Sorry, but wrong.
--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.
On Jan 29, 7:49 pm, o.20.t...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
>Suppose I told you that we the majority don't give a flying >fuck about
> 3000 Darwin winners each month?
>
But they're NOT all Darwin Winners, you idiot. Many of the dead did
nothing wrong but were killed by a psycho speeder like you. Do you
consider those who died on 9/11 to be Darwin Winners? THINK
On Jan 29, 8:29�pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
Don't expect Bush to go around attacking bars and nightclubs. That's
probably where his kids are.
David
The way you have phrased your post, it sounds like you assume that there is
some kind of EXCLUSIVE choice to be made. That is: "Which do you want, bin
Laden captured, OR reducing US highway deaths."
If I want bin Laden captured it does not mean I don't give a hoot about
traffic deaths and don't want to "do anything about it."
The US highway slaughter is shameful, but you have applied a child's logic.
Grow up.
RO
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Pa...@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Opinions stated herein are the sole property of the author. Standard
disclaimers apply. All rights reserved. No user serviceable components
inside. Contents under pressure; do not incinerate. Always wear adequate
eye protection. Do not mold, findle or sputilate.
On Jan 29, 9:53 pm, "Ron O'Neal" <ron...@wt.net> wrote:
>The way you have phrased your post, it sounds like you assume that there >is
> some kind of EXCLUSIVE choice to be made. That is: "Which do you want, bin
> Laden captured, OR reducing US highway deaths."
>
I never said it was one or the other, you nitwit. But the point is the
reckless driver problem is MUCH larger and MUCH more solveable than
the problem of arab terrorism. And yet which is the publed concerned
with?
AMERICA = INFINITE STUPIDITY
>Well - that's what our highway terrorists, the speeders and drunk drivers
>and red light runners and other criminal drivers do.
Yeah. Whatever.
Re: I never said it was one or the other, you nitwit.
That is why I said "The way you have phrased your post, it sounds like you
assume that there is
some kind of EXCLUSIVE choice to be made."
The way you phrased your post.....Phrased....PHRASED.......
Lern to reed gud. Beanbag.
RO
On Jan 29, 10:38 pm, Jim Yanik
>A lot of the US "highway slaughter" is self-inflicted.
> (and NOT speed-related)
>
> Just drivers being clueless/negligent.
I know that. And for the idiots who kill themselves by their bad
driving, i say good riddance. But many drivers kill OTHER people and
that's what should concern you.
>
>
>On Jan 29, 9:53 pm, "Ron O'Neal" <ron...@wt.net> wrote:
>>The way you have phrased your post, it sounds like you assume that there >is
>> some kind of EXCLUSIVE choice to be made. That is: "Which do you want, bin
>> Laden captured, OR reducing US highway deaths."
>>
>
>I never said it was one or the other, you nitwit. But the point is the
>reckless driver problem is MUCH larger and MUCH more solveable
Wrong.
First of all, you're a total idiot. Speeding and DUI both are
misdemeanors, murder however, is a felony. You know this fact.
Therefore you know you are a liar and willingly, publicly LIE. You are
the murderer. You are helping to destroy our freedom by proclaiming
that speeders and drunk drivers are murderers. They are not. You,
however, are a complete waste of space.
You should realize how illegitimate and terroristic the current
judicial system is. What did this nation do for 200 years before MADD
cunts and DUI laws????How did we survive? You are stupid. There are
people drinking and driving everyday all around you and they don't
murder anyone. It's called freedom. Something you need to care more
about.
Freedom is what makes the world go around and keeps people happy and
balanced. You seem to want to infringe upon all of our freedom by
waging war on those exercising it. You need to focus on more pressing
issues that actually will have an affect on us all. I am against the
New World Order which so many of our leaders say we must and will
have. They are the ones condition you to accept they're system of
total control over your life.
I hate you, scumloving scumguzzler.
> killed every month by these psychos and yet nothing is done about it.
> These monsters get off with fines and
Dallas begins red-light camera fines today
By SALLY CLAUNCH
STAR-TELEGRAM STAFF WRITER
DALLAS - Starting today, red-light cameras will identify violators and
the Police Department will slap them with a $75 fine.
Police have issued warnings to about 1,305 red-light runners caught on
camera since the program began Dec. 8, officials said.
But the grace period is over. Owners of vehicles that run red lights
will receive fines of $75 for the first and second violations and $150
for a third violation within 12 months.
The tickets are civil offenses and do not affect vehicle owners'
insurance.
Dallas is not alone with its crackdown. Arlington plans to install
cameras at 10 of its most dangerous intersections by the end of
February. Other area cities using red-light cameras include Garland,
Plano, Richardson, Rowlett, Denton and Frisco.
Advocates of the plan say the cameras will make streets safer.
Opponents say the cameras are just a way for a city to increase its
revenue.
Texas ranks fourth in the nation in red-light fatalities, at 3.5 per
100,000 residents, according to the Federal Highway Administration.
The agency reported that from 1993 to 2003, 7,300 fatal crashes at
intersections were due to red-light running.
IN THE KNOW
Red-light cameras
Intersections in Dallas monitored by red-light cameras:
Abrams Road and Forest Lane
Fitzhugh Avenue and Gaston Avenue
Commerce Street and Central Expressway
Miller Road and Plano Road
Tyler Street and Jefferson Boulevard
Lemmon Avenue and Mockingbird Lane
Marsh Lane and Frankford Road
Beckley Avenue and Colorado Boulevard
Ferguson Road and Gus Thomasson Road
SOURCE: City of Dallas
IN THE KNOW
How red-light cameras work
Radar equipment monitors traffic. When the signal turns red, the
camera system is activated by any vehicle running a red light.
Two pictures are taken by the cameras. The first picture shows that
the front of the vehicle is not yet into the intersection while the
light has already turned red. The second picture shows the vehicle
continuing through the intersection and includes the license plate.
The camera records the date and time of the violation and the time
since the light turned red.
Those who enter the intersection before the light turned red and, for
whatever reason, are trapped in the intersection when the light
changes will not trigger the camera or receive a citation.
SOURCE: City of Dallas
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/16464075.htm
Fines? What do you suggest Gitmo, beheading? TORTURE? They're invading
our privacy and violating the due course of law and that's not enough
FOR YOU! Who the fuck are you and what is it that YOU DO? You speed.
You run stop signs and you run red lights...off with your head!!!
> the idiot american says "cool - the
> important thing is catching bin laden."
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't
care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 The New American, 4/8/02
>
> Which is it, you dumbfuck? First you wail on about 43 000 deaths a year
> (ref:http://tinyurl.com/2utsnx) and then you spew forth this 3000 a
> month nonsense. Newsflash, you kindergarten reject: 3000 deaths a month
> times 12 months per year equals 36 000 deaths a year, not 43 000, l
If you could read, you'd see that i said OVER 3000. Some friendly
advice. An insect should never argue with a god.
Twice, if you do one in Europe.
--
There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
result in a fully-depreciated one.