still believe Saddam had something to do with 9/11?

but sooner or later, they will get tired of getting laughed out of conversations. The only way to believe this, is if you have been hermetically sealed away for the last 4 days.

FOX has no credibility with the left as it stands. Much more of this and they won't have any with the right or center either. That they would squander their credibility with their loyal viewers over something this patently ridiculous, tells me the repubs are even more frightened than we think.

Foley's name will be on the ballot even though he has resigned. Votes for him will go to the appointed Republican candidate. Any Republicans that think Foley is a Democrat will not vote for him, so the real Republican candidate will lose out.

to these republicant's. Don't try for one minute to foist your garbage on us. O'Lielly embaressed about a fellow gooper? Boo hoo. It's called having standards and morals. And news flash on that----you will not find them in rehab,the hideout for republicant's.

If they buy it, when they go to the polls, they'll see Mark Foley, "hey ain't him that Democrat?" They'll vote for the other guy.

He can apologize from now until 2030 but he will not be forgiven nor will this be forgotten.

I think this will anger some of his viewers.  It is so so so so obvious.

...Are ignorant enough to be confused by it, and that's maybe the ultimate goal.

Outrageous revisionism!

It's been a Republican strategy, abetted by the media, to present to sets of facts in every debate.  The media dutifully reports both as if the truth is in dispute.  Once a story is out there, it's really hard to kill.  I mean, how many times did we read that Al Gore said he invented the internet, when he in fact said no such thing?

run to Daddy....

My next sure to be unpopular diary is tentatively titled:

How the Foley Scandal Helps Bush.

stay tuned...

a lie makes its way halfway around the world before the truth even gets its shoes on

• mark twain

...Watch for the fair & balanced revelation on Fox.

when everyone's talking about how Hastert should resign and everyone knows he's a Republican...unless Bill decides to make him a (D)!!

Are you named after the Petronella turn or the Petronella balance, or are you named after (perhaps) the Green Mountain Petronella?

Or is there some other definition of Petronella that I'm not aware of?

-fred

then we can do this, right?

A real public service.

Watch video

Are anchors (versus pundits) biased? This bimbo asks a question that sounds balanced at first, but it's just a setup. Listen to her chime in with a "Right" towards the end. Is it the news anchor's job to offer opinion? Yes - only on Faux News!

At the moment, federal law prohibits the FCC from regulating content on cable or satellite providers.  Only broadcast stations are subject to the content regulations.  You can still get a cable/satellite channel for libel/slander, but that's about it.  Some Republican members of Congress have suggested (possibly authored) legislation to bring cable/satellite into the FCC's purview in their mighty and godly quest to rid the world of bare boobies, but it's not likely to pass any time soon.

However, now that I've re-read that, this Congress just gave this President the power to hold an American citizen indefinitely without charges... so I suppose anything's possible.

it has to do with SLANDER and LIBEL.

FCC doesn't enter into it.

I wouldn't even buy ONCE as a mistake, not after the last few days.

But to put it up multiple times - that's premeditated, and blatant, and FALSE and totally slander/libel.

IANAL, but I'd say it's worth a few billion for the DNC. It not complete control of Faux.

but don't set up a circular firing squad ok?

I really don't want to have to spam this bitch up saying "KOS IS A HOBAG! PROOF HERE!" again, ok?