Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds. UPDATE: see details of how the data were collected for this article in the supplementary information. UPDATE 2 (28 March 2006). The results reported in this news story and their interpretation have been disputed by Encyclopaedia Britannica . Nature responded to these objections .
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional information
Additional research by Declan Butler, Jenny Hogan, Michael Hopkin, Mark Peplow and Tom Simonite. Supplementary information available online at http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Science in the web age: The expanding electronic universe
Science in the web age: Joint efforts
Science in the web age: The real death of print
Science in the web age: Start your engines
Supplementary information for this article
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giles, J. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438, 900–901 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/438900a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/438900a
