Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Death by Spanking

0 views
Skip to first unread message

0:->

unread,
Apr 16, 2006, 2:58:16 PM4/16/06
to
The Department of Health and Human Services and the New England Journal
of Medicine estimate that 1,000 to 2,000 children die every year in the
U.S. from corporal punishment that has escalated to a lethal level. They
estimate that 142,000 are seriously injured annually. 1

http://www.religioustolerance.org/spanking.htm

That's the problem I've pointed out here for a couple of years. Parents
often do NOT know where the boundaries are, and cross them all to easily.

Even a child jumping away or startling or making a normal human
protective move can be badly injured or killed.

Why risk it?


--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin

Carlson LaVonne

unread,
Apr 16, 2006, 7:17:12 PM4/16/06
to
Don't you know that these deaths do not result spanking, the practice of
hitting and hurting children in the name of discipline? These are
deaths that result from abuse, the practice of hitting and hurting
children in the name of discipline. Don't you see the difference?

There are no boundaries in hitting and hurting children in the name of
discipline, but there are boundaries for the same behavior when the
victim is over the age of 18.

It's called battery and assault in every state in the US.

LaVonne

Opinions

unread,
Apr 17, 2006, 11:29:33 AM4/17/06
to
How many deaths resulted from spanking as defined by normal people?
How does this number of deaths compare with deaths caused by
automobiles, swimming pools, and medical mistakes?

0:->

unread,
Apr 17, 2006, 12:07:17 PM4/17/06
to
Opinions wrote:
> How many deaths resulted from spanking as defined by normal people?

Define a normal person.

The majority of people escalating to the death of the child started out
spanking as defined by LAW as legal.

> How does this number of deaths compare with deaths caused by
> automobiles, swimming pools, and medical mistakes?

If you lump them all together they obviously outnumber deaths as a
result of escalation.

On the other hand this is not alt.parenting.deaths-caused-by-
automobiles-swimming pools-and-medical-mistakes, is it, lil 'o'?

If those are your concern why aren't you posting in related newsgroups?

You are here. Spanking is the subject of this ng. And the risks of
spanking on topic.

No, those were YOUR Strawmen, you feed them somewhere else, if you don't
mind.

And let's discuss the dangers of spanking, like the nasty figure I just
provided that you care:

The Department of Health and Human Services and the New England Journal
of Medicine estimate that 1,000 to 2,000 children die every year in the
U.S. from corporal punishment that has escalated to a lethal level. They
estimate that 142,000 are seriously injured annually. 1

http://www.religioustolerance.org/spanking.htm

Shall we try again without your bales of straw?

Or have you NO rational argument to support spanking that would NOT risk
these injuries and deaths to children?


0:->

>
>
> Carlson LaVonne wrote:
>> Don't you know that these deaths do not result spanking, the practice of
>> hitting and hurting children in the name of discipline? These are
>> deaths that result from abuse, the practice of hitting and hurting
>> children in the name of discipline. Don't you see the difference?
>>
>> There are no boundaries in hitting and hurting children in the name of
>> discipline, but there are boundaries for the same behavior when the
>> victim is over the age of 18.
>>
>> It's called battery and assault in every state in the US.
>>
>> LaVonne
>>
>>
>>
>> 0:-> wrote:
>>
>>> The Department of Health and Human Services and the New England Journal
>>> of Medicine estimate that 1,000 to 2,000 children die every year in the
>>> U.S. from corporal punishment that has escalated to a lethal level. They
>>> estimate that 142,000 are seriously injured annually. 1
>>>
>>> http://www.religioustolerance.org/spanking.htm
>>>
>>> That's the problem I've pointed out here for a couple of years. Parents
>>> often do NOT know where the boundaries are, and cross them all to easily.
>>>
>>> Even a child jumping away or startling or making a normal human
>>> protective move can be badly injured or killed.
>>>
>>> Why risk it?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Doan

unread,
Apr 17, 2006, 2:09:38 PM4/17/06
to

These are already covered under child abuse laws.

AFfromDreamLand

Doan

unread,
Apr 17, 2006, 2:21:03 PM4/17/06
to

And yet, the police still carried batons! I guess if the police striked
you with a baton, it's not assault but a if a parent spanked his/her kid,
it is! Logic and the anti-spanking zealotS.... ;-)

Doan

0:->

unread,
Apr 17, 2006, 2:58:42 PM4/17/06
to
Doan wrote:
> These are already covered under child abuse laws.

No they aren't. From pre abuse to post abuse is the issue, not just post
abuse.

The issue is "escalation," not one or the other alone.

In other words, a percentage of spankers ANNUALLY, so you must add them
to each passing year...meaning that before the 18th year is
reached...18,000 to 36,000 children, approximately, are killed by
parents that escalate to it from "spanking," and approximately 2,556,000
are injured.

We aren't talking anything here but people that CANNOT ANSWER THE
QUESTION. They think they can, of course, but you do see the results
above, right?

Do you really suppose if I had put the question to them before they
escalated to injury and death they would have admitted they could not
answer The Question?

No, they would have answered JUST AS YOU DID, DOAN. "What the Law says."
"What a reasonable person would say." "Parents can judge that for
themselves better than the state." etc. Plus of course, "It's none of
the state's business what I choose to discipline my children."

I don't recall you mentioning the last one, but you have said, "Leave
that up to the parents to decide."

0:->

0:->

unread,
Apr 17, 2006, 3:04:01 PM4/17/06
to
Doan wrote:
> And yet, the police still carried batons! I guess if the police striked
> you with a baton, it's not assault

That depends on the circumstances. It would be if the police tried to do
so for the same reason parents spank.

> but a if a parent spanked his/her kid,
> it is!

The only thing in reality standing between it being legal and illegal
assault is the law, nothing more.

Morally and factually it is assault on a child.

> Logic and the anti-spanking zealotS.... ;-)

You must be one of the anti-spanking zealotS.

You certainly bring no logic to this issue.

To hit a child and lie to yourself that it's not hitting?
>
> Doan
>

0:->


> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Carlson LaVonne wrote:
>
>> Don't you know that these deaths do not result spanking, the practice of
>> hitting and hurting children in the name of discipline? These are
>> deaths that result from abuse, the practice of hitting and hurting
>> children in the name of discipline. Don't you see the difference?
>>
>> There are no boundaries in hitting and hurting children in the name of
>> discipline, but there are boundaries for the same behavior when the
>> victim is over the age of 18.
>>
>> It's called battery and assault in every state in the US.
>>
>> LaVonne
>>
>>
>>
>> 0:-> wrote:
>>
>>> The Department of Health and Human Services and the New England Journal
>>> of Medicine estimate that 1,000 to 2,000 children die every year in the
>>> U.S. from corporal punishment that has escalated to a lethal level. They
>>> estimate that 142,000 are seriously injured annually. 1
>>>
>>> http://www.religioustolerance.org/spanking.htm
>>>
>>> That's the problem I've pointed out here for a couple of years. Parents
>>> often do NOT know where the boundaries are, and cross them all to easily.
>>>
>>> Even a child jumping away or startling or making a normal human
>>> protective move can be badly injured or killed.
>>>
>>> Why risk it?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Greegor

unread,
Apr 18, 2006, 3:11:59 AM4/18/06
to
When they plaster Big Brother's face all over
the place, Kane wants it to be HIS face!

0:->

unread,
Apr 18, 2006, 8:27:32 AM4/18/06
to
Greegor wrote:
> When they plaster Big Brother's face all over
> the place, Kane wants it to be HIS face!

If you had an argument of any merit you'd make it rather than a constant
string of ad hom.

Any reason you have not answered the reasonable questions I ask?

Any issue you wish to promote in the area of parental spanking?

fistoffury

unread,
Apr 18, 2006, 12:08:06 PM4/18/06
to

Ive read the website that the initial poster gave us. The website says
that lots of people recall their grandparents spanking them even if
their parents never did. How can grandparents spank? How can they be
allowed to? Especially if the parents dont.

0:->

unread,
May 12, 2006, 5:28:56 PM5/12/06
to

Opinions wrote:
> How many deaths resulted from spanking as defined by normal people?

Between 1,000 and 2,000 a year, lil 'o'. That's what the point was of
my posting.
The USDHHS estimated it.

They started spanking legally and escalated. That's what escalated in
this context means....from the legal (which we have to presume reflects
the "norm" you refer to) to teh illegal and death. Thousands more
children injured by the same mechanism.

Make you happy, does it...so much so you'd try to minimize it as you do
above and below?

> How does this number of deaths compare with deaths caused by
> automobiles, swimming pools, and medical mistakes?

How does it compare with skateboard, bucket drownings of toddlers,
falls out windows, disease, starvation, neglect by parents....just what
does comparison tell us, lil 'o'?

Other than your attempt to divert for minimization of this crime that
began as a legal sanctioned practice?

I can assure you that drowning deaths probably in same age range where
children are kiled by escaspanking (escalated spanking), are less than
a thousand a year. The Product Safety division has posted this
information, and I'm sick and tired of YOU asking such questions
without looking them up yourself...but of course if you did YOU'D HAVE
NOTHING TO SAY, because they prove you are stupid and ignorant and
wrong every time.

However, how could that be a bad thing?

I'd love if you came up with facts. Because if you did, you and I would
be partners in trying to stop this insanity of death dealing
'spanking.'

But since YOU are part of the problem, I hardly can expect THAT to
happen.

So tell us, now that I've told you (and I looked it up, Stupid) that
drowning deaths of the most fatalities for both groups, that is
escaspanking as well as drowning, isn't that big incomparision, are you
going to run over to the alt.talk.drowningdeathsofchildren ng and
suggest they stop worrying about fences around swimming pools?

Did you study to be stupid?

Over a thousand formerly living breathing human beings, small and
unable to protect themselves. Gone, forever. They aren't coming back.
They aren't in heaven. They aren't.

And by the end of this year, a thousand more. And the next year and the
next....etc.

You should go to jail with the parents that do it.

0:->

0 new messages