VISIBLE INJURIES inflicted by LEICS POLICE

No.16 INJURIES INFLICTED UPON US BY 11 LEICS POLICE ENFORCERS for PRIVATE CORPS of HM GOVERNMENT PLC

Along with 10 other officers including DAVID HANDISIDES PC957 ; And SAM BHATI PC 1172 ; And STUART CHARLES ANTHONY PARKER PC1841 ; Did on 25 MARCH 2022 terrorize, kidnap and imprison us. MATEV1 s81 app for Contempt of their own private court proceedings...

No.17

INJURIES INFLICTED UPON US BY 11 LEICS POLICE ENFORCERS for PRIVATE CORPS of HM GOVERNMENT PLC. MATEV2 Unrebutted Baron David Ward Decree of HM Government plc have no authority...

No.18

Leicester police refuse to show the body cam from any of the 11 enforcers who terrorized us 25.03.22. MATEV3 Unrebutted Baron David Ward Affidavit & Securitized Lien upon 657 Officers of the private ENTITY of HM Government plc Corporation/State have no authority without the wet ink consents of 60+ million men o' this land...

No. 19

CPS and all judiciary in Contempt of their own court--with not 1 Judicial order signed, sealed ; And not producing evidence of authority over any man ; And not showing evidence including hiding evidence. MATEV4 Our Unrebutted Affidavit & Securitized Lien upon 615 Officers of the private ENTITY of HM Government plc Corporation/State which includes the Baron David Ward Affidavit & Securitized Lien upon 657 Officers of the private ENTITY of HM Government plc Corporation/State have no authority without the wet ink consents of 60+ million men o' this land...

No. 20

DAVID HANDISIDES CONFIRMED HE BELIEVES HE CAN TERRORIZE WITH IMPUNITY TO SMASH UP MY PROPERTY. MATEV5 Chandran Kukathas Phd confirming the State is an ENTITY by way of an act of registration and all officers of the private ENTITY of HM Government plc Corporation/State have no authority without the wet ink consents of 60+ million men o' this land...

No. 21

JAMES YEOMAN CONFIRMED HE PHYSICALLY "LIFTED MY PROPERTY CORPOREAL". MATEV6 Sir Jack Beatson FBA confirming the Judiciary is a sub-office of the State ; the State is an ENTITY by way of an act of registration and all officers of the private ENTITY of HM Government plc Corporation/State have no authority without the wet ink consents of 60+ million men o' this land...

No.22

Leicester hospital took our property of data & passed to Leics ENFORCERS w/o our consent. MAT_EV07 Exhibit (D) The Companies Act 2006 “44 Execution of documents.

No.23

MATEV8 The Companies Act confirming that an ENTITY as is the State by way of an act of registration have no authority without the wet ink consents of 60+ million men o' this land....

No.24

MATEV9 confirming that our property is held in our Family Trust Under the Universal Community Trust and the ENTITY of 'State' and the ENFORCERs have no authority to or over our property corporeal ; Or property real ; Or property intangible...

No.25

MATEV10 the Trustees who would confirm our property is held in our Family Trust Under the Universal Community Trust and the ENTITY of 'State' and the ENFORCERs have no authority to or over our property corporeal ; Or property real ; Or property intangible should they have been contacted....

No.26

MATEV11 the Affidavit for the s81 application of Contempt of their private court omissions to be corrected including proof of authority by wet ink signatures....

No.27

MATEV12 the Affidavit for the further Contempt of their private court omissions and bias to be corrected....

No.28

MATEV13 the confirmation that the ENTITY of the private HM Government plc Corporation/State acts fraudulently and as terrorist to extort the 60+ million men o' this land with the police their trusted private army of ENFORCERs....

No.29

MATEV14 the confirmation that the sub-office judiciary of the ENTITY of the private HM Government plc Corporation/State acts to protect the officers of the stronger arms of the ENTITY including committing Contempt whilst claiming the judiciary is impartial....

MATEV15 the proof the judiciary acts in contempt of their own Charter and Articles of Memoranda whilst protecting itself and the other public officers including for non-judicial matters such as contract disputes where there is neither proof of contract nor proof of indebtedness...

MATEV16 thro MATEV29 the injuries inflicted by 11 Leicestershire Policy officers to terrorize a lone woman serving schools Cease and Desist from acting to harm children...

MATEV30 where the ENTITY of Royal Mail plc and the ENTITY of the Post Office are both shown to be fraudulently claiming their officers are delivering the letters and packages entrusted to them......

MATEV31 the repeated FORMAL CHALLENGE TO THE 12 PRESUMPTIONS OF LAW--LAWS WHICH ARE OF NO MATERIAL SUBSTANCE BEING ONLY A BELIEF...

MATERIAL EVIDENCE 1 to MATERIAL EVIDENCE 31

MATERIAL EVIDENCE 1

Along with 10 other officers including DAVID HANDISIDES PC957 ; And SAM BHATI PC 1172 ; And STUART CHARLES ANTHONY PARKER PC1841 ; Did on 25 MARCH 2022 terrorize, kidnap and imprison us.

MATERIAL EVIDENCE 2

CPS and all judiciary in Contempt of their own court--with not 1 Judicial order signed, sealed ; And not producing evidence of authority over any man ; And not showing evidence including hiding evidence. Leicester hospital took our property of data & passed to Leics ENFORCERS w/o our consent.What Happened? :INJURIES INFLICTED UPON US BY 11 LEICS POLICE ENFORCERS for PRIVATE CORPS of HM GOVERNMENT PLC. JAMES YEOMAN CONFIRMED HE PHYSICALLY "LIFTED MY PROPERTY CORPOREAL".

MATERIAL EVIDENCE 3

Leicester police refuse to show the body cam from the 11 enforcers who terrorized us 25.03.22. DAVID HANDISIDES CONFIRMED HE BELIEVES HE CAN TERRORIZE WITH IMPUNITY TO SMASH UP MY PROPERTY. Julie Fulton omits 60 minutes of 75 minutes of interrogation and claims it is "balanced, accurate and reiable".

MATERIAL EVIDENCE 4

In the weeks preceeding 25/03/22 we had been serving schools letters saying to Cease & Desist injecting schoolchildren with unknown substances. On 25/03/22 c. 14:50 after our Pushback at Fosse Park Leicester, we split up me to make my way to the house of a friend. I heard the noise of a siren and saw in the rear view mirror an unliveried police car and pulled left to let it pass. The car swerved in front of me with others surrounding me. I was told i was being stopped about having no insurance. There were by now 4 vehicles including two unliveried and c. 8 police men. They threatened my property real, corporeal and intangible. i was told i was being arrested for driving and then also being arrested for harassing schools. i was dragged out of car by the handcuffs and lifted in to a 6 vehicle of van--there was no an additional police motorcycle and 11 police men including 2 armed police men. i was refused paper and pencil. i was told that the visitors to the cell were not to be entered on to the custody record. i was interrogated for 75minutes--60 of which were about the schools. i was refused copies of the claims made by the employees of the schools. i was told i could not keep the PACE leaflet and was shouted at. During my incarceration the communication call button was deactivated and i could not make myself or my requests known. i was left in the middle of nowhere alone after being kept for 8 hours and had no idea where i was. I was told by PC Cole an hour before my release that i would be freed if i agreed to bail conditions of not contacting schools or sending letters re the injections - i explained that i was being told to ignore the harms of the injections and let the harm continue unchallenged which i could not do. Upon my daughter hearing i thought my hand was broken and seeing my injuries my daughter took me to the Leicester Royal Infirmary approximately 90 minutes after being left to find my way home. I was too swollen for it to be ascertained if my hand was broken. The 26/03/22 i received a voicemail from a police man saying that they understood i had been injured and to get in touch on a mobile number. I had told only my daughter and the nurse that the police had inflicted the injuries. The message could not be found when i went to play it to my daughter and have her take the details down. The police and CPS refuse to provide the evidence of all the body cam footage and the interrogation. i was refused paper and pencil ; And i was refused the custody record. When i was let go i said i wanted to keep the slim leaflet of PACE and the custody sergeant nigh on screamed at me that i could not. The administration at Leicester Royal Infirmary refuse to supply the SAR. i was told on the night/morning of the 26/03/22 i would need a further xray and exam after 14 days and would be contacted. LRI lost the records and claimed they knew nothing of this. Immediately after this i was told that Yeomans PC259 was claiming i had assaulted them Then matters were to be heard at the Magistrates court and i was told, by police, to attend. There has been no correspondence sent to me regarding this. i went to the Magistrates court and i was told it was unnecessary for me to attend as a Legal Advisor would decide based on papers before them. I can only presume these were police papers only as i had been unaware of this form of 'court'. Because i objected to this 'court' of 1 side, i was informed it was to be moved to be brought before a judge. I had still had no case file and the judge told Safina Desai of the CPS to get a copy of their papers to me ; And i was to have a browse before being brought back in. On that day the judge- Thomas shifted the matters up to the Crown Court. i saw for the first time the injuries Yeomans PC259 was claiming i had intentionally inflicted as he and numerous others were laying hands upon my property corporeal and real. All the while the Subject Access Requests are ignored. On 02.11.22 we went to court and upon discovering no list with our name the office said there was no hearing just the court deciding some issues. We pressed for the orders from the initial Crown Court hearing and were given the Pr Trial Presentation Hearing Judicial order paper and were told to go to the CPS office to submit our evidence. This evidence was a selection of the injuries photographs. The case manager refused to speak to me. The receptionist refused to accept the photographs 'on orders from her manager'. The CPS have provided no evidence. On 27.02.23 when going to Leicester Crown Court for c. the 4th such visit since 02.11.22, whilst helping a friend in the office, i was approached by 2 police men. They claimed i had given my details--i had not given my details i said and they left. They returned and used my name and said there was an arrest warrant out for me and after 6 police imprisoning me and taking my property i was taken to a police cell and then back to the Crown Court and then before Robert Alan Brown. i was told there had been a meeting on 19.01.23 which i had failed to attend and the CPS had put a warrant out. They further claimed i knew about the hearing - which i did not- and that i had not submitted papers on time. As i told them i have received no papers from the police or CPS and can not defend when there papers are withheld. RABrown called me a liar. RABrown without my consent said all papers were to be emailed to me. I did not consent voluntarily to this. No such method to submit papers to me has been used by the CPS. They did in fact write a 1-page letter contra RABrown's order. The CPS were not sanctioned for failing to present per the PTPHJO. i was then passed some poly pockets of documents and discovered the partial transcript from 25/03/22. On 27/03/22 we went to Leicester Crown Court to discover that there had been a court hearing 2-weeks earlier and per Steve Taylor of KCH Nottingham, he did not put out an arrest warrant that time with a bemused face for effect. [an arrest warrant for a hearing to which we were obivious]. They all decided that the 27th would not be the start of the 3-day trial [to which we were oblivious] and the listing said "re POSS PONE". It was at 11:48 Steve Taylor first approached us and said he wanted a quiet word with me. I had not identified myself to him but he somehow knew me just as the police somehow knew me on 27/03/23. It was then Steve Taylor said that in the meeting 14 days prior they had decided not to move ahead. When questioned Steve Taylor said i had assaulted Yeomans PC259 and still the case was not going ahead. Steve Taylor also said that Yeomans PC259 had not said he was arresting me for harassment [which i know he did early on and way before i was dragged from my car as i was trying to write things down but my hands were shaking so badly ]. Within Yeoman's statement he has again switched the mention of arrest for harassment around. The transcription was short and started 60 minutes in omitting all mention of the 16 claims of harassment received the police man claimed in the last days. The interrogator refused to let me look at the affidavit of claims, or have paper and pencil to write and keep and rebut.