Discourses of Paradigm: Deconstructive socialism and Sontagist camp
Henry K. de Selby
Department of Ontology, University of Massachusetts
Catherine A. K. Buxton
Department of Gender Politics, University of Western Topeka
1. Deconstructive socialism and dialectic libertarianism
If one examines Sontagist camp, one is faced with a choice: either accept
subcultural narrative or conclude that art is part of the genre of narrativity.
The primary theme of the works of Rushdie is a mythopoetical paradox.
Therefore, Baudrillard uses the term ‘deconstructive socialism’ to denote
the economy, and thus the dialectic, of textual society. If postcultural
conceptualist theory holds, we have to choose between Sontagist camp and
pretextual Marxism.
It could be said that Lyotard suggests the use of Batailleist `powerful
communication’ to deconstruct class divisions. The characteristic theme of
Dahmus’s[1] critique of dialectic libertarianism is not
sublimation, but postsublimation.
2. Narratives of fatal flaw
“Class is unattainable,” says Lyotard; however, according to la Tournier[2] , it is not so much class that is unattainable, but rather
the futility, and some would say the genre, of class. However, Derrida promotes
the use of Sontagist camp to read and analyse sexual identity. The primary
theme of the works of Rushdie is a dialectic whole.
“Language is part of the rubicon of consciousness,” says Sartre. But
Baudrillard uses the term ‘dialectic libertarianism’ to denote the role of the
participant as observer. The premise of deconstructive socialism suggests that
discourse must come from communication, but only if dialectic libertarianism is
invalid; otherwise, academe is capable of intentionality.
Therefore, in The Moor’s Last Sigh, Rushdie reiterates deconstructive
socialism; in Satanic Verses, however, he analyses dialectic
libertarianism. A number of appropriations concerning the defining
characteristic, and therefore the absurdity, of subcultural sexual identity
exist.
It could be said that the premise of Sontagist camp states that the task of
the writer is significant form, given that language is interchangeable with
narrativity. The subject is contextualised into a semanticist discourse that
includes culture as a totality.
However, Derrida uses the term ‘Sontagist camp’ to denote the common ground
between society and sexual identity. Deconstructive socialism implies that
reality is used to exploit minorities.
Thus, the characteristic theme of Pickett’s[3] analysis
of Sontagist camp is not theory, but subtheory. Baudrillard uses the term
‘dialectic libertarianism’ to denote the dialectic of dialectic society.
1. Dahmus, I. T. ed. (1978)
Sontagist camp and deconstructive socialism. Yale University
Press
3. Pickett, O. ed. (1979) Deconstructive socialism and
Sontagist camp. Cambridge University Press
The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).
This installation of the Generator has delivered 44,138,701 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.
More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.
More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.
