On Jan 18, 1:55 am, Rupert <
rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 18, 8:05 am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> > Actual experiments that reproduce the "twin scenario" confirm the
> > predictions of SR. No matter how much idiots deny it, the fact is
> > that the "twin paradox" occurs in the world we inhabit, and SR is an
> > accurate model within its domain.”
>
> >
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/934b2a1e4839fbc4
>
> > Mathematically, the twins’ paradox is proven to be impossible in real
> > life by the very mathematics.
>
> How so?
Glad you ask.
Each resolution to the twins’ paradox comes in four stages. How long
each stage lasts depends on how tasty this resolution with its
hypnotic appetite is. The stages are:
**** Desperation
It must be very heart breaking for the Einstein Dingleberries to watch
their beloved SR getting shit canned. <shrug>
**** Hope
This is more like false hope because the Einstein Dingleberries just
cannot walk away from that pile of crap called SR. <shrug>
**** Zealot
Every day wishing for this false hope is going to trig the mind to
believe in a false resolution. It does not matter how fucked up or
stupid the resolution is. As soon as the Einstein Dingleberries sink
their teeth into this resolution, it is impossible to separate them
from SR. Waiting for rapture is very much the only mental activity
left. <shrug>
**** Awakening
After a while, the scientist in their id will be finally knocking on
their consciousness. They will start to realize just how fvcking
stupid they were with such zeal in their faith. <shrug>
**** Desperation
And the cycle begins. So, for the recap, we have gone through at
least three such cycles so far. <shrug>
**** Acceleration
This crap was first proposed by Born by equating any acceleration with
gravitational acceleration, and thus it inherits the nature of
gravitational time dilation. To this day, there is not a piece of
mathematical analysis that supports this resolution, and no single
experiment has shown acceleration manifests time dilation. <shrug>
**** Diagram
Some idiots thought the twins’ paradox can be resolved by drawing a
few lines in their so-called spacetime diagram. This resolution seems
to have the least amount of survival time. There are almost no idiots
following this cult anymore. <shrug>
**** MathemaGics
Given the time transform of the Lorentz transform, the twins’ paradox
actually involves two different set of the Lorentz transforms. The
first set describes observers 1 and 2 observing 3.
** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s23] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s13] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Where
** dt1 = time flow rate of 1
** [v12] = velocity of 2 as observed by 1
** [s13] = displacement vector of 3 as observed by 1
** All others self-explanatory
The other set of the Lorentz transform is where 1 and 2 are observing
4:
** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s24] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s14] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Since there only two observers and each observer behaving as the
observed, these two sets of the Lorentz transform above must be
reduced with 3 and 4 merged appropriately into 1 and 2. So, taking
one equation from each transform, we have
** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s23] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s14] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Then, it is easy to merge 3 into 2 and 4 into 1 from the two equations
above.
** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s22] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s11] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Or
** dt1 = dt2 / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = dt1 / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Where
** d[s11] = d[s22] = 0
Since the two equations above cannot possibly co-exist, the twins’
paradox becomes very real. However, the self-styled physicists
possess no analytical skills. In this matheMagic show, they have
demonstrated a lack of understanding in the Lorentz transform (as well
as the Galilean transform). To reduce the Lorentz transform from two
observers (1 and 2) and one observed (3 or 4) into just two observers
(1 and 2) where each observer is observing the other, they decide to
favor either 1 or 2 by using the same transform. Following through
the mathemaGics, the Lorentz transform becomes:
** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s22] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s12] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Or
** dt1 = dt2 / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = dt1 sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Where
** [v12] = - [v21]
And thus avoiding the paradox through mathemaGics.
**** Pathlength
The latest crap to the resolution of the twins’ paradox calls out for
the mythical substance called proper time. Although the scripture of
SR dealing with this proper time went back since the time of Einstein
the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar, the myth of aging in proper
time nevertheless is a modern hope of resolving the twins’ paradox.
Some self-styled physicists are beginning to realize how fucking
stupid they have been by accepting this nonsense. <shrug>
* * * * *
Each resolution to the twins’ paradox comes in four stages. How long
each stage lasts depends on how tasty this resolution with its
hypnotic appetite is. The stages are:
**** Desperation
It must be very heart breaking for the Einstein Dingleberries to watch
their beloved SR getting shit canned. <shrug>
**** Hope
This is more like false hope because the Einstein Dingleberries just
cannot walk away from that pile of crap called SR. <shrug>
**** Zealot
Every day wishing for this false hope is going to trig the mind to
believe in a false resolution. It does not matter how fucked up or
stupid the resolution is. As soon as the Einstein Dingleberries sink
their teeth into this resolution, it is impossible to separate them
from SR. Waiting for rapture is very much the only mental activity
left. <shrug>
**** Awakening
After a while, the scientist in their id will be finally knocking on
their consciousness. They will start to realize just how fvcking
stupid they were with such zeal in their faith. <shrug>
**** Desperation
And the cycle begins. So, for the recap, we have gone through at
least three such cycles so far. <shrug>
**** Acceleration
This crap was first proposed by Born by equating any acceleration with
gravitational acceleration, and thus it inherits the nature of
gravitational time dilation. To this day, there is not a piece of
mathematical analysis that supports this resolution, and no single
experiment has shown acceleration manifests time dilation. <shrug>
**** Diagram
Some idiots thought the twins’ paradox can be resolved by drawing a
few lines in their so-called spacetime diagram. This resolution seems
to have the least amount of survival time. There are almost no idiots
following this cult anymore. <shrug>
**** MathemaGics
Given the time transform of the Lorentz transform, the twins’ paradox
actually involves two different set of the Lorentz transforms. The
first set describes observers 1 and 2 observing 3.
** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s23] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s13] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Where
** dt1 = time flow rate of 1
** [v12] = velocity of 2 as observed by 1
** [s13] = displacement vector of 3 as observed by 1
** All others self-explanatory
The other set of the Lorentz transform is where 1 and 2 are observing
4:
** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s24] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s14] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Since there only two observers and each observer behaving as the
observed, these two sets of the Lorentz transform above must be
reduced with 3 and 4 merged appropriately into 1 and 2. So, taking
one equation from each transform, we have
** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s23] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s14] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Then, it is easy to merge 3 into 2 and 4 into 1 from the two equations
above.
** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s22] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s11] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Or
** dt1 = dt2 / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = dt1 / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Where
** d[s11] = d[s22] = 0
Since the two equations above cannot possibly co-exist, the twins’
paradox becomes very real. However, the self-styled physicists
possess no analytical skills. In this matheMagic show, they have
demonstrated a lack of understanding in the Lorentz transform (as well
as the Galilean transform). To reduce the Lorentz transform from two
observers (1 and 2) and one observed (3 or 4) into just two observers
(1 and 2) where each observer is observing the other, they decide to
favor either 1 or 2 by using the same transform. Following through
the mathemaGics, the Lorentz transform becomes:
** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s22] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s12] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Or
** dt1 = dt2 / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2)
And
** dt2 = dt1 sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2)
Where
** [v12] = - [v21]
And thus avoiding the paradox through mathemaGics.
**** Pathlength
The latest crap to the resolution of the twins’ paradox calls out for
the mythical substance called proper time. Although the scripture of
SR dealing with this proper time went back since the time of Einstein
the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar, the myth of aging in proper
time nevertheless is a modern hope of resolving the twins’ paradox.
Some self-styled physicists are beginning to realize how fucking
stupid they have been by accepting this nonsense. <shrug>
**** Conclusion
So, realizing all resolutions so far are just hopeless, the self-
styled physicists either ignore the twins’ paradox or go back to one
of these resolutions. Jumping from resolution to another seems not to
be getting old for these idiots. Fvcking sad, no? <shrug>
The whole episode of SR and GR can be summarized as follows.
** FAITH IS LOGIC
** LYING IS TEACHING
** NITWIT IS GENIUS
** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** FICTION IS THEORY
** PARADOX IS KOSHER
** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** BULLSHIT IS TRUTH
** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** HANDWAVING IS REASONING
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** FRAUDULENCE IS FACT
** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS
** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY
** INTERPRETATION IS VERIFICATION
<shrug>