Scheme WG2 Yellow Edition ballot (Responses)

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	P	Q	R	S
1	Timestamp	0. What is your name?	1. [non-portable macro system] Should R7RS provide R6RS syntax-case?	2. [non-portable macro system] Should R7RS provide explicit renaming?	Joint ER/syncase vote	3. [non-portable macro system] Should R7RS provide the R6RS identifier-syntax macro transformer?	4. [non-portable macro feature] Should R7RS provide syntax parameters (hygiene bending)?	5. [non-portable macro feature] Should R7RS provide R6RS-style splicing versions of let-syntax and letrec-syntax?	6. [non-portable macro feature] Should R7RS provide identifier aliasing?	7. [non-portable macro feature] Should R7RS allow arbitrary properties to be attached to an identifier?	8. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide a generalization of cond to allow different kinds of falsy value or multiple values?	9. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide syntax for binding a single multiple-valued expression to local variables?	10. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide syntax for binding a local variable to its body for recursive use?	11. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide syntax for specializing parameters?	12. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide named let with rest arguments?	13. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide syntax (not lexical syntax) for infix notation?	15. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS provide a library of macros and procedures for handling multiple values?	14. [portable syntax-rules] Should R7RS allow definitions like (define ((foo a b) d e f), where foo accepts arguments a and b and returns a procedure that accepts arguments d, e, and f?

2	10/15/2021 21:54:38	Vladimir Nikishkin	Yes	Yes		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	SRFI 212	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	SRFI 5	SRFI 156	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
3	10/15/2021 22:04:44	Arthur A. Gleckler	No vote	No vote		No	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	No vote	SRFI 213	No	No	No	No	No	No	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
4	10/16/2021 2:52:16	Daphne Preston-Kendal	Yes	No, unless question 1 on R6RS syntax-case is answered ‘no’. (This is a conditional vote.) Further, if this passes and syntax-case does not, I would appreciate an additional question on a future ballot on whether to adopt the SRFI 211 form of explicit renaming.		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	No vote	SRFI 213	No vote	No	SRFI 31	No vote	No	No vote	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
5	10/16/2021 4:41:24	Roy Mu aka NalaGinrut	Yes	Yes		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	No	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	SRFI 5	SRFI 156	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
6	10/16/2021 10:17:18	Taylan Kammer	Yes	No		No vote	No vote	SRFI 188	No vote	No vote	No vote	No	No vote	No vote	No	No	No	No	data lost
7	10/17/2021 7:14:30	Martin Rodgers	No	No		No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	data lost
8	10/18/2021 7:45:47	Emmanuel Medernach	Yes	No		No	No	No	No	No	No	SRFI 8	No	No	No	No	No	No	data lost
9	10/19/2021 16:03:33	Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe	Yes	No		Yes	No vote	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	No	SRFI 61	No	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	No	No	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
10	10/19/2021 16:29:43	Justin Ethier	No	Yes		No	No	No	No	No	No	SRFI 8	No	No	No	No	No	No	data lost
11	10/19/2021 17:31:06	Sam Phillips	Yes	No		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	SRFI 219	data lost
12	10/19/2021 17:49:09	Dr. Nicholas Carlson	Yes	Yes		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	SRFI 5	SRFI 156	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
13	10/19/2021 20:30:59	Lulu (formerly erkin)	No vote	No vote		No vote	SRFI 139	No vote	SRFI 212	No vote	SRFI 61	Reusing an SRFI is always a good idea but maybe we should consider more flexible destructuring macros than `receive'.	No	SRFI 26	SRFI 5	No	No vote	SRFI 219	data lost
14	10/19/2021 23:41:47	Mark Hughes	Yes	Yes		Yes	No vote	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	No	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	No vote	No vote	No vote	No	No vote	No	data lost
15	10/20/2021 0:16:47	Graham Watt (gwatt)	Yes	No vote		Yes	No vote	No vote	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	No vote	No vote	SRFI 31	No vote	No	No vote	No vote	SRFI 219	data lost
16	10/20/2021 5:03:19	Ross Angle	No vote	Yes		No vote	Yes, but not as a go-to technique for anaphors. Syntax parameters make it easy to build abstractions that automatically have all the anaphoric binidings of the syntaxes they use, but even for this use case, letting internal details leak through implicitly can lead to surprises. Macros that bind syntax parameters are hard to use as implementation details of macros that don't, giving them limited usefulness. Better approaches to anaphoric bindings exist, including the approaches explored in the first part of "Keeping it Clean with Syntax Parameters" before syntax parameters are introduced.	No vote	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	No vote	No vote	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	No	SRFI 156	No	No vote	data lost
17	10/20/2021 11:31:15	Artem Chernyak	Yes	No vote		No vote	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	SRFI 5	No	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
18	10/25/2021 20:00:26	Gabriel B. Sant'Anna	Yes	No		No	SRFI 139	No vote	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	No vote	No	No	No	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
19	10/27/2021 12:18:33	Linas Vepstas	No vote	No vote		No vote	No vote	No vote	I like srfi-212 but have no desire to force it's implementation	No vote	No vote	No vote	I like srfi-31 but have no desire to force its implementation	No vote	I like srfi-5 but have no desire to force it's implementation	No vote	No vote	No vote	data lost
20	11/12/2021 15:50:03	Dmitry Moskowski (corpix)	Yes	Yes		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	No	No	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
21	11/12/2021 18:08:17	Tim Van den Langenbergh	Yes	No vote		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	No	No vote	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
22	11/13/2021 0:12:37	Vijay Marupudi	Yes	No vote		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	No vote	SRFI 156	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
23	11/13/2021 2:53:18	Jeremy Steward	Yes	Yes		No	No	No vote	No vote	No	No	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	No vote	No	No vote	No vote	data lost
24	11/14/2021 7:14:09	Martin Rodgers	Only as a SRFI.	Only as a SRFI.		No vote	Only as a SRFI.	Only as a SRFI.	No vote	Only as a SRFI.	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	Only as a SRFI.	No vote	Only as a SRFI.	Only as a SRFI.	SRFI 219	data lost
25	11/14/2021 16:24:21	Chris Vine	Yes	I would like to see both explicit renaming macros and implicit renaming macros: please treat this as a vote for explicit renaming and also a request for implicit renaming - see Chicken scheme for an implementation.		Yes	SRFI 139	No vote	No vote	No	No vote	No vote	No vote	No	No vote	No vote	No vote	SRFI 219	data lost
26	11/15/2021 12:43:01	Jani Juhani Sinervo	Yes	Yes		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	SRFI 5	No	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
27	11/23/2021 10:38:23	Duy Nguyen	No vote	Yes		No vote	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	No vote	SRFI 26 but but with <> replaced by _ to be consistent with syntax-rules and SRFI 156	SRFI 5	SRFI 156	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
28	11/26/2021 11:06:30	Takashi Kato	Yes	Doesn't have to provide two low level hygiene macros, so iff there's no syntax-case		Yes	No vote	No	No	No	SRFI 61	No	No	No	No	No	No	SRFI 219	data lost
29	12/3/2021 17:21:29	John Cowan	Yes	Yes		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	No	SRFI 156	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
30	12/3/2021 19:09:44	Ondřej Majerech	Yes to low level forms like syntax, syntax->datum, datum->syntax, no to syntax-case itself.	No		Yes	SRFI 139	No vote	SRFI 212	No vote	No vote	No	No	SRFI 197: chain-lambda instead of cut, plus all the other stuff from 197	No	No	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
31	1/18/2022 15:16:47	Vincent Manis	Yes	No		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	No vote	No vote	No	No vote	No	SRFI 5	No	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
32	1/31/2022 3:33:03	Alex Shinn	No vote	Yes		No vote	No vote	SRFI 188	No vote	No	No vote	SRFI 8	No vote	No vote	SRFI 5	No vote	No vote	No vote	data lost
33	2/1/2022 11:50:23	Marc-André Bélanger	Yes	No vote		Yes	SRFI 139	No vote	No vote	No vote	SRFI 61	No vote	No vote	cut is perfect as it is	No	No	No	No	data lost
34	2/1/2022 11:54:10	vyzo	No	No		Yes	racket-style syntax-parameterize	No	anything that provides a define-alias facility	No	No	anything that can capture works	sure why not, a rec macro is easy to write	yes	No	No	No	sure why not	data lost
35	2/1/2022 15:31:32	Jaime Fournier	No	No		No	No	No	No	No	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	SRFI 5	No	No	No	data lost
36	2/3/2022 14:44:53	Amirouche B.	Yes	No		No vote	No vote	No vote	No vote	No vote	No	No	No vote	No vote	No vote	No	No	No	data lost
37	2/4/2022 3:58:49	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen [My Preferences]	Yes	No		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	No vote	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	No	No	No	SRFI 210	No vote	data lost
38	2/9/2022 1:14:34	Shiro Kawai	Yes	Yes		Yes	SRFI 139	No vote	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	No	No vote	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
39
40
41	Anonymous voters (not counted)
42	11/14/2021 7:54:56	Alice P Hacker	Yes	Yes		Yes	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	SRFI 5	SRFI 156	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
43	11/16/2021 3:58:36		Yes	No vote		Yes	No vote	No vote	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	No vote	No vote	No vote	No vote	No vote	SRFI 219	data lost
44	11/16/2021 21:35:55	Sam	Yes	Yes		No	SRFI 139	SRFI 188	SRFI 212	SRFI 213	SRFI 61	SRFI 8	SRFI 31	SRFI 26	SRFI 5	SRFI 156	SRFI 210	SRFI 219	data lost
45
46	Normalized votes:
47	10/15/2021 21:54:38	Vladimir Nikishkin	Yes	Yes	Both	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	data lost
48	10/15/2021 22:04:44	Arthur A. Gleckler	No vote	No vote	Abstain	No	Yes	Yes	No vote	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	data lost
49	10/16/2021 2:52:16	Daphne Preston-Kendal	Yes	No	Syntax-case	Yes	Yes	Yes	No vote	Yes	No vote	No	Yes	No vote	No	No vote	Yes	Yes	data lost
50	10/16/2021 4:41:24	Roy Mu aka NalaGinrut	Yes	Yes	Both	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	data lost
51	10/16/2021 10:17:18	Taylan Kammer	Yes	No	Syntax-case	No vote	No vote	Yes	No vote	No vote	No vote	No	No vote	No vote	No	No	No	No	data lost
52	10/18/2021 7:45:47	Emmanuel Medernach	Yes	No	Syntax-case	No	No	No	No	No	No	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No	data lost
53	10/19/2021 16:03:33	Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe	Yes	No	Syntax-case	Yes	No vote	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	data lost
54	10/19/2021 16:29:43	Justin Ethier	No	Yes	Explicit renaming	No	No	No	No	No	No	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No	data lost
55	10/19/2021 17:31:06	Sam Phillips	Yes	No	Syntax-case	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	Yes	data lost
56	10/19/2021 17:49:09	Dr. Nicholas Carlson	Yes	Yes	Both	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	data lost
57	10/19/2021 20:30:59	Lulu (formerly erkin)	No vote	No vote	Neither	No vote	Yes	No vote	Yes	No vote	Yes	No vote	No	Yes	Yes	No	No vote	Yes	data lost
58	10/19/2021 23:41:47	Mark Hughes	Yes	Yes	Both	Yes	No vote	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No vote	No vote	No vote	No	No vote	No	data lost
59	10/20/2021 0:16:47	Graham Watt (gwatt)	Yes	No vote	Syntax-case	Yes	No vote	No vote	Yes	Yes	No vote	No vote	Yes	No vote	No	No vote	No vote	Yes	data lost
60	10/20/2021 5:03:19	Ross Angle	No vote	Yes	Explicit renaming	No vote	Yes	No vote	Yes	Yes	No vote	No vote	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	No vote	data lost
61	10/20/2021 11:31:15	Artem Chernyak	Yes	No vote	Syntax-case	No vote	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	data lost
62	10/25/2021 20:00:26	Gabriel B. Sant'Anna	Yes	No	Syntax-case	No	Yes	No vote	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No vote	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	data lost
63	10/27/2021 12:18:33	Linas Vepstas	No vote	No vote	Abstain	No vote	No vote	No vote	No	No vote	No vote	No vote	No	No vote	No	No vote	No vote	No vote	data lost
64	11/12/2021 15:50:03	Dmitry Moskowski (corpix)	Yes	Yes	Both	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	data lost
65	11/12/2021 18:08:17	Tim Van den Langenbergh	Yes	No vote	Syntax-case	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No vote	Yes	Yes	data lost
66	11/13/2021 0:12:37	Vijay Marupudi	Yes	No vote	Syntax-case	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No vote	Yes	Yes	Yes	data lost
67	11/13/2021 2:53:18	Jeremy Steward	Yes	Yes	Both	No	No	No vote	No vote	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No vote	No	No vote	No vote	data lost
68	11/14/2021 7:14:09	Martin Rodgers	No	Yes	Explicit renaming	No vote	No	No	No vote	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No vote	No	Only as a SRFI.	Yes	data lost
69	11/14/2021 16:24:21	Chris Vine	Yes	Yes	Both	Yes	Yes	No vote	No vote	No	No vote	No vote	No vote	No	No vote	No vote	No vote	Yes	data lost
70	11/15/2021 12:43:01	Jani Juhani Sinervo	Yes	Yes	Both	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	data lost
71	11/23/2021 10:38:23	Duy Nguyen	No vote	Yes	Explicit renaming	No vote	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No vote	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	data lost
72	11/26/2021 11:06:30	Takashi Kato	Yes	No	Syntax-case	Yes	No vote	No	No	No	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No	Yes	data lost
73	12/3/2021 17:21:29	John Cowan	Yes	Yes	Both	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	data lost
74	12/3/2021 19:09:44	Ondřej Majerech	No	No	Neither	Yes	Yes	No vote	Yes	No vote	No vote	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	data lost
75	1/18/2022 15:16:47	Vincent Manis	Yes	No	Syntax-case	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No vote	No vote	No	No vote	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	data lost
76	1/31/2022 3:33:03	Alex Shinn	No vote	Yes	Explicit renaming	No vote	No vote	Yes	No vote	No	No vote	Yes	No vote	No vote	Yes	No vote	No vote	No vote	data lost
77	2/1/2022 11:50:23	Marc-André Bélanger	Yes	No vote	Syntax-case	Yes	Yes	No vote	No vote	No vote	Yes	No vote	No vote	Yes	No	No	No	No	data lost
78	2/1/2022 11:54:10	vyzo	No	No	Neither	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	yes	No	No	No	Yes	data lost
79	2/1/2022 15:31:32	Jaime Fournier	No	No	Neither	No	No	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	data lost
80	2/3/2022 14:44:53	Amirouche B.	Yes	No	Syntax-case	No vote	No vote	No vote	No vote	No vote	No	No	No vote	No vote	No vote	No	No	No	data lost
81	2/4/2022 3:58:49	Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen [My Preferences]	Yes	No	Syntax-case	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No vote	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	Yes	No vote	data lost
82	2/9/2022 1:14:34	Shiro Kawai	Yes	Yes	Both	Yes	Yes	No vote	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No vote	Yes	Yes	data lost
83
84
85	Vote count
86		Yes	25	15	0	21	23	19	21	17	19	21	19	19	10	7	18	24	23
87		No	5	13	0	6	5	6	6	12	7	9	8	10	20	22	10	7	8
88		Total votes cast	30	28	0	27	28	25	27	29	26	30	27	29	30	29	28	31	31
89		Passed	Yes	No		Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes
90
91
92	Joint ER-syncase votes			Both	Syntax-case:	Explicit renaming	Neither	Abstain
93				10	15	5	4	2
94
95
96
97
98
99
100