Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

More Ubuntu slopware USB issues

2 views
Skip to first unread message

DFS

unread,
Feb 24, 2011, 8:14:11 PM2/24/11
to
Ubuntu crapware will let you right-click and format a USB drive (say
from FAT or NTFS to ext4), but if there's already data on the drive, the
files apparently get put in a 'Lost + Found' folder during the format.

I say apparently because the silly hobbyware won't actually let you see
what's in the folder - or delete the folder; ownership is now assigned
to root.

http://www.angelfire.com/linux/dfs0/Ubuntu_formatting_slop.jpg


Note: no hobbyware chumps allowed to whine about opening a terminal and
doing 'sudo nautilus' or some such idiocy.

I could manage my files before, so why do they now belong to root?

In fact, why did it save the files in the first place? I was formatting
the drive - nobody who formats a drive expects anything to remain
afterwards.

And in another display of incompetence, if you format the drive back to
FAT, it deletes the 'Lost + Found' folder that belongs to root that it
wouldn't let you delete before.


MS is doomed by the confusing, inconsistent idiot-ware.


Lusotec

unread,
Feb 24, 2011, 10:13:34 PM2/24/11
to
DFS wrote:
> (...)

Instead of spending a minute to search information on the lost+found
directory (present in most UNIX file systems) you decided to troll COLA with
one more post (of very many) that is nothing more than stupidity and
ignorance from start to finish.

Truly pathetic!

JEDIDIAH

unread,
Feb 24, 2011, 10:42:00 PM2/24/11
to
On 2011-02-25, DFS <nos...@dfs.com> wrote:
> Ubuntu crapware will let you right-click and format a USB drive (say
> from FAT or NTFS to ext4), but if there's already data on the drive, the
> files apparently get put in a 'Lost + Found' folder during the format.
>
> I say apparently because the silly hobbyware won't actually let you see
> what's in the folder - or delete the folder; ownership is now assigned
> to root.

...you really have no clue at all what's going on here.

[deletia]

--
Sophocles wants his cut. |||
/ | \

RonB

unread,
Feb 24, 2011, 11:09:55 PM2/24/11
to

Don't have any idea what DFS originally wrote -- but *catfish* has proved
to be a great tool for finding specific files on my backup hard drives. A
tiny amount of research on Google can reveal many, many great utilities
for Linux. All free and also free.

--
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0

DFS

unread,
Feb 24, 2011, 11:41:00 PM2/24/11
to


You changed the subject and lashed out at me? That's not like you,
Lusotec. I must've hit a sensitive spot, and this time you couldn't
blame it on the hardware.

The issues remain:

I could manage my files before, so why do they now belong to root in a
'Lost+Found' folder?

Why did it save the files in the first place? Nobody expects or even
wants a drive format to retain existing data.

It's totally, totally incompetent: as a user I can't delete the bogus
'Lost + Found' folder (again, disregarding the silly sudo thingy), but I
can format the disk and this time it gets deleted.

Everything about the process is bogus and backward.

This! Is! Linux!

DFS

unread,
Feb 24, 2011, 11:41:31 PM2/24/11
to


In this case you're exactly right.

I have no idea why Ubuntu would create such a folder during a format,
assign it to root, but then let a user delete it on the next format.

It's just unintuitive college-level crapware, poorly conceived, poorly
designed, and poorly tested.


> [deletia]

[dementia]


Mart van de Wege

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:52:59 AM2/25/11
to
DFS <nos...@dfs.com> writes:

> Ubuntu crapware will let you right-click and format a USB drive (say
> from FAT or NTFS to ext4), but if there's already data on the drive,
> the files apparently get put in a 'Lost + Found' folder during the
> format.
>

Dear God.

Do you have to work at being *this* stupid?

Mart

--
"We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes."
--- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.

TomB

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 1:03:32 AM2/25/11
to
On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:

> On 2/24/2011 10:13 PM, Lusotec wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>>> (...)
>>
>> Instead of spending a minute to search information on the
>> lost+found directory (present in most UNIX file systems) you
>> decided to troll COLA with one more post (of very many) that is
>> nothing more than stupidity and ignorance from start to finish.
>>
>> Truly pathetic!
>
>
> You changed the subject and lashed out at me? That's not like you,
> Lusotec. I must've hit a sensitive spot, and this time you couldn't
> blame it on the hardware.
>
> The issues remain:
>
> I could manage my files before, so why do they now belong to root in
> a 'Lost+Found' folder?

Rest assured: you files are gone. The lost+found directory is empty
and just a feature of the ext4 file system. Look it up if you want to
know more.

> Why did it save the files in the first place? Nobody expects or
> even wants a drive format to retain existing data.

It didn't save anything.

> It's totally, totally incompetent: as a user I can't delete the
> bogus 'Lost + Found' folder (again, disregarding the silly sudo
> thingy), but I can format the disk and this time it gets deleted.

Reformat with what filesystem?

> Everything about the process is bogus and backward.
>
> This! Is! Linux!

--
If we could perpetually do blowjobs to every guy on earth, we would
own the world. And at the same time have our hands free.
~ Samantha

TomB

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 1:33:28 AM2/25/11
to
On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Mart van de Wege:

> DFS <nos...@dfs.com> writes:
>
>> Ubuntu crapware will let you right-click and format a USB drive
>> (say from FAT or NTFS to ext4), but if there's already data on the
>> drive, the files apparently get put in a 'Lost + Found' folder
>> during the format.
>>
> Dear God.
>
> Do you have to work at being *this* stupid?
>
> Mart

He will be as stupid as his trolling requires him to be. Also see his
silly post about the Computer Janitor program in Ubuntu.

--
There are only 10 types of people in this world: those who understand
binary, and those who don't...

DFS

unread,
Feb 24, 2011, 10:40:09 PM2/24/11
to
On 2/25/2011 1:33 AM, TomB wrote:
> On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Mart van de Wege:
>> DFS<nos...@dfs.com> writes:
>>
>>> Ubuntu crapware will let you right-click and format a USB drive
>>> (say from FAT or NTFS to ext4), but if there's already data on the
>>> drive, the files apparently get put in a 'Lost + Found' folder
>>> during the format.
>>>
>> Dear God.
>>
>> Do you have to work at being *this* stupid?
>>
>> Mart
>
> He will be as stupid as his trolling requires him to be.

Nothing stupid at all about my Lost+Found post. I was a tiny bit
uninformed, that's all.

And I don't troll. Ever. Only goobs like Justin and 7 and Rex Ballard
do that.

> Also see his silly post about the
> Computer Janitor program in Ubuntu.


Very apropos given the kualitee of the amateurish Ubuntu hobbyware.

DFS

unread,
Feb 24, 2011, 10:40:16 PM2/24/11
to
On 2/25/2011 1:03 AM, TomB wrote:

>> I could manage my files before, so why do they now belong to root in
>> a 'Lost+Found' folder?
>
> Rest assured: you files are gone. The lost+found directory is empty
> and just a feature of the ext4 file system. Look it up if you want to
> know more.

I did look it up before I posted the first time. Googled Linux lost +
found (no quotes). But I didn't read much - just saw a bunch of victims
wondering "how to retrieve data from a lost+found directory" and "how to
access the lost+found folder" and so on.

So I was wrong about it containing my old files. It isn't the first
time I was wrong, and it won't be the last. But it's a very rare
occurrence, as you know.

>> Why did it save the files in the first place? Nobody expects or
>> even wants a drive format to retain existing data.
>
> It didn't save anything.

I see that now.

But it created a folder - with root permissions - which I couldn't read
(without sudo), but then I was able to delete it on the next format.


>> It's totally, totally incompetent: as a user I can't delete the
>> bogus 'Lost + Found' folder (again, disregarding the silly sudo
>> thingy), but I can format the disk and this time it gets deleted.
>
> Reformat with what filesystem?


I tried FAT only.

Gordon

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 3:35:15 AM2/25/11
to
On 25/02/11 05:52, Mart van de Wege wrote:
> DFS<nos...@dfs.com> writes:
>
>> Ubuntu crapware will let you right-click and format a USB drive (say
>> from FAT or NTFS to ext4), but if there's already data on the drive,
>> the files apparently get put in a 'Lost + Found' folder during the
>> format.
>>
> Dear God.
>
> Do you have to work at being *this* stupid?

No he was born that way. Of course the fact that if you "accidentally"
format a USB drive in Windows then the files are LOST. Good on you
doofus - another Windows "feature"....and people PAY for that crap....

Chris

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 4:49:46 AM2/25/11
to
Am Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:41:31 -0500 schrieb DFS:

> I have no idea why Ubuntu would create such a folder during a format,
> assign it to root

That's a feature of the file system you chose.

> but then let a user delete it on the next format.

A user has no direct access to devices. Probably ubuntu has set some
policy rules that grants you direct access and thus you can format it and
"delete" it.

> It's just unintuitive college-level crapware, poorly conceived, poorly
> designed, and poorly tested.

No. You have just no idea what is going on.

Lusotec

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 5:57:33 AM2/25/11
to
DFS wrote:
> Lusotec wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>>> (...)
>>
>> Instead of spending a minute to search information on the lost+found
>> directory (present in most UNIX file systems) you decided to troll COLA
>> with one more post (of very many) that is nothing more than stupidity and
>> ignorance from start to finish.
>>
>> Truly pathetic!
>
> You changed the subject and lashed out at me? That's not like you,
> Lusotec. I must've hit a sensitive spot, and this time you couldn't
> blame it on the hardware.

I could have explained exactly how your entire post is complete nonsense and
how you insulting others for your ignorance is plain stupid, but why bother?
You only objective was trolling and in this case anyone with a minimal of
knowledge could see how very wrong you were.

Regards.

Chris Ahlstrom

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:20:08 AM2/25/11
to
Lusotec wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

Amazingly pathetic.

Well, that's what you get when a VB coder starts looking at things at the
system level.

--
You possess a mind not merely twisted, but actually sprained.

Chris Ahlstrom

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:24:35 AM2/25/11
to
TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

Exactly! This! Is! Not! Windows! This! Is! Not! FAT! This! Is! Not! NTFS!

This! Is! A! Professional! File! System!

In the crazed upside-down world of this "DFS" Windows user, a valuable
file-system feature is denigrated as "bogus and backward".

And you thought his Ubuntu bug reports were stupid!

As an aside, what the hell does this guy do for his day job?

--
If I allowed "next $label" then I'd also have to allow "goto $label",
and I don't think you really want that... :-)
-- Larry Wall in <1991Mar11.2...@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov>

Chris Ahlstrom

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:29:10 AM2/25/11
to
Chris wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

Poor DFS. He doesn't even remember the FMT0001.CHK (can't recall the exact
name) of the files "recovered" during a DOS CHKDISK, a poorer implementation
of the UNIX lost+found feature.

This range right up there with his "If it weren't for Windows, none of you
would be posting to the internet". In other words, evidence of an ignorant,
highly parochial world-view.

DFS -- The Ugly American

--
The story of the butterfly:
"I was in Bogota and waiting for a lady friend. I was in love,
a long time ago. I waited three days. I was hungry but could not go
out for food, lest she come and I not be there to greet her. Then, on
the third day, I heard a knock."
"I hurried along the old passage and there, in the sunlight,
there was nothing."
"Just," Vance Joy said, "a butterfly, flying away."
-- Peter Carey, BLISS

Chris Ahlstrom

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:33:24 AM2/25/11
to
TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Mart van de Wege:
>> DFS <nos...@dfs.com> writes:
>>
>>> Ubuntu crapware will let you right-click and format a USB drive
>>> (say from FAT or NTFS to ext4), but if there's already data on the
>>> drive, the files apparently get put in a 'Lost + Found' folder
>>> during the format.
>>>
>> Dear God.
>>
>> Do you have to work at being *this* stupid?
>

> He will be as stupid as his trolling requires him to be. Also see his
> silly post about the Computer Janitor program in Ubuntu.

Where is "Hadron" to "school" DFS on UNIX file-systems?

--
Even Ahlstrom had the balls to admit he got hit by grub errors and
kernel refusal to load nvidia drivers after an update.
-- "Hadron" <i9qnq4$5rl$1...@news.eternal-september.org>

William Poaster

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:59:41 AM2/25/11
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Chris Ahlstrom
on 25/2/2011 11:24 shattered the silence with:

Sweep floors?

--
VI VI VI The editor of the beast.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves.
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods."
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

William Poaster

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:58:07 AM2/25/11
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Chris Ahlstrom
on 25/2/2011 11:33 shattered the silence with:

> TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Mart van de Wege:
>>> DFS <nos...@dfs.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Ubuntu crapware will let you right-click and format a USB drive
>>>> (say from FAT or NTFS to ext4), but if there's already data on the
>>>> drive, the files apparently get put in a 'Lost + Found' folder
>>>> during the format.
>>>>
>>> Dear God.
>>>
>>> Do you have to work at being *this* stupid?

With DumbFor$ure it comes naturally. Probably from years of abuse of banned
substances. :-)

>> He will be as stupid as his trolling requires him to be. Also see his
>> silly post about the Computer Janitor program in Ubuntu.
>
> Where is "Hadron" to "school" DFS on UNIX file-systems?

Now, now! You know very well that the Hadron M$ zealot only "schools"
Linux users & advocates. He never corrects or schools any of his fellow M$
zealots & wintrolls.

--
Shell - The hardest part of Linux, usually opened with Bash.

TomB

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 7:03:19 AM2/25/11
to
On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:

> On 2/25/2011 1:33 AM, TomB wrote:
>> On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Mart van de
>> Wege:
>>> DFS<nos...@dfs.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Ubuntu crapware will let you right-click and format a USB drive
>>>> (say from FAT or NTFS to ext4), but if there's already data on
>>>> the drive, the files apparently get put in a 'Lost + Found'
>>>> folder during the format.
>>>>
>>> Dear God.
>>>
>>> Do you have to work at being *this* stupid?
>>>
>>> Mart
>>
>> He will be as stupid as his trolling requires him to be.
>
> Nothing stupid at all about my Lost+Found post. I was a tiny bit
> uninformed, that's all.

Isn't your credo 'research before you post'?

> And I don't troll. Ever. Only goobs like Justin and 7 and Rex
> Ballard do that.
>
>> Also see his silly post about the Computer Janitor program in
>> Ubuntu.
>
> Very apropos given the kualitee of the amateurish Ubuntu hobbyware.

Rather a fine example of mindless trolling. As is calling Ubuntu
'amateurish hobbyware'.

--
Engineering: where the noble semi-skilled laborers execute the vision of those
who think and dream. Hello, Ooompa-Loompas of science.
~ Sheldon Cooper

William Poaster

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 7:36:49 AM2/25/11
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, RonB on
25/2/2011 04:09 shattered the silence with:

> On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:13:34 +0000, Lusotec wrote:
>
>> DFS wrote:
>>> (...)
>>
>> Instead of spending a minute to search information on the lost+found
>> directory (present in most UNIX file systems) you decided to troll COLA
>> with one more post (of very many) that is nothing more than stupidity
>> and ignorance from start to finish.
>>
>> Truly pathetic!
>
> Don't have any idea what DFS originally wrote -- but *catfish* has proved
> to be a great tool for finding specific files on my backup hard drives. A
> tiny amount of research on Google can reveal many, many great utilities
> for Linux. All free and also free.

Tsk, tsk! Oh, dear...there you go again, teasing a dumb M$ zealot with the
word "free". :-)

--
FireFox - Why, wtf did he do?

William Poaster

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 7:39:37 AM2/25/11
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Chris Ahlstrom
on 25/2/2011 11:20 shattered the silence with:

> Lusotec wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> DFS wrote:
>>> (...)
>>
>> Instead of spending a minute to search information on the lost+found
>> directory (present in most UNIX file systems) you decided to troll COLA with
>> one more post (of very many) that is nothing more than stupidity and
>> ignorance from start to finish.
>>
>> Truly pathetic!
>
> Amazingly pathetic.

Laughably so!

> Well, that's what you get when a VB coder starts looking at things at the
> system level.
>

--

Shell - The hardest part of Linux, usually opened with Bash.

chrisv

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 9:18:52 AM2/25/11
to
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>> Dumfsck wrote:
>>>
>>> Everything about the process is bogus and backward.
>>>
>>> This! Is! Linux!
>
>Exactly! This! Is! Not! Windows! This! Is! Not! FAT! This! Is! Not! NTFS!
>
>This! Is! A! Professional! File! System!
>
>In the crazed upside-down world of this "DFS" Windows user, a valuable
>file-system feature is denigrated as "bogus and backward".

Well, if the toy operating system Micro$oft Windwoes does not do it,
it's not worth doing, right?

>And you thought his Ubuntu bug reports were stupid!
>
>As an aside, what the hell does this guy do for his day job?

Programs in Visual Basic, right? I guess that makes him feel like a
real computer heavyweight.

chrisv

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 9:23:06 AM2/25/11
to
TomB wrote:

> Dumfsck wrote:
>>
>> Nothing stupid at all about my Lost+Found post. I was a tiny bit
>> uninformed, that's all.
>
>Isn't your credo 'research before you post'?

No, it's "take a cheap shot from whatever angle there is".

>> And I don't troll. Ever.

Another bald-faced Dumfsck lie. Documented.

One Shot; One Kill

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 9:25:13 AM2/25/11
to

dumb turd "chrisv" <chr...@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:3lefm6hujce67hc61...@4ax.com...

> TomB wrote:
>
>> Dumfsck wrote:
>>>
>>> Nothing stupid at all about my Lost+Found post. I was a tiny bit
>>> uninformed, that's all.
>>
>>Isn't your credo 'research before you post'?
>
> No, it's "take a cheap shot from whatever angle there is".
>
>>> And I don't troll. Ever.
>
> Another bald-faced Dumfsck lie. Documented.

another useless fscking post from chrisv. documented.

"chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.

One Shot; One Kill

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 9:24:43 AM2/25/11
to

stupid turd "chrisv" <chr...@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:hcefm6lo75et1clac...@4ax.com...

>
> Programs in Visual Basic, right? I guess that makes him feel like a
> real computer heavyweight.
>

a turd like you is a real lightweight. a piece of shit is morally and
intellectually superior to you.

Hadron

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 9:31:32 AM2/25/11
to
Gordon <gordon...@yahoo.com> writes:

Well, you do.

Hadron

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 9:33:54 AM2/25/11
to
Chris Ahlstrom <ahls...@xzoozy.com> writes:

> TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Mart van de Wege:
>>> DFS <nos...@dfs.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Ubuntu crapware will let you right-click and format a USB drive
>>>> (say from FAT or NTFS to ext4), but if there's already data on the
>>>> drive, the files apparently get put in a 'Lost + Found' folder
>>>> during the format.
>>>>
>>> Dear God.
>>>
>>> Do you have to work at being *this* stupid?
>>
>> He will be as stupid as his trolling requires him to be. Also see his
>> silly post about the Computer Janitor program in Ubuntu.
>
> Where is "Hadron" to "school" DFS on UNIX file-systems?

What are you waffling on about now Liarsuck? Showing off again? Trying
to be one of the "Lads". Schooling is reserved for idiots like you who
make outrageous claims and are proved to be clueless. I know you know
about LInux but what shows you up is when you tell lies about others
knowledge. You're so eager to show off and suck up to other "advocates"
you get all excited and forget your limitations and previous lies.

And that is why almost everyone here ridiculous you on a daily basis.

Hadron

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 9:59:17 AM2/25/11
to
Chris Ahlstrom <ahls...@xzoozy.com> writes:

More systems use ntfs and fat "professionally" then do extN.

Why do you insist of making yourself look like an idiot in post after
post after post?

Tell us Liarsuck, do you use ReiserFS "professionally" too?

Arend van den Berigheid

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 10:31:12 AM2/25/11
to
"Chris Ahlstrom" <ahls...@xzoozy.com> schreef in bericht
news:ik83g5$dom$4...@news.eternal-september.org...

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAH!.............. that Professionals don't use!
Most "Professionals" use NTFS, you moron!

Clogwog

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 11:50:48 AM2/25/11
to
"Gordon" <gordon...@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht
news:8sp7u3...@mid.individual.net...

> On 25/02/11 05:52, Mart van de Wege wrote:
>> DFS<nos...@dfs.com> writes:
>>
>>> Ubuntu crapware will let you right-click and format a USB drive (say
>>> from FAT or NTFS to ext4), but if there's already data on the drive,
>>> the files apparently get put in a 'Lost + Found' folder during the
>>> format.
>>>
>> Dear God.
>>
>> Do you have to work at being *this* stupid?
>
> No he was born that way. Of course the fact that if you "accidentally"
> format a USB drive in Windows then the files are LOST.

Gortard, you're an idiot!, there are lot's of free programs to recover your
precious shit!

flatfish+++

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:11:35 PM2/25/11
to
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:33:24 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Mart van de Wege:
>>> DFS <nos...@dfs.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Ubuntu crapware will let you right-click and format a USB drive
>>>> (say from FAT or NTFS to ext4), but if there's already data on the
>>>> drive, the files apparently get put in a 'Lost + Found' folder
>>>> during the format.
>>>>
>>> Dear God.
>>>
>>> Do you have to work at being *this* stupid?
>>
>> He will be as stupid as his trolling requires him to be. Also see his
>> silly post about the Computer Janitor program in Ubuntu.
>
> Where is "Hadron" to "school" DFS on UNIX file-systems?

Changing topics again Chris Ahlstrom?

You really are a creepy suck up.

Marti Van Lin

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:18:47 PM2/25/11
to
Op 25-02-11 16:31, Arend van den Berigheid schreef:

The typical GNU/Linux hobbyist wipes the floor with those incompetent
Windows "professionals" and you know it Cloggy!

Just take a look at how I wiped the floor time and again with that
incompetent "professional" lunatic called "Sed" on http://Webwereld.nl
and "Sed" is probably *your* trolling nym on that site.

The incompetent "professional" claimed that it couldn't even get the
kindergarten distribution Ubuntu GNU/Linux to work.

Meaning he is ether extremely incompetent or dishonest and even more
likely both.

ReiserFS was the standard fs in SUSE Linux 9x (which is considered
ancient by now) and it was light years ahead of that steaming pile of
sh1t called NTFS.

Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?

"Professional" oh the irony :-D

>> In the crazed upside-down world of this "DFS" Windows user, a valuable
>> file-system feature is denigrated as "bogus and backward".
>>
>> And you thought his Ubuntu bug reports were stupid!
>>
>> As an aside, what the hell does this guy do for his day job?
>>
>> --
>> If I allowed "next $label" then I'd also have to allow "goto $label",
>> and I don't think you really want that... :-)
>> -- Larry Wall in <1991Mar11.2...@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov>

Back in the bin bucket you nymshifting jerk :-p

--
|_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin, alias ML2MST
|_|_|0| Registered GNU/Linux user 513040
|0|0|0| http://www.soundclick.com/martivanlin

Hadron

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:23:35 PM2/25/11
to
Marti Van Lin <ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> writes:

>
> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>
> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>

And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.

You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you? Yes. At system
start. I bet ANY professional Linux here has been caught by that when
turning their machine on and needing a fast boot up.... IF they havent
disabled it that is.

Poor Smarti.

Gordon

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:27:29 PM2/25/11
to
On 25/02/11 15:31, Arend van den Berigheid wrote:

>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAH!.............. that Professionals don't use!
> Most "Professionals" use NTFS, you moron!

No they don't - they use MS Office. Double moron....

Hadron

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:37:22 PM2/25/11
to
Gordon <gordon...@yahoo.com> writes:

Oh no. Another post. Another screw up.

And MSO runs on what Gortard?

Sigh....

flatfish+++

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:44:33 PM2/25/11
to

You beat me to it.

The Linux retards seem to be out in force today.

Hadron

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:47:04 PM2/25/11
to
flatfish+++ <flat...@marianatrench.com> writes:

I am beginning to wonder if Gordon is institutionalised. He certainly
isn't very bright.

Chris Ahlstrom

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:48:14 PM2/25/11
to
Arend van den Berigheid wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

I'm sure that far more use VFAT, Oh MP3 Listener.

--
The older a man gets, the farther he had to walk to school as a boy.

TomB

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:49:44 PM2/25/11
to
On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:
> On 2/25/2011 1:03 AM, TomB wrote:
>
>>> I could manage my files before, so why do they now belong to root
>>> in a 'Lost+Found' folder?
>>
>> Rest assured: you files are gone. The lost+found directory is empty
>> and just a feature of the ext4 file system. Look it up if you want
>> to know more.
>
> I did look it up before I posted the first time. Googled Linux lost
> + found (no quotes). But I didn't read much - just saw a bunch of
> victims wondering "how to retrieve data from a lost+found directory"
> and "how to access the lost+found folder" and so on.

Yeah, like you'll probably find a lot of 'what is system volume
information and how do I access/remove it' when you do a Google search
for 'system volume information'. Big deal.

> So I was wrong about it containing my old files. It isn't the first
> time I was wrong, and it won't be the last. But it's a very rare
> occurrence, as you know.

Yeah, sure.

>>> Why did it save the files in the first place? Nobody expects or
>>> even wants a drive format to retain existing data.
>>
>> It didn't save anything.
>

> I see that now.
>
> But it created a folder - with root permissions - which I couldn't
> read (without sudo), but then I was able to delete it on the next
> format.

That's how it works. Only root (or a user with the relevant sudo
privs) has access to lost+found. Just like you have to be root (or
have sudo privs) to format a drive. Nothing weird or backward going on
at all.

>>> It's totally, totally incompetent: as a user I can't delete the
>>> bogus 'Lost + Found' folder (again, disregarding the silly sudo
>>> thingy), but I can format the disk and this time it gets deleted.
>>
>> Reformat with what filesystem?
>

> I tried FAT only.

Duh, well of course you won't get a lost+found then.

Sorry DFS, but your entire OP was worthless. But don't worry, we're
used to that over here :-p

--
You just fulfilled the first rule of law enforcement: make sure when
your shift is over you go home alive. Here endeth the lesson.
~ Malone, The Untouchables

Ezekiel

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:53:39 PM2/25/11
to

"Gordon" <gordon...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8sq741...@mid.individual.net...

> On 25/02/11 15:31, Arend van den Berigheid wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Exactly! This! Is! Not! Windows! This! Is! Not! FAT! This! Is! Not!
>>> NTFS!
>>> This! Is! A! Professional! File! System!
>>
>>
>> Most "Professionals" use NTFS, you moron!

> No they don't - they use MS Office. Double moron....

The last time you called someone a "moron" it was because you had zero clue
how a browser string identified the OS the person was running the browser
on.

This time you're calling someone a 'double moron' when you are too stupid to
realize the difference between a file system and a office suite.

flatfish+++

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:53:34 PM2/25/11
to

He also doesn't seem to know much about the Bible.

The 9th Commandment (8th for RC and some Lutheran)

"You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor"

Hadron

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 12:58:42 PM2/25/11
to
"Ezekiel" <ze...@nosuchmail.com> writes:

Beautifully put. Gordon is laughed at by other "advocates" too. Not
ridiculed and sniggered at like Ahlstorm is when he sucks up but plain
old laughed at.

TomB

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 1:00:32 PM2/25/11
to
On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:

> Marti Van Lin <ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> writes:
>
>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>
>> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>
> And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.
>
> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?

Sure as hell you don't.

pass-num checks for dirty filesystems and only performs a full fsck
when needed, ie. when your disk is 'dirty'.

The regular filesystem checks you are referring to are controlled by a
setting on the filesystem itself, and can be changed with the tune2fs
command.

Neither fs check takes 'hours' to complete, and both are an integral
part of what I call a professional system.

What does this have to do with defragging anyway?

--
Age is not a particularly interesting subject. Anyone can get old.
All you have to do is live long enough.
~ Groucho Marx

Arend van de Berigheid

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 1:55:15 PM2/25/11
to
"Marti Van Lin" <ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> schreef in bericht
news:ik8o9o$p6k$1...@news.albasani.net...

Who's "Cloggy"?


>
> Just take a look at how I wiped the floor time and again with that
> incompetent "professional" lunatic called "Sed" on http://Webwereld.nl and
> "Sed" is probably *your* trolling nym on that site.

"SED", is that the name of your new boyfriend, who pounds your ass till you
can't walk anymore? and treated you like the helpless little bitch that you
are.

>
> The incompetent "professional" claimed that it couldn't even get the
> kindergarten distribution Ubuntu GNU/Linux to work.

This man is right, getting a kindergarten Ubuntu freeze_O_matic distro to
actually work, is a miracle!
The good part of this distro is, that it has Miguel de Icasa's mono!

>
> Meaning he is ether extremely incompetent or dishonest and even more
> likely both.
>
> ReiserFS was the standard fs in SUSE Linux 9x (which is considered ancient
> by now) and it was light years ahead of that steaming pile of sh1t called
> NTFS.

"Reiser" isn't that the guy who brutally murdered his wife?
He seems to be Bubba's bitch now, are you envious (s)Marti? ;-)

b.t.w.
Do you really think your lame block sender list will filter me?
Bawawawawahahahaha!

JEDIDIAH

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 1:26:22 PM2/25/11
to
On 2011-02-25, Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marti Van Lin <ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> writes:
>
>>
>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>
>> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>>
>
> And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.
>
> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you? Yes. At system

...and this goes to show that you don't use desktop Linux.

[deletia]

--
"Microsoft looks at new ideas, they don't evaluate whether
the idea will move the industry forward, they ask, |||
'how will it help us sell more copies of Windows?'" / | \

-- Bill Gates

William Poaster

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 2:22:22 PM2/25/11
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, TomB on
25/2/2011 18:00 shattered the silence with:

> On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>> Marti Van Lin <ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> writes:
>>
>>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>>
>>> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>>
>> And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.
>>
>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Oh, another doozy from the Hadron M$ zealot!

> Sure as hell you don't.
>
> pass-num checks for dirty filesystems and only performs a full fsck
> when needed, ie. when your disk is 'dirty'.
>
> The regular filesystem checks you are referring to are controlled by a
> setting on the filesystem itself, and can be changed with the tune2fs
> command.
>
> Neither fs check takes 'hours' to complete, and both are an integral
> part of what I call a professional system.
>
> What does this have to do with defragging anyway?

Only in the Hadron M$ fanboi's "mind". LOL

--
vi - An ancient Linux text editor invented by the Romans, commonly
called 'six'.

chrisv

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 2:28:56 PM2/25/11
to
JEDIDIAH wrote:

> Hadron quacked:


>>
>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?

That's sig-worthy material from the "true Linux advocate".

> ...and this goes to show that you don't use desktop Linux.

Poor Larry. What a lying idiot shill for the Micro$oft Corp, he is.

An Old Friend

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 2:31:14 PM2/25/11
to
Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start
> in
> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you? Yes. At system
> start. I bet ANY professional Linux here has been caught by that when
> turning their machine on and needing a fast boot up.... IF they havent
> disabled it

Since I've been using Ubuntu, I have NEVER had any startup disk check
take hours. I'll have to time it to be precise, but most of them don't
seem to last even a minute long.

That doesn't mean that I won't ever have a disk check that lasts for two
or more hours, but I've been using Ubuntu since 2008 or so and not had a
disk check that lengthy.

flatfish+++

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 2:37:47 PM2/25/11
to

Consider yourself among the fortunate.

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1467739

Chris Ahlstrom

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 2:41:55 PM2/25/11
to
JEDIDIAH wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2011-02-25, Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Marti Van Lin <ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> writes:
>>
>>>
>>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>>
>>> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>>>
>>
>> And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.
>>
>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you? Yes. At system
>
> ...and this goes to show that you don't use desktop Linux.

Hours? On a desktop? Just a few minutes on a 250 Gb ext3 partition.

--
What this country needs is a good five dollar plasma weapon.

flatfish+++

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 2:41:51 PM2/25/11
to

Big Steel

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 2:49:23 PM2/25/11
to
On 2/25/2011 2:41 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

<snipped>

You are at work, right? What excuse do you have for being here during
working hours. Do you sneak around and go to the NG(s) when no one is
looking? I bet your neck hurts from looking around when someone comes
into your area. I bet you pretend that you are doing work. You would
never survive in an Agile project managed programming department.

DFS

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 2:56:56 PM2/25/11
to


Added to the ever-growing list of Gortard blunders!

flatfish+++

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 2:58:54 PM2/25/11
to

He probably has a netbook hidden somewhere on his janitor's cart.

Hey Ahlstrom, we need another roll of tp over in stall 6 and the urinal
in the men's room is overflowing again.

Marti Van Lin

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 3:05:58 PM2/25/11
to
Op 25-02-11 19:00, TomB schreef:

> On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>> Marti Van Lin<ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> writes:
>>
>>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>>
>>> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>>
>> And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.
>>
>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?

Holy Cow "Hadron" you prove once again that you are full of shit and
don't even know the distinction between defragmentation and a file
system check.

Ubuntu GNU/Linux, which I use as my default OS, checks the integrity of
the file system every 30 bootstraps. It /never/ defragmentates, because
fragmentation is /no issue/ under /any/ "native" GNU/Linux supported
file system.

GNU/Linux FS are based on inodes /not/ the ancient File Allocation Table.

Fsck is the equivalent of MS-DOS CHKDSK /not/ DEFRAG, you clueless
clown! And in fact it /only/ takes a couple of minutes, /not hours/ like
you claim.

> Sure as hell you don't.
>
> pass-num checks for dirty filesystems and only performs a full fsck
> when needed, ie. when your disk is 'dirty'.
>
> The regular filesystem checks you are referring to are controlled by a
> setting on the filesystem itself, and can be changed with the tune2fs
> command.
>
> Neither fs check takes 'hours' to complete, and both are an integral
> part of what I call a professional system.
>
> What does this have to do with defragging anyway?

Duh! the incompetent jerk doesn't even know the the distinction.

What a surprise <yawn>

DFS

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 3:08:27 PM2/25/11
to
On 2/25/2011 2:49 PM, Big Steel wrote:
> On 2/25/2011 2:41 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
> You are at work, right? What excuse do you have for being here during
> working hours.

He has no excuse.

When he whined to his boss about the mean "trolls" on cola, I guarantee
he forgot to mention he posts here all throughout the working day, while
shirking his work responsibilities and billing full hours to his clients.

It's called "Linux advocacy".

> Do you sneak around and go to the NG(s) when no one is
> looking? I bet your neck hurts from looking around when someone comes
> into your area. I bet you pretend that you are doing work. You would
> never survive in an Agile project managed programming department.

heh!


DFS

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 3:13:08 PM2/25/11
to


If he scrubs real fast, he'll have time to get a cola post in between
cleaning the men's and women's restrooms...

Marti Van Lin

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 3:14:34 PM2/25/11
to
Op 25-02-11 20:22, William Poaster schreef:

> Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone& weary, TomB on


> 25/2/2011 18:00 shattered the silence with:
>
>> On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>> Marti Van Lin<ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> writes:
>>>
>>>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>>>
>>>> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>>>
>>> And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.
>>>
>>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
> Oh, another doozy from the Hadron M$ zealot!
>
>> Sure as hell you don't.
>>
>> pass-num checks for dirty filesystems and only performs a full fsck
>> when needed, ie. when your disk is 'dirty'.
>>
>> The regular filesystem checks you are referring to are controlled by a
>> setting on the filesystem itself, and can be changed with the tune2fs
>> command.
>>
>> Neither fs check takes 'hours' to complete, and both are an integral
>> part of what I call a professional system.
>>
>> What does this have to do with defragging anyway?
>
> Only in the Hadron M$ fanboi's "mind". LOL

Unbelievable isn't it?

The incompetent imbecile doesn't even know his head from is arse.

So much for "The Debian GNU/Linux user"

ROTFLMAO :-)

flatfish+++

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 3:19:19 PM2/25/11
to

I can just picture him knocking on the women's restroom door and
yelling: "Any cunts in there?" "I'm coming in to refill the sanitary
napkin machine".

Ezekiel

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 3:24:50 PM2/25/11
to

"Marti Van Lin" <ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote in message
news:ik9236$749$1...@news.albasani.net...

> Op 25-02-11 19:00, TomB schreef:
>>>
>>>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>>>
>>>
>>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?
>
> Holy Cow "Hadron" you prove once again that you are full of shit and don't
> even know the distinction between defragmentation and a file system check.
>
>
> GNU/Linux FS are based on inodes /not/ the ancient File Allocation Table.

Since when did NTFS start using the File Allocation Table?


>
> Duh! the incompetent jerk doesn't even know the the distinction.
>
> What a surprise <yawn>

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Marti Van Lin

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 3:30:18 PM2/25/11
to
Op 25-02-11 20:28, chrisv schreef:

> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> Hadron quacked:
>>>
>>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?
>
> That's sig-worthy material from the "true Linux advocate".

LOL, Quack proved time and again that /etc/fstab is a total mystery to
the incompetent know nothing.


>
>> ...and this goes to show that you don't use desktop Linux.

Hehehe, I'm not the one making up this restarted laughable nonsense. In
case you've missed it: I have completely removed /every/ instance of
Microsoft Windows CrapOS on /all/ my machines (including Virtual instances).

> Poor Larry. What a lying idiot shill for the Micro$oft Corp, he is.

He's a "Debian GNU/Linux user" and the sky is red, the water is purple
and the moon is brown.

Pathetic, just simply pathetic ;-)

Marti Van Lin

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 3:48:35 PM2/25/11
to
Op 25-02-11 20:41, Chris Ahlstrom schreef:

"Hadron" and fstab. The troll doesn't have the slightest clue what the
hell he's talking about.

Init? (oops)

:-D

flatfish+++

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 3:50:26 PM2/25/11
to
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 21:48:35 +0100, Marti Van Lin wrote:

> Op 25-02-11 20:41, Chris Ahlstrom schreef:
>
>> JEDIDIAH wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On 2011-02-25, Hadron<hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Marti Van Lin<ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>>>>
>>>>> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.
>>>>
>>>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>>>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you? Yes. At system
>>>
>>> ...and this goes to show that you don't use desktop Linux.
>>
>> Hours? On a desktop? Just a few minutes on a 250 Gb ext3 partition.
>
> "Hadron" and fstab. The troll doesn't have the slightest clue what the
> hell he's talking about.
>
> Init? (oops)
>
> :-D

Having fun on identica.ca, Marti?

The real fun is about to begin!!!

RonB

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 4:05:13 PM2/25/11
to

Just more Hadron bullshit.

--
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0

Chris Ahlstrom

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 4:27:47 PM2/25/11
to
Big Steel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

Kiss off, dude. I'm taking a fscking break.

You are stupid.

--
I'm EMOTIONAL now because I have MERCHANDISING CLOUT!!

flatfish+++

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 4:34:11 PM2/25/11
to
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:27:47 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Big Steel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2/25/2011 2:41 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>> <snipped>
>>
>> You are at work, right? What excuse do you have for being here during
>> working hours. Do you sneak around and go to the NG(s) when no one is
>> looking? I bet your neck hurts from looking around when someone comes
>> into your area. I bet you pretend that you are doing work. You would
>> never survive in an Agile project managed programming department.
>
> Kiss off, dude. I'm taking a fscking break.

So you troll COLA on every break.
And you call us freaks?

Hahahha!

> You are stupid.

No.
Just very observant.

Big Steel

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 4:57:53 PM2/25/11
to

All fucking day long 5 days a week you are on a break? If you work 2
hours a day, you are lying to your boss. They need to monitor you and
see just what you are doing to earn a paycheck. What's your boss's phone
number. Let me speak to him or her about what I see here with you not
doing a day's work for the company. :)

JEDIDIAH

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 5:07:23 PM2/25/11
to

...a thread of 3 messages about a bug that's been fixed already.

You must have really drawn blanks when you were trying to trawl the world
for this one.

JEDIDIAH

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 5:06:01 PM2/25/11
to
On 2011-02-25, flatfish+++ <flat...@marianatrench.com> wrote:

...which is a bug that's already been fixed.

Chris Ahlstrom

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:06:46 PM2/25/11
to

Get out of my face, ankle-biter.

No one cares what you say.

--
yip yip yip

William Poaster

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:13:01 PM2/25/11
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Chris Ahlstrom
on 25/2/2011 23:06 shattered the silence with:

Doesn't that apply to Duh-Inane asshole, who (someone said) is supposed to
be an IT professional, yet posts a LOT in here under various nyms "All
fucking day long 5 days a week" ?

--
Linux: because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.

Chris Ahlstrom

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:21:16 PM2/25/11
to
William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Chris Ahlstrom
> on 25/2/2011 23:06 shattered the silence with:
>
>> Big Steel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On 2/25/2011 4:27 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>> All fucking day long 5 days a week you are on a break? If you work 2
>>> hours a day, you are lying to your boss. They need to monitor you and
>>> see just what you are doing to earn a paycheck. What's your boss's phone
>>> number. Let me speak to him or her about what I see here with you not
>>> doing a day's work for the company. :)
>>
>> Get out of my face, ankle-biter.
>>
>> No one cares what you say.
>
> "All fucking day long 5 days a week you are on a break? If you work 2
> hours a day, you are lying to your boss. They need to monitor you and
> see just what you are doing to earn a paycheck. What's your boss's phone
> number. Let me speak to him or her about what I see here with you not
> oing a day's work for the company."
>
> Doesn't that apply to Duh-Inane asshole, who (someone said) is supposed to
> be an IT professional, yet posts a LOT in here under various nyms "All
> fucking day long 5 days a week" ?

And such a coprolalic crap flood at that!

Isn't he also the numbnuts that claimed to work with the Air Force and have
a "Secret" clearance?

--
Tom's hungry, time to eat lunch.

Big Steel

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:21:14 PM2/25/11
to
On 2/25/2011 6:13 PM, William Poaster wrote:

> Doesn't that apply to Duh-Inane asshole, who (someone said) is supposed to
> be an IT professional, yet posts a LOT in here under various nyms "All
> fucking day long 5 days a week" ?
>

This is a fucking lie. I showed up here today, because it snowed and the
freeway was too bad to drive on and I stayed home. I have an 1.5 hour
drive to work. I was not doing it in bad weather.

The damn loon thinks someone is posting under various nyms. The damn
loon thinks someone is here all day long posting? The old fool is
mumbling again, but that's old Mumbles Boaster for you.

William Poaster

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:20:59 PM2/25/11
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Chris Ahlstrom
on 25/2/2011 21:27 shattered the silence with:

What excuse does Duh-Inane asshole have for posting during working hours?
After all he's claimed to be an IT professional (yeah, riiight) & have a
job.

--
Gnu: The feeling you've seen this wildebeest before.

William Poaster

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:21:57 PM2/25/11
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Marti Van Lin
on 25/2/2011 20:48 shattered the silence with:

> Op 25-02-11 20:41, Chris Ahlstrom schreef:
>
>> JEDIDIAH wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On 2011-02-25, Hadron<hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Marti Van Lin<ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>>>>
>>>>> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.
>>>>
>>>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>>>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you? Yes. At system
>>>
>>> ...and this goes to show that you don't use desktop Linux.
>>
>> Hours? On a desktop? Just a few minutes on a 250 Gb ext3 partition.
>
> "Hadron" and fstab. The troll doesn't have the slightest clue what the
> hell he's talking about.

Of course not, because he doesn't use Linux. I believe that at one time at
least three people tried to explain fstab to him, & he *didn't get it*.
Hardly surprising, as he's as thick as a brick.

> Init? (oops)

Heh.

> :-D
>

--
FireFox - Why, wtf did he do?

Big Steel

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:25:15 PM2/25/11
to
On 2/25/2011 6:21 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
z

> Isn't he also the numbnuts that claimed to work with the Air Force and have
> a "Secret" clearance?
>

Fool, that was over a year ago. I have since worked for the Army due to
the clearance. Now I am back in the private sector working. But that's
what .NET contractors do stupid, while you sit at your stupid desk not
making any serious money dreaming you were a Linux programmer. The dream
is never going to come true for you.


Big Steel

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:28:03 PM2/25/11
to
On 2/25/2011 6:21 PM, William Poaster wrote:
> Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone& weary, Marti Van Lin

> on 25/2/2011 20:48 shattered the silence with:
>
>> Op 25-02-11 20:41, Chris Ahlstrom schreef:
>>
>>> JEDIDIAH wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> On 2011-02-25, Hadron<hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Marti Van Lin<ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>>>>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you? Yes. At system
>>>>
>>>> ...and this goes to show that you don't use desktop Linux.
>>>
>>> Hours? On a desktop? Just a few minutes on a 250 Gb ext3 partition.
>>
>> "Hadron" and fstab. The troll doesn't have the slightest clue what the
>> hell he's talking about.
>
> Of course not, because he doesn't use Linux. I believe that at one time at
> least three people tried to explain fstab to him,& he *didn't get it*.

> Hardly surprising, as he's as thick as a brick.
>
>> Init? (oops)
>
> Heh.
>
>> :-D
>>
>

He is just a butt-kisser the old master of it.

William Poaster

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:39:06 PM2/25/11
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Chris Ahlstrom
on 25/2/2011 23:21 shattered the silence with:

He probably did claim that, but if anyone believes it, I have a bridge
for sale...

--
Don't confuse a wintroll with facts, its mind is already made up.

Peter Köhlmann

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:38:26 PM2/25/11
to
William Poaster wrote:

> Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Chris Ahlstrom
> on 25/2/2011 21:27 shattered the silence with:
>
>> Big Steel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On 2/25/2011 2:41 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>> <snipped>
>>>
>>> You are at work, right? What excuse do you have for being here during
>>> working hours. Do you sneak around and go to the NG(s) when no one is
>>> looking? I bet your neck hurts from looking around when someone comes
>>> into your area. I bet you pretend that you are doing work. You would
>>> never survive in an Agile project managed programming department.
>>
>> Kiss off, dude. I'm taking a fscking break.
>>
>> You are stupid.
>
> What excuse does Duh-Inane asshole have for posting during working hours?
> After all he's claimed to be an IT professional (yeah, riiight) & have a
> job.
>

"Had a job" would be more to the point.

Getting fired for gross incompetence swiping parking lots was what happened to
him.

That cretin is not smart enough to spill a bucket of water
--
Computers are like air conditioners -
they stop working properly when you open Windows

Big Steel

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:47:27 PM2/25/11
to
On 2/25/2011 6:20 PM, William Poaster wrote:

<snipped>

Look at the old fool, someone get him an old man's diaper. He needs to
be changed.

William Poaster

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:47:08 PM2/25/11
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Marti Van Lin
on 25/2/2011 20:14 shattered the silence with:

> Op 25-02-11 20:22, William Poaster schreef:
>
>> Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone& weary, TomB on
>> 25/2/2011 18:00 shattered the silence with:
>>
>>> On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>>> Marti Van Lin<ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>>>>
>>>>> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>>>>
>>>> And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.
>>>>
>>>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>>>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?
>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
>> Oh, another doozy from the Hadron M$ zealot!
>>
>>> Sure as hell you don't.
>>>
>>> pass-num checks for dirty filesystems and only performs a full fsck
>>> when needed, ie. when your disk is 'dirty'.
>>>
>>> The regular filesystem checks you are referring to are controlled by a
>>> setting on the filesystem itself, and can be changed with the tune2fs
>>> command.
>>>
>>> Neither fs check takes 'hours' to complete, and both are an integral
>>> part of what I call a professional system.
>>>
>>> What does this have to do with defragging anyway?
>>
>> Only in the Hadron M$ fanboi's "mind". LOL
>
> Unbelievable isn't it?
>
> The incompetent imbecile doesn't even know his head from is arse.

Ah, but he *does* know his elbow from his arse, because he can't talk out
of his elbow!

> So much for "The Debian GNU/Linux user"
>
> ROTFLMAO :-)

HAHAHAHA...etc.

--
Linux - for IQs greater than 2000.

Peter Köhlmann

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:48:33 PM2/25/11
to
William Poaster wrote:

Hundreds of bridges, actually. And all just slightly used
--
Microsoft Windows - The art of incompetence.

Chris

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:41:46 PM2/25/11
to
Am Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:23:35 +0100 schrieb Hadron:

> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in

> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you? Yes.
On how many levels is this wrong?

* That's not a setup of distributions. That's a "feature" of the ext
filesystems.

* Since it's a feature of the filesystem (and not a mount option) it is
not set up in fstab.

Since you are too lazy to read the manpage of tune2fs I will waste space
on usenet for you:

-c max-mount-counts
Adjust the number of mounts after which the filesystem will
be checked by e2fsck(8). If max-mount-counts is 0 or -1, the number of
times the filesystem is mounted will be disregarded by e2fsck(8) and the
kernel.

Staggering the mount-counts at which filesystems are
forcibly checked will avoid all filesystems being checked at one time
when using journaled filesystems.

You should strongly consider the consequences of
disabling mount-count-dependent checking entirely. Bad disk drives,
cables, memory, and kernel bugs could all corrupt a filesystem without
marking the filesystem dirty or in error. If you are
using journaling on your filesystem, your filesystem will
never be marked dirty, so it will not normally be checked. A filesystem
error detected by the kernel will still force an fsck on the next reboot,
but it may already be too late to prevent
data loss at that point.

See also the -i option for time-dependent checking.

[...]

-i interval-between-checks[d|m|w]
Adjust the maximal time between two filesystem checks. No
suffix or d will interpret the number interval-between-checks as days, m
as months, and w as weeks. A value of zero will disable the time-
dependent checking.

It is strongly recommended that either -c (mount-
count-dependent) or -i (time-dependent) checking be enabled to force
periodic full e2fsck(8) checking of the filesystem. Failure to do so may
lead to filesystem corruption (due to bad disks,
cables, memory, or kernel bugs) going unnoticed, ultimately
resulting in data loss or corruption.


On the other hand I have a very old ext3 filesystem as my home without
any forced checks and I never had data loss or corruption.
It's just not too safe to do it this way.

> At system
> start. I bet ANY professional Linux here has been caught by that when
> turning their machine on and needing a fast boot up.... IF they havent

> disabled it that is.
I think Ubuntu has had this feature for several years now that when fsck
runs on the boot screen that you can abort it with ESC and boot
immediately.
(Yes, while checking the filesystem it shows a message that you can abort
with ESC)

> Poor Smarti.
What?

William Poaster

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:48:30 PM2/25/11
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Marti Van Lin
on 25/2/2011 20:05 shattered the silence with:

> Op 25-02-11 19:00, TomB schreef:


>
>> On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>> Marti Van Lin<ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> writes:
>>>
>>>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>>>
>>>> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>>>
>>> And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.
>>>

>>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?
>

> Holy Cow "Hadron" you prove once again that you are full of shit and
> don't even know the distinction between defragmentation and a file
> system check.
>

> Ubuntu GNU/Linux, which I use as my default OS, checks the integrity of
> the file system every 30 bootstraps. It /never/ defragmentates, because
> fragmentation is /no issue/ under /any/ "native" GNU/Linux supported
> file system.


>
> GNU/Linux FS are based on inodes /not/ the ancient File Allocation Table.
>

> Fsck is the equivalent of MS-DOS CHKDSK /not/ DEFRAG, you clueless
> clown! And in fact it /only/ takes a couple of minutes, /not hours/ like
> you claim.


>
>> Sure as hell you don't.
>>
>> pass-num checks for dirty filesystems and only performs a full fsck
>> when needed, ie. when your disk is 'dirty'.
>>
>> The regular filesystem checks you are referring to are controlled by a
>> setting on the filesystem itself, and can be changed with the tune2fs
>> command.
>>
>> Neither fs check takes 'hours' to complete, and both are an integral
>> part of what I call a professional system.
>>
>> What does this have to do with defragging anyway?
>

> Duh! the incompetent jerk doesn't even know the the distinction.
>
> What a surprise <yawn>

I think this thread is going down as another classic of Quack's idiocy!

--
Don't confuse a wintroll with facts, its mind is already made up.

Big Steel

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:50:50 PM2/25/11
to
On 2/25/2011 6:38 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> William Poaster wrote:
>
>> Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone& weary, Chris Ahlstrom

>> on 25/2/2011 21:27 shattered the silence with:
>>
>>> Big Steel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> On 2/25/2011 2:41 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snipped>
>>>>
>>>> You are at work, right? What excuse do you have for being here during
>>>> working hours. Do you sneak around and go to the NG(s) when no one is
>>>> looking? I bet your neck hurts from looking around when someone comes
>>>> into your area. I bet you pretend that you are doing work. You would
>>>> never survive in an Agile project managed programming department.
>>>
>>> Kiss off, dude. I'm taking a fscking break.
>>>
>>> You are stupid.
>>
>> What excuse does Duh-Inane asshole have for posting during working hours?
>> After all he's claimed to be an IT professional (yeah, riiight)& have a

>> job.
>>
>
> "Had a job" would be more to the point.
>
> Getting fired for gross incompetence swiping parking lots was what happened to
> him.
>
> That cretin is not smart enough to spill a bucket of water

You are a liar. I took the day off. What excuse do you have for being
here weakness. I know why Boaster is here all day long. He is an old
retired fool that only has this NG to keep him going.

What is your excuse stupid?

William Poaster

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:52:45 PM2/25/11
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Marti Van Lin
on 25/2/2011 20:30 shattered the silence with:

> Op 25-02-11 20:28, chrisv schreef:
>
>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>
>>> Hadron quacked:
>>>>
>>>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
>>>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?
>>
>> That's sig-worthy material from the "true Linux advocate".
>
> LOL, Quack proved time and again that /etc/fstab is a total mystery to
> the incompetent know nothing.

Yes, I remember that. What a laugh that was! You'd have to really work at
it to be that dumb.

I think this is going to be another "Quack's Classic Buffonery" thread. ;-)

>>> ...and this goes to show that you don't use desktop Linux.
>
> Hehehe, I'm not the one making up this restarted laughable nonsense. In
> case you've missed it: I have completely removed /every/ instance of
> Microsoft Windows CrapOS on /all/ my machines (including Virtual instances).
>
>> Poor Larry. What a lying idiot shill for the Micro$oft Corp, he is.
>
> He's a "Debian GNU/Linux user" and the sky is red, the water is purple
> and the moon is brown.

LOL.

> Pathetic, just simply pathetic ;-)

Heh.

--
Linux: Do you want to delete Windows today?

Big Steel

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:54:22 PM2/25/11
to
On 2/25/2011 6:39 PM, William Poaster wrote:
>
> He probably did claim that, but if anyone believes it, I have a bridge
> for sale...
>

You don't have a bridge for sale, but it's still the truth. I don't lie
like the lying and give half truths like lying COLA dogs like him and
others in this no count NG.

Big Steel

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 6:55:29 PM2/25/11
to
On 2/25/2011 6:48 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> Hundreds of bridges, actually. And all just slightly used

You are a liar. Why do you people lie all of the time?

Lusotec

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 8:02:13 PM2/25/11
to
Hadron wrote:
> Marti Van Lin writo:

>> Ain't it time to "defrag" your "professional" NTFS?
>>
>> "Professional" oh the irony :-D
>
> And this goes to show you dont use desktop Linux.
>
> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in
> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?

Routine checks of a 6 TiB ext4 file system take less than *one* minute. Full
checks do take hours but those are only needed if the file system is
significantly damaged.

> Yes. At system start.

At system start, and before the file systems are mounted and used, is the
right time to do the checks.

> I bet ANY professional Linux here has been caught by
> that when turning their machine on and needing a fast boot up....

Not since ext3 replaced ext2. If a ext3/4 file system was cleanly unmounted
a file system check is *very* fast. If the system wasn't cleanly unmounted,
the jornal is replayed and several other checks are done, taking less than a
minute for TiB sized file systems.

> IF they havent disabled it that is.

It is usually a *bad* idea to disable routine file system check. Data
security is far more important than a minute wait once every N mounts.

Regards.

DFS

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 8:43:19 PM2/25/11
to
On 2/25/2011 3:05 PM, Marti Van Lin wrote:

> Ubuntu GNU/Linux, which I use as my default OS, checks the integrity of
> the file system every 30 bootstraps. It /never/ defragmentates, because
> fragmentation is /no issue/ under /any/ "native" GNU/Linux supported
> file system.

You idiots are starting to believe your own lies:

=================================================================

"The filesystem is very heavily fragmented:

cu:~# xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/huge_vg/huge_lv
actual 110636, ideal 3856, fragmentation factor 96.51%"

http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0606.0/1550.html

=================================================================

"We discovered that our original ext3 /var/spool/mail filesystem was
heavily fragmented:

# fsck -f /dev/sde1
fsck 1.32 (09-Nov-2002)
e2fsck 1.32 (09-Nov-2002)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
/var/spool/mail: 4340/16777216 files (92.5% non-contiguous),
5132569/33553752 blocks"

http://www.webservertalk.com/archive202-2005-5-1037740.html

=================================================================

20% fragmentation on ext4

http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=254523

[root@fhost un]# fsck.ext4 -fvn /dev/sdb1
e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information

23195 inodes used (0.12%)
4654 non-contiguous files (20.1%)
1 non-contiguous directory (0.0%)
# of inodes with ind/dind/tind blocks: 0/0/0
Extent depth histogram: 23144/41
57591717 blocks used (73.70%)
0 bad blocks
1 large file

20611 regular files
2575 directories
0 character device files
0 block device files
0 fifos
0 links
0 symbolic links (0 fast symbolic links)
0 sockets
--------
23186 files

=================================================================

92.5% fragmented ext3

http://objectmix.com/imap/201443-huge-linux-ext3-fragmentation-var-spool-mail-using-wu-imapd%3B-seeking-filesystem-recommendation.html

=================================================================


Sinister Midget III

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 8:32:35 PM2/25/11
to
On 2011-02-25, TomB <tommy.b...@gmail.com> claimed:

> On 2011-02-25, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:

>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in


>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?
>

> Sure as hell you don't.
>
> pass-num checks for dirty filesystems and only performs a full fsck
> when needed, ie. when your disk is 'dirty'.
>
> The regular filesystem checks you are referring to are controlled by a
> setting on the filesystem itself, and can be changed with the tune2fs
> command.
>
> Neither fs check takes 'hours' to complete, and both are an integral
> part of what I call a professional system.

Now, now. Rhonda Queef was simply "advocating" linux again. Being the
"true linux advocate" s/h/it is.

--
Things working well, no problems. Time to upgrade.
Aspire One, Peppermint Ice
Friends don't let friends use Windows

Hadron

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 9:25:37 PM2/25/11
to
flatfish+++ <flat...@marianatrench.com> writes:

> On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:13:08 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
>> On 2/25/2011 2:58 PM, flatfish+++ wrote:


>>> On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:49:23 -0500, Big Steel wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/25/2011 2:41 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snipped>
>>>>
>>>> You are at work, right? What excuse do you have for being here during
>>>> working hours. Do you sneak around and go to the NG(s) when no one is
>>>> looking? I bet your neck hurts from looking around when someone comes
>>>> into your area. I bet you pretend that you are doing work. You would
>>>> never survive in an Agile project managed programming department.
>>>

>>> He probably has a netbook hidden somewhere on his janitor's cart.
>>>
>>> Hey Ahlstrom, we need another roll of tp over in stall 6 and the urinal
>>> in the men's room is overflowing again.
>>
>>
>> If he scrubs real fast, he'll have time to get a cola post in between
>> cleaning the men's and women's restrooms...
>
> I can just picture him knocking on the women's restroom door and
> yelling: "Any cunts in there?" "I'm coming in to refill the sanitary
> napkin machine".

No matter what Ahlstrom or Shearman say, that word is out of order. I
simply cant believe Chris really believes its ok to use it in polite
society. COLA piss taking aside I am sure he regrets calling people
Cunts here on a public newsgroup. Never mind then saying its ok and Women
find it acceptable. Its impossible for him to really think that. Reverse
troll? Possible. More joking in this case? I think so.

Hadron

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 9:26:40 PM2/25/11
to
An Old Friend <an....@friend.com.invalid> writes:

> Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start
>> in

>> the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you? Yes. At system
>> start. I bet ANY professional Linux here has been caught by that when
>> turning their machine on and needing a fast boot up.... IF they havent
>> disabled it
>


> Since I've been using Ubuntu, I have NEVER had any startup disk check
> take hours. I'll have to time it to be precise, but most of them don't
> seem to last even a minute long.

Thats nice. Then you dont use large SATA back up drives. I do.

Try google next time. "Me" doesnt count. Reality does.

Hadron

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 9:27:17 PM2/25/11
to
DFS <nos...@dfs.com> writes:

> On 2/25/2011 12:27 PM, Gordon wrote:
>> On 25/02/11 15:31, Arend van den Berigheid wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAH!.............. that Professionals don't use!
>>> Most "Professionals" use NTFS, you moron!
>>
>> No they don't - they use MS Office. Double moron....
>
> Added to the ever-growing list of Gortard blunders!

Amazing isn't it?

Is he another reverse troll?

sidejob scooter

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 9:28:27 PM2/25/11
to
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:21:16 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:


>
> Isn't he also the numbnuts that claimed to work with the Air Force and
> have a "Secret" clearance?


A Secret clearance? For the US military? The vetting process is much too
vigorous for the anyone like big-stool even to sweep the floors. Next
thing you know he will be telling us he is an IT proffessional.
SJS

flatfish+++

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 11:02:42 PM2/25/11
to
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:06:46 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Big Steel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>

>> On 2/25/2011 4:27 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>> All fucking day long 5 days a week you are on a break? If you work 2
>> hours a day, you are lying to your boss. They need to monitor you and
>> see just what you are doing to earn a paycheck. What's your boss's phone
>> number. Let me speak to him or her about what I see here with you not
>> doing a day's work for the company. :)
>
> Get out of my face, ankle-biter.

Posting the minute you get home Liarmutt?
Or are you hanging around the office to impress your superiors?


> No one cares what you say.

I'll bet your bosses do considering you are trolling COLA on their dime.

If I were them, I would install tracking and monitoring software and
fire your ass unless you cleaned up your act.

flatfish+++

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 11:03:18 PM2/25/11
to

He was born that way.
Much like the rest of the LIEing for LIEnux COLA vermin.

flatfish+++

unread,
Feb 25, 2011, 11:11:53 PM2/25/11
to
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:38:26 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> William Poaster wrote:
>
>> Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Chris Ahlstrom
>> on 25/2/2011 21:27 shattered the silence with:
>>
>>> Big Steel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> On 2/25/2011 2:41 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snipped>
>>>>
>>>> You are at work, right? What excuse do you have for being here during
>>>> working hours. Do you sneak around and go to the NG(s) when no one is
>>>> looking? I bet your neck hurts from looking around when someone comes
>>>> into your area. I bet you pretend that you are doing work. You would
>>>> never survive in an Agile project managed programming department.
>>>
>>> Kiss off, dude. I'm taking a fscking break.
>>>
>>> You are stupid.
>>
>> What excuse does Duh-Inane asshole have for posting during working hours?
>> After all he's claimed to be an IT professional (yeah, riiight) & have a
>> job.
>>
>
> "Had a job" would be more to the point.

We have all "had" a job at one time.
Well, all except Slimeowitz.
He's still sponging off grants.

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages