Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Google

Results:

References: [ microtrack: 515 ]

Total 515 documents matching your query.

1. Re: M-Audio Microtrack 24/96 firmware update released (score: 47)
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 18:05:25 -0800
oryoki - you are on top of it. Just downloaded - below is a paste from the readme detailing the changes. -jeremiah This readme covers MicroTrack Firmware v1.3.3 -snip: installation instructions Defin
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-03/msg00055.html (13,792 bytes)

2. [gear] M-Audio Microtrack II (score: 45)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:34 +1000
Delivery of the Microtrack II is expected to start this Fall, possibly by end of October. Pre-release pricing on the Markertek and Full Compass web sites is below $300, but we won't know for sure unt
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-09/msg00106.html (9,115 bytes)

3. Microtrack 24/96 Review by a user (score: 43)
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:13:01 -0400
This is a review reposted from a private list serve with permission of the author who is in radio production / news. ___________________________________________ Howdy from the bleeding edge of record
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2005-10/msg00240.html (12,375 bytes)

4. Re: MicroTrack 24/96 ((((PLEASE HELP)))) (score: 40)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:55:41 -0800
I'd like to hear about any bad experiences using phantom powered mikes with this unit. Seems to me that Microtrack took an educated risk with 30V power. If it doesn't work with most mikes, they will
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-01/msg00368.html (11,653 bytes)

5. Re: MicroTrack 24/96 ((((PLEASE HELP)))) (score: 40)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:08:49 +1000
If thats the case. Would the MicroTrack be a better choice than the Edirol R1? phrase "phantom 48v... There always has but there that recorder 24/96. I've of that the http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-01/msg00366.html (10,201 bytes)

6. Re: MicroTrack 24/96 ((((PLEASE HELP)))) (score: 39)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:19:38 -0700
There is no 48v version... Some specs were confused when the phrase "phantom power" was used in the beginning and they "assumed" that meant 48v... There are even pictures where the power switch said
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-01/msg00361.html (9,647 bytes)

7. Re: M-Audio MicroTrack 24/96 power (score: 39)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:16:52 -0500
Len's review/comparison is informative. I hope he's not right about possible phantom powering issues from such low voltage in such a small package. The key for me will be the mic pre noise and gain p
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2005-09/msg00317.html (14,883 bytes)

8. Re: Edirol R-09 or MAudio Microtrack? (score: 38)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:37:13 +1000
I own a Microtrack and like it OK, though I have gripes.. I've never tried the r09. Microtrack Gripes: -Input gain options are not ideal, for instance, won't accept pro-level (+4) line level which ma
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-06/msg00195.html (10,014 bytes)

9. Re: MicroTrack power consumption (score: 38)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:37 +1000
The MacAlly JBox IP-A481 external 5V battery has a capacity of 3400 mAh, and adds 8 hours to the Microtrack 2496's recording time, according to the Soundprofessionals web site, That's 475 mA per hour
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-07/msg00229.html (8,724 bytes)

10. MicroTrack 24/96 ((((PLEASE HELP)))) (score: 38)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 03:35:50 +1000
Hi all, I'm new to this board and hobby. I am deciding on a first recorder to buy and I'm torn between the Edirol r-1 and the MicroTrack 24/96. I was leaning toward the MicroTrack for the Phantom Pow
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-01/msg00360.html (8,383 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu