Betreff: Was für eine Schande |
Von: "KHM FRIZ GmbH" |
Datum: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 08:09:22 +0200 |
Government
Insider Says Bush
Authorized 911 Attacks
>From Thomas Buyea 9-17-4
Keep in mind when reading
this, that the man being interviewed is no two-bit internet conspiracy
buff. Stanley Hilton was a senior
advisor to Sen Bob Dole (R) and has personally known Rumsfeld and
Wolfowitz for decades. This courageous man has risked his professional
reputation, and possibly his life, to get this information out to
people. The following is from his
latest visit to Alex Jones' radio show.
Forwarded with Compliments of
Free Voice of Note: All honor to Stanley
Hilton for risking his life so that we may know the truth of 9/11. The Bush Junta Unmasked "This (9/11) was all planned.
This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the
order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason
and mass murder." -- Alex Jones interview of
Stanley Hilton, attorney for 911 taxpayers' lawsuit Alex Jones Radio Show
September 10, 2004 Transcription by 'RatCat' AJ: He is back with us. He is
former Bob Dole's chief of staff, very successful counselor, lawyer. He
represents hundreds of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing Bush
for involvement in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out - half of New
Yorkers think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for
the next 35 minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. SH: Glad to be on. AJ: We'll have to recap this
when we start the next hour, but just in a nutshell, you have a lawsuit
going, you've deposed a lot of military officers. You know the truth of
9/11. Just in a nutshell, what is your case alleging? SH: Our case is alleging that
Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so
forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and
allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush
personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating
documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this
event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus
political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in
the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went
to school with some of these neocons. At the AJ: That's right. They were
all Straussian followers of a Nazi-like professor. And now they are
setting it up here in SH: 7 billion, 7 billion AJ: Yeah, 7 billion. Can you
go over some of the new and incriminating evidence you've got of them
ordering the attack? SH: Yes, let me just say that
this is a taxpayers' class action lawsuit as well as a suit on behalf
of the families and the basic three arguments are they violated the
Constitution by ordering this event. And secondly that they [garbled]
fraudulent Federal Claims Act, Title 31 of the U.S. Code in which Bush
presented false and fraudulent evidence to Congress to get the Iraq war
authorization. And, of course, he related it to 9/11 and claimed that
Saddam was involved with that, and all these lies. AJ: Tell you what, stay there.
AJ: All right my friends,
second hour, September 10th, 2004, the anniversary of the globalist
attack coming up tomorrow. It's an amazing individual we have on the
line. Bob Dole's former chief of staff, political scientist, a lawyer,
he went to school with Rumsfeld and others, he wrote his thesis about
how to turn America into a dictatorship using a fake Pearl Harbor
attack. He's suing the SH: Yeah, we are suing Bush,
Condoleezza Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Mueller, etc. for complicity in
personally not only allowing 9/11 to happen but in ordering it. The
hijackers we retained and we had a witness who is married to one of
them. The hijackers were AJ: Absolutely and now it has
come out - five separate drills of flying hijacked jets into buildings
that morning - which you told us about before it even broke in the
Associated Press. They were trying to get out ahead of you. You talked
about how you interviewed military people who were told it was a drill
that morning. Then to get out ahead of that, the news finally reported
on it. Now, we've learned that all these operations - I want to get
into that, I want to talk about the new incriminating evidence of
ordering it and how they had drilled on this, how Cheney was in the
bunker controlling this. That has even come out in the mainstream news
but they won't release the details of that, AJ: Stay there, Stanley, Bob
Dole's former chief of staff. We'll come back after this quick break.
Please stay with us. BREAK AJ: All right, eight minutes,
25 seconds into the second hour. Stanley Hilton, political scientist,
lawyer, Bob Dole's former chief of staff, is suing the government for 7
billion dollars for carrying out 9/11 and for racketeering. And he
joins us now. During the break, I first really did the big interview
with Stanley Hilton after I saw him attacked on Fox News. And that
interview got massive attention. And then he kind of went underground
for a while because a judge, we're going to talk about that, ordered
him to not do any more interviews. And now he's back doing interviews.
He's had his office broken into, FBI threats and harassment. Bottom
line, he has deposed military individuals, wives of hijackers, you name
it, it was a government operation. It has even come out in mainstream
news, a piece here, a piece there. They had drills on 9/11, that's why
NORAD stood down. Cheney was in control of the whole thing. Stanley
Hilton has now gotten documents about how Bush ordered the whole
operation. And I'll tell you right now, his life is in danger, folks.
And he's got so much courage. He went to school with these neocons at
the SH: I did an interview with
you, Alex, back in March of 2003, about a year and a half ago, and
literally two weeks after that, I was contacted by the emissary of the
chief judge of the federal court where I have the lawsuit. And I was
warned not to publicize it but to keep it quiet and threatened with
discipline. And it remained quiet until a couple of months ago and then
I got on the air on some programs and some publicity and July 1st, I
was threatened directly by the chief judge here, threatened with court
discipline. This particular judge has been circulating
communiqués to the other federal judges seeking anything
negative she can get against me to try and discipline me after I've
been on the court here for 30 years with no disciplinary problems at
all. This is suddenly happening. And her assistants who are on the
committee of the court met with me on July 1st in AJ: It's all color of law. No
direct orders, just all in your face. SH: They sent a letter out,
and of course they deny it's because of the political content of the
suit but they told me directly on the phone that it is because of this
suit and this judge is very, very angry, apparently has been in contact
with Ashcroft's Justice Department. I got a call from Ashcroft's
Justice Department a few months ago about this, demanding that I drop
the suit, threatening sanctions and all kinds of things. I refused to
drop it. AJ: Now let's go back over, you had them break into your
office, harassment. Let's go over that in detail. SH: My office was broken into
about 6 months ago. The file cabinets - it was obvious they had been
rifled through. Files were stolen. Files dealing with this particular
case and particularly with the documents I had regarding the fact that
the - some of these hijackers, at least some of them were on the
payroll of the AJ: Now, let's talk about what
they want you to drop. Let's talk about, without giving names, the
people you deposed, what really happened, the picture you've got. You
said earlier that Bush ordered this, they were simulating this which
they now admit there were simulations on that morning. Let's go over
what they don't want you to talk about, SH: We have evidence both
documentary as well as witness sworn statements from undercover former
FBI agents, FBI informants, etc., that other officials in the Pentagon
and the military and the Air Force that deal with the fact that there
were many drills, many rehearsals for 9/11 before it happened. Bush had
seen this simulated on TV many times. He blurted this out at a press
conference in AJ: And now Mayor Giuliani, a
few months ago in the 911 Commission, admitted that - Tripod II. They
had their whole command post already moved out of Building 7. Now, this
is very, very important. This is a key area of this whole event. You
said months before it came out on the CIA's own website and the
Associated Press, you said I deposed people. They said there were
drills that morning and exactly what happened, happening - that was the
smoke-screen for the stand-down. And then to get out ahead of it, the
CIA comes out and said yeah we were running a drill that morning. Now,
we've learned that five, possibly six, were confirmed. Five of these -
one drill with the exact same thing happening that actually happened,
at the exact same time in the morning. That's why NORAD stood down with
24 different blips on the screen. You've said this. You brought this up
first. Now, I know you can't get too much into detail but can you tell
us how you learned of this? SH: I have interviewed
individuals in NORAD and the Air Force. I personally toured NORAD many
years ago around the time that I worked for Dole. I'm very familiar
with the operations at AJ: But five drills that day. SH: That day, that day, and
Bush thought it was a drill. That's the only explanation for why he
appeared nonchalant AJ: We also had NORAD officers
and civilian air traffic controllers going, "Is this part of the
exercise? Is this a drill?" SH: Yes. AJ: On the tapes and in TV
interviews, they thought it was, quote, a drill. SH: That's right. That's
exactly what I said long before it became public. I've known about this
since earlier in March of '03, as I stated before. This was all
planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally
signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of
treason and mass murder. And now, obstruction of justice by attempting
to use a federal judge and FBI agents to inhibit a legitimate civil
lawsuit in this country, in federal court. Even a chief judge in this
court tried to harass and threaten me personally for representing
legitimate plaintiffs. And they got AJ: Well, I mean look, they
say they never heard of a plan to fly planes into buildings - said it
all over television - Rice, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft. And then
we find out they were running all these drills that morning. Even if
they weren't involved, that proves they were liars about ever hearing
of such a plan. SH: Well, I'm trying to take
their depositions - I've been trying to take their depositions for
months. They've been trying to object to it. They will have to admit
they were either lying then or now. It's clearly perjury either way.
They are liars and perjurers; that's what they are. These are the
people that we have running this government and, of course, they knew
about it. How are they going to claim now that they didn't know about
these drills? Their idea is that nobody knew anything. It's the old
know-nothing mentality. And how anybody considers this believable is
beyond me. AJ: All right, now people ask
how could a huge organization, how could the AWACs, how could the
military let this happen; whereas before, if your Cessna got off course
for five minutes, they would launch F-16s on you. It's real simple.
It's what Stanley Hilton said here a year and a half ago. It's what
came out in the news after that. The military, good people, were told
this was all a drill. And it was not a drill. And ABC News admits that
Cheney was in control of [?] out of the White House [?] and that he
ordered the military to quote "do something." Our inside sources from
Hilton and others say it was a stand down and they admit they will not
release that under national security. SH: Well they are going to
admit it, they're going to release it in the court case because if you
demand it under subpoena powers and they must release it. And part of
our lawsuit is brought in the name of the AJ: I think you need to
publicly tell folks that you are not planning suicide. Would you like
to tell folks that? SH: (laughs) I'm not planning
suicide. I've got family and I'm not planning that but I don't like the
threats I'm under - but I can tell you this, it's taking a toll
emotionally on me and my staff. And particularly, when you get a threat
from the chief judge of your own court.
AJ: Why have you decided to go
public again after a year of being under the radar? SH: Because the
more and more evidence that I've been adducing over a year and a half
has made it so obvious to me that this was now without any doubt a
government operation and that it amounts to the biggest act of treason
and mass murder in American history. I mean George Bush makes Benedict
Arnold look like a patriot. He makes Benedict Arnold look like George
Washington. I mean that's what we have - a criminal and a traitor
sitting in the White House pretending he's a patriot, wrapping himself
in the flag. And it's pretty disgusting because the other side of the
so-called opposition, the Kerry camp is just saying nothing because
they're afraid to speak. AJ: Stay right there. We'll be
right back. BREAK AJ: AJ: I mean let's look at this.
Not only are there dress rehearsals, they are smoke screens so the good
military stands down and doesn't know what's happening. But it's now
coming out, even in mainstream news, that yes these drills were going
on. Yes, and some of these drills, quote, passenger-type jets were
under remote control - this is decades old technology. In 1958, NORAD
was [ ] old jets and using them for target practice. Decades ago they
flew jumbo jets from LA to Sidney Australia. So since that's going on,
everybody knows that. And it's the same MO. Just like the first SH: It's one of the things
that we are looking into - that nerve gas or something else disabled
people. It's possible. I can't say for sure to be honest with you AJ: All you know is they were
government agents and they were on board and the planes were remote
controlled. SH: Yeah, it was basically a
smokescreen. I mean, the events of the hijackings, how someone snuck in
those cutters, it was a plant. It was like a classic decoy. I've got
some military background. And it's called decoy. It's a decoy
operation. You make the people focus on the decoy to avoid looking at
the real criminals. So they are focusing on these so-called nineteen
hijackers and saying, "Oh, it must have been these Arabs. When, in
fact, the guilty person is at SH: Yeah, the media is only
interested in maintaining the official government fantasy that this was
a little lone Arab. These Arabs couldn't even steer that plane down a
runway. AJ: Stay there AJ: Mr. Hilton, when you talk
to these FBI agents, when you talk to these military men and women,
what's their attitude? They've got to be pretty freaked out to have the
big picture and know what actually happened on 9/11. SH: Yes, you know it's like
clouds just before a thunderstorm in the sense that they are sort of
pregnant with rage. They are just enraged at the criminal politicians
who have perverted and misused the government to murder its own
citizens and pursue these dubious political ends. And many of them, in
increasing numbers, are willing to talk and will talk under subpoena -
but only under subpoena because the official party line of the
government is shut up and don't talk to the trial lawyer. But more and
more, they are very outraged that part of the government has done this
to its own people, to its own people. I mean you have to go back to
Stalin to see something - not even Hitler did this to his own people.
You have to look at Stalin who murdered the Kulaks, the Russians for
his own dubious gains. Also we've got - we have a Stalinist mentality
in this country. And, if these people pose as patriots and wrap
themselves in the flag, it's disgusting. I wanted also to point out
that the Japanese television network, Asahi, is going to be airing a
special on primetime tomorrow, on September 11th. They interviewed me
for eight hours a couple of weeks ago. I'll be on that. I wish - of
course, the AJ: Stanley, the globalists,
the new world order crowd, definitely intend to carry out more terror
attacks. I know they would have carried out more attacks if we wouldn't
have done what we've been up to, if you wouldn't have been out there
boldly speaking out and many others. And then their electronic SH: Well, yeah, I think they
have an agenda. They have contingency plans. I think they are laying
low now because there are an increasing number of people, like myself,
who are openly challenging them and accusing them of criminal conduct.
I think they would have done it again if we had not spoken up. I think
they're planning, what they would like to do is silence any dissenters.
That's why we are trying to get the Patriot Act declared
unconstitutional in this lawsuit also.
AJ: Let's talk about polls. In
the beginning a patriot is a scarce man, hated and feared, but in time
when his cause succeeds, the timid join him, because then it costs
nothing to be a patriot. You are one of those guys who hit the barbwire
for us, or figuratively jumped on the hand grenade for SH: Well, I think that's why
they want the Patriot Act to suppress political dissent. They have to,
they're anticipating, they are not dumb individuals. I know these
people personally, Wolfowitz. These are criminal individuals but they
are smart and so they anticipated political dissent. And that's why,
like the Nazis, their forebears, and their blood brothers, the Nazis
and the Stalinists, they're all for political repression. Every corrupt
and criminal government has done this - they suppress their own people:
Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, Mao Tse-Tung, that's why we have the
Patriot Act. So it's hand in hand. They had it planned to go right up
to September 11th, this was all part of the plan. You have to do it. It
was part of my senior thesis. You must follow through the terrorists
attacks with a political suppression mechanism in the law. And that's
why they want Patriot I and Patriot II and their plans are to continue
launching more terrorist attacks to justify even more repression. The
goal is to make this a one party dictatorship in this country, to
pursue their dubious ends with their blood brothers like the Saudi
Royal family. And also, historical blood brothers, such as the Nazi
Germany and the Communist Russian. That's the goal AJ: You've got to go in just a
minute or two. But I wanted to also tell you about SH: Well, that's right, the
word terrorist is now being overly broad and overly defined [garbled]
and also, you know, it's like the word communist was used for anything
during the McCarthy witch hunt. And anybody can be called a terrorist
by Bush's definition. But the irony is that the number one terrorist in
the world is living at the White House at the oval office today. That's
the real irony. For sheer hypocrisy, I think he deserves the world
prize and ought to be in the Ripley book, Believe It or Not, and the
Guinness book of world records for sheer brazen chicanery and fraud. AJ: Let me ask you a question
on this because this is the experience that I had. Watching television,
watching the killers, watching those that are guilty, stand up there as
our saviors is incredibly painful. It's like watching Ted Bundy being
the judge at his own trial. I mean it is just painful to know who these
people are. To see them putting SH: Yeah, it's very disturbing
and as one who has studied the theory and concept of dictatorships, I
personally interviewed Albert Speer, who was Hitler's armaments
minister. I interviewed him in 1981 in AJ: The answer is to expose
them as the terrorists, to show how PNAC [Project for the New American
Century] said we need helpful SH: Well, that's why they want
repression and, then again, the ancient old diversion, launch another
terrorist attack to get people to pitch it away. I mean who knows what
they'll do next. I mean their capacity for ingenious creation of these
events is sort of unraveled. I mean there is no limit. My guess is they
are going to try another stunt - maybe a stunt just before the election
to justify getting Bush reelected. Although it seems like he is running
against a straw man or a ghost right now, anyway. But, my guess is
they'll try some other tactic to get people's attention away from 9/11
if it gets to be too much attention. What you really want is for the
public to just lose interest because the public - and it's like
remember the AJ: We are at a crossroads, I
don't think they anticipated this much resistance, Stanley. SH: Yeah, I hope they are
truly wrong and as incompetent as they are corrupt and guilty. That
means their incompetence is exceeded only by their corruption and their
guilt. And eventually, if enough people are going to get outraged
enough, these people in the bureaucracy and in the civil service and
our military, and eventually we can get people under subpoena these
individuals will be exposed. AJ: SH: Sure, just give me a call. AJ: God bless you my friend.
Any closing comments? SH: My closing comments would
be, I think people ought to just think about the consequence of having
someone like Bush in the White House and the danger for the future that
these sorts of individuals pose. This is not just a historical event of
the past. This is part of the plan and the camera is still rolling.
They have an agenda. These individuals are extremely dangerous. They
are armed and dangerous. They pose a clear and dangerous threat to
every freedom-loving person not only American but in the whole world. AJ: You are absolutely right
Stanley Hilton. They have captured the government. They have not
captured the peoples' minds and they are counting on us not facing up
to it. SH: And they are counting on
the repressive Patriot Act and threats and chief judges and FBI agents
threatening people who are exposing them. That's what they are counting
on. AJ: But you're not backing
down are you, my friend. SH: No, I'm not AJ: Well, we all stand with
you, my brother, and God bless you. SH: All right. Thank you. |