Von: "jean verstraeten"
Gesendet: 14.01.07 22:51:16
An: "jean verstraeten"
Betreff: "The British Mind Control Agent"

HOVE (BELGIUM), 14 JANUARI, le14 janvier 2007

L.S. (See englishunderneath)

HET LOONT ZEKER DE MOEITE DE ONDERSTAANDE TEKST VAN23 BLADZIJDEN aandachtig TE LEZEN (IK ONTVING HEM VAN TON HOOGEBOOM).

***

Le texte ci-DESSOUS, DE 23PAGES, VAUT CERTAINEMENTLA PEINE D�ETRE LU ATTENTIVEMENT (JE L�AI RECU DE TONHOOGEBOOM).

***

I SEND THIS TEXT TO MORE ORLESS 5O associations, POLITICIANS ETC. I ALSO SEND A COPY TO A FEWCO-VICTIMS/CO-RESISTERS, IN ORDER TO SHOW THEM THAT I REGULARLY SPREAD TEXTSABT THE SUBJECT. (IN A FIRST ATTEMPT, I COULD NOT REACH YOU, BECAUSE THE SERVERREFUSES DEBORAH DUPRE.  IS DEBORAHAWARE OF THIS? )

IN PACe,

Jean Verstraeten

Vredestraat 65

B-2540 HOVE

( VERSTRAETEN.JEAN@BELGACOM.net=in small Letters : FOR THE MOMENT MY COMPUTER REFUSES TO TYPE SMALL LETTERS)

the British Mind Control Agent

By C L Heywood(Copyright 2006)

Contents

1.     THE BRITISH MIND-CONTROLAGENT (An Introduction)

·       Introduction

·       Battle for the Mind

·       The Mind Controllers (MCs)

·       The Human Brain and Behaviour

·       Covert Wars With CivilianPopulations � Human Experimentation and MKULTRA

2.     ElectronicHarassment and Implant Technology (Mind Control inPractice)

·       Alien Abduction and MedicalExploration

·       The Human Body, Radio Communicationand Electromagnetic Stimulation

·       The Implant Specialists

·       The Gaffer

·       The Design, Testing andAnalysis of Implants

3.     TheHuman Body and Private Home is a Sacred Temple?

the British MindControl Agent

(An Introduction)

Introduction

Conspiracytheory is a very controversial subject and has captivated the media�s attentionfor countless years. Journalists, due to their exceptional capability to sniffout a story, have actively leaked and exposed information of a classifiednature in an effort to prove to themselves and anyone who will listen just howprominent government corruption really is.

            Ona global scale every nation funds its own team of secret police and militaryenforcers whose prime objective is to sustain and develop national-securitystrategies and policy. Understandably the majority of their activities areconducted covertly on an extensive level; MI6, the CIA and the KGB being primeexamples. Their various dealings have always been enlightening if notinteresting, suggesting they have murdered, poisoned, gassed, drugged andbrainwashed enemies of the state and unwitting citizenry on a surprisinglyfrequent basis. It is also proven fact that these intelligence-gatheringestablishments have conducted unethical testing on their own soldiers and intelligencepersonnel using a varied range of lethal arsenal. Journalists have detailedthese arcane schemes and suspicious goings-on in their books, magazines, moviesand television documentaries. �Mind Control� in particular has taken centrestage. John Marks� The Search for the Manchurian Candidate,for instance, highlighted extensive CIA pursuits of mind-control intelligenceand weaponry.

            Undoubtedlythe pungent cocktail of national-security legislation and lack of primarysources to interview places restrictions on the research avenues thatjournalists may pursue. As a result, the secrecy surrounding mind controldevelopments has now piqued unquenchable global curiosity.

Battle for the Mind

Sincethe beginning of civilisation topical issues concerning the human brain havealways attracted substantial attention for a number of obvious reasons. Thehuman brain is a most valuable asset and extremely unique, as it holds theprecious cocktail of individuality and personality. It is what separates thetimid from the aggressive and the academically gifted from Mr Average. Thebrain controls physical movement, all cognitive capabilities (memory, countingand language) and regulates a vast array of bodily functions.

            Althoughsubstantial headway has been made in pursuit of understanding the brain and itsfunction, scientists are still a long way from mastering and controlling themechanisms that work within it. This situation has uncovered many dilemmas forlaw-enforcement agencies, the military and medical communities, who all believethere is great potential to be found in mastering physical control of the brainand mind.

            Criminalpsychologists, for example, are no longer blaming environmental circumstanceand adverse social conditioning as the sole cause of criminal activity. Theystress some individuals may be more susceptible to committing murders andassaults due to their inherited genetic wiring. This theory asserts that thereare chemicals within the brain which can trigger anger and antisocial behaviour.Those who commit grievous bodily harm may be victims of chemical imbalanceswhich they are unable to control without the intervention of drugs and otherinhibitors. Naturally it is hoped that brain exploration will offer someanswers.

            Medicalpractitioners and surgeons believe chemicals in the brain that influencebehaviour may be supplemented or suppressed by drugs which in the long run canmake an individual�s behaviour more desirable and manageable. They foreseegreat potential in the use of implants and other artificial aids to assist thebody�s performance and maintain organs to optimal working condition.Consultants view the exploration and control of the brain as a fascinatingrealm of discovery where new breakthroughs in psychiatric treatment and diseasecan be made. Utilising medical research and analysis, their sole objective isto rid the world of every brain dysfunction and life-threatening conditionknown to mankind.

            Themilitary, unlike the medical and law-enforcement professions, hold slightlydifferent interests in brain exploration. The brain, in their eyes, containsthe ultimate secret to world domination, biological warfare and intelligencegathering. They wish to discover newfound ways to torture, interrogate andannihilate enemy troops and civilians of opposing nations. They stronglybelieve that the man who can crack the complex code of human behaviour is theman who has the power to manipulate, control and modify the actions andthoughts of another.

Itis abundantly clear why so many government-funded establishments are interestedin methods which control human brains and minds because the capability todetect criminals, advance medical technology and win wars runs paramount withthe security and advancement of British society.

1.            Criminalscost the British government millions of pounds in surveillance, rehabilitation,punishment and victim-support services.

2.   Anunhealthy nation places pressure on the social services and hospital staff, aswell as spreading disease and infections which are difficult to eradicate.Humans with permanent illnesses are repeatedly forced into unemployment as aconsequence.

3.            Intelligenceagents and soldiers are very expensive to pay; the government could cut MoD,MI6, police service and MI5 workers by a quarter if they could infiltrateplots, assassinations, expose spies and ascertain threats to national securityusing quality technological surveillance and interrogation techniques.

            Scientistswho can unravel the mysteries of brain function are worth billions of pounds tothe British government and are now in mass abundance. Ultimately, it is theunhealthy and often stressful state of government politics, and heightenedsecurity fears, which have led to the emergence of the mind-controlprofessional.

            Manywill have their own definitions of mind control and its meaning, and thesedefinitions often vary slightly. This paper follows the assertion that �MindControl� encompasses all theoretical and technological applications which areused to gain minimal or complete control over an individual�s brain orpsychological state of mind and behaviour, both covertly and overtly. The aimof the game is to control an individual to the point where he will do themanipulator�s bidding against his will or, alternatively, to adjust hisbehaviour in a desirable way in order to satisfy an expressed agenda, whateverthis may be.

            Britishresearch into mind control technology is a very important issue and stands highon the political agenda.

The Mind Controllers (MCs)

Scientistswho conduct mind control research for British intelligence agencies arecommonly referred to as Mind Controllers (MCs). Their main aim is to:

·       design and produce lethal andnon-lethal mind-control weaponry which can be used against criminals, foreigngovernment spies and military personnel;

·       design and use equipmentwhich can counter the affects of foreign mind-control techniques, and preventspies and terrorists from extracting/intercepting information from Britishagents, military scientists and politicians.

            MCsare a special task force of multi-skilled professionals who are funded by theBritish government as secret agents. These operatives are deployed and assignedto a diverse range of projects depending on their expertise and, as a cohesiveforce, comprise doctors, psychiatrists, neurologists, teachers, criminologists,forensics, IT specialists, telecommunications technicians and child-developmentprofessionals, etc. For the most part MCs are employed within the social careand public service sectors and, as a result, have primary contact with membersof the public. This brings them closer to observing human behaviour in itsrawest form and enables interactivity with personalities and, ultimately,functioning brains. They are by necessity a rather corrupt lot as theirresearch methods often take them down roads which lead to performing bothinvasive and non-invasive procedures on the brains and psyches of well-adjustedcitizens without legal consent. These operatives, for instance, are notoriouslyknown for their involvement with implant technology, psycho chemicals and thebrainwashing of military captives.

            Asactive behavioural scientists MCs are great believers in trial-and-errorexperimentation and follow this principal like a bible. A practising mindcontroller must torture a real human being to acquire credible information ontorture and its effect on the physical body and mental state.

            Thistable represents just a snippet of the work MCs are primarily responsible for,and accounts for the substantial amount of mind and behaviour researchcirculating university lecture theatres and colleges.

Themost alarming aspect of mind control research is that experimentation on theunwitting human being is condoned by security bureaucrats and militarypersonnel, who have convinced themselves and the involved parties that theirsometimes ruthless investigations are honest attempts to search for scientifictruth. It is of small consequence if the pregnant mother is given LSD without herknowledge as the investigative results may revolutionise the way LSD is used inthe future by the British population; and by business sectors who treat LSDaddicts, and pharmaceutical companies that produce and examine LSD properties.

The case of Frank Olson, for instance, in 1953highlighted the dangerously dark side of human experimentation when thescientist plunged to his death from an upper-floor window after CIAmind-control agents spiked his drink with LSD.

 Thephrase �one life for many� is the core golden rationalization here and,irrespective of links with law enforcement, MCs aren�t strangers tounconstitutional murder as some of their projects are terminal, meaning thevictim�s life is expendable and the objectives of the study must be fulfilledby any means necessary.

            Mind-controloperatives establish themselves as law abiding social scientists whose primeobjective is to nurture society to help it flourish and develop to its fullpotential. In the idyllic society man is co-operative, productive, law abidingand happy to help his fellow man. He is flawless, a well-balanced individualwith the drive and motivation to promote and encourage happiness wherever hegoes. There is no place in harmonious society for his exact antithesis. Viatampering with the human brain MCs hope to determine what causes differences inbehaviour and find ways of manipulating the natural processes of thought andbehaviour with the intention of ultimately dictating it.

            Britishsecurity acts legislate MI5 (the security service), MI6 (the secretintelligence service), GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters) andnational crime services to work in partnership and direct support of oneanother�s schemes. Mind-control agents are no exception to this rule and havethe full use of government services at their disposal, including theMetropolitan Police Force. Their use of covert torture, expansive spy networkand spates of criminal activity identify them as some of the most influentialand dangerous civil servants functioning in political arenas today.

The Human Brain andBehaviour

Torun a plausible mind control operation MCs must remain informed about newdevelopments within their field. This means being open to the idea thattheorists from a variety of occupational sectors may inadvertently offer new,healthy, innovative notions from which feasible mind control strategies may beborn. This section explores two fundamental mind and behaviour theories.

            Onevery famous pioneer interested in the advancement of brain exploration was DrJose Delgado. He became the Professor of Physiology at Yale University andwrote the controversial book �Physical Control of the Mind: Toward aPsychocivilized Society�. Dr Delgado highlights the need to study the brain asa quest for human survival. He stresses that man survived life where otherspecies, like the dinosaur, failed because of his unique ability to acquireknowledge and adapt his behaviour to the harsh elements. He insists man hascome a long way since realising he could increase his welfare and wealth byinvestigating the properties of the planet and manipulating their function tohis own devices. He portrays the human being as a master manipulator of theenvironment, flawless in many ways but ignorant of the conscious mind workingbehind the innovations and formations he creates. Ideally the doctor hoped touse his findings of brain exploration as a stepping stone to creating ahealthier society.

            Hisgenius lies within his ability to carefully weigh up the advantages andrelevance of brain activity in everyday living. He states the following issuesas being at the foundation of his theory.

�There are basic mechanisms in the brain responsiblefor all mental activities, including perceptions, emotions, abstract thought,social relations, and the most refined artistic creations. These mechanisms maybe detected, analyzed, influenced, and sometimes substituted for by means ofphysical and chemical technology. This approach does not claim that love orthoughts are exclusively neurophysiological phenomena, but accepts the obviousfact that the central nervous system is absolutely necessary for anybehavioural manifestation.� (Delgado J, 1969)

            WhatDr Delgado highlights is the fact that the human body is a machine (controlledby the brain), and that its overall behaviour, response and function may bepredicted and modified. This theory reaffirms the MCs� suspicion that, with theright selection of armaments and expertise to hand, they could manipulate ahuman into doing anything they so desired.

1.      A prisoner of war may be brainwashed into another way of thinking using advanced conditioning and thought-reform techniques. Ultimately, the soldier switches sides and starts working in partnership with the enemy feeling and believing the enemy�s pain.

2.      A human being may be drugged and suspended in an emotional high of acute depression or prolonged euphoria for weeks at a time.

3.      Mind-reading machines could extract a human being�s personal thoughts and decode them into actual verbal or textual output. Intelligence hidden within the realms of the brain would no longer be inviolable.

Tounderstand further the full implications of brain activity on human behaviour,academics Mark Vernon (neurologist) and Ervin Frank (psychiatrist), who areboth active researchers in violence and anger management, highlight someinteresting points in their book �Violence and the Brain�. Although Vernon andFrank agree there are a number of factors such as poverty, family backgroundand negative social conditioning that may contribute and nurture violentbehaviour, they also believe the functioning brain holds substantial influence.They claim that all states of being and behaviour are an indication of thefunctioning areas of the brain; the brain�s interaction with the externalworld, memory and the association the brain makes with past and presentinformation and experience. Chemical balances within the brain, its physicalcomposition and response to transmitted information from the rest of the bodyare all significant influences.

            Vernonand Frank stress that there are parts of the brain that, in �susceptibleindividuals�, help trigger violence. These areas can be pinpointed clearly andare often associated with aggression-based feeding, fleeing, sexual activityand fighting. Their general viewpoint asserts that there are different types ofviolent behaviour, and that these negative outbursts can be analysed andcategorised into predictable causes, influences and outcomes.

From a political perspective, violent acts help to whittleaway and undermine respect and co-operation for the laws the British governmentuphold in the regulation of civilian behaviour. On a global perspective,governments are placed in the inevitable position where they must spendbillions of pounds on an annual basis paying for the damage that (foreign andnative) rioters, terrorists and vigilantes inflict on property. It is,understandably, the MCs� responsibility to help contain this problem andredress the balance of power.

            Dueto the nature of their work (espionage, sabotage and military enforcement) MCsare active participants in violence and aggression, but are also frequentcasualties themselves. It is only logical, therefore, that they maintain avested interest in this arena.

Covert Wars With CivilianPopulations � Human Experimentation and MKULTRA

Mind-controlvictims (MCVs) are very diverse characters of differing background, age, raceand class. Individual claims of victimisation tend to be extremely uncommon andare especially sparse in relation to the world�s population as a whole. One ismore likely to come across witches and Santa Claus than genuine MCVs.

            Firstof all, there aren�t any apparent limitations as to where MCVs and MCs arefound. Evidence clarifies that they are actively resident in America, Sweden,England and Canada, and most likely the rest of the world too. Secondly, humansubjects are usually �Mr Average� and have no social links with eithergovernment agencies or dissident groups. Only a sparse number are members ofspy networks, or terrorists who pose a genuine threat.

            Thegeneral characteristics of mind control victimisation suggest MCs are runningextensive experiments on MCVs ranging across continental borders.

1.      The British are deploying their MCs to foreign countries to acquire experimental subjects.

2.     Operatives are picking toorder individuals of varying background and personality trait forexperimentation at home and abroad. Subjects are administered mind controlarsenal unwittingly in hospitals, military bases, psychiatric institutes andjails. These environments are most beneficial and conducive to mind controlresearch as potential victims are incarcerated for the immediate. This providesMCs with the opportunity to control the treatment that subjects receive, enablinggreater flexibility. Operatives are able to use the results provided asindicators of how their arsenal would realistically perform in the field.

3.     Victims range from thenewborn child to the elderly, suggesting there is a great need for extensivestudies spanning a possible eighty years of an individual�s life. Undoubtedlyhuman development and age influence the efficiency and practicality of someforms of arsenal. When administering hallucinogens, for example, the dosagemust be customised to the size of the person, and gender is an obvious issue.

Perhapsthe most notorious mind control experiments known to mankind were thoseconducted by the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) in the mid-twentiethcentury. They began their research in the early 1950s under the code nameMKULTRA and it was rumoured that superpowers Great Britain and Canada joinedthe MKULTRA scheme as a partnership, aiding with the testing and intelligencegathering. The CIA were particularly interested in studies concerned withmemory enhancement, psychotherapy for psychological-warfare purposes, truthserums, poisons and electroconvulsive therapy.

            TheCIA had an extensive requirement for human subjects and strove hard to findthem. Unwitting victims were the most prized as their reactions to arsenalrealistically put theory into practice and was the ultimate indication ofsuccess or failure.

            MrHarvey Weinstein, a qualified psychiatrist (in partnership with the AmericanPsychiatric Press), published the book �Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of MindControl� to shed some light on the entire MKULTRA affair. In the book, Harveypassionately makes firm reference to his father�s admission to the AllanMemorial Psychiatric Institute (Canada), where he was treated by the renownedprofessional Dr Ewen Cameron who at the time had been commissioned by the CIAto undergo testing on his patients. The experiments hoped to provideexceptional insight into the effects of sensory deprivation, electroconvulsivetherapy, LSD, Chlorpromazine, coercion and thought reform. Dr Ewen Cameroncalled his technique �Psychic Driving�.

            Followingunrelenting global exposure and prosecution from MKULTRA victims, the CIA wererumoured to have burned all their mind-control files during the 1980s. However,conspiracy theorists and members of the American military remain sceptical,believing that the MKULTRA project is thriving but has evolved into a newscheme utilising exactly the same techniques and regimes.

            Britain�sMI6 might not have officially been charged with MKULTRA dealings like the CIAbut were equally active in the programme, and were major players in the racefor political power and world domination. Whilst mind control techniques andstrategies may have changed throughout the decades, the ethos and concept remainsthe same. The British Empire hasn�t faired badly in war on a global perspectiveand their pursuit of mind control strategy may be one of the many reasons why.

Definitions of some of the most prevalent mind controlspecialisms are listed below.

ESB (ElectricalStimulation of the Brain)

ESBinvolved the transmission of electrical currents (using electrodes) todifferent parts of the human brain. Using ESB, MCs could influence the humanthinking process, manipulate motor movements and place victims under a numberof different emotional states, like anger, happiness and fear. ESB proved thehuman body could be controlled externally via the brain by use of permanentlyimplanted electrodes and a remote control.

Sound Technology

Soundtechnology focused on the effects music and sound have on mental health; howcertain lyrics, melodies and frequencies of sound conjure up specificfantasies, thoughts and feelings within the mind. Tunes that were playedrepetitively, for instance, induced depression, violent thoughts, and a senseof loss and helplessness. Others cheered people up and invoked thoughts offreedom, anarchy and happiness. This led to the understanding thatconcentrated, prolonged, highly explicit lyrics could aid interrogations andthe �breaking� of captives. This is because musical lyrics and their topicalcontent (love, family, aspirations, sex and guns) linger within the realms ofthe brain�s thoughts via association even after the tracks have stopped beingplayed. MCs ensure the captive hears music prior to and after interrogation toinvoke emotional instability and lack of confidence.

Brain Mapping

Brainmapping was of great interest and concerned research that helped MCs pinpointwhich parts of the brain and body were responsible for different physicalcapabilities, e.g. the ability to recognise smells, hear, talk, read, countnumbers, be sympathetic and memorise. This line of research was pursuedprimarily with the intention of finding ways to understand and define humanbehaviour for eventual manipulation.

SensoryDeprivation

Sensory-deprivationstudies investigated the psychological and physical effects the prolongedabsence of touch, sight, hearing, smell and taste had on human behaviour.Popular techniques included those of:

• blindfolding captives using goggles and bags;

• forcing captives to wear sound-proof earmuffs;
• afflicting the ears with loud, frightening noises for prolonged periods in pitch darkness;
• bright, fluorescent, flashing lights, which blinded the eyes;
• exposure to severe temperatures of heat and freezing conditions.

Militarycaptives who were consistently denied their physical senses for weekly andmonthly periods were prone to extreme fear, disorientation, dizziness, nausea,trauma and suicidal thoughts. Captives also lost track of time and were unawarewhether it was night or day.

Brainwashing andBehaviour Modification

Thecapability to surreptitiously alter an individual�s point of view and directhim towards another way of thinking attracted radical attention from MI6. Theybelieved human beings could be influenced during interrogation andincarceration periods with greater efficiency, manipulating individualviewpoint and attacking personality trait. This strategy was achieved in thefollowing three ways.

1.      Attacking the identity of the person. Subjects are racially abused; prominent physical features, like a large or small nose, are ridiculed; religious and occupational beliefs are questioned. This depletes the subject�s confidence in himself and, in an ideal scenario, the subject takes on the manipulator�s viewpoint and wallows in self-hatred and pity whilst striving for new perfection.

2.      Stripping the person of all decency. The subject is denied clothes and forced to face the humiliation of being in the nude whilst perpetrators persecute him. He is made to beg for food and water, and asked to complete outlandish tasks, such as standing on one leg and hopping up and down for an hour. This technique reinforces the idea (in the subject�s mind) that he is owned property (a slave) and that to cough, laugh or urinate without being granted permission to do so is a sin and a direct act of defiance, punishable through death.

3.      Enforcing morality and conformity. Using a mixture of positive and negative reinforcement, the subject is rewarded minor praise and gifts for his efforts when his behaviour is deemed acceptable. This means extra recreation time, larger food rations, a clean shower and the acquirement of items like books, pens and paper. In the case of negative reinforcement, the subject is beaten, verbally abused, sexually harassed and tortured using a wide range of arcane instruments. The subject lives by the perpetrator�s rules without questioning them and does what he is told. Out of genuine necessity the subject sees conformity as a means to survival.

Sleep Deprivation

Sleepdeprivation arises when captives are denied sleep for two days or more, therebystifling the nervous system�s ability to function to optimal performance. Themanifestations of prolonged sleep deprivation produce, in human subjects, lossof balance, hallucinations, slurred speech, heightened confusion, exhaustion,disorientation, constant irritability and forgetfulness. British agentsinvolved in the interrogation of suspects rely heavily on this method as itmakes the extraction of information from prisoners easier.

Torture Techniques

Torturebasically incorporates any act used to cause pain and suffering of a captivewith the intent of orchestrating severe punishment, obtaining a confession,coercing individuals to take on a given viewpoint or enforcing behaviourmodification. Torture is an ancient technique often favoured for its aid ininterrogations. Usually the inflictions made on an individual result inbruises, weeping wounds or breakages to the skeleton. MCs, for obvious reasons,felt that prisoners of war could effectively be coerced into disclosingintelligence information through fear for their lives. The torture of enemytroops has always been deemed beneficial because even the smallest details ofinformation can turn a war around and gain the captor a substantial advantage.Strategies utilised included the following.

1.      Stretching. Parts of the body are pulled and strained beyond their full range of motion, causing uncontrollable spasms of pain within the joints and muscles. This can be achieved using the old-fashioned rack, placing ropes on the wrists and ankles so the body is fully suspended and taut.

2.      Cutting, piercing, burning and scolding. This is a slow form of torture where the pressure of discomfort is gradually applied under verbal interrogation. Naked flame, hot coals, heated iron rods and a range of instrumental knives and pins are applied to sensitive parts of the body. Skin gradually sizzles and cuts fester, leaving flesh raw and splotched. Cutting and burning are century-old techniques, valued because the instruments used are cheap and easy to come by, and most British soldiers carry matches and knives as a basic utility. MI6 don�t value this highly as a preferred technique because permanent marks of disfigurement are clearly noticeable and wounds caused by cutting and burning, if left uncleansed, turn sceptic.

3.      Starvation. The captive is denied food and water. The body left without basic sustenance begins to deteriorate. Within one to two weeks the captive is desperate to divulge information that the captors have requested; anything to relieve the demoralising, painful and desperate suffering of dehydration and malnutrition.

4.      Electrocution. Electrocution is utilised because it doesn�t leave cuts or abrasions to the body, and the intensity can be amplified and decreased using a remote control. The use of electrocution as a torture technique is illegal in most nations but is utilised on civilians in the form of an electroshock stun gun or taser gun by American and UK police forces.

Hypnosis

Hypnosisis a state of mind which is induced using concentrated focus and thought aidedby the guidance of an interrogator�s reassuring and convincing voice. Visualstimulation, physical movement, external noise and environmental influence arerestricted so that verbal suggestions are easily assimilated into the target�ssubconscious mind. It is hoped that, once the target leaves the hypnotist�spresence, the information assimilated into the subconscious mind will be recalledby the brain at relevant intervals. The target then believes theknowledge/information which pops up from his subconscious is the ultimate truthand follows this truth as a gut reaction without questioning its logicality.MCs often administer drugs to help induce heightened hypnotic states.

Aswith all mind control techniques, it is the careful mixing of variousapplications, i.e. LSD, hypnosis and torture or sleep deprivation, brainwashingand concentrated interrogation, which makes mind control a worthy adventure.

            MCshave managed to unravel an entire realm of questions and answers regardinghumans and behaviour. They have divulged the great possibilities empowered tocivilisation if the brain is controlled right down to the minutest components.

            Ifmind-control scientists succeed in their technological pursuits, society willundoubtedly have to make way for these new developments and evolve with them.Over a period of countless centuries, MCs will manipulate human-being behaviourusing a range of artificial devices, biological technology and socialconditioning to create the British government�s ideal harmonious civilisation.MCs will also utilise this same technology to bring down populations andforeign armed forces to the brink of destruction. Mind control is a developingscience, which is becoming ever more sophisticated as greater numbers ofcontract-funded intellectuals join the rat race.

ELECTRONICHARASSMENT AND IMPLANT TECHNOLOGY

(Mind Control in Practice)

Alien Abduction andMedical Exploration

Humanbeings throughout the twentieth century have always claimed to be victims ofmind control technology. Aliens from outer space have arrived in UFOs andwhisked them away to unknown planets and subjected them to endless routines oftorture. Implants have been surgically affixed to the ears and sinuses, andbiological mechanisms have been monitored on a frequent basis. Some individualsclaim to have been abducted more than twice and believe they suffer continuousharassment from their alien antagonists.

            DrHelmut Lammer, author of the book �MILABS: Military Mind Control and AlienAbduction�, brings to attention his analysis of implant technology and thealien abduction saga. The doctor claims mind control practice is rife, and paysparticular attention to the CIA and global-warfare history, both past andpresent. He suggests that some alien abductees are disillusioned subjects ofCIA-funded research and, in rare circumstances, have remembered what atrocitieshave befallen them. He backs up this theory with case studies of abductees whohave proof of medical tampering, and the unauthorised deployment of treatmentswhich physicians haven�t mentioned in the consultation room. Brain implants inparticular (of various designs) are most commonly discovered by chance due to apatient�s persistent pursuit of a competent doctor and satisfactory diagnosis.The implants themselves are detected by MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) andx-rays, and can be as small as a grain of rice.

            Heclaims the existence of aliens and their extraterrestrial implants are,therefore, not a reality, rather some fabrication of the truth brought intoexistence by mind-control professionals attempting to quash suspicion and hideillegal activities.

            DrHelmut Lammer alleges implant technology was developed sometime after World WarII due to increased global military competition, and that the researchconducted encompassed aspects of ESB, radio communication and telemetricmonitoring. Electrodes relay information from brain activity to a computer. Thecorrelations of biological activity are in eventuality decoded into actualbehavioural manifestations, allowing the subject�