Choked by the electrosmog
By ALASDAIR PHILIPS, Daily MailLast updated at 12:11 12 June 2006
Surrounded by 'electrosmog': From a mobile phone to electric hobs
Picture a typical British household at tea-time on a weekday evening. The children are sitting in the lounge, multi-tasking, which means they are simultaneously watching a DVD on a gigantic flat-screen TV, wrestling with a GameBoy, and frantically texting on mobile phones.
Upstairs, Dad is sitting, face screwed-up, in front of a flickering screen, sending a few business e-mails via a high-speed broadband connection. In the kitchen, Mum is bringing a pan of pasta to the boil on her spanking new ceramic hob.
It's hard to imagine that less than 100 years ago, the man-made energy that powers such labour-saving devices, communications equipment and entertainment systems was simply not available to the ordinary person.
Sinister side
But there is a more sinister side to the relentless winking lights, hum and high-tech glamour of the machines that have become such an essential part of our 21st-century lifestyle.
For those much-loved electronic appliances see not only that we are well looked after, but also that we are surrounded by a potent sea of electromagnetic fields (EMFs), a kind of 'electrosmog' that swirls invisibly around and through us every day.
This does not come just from domestic appliances, but also power lines, the wiring in our home, and telephone, mast and radio signals - and I believe it is getting more aggressive, more dangerous and harder to avoid every day. In fact, our exposure to electrosmog - the fields of force associated with electric charges in motion - has risen to a point where we are now experiencing levels that are millions of times higher than those encountered by anyone living at the start of the 20th century.
Back then, people had to contend only with natural electromagnetic fields - such as the earth's geomagnetic field, which causes compass needles to swivel north. As a result, all of us have become guinea pigs in a great electromagnetic experiment that I believe is the cause of much of our daily stress, and may also be responsible for serious health problems for you and your family.
I first began thinking about electromagnetic fields in the context of human health in the Eighties when, as an electronics engineer and scientist, I was asked to look into claims that antinuclear war protesters on Greenham Common were being zapped with pulsed microwave radiation from prototype 'non-lethal' weapons then under development by the US military.
By 1989 it had become clear that there were questions being asked all over the world about the safety of EMFs, and so I set up the independent lobbying organisation, Powerwatch, to look into it.
Wed discovered that some of the first warnings about EMFs were made as early as 1972, when scientists in the Soviet Union reported strange health effects in railyard workers who were exposed to high levels of electromagnetic fields. The workers experienced increased heart disease, nervous disorders, unusual changes in blood pressure, recurring headaches, fatigue, stress and chronic depression.
Now the phenomenon is much more widely recognised, particularly when it comes to mobile phone technology. There are mounting claims, for example, that people who use their mobile phone frequently or over long periods develop symptoms ranging from headaches and mild disorientation to cancers of the brain and neck. These claims have been disputed, but do we really know for sure?
And Sir William Stewart, the Government's chief adviser on mobile phone safety, has called for a ban on erecting phone masts near schools and warned of the risks of allowing children, whose thin skulls can more easily be penetrated by radiation, to use mobile phones.
But it is not simply mobile phones of which we should be wary. One of the more alarming developments of the past few decades is the rise of microwave EMFs:
Microwaves which are very high - frequency and rarely found in nature - are used not just in microwave ovens and mobiles, but also for cordless telephones (often erroneously thought to be a safe alternative to mobiles because they are run off landlines) and video and data transmission, and I believe they are pulsed out in a way that can adversely affect your health.
Household equipment that carries a risk rated from 1 to 5 and how to reduce your exposure:
CORDLESS LANDLINE TELEPHONES
DANGERS: Cordless phones are now the standard in most households and, like mobile handsets, they emit microwave radiation - from both the base unit and the handset itself - that is alleged to cause brain tumours, breast cancer, dementia, DNA damage, concentration problems, memory loss, mood and behavioural changes and fertility problems.
SOLUTIONS: Install a landline telephone that plugs into the wall-socket and remains attached to it by a wire and try to use it for most calls. If you can't do without a cordless phone, buy an analogue model, as their base units emit radiation only when the phone is active.
Avoid the newer digital phones (Digital Enhanced Cordless Telephones, or DECTs) as their base units emit radiation 24 hours a day, whether you are using them or not.
RISK RATING: 2 to 5 (analogue cordless phone score 2, older digital handsets 3, DECT 5)
MOBILE TELEPHONES
DANGERS: Mobile phones have long been the subject of claims that they are a health hazard. While conclusive evidence has yet to be produced to prove this, I believe they are a danger when used frequently or for long periods of time. They emit radiation even when they are on standby.
SOLUTIONS: Mobiles transmit at maximum power when you switch them on and off, when connecting and disconnecting a call, and while ringing, so hold the phone away from your body while dialling out, and don't put it to your ear until the person you are calling has answered. Use a hands-free kit with air tubes whenever possible and keep calls short.
When texting, hold the phone away from your body when sending the message. Store a phone in your handbag or briefcase, not in a pocket and not in a baby's pushchair. Don't keep your phone on a bedside table at night, particularly if it is charging - because the charger unit gives off high levels of EMFs.
Avoid using music players built into mobiles at all costs. The signals produce microwaves while you are listening to music.
RISK RATING: 5
COOKERS
DANGERS: The magnetic fields from a ceramic or glass-topped hob can be lower than those from a traditional electric hob, but some halogen rings can give off particularly high levels.
SOLUTIONS: I recommend that as well as avoiding halogen rings, you avoid magnetic induction hobs because, although they are very energy efficient and fast to use, they produce significant levels of EMFs. Safest of all are gas cookers, or slow cookers which use very low power.
RISK RATING: Ceramic or glass-topped hobs 1, magnetic induction hobs 5.
MICROWAVE OVENS
DANGERS: There have been claims of serious biochemical changes to the structure of proteins and amino acids in microwaved food and I believe that, for safety's sake, it is important to avoid meals cooked in this way if possible.
SOLUTIONS: Increasingly, there are allegations that the packaging of microwave-ready foods may release harmful toxins, so if a microwave must be used, put the food onto a plate before cooking it.
Be aware that radiation leaks from the seal of the microwave oven door, so children should not be allowed to stand nearby when it is on.
RISK RATING: 5
LIGHTING
DANGERS: Fluorescent lights, energy-saving bulbs and halogen lights all carry a risk.
SOLUTIONS: Use ordinary bulbs and non-halogen spotlights, which do not cause an EMF problem. Beware of cheap and old dimmer switches because their wiring can significantly raise the levels of electromagnetic pollution.
RISK RATING: 3 to 5, with dimmer switches being the biggest danger.
COMPUTERS
DANGERS: Computers and their monitors give off fairly low levels of EMFs, but if you are still worried, look out for the 2005 DELL Inspiron range of laptops which come with a three-pin mains cable and earthed adaptor and do not emit electric fields.
The biggest risk to computer users comes from broadband systems that allow 'wireless access' and in doing so fill your house with pulsating microwave radiation at all times.
SOLUTIONS: All VDUs - including TVs and office computers - give off a higher level of EMFs from the back and sides, so at work, it is important to make sure you are at least 3ft away from the rear of the monitor of the colleague who sits opposite you.
RISK RATING: computers 1, wireless internet connection 5
ELECTRIC BLANKETS
DANGERS: These can create a magnetic field that penetrates throughout the body. Most also produce an electric field.
SOLUTIONS: If you are concerned about EMF exposure, do not use one at all. If you must use one, always switch it off at the wall before you get into bed.
RISK RATING: electric underblankets 1, overblankets 4
DEEP FAT FRYERS
DANGERS: These pose a high risk because a deep-fat fryer will give off high EMFs as the oil is heated. Regularly reheated oil is likely to contain carcinogenic compounds generated at the high temperatures, which will then attach themselves to the fried food.
SOLUTIONS: You should avoid deep-fat frying.
RISK RATING: 5
PLASMA SCREEN TELEVISIONS
DANGERS: TVs with a plasma screen give off high magnetic and electric fields that reach a 6ft radius around them. However, battery operated remote controls are quite safe.
SOLUTIONS: Always sit at least 6ft from the screen - and remember that EMFs travel through walls. If you have a plasma screen TV in your bedroom, it should be at least 6ft from your pillows.
RISK RATING: plasma screen TVs 4
EXTRACTED from THE POWERWATCH HANDBOOK by Alasdair and Jean Philips, published by Piatkus on June 22 at £10.99. © Alasdair and Jean Philips. To order a copy (p& p free), telephone 0870 161 0870. More information: www.detect-protect.com
Share this article:
Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below?
There are many ways to prove this. Either muscle test your own body or use an electrosmog detector. Our environment plays a mojor role in the health of our bodies. You could also simply ask why is there such an alarming rise in cancer, heart disease, diabetes etc. As well of the lack of nutrition in our food (environmental impact - stripping soil of minerals) electrosmog can be clearly seen to weaken the body. Those that are sceptical will remain sceptical unless they drop their issues, remain open and investigate thoroughly for themselves.
- Robert Selkirk, Lichfield, 15/6/2006 14:41
No doubt all this advice will be refuted from engergy councils and the government. It's all about what you can prove and how many people that agree that counts. If only one person says it - even if it's true - it's unlikely that most will beleive it. I will sit on the fence and be cautious until more proof is found, though anything that we have created and that is not natural has to contain more risks than anything natural.
- Vicky, Staffs, 13/6/2006 16:54
**yourComments**
- **name**, **townAndCountry**, **creationDate**
Add your comment
FEMAIL TODAY
All smiles for Wendy's 'dying wish' wedding The brave bride married John Burns at a London hotel - before her chemotherapy starts on Monday Clothes horse show? Glamour model Katie Price shows off her skills in the saddle at Horse of the Year show Jordan rode into arena to applause 'I NEVER wanted to give birth to my own children, until I fell in love with Brad', reveals Angelina Jolie Star opens up in candid interview 'What the hell was I thinking?': Britney talks about her breakdown for first time The singer reveals what really went on during her public meltdown Goodbye girl next door: Katie Holmes shows her raunchy side on U.S. television Mrs Cruise shakes off her sweet image in high heels and slinky catsuit Look out Angelina and Jen... Little Suri Cruise makes the list of most valuable cover girls Suri joins the big league at number seven in list Sharon Osbourne rolls back the years - with a little help from the airbrush The outspoken TV presenter unveils her 10-years-younger look Double duty: Busy working mum Anna Friel's daughter Gracie joins her morning jog Who says it's a struggle juggling motherhood and exercise? Double trouble? Hugh Hefner's new Playmate twins on probation after beer bottle assault The Playboy boss must like his bunnies to have a lot of attitude Beyond the pale: Uma Thurman looks ghostly white as she bares all without make-up Actress looked a whiter shade of pale without her make-up on 'I was 21 and had a loving boyfriend but I, like hundreds of women, chose to be sterilised' Jacquelyn Arnold says she knew she never, ever wanted children Bump in the night: Blooming Mel C plays her last gig as she gets ready for baby The singer showed off her growing bump during a charity concert Fears for 'gravely ill' golfing legend 'Seve' Ballesteros The Spaniard is reported to be in an intensive care unit following a brain scan Bald it like Beckham: Wayne Rooney finally shaves off ALL his thinning locks The England star unveiled his startling new look during training- 'Miracle' of 13-year-old tennis ace who died for 15 minutes after heart attack... and survived
- Intelligent men have healthier sperm, study claims
- Daily doses of ancient Chinese herb 'protects the brain if you have a stroke'
- School bans pupils from eating Marmite - because it 'contains too much salt'
- Eco bulbs emit skin-damaging UV radiation, health experts warn
- Patients' apathy protects the NHS from complaints... even though one in seven is dissatisfied with care
- Why I, like hundreds of other young women, chose to be sterilised at the age of 21
- You CAN overcome fear by finding your 'happy place', say scientists
- 'How I weaned my son off Ritalin and proved discipline is better then drugs'
- Cats and dogs cut their owners' cancer risk by a third, researchers say
- IVF boom: British births top 10,000 in a year for the first time
- Health fears raised over electronic cigarettes
- Young mother beats odds of 200 million to one to give birth to triplets - while on the pill
- Climate change spreading 'deadly dozen' diseases, experts warn
- Gene link provides new hope for sufferers of most common cause of blindness
- One in 300 NHS patients killed by blunders, Richard Branson warns in new health crusade
- Daily dose of aspirin 'may lower risk of breast cancer'
- 'St John's Wort plant as effective as Prozac for treating depression', say scientists
- MORE HEADLINES
- Energy-saving light bulbs could leave you red-faced... from UV radiation
- Daily doses of ancient Chinese herb 'protects the brain if you have a stroke'
- You CAN overcome fear by finding your 'happy place', say scientists
- 'St John's Wort plant as effective as Prozac for treating depression', say scientists
- Cats and dogs cut their owners' cancer risk by a third, researchers say
- Health fears raised over electronic cigarettes
- Is your jaw giving you a headache?
- Young mother beats odds of 200 million to one to give birth to triplets - while on the pill
- Terry Pratchett: I'm slipping away a bit at a time... and all I can do is watch it happen
- Busy pregnant executives bring midwives to the office
- Wheat intolerance: the facts
- Snacking on nuts or avocado helps curb appetite with their healthy oils, finds study
- The hidden health risks for children of sperm donors
- IVF boom: British births top 10,000 in a year for the first time
- Born at just 22 weeks - Amilla is not yet allowed home
- Vaccinate NOW to beat bird flu pandemic, researchers warn
- MOST READ IN DETAIL

Part of the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday, Evening Standard & Metro Media Group
I was using my phone yesterday for about 5 minutes, driving in mountanious areas. I did some remarkable research and found that cell phone signals are actually much higher, directly corresponding with electromagnetic radiation (EMR) in rural areas because the cell phones simply need to work harder to receive the signal. This sucks. Those in the country are actually at more risk than those in cities, from cell phone radiation, however, they might be more protected against alarm-system radiation, big electrical lines, satellites and a whole bunch of other technological devices. A cordless phone emits 900mhz-3000mhz, the Wireless internet (WIFI) that you might be working on right now emits 300mhz-3000mhz.
- Ben Azoulay, USA, 22/6/2006 07:58