Fatty Foods Affect Memory and Exercise

DESCRIPTIONAlan Zale for The New York Times High-fat foods may have detrimental effects on muscle power and the brain.

Eating fatty food appears to take an almost immediate toll on both short-term memory and exercise performance, according to new research on rats and people.

Other studies have suggested that long-term consumption of a high-fat diet is associated with weight gain, heart disease and declines in cognitive function. But the new research shows how indulging in fatty foods over the course of a few days can affect the brain and body long before the extra pounds show up.

To determine the effect of a fatty diet on memory and muscle performance, researchers studied 32 rats that were fed low-fat rat chow and trained for two months to complete a challenging maze. The maze included eight different paths that ended with a treat of sweetened condensed milk. The goal was for the rat to find each treat without doubling back into a corridor where it had already been. The maze was wiped down with alcohol, so the rat had to rely on memory rather than sense of smell.

All of the rats studied had mastered the maze, finding at least six or seven of the eight treats before making a mistake. Some rats even found all eight on the first try.

Then half the rats were switched to high-fat rat chow (comprised of 55 percent fat), while the remaining rats stayed on their regular chow (which had 7.5 percent fat). After four days, the rats eating the fatty chow began to falter on the maze test — all of them did worse than when they were on their regular chow. On average, the rats on the fatty diet found only five treats before making a mistake. The rats who stayed with their regular food continued the same high level of performance on the maze, finding six or more treats before making a mistake.

Half of the rats had also been trained to run on a treadmill. After only a few days on the high-fat diet, the rats performed 30 percent worse on the treadmill. After five days of testing, the treadmill performance of the rats eating fatty foods had declined by half. The study results appear in The Faseb Journal, which is the journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

“We expected to see changes, but maybe not so dramatic and not in such a short space of time,’’ said Andrew Murray, the study’s lead author and a lecturer in physiology at Cambridge University in Britain. “It was really striking how quickly these effects happened.’’

Although the human data aren’t yet published, the researchers have also performed similar studies of high-fat diets in healthy young men who then performed exercise and cognitive tests. Dr. Murray said he is still reviewing the data, but the short-term effect of a fatty diet on humans appears to be similar to that found in the rat studies.

It’s not clear why fatty foods would cause a short-term decline in cognitive function. One theory is that a high-fat diet can trigger insulin resistance, which means the body becomes less efficient at using the glucose, or blood sugar, so important to brain function.

Fatty foods appear to have a short-term effect on exercise performance because the body reacts to high fat content in the blood by releasing certain proteins that essentially make the metabolism less efficient. “It’s thought to be a protective mechanism to get rid of excess fat,’’ Dr. Murray said. “But it was making muscles less efficient at using oxygen and fuel to make the energy needed to run.’’

The findings are particularly relevant to people who may not worry about binging on fatty foods because they exercise regularly.

“Exercise is a good way of burning it off, because you’re burning the calories off,’’ Dr. Murray said. “But in terms of actually trying to put in a good time if you’re running, it will limit your performance.’’

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Something I like to call “food coma” :)

Darya @SummerTomato August 13, 2009 · 1:15 pm

I’m always skeptical of the conclusions drawn from rat diet studies. The lab chow these animals get is so processed (think PowerBar), I don’t see how it is different from the processed foods in the grocery store. No matter what percentage of macronutrients are in the food, couldn’t it all be considered junk?

So does this really tell us anything about a human diet or healthy eating for that matter?

FROM TPP — I point out in the story that unpublished data on human subjects found the same effect.

Maybe the rats on the low fat diet are more motivated to find the treats?

FROM TPP — That’s a really interesting point, but the rats on the low fat diet weren’t going hungry. The measure here wasn’t how fast the rats found the treats, it was a memory test. In fact, among the rats who weren’t exercising, there was no difference in the amount of time it took them to find the treats whether they were on the low-fat or high-fat chow. It’s just that the high-fat rats made more mistakes. The exercising high-fat rats were slower, but they could’ve just been tired since they had just performed the treadmill test prior to the maze test.

This article showed up in my RSS reader at the exact post-lunch moment when I was about to give into the temptation to walk down the street to our local ice cream shop for a hot fudge sundae. After reading the article I ate an apple instead ;-)

FROM TPP — I don’t know whether to congratulate you for your good choice or to apologize for ruining your treat.

This research seems to be somewhat flawed. If this were the case, then Eskimos and their sled dogs would have a hard time getting going on their diet of whale/seal blubber and fish. They wouldn’t only forget where they were going but wouldn’t have enough energy to get there! I didn’t realize they had a ready supply of donuts and spinach to keep them up to speed.

The Healthy Librarian August 13, 2009 · 1:39 pm

Tara,

Thanks for this latest addition.

As far as I’m concerned–it’s all about protecting the brain as we age–trumping heart disease and cancer.

A number of recent studies have all come to the same conclusions when it comes to protecting memory and cognition.

1. What we eat does make a difference to brain health.

2. Exercise is like an elixir for the brain.

3. Midlife belly fat and midlife cholesterol are brain-risks

4. Blood sugar spikes damage the memory center of the brain. Low-glycemic foods & exercise moderate the damage.

The Healthy Librarian’s Brain Back-Up on a Better Brain: Midlife Cholesterol, Belly Fat, Grape Juice, Berries, Blood Sugar, Naps, and Better Sleep

//www.happyhealthylonglife.com/happy_healthy_long_life/2009/08/brain-backup.html

i would like to know what type of fat was used in the rat chow considering “healthy” fats such as omega-3-fatty acids found in avocado, walnuts and flax seed (all high in “fat” content) improve cardiac and cognitive function.

FROM TPP — People who are focused on consuming healthful fats from fish, nuts etc. are not typically consuming diets comprised of 55% fat.

To answer your question about the rat chow:

Low-fat rat chow (a standard formula for lab rats)
7.5% fat, 17.5% protein, 75% carb
The fatty acid composition was 19% saturated fatty acids, 18% monounsaturated fatty acids, 62% polyunsaturated fatty acids, and 6% omega-3.

The high-fat rat chow
55% fat, 29% protein, 16% carb
The fatty acid composition was 27% saturated fatty acid, 48% monounsaturated fatty acid and 25% polyunsaturated fatty acid.



AND MORE INFO FROM DR. MURRAY:

This particular study didn’t look at any specific fat types, but used a fairly normal mix of saturated, polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fats, as well as long chain and medium chain fatty acids. The readers are absolutely right that not all are likely to be equal, so we are carrying out further studies to flush out the real culprits. My own feeling is that the long chain fats are the worst offenders when it comes to decreasing metabolic efficiency, with medium chain fatty acids (such as those in coconut oil) possibly being less detrimental.

Hmmmm… I guess I’ll have to go running BEFORE I go to the county fair tomorrow and eat all those deep fried twinkies.

This is bad science. We get tired after a large satisfying meal not because fat is eating away at our brain like some kind of alien parasite, but rather because of the fact that digestion diverts blood to the many organs that do the digestion – all the guts, liver, etc. – and away from the brain. Lions don’t nap after a kill because they ate too much saturated fat and should have had bananas.

The article is not written by a close reader of nutritional literature. The statement, “It’s already known that long-term consumption of a high-fat diet is associated with weight gain, heart disease and declines in cognitive function” is not supported by the bulk of science, as illustrated by excellent books such as “Good Calories, Bad Calories” by Gary Taubes, PhD, and “Trick and Treat: How Healthy Eating is Making Us Ill” by Barry Groves, PhD.

DrCate
DrCate.com

why would an elephant(with lots of fat) has good memory ?
rest my case.

Darya @SummerTomato August 13, 2009 · 2:23 pm

I guess I’m just skeptical of studying macronutrients on performance in general. Do all fats cause this effect or only some kinds? Is it effected by dietary context? Does this apply to everyone? Hopefully the human studies they are working on are more nuanced.

Maybe their need for fat was met so they were not as motivated to find it.

FROM DR. MURRAY:

A lot of comments have asked if the rats were not motivated in the maze because they were not hungry. Neither group were hungry, as they were fed food freely. They run the maze because that is what they have been trained to do. The high fat rats weren’t demotivated either, as they still ran around the maze trying to find the rewards, they simply found it harder to remember which arms they’d been to before. An additional part of the motivation for the rats to finish the task is that they know that they can then go back to their home cage. If they were demotivated they would just sit in the maze for 5 minutes and not bother searching for the treats.

Hello–it is only natural that if rats–or people–are hungry, our senses and wits become keener, since we need them to seek food for survival. This is known–so how come it was not reflected in this isolated-sounding study?

Somehow I always connect the fatty food eating with the absolutely terrible advertising that we see on TV. Since when is the overweight 40ish male a good image? We, as women are convinced that if we do not weigh 105 and spend our free time in pilates we are worthless. As an RN who was an ER nurse, I have seen countless flabby white males come in with heart attacks. Let’s just keep pushing the same messages on TV…eat junk, inhale high fructose corn syrup, sit and watch TV all day and night and don’t communicate with your family. And don’t forget to pass that information on to your kids. You are sure to get fatter, lazier and certainly more stupid.
//www.caringisnotenough.net

This mirrors the quasi documentary from a few years back – Super Size Me.

“It’s already known that long-term consumption of a high-fat diet is associated with weight gain, heart disease and declines in cognitive function.”

No, Tara, it’s not “known.” It’s suspected.

Nor is it “known” whether, all things being equal (regardless of whether you compare by amount eaten by mass or calories), a high fat diet is any worse for you than a high carb diet.

FROM TPP — I didn’t say it’s known to cause. It’s known to be associated.

Oh, not the same old “fat is evil” angle again.

Here’s my own experience (full disclosure: I am not a rat)
If I eat a breakfast that contains protein and fat (carbs are unimportant but nearly inevitable), I am more awake and do not get hungry until well past noon. If I eat a low-fat breakfast (which I will do only out of desperation, if I am in a place where only bagels and such are available and no eggs, cheese, butter or meat), I am hungry within about 2 hours. On the other hand, if I eat at all before a run, which I rarely do, straight carbs and/or sugar are about all I can tolerate.

I have been observing the effects of different foods on the way I feel for many years, and the results are totally reproducible.

Admittedly, everyone’s metabolism is different. Others may not have the same result. But then, every rat’s metabolism is different too.

1. What we eat does make a difference to brain health.
If u don’t eat you are brain dead.

2. Exercise is like an elixir for the brain.
big muscle guys are not any smarter than small guys.
may be reversed.

3. Midlife belly fat and midlife cholesterol are brain-risks
once again.eat just enough..not too much , not too little.
it’s all about the amount of cal. you eat that got absorbed…
not type of food.

4. Blood sugar spikes damage the memory center of the brain. Low-glycemic foods & exercise moderate the damage.
really?
everytime you eat..fat or not fat, sugar spike.
fat takes the longest to digest, so it takes the longest to convert to blood sugar..so it will spike the least..
So how does that effect the brain?

The NYT shows their State-loving bias yet again, when researcher after researcher have shown that high fat diets do NOT contribute to high blood pressure, weight gain, etc.

After the notorious “food pyramid” fiasco of decades which pushed U.S. citizens to eat many carbohydrates and lower fat intake, the country overall became obese and diabetic. Blood pressures and weights skyrocketed.

I had this problem, too. Following Mercola, Atkins, and a slew of actual research doctors, I shed all my weight, have tons of energy, my skin and hair and nails are healthy, and my blood pressure and triglycerides dropped.

Don’t believe this hype.

What? Tell me that again. Slowly.

You’re only just noticing this now? As someone who switched from a high-fat diet (such as the one pictured) in my youth and adolescence to a low-fat, fresh-cooked no-fast-food vegan diet in college – and has happily stayed on it for nearly 35 years – I could have told you: This stuff makes you slow, stupid., and smelly (check the NYT Mag entry a while back in the year’s 100 ideas issue, on “the term vegansexual.” – vegans who won’t have sex with carnivores because the latter have a pong).

I am a little cautious about diet studies on rats in particular, but other species in general. Though other mammals are very similar to us in many ways, there are huge differences in the ways we process foods. For instance I put my dog on a super high protein high fat diet and his digestive issues disappeared. This is very much counter to what you’d expect in a human. (And his previous diet was grain-free, etc, so this was not do to allergies.)\

I have heard that rats, in particular are sensitive to diet changes. There have been many studies on rat-diets that don’t seem to generalize to humans.

Does this mean the Atkins Diet will make you slow and dumb?

I was going to ask the exact same thing as rv did– what kinds of fat? Transfat? Sure, I would agree there- transfat would have a negative effect on cognitive ability and memory.

But I have to point out a correction to rv– avocados are not good sources of omega 3s, they are primarily Omega 6.

Walnuts and flax do contain Omega 3 but human don’t convert the plant-based fatty acid ALA to DHA/EPA very effectively. Your best source of Omega 3s are from fish.

Could this be a short term adaptation effect? I’d be more convinced if the effect held true 3-6 months later.