspiracy stories. everyone at
the hardy boys secret decoder ring conspiracy theory club likes to
weave stories around agencies like Strategic Support Branch. CIA is
very passé since they've been relegated to relatively mundane
bureaucratic analysis functions after 911.

StubbyElvis

unread,
Oct 30, 2006, 8:03:16 AM10/30/06
to
There are a multiple of reasons for abduction. Your brain capacity and
abilities have been computed by an engineer. He found that if you had
computers to do all that the brain can do, it would be a computer...the
size of the state of Texas. 50 stories tall!


You have about 150,000 miles of neural network in your body. You
probably only use a few hundred feet in your lifetime.


You use about .002% of your brain. What do you suppose the other
99.998% could be used for? Don't have any idea? Someone does. Someone
has come a long long way to find your uniqueness and exploit it in ways
you may find "simply unbelievable". Don't you see your designed
for greatness. Designed far greater than you imagine. Jesus put it
perfectly" greater works will you do than i have done"!
Someone is just noticing that "ability, capacity, uniqueness, ? And
want to use it (in various ways) via:


Limiting it (in certain lineages)
Expanding it (in certain lineages)


They often just "check on it" in many lineages. Just to see how the
project is coming. You are unique... and someone knows it... whether
you do or not.


Is there a government involvement about Abductions and UFO matter?


Yes.


Here is an interview with some canadian scientist and me: this short
interview (and notes provided here) is included for clarification of
this event.

NEWS WIRE MESSAGE AND RESPONSE FROM DERREL SIMS, UFO INVESTIGATOR AND
EX CIA (INTELLIGENCE OPERATIVE) HOUSTON, TEXAS


We're going to go ahead and do a 5-minute interview with you. The
host's name is Neil Aitchison...
SUBJECT: CANADIAN D.O.D. SCIENTISTS WORRY: UFO CHASERS MIGHT TRIGGER A
CLOSE ENCOUNTER WITH ALIENS!


********Here's the story that came off the newswire:
Toronto -- A couple of Defense Department scientists are worried that
amateur UFO chasers might trigger a close encounter with aliens.


Derrel Sims: If only one of the cases that I investigate (worldwide) is
true, even in the slightest sense, then this "contact" has already
happened. The real question is "Who knows" that besides the victim of
the experience? It is my contention that the US Government, Brazilian
Government (both, in part) know of this contact at the intelligence
levels. The US and Brazilian contact is well documented and on my
Internet sites (www.alienhunter.org or www.FIRSTevidence.org).
Classified papers are there between the US Government and Brazil.
Daniel Goldin and Warren Christopher's signatures are on the documents.
Soon I will put up the rest of the story. When the Brazilian story
broke, it hit the front page of the Wall Street Journal (even if only
tongue in cheek) Perhaps we should pay attention. Someone on Wall
Street did.


NASA's own Farouk El -Baz (NASA geologist-primary investigator, Apollo.


Director for Research for the Smithsonian's National Air and Space
Museum and geology instructor for the Apollo astronauts states: "There
have been quite a few unexplainable objects, but most interesting are
those tremendously long shadows cast by enormous spires seen almost
everywhere on the moon...They're much lighter in color than the
surrounding mare or lava fields, which gives them an additional aura of
mystery. They seem to have been constructed of different materials."


DS. It is not the non-professional UFO chasers that bother me. It is
the professional ones. I mean they have really gotten the money to
Chase a UFO (with our tax dollars and then classify the finds so that
we pay for it but don't get it!) The US DSP (Defense Support Program
Satellite System) alone should tell us all something. This system of 18
satellites are so sensitive that they can read the dial on your watch,
detect mad cow disease from space and even track UFOs (AKA
"Fastwalkers", in intelligence lingo).

They're urging the federal government to censor any communications
intended for aliens.


DS. If aliens don't exist then why all the fuss? NASA under the
Extraterrestrial Exposure Law (circa 1981's) states that (ostensibly an
astronaut) can be fined $5,000.00 dollars and be imprisoned and
quarantined if these laws are violated.) ... my question is again. IF
THERE ARE NO ALIENS THEN WHY THE LAW? SHOULD THERE BE A CONCERN? I
think there is concern.
At a former Soviet bloc 7 nation conference for the study of US and
SOVIETBLOCK MIL/INTEL COVER-UPS Sims was the featured speaker to
present his case of cover-up. The presentation was met with a medallion
for his efforts. SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) is a system capable
of doing more than shooting enemy missiles out of the air. A number of
Russian Scientists figured this out quickly.


The two astrophysicists, who work at the defense research establishment
in Valcartier, Quebec, made the appeal directly to the Prime Minister
by e-mail. They're worried that inexperienced UFO chasers could
inadvertently invite an invasion from other worlds.


DS. If one looks at the US/CANADA area from the satellites at night,
the entire outline of the continent can be seen by the lighted cities.
Did we think no one would notice?! No one has expressed a definition of
what an "alien" might be. It seems to me, we'd better be finding out
what it is that the DSP infrared/ultraviolet and visual range sensors
are picking up.
Interestingly enough, I am finding physical evidence findings with
these light ranges on some alleged abductees. The DSP satellite system
of 18 units, 22,300 orbit miles, is designed to detect the launch of
ICBM and test-band monitoring. It is primarily IR digital,
multi-bandwidth, with "special" detectors. So what is a "SPECIAL EVENT
SENSOR": These two sensors are quite interesting in that they are made
from relatively thick-walled aluminum (and therefore are NOT alpha or
beta particle detectors) and are filled with crystals. Some think that
these are the sensors uniquely designed to detect "FASTWALKERS" or
UFOs. If so the PROFESSIONAL UFO CHASERS are already doing the job they
claim doesn't exist.


For example, they say UFO cultists could send a message through space
asking extra-terrestrials to come and rule earth.


DS. If a person is not a scientist he is automatically a "cultist"? I
certainly have no interest in cultists (in the intelligence community
or otherwise) but IF someone could "make contact" shouldn't the
government be a bit interested in the technique(s) involved. After Sims
went on the Art Bell Radio show (15 million potential listeners) and
spoke on this subject he obtained 180 hits on his (www.alienhunter.org)
website. The hits were from NASA, CIA, NSA, ASA, and a NSA computer
located in the WHITE HOUSE. It makes you wonder who is watching whom. I
feel like governments should be accountable to tax payers inquires. We
are paying for this secrecy. Whatever the UFO phenomena is, good, bad
or something else, this kind of information belongs to the world at
large. It should not belong to the US, Russia, science, or to an
investigator. It is a world class issue. It is an issue that should be
solved once and for all.


A spokesman for Jean Chretien says the government doesn't think that
fraternizing with aliens from outer space is a problem.


DS. Does this mean that your Government is agreed to "fraternization
with an alien presence" or is it strictly "tongue in cheek?

One of the scientists says his efforts to contact aliens are not
related to his work at the defense department.


DS. Is this an admission that a Professional Alien Chaser is attempting
human/alien contact? If so, Perhaps he should contact my team and me.


This e-mail was obtained by The National Post (excluding this
interview).


125 MILL DOLLAR UFO DETECTOR the dsp (Defense Systems satillite). The
18 units see in the ultraviolet, infrafred and visible light range. Ron
Regehr and I met years ago and discussed the uniqueness of my uv, ir,
and visible markings finds of 1992. This unit detects "mad" cow disease
and cattle that appear to have been fluorescently "premarked" by the
alien entities.


And, to finish, do you think that we will able to resolve this mystery
( UFO & Abductions ) within some years?


PART OF ONE OF MY 5 BOOKS ON EVIDENCE AND THE ALIEN AGENDA:


R: MED/PSYCH/SCI EVIDENCE OF ALIEN ENTITIES: AND WHY THIS WILL NOT
REVEAL THE INTENT OR GIVE CREDIBLE EXPLOITATION OF THE ALIEN AGENDA:
The body of Medical evidence here will show that this is a Medical
situation of great import, but the Medical work that we do will not
Cure the problem. The medical evidence will only show there is a UFO
phenomena and a UFO problem.
The body of Scientific discovery prompted by our Field work and
highlighted by our Medical finds will show that the Scientific Work
will not solve or completely answer the UFO problem.
The Psychological PhysioDynamic will show that there is a Psychological
UFO problem. It will tell us about the UFO maze and UFO puzzle...the
UFO problem but will not show us the Answer.
I spent over 2 years in the C.I.A. in covert ops. What I discovered
about that system of thinking, is that you have to have (or use) other
hats "to think with" before coming to a conclusion.
For instance: Mad cow disease: In an interview with Ron Regehr, a DSP
Satillite specialist and aeronautics engineer 1997 I reported, on Art
Bell, that this specialized satellite system could discover the
propensity mad cow disease via one of the 3 "eyes" of the system.
The particular eye is the infra red one. It can detect the heat
differential of 5 degrees in one animal (like a deer or elk in the
herd, or a cow for that matter in a slaughter lot) . Now this is
amazing. It is also horrific that the Dsp Systems May have known this
information for some time...Particualrly after looking at known
infected herds in England.

My question to Ron, a dear friend, was "Has the Dsp system seen a
heat ratio like that in deer / elk population in the USA?
Answer YES
Was that detection primarily in the Colorado, Utah, Wyoming area?
Answer YES.
This gives us the Scientific "VIEW" but it really doesn't address
the question of "How did it get here?"
The MEDICAL answer is now in progress. My friend and former police
officer Ted Oliphant was the first person to show a connection to mad
cow disease and other spongiforms as possible "jumpers" of species.
The Medical and the Scientific approaches have only told us "it
exists, and what it does in terms of effects" it hasn't (YET)
answered the question of "why is it here".
The intelligence Question (HAT) here is Where/Why did it get here, and
what is it's purpose?
THIS ANALOGY IS CENTRAL TO MY POSITION HERE.
The UFO ENIGMA is not a medical problem. The UFO ENIGMA is not a
Scienfic problem. The UFO ENIGMA is not a Psychological problem.
THE UFO ENIGMA is an intelligence problem. Since the big questions are
"why are they here, and Why are they deceptive" the science, the
medical field, and the psychological field will never be able to answer
fully those questions. The primary reason is "the evidence you find
will often be elusive, spoon fed to you, misidentified, misinterpreted,
categorized in ways that are not "what it is" but what it is
"allowed".
If my Thesis is correct. Then what we have is not a med/psych/sci
problem, but an intelligence agency problem.
Why do you think the CIA was started in ? Why do you think the NSA (8
times the CIA) was started in 1947?
All were directly after WWII and immediately after "the 509th Atomic
bomb wing's reporting of a downed 'flying saucer".


Why? Do you think the Intelligencia about UFOS stopped then?

Vernon

unread,
Oct 30, 2006, 9:17:43 AM10/30/06
to
You DID know that the president's office is super powerful. didn't you?

It always has these omnipotent GODS sitting in control. Presidents are
really Zeus in disguise.

You do realize that F.D.Roosevelt planned the Pear Harbor attack.
Bush controls oil prices.
Oh, we musn't forget that Nixon was the mastermind behind the Kenedy
assasination. That was because of Kennedy's involvment in the cover-up of
the foiled Martian invation in New Mexico.
The most astounding power is that ANYTHING gets done in the government.
The second most astounding thing is the mesmerization of the public to think
that the members of CIA or FBI are other than hum. But, maybe with all
their super powers, they are not really human.
Of course we mustn't forget the power of congressmen / Senators who can fool
these super organizations such as CIA and FBI.
Oh, I almost forgot the latest release from a recent CIA retired person.
Reagan established the Taliban and the entire New Islam movement to
culminate in 9/11 so that we could take control of the mid-east oil. BUT
that required Abraham Lincoln to create a fake war here so that the Anti Jew
movement could get started in the mid-east and spread to Germany.

You just don't understand the power of these alien gods who pretend to be
Presidents, CIA, FBI.

OR we could know the truth.
They are people.
They (none) are there with super powers.
We are lucky they don't destroy America with cross purposes, much less put
together a super secret plan.

Oh, yes, I have worked with (not in) just about every government agency. I
feel real smart when there. The part I envy is that they have attained
lifetime income with near zero knowledge OR cognative capability. One of
the primary uses of OUTSIDE contractors is to allow two or more government
persons to work with each other. I had top secret clearance for many
years. The SECRETS were about as secret as Madona's boobs. They just
thought that no one else knew.


JohnDoe

unread,
Oct 30, 2006, 10:51:43 AM10/30/06
to
Vernon wrote:

-snip-


>
> Oh, yes, I have worked with (not in) just about every government agency. I
> feel real smart when there. The part I envy is that they have attained
> lifetime income with near zero knowledge OR cognative capability. One of
> the primary uses of OUTSIDE contractors is to allow two or more government
> persons to work with each other. I had top secret clearance for many
> years.

Did you really write this Vernon, or is this a case of bad quoting?
In any case, I guess even the super secret sections of the office in
Langley and the Pentagon need to have their floor mopped. I can see why
they would give you top secret clearance. Even if you did come across
some real secrets, it would be impossible to tell the difference between
the real thing and those from your rather vivid imagination.

Buc Nasty

unread,
Oct 30, 2006, 1:17:30 PM10/30/06
to

BrentB

unread,
Oct 30, 2006, 3:08:16 PM10/30/06
to

119 views with 29 ratings. At least that's in the realm of
possibilities.

StubbyElvis

unread,
Oct 30, 2006, 3:38:48 PM10/30/06
to
what's amazing is that someone who believes that the "shadow
government" that is the architect of this grand far reaching conspiracy
also believes that somehow are unable to manipulate a simpe java script
hit counter for number of views.

keep up the great detective work, sherlock.

pretty 'tarded

BrentB

unread,
Oct 30, 2006, 4:30:46 PM10/30/06
to

Yes there's nothing shady going on. A fucking pandemic which we have a
GD cure. A president who killed thousands of New Yorkers so he could
grab some oil. Yes...nothing shady going on. just move along...

Vernon

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 8:26:40 AM10/31/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162243846.1...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Some people actually believe that nonsense.
Bush would have to be the most powerful and omnipotent human to ever have
live in order for that to have happened.

Those same people have zero idea where profits come from and under what
circumstances in the oil industry. Simple minded conspiracy nuts who give
godly power to their pretend gods.

I mean REALLY deranged people.


BrentB

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 9:31:06 AM10/31/06
to

Will then who did bring down the building Vernon? Surly your not
stating WTC 7 fell in demolition style due to deisel fires?!?

"I'm convinced that within one or two years at most, the entire
academic community will agree that the 9/11 commission report is a
travesty and a fraud."

Brigham Young University physics professor Steven Jones
I should say ex-professor as BYU censures free speech.

HICKWITHLYME

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 10:37:50 AM10/31/06
to
GOOD ARTICLE BRENT.


Vernon

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 11:00:55 AM10/31/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162305066.4...@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Yep, Bush is a super power god and he has all these other super power gods
working for him.
At least Brigham Young U is intelligent enough to relieve an insane person
of their worries. That is something a few other Universities need to do.
Irrational speech in an academic environment is NOT FREE speech.
Zombies sitting in the classrooms completely uninterested in learning what
they came to learn is not the sign of a good University.

Go get an engineering degree and work in buildings a few years and then see
if being deranged allows you to continue.
Yes, I saw WTC 7 videos and I made the comment and accusation of how stupid
and low bid the building was. All of the external / internal explosives
etc. could not create the sequence.

There are literally THOUSANDS of architectural engineers and demolition
engineers who saw the films. I am in agreement with them. I also do not
believe Bush is a god with super powers. There are also thousands of
experts in the oil industry who know what makes it tick and 9/11 wasn't an
answer and neither is the Iraq war.
None are not sitting around considering free speech ramifications.
Out of all those experts who make a real living being right, one nut
"professor" (non-productive) has some inside knowledge? SUUUURE He has
already taken care of ten years salary with monies from speeches and
articles.


HICKWITHLYME

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 11:02:50 AM10/31/06
to


HE MUST HAVE KNOWN TO MUCH

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:1162305066.4...@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

HICKWITHLYME

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 11:07:00 AM10/31/06
to
HE IS A CROOK, AND I WATCHED THE VIDEO'S,AND ANYONE WITH COMMON SENSE COULD
SEE THEY ALL FEEL THE SAME WAY,,,FIRES USUALLY BURN UP...WHAT ABOUT ALL THE
DUST?

"Vernon" <anere@anhere> wrote in message
news:45477331$0$17467$882e...@news.ThunderNews.com...

BrentB

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 11:31:25 AM10/31/06
to

Can you link the thousands?

Bush is anything but God...perhaps he's the the devil or a minor
minion. Steve is not a lone voice in the wilderness. There are plenty
of high ranking people and many in the intelligencia who KNOW for a
fact the physics are impossible or the hole in the pentagon is not via
an airplane. See scholars for 911truth link below.

On the collapse. The netherlands TV did a debunk story on 911 but found
out the physics class came to the same conclusion. The official story
is imposible. period.
Replay a few times and notice: (see video)

* The roofs dips inward
* Explosions are visible running up on the right side
* Explosions are visible in the front
* Simultaneous symmetrical collapse (all joints fail at the same
time)
* Falls at free-fall speed
* Falls into its own footprint without damaging surrounding
buildings

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/

The question is not are they right or wrong...the question is WHY with
so many reputable people stepping forward the mass media is silent.
(silence=guilt)

http://tinyurl.com/yltsdk

Vernon

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 2:22:20 PM10/31/06
to

"HICKWITHLYME" <HICK...@woh.oh.RR.net> wrote in message
news:abafb$4547750d$438c0976$22...@ALLTEL.NET...

> HE IS A CROOK, AND I WATCHED THE VIDEO'S,AND ANYONE WITH COMMON SENSE
> COULD
> SEE THEY ALL FEEL THE SAME WAY,,,FIRES USUALLY BURN UP...WHAT ABOUT ALL
> THE
> DUST?
>

Duuuhh when things fall there is dust.

Ask the thousands of architectural and demolition engineers, but FIRST get
an education and then get rid of hate for what you think is a god, THEN ask.

The only general consensus is that the buildings were built by low bidder.

Anyone and everyone can walk around the site. There would be residue from
any explosive. That is unless you also think the government people have
supernatural powers that can erase the residue. BTW, The residue would
STILL be evident DDUUUUUUHHHH.


Vernon

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 2:24:44 PM10/31/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162312285....@e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

So you are certifiably insane.

BrentB

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 2:48:13 PM10/31/06
to

More insane folks. I'll just list a couple. All critics of the official
story. If you like I post many many more. Where your link on those
thousands?

Cleland, Senator Max - Member of the 9/11 Commission. Former U.S.
Senator from Georgia
Berg, Philip J. - Deputy Attorney General, Pennsylvania
Conrad, David Mark - Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs
Ray, Col. Ronald D. - Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under
Ronald Reagan

>
> Duuuhh when things fall there is dust.
>
> Ask the thousands of architectural and demolition engineers, but FIRST get
> an education and then get rid of hate for what you think is a god, THEN ask.
>
> The only general consensus is that the buildings were built by low bidder.

Nope seen the certificate when this theory went out. Everything built
according to specs. Did you know both towers needed miilions if not
billions of renovations? Luckily he added terrorism insurance just in
time.

>
> Anyone and everyone can walk around the site. There would be residue from
> any explosive. That is unless you also think the government people have
> supernatural powers that can erase the residue. BTW, The residue would
> STILL be evident DDUUUUUUHHHH.

1. A few short weeks after 9/11, tons of metal from the collapsed twin
towers was sold to scrap yards in New Jersey. Thereafter, the steel was
re-sold to other recyclers in the United States and overseas. Anecdotal
evidence suggests that the "scrap" has ended up in India, Japan,
South Korea, China and Malaysia.

It is the FSC's position that the thousands of pounds of debris was
crime-scene evidence. It should have been examined, catalogued, and
stored in a secure location.

Why were the steel beams sold and shipped overseas and not retained as
evidence? Was the material examined before it was sent overseas? If
examined, then by whom? Were any diagnostic studies/tests performed? If
not, then why? Whose responsibility was this?

Former FBI Acting Director Thomas Pickard said that the FBI wanted to
take over Ground Zero and make it a crime scene as was done at the
Pentagon. If that had occurred all materials from the scene would have
been protected until an investigation was complete. Pickard also stated
that you, Mayor Giuliani, would not allow the FBI access to the pit
area.

http://911independentcommission.org/questions.html

Mark Probert

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 6:38:47 PM10/31/06
to

Vernon, I have to agree with you. A HS classmate of mine owns an
implosion company, and he and I watched the video when he visited NY a
few years ago. His comment was that if it were an implosion, just how
did the conspirators manage to sneak in all of that explosives without
alerting anyone?

AFAIC, these people are as bad as laetrile pushers.

BrentB

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 7:37:08 PM10/31/06
to

It's a fact that President Bush's brother Marvin and his cousin Wirt
Walker III were both heads of the company in charge of security for the
WTCs. It's also been reported that noises were heard before the attack
on floors that should have been empty also a strange dust was reported
to settle in the offices. It's also a fact someone called off the
explosive sniffing dogs when the building was evacuated for "upgrades"
to the infrastructure.

Why jump in? Not trying to defend Israel now are you?

Between August 26 and September 11, 2001 a group of speculators from
Israel sold 'short' a list of 38 stocks that could reasonably be
expected to fall in value as a result of the pending attacks.
Investigations as to who they were by the SEC, DoJ and the FBI have
mysteriously stopped dead in their tracks. Also...remember those
celebrating Mossad agents during the attack?

StubbyElvis

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 8:40:32 PM10/31/06
to
you convinced me, brent. it was the "a group of speculators from
Israel sold 'short' a list of 38 stocks ," that finally opened my eyes.
there's NO WAY a group of stock speculators would be short stocks!!
thanks for setting things straight.

just curious: what's a mastermind like yourself do for a living?
what's your educational background?

keep up the greay work!

p.s. why didn't the Israeli stock traders buy the puts or write naked
calls instead of merely selling the equity short?

p.p.s. sure was nice of ben laden to play along with the whole plot.
never realized he was so pro-Israel.

BrentB

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 9:24:39 PM10/31/06
to

StubbyElvis wrote:
> you convinced me, brent. it was the "a group of speculators from
> Israel sold 'short' a list of 38 stocks ," that finally opened my eyes.
> there's NO WAY a group of stock speculators would be short stocks!!
> thanks for setting things straight.

The point is we can't find out who they are. Some money even went into
an unmarked account and it's still there. Millions...nope nothing
strange about that.

>
> just curious: what's a mastermind like yourself do for a living?
> what's your educational background?

none of your fucking business.

>
> keep up the greay work!

keep being an anonymous whore on a Lyme newsgroup and saying NOTHING
about lyme! I've had lyme and now I need to re-learn thousands of
words...It's a symptom. Making fun of those with a disease...you must
be a Rush Limbaugh fan.

>
> p.s. why didn't the Israeli stock traders buy the puts or write naked
> calls instead of merely selling the equity short?

be nice if we could ask them huh?

>
> p.p.s. sure was nice of ben laden to play along with the whole plot.
> never realized he was so pro-Israel.

Don't know about this. I've seen the video where he eats from his right
hand (he's left handed) and wearing a gold ring which is forbidden in
the Muslim religion. Then there's the CBS report by Dan Rather that
Osama had been admitted to a Pakistani military hospital. They knew
where he was before and shortly after the attack. They...did...nothing.

David Wright

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 10:29:12 PM10/31/06
to
In article <45477331$0$17467$882e...@news.ThunderNews.com>,
Vernon <anere@anhere> wrote:

>I also do not believe Bush is a god with super powers.

Boy, there goes your invitation to the next State of the Union
address.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"George Bush is a gruesome boob." -- Bill Maher

BrentB

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 10:37:09 PM10/31/06
to

StubbyElvis wrote:
> you convinced me, brent. it was the "a group of speculators from
> Israel sold 'short' a list of 38 stocks ," that finally opened my eyes.
> there's NO WAY a group of stock speculators would be short stocks!!
> thanks for setting things straight.
>

Sense you're interested.

"Selling Short" is the borrowing of stock, selling it at current
market prices, but not being required to actually produce the stock for
some time. If the stock falls precipitously after the short contract is
entered, the seller can then fulfill the contract by buying the stock
after the price has fallen and complete the contract at the pre-crash
price. These contracts often have a window of as long as four months.


A September 21 story by the Israeli Herzliyya International Policy
Institute for Counterterrorism, entitled "Black Tuesday: The
World's Largest Insider Trading Scam?" documented the following
trades connected to the September 11 attacks:

- Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but
only 396 call options... Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought
by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these
"insiders" would have profited by almost $5 million.

- On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were
bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. Again,
there was no news at that point to justify this imbalance;... Again,
assuming that 4,000 of these options trades represent "insiders,"
they would represent a gain of about $4 million.

- [The levels of put options purchased above were more than six
times higher than normal.]

- No similar trading in other airlines occurred on the Chicago
exchange in the days immediately preceding Black Tuesday.

- Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., which occupied 22 floors of
the World Trade Center, saw 2,157 of its October $45 put options bought
in the three trading days before Black Tuesday; this compares to an
average of 27 contracts per day before September 6. Morgan Stanley's
share price fell from $48.90 to $42.50 in the aftermath of the attacks.
Assuming that 2,000 of these options contracts were bought based upon
knowledge of the approaching attacks, their purchasers could have
profited by at least $1.2 million. Merrill Lynch & Co., with
headquarters near the Twin Towers, saw 12,215 October $45 put options
bought in the four trading days before the attacks; the previous
average volume in those shares had been 252 contracts per day [a 1200%
increase!]. When trading resumed, Merrill's shares fell from $46.88
to $41.50; assuming that 11,000 option contracts were bought by
"insiders," their profit would have been about $5.5 million.

- European regulators are examining trades in Germany's Munich
Re, Switzerland's Swiss Re, and AXA of France, all major reinsurers
with exposure to the Black Tuesday disaster. [FTW Note: AXA also owns
more than 25% of American Airlines stock making the attacks a "double
whammy" for them.]
On September 29, 2001 - in a vital story that has gone unnoticed by
the major media - the San Francisco Chronicle reported, "Investors
have yet to collect more than $2.5 million in profits they made trading
options in the stock of United Airlines before the Sept. 11, terrorist
attacks, according to a source familiar with the trades and market
data.

"The uncollected money raises suspicions that the investors - whose
identities and nationalities have not been made public - had advance
knowledge of the strikes." They don't dare show up now. The
suspension of trading for four days after the attacks made it
impossible to cash-out quickly and claim the prize before investigators
started looking.

http://www.hereinreality.com/insidertrading.html

Vernon

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 10:39:59 PM10/31/06
to

"Mark Probert" <markp...@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:b8R1h.5426$dx4.4875@trndny05...

Oh, you don't understand. These people have supernatural powers, probably
part of the Illuminati, the true illuminati. They are aided by knowing the
real DaVinci code that was the ORIGINAL plan for 9/11.

Vernon

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 10:43:05 PM10/31/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162341428....@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

You really are insane.

And

Full of plain every day hate and bigotry.

Thousands of educated people disagree with you.
Educated people get that way because they are not insane and have near zero
bigotry.


StubbyElvis

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 10:43:50 PM10/31/06
to
>
> keep being an anonymous whore on a Lyme newsgroup and saying NOTHING
> about lyme! I've had lyme and now I need to re-learn thousands of
> words...It's a symptom. Making fun of those with a disease...you must
> be a Rush Limbaugh fan.
>

My name is Mark Draper. I live in North Palm Beach, FL. My email is
webmaster @101click.com You can look up the DNS registratration and
confirm my identity. F' it....call me on the phone if ya like. But
to any action-conspiracy-freaks who dare mess w/ me, let it be known
that I do exercise my Second Amendment rights. Now it's your turn to
show me what an anonymous ahole is all about. What's you name and
address?

I'm truly sorry about your condition. Very glad you are getting
better.
Could Lyme cause paranoia? Not being a smartass w/ that question.

I think Limbaugh is a blow hard. But if you'd like something to sink
your hate into, let it be known I'm a big Ann Coulter fan.

God Bless,
Mark (aka "Joel")

Vernon

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 10:46:04 PM10/31/06
to

"StubbyElvis" <webm...@101click.com> wrote in message
news:1162345232....@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Man, don't you know? Ben Laden is a Jew in disguise and really a second
cousin to Bush. Get with it.

We must not forget the collusion the gods had in this. Bush is really Zeus
in disguise.


Vernon

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 10:52:26 PM10/31/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162347879.0...@e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

>
> StubbyElvis wrote:
>> you convinced me, brent. it was the "a group of speculators from
>> Israel sold 'short' a list of 38 stocks ," that finally opened my eyes.
>> there's NO WAY a group of stock speculators would be short stocks!!
>> thanks for setting things straight.
>
> The point is we can't find out who they are. Some money even went into
> an unmarked account and it's still there. Millions...nope nothing
> strange about that.

Millions? Gee, millions. Peanuts except to the uneducated.

>
>>
>> just curious: what's a mastermind like yourself do for a living?
>> what's your educational background?
>
> none of your fucking business.

Oh, now we know, the business of fucking. Thank you, hate pimp.

>
>>
>> keep up the greay work!
>
> keep being an anonymous whore on a Lyme newsgroup and saying NOTHING
> about lyme! I've had lyme and now I need to re-learn thousands of
> words...It's a symptom. Making fun of those with a disease...you must
> be a Rush Limbaugh fan.
>
>>
>> p.s. why didn't the Israeli stock traders buy the puts or write naked
>> calls instead of merely selling the equity short?
>
> be nice if we could ask them huh?
>
>>
>> p.p.s. sure was nice of ben laden to play along with the whole plot.
>> never realized he was so pro-Israel.
>
> Don't know about this. I've seen the video where he eats from his right
> hand (he's left handed) and wearing a gold ring which is forbidden in
> the Muslim religion. Then there's the CBS report by Dan Rather that
> Osama had been admitted to a Pakistani military hospital. They knew
> where he was before and shortly after the attack. They...did...nothing.
>

Gee, you don't suppose they have different traditions than you do???
Did you notice that almost all Europeans are left handed. Videos prove it.

Videos prove beyond any doubt that the English don't know which side is up
on a fork and often they are so stupid they mistake their saucer for a cup.

Thank you for again illustrating what people without an education fall for.


RosieBush

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 10:56:22 PM10/31/06
to
Yes, how hard can it be to find a seven foot tall man,that needs dialisis.
I must say after watching video's,I myself say the buildings were
detinated,by explosives.


BrentB

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 11:03:01 PM10/31/06
to

StubbyElvis wrote:
> >
> > keep being an anonymous whore on a Lyme newsgroup and saying NOTHING
> > about lyme! I've had lyme and now I need to re-learn thousands of
> > words...It's a symptom. Making fun of those with a disease...you must
> > be a Rush Limbaugh fan.
> >
>
> My name is Mark Draper. I live in North Palm Beach, FL. My email is
> webmaster @101click.com You can look up the DNS registratration and
> confirm my identity. F' it....call me on the phone if ya like. But
> to any action-conspiracy-freaks who dare mess w/ me, let it be known
> that I do exercise my Second Amendment rights. Now it's your turn to
> show me what an anonymous ahole is all about. What's you name and
> address?

It's my email addy. Sorry confused you with another...we have anonymous
pricks screwing up this newsgroup...I'm also a big fan of that Second
Amendment right. Live in Humble, TX.

>
> I'm truly sorry about your condition. Very glad you are getting
> better.
> Could Lyme cause paranoia? Not being a smartass w/ that question.

It can and does do pretty much everything. Find a disease and you'll
probably find borrelia.


>
> I think Limbaugh is a blow hard. But if you'd like something to sink
> your hate into, let it be known I'm a big Ann Coulter fan.
>
> God Bless,
> Mark (aka "Joel")

Is there a difference?

StubbyElvis

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 11:12:00 PM10/31/06
to

BrentB wrote:
> StubbyElvis wrote:
> > you convinced me, brent. it was the "a group of speculators from
> > Israel sold 'short' a list of 38 stocks ," that finally opened my eyes.
> > there's NO WAY a group of stock speculators would be short stocks!!
> > thanks for setting things straight.
> >
>
> Sense you're interested.
>
> "Selling Short" is the borrowing of stock, selling it at current
> market prices, but not being required to actually produce the stock for
> some time. If the stock falls precipitously after the short contract is
> entered, the seller can then fulfill the contract by buying the stock
> after the price has fallen and complete the contract at the pre-crash
> price. These contracts often have a window of as long as four months.


LOL I used to trade derivatives for Bear Stearns. I'm series 7 and 63.
And technically speaking, selling an equity short is simply selling it
before you buy it. A short contract pertains to futures and options
trading.

>
>
> A September 21 story by the Israeli Herzliyya International Policy
> Institute for Counterterrorism, entitled "Black Tuesday: The
> World's Largest Insider Trading Scam?" documented the following
> trades connected to the September 11 attacks:
>
> - Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options
> Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but
> only 396 call options... Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought
> by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these
> "insiders" would have profited by almost $5 million.

5 million is nothing in the options/futures market. and there's
imbalances all the time on any given day. arbitrage traders routinely
trade blocks of index derivatives worth hundreds of millions simply
based on black-scholes calculations.

the fact that you'd even use a 5 million trade to support your argument
shows how little you knowabout the derivatives markets. you sound like
doctor ecil asking for ONE MILLION DOLLARS or he'll blow up the world.

as for the volume of contracts traded, the open interest was not out of
line with the trading history. look up the graph for yourself.

this is just silly.

have fun

BrentB

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 11:12:32 PM10/31/06
to

I'm rubber and you're glue...

>
> And
>
> Full of plain every day hate and bigotry.
>
> Thousands of educated people disagree with you.
> Educated people get that way because they are not insane and have near zero
> bigotry.

blah,blah,blah.

May want to have something of interest to post before typing it out
next time.

BrentB

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 11:42:49 PM10/31/06
to

Vern your stupidity cracks me up and btw I'm college educated and was
one of the smartest workers in each corporation I worked for. PGE,
Exxon, and Tractebell to name a few. I was a Mark to Market analyst.

All of this is details and you're trying to find a small one to break
the thread. you have not.
It boils down to this. WTC7, which was never hit by a plane, which had
similar buildings nearer to the WTC1 & 2 which did not fall, which
Silverstein told the firemen to "pull", which people where seen on a
video stating it was going to fall, which had all the telltales signs
of a controlled demolition, FELL. It was a controlled
demolition...period. The government can in no way explain and as of yet
they have not.

BrentB

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 11:55:05 PM10/31/06
to

StubbyElvis wrote:
> BrentB wrote:

>
> 5 million is nothing in the options/futures market. and there's
> imbalances all the time on any given day. arbitrage traders routinely
> trade blocks of index derivatives worth hundreds of millions simply
> based on black-scholes calculations.
>

Nice try...yes as a whole it's not much but when we're talking about a
specific company it can be. especially if there a huge swing in the
price which there was. you know better than that.

Vernon

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 8:57:10 AM11/1/06
to

"StubbyElvis" <webm...@101click.com> wrote in message
news:1162354320.8...@e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...


Gosh, you mean to say that an international plot involving something in the
order of 600 to 700 million dollars and requiring the knowledge by thousands
of people making about 4 - 5 million is a bad investment? Don't tell
Brent. But, then, again EVERYONE knows how stupid the Israelites are.


Vernon

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 9:05:26 AM11/1/06
to

"StubbyElvis" <webm...@101click.com> wrote in message
news:1162352630.3...@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Limbaugh is an entertainer. The problem is that in his satire, he gets way
too close to the ignorant truth of many in the U.S. Personally, I can take
about 2 or 3 minutes and have to switch stations.

Ann Coulter HAS to be part of the group that downed WTC, she has made way
more money with her books than the stock trading by those nasty Israelites.
Imagine making that much money in a couple years just by pulling the tail of
an ass. It is really fun to watch.

Vernon

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 9:07:33 AM11/1/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162356905....@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

To very small minds, anything seems large.


Vernon

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 9:14:39 AM11/1/06
to

"RosieBush" <BigR...@Rosiesbush.net> wrote in message
news:e8b48$45481b4f$438c0976$26...@ALLTEL.NET...

> Yes, how hard can it be to find a seven foot tall man,that needs dialisis.
> I must say after watching video's,I myself say the buildings were
> detinated,by explosives.
>

And you are an architect or have worked around them?
You have worked with demolition people?
SURE

And you have seen exact replications of the tower construction demonstrated
as unsafe in any area subject to earth tremors.
They collapsed in a classic manner.

It is unconscionable to construct a building that tall with only horizontal
and vertical beams.

BrentB

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 9:22:50 AM11/1/06
to

What are you blabbering about. It's not about these investments it's
about guess what? oil. We now have bases all around the oil pipelines
in Iraq. Israel has america in a war against their enemy. You probably
believe there were WMDs don't you? Stop getting your news from FOX. It
rots your brain.

Sdores

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 10:14:32 AM11/1/06
to

"Vernon" <anere@anhere> wrote in message
news:4548a7af$0$17411$882e...@news.ThunderNews.com...

>
> Gosh, you mean to say that an international plot involving something in
> the order of 600 to 700 million dollars and requiring the knowledge by
> thousands of people making about 4 - 5 million is a bad investment?
> Don't tell Brent. But, then, again EVERYONE knows how stupid the
> Israelites are.
Nice comment at the end, NOT! Your an idiot evn with you thinking you know
everything about everything! UM MOM Susan


BrentB

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 10:16:57 AM11/1/06
to

Vernon wrote:
> "RosieBush" <BigR...@Rosiesbush.net> wrote in message

>


> It is unconscionable to construct a building that tall with only horizontal
> and vertical beams.

What other type beams are there?

7 World Trade Center
The Mysterious Leveling of Building 7
This image, showing the site of WTC 7, is a small portion of a large
high-resolution photograph taken by an airplane flying at 3,300 feet on
September 23, 2001. It appears that much of the building's remains have
already been removed.

At 5:20 PM on 9/11/01 the only building with a World Trade Center
address that stood on a different block from the rest of the complex,
47-story steel-framed 7 World Trade Center, underwent a sudden total
collapse. Officials and all government reports published since the
attack that mention the building blame its collapse on a combination of
structural damage and subsequent fires. However, the available evidence
on the condition of Building 7 prior to its collapse fails to document
more than superficial structural damage (from the "collapses" of the
Twin Towers) and small isolated fires.

The official explanations of WTC 7's collapse are problematic for
several reasons:

* Fire has never caused any steel-framed high-rise building to
collapse in any manner, let alone with the vertical precision of
Building 7's destruction. 1 Other steel-framed skyscrapers have
experienced far more serious fires than Building 7.
* WTC 7 fell straight down, which necessitated that all of the
load-bearing columns be broken at the same moment. Inflicting such
damage with the precision required to prevent a building from toppling
and damaging adjacent buildings is what the science of controlled
demolition is all about. No random events, such as the debris damage
and fires envisioned by the official reports, or explosions from fuel
tanks proposed by some, could be expected to result in such a tidy and
complete collapse.
* The collapse of WTC 7 exhibited all of the features of a standard
controlled demolition. To suppose that a cause other than controlled
demolition could produce an event with all of the features uniquely
characteristic of controlled demolition defies logic.

FEMA on Building 7

Despite the inescapable logic of the above, the official theory for the
collapse, as published in Chapter 5 of the FEMA report goes as follows:

* At 9:59 AM (after the South Tower collapse), electrical power to
the substations in WTC 7 was shut off.
* Due to a design flaw, generators in WTC 7 started up by
themselves.
* Debris from the collapsing North Tower breached a fuel oil pipe
in a room in the north side of the building. (This means the debris had
to travel across WTC 6 and Vesey Street -- a distance of at least 355
feet -- penetrate the outer wall of WTC 6, and smash through about 50
feet of the building, including a concrete masonry wall.)
* This, and other debris (that also made the journey across
Building 6 and Vesey Street), managed to start numerous fires in the
building. (Unfortunately, this event did not prompt anyone to turn off
the generators.)
* The backup mechanism (that should have shut off the fuel oil
pumps when a breach occurred) failed to work, and the fuel oil (diesel)
was pumped from the tanks on the ground floor to the fifth floor where
it ignited. The pumps emptied the tanks of all 12,000 gallons of fuel.
* The extant fires raised the temperature of the spilled fuel oil
to the 140 degrees F required for it to ignite.
* The sprinkler system malfunctioned and failed to extinguish the
fire.
* The burning diesel fuel heated trusses to the point where they
lost most of their strength, precipitating a total collapse of Building
7.

The last point is the greatest stretch, since it asks us to believe
that an event that would be expected only to cause the sagging of a
floor instead led not only to total collapse, but to such a tidy
collapse that directly adjacent buildings were scarcely even damaged.
This is surprising behavior for a steel-framed skyscraper designed to
survive fires, hurricanes, and earthquakes.

After laying out this highly improbable scenario, the FEMA report
authors conclude:
The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to
collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on
the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis
has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research,
investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue.

Unfortunately for investigators hoping to resolve this issue, nearly
all of the evidence had already been destroyed by the time the FEMA
report was published.
Documents and Command Center Destroyed

At the time of its destruction, Building 7 housed documents relating to
numerous SEC investigations. The files for approximately three to four
thousand cases were destroyed, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Among the destroyed documents were ones that may have demonstrated the
relationship between Citigroup and the WorldCom bankruptcy. 2

Perhaps even more interesting than the loss of these case files is the
fact that WTC 7's collapse destroyed the OEM's command center on the
23rd floor

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc7/index.html

Vernon

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 11:55:57 AM11/1/06
to

"Sdores" <sdo...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:zR22h.18538$Fd7....@bignews6.bellsouth.net...

I assume you thought I was serious.
I was stating what many actually think, assuming they have the capability of
thinking.

Jew haters are all alike.


Vernon

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 12:10:52 PM11/1/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162394217.1...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

>
> Vernon wrote:
>> "RosieBush" <BigR...@Rosiesbush.net> wrote in message
>
>>
>> It is unconscionable to construct a building that tall with only
>> horizontal
>> and vertical beams.
>
> What other type beams are there?
>


What a clod.
Even a highschool student knows what other type beams there are other than
vertical and horizontal.
Get an education and find out how real buildings are built and how even a
three story building is often built in the Southwest and always in S. Cal.


w w
w w
w w
w

The above is not horizontal or vertical. Those cants ( note not Jewish
Cantor) are what is used in real construction.

Oh just for you, here is a definition of cant.
1. a salient angle.
2. a sudden movement that tilts or overturns a thing.
3. a slanting or tilted position.
4. an oblique line or surface, as one formed by cutting off the corner
of a square of cube.
5. an oblique or slanting face of anything.
6. Civil Engineering. (def. 6).
7. a sudden pitch or toss.
8. Also called flitch. a partly trimmed log.
-adjective 9. oblique or slanting.
-verb (used with object) 10. to bevel; form an oblique surface upon.
11. to put in an oblique position; tilt; tip.
12. to throw with a sudden jerk.
-verb (used without object) 13. to take or have an inclined position; tilt;
turn.

NOT HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL

You can copy print all you want and you cannot overcome the thousands of
EXPERT architects and demolition experts that have a good laugh at your
quoted idiocy.


BrentB

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 12:29:09 PM11/1/06
to

I'm not an expert nor never claimed to be. I Iet the BYU physics
professors among many others do the science. PLEASE for the hundreth
time back up your claims on the thousands of EXPERTS. If you can't then
your a proven LIAR. I'll await your answer.

Vernon

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 1:39:33 PM11/1/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162402149.7...@e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

Let's see.

1. There are thousands of architectural engineers. (of course you wouldn't
know that) (Do a web search)
2. There are about a thousand demolition companies, filled with experts.
(of course you wouldn't know that either) (Do a web search)
3. Both of the above work, not theorize, in the field. (Now that premise is
way above your head or an EX BYU PHYSICS teacher)
4. It's hard to imagine any who missed seeing the films. (Another premise
also above your head)
5. None of these have come forward to even suggest any collusion. (Why
would they go out of their way to say what happened was AS presented?)

Bush is not God.
Bush is not omnipotent
The CIA / FBI at the time was no where near being controlled or formulated
by any existing government. (officially they were, but they had become
nearly independent of administration)
There have been plenty of retirees, new job people from the agencies, many
disgruntled and ONE makes a dumb claim.

Oh, I forgot, you people think the Jews are actually in control and have
eliminated all dissidents.


StubbyElvis

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 2:02:39 PM11/1/06
to
The above is not horizontal or vertical. Those cants ( note not Jewish

Cantor) are what is used in real construction.

========================

LMAO .... that's good!

I'd like to see someone like Vernon get a show on Comedy Central or HBO
as a counter-point to Jon Stewart/Bill Maher

BrentB

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 2:02:47 PM11/1/06
to

I never claimed anything about Jews in control. Kindly stick that BS
back up your ass. I'm not searching anything. You made the claim and
apparently you cannot back it up. I'm not surprised. As far as the BYU
proffesor he resigned to continue his work. Thats all the time I plan
on wasting on you. btw Vernon tell your bosses they aint getting away
with it...the list of patriots will grow.

50 Senior Military, Intelligence, & Govt. Critics of 9/11 Commission

Berg, Philip J. - Deputy Attorney General, Pennsylvania
Bowman, Col. Robert - Director of Advanced Space Programs Development
under Presidents Ford and Carter
Burks, Fred - State Department Interpreter for Presidents George W.
Bush and Bill Clinton
Christison, William - Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and
Political Analysis
Cleland, Senator Max - Member of the 9/11 Commission. Former U.S.
Senator from Georgia
Cole, John M - Intelligence Operations Specialist, FBI
Conrad, David Mark - Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs
Costello, Edward J. - Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBI
Dew, Rosemary N. - Supervisory Special Agent, Counterterrorism &
Counterintelligence, FBI
Dzakovic, Bogdan - Counterterrorism expert, FAA
Edmonds, Sibel - Language Translation Specialist, FBI
Elson, Steve - Special Agent, FAA
Fitts, Catherine Austin - Assistant Secretary of Housing under George
H.W. Bush
Freeh, Louis - Director of the FBI, 1993 - 2001
Goodman, Melvin - Division Chief and Senior Analyst of Soviet Affairs,
CIA
Goulder, Morton - Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under
Presidents Nixon, Ford, Carter
Graf, Mark - Security Supervisor, Department of Energy
Graham, Gilbert M. - Special Agent, Counterintelligence, FBI
Heikal, Mohamed Hassanein - Foreign Minister, Egypt
Hellyer, Paul - Minister of National Defense and Deputy Prime Minister,
Canada
Honegger, Barbara - White House Policy Analyst Under Ronald Reagan
Ivashov, Gen. Leonid - Chief of Staff of the Russian Armed Forces
Kleiman, Diane - Special Agent, U.S. Customs
Kwiatkowski, Lt. Col. Karen - Political Military Affairs Officer,
Office of the Secretary of Defense
Larkin, Lynne A. - Operation Officer, CIA
MacMichael, David - Senior Estimates Officer, CIA
McGovern, Raymond L. - Chairman, National Intelligence Estimates, CIA
Meacher, Michael - Undersecretary for Industry, Minister for the
Environment, UK
Nelson, Col. George - U.S. Air Force aircraft crash investigator
Pahle, Theodore J. - Senior Intelligence Officer, Defense Intelligence
Agency
Peck, Edward L. - Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on
Terrorism under Ronald Reagan
Ray, Col. Ronald D. - Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under
Ronald Reagan
Reynolds, Morgan - Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Labor under
George W. Bush
Ritter, Maj. Scott - Marine Corps Intelligence Officer and Chief UN
Weapons Inspector in Iraq
Roberts, Paul Craig - Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury under
Ronald Reagan
Rokke, Maj. Douglas - Director U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Project
Sarshar, Behrooz - Language Translation Specialist, FBI
Shayler, David - Counterterrorism Agent, MI5 (UK)
Stubblebine, Maj. Gen. Albert - Commanding General, U.S. Army
Intelligence
Sullivan, Brian F. - Special Agent and Risk Management Specialist, FAA
Tortorich, Larry J. - US Naval Officer and Dept. of Homeland Security
Turner, Jane A. - Special Agent, FBI
Vincent, John B. - Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBI
von Buelow, Andreas - Minister of National Defense, West Germany
Weldon, Rep. Curt - Vice Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee
Whitehurst, Dr. Fred - Supervisory Special Agent, Forensic Examiner,
FBI
Wittenberg, Capt. Russ - Air Force Fighter Pilot and Commercial Jet
Pilot
Wright, Col. Ann - U.S. Army and Former Diplomat
Zipoli, Matthew J. - Special Response Team Officer, Department of
Energy
http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 7:06:24 PM11/1/06
to
BrentB wrote:

> Mark Probert wrote:
>> Vernon wrote:
>>> "BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1162305066.4...@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

>>>> Vernon wrote:
>>>>> "BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

Nice wacky conspiracy theory that does not address the facts.

> Why jump in? Not trying to defend Israel now are you?

Do you have a point to make?

> Between August 26 and September 11, 2001 a group of speculators from
> Israel sold 'short' a list of 38 stocks that could reasonably be
> expected to fall in value as a result of the pending attacks.
> Investigations as to who they were by the SEC, DoJ and the FBI have
> mysteriously stopped dead in their tracks. Also...remember those
> celebrating Mossad agents during the attack?

Oh, I see. You seem to "THINK" that Israel was somehow responsible.

Before this post, I just thought you were stupid. Now I know you are a
moron.


Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 7:09:48 PM11/1/06
to
BrentB wrote:
> StubbyElvis wrote:
>> you convinced me, brent. it was the "a group of speculators from
>> Israel sold 'short' a list of 38 stocks ," that finally opened my eyes.
>> there's NO WAY a group of stock speculators would be short stocks!!
>> thanks for setting things straight.
>
> The point is we can't find out who they are. Some money even went into
> an unmarked account and it's still there. Millions...nope nothing
> strange about that.

Plenty strange...since it is not possible to confirm your conjecture.

>> just curious: what's a mastermind like yourself do for a living?
>> what's your educational background?
>
> none of your fucking business.

Uh-oh...a bad word. So, you do not want to admit your are a paid
bullshit artist?

>> keep up the greay work!
>

> keep being an anonymous whore on a Lyme newsgroup and saying NOTHING
> about lyme! I've had lyme and now I need to re-learn thousands of
> words...It's a symptom. Making fun of those with a disease...you must
> be a Rush Limbaugh fan.

Just admit that Lyme caused your brain damage to allow you to believe
these bullshit conspiracies. I'll be on your side.

>> p.s. why didn't the Israeli stock traders buy the puts or write naked
>> calls instead of merely selling the equity short?
>
> be nice if we could ask them huh?

Zoooooooooooooooooooooom...you missed the point....do you know anything
about stock trading?

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 7:14:31 PM11/1/06
to
StubbyElvis wrote:
> BrentB wrote:
>> StubbyElvis wrote:
>>> you convinced me, brent. it was the "a group of speculators from
>>> Israel sold 'short' a list of 38 stocks ," that finally opened my eyes.
>>> there's NO WAY a group of stock speculators would be short stocks!!
>>> thanks for setting things straight.
>>>
>> Sense you're interested.
>>
>> "Selling Short" is the borrowing of stock, selling it at current
>> market prices, but not being required to actually produce the stock for
>> some time. If the stock falls precipitously after the short contract is
>> entered, the seller can then fulfill the contract by buying the stock
>> after the price has fallen and complete the contract at the pre-crash
>> price. These contracts often have a window of as long as four months.
>
>
> LOL I used to trade derivatives for Bear Stearns. I'm series 7 and 63.

Thought so. I cannot explain the mechanism of stock trading, so I did
not jump in. However, your points are right on. The whole stock selling
yarn is utter bullshit.

Could you take a moment to fully explain why selling short as alleged by
BrentB is absurd in this case?

Use small words.

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 7:15:54 PM11/1/06
to
Could you explain how? Where did you get your expertise?

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 7:18:00 PM11/1/06
to


Vernon, could you email me at mark{dot}probert{at}gmail{dot}com?

BrentB

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 8:55:05 PM11/1/06
to

No, I never said that. I think silverstein knew, I think there are
those in Israel who knew. Who they are and how much the knew is
speculation.

BrentB

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 9:03:05 PM11/1/06
to

Mark Probert wrote:
(snip tired BS)

>
> Just admit that Lyme caused your brain damage to allow you to believe
> these bullshit conspiracies. I'll be on your side.
>

So are you stating all these people have brain damage due to Lyme? Are
they all morons?

BrentB

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 11:38:23 PM11/1/06
to

Mark Probert wrote:
> StubbyElvis wrote:
> > BrentB wrote:
> >> StubbyElvis wrote:
> >>> you convinced me, brent. it was the "a group of speculators from
> >>> Israel sold 'short' a list of 38 stocks ," that finally opened my eyes.
> >>> there's NO WAY a group of stock speculators would be short stocks!!
> >>> thanks for setting things straight.
> >>>
> >> Sense you're interested.
> >>
> >> "Selling Short" is the borrowing of stock, selling it at current
> >> market prices, but not being required to actually produce the stock for
> >> some time. If the stock falls precipitously after the short contract is
> >> entered, the seller can then fulfill the contract by buying the stock
> >> after the price has fallen and complete the contract at the pre-crash
> >> price. These contracts often have a window of as long as four months.
> >
> >
> > LOL I used to trade derivatives for Bear Stearns. I'm series 7 and 63.
>
> Thought so. I cannot explain the mechanism of stock trading, so I did
> not jump in. However, your points are right on. The whole stock selling
> yarn is utter bullshit.
>
> Could you take a moment to fully explain why selling short as alleged by
> BrentB is absurd in this case?
>
> Use small words.
>

You missed it. I caught him trying to obfuscate the issue. Know what a
Mark to Maket analyst is? I'll explain it as soon as you answer my
question concerning patriotic morons.

StubbyElvis

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 12:36:21 AM11/2/06
to

>
> Could you take a moment to fully explain why selling short as alleged by
> BrentB is absurd in this case?
>
> Use small words.
>


What's absurd is not the selling short. But the size and type of
trade that BrentB offers as suspect irregularity is laughable. It is a
very common trade that occurs many times every day. Also, there are
many other types of trading vehicles that someone would use to take
advantage of higher leverage if he had a "sure thing."

Let me make a comparison to everyday events to illustrate the absurdity
of BrentB's contention. Let's say there was a truck going 20 mph over
the speed limit that was stopped by a cop as it headed out of NYC.
Let's say that this incident occured only 10 minutes before the planes
hit the WTC. Then let's say officer BrentB implicates the truck driver
in the WTC attack based on the following facts:

1) The truck was heading OUT of NYC.
2) The truck was going over the speed limit!
3) The truck was owned by an Israeli company!

The comparison is a bit strained, but you get the idea of the loose
parameters BrentB is using as damning circumstantial evidence.

JohnDoe

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 2:53:31 AM11/2/06
to
BrentB wrote:

What, not the loosechange site?

Sdores

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 7:29:24 AM11/2/06
to
"StubbyElvis" <webm...@101click.com> wrote in message
news:1162352630.3...@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

> >
>
> My name is Mark Draper. I live in North Palm Beach, FL. My email is
> webmaster @101click.com You can look up the DNS registratration and
> confirm my identity. F' it....call me on the phone if ya like. But
> to any action-conspiracy-freaks who dare mess w/ me, let it be known
> that I do exercise my Second Amendment rights. Now it's your turn to
> show me what an anonymous ahole is all about. What's you name and
> address?
>
> I'm truly sorry about your condition. Very glad you are getting
> better.
> Could Lyme cause paranoia? Not being a smartass w/ that question.
>
> I think Limbaugh is a blow hard. But if you'd like something to sink
> your hate into, let it be known I'm a big Ann Coulter fan.
>
> God Bless,
> Mark (aka "Joel")

In case you didn't know, and which you probably do, NEVER give out personal
information like you just did. It's not safe to do. People actually do
come to you, call employers and/or friends, or do all kinds of unsafe
things. You can delete this in Google but it probably wouldn't help. Try
to be safe. Am I worried about this stalking kind of stuff, you bet.

Anyways, on a different note, I am in South FL. Don't you love the weather
we finally are getting? Right now it's early but I am hoping that the
humidity is low. It's been so sticky and hot. I have to work today and
part of it is outside measuring so cool, low humidity would be very welcomed
by me.

Did you go to school down here? The reason I ask is your name sounds very
familiar to me. I was raised in S. FL and even had my son at Good Sams many
years ago. UM MOM Susan

>


BrentB

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 8:34:54 AM11/2/06
to

No Longer The Minority: 82% Plus Support Charlie Sheen
Over four-fifths back his public stance on 9/11

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | March 24 2006

Despite the best efforts of the now whimpering attack poodles of the
mainstream media, an online CNN poll shows that over four-fifths, or 82
per cent, agree with actor Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government
covered up the real events of the 9/11 attacks.

Every establishment media mouthpiece aside from CNN tried to hang Sheen
on his own words but it simply didn't work because those same questions
are firing the synapses in the heads of millions upon millions of other
taxpaying American citizens.

We are now in the majority and the cynics are beginning to feel the
breeze of fear as they desperately cling to ignorant dogmas spoon fed
to them by an empire in descent, while in the back of their mind and in
their soul knowing that they have sided with the wrong team and the
wrong side of history.

As of Friday morning you can still vote in the poll and I encourage you
to do so by clicking here. A.J. Hammer and CNN Showbiz Tonight need to
be given their due as the only mainstream television news show to give
balanced coverage of serious 9/11 questions.

This is a watershed moment in the struggle to create a powerful,
educated and active contingent of individuals with no hierarchical
structure but with a unified cause.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/sheen_cnn_poll_shows_82_percent_support.htm

Vernon

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 8:48:53 AM11/2/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162432985.1...@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

>
> Mark Probert wrote:
> (snip tired BS)
>>
>> Just admit that Lyme caused your brain damage to allow you to believe
>> these bullshit conspiracies. I'll be on your side.
>>
>
> So are you stating all these people have brain damage due to Lyme? Are
> they all morons?
>
> 50 Senior Military, Intelligence, & Govt. Critics of 9/11 Commission
>


Almost for certain.

None that you list have any real credibility in engineering or demolition.

They seem to be suffering from some disease.


Vernon

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 8:53:34 AM11/2/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162474494.7...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...

You have no clue what sell short is. You fell for a story designed to
illustrate what fools you and your kind are.

>
> No Longer The Minority: 82% Plus Support Charlie Sheen
> Over four-fifths back his public stance on 9/11
>
> Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | March 24 2006
>
> Despite the best efforts of the now whimpering attack poodles of the
> mainstream media, an online CNN poll shows that over four-fifths, or 82
> per cent, agree with actor Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government
> covered up the real events of the 9/11 attacks.
>


Oh sure Charlie Sheen, another engineer (taught by Barbra Streisand)


Vernon

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 8:56:32 AM11/2/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162432505....@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Yep, people all over the world knew and no one else knew. But then again
those people are all powerful gods called demons.


BrentB

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 12:05:05 PM11/2/06
to

lol vern...I expected that type of answer from you. That's why I didn't
ask YOU the question.

Vernon

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 1:43:50 PM11/2/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162487104....@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

They have no credibility in the subject, other than that disgruntled
liberals or ex employees.


BrentB

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 1:49:52 PM11/2/06
to

Now Stubby it would be a bit obvious if they made billions of dollars
off of it don't you think? Are you in with Vernon on this theory that
the 50 reputable people who are critics of 9-11 have some sort of
disease? this is funny!

Vernon

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 2:17:43 PM11/2/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162493392.3...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...

Thousands of "reputable" people put Hitler into power, but when it came to
science and engineering, they actually performed.
Those same "reputable" people said almost the identical trash your
"reputable" people say. Claims of conspiracies, bad America, bad England,
bad Jews, bad capitalists.


BrentB

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 5:20:38 PM11/2/06
to

Sooo...what your saying is...these "reputable" people are really evil
nazis in disguise?

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 6:01:21 PM11/2/06
to
Sdores wrote:
> "StubbyElvis" <webm...@101click.com> wrote in message
> news:1162352630.3...@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> My name is Mark Draper. I live in North Palm Beach, FL. My email is
>> webmaster @101click.com You can look up the DNS registratration and
>> confirm my identity. F' it....call me on the phone if ya like. But
>> to any action-conspiracy-freaks who dare mess w/ me, let it be known
>> that I do exercise my Second Amendment rights. Now it's your turn to
>> show me what an anonymous ahole is all about. What's you name and
>> address?
>>
>> I'm truly sorry about your condition. Very glad you are getting
>> better.
>> Could Lyme cause paranoia? Not being a smartass w/ that question.
>>
>> I think Limbaugh is a blow hard. But if you'd like something to sink
>> your hate into, let it be known I'm a big Ann Coulter fan.
>>
>> God Bless,
>> Mark (aka "Joel")
>
> In case you didn't know, and which you probably do, NEVER give out personal
> information like you just did. It's not safe to do. People actually do
> come to you, call employers and/or friends, or do all kinds of unsafe
> things. You can delete this in Google but it probably wouldn't help. Try
> to be safe. Am I worried about this stalking kind of stuff, you bet.

Good advice. I should know.

> Anyways, on a different note, I am in South FL. Don't you love the weather
> we finally are getting? Right now it's early but I am hoping that the
> humidity is low. It's been so sticky and hot. I have to work today and
> part of it is outside measuring so cool, low humidity would be very welcomed
> by me.

My friends in your area are more pleased about the lack of hurricanes
this year.

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 6:23:33 PM11/2/06
to

I did, numbnuts. Do make sure that you figure out a way to explain how
that website was able to get opinions from a dead president, and one
with advanced Alzheimer's.


Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 6:25:09 PM11/2/06
to

His parameters do no rise to circumstantial evidence.

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 6:31:48 PM11/2/06
to

SmurfBoy, your fallacious use of logic is astounding. Let's parse what
you typed...

You said "I think silverstein [sic] knew..."

You do acknowledge that this is conjecture, as you state "I think".
While it is debatable that you actually do "think" we'll assume that to
be a true statement, i.e., that you "think".

You then did the same exact thing when you stated "...I think there are

those in Israel who knew."

In both cases, you are clearly expressing your conjecture, and nothing
more.

Then you claim that "Who they are and how much they knew is
speculation." Of course, that statement assumes that 1) "they" exist and
2) that "they" knew something.

IOW, your statement is all mirrors, and quite circular. It holds as much
water as a Klein bottle.


Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 6:31:53 PM11/2/06
to
BrentB wrote:
> Mark Probert wrote:
> (snip tired BS)
>> Just admit that Lyme caused your brain damage to allow you to believe
>> these bullshit conspiracies. I'll be on your side.
>>
>
> So are you stating all these people have brain damage due to Lyme?

Where did you find that? There are many causes of brain damage.

Are
> they all morons?

I looked at your list. I checked some out. None of them have civil
engineering degrees or direct experience with imploding buildings.

A HS classmate of mine does. He has a MS in CE and has owned an
imploding company for over twenty years. Some of his handiwork is
featured on the Discovery Channel.

He knows my connections to the WTC, and the several of the people who
died. We had long discussions about the weirdo conspiracy theories. He
looked at every publicly available video of all three buildings
collapsing and told me that none of them were imploded. Not one.

I'll take his word over anyone else's.

I also took a look at the list with a view as to whether anyone on the
list would have their opinion, as you claim, publicly available. They are:

Louis Freeh
Jimmie Carter
Bill Clinton
Richard Nixon
Ronald Reagan

Now, go do some homework. Find actual proof that any one of these four
men bought into the yarns about 9/11 that you are shilling.

BTW, Being the really nice guy I am, let me point out that Nixon died in
1994. So, please make sure that whatever you cite about him, also make
sure that it documents how they learned of his opinion.

As for Ronald Reagan, by the time 9/11 happened, his Alzheimer's was
quite advanced and there was no public contact. Do find a way to get
around this hurdle.

That leave you with three. Good luck, and happy hunting.

What a maroon!

Sdores

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 6:32:02 PM11/2/06
to

"Mark Probert" <markp...@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:5Nu2h.4923$B44.3104@trndny07...

>>>
>>>
>
>
> My friends in your area are more pleased about the lack of hurricanes this
> year.
>>
Me too! Ernesto gave us a little scare early on but yes we are please, we
had enough the past two years. UM MOM Susan


BrentB

unread,
Nov 3, 2006, 9:25:22 AM11/3/06
to

Mark Probert wrote:
> BrentB wrote:
> > Mark Probert wrote:
> > (snip tired BS)
> >> Just admit that Lyme caused your brain damage to allow you to believe
> >> these bullshit conspiracies. I'll be on your side.
> >>
> >
> > So are you stating all these people have brain damage due to Lyme?
>
> Where did you find that? There are many causes of brain damage.
>
> Are
> > they all morons?
>

Just answer the question. You state that anyone who is a critic of the
9-11 government line is brain damaged and/or a moron. I will repeat the
question are all the 50 reputable people (imo) brain damaged and/or
morons. a simple yes or no will do.

BrentB

unread,
Nov 3, 2006, 9:33:45 AM11/3/06
to

Thats all fine and good. Shouldn't this be openly debated and looked
into, seeing as how most americans do not believe the government line?
Do the peoples voice count?

Vernon

unread,
Nov 3, 2006, 9:42:15 AM11/3/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162563922.3...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...

Yes.
There a LOT of them in the government and Universities.
More brain damaged / malfunction / cognitive aberration than simply moron.

Of course you expanded the line to ANYONE who is critical.
No one has stated any thing that can be construed as ANYONE WHO IS CRITICAL
of the 9-11 line.


BrentB

unread,
Nov 3, 2006, 10:08:44 AM11/3/06
to

Most people do not believe the government(see CNN and zogby polls) so I
suppose most americans are brain damaged morons who are brainwashed by
evil nazis trying to take over the world. I must assume Mark agrees
with your assesment due to his inability to answer the question.

Peter Bowditch

unread,
Nov 3, 2006, 10:21:27 AM11/3/06
to
"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote:

One of them, Ronald Reagan, probably could have been described as
"brain damaged", as he was in an advanced stage of Alzheimer's when he
was supposed to be giving a considered opinion on the matter. I don't
know whether Richard Nixon was either, what with him being dead at the
time.
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 3, 2006, 10:17:01 AM11/3/06
to

Didn't you claim that something like 82% of the American people believe
that there is a cover up? I could not find a credible reference to that.
Got one?

You should realize that I live in the area impacted by the WTC attacks.
I lost friends, neighbors, etc. as a result.

NO ONE I KNOW feels that there is a cover-up. The 9/11 Commission did a
superb job of investigating it. Did you read their report cover to
cover? I did. There were library discussions with many of the
participants being first responders who were there at the time. NONE
claim implosion or hearing explosions.

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 3, 2006, 10:20:30 AM11/3/06
to
BrentB wrote:
> Mark Probert wrote:
>> BrentB wrote:
>>> Mark Probert wrote:
>>> (snip tired BS)
>>>> Just admit that Lyme caused your brain damage to allow you to believe
>>>> these bullshit conspiracies. I'll be on your side.
>>>>
>>> So are you stating all these people have brain damage due to Lyme?
>> Where did you find that? There are many causes of brain damage.
>>
>> Are
>>> they all morons?
>
> Just answer the question.

No, and I see no proof that they hold that opinion. You dishonestly
snipped my comments about how that list is incredibly flawed.

You state that anyone who is a critic of the
> 9-11 government line is brain damaged and/or a moron. I will repeat the
> question are all the 50 reputable people (imo) brain damaged and/or
> morons. a simple yes or no will do.

Do prove, as I asked, that those on the list hold the opinion you claim
that they do. I'll cut and past my comments and the list for your
convenience. Here it is, with my comments. Do try to actually address
the flaws.

BrentB

unread,
Nov 3, 2006, 10:51:07 AM11/3/06
to

Here is the list of critics and their comments. I did not see Ronal
Reagan on the list but I did see those who worked for him. Are these
people reputable or are they brain damaged nazis trying to take over
the country as Vernon claims? (third time asked and not answered).


FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

Congressman Curt Weldon, "What's the Sept. 11 commission got to hide?"

Rep. Curt Weldon


Rep. Curt Weldon - Vice Chairman of the House Homeland Security
Committee, Vice Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.
Ten-term Republican Congressman from Pennsylvania.

* Fox News Article 8/28/05: Regarding the 9/11 Commission "There's
something very sinister going on here that really troubles me," Weldon
told FOX News on Thursday, blasting the Sept. 11 commission for not
taking the claims more seriously. He said some panel members were
trying to smear Shaffer and Able Danger. "What's the Sept. 11
commission got to hide?" Weldon asked." http://www.foxnews.com/...


* Press conference transcript 9/17/05: Regarding the 9/11
Commission Report "There's something wrong here, something tragically
wrong. The American people, the families, the country and the Congress
need to know the truth, the whole truth, the complete truth. And so far
we haven't gotten it. ... Somebody's got to connect the dots and answer
the questions. If the 9/11 Commission won't do it, then Congress has to
do it." http://www.globalresearch.ca/...


* Bio: http://curtweldon.house.gov/Biography/

Max Cleland, The 9/11 Commission is a national scandal.

Senator Max Cleland


Senator Max Cleland - Former member of the 9/11 Commission, resigned
in December 2003. Currently serves on the board of directors of the
Export-Import Bank of the United States. U.S. Senator from Georgia
1996-2002. Secretary of State of Georgia 1982-1996. Administrator of
the U.S. Veterans Administration 1977-1981. Captain, U.S. Army awarded
Silver Star and Bronze Star for bravery in Viet Nam. Triple amputee
from war injuries.

* Boston Globe Article 11/13/03: "If this decision stands [to limit
access to White House documents], I, as a member of the commission,
cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of
victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is
now compromised." http://www./...


* Salon Article 11/21/03: Regarding the 9/11 Commission "It is a
national scandal." http://dir.salon.com/...


* Resigned from the 9/11 Commission, 12/03


* Transcript of audio interview 3/23/04: "One of these days we will
have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to
America. But this White House wants to cover it up."
http://www.democracynow.org/...


* Bio: http://memory.loc.gov/...

Mark Dayton

Senator Mark Dayton


Senator Mark Dayton - Senate Committee on Armed Services, Senate
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Services. U.S. Senator
from Minnesota.

* Senate Hearings on the 9/11 Commission Report 7/31/04: "They
[NORAD] lied to the American people, they lied to Congress and they
lied to your 9/11 Commission. ... For almost three years now NORAD
officials and FAA officials have been able to hide their critical
failures that left this country defenseless during two of the worst
hours in our history." http://www.911truth


* Editor's note: On August 1, 2006, Thomas Kean, Chairman of the
9/11 Commission said, "We, to this day, don't know why NORAD [the North
American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us. It was just so
far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got
tied." Link Despite the many public statements by 9/11 Commissioners
and staff members acknowledging they were repeatedly lied to, not a
single person has ever been charged, tried, or even reprimanded for
lying to the 9/11 Commission.


* Article: "Dayton, a former Minnesota state auditor, called the
FAA's and NORAD's failures "the most gross incompetence and dereliction
of responsibility and negligence that I've ever, under those extreme
circumstances, witnessed in the public sector." http://www.9111


* Bio: http://dayton.senate.gov/about/biography.cfm

Louis Freeh


Louis Freeh - Director of the FBI, 1993-2001. Former U.S. District
Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, appointed by
President George H.W. Bush. Former Deputy United States Attorney in
New York. Former FBI agent. Former officer in the United States Army
JAG Corps Reserve.

* Wall Street Journal Essay 11/17/05: "Even the most junior
investigator would immediately know that the name and photo ID of Atta
in 2000 is precisely the kind of tactical intelligence the FBI has many
times employed to prevent attacks and arrest terrorists. Yet the 9/11
Commission inexplicably concluded that it "was not historically
significant." This astounding conclusion--in combination with the
failure to investigate Able Danger and incorporate it into its
findings--raises serious challenges to the commission's credibility
and, if the facts prove out, might just render the commission
historically insignificant itself. ... No wonder the 9/11 families were
outraged by these revelations and called for a "new" commission to
investigate." http://www.opin/...


* Bio: http://www.fbi.gov/libref/directors/freeh.htm

Ambassador Edward Peck, We request an immediate re-investigation of
9/11

Edward L. Peck


Edward L. Peck - Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on
Terrorism under Ronald Reagan. Former Deputy Coordinator, Covert
Intelligence Programs at the State Department. U.S. Ambassador and
Chief of Mission to Iraq (1977-80). 32-year veteran of the Foreign
Service.

* Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers to question. ... As Americans of
conscience, we ask for four things:
o An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General
Eliot Spitzer
o Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
o Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
o The formation of a truly independent citizens-based
inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article. ...


* Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Peck

Morton Goulder


Morton Goulder - Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Intelligence and Warning under Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter
(1973-77). Founder of Sanders Associates.

* Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers to question. ... As Americans of
conscience, we ask for four things:
o An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General
Eliot Spitzer
o Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
o Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
o The formation of a truly independent citizens-based
inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article. ...

Morgan Reynolds, "We can prove the government's story is false."

Morgan Reynolds


Morgan Reynolds, PhD - Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Labor
under George W. Bush 2001-2002. Former Director of the Criminal
Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis. Professor
Emeritus, Economics, Texas A&M University.

* Video: "I first began to suspect that 9/11 was in inside job when
the Bush-Cheney Administration invaded Iraq. ... We can prove that the
government's story is false." http://video.goo...


* Essay: "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific
debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and
building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I
believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis
is not likely [to] prove to be sound." http://www.l...


* Bio: http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=bio

Paul Craig Roberts


Paul Craig Roberts, PhD - Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury
under Ronald Reagan, "Father of Reaganomics", Former Associate Editor
of the Wall Street Journal. Currently Chairman of the Institute for
Political Economy and Research Fellow at the Independent Institute.

* Essay: "We know that it is strictly impossible for any building,
much less steel columned buildings, to "pancake" at free fall speed.
Therefore, it is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation
of the collapse of the WTC buildings is false."
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/...


* Essay: "There are not many editors eager for writers to explore
the glaring defects of the 9/11 Commission Report. One would think that
if the report could stand analysis, there would not be a taboo against
calling attention to the inadequacy of its explanations."
http://www.counterpunc....


* Bio: http://www.vdare.com/roberts/bio.htm

Catherine Austin Fitts, "The Commission was a whitewash."

Catherine Austin Fitts


Catherine Austin Fitts - Assistant Secretary of Housing under George
H.W. Bush. Former Managing Director and Member of the Board of Wall
Street investment bank, Dillon, Read & Co

* Audio Interview 9/9/04: Regarding 9/11 "The official story could
not possibly have happened... It's not possible. It's not
operationally feasible... The Commission was a whitewash." (About 45
minutes into the file.) http://157....


* Essay: "The first category of people who benefited were those who
are guilty and complicit in designing, implementing and financing the
9-11 operation. On such a sophisticated and successful covert
operation, the people responsible would have had budgets and financing
and would have organized the operation to maximize their political and
financial benefits." http://globalresearch.ca/...


* Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11.
http://www.911truth.org/article ...


* Bio: http://www.solari.com/about/ca_fitts.html

John Loftus

John Loftus


John Loftus - Former investigator and Federal Prosecutor, Office of
Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents
Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Former U.S. Army Intelligence officer.
Currently author and frequent media commentator on terrorism and
intelligence services.

* Article 9/6/03: "The information provided by European
intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no
longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defence of
incompetence." http://www.guardian.co.


* Bio: http://www.harrywalker.com...

Fred Burks, "How is it possible that our military's highly touted
missile detections systems could not locate Flight 77 in the 42 minutes
it was known to be lost before it crashed into the heart of the defense
system of the U.S.?"

Fred Burks


Fred Burks - Former State Department Interpreter for Presidents
George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, Vice Presidents Dick Cheney and Al
Gore, Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Madeleine Albright.
18-year State Department career.

* Essay: "How is it possible that our military's highly touted
missile detections systems could not locate Flight 77 in the 42 minutes
it was known to be lost before it crashed into the heart of the defense
system of the U.S.? ...

An even bigger question is why isn't our media asking these
questions? Why isn't our military spending many millions of dollars to
find out why military defense systems failed on 9/11? Why is it that
the 9/11 commission budget was far less than the budget allotted to the
Challenger Disaster or even the Monika Lewinsky
affair?"http://www.wanttoknow.info/911star...


* Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11.
http://www.911truth.org/...

Daniel Ellsberg

Daniel Ellsberg, PhD - Former Special Assistant to the Assistant
Secretary of Defense. Former State Department envoy to Viet Nam. While
working for the government, Ellsberg attained the ultimate civil
service grade of GS-18, equivalent to a Major General. Former U.S.
Marine Corps officer. Former military analyst for the Rand Corporation.
Most well known for leaking the Pentagon Papers to the New York Times
in 1971.

* Interview 7/14/06: Regarding 9/11 "There is no question in my
mind, that there is enough evidence to justify a very comprehensive and
hard hitting investigation of the kind we have not seen. With
subpoenas, general questioning of people, releasing a lot of documents.
There's no question that very serious questions have been raised
about how much they knew before hand and how much involvement there may
have been." http://www.infowars


* Bio: http://www.ellsberg.net/bio.html

Philip Berg, "The official story of what actually took place on 9-11
is a lie."

Philip J. Berg


Philip J. Berg, Esquire - Former Deputy Attorney General, State of
Pennsylvania.

* Article: "The official story of what actually took place on 9-11
is a lie." http://www.americanfreepress.net/...


* Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers to question. ... As Americans of
conscience, we ask for four things:
o An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General
Eliot Spitzer
o Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
o Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
o The formation of a truly independent citizens-based
inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...


* Bio: http://www.911forthetruth.com/...

U.S. MILITARY OFFICERS

Albert Stubblebine

Major General Albert Stubblebine


Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret) - Commanding
General of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1981-84.
Also commanded the U.S. Army's Electronic Research and Development
Command and the U.S. Army's Intelligence School and Center. Former
head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical
Intelligence. 32-year Army career.

* Video: "One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of
the Army's Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical
Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet
equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the
Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to
have hit the Pentagon. And I said, 'The plane does not fit in that
hole'. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's
going on?" http://www.und ...


* Bio: http://www.canadiansub.com/Board....

Colonel Ronald Ray, "I'm astounded that the conspiracy theory advanced
by the administration could in fact be true and the evidence does not
seem to suggest that's accurate."

Col. Ronald D. Ray


Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) - Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Defense during the Reagan Administration and a highly
decorated Vietnam veteran (two Silver Stars, a Bronze Star and a Purple
Heart). Appointed by President George H.W. Bush to serve on the
American Battle Monuments Commission (1990-1994), and on the 1992
Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces.
>From 1990 through 1994, he served as Military Historian and Deputy
Director of Field Operations for the U.S. Marine Corps Historical
Center, Washington, D.C.

* Article: "The former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under
the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran and
Colonel has gone on the record to voice his doubts about the official
story of 9/11 - calling it 'the dog that doesn't hunt.' 'I'm
astounded that the conspiracy theory advanced by the administration
could in fact be true and the evidence does not seem to suggest that's
accurate,' he said." http://www.pris/...


* Bio: http://www.firstprinciplespress.org/...

Colonel Robert Bowman, "A lot of these pieces of information, taken
together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory
of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It's impossible."

Col. Robert Bowman


Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) - Director of Advanced
Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air
Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics
and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech).

* Video: "A lot of these pieces of information, taken together,
prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11
is a bunch of hogwash. It's impossible. ... There's a second group
of facts having to do with the cover up. ... Taken together these
things prove that high levels of our government don't want us to know
what happened and who's responsible. ...


Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information about
9/11? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the
first place? When you take those three things together, I think the
case is pretty clear that it's highly placed individuals in the
administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney. I think the
very kindest thing that we can say about George W. Bush and all the
people in the U.S. Government that have been involved in this massive
cover-up, the very kindest thing we can say is that they were aware of
impending attacks and let them happen. Now some people will say
that's much too kind, however even that is high treason and
conspiracy to commit murder." http://video.go...


* Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11.
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...


* Bio: http://bowman2006.com/about....

George Nelson, "With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon
crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that
a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged."

Col. George Nelson


Col. George Nelson, U.S. Air Force (ret) - Former U.S. Air Force
aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. 34-year
Air Force career.

* Essay: "The government alleges that four wide-body airliners
crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of
more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft
evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of
the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential
evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. ...

With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash
site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a
Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with
all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most
doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the
ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. ...

As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives
and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome
and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be
involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history."
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson....

Douglas Rokke, "When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash
site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building
and the fact the projectile's impact penetrated numerous concrete
walls, it looks like the work of a missile. And when you look at the
damage, it was obviously a missile."

Major Douglas Rokke


Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, U.S. Army (ret) - Former Director U.S. Army
Depleted Uranium Project.

* Article: Regarding the impact at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001 "When
you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane
parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the
projectile's impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like
the work of a missile. And when you look at the damage, it was
obviously a missile." http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf....

Russ Wittenberg

Capt. Russ Wittenberg


Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force - Former Air Force fighter
pilot with over 100 combat missions. Commercial pilot for Pan Am and
United Airlines for 35 years, flying 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767,
and 777 's. Had previously flown the actual two United Airlines
airplanes that were hijacked on 9/11 (Flight 93, which impacted in
Pennsylvania, and Flight 175, the second plane to hit the WTC).

* Article: "The government story they handed us about 9/11 is
total B.S. plain and simple." ... Wittenberg convincingly argued there
was absolutely no possibility that Flight 77 could have "descended
7,000 feet in two minutes, all the while performing a steep 270 degree
banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon's first floor wall
without touching the lawn." ...

"For a guy to just jump into the cockpit and fly like an ace is
impossible - there is not one chance in a thousand," said Wittenberg,
recalling that when he made the jump from Boeing 727's to the highly
sophisticated computerized characteristics of the 737's through 767's
it took him considerable time to feel comfortable flying."
http://www.arcticbeacon.com....


* Audio Interview 9/16/04: Regarding Flight 77, which allegedly hit
the Pentagon. "The airplane could not have flown at those speeds which
they said it did without going into what they call a high speed stall.
The airplane won't go that fast if you start pulling those high G
maneuvers at those bank angles. ... To expect this alleged airplane to
run these maneuvers with a total amateur at the controls is simply
ludicrous...

It's roughly a 100 ton airplane. And an airplane that weighs
100 tons all assembled is still going to have 100 tons of disassembled
trash and parts after it hits a building. There was no wreckage from a
757 at the Pentagon. ... The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was not
Flight 77. We think, as you may have heard before, it was a cruise
missile." http://911underground.com/.../

Lt. Col. Stephen L. Butler
No photo available


Lt. Col. Stephen L. Butler, EdD, U.S. Air Force (ret) - Former Vice
Chancellor for Student Affairs at the Defense Language Institute.
Served as a B-52 Radar Navigator in the Gulf War. 24-year Air Force
career.

* Article 6/4/02: "Of course Bush knew about the impending attacks
on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he
needed this war on terrorism."
http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/06.06E.butler.bush.htm

Anthony Shaffer

Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer


Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, U.S. Army (ret) - Former Chief of the
Army's Controlled HUMINT (Human Intelligence) Program, overseeing
Army Intelligence and Security Command's global controlled HUMINT
efforts. A former member of the ABLE DANGER effort to target Al
Qaeda's global structure. Awarded the Bronze Star for bravery.
23-year military intelligence career.

* Testimony before the House Armed Services Committee 2/15/06 (page
18) - "After contact by two separate members of the ABLE DANGER
team, ... the 9-11 staff refused to perform any in-depth review of
investigation of the issues that were identified to them. ... It was
their job to do a thorough investigation of these claims - to not
simply dismiss them based on what many now believe was a
"preconceived" conclusion to the 9-11 story they wished to tell.
... I consider this a failure of the 9-11 staff - a failure that the
9-11 Commissioners themselves were victimized by - and continue to
have perpetrated on them by the staff as is evidenced by their recent,
groundless conclusion that ABLE DANGER's findings were "urban
legend". http://www.abledan...


* Bio: http://www.c4ads.org/anthony.shaffer...

Karen Kwiatkowski, "Reading through the official 9/11 report, I
quickly lost my focus - apparently emulating the 9/11 commission over
the past 20 months."

Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski


Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) - Former
Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of
Defense. Also served on the staff of the Director of the National
Security Agency. 20-year Air Force veteran.

* Book 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out: "Beyond
this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind
of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of
a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have
been apparent to the secretary of defense, who in an unfortunate slip
of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon
as a "missile".--Karen Kwiatkowski, Pentagon employee and eyewitness
(p.28) http://www.twf.org/News


* Essay: "Reading through the official 9/11 report, I quickly lost
my focus - apparently emulating the 9/11 commission over the past 20
months. ...One wonders if the entire commission wasn't secretly
replaced by pod people from the old Soviet Central Committee. I
naively expected more constructive and useful information in the
report." http://www.lewrockwell.com/...


* Bio: http://militaryweek.com/

John Newman

Major John M. Newman


Major John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army (ret) - Former Executive
Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency. Former
military attaché in China. 21-year career in U.S. Army Intelligence.
Currently, professor of history and international relations at the
University of Maryland.

* Congressional testimony 8/15/05: "It falls to me this morning to
bring to your attention the story of Saeed Sheikh, whose full name is
Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, and his astonishing rise to power in Al Qaeda,
his crucial role in 9/11, which is completely, utterly, missing from
the 9/11 Commission report...


The 9/11 Commission which studied US intelligence and law
enforcement community performance in great detail, (maybe not so much
great detail, but they did), neglected to cover the community's
performance during the weeks following the attacks to determine who was
responsible for them, not a word about that in the Report.


The Report does discuss the immediate US responses but the
immediate investigation is never addressed, and anyone who has closely
studied the post-9/11 investigation knows that the first breakthrough
came two weeks into the investigation when the money transfers from the
United Arab Emirates to the hijackers were uncovered.


Furthermore, if you have studied that investigation, you know
there is no disputing that while investigators may have struggled with
the identity of the paymaster, they were clear about one thing, he was
Al Qaeda's finance chief. For this reason alone you have to ask why
the 9/11 Commission Report never mentions the finance chief's role as
the 9/11 paymaster." http://www.911readingroo

Scott Ritter

Major Scott Ritter


Major Scott Ritter, U.S. Marine Corps - Former Marine Corps
Intelligence Officer and Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations
Special Commission in Iraq 1991-1998.

* Video: "I, like the others, are frustrated by the 9/11 Commission
Report, by the lack of transparency on the part of the United States
government, both in terms of the executive branch and the legislative
branch when it comes to putting out on the table all facts known to the
9/11 case." http://video.go...

Barbara Honegger

Barbara Honegger


Barbara Honegger - Senior Military Affairs Journalist at the Naval
Postgraduate School, the U.S. Navy's advanced science, technology and
national security affairs university (1995 - present). White House
Policy Analyst and Special Assistant to the Assistant to President
Ronald Reagan (1981-83).

* Essay: "The US military, not al Qaeda, had the sustained access
weeks before 9/11 to also plant controlled demolition charges
throughout the superstructures of WTC 1 and WTC2, and in WTC7, which
brought down all three buildings on 9/11. ... A US military plane, not
one piloted by al Qaeda, performed the highly skilled, high-speed
270-degree dive towards the Pentagon that Air Traffic Controllers on
9/11 were sure was a military plane as they watched it on their
screens. Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al
Qaeda, would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the
Pentagon's anti-aircraft missile batteries as it approached the
building. Only the US military, not al Qaeda, had the ability to break
all of its Standard Operating Procedures to paralyze its own emergency
response system." http://blog.lege.....

Gregory Zeigler

Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler


Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, U.S. Army - Former U.S. Army
Intelligence Officer

* Statement: "I knew from September 18, 2001, that the official
story about 9/11 was false. ... [A]nomalies poured in rapidly: the
hijackers' names appearing in none of the published flight passenger
lists, BBC reports of stolen identities of the alleged hijackers or the
alleged hijackers being found alive, the obvious demolitions of WTC1,
2, and 7, the lack of identifiable Boeing 757 wreckage at the Pentagon
... Link to full statement

U.S. INTELLIGENCE SERVICES VETERANS

Raymond McGovern, "The 9/11 report is a joke. The question is: What's
being covered up? Is it gross malfeasance, gross negligence,
misfeasance?"

Raymond L. McGovern


Raymond L. McGovern - Former Chairman, National Intelligence
Estimates, CIA, responsible for preparing the President' Daily Brief
(PDB) for Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. 27-year CIA veteran.
Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer.

* Video: "I think at simplest terms, there's a cover-up. The
9/11 report is a joke. The question is: What's being covered up? Is
it gross malfeasance, gross negligence, misfeasance? ... Now there are
a whole bunch of unanswered questions. And the reason they're
unanswered is because this administration will not answer the
questions. ... I just want to reassert, what Scott [Ritter, former
Major in the U.S. Marines Corps, former Chief Weapons Inspector for the
United Nations Special Commission in Iraq] said and this is the bottom
line for me, just as Hitler in 1933 cynically exploited the burning of
the parliament building, the Reichstag, this is exactly what our
President did in exploiting 9/11. The cynical way in which he played
on our trauma, used it to justify attacking, making a war of aggression
on a country that he knew had nothing to do with 9/11. That suffices
for me, I think Scott is exactly right, that's certainly an
impeachable offense." http://video.google...


* Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11.
http://www.911truth.org/...


* Bio: http://faculty.schreiner.edu/...

William Christison, "I now think there is persuasive evidence that
the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and
the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. ... An airliner almost
certainly did not hit The Pentagon. ... The North and South Towers of
the World Trade Center almost certainly did not collapse and fall to
earth because hijacked aircraft hit them."

William Christison


William Christison - Former National Intelligence Officer and
Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis.
29-year CIA veteran.

* Essay: "I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events
of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11
Commission would have us believe. ... An airliner almost certainly did
not hit The Pentagon. ... The North and South Towers of the World Trade
Center almost certainly did not collapse and fall to earth because
hijacked aircraft hit them." http://www.dissidentvoice.org...


* Article: "David Griffin believes this all was totally an inside
job - I've got to say I think that it was too. ... I have since decided
that....at least some elements in this US government had contributed in
some way or other to causing 9/11 to happen or at least allowing it to
happen. ... The reason that the two towers in New York actually
collapsed and fell all the way to the ground was controlled explosions
rather than just being hit by two airplanes. ... All of the
characteristics of these demolitions show that they almost had to have
been controlled explosions." http://www.prisonplanet.com/...

Robert Steele

Robert David Steele (Vivas)


Robert David Steele (Vivas) - U.S. Marine Corps infantry and
intelligence officer for twenty years. Second-ranking civilian (GS-14)
in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence from 1988-1992 and a member of the
Adjunct Faculty of Marine Corps University. Also former clandestine
services case officer with the CIA. 25-year U.S. military and
intelligence career. Currently Founder and CEO of OSS.net and a
proponent of Open Source Intelligence.

* Essay 10/7/06: Review of Webster Tarpley's 9/11 Synthetic Terror:
Made in the USA. "I am forced to conclude that 9/11 was at a minimum
allowed to happen as a pretext for war, and I am forced to conclude
that there is sufficient evidence to indict (not necessarily convict)
Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and others of a neo-conservative neo-Nazi coup
d'etat and kick-off of the clash of civilizations. ...

This is, without question, the most important modern reference on
state-sponsored terrorism, and also the reference that most pointedly
suggests that select rogue elements within the US Government, most
likely led by Dick Cheney with the assistance of George Tenet, Buzzy
Kronguard, and others close to the Wall Street gangs, are the most
guilty of state-sponsored terrorism....

I sit here, a 54-year old, liberally educated, two graduate
degrees, war college, a life overseas, 150 IQ or so, the number #1
Amazon reviewer for non-fiction, a former Marine Corps infantry
officer, a former CIA clandestine case officer, founder of the Marine
Corps Intelligence Center, and I have to tell anyone who cares to read
this: I believe it. I believe it enough to want a full investigation
that passes the smell test of the 9/11 families as well as objective
outside observers." http://www.amazon.com


* Article: "While Steele stopped short of saying 9/11 was a
complete inside job, he agreed that the evidence points to the
overwhelming complicity of the Bush administration.

"The U.S. government did not properly investigate this and there
are more rocks to be turned over," said Steele adding, "I'm absolutely
certain that WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition and that
as far as I'm concerned means that this case has not been properly
investigated. There's no way that building could have come down
without controlled demolition." http://www.prisonplanet
*

Bio:http://en.wikipedia.org

Melvin Goodman, "I want to talk about the [9/11] Commission itself,
about the flawed process of the Commission and finally about the
conflict of interest within the Commission that is extremely important
to understand the failure of the Commission."

Melvin A. Goodman


Melvin A. Goodman - Former Division Chief and Senior Analyst at the
Office of Soviet Affairs, CIA,1966 - 1990. Senior Analyst at the
Bureau of Intelligence and Research, State Department, 1974-1976.
Professor of International Security at the National War College
1986-2004. Currently Senior Fellow at the Center for International
Policy and Adjunct Professor of International Relations at Johns
Hopkins University. He is the author and co-author of five books on
international relations.

* Congressional testimony 7/22/05: "I want to talk about the [9/11]
Commission itself, about the flawed process of the Commission and
finally about the conflict of interest within the Commission that is
extremely important to understand the failure of the Commission."
http://www.house.gov/...


* Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers to question. ... As Americans of
conscience, we ask for four things:
o An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General
Eliot Spitzer
o Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
o Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
o The formation of a truly independent citizens-based
inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...


* Bio: http://ciponline.org/biographies....

Robert Baer

Robert Baer


Robert Baer - Former CIA Case Officer, Specialist in the Middle East,
Directorate of Operations. Awarded Career Intelligence Medal. 21-year
CIA veteran. Author of two nonfiction books about CIA operations, See
No Evil and Sleeping with the Devil

* Audio Interview 6/9/06: Thom Hartmann: "Are you of the opinion
there was an aspect of 'inside job' to 9/11 within the U.S.
government?"
Baer: "There is that possibility, the evidence points at it."
Hartmann: "And why is it not being investigated?"
Baer: "Why isn't the WMD story being investigated? Why hasn't
anybody been held accountable for 9/11? We held people accountable
after Pearl Harbor. Why has there been no change in command? Why have
there been no political repercussions? Why has there been no, any sort
of exposure on this? It really makes you wonder."
http://www.911blogger.com/...


* Essay: "Did bin Laden act alone, through his own al-Qaida
network, in launching the attacks? About that I'm far more certain and
emphatic: no." http://books.guardian.co....


* Bio: http://www.concertideas.com/...

Sibel Edmonds, "I find your report seriously flawed in its failure to
address serious intelligence issues that I am aware of, which have been
confirmed, and which as a witness to the commission, I made you aware
of."

Sibel D. Edmonds


Sibel D. Edmonds - Former Language Translation Specialist, performing
translations for counterterrorism and counterintelligence operations,
FBI. Witness before the 9/11 Commission.

* Letter to 9/11 Commission: "I find your report seriously flawed
in its failure to address serious intelligence issues that I am aware
of, which have been confirmed, and which as a witness to the
commission, I made you aware of. Thus, I must assume that other serious
issues that I am not aware of were in the same manner omitted from your
report. These omissions cast doubt on the validity of your report and
therefore on its conclusions and recommendations." http://www.com...


* Article: "My translations of the 9/11 intercepts included
[terrorist] money laundering, detailed and date-specific information
... if they were to do real investigations, we would see several
significant high-level criminal prosecutions in this country [the US]
... and believe me, they will do everything to cover this up."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,,1266511,00.html

Bogdan Dzakovic

Bogdan Dzakovic


Bogdan Dzakovic - 14-year Counter-terrorism expert in the Security
Division of the Federal Aviation Administration. Team Leader of the
FAA's Red (Terrorism) Team, which conducted undercover tests on airport
security through simulated terrorist attacks. Former Team Leader in
the Federal Air Marshal program. Former Coast Guard officer. Witness
before the 9/11 Commission.

* Video transcript: Regarding the 9/11 Commission "The best I could
say about it is they really botched the job by not really going into
the real failures. ... At worst, I think the 9/11 Commission Report is
treasonous. And if you look at what the word "treason" means in the
Webster's Dictionary, it's a betrayal of a trust."
http://www.911report.com...

Letter to Congress regarding the 9/11 Commission Report, signed by the
following 25 military, intelligence, and security veterans:

"[W]e the undersigned wish to bring to the attention of the Congress
and the people of the United States what we believe are serious
shortcomings in the [9/11 Commission] report and its recommendations.
...

Omission is one of the major flaws in the Commission's report. We are
aware of significant issues and cases that were duly reported to the
commission by those of us with direct knowledge, but somehow escaped
attention. ...

The omission of such serious and applicable issues and information by
itself renders the report flawed, and casts doubt on the validity of
many of its recommendations." http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/...

Edward J. Costello, Jr. - Former Special Agent, Counterterrorism,
FBI. Former Judge pro tem., Los Angeles, CA.

John M. Cole - Former Intelligence Operations Specialist, in the
FBI's Counterintelligence Division. In charge of FBI's foreign
intelligence investigations covering India, Pakistan and
Afghanistan.18-year FBI career.

David "Mark" Conrad - Retired Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S.
Customs, responsible for the internal integrity and security for areas
encompassing nine states and two foreign locations. Former Federal Sky
Marshall. 27-year U.S. Customs career. Currently Professor of Criminal
Justice at Troy University.

Rosemary N. Dew - Former Supervisory Special Agent, Counterterrorism
and Counterintelligence, FBI. Former member of The President's National
Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC) and the
Electronic Commerce/Cyber Crime Working Group. 13-year FBI career.

Bogdan Dzakovic - 14-year Counter-terrorism expert in the Security
Division of the Federal Aviation Administration. Team Leader of the
FAA's Red (Terrorism) Team, which conducted undercover tests on airport
security through simulated terrorist attacks. Former Team Leader in
the Federal Air Marshal program. Former Coast Guard officer. Witness
before the 9/11 Commission. (See also individual quote above.)

Sibel D. Edmonds - Former Language Translation Specialist, performing
translations for counterterrorism and
counterintelligence operations, FBI. Witness before the 9/11
Commission. (See also individual quote above.)

Steve Elson - Former Special Agent with the U.S. Navy and the FAA.
Specialist in Counterterrorism, Intelligence, and Security. Twenty-two
years military experience, primarily in Naval Special Warfare and nine
years Federal service with the FAA and DEA. Retired Navy Seal.

David Forbes - Former head of Thames Valley Police Fraud Squad,
trained at New Scotland Yard. Over 30 years experience in law
enforcement, commercial and industrial security-related risk
management, and service sector business management. Currently
Aviation, Logistics and Govt. Security Analyst, BoydForbes, Inc.

Melvin A. Goodman - Former Division Chief and Senior Analyst at the
Office of Soviet Affairs, CIA,1966 - 1990. Senior Analyst at the
Bureau of Intelligence and Research, State Department, 1974-1976.
Professor of International Security at the National War College
1986-2004. Currently Senior Fellow at the Center for International
Policy and Adjunct Professor of International Relations at Johns
Hopkins University. He is the author and co-author of five books on
international relations. (See also individual quote above.)

Mark Graf - Former Security Supervisor, Planner, and Derivative
Classifier, Department of Energy. Former Chairman of the Rocky Flats
(DOE) Physical Security Systems Working Group from 1990 through 1995.

Gilbert M. Graham - Retired Special Agent, Counterintelligence, FBI.
24-year FBI career.

Diane Kleiman - Former Special Agent, US Customs.

Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) - Former
Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of
Defense. Also served on the staff of the Director of the National
Security Agency. 20-year Air Force veteran. (See also individual quote
above.)

Lynne A. Larkin - Former CIA Operations Officer. Served in several
CIA foreign stations and in the CIA's counter-intelligence center
helping chair a multi-agency task force and seminars on coordinating
intelligence among intelligence and crime prevention agencies.

David MacMichael - Former Senior Estimates Officer with special
responsibility for Western Hemisphere Affairs at the CIA's National
Intelligence Council. Former Captain, U.S. Marine Corps 10-year
military service.

Raymond L. McGovern - Former Chairman, National Intelligence
Estimates, CIA, responsible for preparing the President' Daily Brief
(PDB) for Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. 27-year CIA veteran.
Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer. (See also individual quote
above.)

Theodore J. Pahle - Former Senior Intelligence Officer with the
Defense Intelligence Agency. His 37-year intelligence career was
exclusively as a HUMINT operations officer with DIA, Office of Naval
Intelligence and U.S. Army Intelligence. He is a Middle East and Latin
American operations specialist. Today, he continues to support the
HUMINT effort as a contract instructor.

Behrooz Sarshar - Retired Language Translation Specialist, performing
Farsi translations for counterterrorism
and counterintelligence operations dealing with Iran and Afghanistan,
FBI.

Brian F. Sullivan - Retired Special Agent and Risk Management
Specialist, FAA. Retired Lieutenant Colonel, Military Police.

Commander Larry J. Tortorich, U.S. Navy (ret) - Former Deputy Program
Manager for Logistics - Tomahawk Cruise Missiles. 24-year Navy career
in the fields of aviation and counterterrorism. Two years as a federal
employee with DHS/TSA in the fields of security and counterterrorism.

Jane A. Turner - Retired Special Agent, FBI. 24-year FBI career.

John B. Vincent - Retired Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBI.
27-year FBI career.

Dr. Fred Whitehurst - Retired Supervisory Special Agent / Laboratory
Forensic Examiner, FBI. Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer.

Col. Ann Wright, U.S. Army (ret) - Retired Army officer and former
U.S. Diplomat. Served 13 years on active duty with the U.S. Army and 16
years in the U.S. Army Reserves. She was a member of the International
law team in Operation Urgent Fury in Grenada and served in Panama and
Somalia. She joined the Foreign Service in 1987 and served as Deputy
Chief of Mission of U.S. Embassies in Sierra Leone, Micronesia and
Afghanistan. She helped reopen the US Embassy in Kabul in December,
2001.

Matthew J. Zipoli - Special Response Team (SRT) Officer, DOE. Vice
President, Security Police Officer's Association, Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory
INTERNATIONAL MILITARY, INTELLIGENCE AND
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

Paul Hellyer, "I think the inquiry has been very shallow, very
superficial. I would like to see a much tougher, more in-depth
inquiry."

Paul Hellyer


Paul Hellyer - Former Minister of National Defense of Canada. Former
Deputy Prime Minister. Former Member of House of Commons.

* Video: Regarding 9/11 "I think the inquiry has been very
shallow, very superficial. I would like to see a much tougher, more
in-depth inquiry. ... I would like to see someone in a position of
authority ask those questions and insist on getting answers, at least
to why some of the things that happened that seem to be, for an
ordinary person, inexplicable. ... We have to try and get the truth.
... I hope that somebody has the courage and persistence to keep at it
until we get it." http://www.septembereleventh.org/...


* Bio: http://www.nationmaster.com/...

Michael Meacher

Michael Meacher


Michael Meacher - Former Under Secretary for Industry, Under
Secretary for Health and Social Security, Minister for the Environment,
and Member of the House of Commons (UK).

* Video: Regarding the 9/11 Commission Report "It was a 580-page
avoidance of any serious explanation. ... The official investigative
report says the US has never been able to find the sources of financing
for 9/11. And then they say this "That after all is a matter of no
great importance." I find that astonishing. It is a matter of
absolutely central importance. So there was a very great deal of
evidence. And it seems to me extraordinary that the United States with
its stupendous military capabilities and the most technologically
advanced country in the world completely and totally failed to follow
up on these leads." http://video.google...


* Essay 7/22/04: "[Omar] Sheikh is also the man who, on the
instructions of General Mahmoud Ahmed, the then head of Pakistan's
Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), wired $100,000 before the 9/11
attacks to Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker. It is extraordinary that
neither Ahmed nor Sheikh have been charged and brought to trial on this
count. Why not? ...


When Ahmed was exposed by the Wall Street Journal as having sent
the money to the hijackers, he was forced to "retire" by President
Pervez Musharraf. Why hasn't the US demanded that he be questioned and
tried in court?" http://www.guardian.co


* Editor's note:Despite the Joint House-Senate Committee's earlier
finding that at least one foreign government supported the 9/11
terrorist suspects, the 9/11 Commission Report states, "Similarly, we
have seen no evidence that any foreign government -- or government
official -- supplied any funding." (p. 172)


* Bio: http://www.epolitix.com/...

Andreas von Buelow, "The official story is so inadequate and
far-fetched that there must be another one."

Andreas von Buelow


Andreas von Buelow, PhD - Former State Secretary of the Federal
Ministry of Defense of West Germany. Former Minister of Research and
Technology. Member of Bundestag (Parliament) 1969-1994.

* Video: "The official story is so inadequate and far-fetched that
there must be another one." http://video.google.com/...


* Article/Interview: "The planning of the attacks was technically
and organizationally a master achievement. To hijack four huge
airplanes within a few minutes and within one hour, to drive them into
their targets, with complicated flight maneuvers! This is unthinkable,
without years-long support from secret apparatuses of the state and
industry." http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow....

Horst Ehmke

Horst Ehmke


Horst Ehmke, - Former Minister of Justice (West Germany). Former
Minister for Research and Technology. Cabinet Member under Chancellors
Kurt Kiesinger and Willy Brandt 1966-1974.

* Article: "Terrorists could not have carried out such an operation
with four hijacked planes without the support of a secret service."
http://www.guardian.co


* Bio: http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?hl=en&sl=d

Leonid Ivashov, "Only secret services and their current chiefs - or
those retired but still having influence inside the state organizations
- have the ability to plan, organize and conduct an operation of such
magnitude."

General Leonid Ivashov


General Leonid Ivashov - Former Chief of Staff of the Russian armed
forces on 9/11/2001, and Department Chief for General affairs in the
Soviet Union's Ministry of Defense.

* Essay: Regarding 9/11 "Only secret services and their current
chiefs - or those retired but still having influence inside the state
organizations - have the ability to plan, organize and conduct an
operation of such magnitude." http://www.physics911.net/ivashov....

Paul Lannoye

Paul Lannoye


Paul Lannoye - Member of European Parliament 1989-2004, (Belgium).
Former Vice Chairman, Committee on Energy, Research and Technology.
Former Vice Chairman, Committee on the Environment, Public Health and
Consumer Protection

* Open Letter 5/24/04: "I implore legislators, parliamentarians,
and citizens worldwide to become involved in the global 9-11 Truth
Movement by signing up at www.911Visibility.org and www.911Truth.org.
These organizations have worked with 9-11 family members, and citizens
worldwide to lobby government, media, and the 9-11 Commission to demand
truth, and to hold public actions to educate the world about the
apparent 9-11 cover up." http://www.911truth.org...

Mohamed Hassanein Heikal, Bin Laden does not have the capabilities for
an operation of this magnitude. When I hear Bush talking about al-Qaida
as if it was Nazi Germany or the communist party of the Soviet Union, I
laugh because I know what is there."

Mohamed Hassanein Heikal


Mohamed Hassanein Heikal - Former Foreign Minister of Egypt.

* Article: Regarding 9/11 "Bin Laden does not have the capabilities
for an operation of this magnitude. When I hear Bush talking about
al-Qaida as if it was Nazi Germany or the communist party of the Soviet
Union, I laugh because I know what is there. Bin Laden has been under
surveillance for years: every telephone call was monitored and al-Qaida
has been penetrated by American intelligence, Pakistani intelligence,
Saudi intelligence, Egyptian intelligence. They could not have kept
secret an operation that required such a degree of organisation and
sophistication." http://www.guardian.co.uk/...

David Shayler, "The available evidence indicates that people in key
positions in the FBI, the State Department, the CIA and so on were not
loyal to the Constitution; that they saw an opportunity in plans laid
down by genuine Islamic terrorists to carry out an operation that would
shock the world and would therefore justify U.S. adventurism in the
middle East, particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq."

David Shayler


David Shayler - Former Counter-Terrorism Officer, MI5 (Britain)

* Video: "The available evidence indicates that people in key
positions in the FBI, the State Department, the CIA and so on were not
loyal to the Constitution; that they saw an opportunity in plans laid
down by genuine Islamic terrorists to carry out an operation that would
shock the world and would therefore justify U.S. adventurism in the
middle East, particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq."
http://video.google.com

9/11 COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF MEMBERS WHO CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE
COMMISSION REPORT
Thomas Kean

Thomas H. Kean


Thomas H. Kean, Chairman, 9/11 Commission - Former Governor of New
Jersey 1982 - 1990. Also served for 10 years in the New Jersey
Assembly. Currently President of Drew University.

* Without Precedent, a book about the 9/11 Commission authored by
Chairman Thomas Kean and Vice-Chairman Lee Hamilton 8/4/06: "Fog of war
could explain why some people were confused on the day of 9/11, but it
could not explain why all of the after-action reports, accident
investigations and public testimony by FAA and NORAD officials advanced
an account of 9/11 that was untrue." http://www.washingtonpost.com


* Washington Post Article 8/2/06 - "Some staff members and
commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's
initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have
been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the
public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day,
according to sources involved in the debate. ...


"We, to this day, don't know why NORAD [the North American
Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the
former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. "It was
just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that
never got tied." http://www.washington


* Editor's note: Despite the many public statements by 9/11
Commissioners and staff members acknowledging they were repeatedly lied
to, not a single person has ever been charged, tried, or even
reprimanded for lying to the 9/11 Commission.


* Bio: http://www.9-11commission.gov/about/bio_kean.htm

Lee Hamilton

Lee Hamilton


Lee Hamilton, Vice Chairman, 9/11 Commission - Former 17-term
Congressman from Indiana. Former Chairman of the House Committee on
Foreign Affairs and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
Currently President and Director of the Woodrow Wilson International
Center for Scholars and serves as a member of the President's Homeland
Security Advisory Council.

* Video interview: Lee Hamilton "So there are all kinds of reasons
we thought we were set up to fail. We got started late. We had a very
short timeframe. Indeed, we had to get it extended. We did not have
enough money. They were afraid we were going to hang somebody, that we
would point the finger."


Interviewer: "Is one of the reasons why these guys aren't getting
funded and it's so late is that someone's got something to hide?"


Hamilton: "Well, a lot of people have things to hide. ...


I don't believe for a minute that we got everything right. We
wrote a first draft of history. People will be investigating 9/11 for
the next 100 years in this country and they're going to find out some
things that we missed." http://youtube.com


* Bio: http://www.9-11commission.gov

Timothy Roemer

Timothy J. Roemer


Timothy J. Roemer, PhD, 9/11 Commissioner - Former 6-term Congressman
from Indiana (1991-2003). Former member of the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence. Currently President of the Center for
National Policy.

* New York Times Article 10/2/06: Regarding recent revelations of a
July 10, 2001 meeting between Condoleezza Rice, George Tenet, and Cofer
Black "In interviews Saturday and Sunday, commission members said they
were never told about the meeting despite hours of public and private
questioning with Rice, Tenet and Black, much of it focused specifically
on how the White House had dealt with terrorist threats in the summer
of 2001.


"None of this was shared with us in hours of private interviews,
including interviews under oath; nor do we have any paper on this,"
said Timothy Roemer, a Democratic member of the commission and a former
congressman from Indiana. "I'm deeply disturbed by this. I'm furious."
http://www.statesman


* Editor's note: Despite the many public statements by 9/11
Commissioners and staff members acknowledging they were repeatedly lied
to, not a single person has ever been charged, tried, or even
reprimanded for lying to the 9/11 Commission.


* Bio: http://www.9-11commission.gov/about/bio_roemer

John Farmer

John J. Farmer, Jr.


John J. Farmer, Jr., Senior Counsel, 9/11 Commission - Former Attorney
General of the State of New Jersey. Former Chief Counsel to former New
Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman. Former Commissioner of the
State Commission of Investigations. Former Assistant U.S. Attorney for
the District of New Jersey.

* Washington Post Article 8/2/06 - "Some staff members and
commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's
initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have
been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the
public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day,
according to sources involved in the debate. ...

"I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was
described," John Farmer, a former New Jersey attorney general who led
the staff inquiry into events on Sept. 11, said in a recent interview.
"The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to
us and the public for two years. ... This is not spin. This is not
true." http://www.washingtonpost


* Editor's note: Despite the many public statements by 9/11
Commissioners and staff members acknowledging they were repeatedly lied
to, not a single person has ever been charged, tried, or even
reprimanded for lying to the 9/11 Commission.


* Bio: http://www.klng.com/professionals/detail


Peter Rundlet

Peter Rundlet


Peter Rundlet, Counsel for the 9/11 Commission - Former Associate
Counsel to President Clinton. Former White House Fellow, serving in
the Office of the Chief of Staff to President Clinton. Currently Vice
President for National Security and International Affairs, Center for
American Progress.

* Essay 9/30/06: "A mixture of shock, anger, and sadness overcame
me when I read about revelations in Bob Woodward's new book about a
special surprise visit that George Tenet and his counterterrorism chief
Cofer Black made to Condi Rice, also on July 10, 2001 ...


If true, it is shocking that the administration failed to heed
such an overwhelming alert from the two officials in the best position
to know. Many, many questions need to be asked and answered about this
revelation - questions that the 9/11 Commission would have asked, had
the Commission been told about this significant meeting. Suspiciously,
the Commissioners and the staff investigating the administration's
actions prior to 9/11 were never informed of the meeting.


The Commission interviewed Condoleezza Rice privately and during
public testimony; it interviewed George Tenet three times privately and
during public testimony; and Cofer Black was also interviewed privately
and publicly. All of them were obligated to tell the truth. Apparently,
none of them described this meeting, the purpose of which clearly was
central to the Commission's investigation. Moreover, document
requests to both the White House and to the CIA should have revealed
the fact that this meeting took place. Now, more than two years after
the release of the Commission's report, we learn of this meeting from
Bob Woodward.


Was it covered up? It is hard to come to a different conclusion.
... At a minimum, the withholding of information about this meeting is
an outrage. Very possibly, someone committed a crime. And worst of all,
they failed to stop the plot." http://think


* Editor's note: Despite the many public statements by 9/11
Commissioners and staff members acknowledging they were repeatedly lied
to, not a single person has ever been charged, tried, or even
reprimanded for lying to the 9/11 Commission.


* Bio: http://www.americanprogress.orgl

Vernon

unread,
Nov 3, 2006, 2:05:04 PM11/3/06
to

"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162566524.8...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...


I see your conspiracy fixation, hate fixation is another symptom of brain
damage associated with the inability to read and follow any logic..

Sorry about that.


BrentB

unread,
Nov 3, 2006, 3:20:26 PM11/3/06
to

I'm not the one calling these patriots evil nazis...you are.

David Wright

unread,
Nov 5, 2006, 4:41:41 PM11/5/06
to
In article <lummk21ommkchf1qq...@4ax.com>,

Peter Bowditch <myfir...@ratbags.com> wrote:
>"BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Mark Probert wrote:
>>> BrentB wrote:
>>> > Mark Probert wrote:
>>> > (snip tired BS)
>>> >> Just admit that Lyme caused your brain damage to allow you to believe
>>> >> these bullshit conspiracies. I'll be on your side.
>>> >
>>> > So are you stating all these people have brain damage due to Lyme?
>>>
>>> Where did you find that? There are many causes of brain damage.
>>>
>>> Are
>>> > they all morons?
>>>
>>
>>Just answer the question. You state that anyone who is a critic of the
>>9-11 government line is brain damaged and/or a moron. I will repeat the
>>question are all the 50 reputable people (imo) brain damaged and/or
>>morons. a simple yes or no will do.
>
>One of them, Ronald Reagan, probably could have been described as
>"brain damaged", as he was in an advanced stage of Alzheimer's when he
>was supposed to be giving a considered opinion on the matter. I don't
>know whether Richard Nixon was either, what with him being dead at the
>time.

I don't want to seem to be defending this "9/11 Truth" craziness, but
you guys are misreading the list. Nixon and Reagan are not on it;
their names appear as continuations from the previous line, where the
actual name on the list is said to have been associated with Nixon or
Reagan.

If you're deliberately misreading it to be funny, never mind.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"George Bush is a gruesome boob." -- Bill Maher

The One True Zhen Jue

unread,
Nov 5, 2006, 5:40:50 PM11/5/06
to

BrentB wrote:
> Vernon wrote:
> > "BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1162402149.7...@e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

> > >
> > > Vernon wrote:
> > >> "BrentB" <borger...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > >> news:1162394217.1...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> > >> >
> > >> > Vernon wrote:
> > >> >> "RosieBush" <BigR...@Rosiesbush.net> wrote in message
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> It is unconscionable to construct a building that tall with only
> > >> >> horizontal
> > >> >> and vertical beams.
> > >> >
> > >> > What other type beams are there?
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> What a clod.
> > >> Even a highschool student knows what other type beams there are other
> > >> than
> > >> vertical and horizontal.
> > >> Get an education and find out how real buildings are built and how even a
> > >> three story building is often built in the Southwest and always in S.
> > >> Cal.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> w w
> > >> w w
> > >> w w
> > >> w
> > >>
> > >> The above is not horizontal or vertical. Those cants ( note not Jewish
> > >> Cantor) are what is used in real construction.
> > >>
> > >> Oh just for you, here is a definition of cant.
> > >> 1. a salient angle.
> > >> 2. a sudden movement that tilts or overturns a thing.
> > >> 3. a slanting or tilted position.
> > >> 4. an oblique line or surface, as one formed by cutting off the
> > >> corner
> > >> of a square of cube.
> > >> 5. an oblique or slanting face of anything.
> > >> 6. Civil Engineering. (def. 6).
> > >> 7. a sudden pitch or toss.
> > >> 8. Also called flitch. a partly trimmed log.
> > >> -adjective 9. oblique or slanting.
> > >> -verb (used with object) 10. to bevel; form an oblique surface upon.
> > >> 11. to put in an oblique position; tilt; tip.
> > >> 12. to throw with a sudden jerk.
> > >> -verb (used without object) 13. to take or have an inclined position;
> > >> tilt;
> > >> turn.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> NOT HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL
> > >>
> > >> You can copy print all you want and you cannot overcome the thousands of
> > >> EXPERT architects and demolition experts that have a good laugh at your
> > >> quoted idiocy.
> > >
> > > I'm not an expert nor never claimed to be. I Iet the BYU physics
> > > professors among many others do the science. PLEASE for the hundreth
> > > time back up your claims on the thousands of EXPERTS. If you can't then
> > > your a proven LIAR. I'll await your answer.
> > >
> >
> > Let's see.
> >
> > 1. There are thousands of architectural engineers. (of course you wouldn't
> > know that) (Do a web search)
> > 2. There are about a thousand demolition companies, filled with experts.
> > (of course you wouldn't know that either) (Do a web search)
> > 3. Both of the above work, not theorize, in the field. (Now that premise is
> > way above your head or an EX BYU PHYSICS teacher)
> > 4. It's hard to imagine any who missed seeing the films. (Another premise
> > also above your head)
> > 5. None of these have come forward to even suggest any collusion. (Why
> > would they go out of their way to say what happened was AS presented?)
> >
> > Bush is not God.
> > Bush is not omnipotent
> > The CIA / FBI at the time was no where near being controlled or formulated
> > by any existing government. (officially they were, but they had become
> > nearly independent of administration)
> > There have been plenty of retirees, new job people from the agencies, many
> > disgruntled and ONE makes a dumb claim.
> >
> > Oh, I forgot, you people think the Jews are actually in control and have
> > eliminated all dissidents.
>
> I never claimed anything about Jews in control. Kindly stick that BS
> back up your ass. I'm not searching anything. You made the claim and
> apparently you cannot back it up. I'm not surprised. As far as the BYU
> proffesor he resigned to continue his work. Thats all the time I plan
> on wasting on you. btw Vernon tell your bosses they aint getting away
> with it...the list of patriots will grow.

>
> 50 Senior Military, Intelligence, & Govt. Critics of 9/11 Commission

Brent, which of those 50 critics say that it was an inside job? Its
obvious that you don't know that answer or you would NOT have posted
it. Their criticisms do NOT dispute the FACT that Bin Laden and
Al-Qaeda did it.

Your inability to read and understand is at the very heart of your
problem. You're paranoid, gullible, and angry about your lot in life.
You feel that you're being held down by a viscious conspiracy,
otherwise, YOU would be a prominent individual with a sense of
fulfillment.

Here's irrefutable proof. Your choices are to accept the facts and
admit that you were mistaken or claim that the media is owned,
operated, and censored by the conspiracy.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

Grow up, Brent.

>
> Berg, Philip J. - Deputy Attorney General, Pennsylvania

> Bowman, Col. Robert - Director of Advanced Space Programs Development


> under Presidents Ford and Carter

> Burks, Fred - State Department Interpreter for Presidents George W.
> Bush and Bill Clinton


> Christison, William - Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and
> Political Analysis
> Cleland, Senator Max - Member of the 9/11 Commission. Former U.S.
> Senator from Georgia
> Cole, John M - Intelligence Operations Specialist, FBI
> Conrad, David Mark - Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs
> Costello, Edward J. - Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBI
> Dew, Rosemary N. - Supervisory Special Agent, Counterterrorism &
> Counterintelligence, FBI
> Dzakovic, Bogdan - Counterterrorism expert, FAA
> Edmonds, Sibel - Language Translation Specialist, FBI
> Elson, Steve - Special Agent, FAA

> Fitts, Catherine Austin - Assistant Secretary of Housing under George
> H.W. Bush

> Reynolds, Morgan - Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Labor under
> George W. Bush

BrentB

unread,
Nov 5, 2006, 6:25:27 PM11/5/06
to

The One True Zhen Jue wrote:
> BrentB wrote:
> > Vernon wrote:

>
> Brent, which of those 50 critics say that it was an inside job? Its
> obvious that you don't know that answer or you would NOT have posted
> it. Their criticisms do NOT dispute the FACT that Bin Laden and
> Al-Qaeda did it.
>
> Your inability to read and understand is at the very heart of your
> problem. You're paranoid, gullible, and angry about your lot in life.
> You feel that you're being held down by a viscious conspiracy,
> otherwise, YOU would be a prominent individual with a sense of
> fulfillment.
>
> Here's irrefutable proof. Your choices are to accept the facts and
> admit that you were mistaken or claim that the media is owned,
> operated, and censored by the conspiracy.
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
>
> Grow up, Brent.
>

ROFLMAO! Well there you have it. Popular mechanics did an article on it
so that settles it. Sorry son but it's going to take more than that.
btw already read it. Lets go down the list.

FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

Congressman Curt Weldon, "What's the Sept. 11 commission got to hide?"

Rep. Curt Weldon

Rep. Curt Weldon - Vice Chairman of the House Homeland Security
Committee, Vice Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.
Ten-term Republican Congressman from Pennsylvania.

* Fox News Article 8/28/05: Regarding the 9/11 Commission "There's
something very sinister going on here that really troubles me," Weldon
told FOX News on Thursday, blasting the Sept. 11 commission for not
taking the claims more seriously. He said some panel members were
trying to smear Shaffer and Able Danger. "What's the Sept. 11
commission got to hide?" Weldon asked." http://www.foxnews.com/...

* Press conference transcript 9/17/05: Regarding the 9/11
Commission Report "There's something wrong here, something tragically
wrong. The American people, the families, the country and the Congress
need to know the truth, the whole truth, the complete truth. And so far
we haven't gotten it. ... Somebody's got to connect the dots and answer
the questions. If the 9/11 Commission won't do it, then Congress has to
do it." http://www.globalresearch.ca/...

Now who carries more weight? The popular mechanics editors or Rep.Curt
Weldon (who clearly has a serious problem with the 9-11 commission.)
Do you believe like others that this representative is some moron or
crazed nazi out to take over the world?

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 5, 2006, 6:26:30 PM11/5/06
to
The One True Zhen Jue wrote:

Exactly. They may have criticized it, but the criticisms may have been
prior to full government cooperation, etc. However, none of the list,
except the late Richard Nixon, or the Alzheimer's patient, Ronald
Reagan, ever claimed it was not bin Laden and Al-Qaeda.

>
> Your inability to read and understand is at the very heart of your
> problem. You're paranoid, gullible, and angry about your lot in life.
> You feel that you're being held down by a viscious conspiracy,
> otherwise, YOU would be a prominent individual with a sense of
> fulfillment.
>
> Here's irrefutable proof. Your choices are to accept the facts and
> admit that you were mistaken or claim that the media is owned,
> operated, and censored by the conspiracy.
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

I was holding off on that until Brent had his foot in his mouth up to
his knee.

The conspiracy wackos used to harp on the melting point of steel is
higher than the fire could have been argument. They became silent on
that when it was shown that the steel beams substantially weakened at
temperatures LOWER than that. They moved on the implosion conspiracy.

Sadly, every event will have the loons.

BrentB

unread,
Nov 5, 2006, 6:45:23 PM11/5/06
to

So for the record these patriots who question the 9-11 commission are
loons? (4th time asked with no answer)

BrentB

unread,
Nov 5, 2006, 8:08:09 PM11/5/06
to

just fyi for anyone reading

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9MHojRsTRA

great video...who to believe?

Also google "9/11 conspiracy" videos. see which are on top. could
google be any more obvious.

Finally think Bush knows we know. I think so.

In a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into law a provision
which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually
encourage the President to declare federal martial law (1). It does so
by revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits the
President's ability to deploy troops within the United States. The
Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the
Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict
prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With
one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo those
prohibitions.

Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of
2007" (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on
October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the
President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere
in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without
the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress
public disorder."

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=MOR20061029&articleId=3618

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 6, 2006, 9:45:53 AM11/6/06
to

No, idiot, they are not loons for questioning the 9/11 Commission in the
manner that they did. Sad that you cannot read for comprehension.

However, they did not buy into the conspiracy crap that you have.

And, do explain the rationale of including Ronald Reagan and Richard
Nixon in the list? Can you? Do you not think (best word available,
although not descriptive) that this raises issues about the list maker?

BrentB

unread,
Nov 6, 2006, 12:59:15 PM11/6/06
to

I'll agree to cut out the conspiracy talk if and when we have open
congressional hearings on this...Just as the representative urged we
do.

>
> However, they did not buy into the conspiracy crap that you have.

Perhaps...but they want answers.

>
> And, do explain the rationale of including Ronald Reagan and Richard
> Nixon in the list? Can you? Do you not think (best word available,
> although not descriptive) that this raises issues about the list maker?

Talk about sad...I'll copy/paste a recent post by David.

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 7, 2006, 9:24:05 AM11/7/06
to

Please cite the last open Congressional hearing that got to the bottom
of a "conspiracy."

>> However, they did not buy into the conspiracy crap that you have.
>
> Perhaps...but they want answers.

Perhaps? Back to school for you. More reading comprehension classes.

BrentB

unread,
Nov 7, 2006, 10:46:39 AM11/7/06
to

So your stating this representative doesn't know what he's talking
about? So...he's not a loon but a moron?

>
> >> However, they did not buy into the conspiracy crap that you have.
> >
> > Perhaps...but they want answers.
>
> Perhaps? Back to school for you. More reading comprehension classes.
>

So you know what's in their head? Do tell how you know what they think.
I've read nothing stating one way or another as to their overall ideas
as to what happened. They are merely stating that the 9-11 commission
is false...not true...a lie.

Message has been deleted

Mark Probert

unread,
Nov 8, 2006, 7:02:27 PM11/8/06
to

Brent, your problem is that you do not know how to read for
comprehension. YOU raised the idea of having open congressional
hearings, and I asked you when was the last time that an open
congressional hearing got to the bottom of a "conspiracy". You neglected
to answer that.

Let me clarify further, by "getting to the bottom of a "conspiracy"", I
meant that all the facts were revealed to the point where no one
questioned the findings.

Now, do try to answer that inquiry.

> So...he's not a loon but a moron?

There are members of Congress who are loons, morons, and both.

>>>> However, they did not buy into the conspiracy crap that you have.
>>> Perhaps...but they want answers.
>> Perhaps? Back to school for you. More reading comprehension classes.
>>
>
> So you know what's in their head? Do tell how you know what they think.

If they thought it, they would have said it. Since they did not say it,
I do not put words in their mouths. I leave that to conspiracy wackos.

> I've read nothing stating one way or another as to their overall ideas
> as to what happened. They are merely stating that the 9-11 commission
> is false...not true...a lie.

Do read the comments again. They are not totally dismissing the 9/11
Commission findings as you feebly try to portray.

Also note that the reports of the commission were issued in July and
August 2004. IIRC some of you quotes pre-dated that. What are they
saying NOW?


BrentB

unread,
Nov 8, 2006, 8:04:50 PM11/8/06
to
<snip>

> >
> > So your stating this representative doesn't know what he's talking
> > about?
>
> Brent, your problem is that you do not know how to read for
> comprehension.

At least I knew Nixon and Reagan were not on the list. lol

>YOU raised the idea of having open congressional
> hearings,

Correction...it was raised by the esteemed representative. I merely
agree with him. I suppose you do not.

Somebody's got to connect the dots and answer
the questions. If the 9/11 Commission won't do it, then Congress has to
do it." http://www.globalresearch.ca/...

>and I asked you when was the last time that an open


> congressional hearing got to the bottom of a "conspiracy". You neglected
> to answer that.

Got any better answers?

>
> Let me clarify further, by "getting to the bottom of a "conspiracy"", I
> meant that all the facts were revealed to the point where no one
> questioned the findings.

WTF! they did not even answer how WTC7 fell. this is absurd. I feel
this thread is ending.

>
> Now, do try to answer that inquiry.
>
> > So...he's not a loon but a moron?
>
> There are members of Congress who are loons, morons, and both.

You forgot corporate shills who have sold out our country.

>
> >>>> However, they did not buy into the conspiracy crap that you have.
> >>> Perhaps...but they want answers.
> >> Perhaps? Back to school for you. More reading comprehension classes.
> >>
> >
> > So you know what's in their head? Do tell how you know what they think.
>
> If they thought it, they would have said it. Since they did not say it,
> I do not put words in their mouths. I leave that to conspiracy wackos.

Two retired generals who did over 30 years of damage analysis stated
that in no way an airliner crashed into the pentagon. Do you believe
them?

>
> > I've read nothing stating one way or another as to their overall ideas
> > as to what happened. They are merely stating that the 9-11 commission
> > is false...not true...a lie.
>
> Do read the comments again. They are not totally dismissing the 9/11
> Commission findings as you feebly try to portray.

One was a two star general. do you believe him?

>
> Also note that the reports of the commission were issued in July and
> August 2004. IIRC some of you quotes pre-dated that. What are they
> saying NOW?

Lets get some congressman to ask them.

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages