I'm freaked out about it. My Berthoud stainless fenders are okay with my 28/700 on the Romulus. When I switch to the 32s, there is barely any clearance. It takes forever to get it so it doesn't rub. The sound of small pebbles getting tossed into the fenders gives me the willies. You just know that sooner or later, a bigger pebble is gonna get up there and if, like you say, it is the front wheel, it's curtains. I finally took off the fenders. I'm saving them for the day when i can justify trading up to an AHH frame, which will accept larger tires with fenders. --- On Wed, 9/3/08, Esteban <Prot...@gmail.com> wrote: |
>
> FWIW, the last time I had a rear wheel seize up -- the attachment to
> my Nelson broke and the bag flipped backward onto the unfendered,
> un-be-racked rear wheel -- I was going close to 30 mph at the end of a
> hill. The rear wheel skidded, I stopped, re-attached the bag, and rode
> on with no more damage than a new bald spot on my rear Pasela.
You were lucky.
I knew a woman at work who had a sweater draped around her seatpost
while riding. On a fast downhill an arm of the sweater flopped down
into her back wheel, and it locked up. She went flying and broke her
arm in several places. She had three or four surgeries, was out of work
for around 9 months, and had a year or so of rehab.
She was very unlucky.
I had a rear spoke break on my commuter. It happened to be the spoke that
was holding the reflector. The reflector twisted sideways and grabbed the
fender stays while the wheel rotated and totally folded up the rear
aluminum fender. Brought the bike to a rapid halt. I'm actually still
using that fender, I just bent it back out as straight as I could get it.
I'm going to switch to those cloth/velcro refectors!
Ryan
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Michael Wise wrote:
>> Those plastic reflectors are a real hazard: they can come loose and jam in
> the forks, they can cause wheels to come out of true, they put undue stress
> on the spokes they are attached to. On top of all that, they don't solve the
> problem that they're supposed to be for: by the time a headlight is
> reflected in one of these things, the driver is probably too close to do
> anything about it.
I don't know. I've seen them from the car's point of view and they are
quite striking, even from a couple blocks away. Two bright, spinning
circles! No way you wouldn't know it's a bike.
I don't know how the velcro ones compare in brightness, though.
Ryan
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Esteban <Prot...@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't believe this would be a problem with the Berthouds.
First of all, the Berthouds are much beefier than the Honjos. They are not only stainless steel v. aluminum, they are thicker. Even the stays are much thicker than the Honjo stays. It would take something really serious to crumple them.
Just curious, do you recall what size tire you were running? --- On Wed, 9/3/08, rinjin <felt...@gmail.com> wrote: |
From: rinjin <felt...@gmail.com> |
I stand by my characterization, even though my one set of Honjos was a smooth set, they were much lighter than the Berthouds that replaced them, much more prone to denting (the hammered probably don't show dents that easily, do they? They're already dented all over), and more easily knocked out of whack by inadvertent bashing into things. The stays on the Berthouds have a more staple attachment to the fender, and they are indeed thicker.
I like SKS but have yet to find a set that fit my 700 x 60 Schwalbe
big apples on my city bike. I use SKS on my camper which is set up
for 40 max and using 35s right now.
The metal fenders are indeed difficult to install - but isn't that the
fun of it?