Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Although topic coverage and cognitive demand are key aspects of mathematics curriculum analysis, they are insufficient for recognizing the ways that such curricula present opportunities to support culturally responsive mathematics teaching (CRMT). Capturing elements of curriculum content or rigor and additional components of CRMT would help shed light on important differences in the design of such curricula. We analyze six popular standards-based grade six mathematics curricula along seven dimensions of CRMT along with established analyses of content coverage and performance expectations. Our results indicate that this sort of analysis can help describe meaningful differences in how these curricula approach the content, and can complicate narrower, traditional approaches to mathematics curriculum analysis.