One in four children are 'addicted to their smartphones': Teenagers and young people become anxious and depressed when they're separated from their devices, new study reveals

  • One in four children are exhibiting 'problematic smartphone usage' 
  • Between 10 per cent and 30 per cent use their phones in a dysfunctional way
  • This is defined as behaviour that has an element of addiction - such as anxiety 

One in four children and young people have a problematic relationship with smartphones, research suggests.

These youngsters are exhibiting 'problematic smartphone usage', meaning they use the devices in a way that is consistent with a behavioural addiction, scientists found.

The study, by researchers at King's College London and published in BMC Psychiatry, analysed 41 studies published since 2011 on smartphone usage and mental health.

It concludes that between 10 per cent and 30 per cent of children and young people use their phones in a dysfunctional way, meaning that on average 23 per cent were showing 'problematic smartphone usage' (PSU).

One in four children and young people have a problematic relationship with smartphones, research suggests 

The KCL researchers defined PSU as behaviour linked to smartphone use that has an element of addiction - such as anxiety when the phone is unavailable or causing neglect of other activities.

The study also concludes that there are links between PSU and mental health issues such as anxiety, stress, poor sleep and depressed moods.

Co-senior author Dr Nicola Kalk from the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), said: 'Smartphones are here to stay and there is a need to understand the prevalence of problematic smartphone usage.

'We don't know whether it is the smartphone itself that can be addictive or the apps that people use.

'Nevertheless, there is a need for public awareness around smartphone use in children and young people, and parents should be aware of how much time their children spend on their phones.'

The KCL researchers defined problematic smartphone usage as behaviour linked to smartphone use that has an element of addiction - such as anxiety or causing neglect of other activities

The KCL researchers defined problematic smartphone usage as behaviour linked to smartphone use that has an element of addiction - such as anxiety or causing neglect of other activities

It is the first study to investigate the prevalence of PSU in children and young people at this scale, summarising findings from 41 studies that have researched a total of 41,871 teenagers and young people.

The 41 studies included 30 from Asia, nine from Europe and two America. 55 per cent of the participants were female, and young women in the 17 to 19-year-old age group were most likely to have PSU. 

The study authors note that 22 of the studies examined were of 'poor methodological quality' and that there was wide variation across the research analysed in the definitions of PSU. 

Dr Sam Chamberlain, Wellcome Trust Clinical Fellow, Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist, University of Cambridge, said: 'Research into PSU is important from a public health point of view. The authors report that approximately 10-30 per cent of young people in the studies included in their meta-analysis met a chosen threshold for having PSU.

The study also concludes that there are links between PSU and mental health issues such as anxiety, stress, poor sleep and depressed moods - in both teens and young people

The study also concludes that there are links between PSU and mental health issues such as anxiety, stress, poor sleep and depressed moods - in both teens and young people

'Also, PSU was associated with (by self-report measures) higher levels of depression, anxiety, and worse sleep. These results resonate with previous findings, including those on related topics such as Problematic Usage of the Internet.'

He added: 'One challenge for the field, in light of this valuable meta-analysis, is that Problematic Smartphone Use is not consistently defined.

'There are various rating scales, with different cut-offs and criteria, some of which have not been subjected to sufficient clinical (and other) validation.

'As noted by the authors, research into an accepted and validated set of criteria is urgently needed.'

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.