You are on page 1of 5

Volume 9, Issue 4, April – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24APR399

Isolation of Amylolytic Lactic Acid Bacteria from


Cow, Goat and Sheep Milk in Yola Town,
Adamawa State, Nigeria
*Tyokusa, A. G. Danke, I. C.
Microbiology Department Microbiology Department
Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University Modibbo Adama University
(Formerly Federal University of Agriculture), (Formerly Federal University of Technology),
Makurdi, Nigeria. Yola, Nigeria

Corresponding Author: *Tyokusa, A. G.

Abstract:- In this study, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were Amylase producing lactic acid bacteria known as
isolated from fresh milk samples from cow, sheep, and amylolytic lactic acid bacteria (ALAB) secretes amylases,
goat using MRS agar as a growth medium. which make it easier to hydrolyze and ferment starch into
Lactobacillusplantarum, Lactobacillusacidophilus, lactic acid in a single step (Reddy etal., 2008).The
Lactobacillusfermentum, Enterococcusgallinarum, and manufacture of food additives like organic acids (like lactic
Enterococcusfaecium were the species of LAB that were acid) and enzymes (like alpha amylase) is done in the food
isolated and identified using the Vitek 2 compact system. processing industries using ALAB enzymes (Panda and
While Lactobacillus fermentum, Enterococcus faecium, Ray, 2016). The ALAB produce amylases, which are starch-
and Lactobacillus plantarum were isolated from goat modifying enzymes with a wider range of uses than
milk, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus gallinarum, chemical starch hydrolysis in the food processing sectors
and Lactobacillus plantarum were isolated from cow (Smerilli et al. 2015).Among these essential enzymes in the
milk.However, from sheep milk, only Lactobacillus realm of biotechnology is amylase.From a fungal base,
plantarum and Lactobacillus acidophilus were isolated. amylase appears to have been the first enzyme manufactured
All the isolates were subjected to amylase production test industrially in 1894.In the treatment of digestive diseases, it
using modified MRS media and the results showed that was utilized as a medicinal acid(Shanmugasundaram etal.,
Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillusacidophilus and 2015). According to Sachdev et al (2016), amylase is one of
Lactobacillusfermentum produced amylase while the leading enzymes used in industry from decade and that
Enterococcus gallinarum and Enterococcus faecium did microorganisms such as Bacillus species are the major
not produce amylase. source of production of amylase because of the ease of
availability, manipulation and operation.In contrast to
Keywords:- Milk, LAB, Vitek 2,Amylase and Modified MRS. chemical starch hydrolysis in the starch processing sector, a
wide range of commercially available microbial amylases
I. INRODUCTION now hold potential applications.Among other bacteria that
produce amylase, the most recently found ALAB strain
One of the most important types of bacteria in the food Lactobacillusparacasei B41 was the first amylolytic
industry are the lactic acid bacteria (LAB).People all over representative of the L. casei group(Bhanwar and Gangul,
the world have long consumed them in dairy products, and 2014).
the majority of them are categorized as "generally
recognized as safe" (GRAS) microorganisms because they Milk is theprimary source of nutrition for young
are non-pathogenic, appropriate for industrial and mammals (including breastfed human infants) before they
technological processes, tolerant of bile and acid, and are able to digest solid food (Van Winckel etal., 2011). The
capable of producing antimicrobial substances (Shehata et primary players in milk fermentation are lactic acid bacteria,
al., 2016).Pediococcus, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, which work with amylase and other produced enzymes to
Streptococcus, Leuconostoc, and other bacteria are among convert lactose to lactic acid. This increased acidity makes
the cocci and bacilli in the LAB group (Mazzoli et al., the growth conditions of microorganisms other than LAB
2014).Application areas for lactic acid bacteria (LAB) increasingly unfavourable (Fernandez et al., 2015).
include food, agriculture, and medicine (Bintsis,
2018).Furthermore, lactic acid bacteria produce a variety of Considering cattle, sheep and goats rearing as major
enzymes, including lipases, ureases, peptidases, amylases, occupationinAdamawa state of Nigeria, fresh milk is always
and proteases. in abundant supply. Therefore, isolating amylase producing
lactic acid bacteria from cow, sheep and goat milk in the
state will create an avenue for exploring and harnessing the
available resources within the state. Consequently, the aim

IJISRT24APR399 www.ijisrt.com 1018


Volume 9, Issue 4, April – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24APR399

of this research work was to isolate and identify the amylase Manganese sulphate-0.05 all g/L/, pH-6.5 at 250C) (TITAN
producing lactic acid bacteria from cow, goat and sheep BIOTECH LTD India) for 24 to 48 hours at room
milk from Yola, Adamawa state of Nigeria. temperature (30-370C). Pure isolates were obtained by sub-
culturing a representative sample of distinct colonies spotted
II. METHODOLOGY on MRS agar.The bacteria isolates were identified using the
Vitek 2 compact system (BIOMERIEUX, France) in
A. Sample Collection, Isolation and Identification of addition to the catalase test and microscopic identification.
Bacteria Isolates
Five samples of fresh cow, goat, and sheep milk each B. Detection of Amylase Activity
were collected in sterile containers, transported to the In order to detect amylase activity, the isolated lactic
laboratory, and left for a 24-hour fermentation period. In acid bacteria were grown on modified MRS media
total, fifteen samples were obtained.Serial dilutions were containing 0.5% peptone, 0.7% yeast extract, 0.2% NaCl,
made for all the samples and appropriate dilutions (10-5 to 2% starch, and 1.5% agar. Following a 24-48-hour
10-9) inoculated on MRS agar (Dextrose-20, Agar 12., incubation period at 37°C, Gram's iodine solution (iodine:
Proteose peptone-10, Beef extract-10, Yeast extract-5, 0.2%, KI: 0.4%, distilled water: 100 mL) was added and the
Sodium acetate-5, Ammonium citrate-2, Dipotassium results were monitored (Madhavet al., 2011).
phosphate-2, Tween 80-1, Magnesium sulphate-0.10 and

III. RESULTS

 Results of Bacteria Isolates from Cow, Goat and Sheep Milk

Table 1: Catalase Test and Microscopic Identification of the Isolates


S/N ISOLATE CODE CATALASE TEST GRAM REACTION SHAPE
1 C1 _ + Rods
2 C2 _ + Rods
3 C3 _ + Cocci
4 G1 _ + Rods
5 G2 _ + Rods
6 G3 _ + Cocci
7 S1 _ + Rods
8 S2 _ + Rods
KEY: C=Cow Milk Isolate, S= Sheep Milk Isolate, G= Goat Milk Isolate + = Positive, - = Negative

Table 2: Lactic Acid Bacteria Identified using the Vitek 2 Compact System from the Milk Samples
S/No Source Lactic Acid Bacteria
1 C1 Lactobacillus fermentum
2 C2 Lactobacillus plantarum
3 C3 Enterococcus gallinarum
4 G1 Lactobacillus plantarum
5 G2 Lactobacillus fermentum
6 G3 Enterococcus faecium
7 S1 Lactobacillus acidophilus
8 S2 Lactobacillus plantarum
KEY: C = Cow Milk, G = Goat Milk and S = Sheep Milk

IJISRT24APR399 www.ijisrt.com 1019


Volume 9, Issue 4, April – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24APR399

 Results of Lactic Acid Bacteria That Produce Amylase

Plate 1: Detection of Lactic Acid Bacteria's Amylase Activity on a Modified MRS Agar Plate

Table 3: Amylase Producing Lactic Acid Bacteria


S/N ISOLATE CODE ISOLATE NAME AMYLASE PRODUCTION
1 C1 Lactobacillus fermentum +
2 C2 Lactobacillus pantarum +
3 C3 Enterococcus gallinarum -
4 G1 Lactobacillus plantarum+
5 G2 Lactobacillus fermentum+
6 G3 Enterococcus faecium-
7 S1 Lactobacillus acidophilus+
8 S2 Lactobacillus plantarum+
KEY: C = isolate from cow milk, G = Isolate from goat milk. S = Isolate from sheep milk,
(+) = produce amylase and (-) = do not produce amylase

IV. DISCUSSION goat milk that are Gram positive. Raw cow milk wasused to
isolate and identify LAB genera, including Lactobacillus,
Based on this finding, the bacteria isolated were Gram Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Streptococcus, and
positive and catalase negative.Altogether,a total of six rods Bifidobacterium species(Fesseha etal., 2021). Similarly, the
and two cocci bacteria were isolated (Table 1).The Vitek 2 raw cow milk was also used to isolate the LAB
compact system was used to identify the bacteria isolates namely;Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc,
(Table 2).The isolates identified were Streptococcus, Lactococcus, and Pediococcus species
Lactobacillusfermentum, Lactobacillusplantarum, (Wassie and Wassie, 2016).Guessas and Kihal (2004), also
Lactobacillusacidophilus, Enterococcusgallinarum and isolated LAB namely Lactococcus sp,
Enterococcusfaecium.L. plantarum was found in all the Streptococcusthermophilus, Leuconostoc sp,
three milk samples while L. fermentum were found in goat Lactobacilluscurvatus, L. helviticus, L. plantarum,L. reuteri,
and sheep milk. L. acidophilus was however, found only in L. casei, L. brevis, L. bulgaricus, L. paracasei and L.
cow milk sample.Similarly, Enterococcusgallinarum was caidophilus from goat milk.
present in cow milk only while Enterococcusfaecium was
isolated only from goat milk.All the isolates are members of The Lactobacilli genera; Lactobacilli plantarum, L.
the lactic acid bacteria (LAB). This agrees with Agagunduz pentosus, L. delbrueckii, L. helveticus, and L. paracasei-
etal (2021), who reported that, a variety of live lactic acid associated with a fermented goat milk product from
bacteria species can be found in fermented dairy Tajikistan were isolated byCho et al, (2018).In contrast,
products.Tyokusa and Owuama (2023), also isolated lactic Lactobacillus plantarum YN.1.3, a lacticacidbacterium, was
acid bacteria(Enterococcusgallinarum and isolated by Yelnetty et al (2020), from goat milk.According
Enterococcusfaecium) and additional bacteria from cow and to Chen etal(2020), Hu sheep milk was used to isolate

IJISRT24APR399 www.ijisrt.com 1020


Volume 9, Issue 4, April – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24APR399

Lactococcuslactis, Leuconostoc lactis, and a 97-amino acid starch-binding domain (SDB) (Wang et al.,
Sphingomonas.Lactobacillusplantarum, Lactobacillus 2006). A 954 amino acid protein with an open reading frame
rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and of 2862 bp was found to be encoded by the whole nucleotide
Bacillusshackletonii are the four species of lactic acid sequence of the LactobacillusamylovorusamyA gene(Giraud
bacteria (LAB) that were isolated from sheep milk and and Cuny, 1997).
identified using physiological, biochemical, and 16S rRNA
sequencing study (Patil et al., 2019). V. CONCLUSION

All the Lactobacillus species isolated produced Fresh milk from cows, sheep, and goats obtained from
amylase while Enterococcus species did not produce Adamawa State, Nigeria, like any other place,is a good
amylase (Table 3).Amylolytic Lactobacillus species have source of amylase producing lactic acid bacteria such as
been isolated from milk and other sources. Lee et al (2006), Lactobacillusfermentum, Lactobacillusplantarum, and
isolated L. acidophilus and L. fermentum with high amylase Lactobacillusacidophilus. The importance of this enzyme in
activity from intestinal contents of pigs. Also, South African food and other industries cannot be over emphasized. It is
barley was used to isolate strains of Lactobacillus therefore important to harness the readily available milk in
plantarum that producedα-amylase (Hattingh et al., Adamawa state for the commercial production of the
2015).Likewise, from traditional fermented Dadih, Elida amylase enzyme.
etal (2022), isolated the lactic acid bacteria that produce
amylase: Lactobacillusparacasei subsp paracasei mL3, REFERENCES
Lactobacillusplantarum mH4, Lactococcuslactis subsp
lactis Mh6, Lactobacillusplantarum Mh8, and [1]. Agagunduz, D., Yilmaz, B., Sahin, T. O., Gunesliol,
Lactobacillusparacasei subsp paracasei Ml14. B. E., Ayten, S., Russo, P., Spano, G., Rocha, J. M.,
Barkiene, E. and Ozogul, F. (2021). Diary Lactic
The amylase activities of the lactic acid bacteria Acid Bacteria and Their Potential Function in
isolates,Lactobacillusfermentum, Lactobacillusplantarum Dietetics: The Food-Gut-Health Axis. Foods
and Lactobacillusacidophilus is shown on plate 1.Amylases 10(12):3099 doi:10.3390/foods10123099
are a class of enzymes that break down starch into simple [2]. Akinfemiwa, O., Zubair, M. and Muniraj, T. (2023).
sugars, and a wide range of species produced these proteins Amylase. In: StatPears publishing.
(Gomez-Villegas et al., 2021).Amylases' main function is to [3]. Bhanwar, S. and Ganguli, A. (2014). α-amylase and
hydrolysed the glycosidic bonds that hold starch molecules β-galactosidase production on potato starch waste by
together, converting complicated carbohydrates into simpler Lactococcuslactis subsp. lactis isolated from pickled
sugars. yam. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research73:
324–330.
Alpha, beta, and gamma amylases are the three [4]. Bintsis, T. (2018). Lactic acid bacteria: their
primary classes of amylases, and they all target different applicationsin foods. Journal ofBacteriology and
parts of the carbohydrate molecule(Akinfemiwa etal., Mycology 6(2:89-94 DOI:
2023).Thus, the degradation of the starch present in the 10.15406/jbmoa.2018.06.00182
medium resulting in the clear zones (the loss of blue colour [5]. Chen, T., Wang, L., Li, Q. et al (2020). Functional
of iodine-starch complex) around the colonyof each isolate probiotics of lactic acid bacteria from Hu sheep
as seen on plate 1is as a result of the amylases produced by milk. BMC Microbiology20, 228
the three LAB isolates.By analyzing the halo zone https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01920-6
surrounding the colonies, which had a diameter of 0.9 mm [6]. Cho, G. S., Cappello, C., Schrader, K., Fagbemigum,
and 1.23 mm, Padmavathi et al (2018), found that O., Oguntoyinbo, F. A., Csovcsics, C., Rösch, N.,
Lactobacillusfermentum and Lactobacillus species Kabisch, J., Neve, H., Bockelmann, W., Briviba, K.,
G3_4_1TO2, isolated from various materials such as milk, Modesto. M., Cilli, E., Mattarelli, P. and Franz, C.
curd, and bovine colostrum, produced amylase enzyme. M. A. P. (2018). Isolation and Characterization of
Lactic Acid Bacteria from Fermented Goat Milk in
Garcia-Cano et al (2020),identified endo and Tajikistan. Journal of Microbiology and
exoamylases as among the enzymes that break down starch. Biotechnology 28(11)
The inner section of amylose and amylopectin contains α- [7]. Elida, M., Agustina, A., Ermiati, E. and Desminarti,
1,4 glycosidic linkages that endoamylases cleave to release S. (2022). Isolate Characterization and Amylolytic
oligosaccharides and dextrin as α-anomeric derivatives.Like Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Traditional
glucoamylase or α-glucosidase, exoamylases can cleave the Fermented Dadih. IOP Conference Series: Earth
α-1,4 and α-1,6 bonds of the exterior glucose residues, and Environmental Science. Doi: 10.1088/1755-
releasing glucose as the end product. 1315/1097/1/012025
[8]. Fernandez, M., Hudson, J. A., Korpela, R. and de los
One important feature of LAB that contributes to the Reyes-Gavilan, C. G. (2015). Impact on Human
fermentation of starch into lactic acid is its amylolytic Health of Microorganisms Present in Fermented
activity.The primary cause of the amylolytic activity in Diary Products: An Overview. BioMed Research
ALAB is the alpha-amylase (amyA) genes. The amyA gene International doi: 10.1155/2015/412714
has 1746 base pairs, a 459-amino acid catalytic domain, and

IJISRT24APR399 www.ijisrt.com 1021


Volume 9, Issue 4, April – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24APR399

[9]. Fesseha, H., Taye, Y., Degu, T. and Mathewos, M. [21]. Reddy, G., Altaf, M., Naveena, B. J., Venkatteshwar,
(2021). Isolation and Identification of Lactic Acid M. and Kumar, E. V. (2008). Amylolytic bacteria
Bacteria from Cow Milk and Milk Products. The lactic acid fermentation-a review. Biotechnology
Scientific World Journal. Advances 26:22-33
[10]. Garcia-Cano, I., Rocha-Mendoza, D., Kosmerl, E., [22]. Sachdev, S., Ojha, S. and Mishra, S. (2016). Bacillus
Zhang, L. and Jimenez-Flores, R. (2020). Technically Spp. Amylase: Production, Isolation,
relevant enzymes and proteins produced by LAB Characterization and Its Application. International
suitable for industrial and biological activity. Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology.
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Doi.10.3126/ijasbt.v4i1.14574
doi.org/10.1007/s00253- 019-10322-2 [23]. Shanmugasundaram, S. Eswar, A., Mayavu, P.,
[11]. Giraud, E. and Cuny, G. (1997). Molecular Surya, M. and Anbarasu, R. (2015). Screening and
characterization of the alpha-amylase genes of Identification of Amylase Producing Bacteria from
Lactobacillusplantarum A6 and Lactobacillus Marakkanam Saltpan Environment, Tamil
amylovorus reveals an unusual 3’ end structure Nadu, India. Asian Journal of Biomedical and
with direct tandem repeats and suggests a common Phamarceutical Sciences
evolutionary origin. Gene. doi:10.1016/s0378- [24]. Shehata, M. G., El Sohaimy, S. A. El-Sahn, M. A.
1119(97)00309-0 and Youssef, M. M. (2016). Screening of isolated
[12]. Gomez-Villegas, P., Vigara, J., Romero,L., Gotor, potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria for cholesterol
C., Raposo, S., Goncalves, B. and Leon, R. (2021). lowering property and bile salt hydrolase activity.
Biochemical Characterization of the Amylase Annals of Agricultural Science. 6(1):65–75.
Activity from the New Haloarchaeal Strain [25]. Smerilli, M., Neureiter, M., Wurz, S., Haas, C.,
Haloarcula sp. HS Isolated from Odiel Marshlands. Fruhauf, S. and Fuchs, W. (2015). Direct
Biology 10(4):337 doi:10.3390/biology10040337 fermentation of potato starch and potato residues to
[13]. Guessas, B. and Kihal, M. (2004). Characterization lactic acid by Geobacillus stearothermophilus under
of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Algerian arid non-sterile conditions. Journal of Chemical
zone raw goat milk. African Journal of Technology and Biotechnology. 90(4) 648-657
Biotechnology 3(6). [26]. Tyokusa, A. G. and Owuama, C. I. (2023).
[14]. Hattingh, M., Alexander, A., Meijering, I., van Bacteriocins Production Potentials of Some Gram
Reenan, C. A. and Dicks, L. M. T. (2015). Positive Cocci Bacteria Isolated from Milk and
Amylolytic strains of Lactobacillusplantarum Other Food Sources. Current Trends on
isolated from barley. African Journal of Biotechnology and Microbiology 3(4)DOI:
Biotechnology 14(4). 10.32474/CTBM.2023.03.000172
[15]. Lee, H, S., Gilliland, S. E. and Carter, S. (2006). [27]. Van Winckel, M. Velde, S. V., De Bruyne, R. and
Amylolytic Cultures of Lactobacillusacidophilus: Biervliet, S. (2011). “Clinical Practice”. European
Potential Probiotics to Improve Dietary Starch Journal of Pediatrics 170(12): 1489-1494
Utilization. Journal of Food Science 66(2):338-344 doi:1007/s00431-011-1547
[16]. Madhav, K., Verma, S. and Tanta, R. (2011). [28]. Wang, N. Zhang, T., Wang, Q., Liu, J., Wang, H.,
Isolation of amylase producing Bacillus species from Xue, Y. and Ma, Y. (2006). Gene cloning and
soil sample of different regions in Dehradun and to characterization of a novel alpha-amylase from
check the effect of pH and Temperature on their alkaliphilic Alkalimonas amylolytica. Biotechnology
amylase activity. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Journal 1(11): 1256-65. Doi:10.1002/biot.200600098
Biomedical Sciences 12(12) [29]. Wassie, M. and Wassie, T. (2016). Isolation and
[17]. Mazzoli, R., Bosco, F., Mizrahi, I., Bayer, E. A. and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Raw Cow
Pessione, E. (2014). Towards lactic acid bacteria- Milk. International Journal of Advanced Research in
based biorefineries. Biotechnology Advances 32: Biological Sciences 3(8)
1216–1236. DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.005 [30]. Yelnetty, A. Purwadi, Ekawati, T. T. (2020).
[18]. Panda, S. H. and Ray, R. C. (2016). Amylolytic Indigenous Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from
Lactic Acid Bacteria, Microbiology and Food Spontaneously Fermented Goat Milk as Potential
Technological Interventions in Food Fermentation In Probiotics. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences
book: Fermented foods. Doi:10.1201/b19872-9 23(7):883-890
[19]. Padmavathi, T., Bhargari, R., Rao Priyanka, P.,
Niranjan, N. R. and Pavitra, P. V. (2018). Screening
of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria and
production of amylase and its partial purification.
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
16(2): 357-362 doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.03.005
[20]. Patil, A.,Disouza, J. and Pawar, S. (2019).Shelf-life
stability of encapsulated lactic acid bacteria isolated
from sheep milk thrived in different milk as natural
media. Small Ruminant Research vol 170:19-25

IJISRT24APR399 www.ijisrt.com 1022

You might also like