Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN No:-2456-2165
VI. RESULT
Table 1 Pearson's Correlation between the Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Life
QOL SWL
QOL Pearson Correlation 1 .136
Sig. (2-tailed) .054
N 200 200
SWL Pearson Correlation .136 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .054
N 200 200
Table 2 Descriptive indexes for mean and SD values of quality of life and satisfaction with life scores according to male and
female
Gender N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
QOL Male 100 87.17 10.838 1.084
Female 100 78.85 14.053 1.405
SWL Male 100 25.36 6.777 .678
Female 100 24.06 6.093 .609
Table 3: T-test (Independent Samples Test) results to evaluate male and female students based on quality of life and life
satisfaction scores
Levene's Test
for Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Sig. Interval of the
(2- Mean Std. Error Difference
F Sig. t DF tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper
QOL Equal variances
assumed 12.423 .001 4.688 198 .000 8.320 1.775 4.820 11.820
Equal variancesnot
assumed
4.688 185.991 .000 8.320 1.775 4.819 11.821
SWL Equal variances
assumed 3.801 .053 1.426 198 .155 1.300 .911 -.497 3.097
Equal variancesnot
assumed 1.426 195.801 .155 1.300 .911 -.497 3.097
An independent-samples t-test was conducted to positively with satisfaction in other aspects of life, as studies
determine if a difference existed between themean quality of have shown. A study was done to estimate the efficacy of
life and satisfaction with life scores of males and females. the plan for improving a couple's quality of life on their
There was statistically significant difference between the relationship and internal health. In the experimental group,
mean quality of life score of males (M=87.17, SD= 10.838) the couples attended training to improve romantic
and female (M= 78.85, SD= 14.053), t (198) =4.688, p connection, improve love magnetism, improve closeness,
= .000. The 95% confidence interval was 4.820 to 11.820. power-sharing, conflict resolution skills, resolve endless
And there was statistically significant difference between problems and give meaning to life. The results of another
the mean satisfaction with life score of males (M= 25.36, study showed that a high score on the quality of life affects
SD= 6.777) and female (M= 24.06, SD= 6.093), t (198) = job satisfaction. The interchange initiative was in the
1.426, p = .155. The 95% confidence interval was -.497 to direction of analysis of the considerable distinction between
3.097. Consequently, the second null hypothesis (H0) was a female with male clusters inside mean scores resting on
rejected; it means there is a significant difference between quality of life and satisfaction with life.
male and female groups in mean scores on quality of life
and life satisfaction. In the T-test outcome, the quality of life score in the
middle of the male scholars in the current study is
VII. DISCUSSION significantly added higher than that of female scholars; in
addition in this container, males are additionally satisfied
In the present study, a significant correlation exists with their existing situation than females. In further studies
between the quality of life and satisfaction with life with reference to gender disparity, there are numerous
(P<0.05). Since some aspects of physical and internal contentious findings taking place on the relation between
health contribute to the quality of life, In addition to quality of life and life satisfaction gain. Intended for design,
environmental and social health, a high score in quality of Saadat et. al (2010) plants refusal association stuck between
life indicates the existent is in good health; additionally, it the quality of life score and sexual category. In relationship
seems only natural that one with a high quality of life would by means of satisfaction, it was observed that life
also be very satisfied. The quality of life correlates satisfaction; in particular instruction satisfaction is added in
REFERENCES