naturerecordists archive search

Search String: [How to search]
Display: Description: Sort:

Google

Results:

References: [ AT3032: 766 ] [ AT-3032: 67 ]

Total 815 documents matching your query.

1. Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording (score: 393)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:31 +1000
..and a surprise quite a few recordists have capitalized on. Some might recall that it was Eric Benjamin who suggested and later bench tested the AT-3032's after discussion on this list about the nee
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-11/msg00230.html (10,911 bytes)

2. Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording (score: 367)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:31 +1000
To my ears the ME62 was noisier but at the same time seemed to have an extended bottom end? I presume that the K6 was phantom powered when the recording was made, as the K6 is noisier when battery po
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-11/msg00198.html (9,630 bytes)

3. Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording (score: 366)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:31 +1000
Thanks Rob, I thought you might have a copy :-)) Phil I uploaded Rich's test here as a .wav file with the left channel boosted +2dB to more closely approximate the playback level of the ME62 which is
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-11/msg00190.html (9,673 bytes)

4. Re: H6K Spike AT3032's (was AT3032's and instability in Sound Device (score: 366)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:29 +1000
Textured feedback that sounds like a motor. Exhibiting the problem on both 3032 mics at once is the unusual part. There were some, narrow emphasized bands in another 3032c pair we studied but none th
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-12/msg00162.html (8,665 bytes)

5. Re: H6K Spike AT3032's (was AT3032's and instability in Soun (score: 366)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:29 +1000
Rob, you are too kind as always and you mustn't waste your time on my poor 3032 sample. More to the point, I've just checked the traces of that musical sample and it definitely does not have the prob
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-12/msg00163.html (8,646 bytes)

6. AT-3032 body-worn rigs (was Re: Recorder / mic - Please help me deci (score: 360)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:20 +1000
Hello, I would be very interested in knowing how others have adapted the AT-3032 to convert them into body-worn rigs. Anyone around to comment on that? I have a pair of them and would like to make th
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2008-04/msg00211.html (9,216 bytes)

7. Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording (score: 355)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:31 +1000
I uploaded Rich's test here as a .wav file with the left channel boosted +2dB to more closely approximate the playback level of the ME62 which is on the right channel of the recording: http://ad2004.
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-11/msg00189.html (8,992 bytes)

8. Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording (score: 349)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:31 +1000
Hello all! I'm curious to see what anyone interested has to say about this mic comparison. The 3032 on the left seems slightly more "open" and natural to me, which came as a BIG suprise. Also, I cant
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-11/msg00197.html (8,573 bytes)

9. Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording (score: 349)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:31 +1000
Hi all, For those who own 3032s, have you use them in humid environments? Any comme= nts on how they work on "harsh" environments (heat, humidity, etc..)? Tony Celis Antonio Celis-Murillo Bird Bandin
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-11/msg00199.html (9,398 bytes)

10. Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo reco (score: 349)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:31 +1000
Hi Tony, Maybe George Paul can recap his experiences with 3032's in a humid environment. http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/message/29555 Dan Dugan mentioned a bit ago sending back o
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-11/msg00200.html (9,963 bytes)

11. Re: ME62 vs. AT-3032 (was Sennheiser MKH 418 and stereo recording (score: 349)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:31 +1000
ents I bought two and they tested great in very humid (rain soaking homemade fuzzies) conditions. I bought two more for surround. First trip out one started frying. Reproduceable in a foggy bathroom
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-11/msg00201.html (8,956 bytes)

12. Re: at3032 LF "growl" (score: 228)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:23 +1000
Ah,.. The nose-dive in frequency response your sample shows starting at 4KHz (see green line on the right most chart) https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/type/public/media/RichAT3202_PaulAT3202.jpg suggests
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2008-03/msg00019.html (19,512 bytes)

13. Re: at3032 LF "growl" (score: 217)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:23 +1000
Hi Paul Just a thought I have a pair of AT3032's which I use with a Sound Devices MixPre. I found that the MixPre became unstable when using AT3032's due to the way in which they work with phantom po
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2008-03/msg00016.html (13,435 bytes)

14. Re: at3032 LF "growl" (score: 217)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:23 +1000
Hi PhilSorry. I think I may have confused your application with the 3032's and the Mix Pre and Paul's. Phantom powering could be a factor, but Paul seems to be connecting his mics directly to the HDP
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2008-03/msg00017.html (14,502 bytes)

15. Re: at3032 LF "growl" (score: 217)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:23 +1000
Hi Rob and Phil, The recording was made in a rural setting, but there was significant breeze in the tree canopy, so that will clearly have some effect. But that does not explain what sounds like a LF
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2008-03/msg00018.html (16,499 bytes)

16. Re: AT3032 and instability in Sound Devices MixPre and 302, 442, MM- (score: 212)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:29 +1000
So far I have found that running the MixPre with the AT3032's using the 15 volt phantom power setting seems to cure the problem and there is no motorboating and I do not need to engage the 80Hz filte
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-12/msg00142.html (10,920 bytes)

17. Re: AT3032 (score: 212)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:11 +1000
try this: http://tinyurl.com/at3032 j -- Jim Lee - Bamboo Turtle Studio http://www.bambooturtle.com Home of the Rock Nest Monster http://www.bambooturtle.us/Rock_Nest_Monster.html
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2008-08/msg00190.html (10,165 bytes)

18. Re: Audio Technica AT3032 help needed. (score: 206)
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:53:22 +1000
Hi Krystian, I was looking for those microphones in every online shop in the world ... t= hey are definitley sold out. I even end up buying them in a lousy online sh= op in the United States, which i
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2011-03/msg00162.html (9,529 bytes)

19. 3. Re: AT3032 (score: 205)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:04 +1000
Hi Sean-- Curt's site has several AT-3032 recording examples, http://www.trackseventeen.com/mic_rigs.html and there are many links to 3032 recordings in the list archive, http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2008-12/msg00194.html (9,174 bytes)

20. Re: AT3032's for sale (score: 200)
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 00:53:34 +1000
Sorry Greg. They were gone after the first few minutes. I believe the AT40= 22 is the same mic at a higher price. I think when Audio-Technica realized the AT3032 was a better mic than adver= tized an
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2013-03/msg00198.html (9,079 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu