VT Condemns the ETHNIC CLEANSING OF PALESTINIANS by USA/Israel

 $ 280 BILLION US TAXPAYER DOLLARS INVESTED since 1948 in US/Israeli Ethnic Cleansing and Occupation Operation; $ 150B direct "aid" and $ 130B in "Offense" contracts
Source: Embassy of Israel, Washington, D.C. and US Department of State.

…by Jonas E. Alexis, VT Editor

In his book Porn Generation, Ben Shapiro condemns Hollywood for selling sex to young and naïve teenagers. He writes: “Hollywood has embraced the graphic elements of pornography, [and] the moral relativism behind these themes has become an implicit message in nearly every major mass-market films. For films targeted at youth, these messages are often explicit.”[1]

Shapiro’s support for Pussy Riot, a Trotskyite group that eventually produced pornography at the Moscow Zoological Museum,[2] raises intriguing questions. Why would Shapiro suggest that the Pussy Riot was acting in line with the principles of democracy and freedom? And why would he wholeheartedly endorse the band’s explicit actions in a sacred place like a cathedral? From the perspective of the “Right” vs. “Left” political spectrum in America, Shapiro’s position appears intellectually inexplicable, as he identifies as a conservative. To grasp the underlying metaphysical issues, one must look beyond mere political categories.[3]

Let us briefly acknowledge that Shapiro, following in the footsteps of his intellectual predecessor Irving Kristol, continues to engage with the Jewish revolutionary spirit. To comprehensively grasp this spirit, we must briefly discuss the subversive ideology embraced by the Pussy Riot.

The Moscow-based newspaper, The eXile, which its co-editor John Dolan humorously noted was “conceived in sin,” reported that members of the group engaged in an act they named ‘Fuck For Medvedev!’ They literally “stripped off their clothes and engaged in sexual activity in the middle of Moscow’s Biology Museum. This act was carried out for approximately 10 minutes, with photographers present, before they were ejected from the premises.”[4]



Some members of Pussy Riot were previously affiliated with a group known as “Voina,” which translates to “war” in Russian. Voina gained notoriety for a daring act that involved “painting a 60-meter penis on St. Petersburg’s Liteiny Bridge, just in time for it to be raised, mockingly dominating the skyline above the town’s FSB (ex-KGB) headquarters. This audacious piece, titled ‘Dick Captured By the SFB,’ remained elevated for several hours.”[5]

Voina has earned the moniker “Russia’s art terrorists” as dubbed by The Guardian, and other mainstream sources have acclaimed it as “the most renowned political artist group in Russia.”[6] This group was co-founded by two Jewish revolutionaries, Oleg Vasilyev and his wife Natalia Sokol. Voina humorously labeled their pornographic act in the Biological Museum as the “Pre-Election Orgie in Biological Museum.”[7] As The Guardian indirectly suggested, Voina drew its ideological inspiration from the Bolshevik Revolution.[8]

It was almost inevitable that they would resort to promoting literal anarchy to achieve their objectives. In fact, Sokol actively promoted, produced, and participated in works with titles like “Cock in the Ass,” “Leo the Fucknut is Our President!,” “Dick Captured by KGB,” and more.[9]

When posed with the question “What does Pussy Riot hope to achieve?” at the age of only twenty-three, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova responded,

“A revolution in Russia… I want to dismantle what I perceive as the most significant evils. I’m accomplishing this by putting my beliefs in freedom and feminism into action… I have deep affection for Russia, but I hold strong disdain for Putin.”24

Tolokonnikova, who pursued the study of philosophy at Moscow State University, couldn’t simply eradicate the notion of subversive revolution from her thoughts.

It becomes evident that Tolokonnikova’s antipathy toward Putin is rooted in his staunch backing of the Orthodox Church. According to her, the Russian Orthodox Church “enslaves women,” and Putin’s “sovereign democracy” ideology aligns with the same direction. Both reject Western values, including feminism.[10]

Tolokonnikova went so far as to derogatively refer to the church’s patriarchs as “bitches,” a common trait among revolutionaries. (Christopher Hitchens displayed a similar lack of sympathy when he referred to Mother Teresa as a “bitch.”[11]) However, Tolokonnikova appeared to contradict herself when she stated that her video performance was “hardly the kind of thing to hurt religious feelings.”[12] As Putin humorously remarked, one can’t help but wonder about the consequences if she and the band had staged a similar performance in a synagogue in Israel or any Western country.

What we are suggesting here is that for Ben Shapiro to use the concept of “moral purpose” in his book The Right Side of History: How Reason and Moral Purpose Made the West Great may be mere window dressing. In Shapiro’s perspective, the actions of the Pussy Riot appeared to align with the promotion of democracy and freedom. According to Shapiro, anyone who supported the Pussy Riot was right:

“No matter what your religious belief system, no matter how you feel about blasphemy in a church, there’s no excuse for jailing political dissidents for exercising the right to free speech…. Putin is a macho emblem of brusque disregard for human rights.”[13]

So much for Jewish Neoconservatism. Ben Shapiro is often perceived as a figure who aligns with conservative ideas, supporting them when they align with his political views. However, on matters concerning Israel, perpetual wars in the Middle East, and, as we’ve observed, Vladimir Putin, Shapiro tends to staunchly defend what some see as his essentially Talmudic ideology. A notable example is the recent Israel/Hamas conflict, where Candace Owens, a former guest on Shapiro’s show, asserted, ‘No government anywhere has a right to commit genocide.’ Shapiro interpreted this as a reference to Israel, promptly labeling her ‘disgraceful’ and urging her to resign from The Daily Wire.[14]

Shapiro once referred to the late Rachel Corrie as one of the “Great idiots in history.” Even years later, he maintained the view that Corrie “was a fool” and suggested that she “was acting on behalf of nefarious interests,” specifically the “terrorists” in Palestine. In contrast, individuals like Alex Jones, despite his controversial views, faced legal action for asserting that Sandy Hook was a hoax. This highlights a perceived discrepancy where figures like Shapiro can make disgusting statements without facing similar consequences.

Shapiro: “I am getting really sick of people who whine about ‘civilian casualties’… when I see in the newspapers that civilians in Afghanistan or the West Bank were killed by American or Israeli troops, I don’t really care… One American soldier is worth far more than an Afghan civilian.”

No matter how you slice it, Shapiro is an agent for Israel.

First published on February 7, 2024.

[1] Ben Shapiro, Porn Generation: How Social Liberalism Is Corrupting Our Future (Washington: Regnery Publishing, 2005), kindle edition.

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoj4IfiaNuQ.

[3] For a serious historical study on this, see E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008).

[4] http://www.exile.ru/blog/detail.php?BLOG_ID=17377&AUTHOR_ID.

[5] Nick Sturdee, “Don’t Raise the Bridge: Voina, Russia’s Art Terrorists,” Guardian, April 12, 2011.

[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalia_Sokol.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Nick Sturdee, “Don’t Raise the Bridge: Voina, Russia’s Art Terrorists,” Guardian, April 12, 2011.

[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalia_Sokol.

[10]  “Interview with Pussy Riot Leader: ‘I Love Russia, But I Hate Putin,’” Spiegel International, September 3, 2013.

[11] See for example Alister McGrath, Why God Won’t Go Away (London: SPCK, 2011), 25, 96.

[12] “Interview with Pussy Riot Leader: ‘I Love Russia, But I Hate Putin,’” Spiegel International, September 3, 2013.

[13] Ben Shapiro, “Will Hollywood Riot for Pussy Riot?,” FrontPage Magazine, August 20, 2012.

[14] “Far Right Media Clash: The Ben Shapiro And Candace Owens Blowup Explained,” Forbes, November 20, 2022.



ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

7 COMMENTS

  1. Shapiro a condenscending professional asshole that has always the “last word” on every subject.

    I could destroy him in a thirty second “debate” and I am an idiot.

    Ask him in debate who was responsible for blowing up the twin towers and building 7 then follow by asking him to provide some proof to back up his answer.

    He cannot have any evidence or proof at all, as there is none (only worn out lies)

    • Why so aggressive? Shapiro does not belong to those child-abusers, equality-bolshevics, climate-god-suckers or Arab-boot-lickers.

  2. Ben Shapiro….. I would only say one thing about him and that must people in YT refers to him as Elma Fudd, a clown.

  3. I always wondered about Pussy Riot. That one video in the Church was intended to be as offensive as possible. Punks wouldn’t bother self trashing themselves for an institution they don’t relate to, meaning organised religion. For that PIL’s ‘Your Religion’ is more to the point of a skewer than the hooded women and their protest, hooded, another punk no-no, hiding behind masks musically is for poseurs. I read a book written about them and it was so lame I struggled to find what their reason was and the excuses were so lame that their eventual court appearance was an anti climax. Unless a diversion. But there was no follow up musically. Nor did they write any either. They seemed to have been wound up let run, cop the flack and ha ha no one cared. This article though is revealing and good research. Their statement, ‘love Russia hate Putin’ is another gnomic fail. Punk et.al is about life not dressed up mannequin politicians. After all as the Sex Pistols put it: The Queen she ain’t no human being.

  4. It’s not that hard to figure Benny out. But having to read his book to write about him that is really hard.

    He’s as fake a conservative as a $3 bill. Jews can’t ever be conservatives that’s why they use the neo prefix. I could go even further and say Jews with a strong Jewish id can’t ever be real Americans. Jesus made it clear in a parable that you can’t serve two masters and this is no different. I don’t even have to bother backing this argument up, Johnathan Pollard did that for me, he said the quiet part aloud and nobody batted an eye. Nothing new either, just a bit stronger than what Theodore Herzl said over a century ago, that is “Jews should have no loyalty to the host country” to “if you can’t betray your host country we have no use for you” from a “repatriated” Jonathan Pollard born in the USofA.

  5. I am again on the side of Shapiro. Shapiro is not an agent for Israel, but for the US, which is worse for non-US-citizens. In several debates Shapiro considered, what of religious rules is today still appropriate & which is not, concerning actual moral standards. And Shapiro doeas not question the constitution. I suggest, Shapiro does not like the political system in Russia, not considering that a soft Russian president will be soon a dead president. Putin would be not the first white or red tsar dying in a revolt. And why should the Russians allow a split of Russia? The Union-president Lincoln did not allow the secession of the US. The conservative aspect about Israel is the status of an ethnocracy. The jehova-worshippers did not allow the Germans an ethnocracy and unleashed beside other warmongers 2 worldwars. This is a contradiction. China & Japan are ethnocracies, too. Even in the US Wasps, Wips, Blacks, Indigenes, Latinos, jehova-worschippers should have the right to set up ethnocracies on the territory of the US. That Shapiro is not regardful against muslims is reasonable. The majority of muslims worldwide are medinean muslims and not meccanean as Dr. Barrett. I do not accept abrahamitic religions politically, they are insult against the human spirit. So religions have to stay secular in societies, faith must remain a private matter. The sharia is never to accept. So, I deny the moral approach of Mr. Alexis in the article. But a church can forbid to enter the building, which has every banned person to accept, even Pussy Riot.

  6. Alex Jones is a clown. Ben Shapiro can always do midget porn, the Republican Party is dead and dying thanks to their support for Israel, they’re all traitors no more loyal than Jonathan Pollard was greeted as a hero by Benjamin Netanyahu. The far left have always been in power thanks to the idiots on the right are loyal to Israel, religious zealots, the Republican Party is the Bible Belt, Zionist to the extreme, loyal to Israel. None of it has ever benefited so-called conservatives, including everything as a result of the planned preventable attack on 9/11/2001, the phony war on terror is being fought to create greater Israel, and to eliminate any opposition.

Comments are closed.