St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Columns

Are ID chips too invasive?

An FDA-approved chip implant raises Big Brother concerns.

By IVAN PENN, The Consumer's Edge
Published July 28, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT
photo
[Special to the Times]
Delray Beach's VeriChip offers a device the size of a grain of rice to allow access to a patient's medical history when implanted in the arm. About 400 Americans have chips.

It appears that the effort to implant microchips into humans is not only alive and well but moving ever closer to getting under everyone's skin.

Delray Beach firm VeriChip, the nation's only FDA-approved company allowed to produce microchips for injection into people, got a boost recently from the American Medical Association.

The AMA said such devices "may help to identify patients, thereby improving the safety and efficiency of patient care." But the council warned that the devices' safety and security are unclear.

That was enough to create a stir in the technology and medical worlds as well as among privacy and religious folks. And enough to put a smile on VeriChip's face.

Scott Silverman, chief executive officer of VeriChip, says the primary aim is to help high-risk medical patients such as those with diabetes, Alzheimer's, cancer and heart conditions.

The chip, implanted in the upper right arm, allows medical personnel to access a patient's medical history in the event the person is unconscious or otherwise unresponsive. The person's data is stored in VeriChip's database.

Sounds a little spooky, and makes George Orwell seem more like a prophet than a novelist.

Silverman says it could save lives, "it's fairly safe and there have been no side effects." VeriChip's sister corporation, Digital Angel Corp., has been implanting chips in pets for 15 years.

"It should be first and foremost voluntary," Silverman says. "No one should ever be forced to get an implantable microchip."

But Katherine Albrecht, a co-author of the book Spychips, whom I'm sure drives Silverman crazy, argues that VeriChip is taking us down a treacherous road.

"You can feel the writing on the wall that this is the direction our society is moving," said Albrecht, who received her doctorate in education from Harvard, specializing in adult development and consumer education.

The chip uses technology called a Radio Frequency Identification tag.

Albrecht points out that the RFID technology used in the chips is becoming increasingly pervasive throughout our society as merchants use it to track inventory and purchases.

"If everybody had a chip in them ... we would be blissfully unaware of Big Brother," Albrecht said.

She says the program is flawed because if there are problems accessing VeriChip's database, the chip will prove useless. And, she says, as the AMA pointed out, there are questions about patient security.

And the religious have concerns of biblical proportions: tagging people with such devices reads like a precursor to the "mark of the beast."

Silverman says his company's focus is on medical patients. And the chip they use is "passive" or, simply stated, it does not emit a strong signal. To read the chip, medical personnel must use a scanner and be within 12 inches.

And he says the data is stored in a facility as secure as any of the best. He does admit once you have a chip, it could be used for other "applications." You can tie financial accounts to them and other data.

He points out a year ago one company injected two employees with chips for security reasons. In addition, nightclubs in Barcelona, Spain, Rotterdam, Holland, and Edinburgh, Scotland, use them so patrons can access VIP lounges and make purchases.

A bit much for me. The only chip I want in my body is a potato chip, maybe a tortilla chip. Definitely not a microchip.

The Consumer's Edge is a twice-monthly column to help consumers in the marketplace. Ivan Penn can be reached at or (727) 892-2332.

FAST FACTS

  • The chips are inserted in the upper right arm with a a hypodermic-type needle. The cost of the procedure: $200.
  • VeriChip uses a patented process, called bio-bind, to secure the chip to muscle tissue and prevent migration.
  • Medical personnel wave a scanner within 12 inches of the chip. A 16-digit identification appears to identify the person.
  • VeriChip maintains the patient's records in its database. Customers pay an annual fee, from $20 to $80, to keep a medical file.
HERE'S THE EDGE:
The American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs recommended that radio frequency identification (RFID) devices can be used to help identify patients, improve patient care and secure access to patient clinical information. But the AMA cautioned that the "efficacy and security" of the devices has not been established. As precautions, the AMA said, physicians implanting such devices should:
  • Disclose the medical uncertainties of RFIDs to patients as part of the informed consent process.
  • Strive to protect patients' privacy by storing confidential information only on RFID devices with informational security similar to that required of medical records.
  • Support research into safe, effective and potential nonmedical uses of RFID devices in people.

VeriChip Corp.
CEO: Scott Silverman
Annual revenue: $30-million
Products: Includes anklets for newborns as part of an infant anti-abduction system used in hospitals; and the VeriMed implantable chip.
Sister company: Digital Angel Corp., which produces implantable chips for pets and livestock. The company has annual revenues of $60-million.

[Last modified August 25, 2007, 01:46:16]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by noel 03/10/08 03:56 AM
the end time is near repent and turn back to GOD his word will be fullfilled whatever may happen
by sam 03/06/08 07:57 AM
i dnt believe in this stupidness... i'm scared the rapture is near... people say NO to this chip... these people who envented this chips is crazy satan is crontolling their minds... i wish God destroys this chips...
by stacy 02/13/08 08:12 PM
NEVER! NEVER! NEVER! Will I get this piece of trash
by eddy 01/25/08 02:20 PM
is this really the end of times. the chip is nothing but the mark of the beast
by Mike P 01/22/08 11:27 AM
You end times folks are nuts, its a choice knuckleheads, you choose to have this put in or taken out.Want to talk about numbers?you alredy have one,your ss # hows that you alrdy have the mrk of the beast nutjobs.And what the heck does Bush do with it
by Cindy 12/13/07 12:46 PM
If Penny's father-in-law wants a chip, let him have it. If the child molesters or other criminals want a chip, let 'em have it. Invading someone's "temple" is not in accordance with the Creator. I choose to keep my temple clean.
by Penny 11/14/07 08:58 AM
I think the chip implants are a good idea. My father-in law sufferd from Alzehimers and would wonder off. And what about all those criminals (child molesters) they need to be tracked at all times!
by donna 10/20/07 03:10 PM
10 ,20 07, why would any one want to put things in there body. who knows what sideafect this will case later. then if i did know
by Drew 09/04/07 10:41 AM
frances, I don't see anywhere in this article that Bush is pushing for this. I hope you are not a "Blame Bush because I had a bad day" type of person. If you have information from another source, then please share it. Id chips, bad idea.
by frances 09/03/07 10:36 PM
why would bush push for it anyways isnt he into that religous stuff? and if they did push for it people would stand outside the buildings and protest to the people that are getting it no matter what! kinda like the scene from X-Men:the last stand.
by Kwame 08/31/07 04:20 PM
It is a plan to institute a world government. People will lose their privacy. In times of war, nobody will be safe. It is similar to raising human beings to harvest their organs to save the rich. The intent is evil, because it has a hidden agenda.No
by Kwame 08/31/07 04:04 PM
I do not subscribe to such an idea. The intent may be good, but the risk staggers our imagination. Governments and individual institutions may use it to the detriment of the entire population. People stand the risk of being scanned in their bathrooms
by ACE 08/30/07 10:03 AM
This is definitely the end-time Mark of the Beast, besides being the biggest invasion of privacy. DO NOT ACCEPT IT!!!
by Lynda 08/30/07 01:42 AM
I remember reading when the VeriChip was first introduced, that the company's biggest concern was the "polymer coating" that "too well integrated with human tissue". Now that has been described as a "bio-bind to prevent migration". How convenient.
by Shirley 08/30/07 12:27 AM
I am a Law Obeying, Tax Paying Citizen, I don't need to be TRACKED for ANY reason, Not even Medical, When it's my time to go, I'm Ready!
by Becca 08/20/07 12:14 AM
There is already way too much invasion into my privacy by the government, financial & medical communities. This is so far over the top as to be almost laughable. Unfortunately, we can't laugh - we must be diligent & continue to fight for our privacy
by Julian 08/12/07 01:44 AM
This is a verry subtle way of conditionong Humanty for the New World Order, Sounds Crazy dose it not, If you find this hard to belive do your research and you will see this is not something to take lightely. (ACTS 2:38)
by Mitch 08/12/07 01:26 AM
mark of the beast is gonna happen wheter me like it or not...... just DONT TAKE IT!!!! you will be beheaded believe me
by Wm Mills 08/10/07 10:34 PM
By Bill The "Chip" is designed to monitor and control every human on earth which must become a reality for end-time conditions. It has become a reality and needs only to become acceptable by the majority of the population. DO NOT ACCEPT IT!!!
by Andrea 08/10/07 10:35 AM
We need to keep our new generation of children ( young babies of today ) informed of the "FACTS-FROM OUR HOLY BIBLE" concerning this issue. Otherwise the NEW generation will EMBRASE this technology without a thought.
by Margo 08/10/07 12:00 AM
That is to close to the mark of the beast. They can keep there chips.
by Donna 08/09/07 10:14 PM
There goes more of your privacy rights. Remember the cameras that started out in banks, then parking lots, now on intersection lights and some places have them on every street corner. NO TO THE CHIP IN THE ARM; I don't believe in them or trust them.
by mike 08/09/07 06:30 PM
This company can take their chip and shove it where the sun doesn't shine,this is chip is just the start of it all,and I don't intend to go to hell for something that will guarntee afront row seat in hell!It is an excuse for nothing good!!!!!!!!!
by Carol 08/09/07 06:11 PM
Using a chip to plead "security" is pure evil. No one needs to be chipped. As the scientists who created the atom bomb knew, there invention could be used for evil, and it was. Man will always be tempted to use technology for evil. It's bad.
by kay 08/08/07 12:16 AM
Icant believe that this company dosent know the role they are playing in getting the mark of the beast well on its way.Everyone that's born again christians knows thats it's just a matter time before christ comes back for his church.
by Chris 08/07/07 04:10 PM
This is unacceptable technology period!That polar shift better get here soon or we are all done.
by Tommy 08/06/07 08:45 PM
While this is not the Mark of the Beast,it certainly is headed that way,and fast.It is not the U.S.that will issue the M.O.B.,but they seem to have a hand in getting it under way. Aside from that,is anyone willing to sacrifice privacy for technology?
by mark 08/06/07 06:38 PM
well it is here and we may voice it but we know the out come the bible tells us so those who are born again
by Ginger 08/06/07 02:21 PM
I would cut it out of my arm myself if it were forced on me.
by Debra 07/30/07 09:02 AM
I agree with Scott 7/28/07. This is too close to the Mark of the Beast. Anyone can get your ID that way too. So much for privacy!
by Steve 07/29/07 12:53 AM
I suggest that everyone at VeriChip get one of these implants. Upper right arm or perhaps some other part of their anatomy.
by voxpopuli 07/28/07 06:59 PM
here it comes. I wondered when bush would try to push it through. AMA and FDA two sources we no longer trust. Good points all. This is an outrage. DNA is so common now that they can plant ANYONE at the scene of any crime. step out of line man come
by Sara 07/28/07 05:29 PM
The same goal can be accomplished by a patient wearing some kind of wristband or necklace alerting medical personnel to their condition...
by Scott 07/28/07 12:10 PM
Mark of the Beast? 666?
by Tom 07/28/07 09:19 AM
I am not surprised by the AMA endorsement as those bozos even endorse adding fluoride to the drinking water which hardens more than just the teeth - it hardens the pineal and other endocrine glands. Say NO to chipping human beings. Shame on the AMA.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT