Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Anti Troll FAQ

0 views
Skip to first unread message

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 7:45:58 AM7/24/06
to
> Anti Troll FAQ.
>
>
> Subtitled
> What is a troll,
> what do they do,
> why do they do it,
> and what can one do about them?
>
> Last modified 29/9/2002
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: 1. Introduction and Intent
>
> This FAQ describes what a Troll is, what they do, what can be
> done about them, together with some suggestions as to why they do
> may it. Other FAQs on similar subjects, have not covered the
> ?philosophy? and ?organization? behind this phenomena, and have
> not covered the intent of destruction which is now evident.
>
> While every usenet user has been the victim of Trolls, very
> few have had the opportunity to study many thousand troll
> posts and look for patterns. They are therefore unaware of
> the methods used. It is important that all usenet users
> have access to as much information as possible. A person
> who has only experienced the Crosspost Trolls in a Sub
> Target newsgroup will naturally suggest inappropriate
> measures.
>
> I have only included things which the Trolls have demonstrated
> that they are well aware.
>
> This FAQ is coordinated by Dave Fawthrop
> <da...@hyphenologist.co.uk>.
>
> This FAQ is held at
> http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile. Feel free to
> incorporated the URL into sig files etc, and post in full
> to any newsgroup which has problems. All usenet posts by
> Dave Fawthrop, are PGP signed.

To continue reading, link is below:

http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm

I thought it best to post this, since there has been considerable troll
activity on c.o.l.advocacy lately.

As you read, you may begin to recognise certain tactics and patterns
provided by the trolls. I could readily identify most of the troll
activity here according to the habits described.

--
HPT

B Gruff

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 12:41:08 PM7/24/06
to
On Monday 24 July 2006 12:45 High Plains Thumper wrote:
(snip)

> To continue reading, link is below:
>
> http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
>
> I thought it best to post this, since there has been considerable troll
> activity on c.o.l.advocacy lately.
>
> As you read, you may begin to recognise certain tactics and patterns
> provided by the trolls. I could readily identify most of the troll
> activity here according to the habits described.

Surely, you are mistaken?
I read that, and I couldn't see anything that I recognise.
Try the following snippets, and then try to kid me that I'm wrong:-

--------------------------------------
The old definition of a Troll is one who posts to generate
the maximum number of follow ups.

Subject: 3.3 The destructive Troll
In about the year 1999 a new breed of Troll appeared who
have the declared intention of destroying a specific Target
newsgroup. This is done by a variety of posts, (see
Section 4) intended to drive normal posters away from the
specific newsgroup.
When the percentage of Troll posts, including followups
exceeds about 75% of the total posts, most readers seem to
just give up and unsubscribe.

Subject: 3.4 The nasty Troll
If anyone does anything which will interfere with the
troll's ability to cause mayhem, they can become very
nasty, posting from obviously incorrect variations of the
name etc. insults, call them netcops, netnannies,
homosexuals.

Subject: 3.5 The evil and illegal Troll
If anyone does anything which will interfere with the
troll's ability to cause mayhem, they also forge posts in
that persons name and internet address and libel them on
usenet. Both these are illegal.

Subject: 4.2 The crosspost Troll
This is perhaps the most effective Troll in that it
produces large numbers of posts with little effort from the
Troll.

Subject: 4.4 General nastiness
The Target newsgroup is flooded with nastiness, name
calling and swearing, and flame wars, mostly between
themselves. This can be a great off put to new
subscribers.

Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.
Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious
personal attacks throughout usenet.
As will be seen several of these are libelous, and
thus illegal

Subject: 4.6 Forgeries
They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do
not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of
their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the
average reader would not be able to detect.

Subject: 4.7 Setting X-No-Archive: Yes
There are several usenet archive sites where posts are kept
for ever. If one is doing something underhand, illegal, or
very nasty, it is an advantage to do the dirty deed, create
mayhem, and then let all evidence disappear when the servers
delete the posts when they are 7 days old or whatever limit
is set on that server.
When combined with other practises in this section X-
No-Archive: Yes can be particularly damaging.
-------------------
Blimey - I'm glad we don't have any of all that here!

Roy Culley

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 12:48:13 PM7/24/06
to
begin risky.vbs
<4ikbh4F...@individual.net>,

B Gruff <bbg...@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> On Monday 24 July 2006 12:45 High Plains Thumper wrote:
> (snip)
>> To continue reading, link is below:
>
> [snip]

>
> Blimey - I'm glad we don't have any of all that here!

:-)

--
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as
false, and by rulers as useful." -- Seneca the Younger (4? BC - 65 AD)

Roy Schestowitz

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 12:50:09 PM7/24/06
to
__/ [ B Gruff ] on Monday 24 July 2006 17:41 \__

> On Monday 24 July 2006 12:45 High Plains Thumper wrote:
> (snip)
>> To continue reading, link is below:
>>
>> http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
>>
>> I thought it best to post this, since there has been considerable troll
>> activity on c.o.l.advocacy lately.
>>
>> As you read, you may begin to recognise certain tactics and patterns
>> provided by the trolls. I could readily identify most of the troll
>> activity here according to the habits described.
>
> Surely, you are mistaken?
> I read that, and I couldn't see anything that I recognise.
> Try the following snippets, and then try to kid me that I'm wrong:-
>
> --------------------------------------
> The old definition of a Troll is one who posts to generate
> the maximum number of follow ups.
>
> Subject: 3.3 The destructive Troll
> In about the year 1999 a new breed of Troll appeared who
> have the declared intention of destroying a specific Target
> newsgroup. This is done by a variety of posts, (see
> Section 4) intended to drive normal posters away from the
> specific newsgroup.
> When the percentage of Troll posts, including followups
> exceeds about 75% of the total posts, most readers seem to
> just give up and unsubscribe.

> <snip />


> -------------------
> Blimey - I'm glad we don't have any of all that here!

Personally, I always go by the definition once provided by Wikipedia. The
definition changes (or evolves) constantly, like symshifting. Here is how it
stands at present.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

,----[ Overvie ]
| In Internet terminology, a troll is someone who comes into an
| established community such as an online discussion forum, and posts
| inflammatory, rude, repetitive or offensive messages designed
| intentionally to annoy and antagonize the existing members or
| disrupt the flow of discussion, including the personal attack of
| calling others trolls.
`----

This pretty much describes the behaviour embraced, too. The previous
definition (as I once saw it) was more succinct and punctual. Anything that
/upsets/ (to use the word that stood out) the participants can be viewed as
an act of trolling. It's community vandalism.

Best wishes,

Roy


--
Roy S. Schestowitz | "World ends in five minutes - please log out"
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE GNU/Linux Åš PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
run-level 5 Jul 20 12:15 last=S
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine

B Gruff

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 1:52:39 PM7/24/06
to
On Monday 24 July 2006 17:48 Roy Culley wrote:

> begin risky.vbs
> <4ikbh4F...@individual.net>,
> B Gruff <bbg...@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
>> On Monday 24 July 2006 12:45 High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> (snip)
>>> To continue reading, link is below:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Blimey - I'm glad we don't have any of all that here!

:-)

Seriously, Roy:-


"When the percentage of Troll posts, including followups
exceeds about 75% of the total posts, most readers seem to
just give up and unsubscribe"

That is most likely true?
Certainly I sense that it is, and I reckon that Our Friends sense it too.
Previously, I had thought that the only way was to persuade people *not* to
respond to trolls.
Roy S. has shown us the other way - for a better signal to noise ratio, if
you can't cut down the noise, put *up* the signal!
Now you see why they hate him....:-)

Oliver Wong

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 2:03:50 PM7/24/06
to

"Roy Schestowitz" <newsg...@schestowitz.com> wrote in message
news:1300002.N...@schestowitz.com...

>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
>
> ,----[ Overvie ]
> | In Internet terminology, a troll is someone who comes into an
> | established community such as an online discussion forum, and posts
> | inflammatory, rude, repetitive or offensive messages designed
> | intentionally to annoy and antagonize the existing members or
> | disrupt the flow of discussion, including the personal attack of
> | calling others trolls.
> `----
>
> This pretty much describes the behaviour embraced, too. The previous
> definition (as I once saw it) was more succinct and punctual. Anything
> that
> /upsets/ (to use the word that stood out) the participants can be viewed
> as
> an act of trolling. It's community vandalism.

If someone makes a post that upsets the participant, but it was not the
intent of the poster to upset anyone, is it still an act of trolling? And is
that poster considered a troll?

The base question is, how big a role does intent play into this, and
philosophically, how do you measure intent, or pragmatically, how can you
measure your own confidence in guessing someone else's intent?

- Oliver

Message has been deleted

Bobbie

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 2:44:14 PM7/24/06
to

Why does a certain ".p.jm" from reeky come to mind?

--
Bobbie the Triple Killer
http://members.shaw.ca/bobbie4/index.htm

email Bobbie @ bobbie4R...@shaw.ca
remember to 'remove this'

Bobbie recently switched to Ubuntu 6.
Why? Cause he can, that's why.


Roy Schestowitz

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 2:43:18 PM7/24/06
to
__/ [ Oliver Wong ] on Monday 24 July 2006 19:03 \__

>
> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsg...@schestowitz.com> wrote in message
> news:1300002.N...@schestowitz.com...
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
>>
>> ,----[ Overvie ]
>> | In Internet terminology, a troll is someone who comes into an
>> | established community such as an online discussion forum, and posts
>> | inflammatory, rude, repetitive or offensive messages designed
>> | intentionally to annoy and antagonize the existing members or
>> | disrupt the flow of discussion, including the personal attack of
>> | calling others trolls.
>> `----
>>
>> This pretty much describes the behaviour embraced, too. The previous
>> definition (as I once saw it) was more succinct and punctual. Anything
>> that
>> /upsets/ (to use the word that stood out) the participants can be viewed
>> as
>> an act of trolling. It's community vandalism.
>
> If someone makes a post that upsets the participant, but it was not the
> intent of the poster to upset anyone, is it still an act of trolling? And
> is that poster considered a troll?


That's a very good point. I didn't think about it. Especially in textual
forums, there is often place for ambiguity, which could offend someone.


> The base question is, how big a role does intent play into this, and
> philosophically, how do you measure intent, or pragmatically, how can you
> measure your own confidence in guessing someone else's intent?


When it recurs dozens or hundreds or time (despite warnings and evidence
through reactions), then it's rather transparent. The troll soon meets all
criteria.

Message has been deleted

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 3:25:32 PM7/24/06
to
Oliver Wong wrote:
> "Roy Schestowitz" wrote...

>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
>>
>> ,----[ Overvie ]
>> | In Internet terminology, a troll is someone who comes into an
>> | established community such as an online discussion forum, and posts
>> | inflammatory, rude, repetitive or offensive messages designed
>> | intentionally to annoy and antagonize the existing members or
>> | disrupt the flow of discussion, including the personal attack of
>> | calling others trolls.
>> `----
>>
>> This pretty much describes the behaviour embraced, too. The previous
>> definition (as I once saw it) was more succinct and punctual. Anything
>> that /upsets/ (to use the word that stood out) the participants can be
>> viewed as an act of trolling. It's community vandalism.
>
> If someone makes a post that upsets the participant, but it was not the
> intent of the poster to upset anyone, is it still an act of trolling? And
> is that poster considered a troll?

No, it is in reference to deliberate, willful, intentional act.

> The base question is, how big a role does intent play into this, and
> philosophically, how do you measure intent, or pragmatically, how can you
> measure your own confidence in guessing someone else's intent?

????

--
HPT

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 4:06:08 PM7/24/06
to
Bobbie wrote:

> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> To continue reading, link is below:
>>
>> http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
>>
>> I thought it best to post this, since there has been considerable troll
>> activity on c.o.l.advocacy lately.
>>
>> As you read, you may begin to recognise certain tactics and patterns
>> provided by the trolls. I could readily identify most of the troll
>> activity here according to the habits described.
>
> Why does a certain ".p.jm" from reeky come to mind?

I haven't paid much attention to .p.jm. Classic example is Henry Hanstein
and his posts on the war in Iraq, which has nothing to do with motorcycling
and is not within interest of most of the posting community. He and a few
other off-topic posters like arminius is the reason why I no longer
frequent rec.motorcycles.

A good example of a truly off-topic poster is deuteros, who has crossposted
COLA with 8 other NG's. Like Henry, he uses crossposts to increase the
number of responses. In new thread subject "State uses Patriot Act to view
private Facebook profiles" dated 18 July 2006, he crossposted to
alt.politics.usa.republican, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.abortion,
alt.world, alt.politics.libertarian, alt.atheism, comp.os.linux.advocacy,
talk.politics.guns and us.military.army.

This has nothing to do with advocacy or even computers in general.

--
HPT

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 4:34:39 PM7/24/06
to
> From: flatfish+++ <flat...@linuxmail.org>
> Subject: Re: Anti Troll FAQ
> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
> References: <ea2btg$htr$1...@nntp.aioe.org> <4ikbh4F...@individual.net>
<1300002.N...@schestowitz.com> <aY7xg.149774$S61.78289@edtnps90>
> X-No-Archive: yes

<SNIP>

> The bottom line is, intent never factors into it at all.
>
> Post a "I had problems with Linux" message and you will kick off the
> feeding frenzy.
>
> Post a "I love Linux" message and no matter what you say, no matter how
> many false conclusions you have reached, no matter how little proof you
> have given to back up your statements, you will be accepted into the fold
> and the "atta boy" posts will flood like honey from a hive.
>
> That's COLA in a NUTshell.

http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm

> Subject: 4.7 Setting X-No-Archive: Yes
> There are several usenet archive sites where posts are kept
> for ever. If one is doing something underhand, illegal, or
> very nasty, it is an advantage to do the dirty deed, create
> mayhem, and then let all evidence disappear when the servers
> delete the posts when they are 7 days old or whatever limit
> is set on that server.
> When combined with other practises in this section X-
> No-Archive: Yes can be particularly damaging.

--
HPT

Roy Culley

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 6:35:22 PM7/24/06
to
begin risky.vbs
<4ikfn8F...@individual.net>,

I agree with you. The Roy S. affect has been quite amazing. Erik is
just utterly pathetic and reduced to a laughing stock.

Sinister Midget

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 11:26:15 PM7/24/06
to
On 2006-07-24, Roy Culley <r...@nodomain.none> posted something concerning:

I disagree. Erik was *already* utterly pathetic and a laughing stock.
What he's turned into (thanks to Roy) is a whiny, sniveling crybaby in
a gaggle of whiny sniveling crybaby trolls.

These days he can't get a (FUD) word in edgewise most of the time.
Every time he manages get anything at all in, it's usually another page
from his Personal Vendetta Handbook, Chapter Roy.

--
Windows: In what position would you like to be taken today?

Bobbie

unread,
Jul 24, 2006, 11:53:09 PM7/24/06
to
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:26:15 +0000, Sinister Midget wrote:


> These days he can't get a (FUD) word in edgewise most of the time.
> Every time he manages get anything at all in, it's usually another page
> from his Personal Vendetta Handbook, Chapter Roy.

COMING SOON to a newsgroup near you:

E for Vendetta

In this movie the premise is that 'E' tries to discredit the OSS community
in order to win favour with his handlers back at the mother ship Microsoft.
To help in his endeavours are his two trusty sidekicks DFS and
++flatfish.

les.c...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 12:31:58 AM7/25/06
to

High Plains Thumper wrote:
> I haven't paid much attention to .p.jm. Classic example is Henry Hanstein
> and his posts on the war in Iraq, which has nothing to do with motorcycling
> and is not within interest of most of the posting community. He and a few
> other off-topic posters like arminius is the reason why I no longer
> frequent rec.motorcycles.

Wrong Thumper girl.
The reason you don't post to rec.motorcycles anymore is because we
drummed you out of the group for being a bone smoking faggot. It was
bad enough when you started looking for riding buddies, but when you
started emailing people asking them if they were tops or bottoms it got
to be too much.
The short of it is you were run out of rec.motorcycles for being a bone
smoking homosexual. Kinda gives a hole new meaning to the term thumper
now doesn't it.
It has nothing to do with small engines now does it thumper?

Tom McDonald

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 12:42:00 AM7/25/06
to

So you're a bottom, then.

Bobbie

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 12:42:26 AM7/25/06
to
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:31:58 -0700, les.crippen wrote:

>
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> I haven't paid much attention to .p.jm. Classic example is Henry Hanstein
>> and his posts on the war in Iraq, which has nothing to do with motorcycling
>> and is not within interest of most of the posting community. He and a few
>> other off-topic posters like arminius is the reason why I no longer
>> frequent rec.motorcycles.
>
>


Cross post crap fixed.

Oh no HPT !!, the big bad man used sexual slurs while hiding behind a
yahoo account.

Stupendous Man

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 12:46:54 AM7/25/06
to

> So you're a bottom, then.
>

Definately a bitch


Message has been deleted

Bobbie

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 12:56:47 AM7/25/06
to
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:51:52 -0400, flatfish+++ wrote:

> I dunno, but anyone with a moniker like "High Plains Thumper" has got to
> pique a person's curiosity.
>
> High Plains Drifter was Clint Eastwood.
> Clint is kool.
>
> High Plains Thumper?
>
> Sounds like a *poof* to me.

Yeah flatty you'd know all about *poofters* wouldn't you.

Message has been deleted

Klaus

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 1:38:24 AM7/25/06
to

A thumper is not a small engine! It is a motorcycle engine with a large
single cylinder, usually 650 CC.
Klaus

P.Roehling

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 1:52:06 AM7/25/06
to

<les.c...@yahoo.com> wrote

> Wrong Thumper girl.
> The reason you don't post to rec.motorcycles anymore is because we
> drummed you out of the group for being a bone smoking faggot.

As it happens, we have several openly gay contributers to Reeky. Everybody
knows. Nobody cares.

Grow up.


dysfunction

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 2:14:48 AM7/25/06
to

Why the HELL is this xposted to t.o. anyway?

chris.li...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 2:29:21 AM7/25/06
to

My guess is that it's the Jabbertroll trying to stir things up.

Ignore him.

Chris

nes...@wigner.berkeley.edu

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 3:33:17 AM7/25/06
to
When I first read your post, I thought, that's not a problem
practically speaking, because you can tell what someone's intent is
after you get to know their posting habits. Then I realized that you
were speaking of your own experience. It's definitely true you can be
misunderstood (and flamed etc) on a few posts. However, I think intent
does become clear with a larger picture. So do other personality
characteristics, for example, whether the poster makes vicious personal
attacks (some of which are illegal, as I learn by reading the original
post). There are also plenty of anonymous posts on cola, I mean hordes
of names with no posting history that pop up out of nowhere and do
trolling duty. I've never seen even one of these coming from a
pro-Linux point of view. Many people on the ng attribute those posts
to flatfish. That can't be proven, but there is no doubt that this ng
is subject to trolling abuse from anti-Linux people, by the definitions
of the original post.

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 8:56:29 AM7/25/06
to
les.c...@yahoo.com wrote:

Ah, a classic specimen for the Anti Troll Laboratory. Let us dig into this
cadaver.

During autopsy, see the crossposts?

> comp.os.linux.advocacy, rec.motorcycles, alt.religion.christian-teen,
> talk.origins

Time to break out the medical references:

http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm

> Subject: 4.2 The crosspost Troll
>
> This is perhaps the most effective Troll in that it
> produces large numbers of posts with little effort from the
> Troll. An inflammatory post is made to a group of Sub
> Target newsgroups, say cooking, politics or guns. The
> Target Newsgroup is included in the ng list. The innocent
> posters to the Sub Target newsgroup continue to discuss
> this in the normal way without noticing that the posts are
> also going to the Target Newsgroup.

Digging further into the head(er):

> NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
> X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1153802135 95870 128.100.83.246 (25 Jul 2006
> 04:35:35 GMT)

Follow this bit of decaying brain matter:

http://www.ediacara.org/fac03.html

We find the following interesting signs:

> University of Ediacara
> The Virtual University's Virtual Home

> Chair University Sexual Discrimination Committee.
> Applied interspecific lateral transfer of feline behavioral
> characteristics - "look what the cat dragged in" syndrome.

Yep, a truthful statement if I ever saw one, observe, "look what the cat
dragged in".

Tracing IP 128.100.83.246, PTR record: mungo.med.utoronto.ca.

Ah, cadaver and University of Toronto have something in common.

Perhaps not, addy may be spoofed to lead one to think it is Toronto.
However, that would imply a deeper sense of intelligence, which apparently
this cadaver did not have, as evidenced by the use of virtual instead of a
real university. As some would say, "Dumb as a stump".

Hmm, perhaps a relationship with next paragraph?

> Subject: 3.6 How they are organised
>
> They use private listservers to communicate between
> themselves. An archive of one such listserver is at
> http://www.uklocaltrolls.fs2.com. For less important
> communications, they use Troll Communications newsgroup(s).
>
> The listserver must have an owner(s) who can approve or
> deny access. Other than that anarchy reigns where each
> member does what he/she thinks fit. Thus because no leader
> or committee exists coordination with the group is
> impossible. Any agreement reached with one or more can
> instantly be abrogated by others.
>
> Coordinated action can occur where it forwards their
> general aims.

Let's now examine the body. We see:

> "girl", bone smoking faggot", "tops or bottoms", "bone smoking
> homosexual", and a fantasy with the term "thumper".

According to the medical journal:

> Subject: 3.4 The nasty Troll
>
> If anyone does anything which will interfere with the
> troll's ability to cause mayhem, they can become very
> nasty, posting from obviously incorrect variations of the
> name etc. insults, call them netcops, netnannies,
> homosexuals.

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.
>
> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious
> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "fucks
> animals!" "is a cannibal" "is a hermaphrodite!" "is a
> molester of boys" "in panties gets fucked up the arse" "is
> a Nazi!" "is a cocksucking queer" "is a hermaphrodite just
> like Maryanne Kehoe" "molests boys on American Airlines"
> "Sexually harassed by" "is an anthrax pervert" "AT GAY
> PARTY" "sucks his father's cock" "is a pervert" "hated
> wherever he goes!" "White Racist" "Usenet spammer!" "Usenet
> k00k!" "I hope you die SOON".

Oh, silly me. I smell fish. However with a dead, non-speaking corpse, it
will be a hard tell. Dead morons don't talk.

--
HPT

The Ghost In The Machine

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 9:00:02 AM7/25/06
to
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Bobbie
<bobbie4R...@shaw.ca>
wrote
on Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:53:09 GMT
<pan.2006.07.25...@shaw.ca>:

> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:26:15 +0000, Sinister Midget wrote:
>
>
>> These days he can't get a (FUD) word in edgewise most of the time.
>> Every time he manages get anything at all in, it's usually another page
>> from his Personal Vendetta Handbook, Chapter Roy.
>
> COMING SOON to a newsgroup near you:
>
> E for Vendetta
>
> In this movie the premise is that 'E' tries to discredit the OSS community
> in order to win favour with his handlers back at the mother ship Microsoft.
> To help in his endeavours are his two trusty sidekicks DFS and
> ++flatfish.
>

FSVO "help". :-)

--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Windows Vista. Because it's time to refresh your hardware. Trust us.

Kier

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 10:09:24 AM7/25/06
to
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:02:02 -0400, flatfish+++ wrote:

>>> Sounds like a *poof* to me.
>>
>> Yeah flatty you'd know all about *poofters* wouldn't you.
>
>
> Having grown up in NYC I sure know one when I see one.

Homophobic prick. How much lower are you going to sink, flatty, and still
whine about how bad *we* all are?

--
Kier

Mark Kent

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 11:21:43 AM7/25/06
to
begin oe_protect.scr
Roy Schestowitz <newsg...@schestowitz.com> espoused:

> __/ [ Oliver Wong ] on Monday 24 July 2006 19:03 \__
>
>>
>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsg...@schestowitz.com> wrote in message
>> news:1300002.N...@schestowitz.com...
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
>>>
>>> ,----[ Overvie ]
>>> | In Internet terminology, a troll is someone who comes into an
>>> | established community such as an online discussion forum, and posts
>>> | inflammatory, rude, repetitive or offensive messages designed
>>> | intentionally to annoy and antagonize the existing members or
>>> | disrupt the flow of discussion, including the personal attack of
>>> | calling others trolls.
>>> `----
>>>
>>> This pretty much describes the behaviour embraced, too. The previous
>>> definition (as I once saw it) was more succinct and punctual. Anything
>>> that
>>> /upsets/ (to use the word that stood out) the participants can be viewed
>>> as
>>> an act of trolling. It's community vandalism.
>>
>> If someone makes a post that upsets the participant, but it was not the
>> intent of the poster to upset anyone, is it still an act of trolling? And
>> is that poster considered a troll?
>
>
> That's a very good point. I didn't think about it. Especially in textual
> forums, there is often place for ambiguity, which could offend someone.
>

It's generally clear when you see repeated behaviour. Most people will
accept one or two mistakes, but when someone has been repeatedly
corrected and continues to show the same behaviour, then it's clear that
it's intentional, thus they are a troll.

>
>> The base question is, how big a role does intent play into this, and
>> philosophically, how do you measure intent, or pragmatically, how can you
>> measure your own confidence in guessing someone else's intent?
>
>
> When it recurs dozens or hundreds or time (despite warnings and evidence
> through reactions), then it's rather transparent. The troll soon meets all
> criteria.

Exactement!

--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
What no spouse of a writer can ever understand is that a writer is working
when he's staring out the window.

Mark Kent

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 11:20:06 AM7/25/06
to
begin oe_protect.scr
Bobbie <bobbie4R...@shaw.ca> espoused:

> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:26:15 +0000, Sinister Midget wrote:
>
>
>> These days he can't get a (FUD) word in edgewise most of the time.
>> Every time he manages get anything at all in, it's usually another page
>> from his Personal Vendetta Handbook, Chapter Roy.
>
> COMING SOON to a newsgroup near you:
>
> E for Vendetta
>
> In this movie the premise is that 'E' tries to discredit the OSS community
> in order to win favour with his handlers back at the mother ship Microsoft.
> To help in his endeavours are his two trusty sidekicks DFS and
> ++flatfish.
>

... DFS and flatfish and 100 nyms...

Thumper

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 11:38:58 AM7/25/06
to

"P.Roehling" <Pete.R...@CUTOUTeee.org> wrote in message
news:12cbcc8...@corp.supernews.com...

Get lost.


--

"Of course, you'll have the good taste not to mention that I posted this."

Thumper

"I don't want a pickle..."
http://www.thumpers-brithouse.com

2004 H-D Road King Classic
2002 BMW R1150RT "Kit"
1996 Honda Shadow VLR 600
1978 Triumph Bonneville
1975 Triumph Trident
1974 Norton Interstate
1969 BSA Red Rocket III
1962 Triumph Tiger Cub
1958 BSA Super Bantam COCK
1954 Velocette MAC

Message has been deleted

P.Roehling

unread,
Jul 25, 2006, 7:54:00 PM7/25/06
to

"Thumper" <road...@unclewebster.com> wrote

> Get lost.

?


High Plains Thumper

unread,
Jul 26, 2006, 12:22:13 AM7/26/06
to
Aunty Diluvian wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:45:58 +0900, High Plains Thumper
> <h...@singlecylinderbikes.com> wrote:
>
>>> Anti Troll FAQ.
>>>
>>>
>>> Subtitled
>>> What is a troll,
>
> Someone that doesan't believe your lies no matter how many times
> nor how adamantly you tell them.
>
>>> what do they do,
>
> Advocate something different than you.
>
>>> why do they do it,
>
> They are tired of hearing and seeing your lies go un-challenged.
>
>>> and what can one do about them?
>
> Turn off your computer and go play with your Barbie dolls.
>
>>> how can you be happy again
>
> Stop lieing to yourself and everyone else, make a clean breast of it
> and move back to a non-hobbyist OS.
>
>>> what can you do about the stains on your carpet
>
> Leave your boring Lienox terminal more often.
> Nothing's going to happen there anyway.

Blimey! A troll replying to an anti-troll article!

--
HPT

--
HPT

Roy Schestowitz

unread,
Jul 26, 2006, 5:11:16 AM7/26/06
to
__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Tuesday 25 July 2006 16:20 \__

> begin oe_protect.scr
> Bobbie <bobbie4R...@shaw.ca> espoused:
>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:26:15 +0000, Sinister Midget wrote:
>>
>>
>>> These days he can't get a (FUD) word in edgewise most of the time.
>>> Every time he manages get anything at all in, it's usually another page
>>> from his Personal Vendetta Handbook, Chapter Roy.
>>
>> COMING SOON to a newsgroup near you:
>>
>> E for Vendetta
>>
>> In this movie the premise is that 'E' tries to discredit the OSS community
>> in order to win favour with his handlers back at the mother ship
>> Microsoft. To help in his endeavours are his two trusty sidekicks DFS and
>> ++flatfish.
>>
>
> ... DFS and flatfish and 100 nyms...

*LMAO*

William Poaster

unread,
Jul 26, 2006, 7:47:35 AM7/26/06
to
It was on Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:22:13 +0900, that High Plains Thumper wrote:

> Aunty Diluvian wrote:

Snip>



>> Leave your boring Lienox terminal more often.
>> Nothing's going to happen there anyway.
>
> Blimey! A troll replying to an anti-troll article!

Although that troll can't spell worth a shit, he's right about nothing
happening & being boring! After all, we *linux users* don't have
to constantly be on the lookout for malware, spyware etc, we don't have to
worry about our browsers being hijacked, nor do we have to keep defragging
our hard drives to keep the OS running smoothly, we don't have to worry
about any sudden reboots because our OS decided to update itself.

Who'd a thunk it, a wintroll advocating linux! <grin>

--
98% of linux problems *windows* users whine about,
emanate from somewhere between the chair and the PC.
Either the person cannot read, doesn't understand
what they read, or they can't be bothered.

0 new messages