Open Access -- A Survey for UT Faculty
<b>Please take our anonymous survey to help us gauge your interest in fostering an open access (OA) research and publishing environment at The University of Toledo.   <p><p>Please respond by <i>Friday, February 28</i>.<p><p>**Respondents may choose to submit their contact information at the end of this one-page survey for the opportunity to win one of several prizes.</b>-- The Open Access Steering Committee and University Libraries.<p>
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Which category best describes you? *
Positions may include research professors, clinical professors, lecturers, postdocs, etc.
What is your primary work location?  (College, Department, other) *
Please check more than one box only if your time is split evenly between two or more locations.
Required
PART I.   Open Access Questions.  Please give us a sense of your existing views and experience regarding open access publishing.
It's OK if you're not sure what open access (OA) publishing is.  Just answer the best you can, based on your experiences.
Your views about OA Publishing* *
Please choose the ONE statement that most closely resembles your views.
Your experiences with OA publishing *
Please check all that apply; provide further information or qualify your responses as needed.
Required
How important are the following concepts to you in general when considering a publishing venue?   *
(You can rate them all the same, if you like)
not important
somewhat important
neutral or N/A
important
very important
Publishing in the most highly ranked journals in my field
Getting my work out as quickly as possible
Making my work available to as wide a readership as possible
Publishing in the most appropriate journal for my discipline
Being published in a peer-reviewed journal
The ability to publish frequent updates to my ongoing research
How concerned are you with the following issues that you might encounter in an OA publishing environment? *
(You can rate them all the same, if you like)
not concerned
somewhat concerned
neutral or N/A
concerned
very concerned
copyright / protection of the intellectual property of my work
disclosure of data that may be time-sensitive, privileged or proprietary
permanence / stability / unambiguity of the final published version of my work
formal recognition of my work as a scholarly product (i.e., for promotion/tenure purposes)
discoverability of my work in search engines / indexes / databases / repositories
financial burden associated with OA publishing (who is responsible for covering this cost? author? institution? funding agency?)
legitimacy of intended publisher (is it really OA? is it a vanity publisher? is it a scam?)
PART II.  Institutional Repository (IR) Questions
An institutional repository (IR) collects, preserves and increases the visibility of the intellectual and creative output of a university's faculty, researchers and students.  What would you like to see an IR do at The University of Toledo?  To the best of your understanding, please indicate your opinion for the following eight (8) statements.  For IR roles/activities we have not listed, please indicate your thoughts in the general comments section at the end of this survey.  

To see what other universities are doing with their institutional repositories, please visit:  digitalcommons.bepress.com/subscriber_gallery (link will be provided again at survey completion).
1.  Archive and make freely available UT faculty research (accepted/post peer-reviewed but unpublished versions of commercially published articles; original research)
least appropriate
most appropriate
Clear selection
2. Archive and make freely available faculty work other than formal publications (e.g., unpublished papers, conference presentations, field research notes, raw data, images, etc.)
least appropriate
most appropriate
Clear selection
 3.  Serve as the archive and local backup copy for UT theses and dissertations
(which are officially published in OhioLINK (open access) and ProQuest)
least appropriate
most appropriate
Clear selection
4. Archive and make freely available graduate student non-thesis/dissertation research (projects, portfolios, capstones, etc.)
least appropriate
most appropriate
Clear selection
5. Archive and make freely available undergraduate student research
least appropriate
most appropriate
Clear selection
6.  Archive teaching materials and other departmental documents
(with limited accessibility to the public)
least appropriate
most appropriate
Clear selection
7. Serve as a publishing platform for original research at UT (any level)
least appropriate
most appropriate
Clear selection
8. Serve as a centralized expertise bank (e.g., for media or researchers seeking collaborators)
least appropriate
most appropriate
Clear selection
Please tell us more about your experiences and views overall.   What are your thoughts or concerns about open access publishing, the funding of open access publishing, or institutional repositories?
If you have NOT had experiences with OA publishing, or know nothing about OA, feel free to tell us that too!
~OPTIONAL~  Enter your contact information ONLY IF you wish to be considered for a prize drawing.
Provide your preferred email address OR phone number.  Your contact information will NOT be associated with your survey responses and will not be shared.
Thank you for taking our survey!
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy