Medicine 2.0'12 Evaluation
All questions (except the first) are optional - leave questions which are not applicable or which you don't want to answer blank
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
1. How would you rate the following items on a scale of 1-10?
Please rate the PEER REVIEWED PROGRAM (Sat/Sun) on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
very good
Clear selection
Authors only: Please rate the quality of the PEER REVIEW COMMENTS you received (if any) on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the KEYNOTE OF Jamie Heywood on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the KEYNOTE OF John Brownstein on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the KEYNOTE OF epatient Dave on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the VENUE on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
very good
Clear selection
Please rate CATERING on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the WELCOME RECEPTION on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good) (if applicable)
very bad
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the WEBSITE on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
very good
Clear selection
Please rate the GENERAL ORGANISATION on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
very good
Clear selection
Please rate overall VALUE FOR MONEY on a scale of 1-10 (1: very bad - 10 - very good)
very bad
very good
Clear selection
Remarks on your ratings, if any
2. Medicine 2.0'12 offered Rapid Fire presentations as a new format. Did you like this format?
very much dislike
very much like
Clear selection
3. What did you learn or get out from this congress? (e.g., did it generate any new ideas or contacts?)
4. What did you like most about the congress? (what should we keep in future congresses?)
5. What did you dislike about the congress, what would you change for the next congress?
6. How likely is it that you will attend a future Medicine 2.0 congress
e.g. Medicine 2.0'13 in London, Sept 23-24, 2013
very unlikely
very likely
Clear selection
Remarks?
E.g. what can we do to increase that likelihood? Also let us know (provide your email address) if you wish to be contacted by the organizer to resolve any of the issues raised.
7. Where should future med2's be hosted
(for other suggestions use the "remarks" box above)
1-least desired
2
3
4
5-most desired
New York/USA
Vancouver/Canada
San Francisco/USA
San Diego/USA
Seattle/USA
Barcelona/Spain
Seoul/Korea
Tokyo/Japan
Munich/Germany
Milano/Italy
Maui/Hawaii/USA
Boston/USA
Hongkong/China
London/UK
Sydney/Australia
Dubai/United Arab Emirates
Clear selection
8. If we were to organize an additional conference in spring 2014 in North-America again, and position the London conference as Medicine 2.0 Europe, would you most likely..
Clear selection
9. As Medicine 2.0 continues to grow, should we...
(we may use a combination of these strategies, but please select which one you would feed most comfortable with)
Clear selection
10. Do you prefer the meeting over the weekend or weekdays?
Clear selection
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy