Apple removes $1,000 featureless iPhone application
(Post updated at 1:04 p.m. with Heinrich's response about the validity of the negative review.)
(Post updated at 8:45 a.m. with response from Heinrich about compensation from Apple.)
Eight iPhone owners have joined an elite clan: Their Apple gadget is running a program that cost nearly $1,000.
When the iPhone first hit the market in June 2007, those who paid the $499 entry price -- and signed the two-year AT&T contract -- owned a status symbol. A year later, we have the iPhone 3G, Apple's speedier, sleeker and, most important, less expensive smart phone, which introduced a section for downloading third-party applications. Now that the phone is affordable enough for a wider audience, a new status symbol has emerged: a seemingly useless application called I Am Rich.
Its function is exactly what the name implies: to alert people that you have money in the bank. I Am Rich was available for purchase from the phone's App Store for, get this, $999.99 -- the highest amount a developer can charge through the digital retailer, said Armin Heinrich, the program's developer. Once downloaded, it doesn't do much -- a red icon sits on the iPhone home screen like any other application, with the subtext "I Am Rich." Once activated, it treats the user to a large, glowing gem (pictured above). That's about it. For a thousand dollars.
Apple apparently had some problems with I Am Rich. After initially approving it for distribution, the company has since removed it from the store. Heinrich, a German software developer, has yet to hear back from Apple concerning the removal. "I have no idea why they did it and am not aware of any violation of the rules to sell software on the App Store," Heinrich said in an e-mail with The Times today.
But Apple couldn't pull it down before curious aristocrats -- eight of them -- had purchased it. Six people from the United States, one from Germany and one from France dropped a grand for the gem in the first 24 hours it was available, Heinrich said. That's $5,600 in revenue for Heinrich and $2,400 for Apple, which collects 30% of each sale for "store upkeep."
In the e-mail, Heinrich said there seemed to be a market for the program. "I am sure a lot more people would like to buy it -- but currently can't do so," Heinrich said. "The App is a work of Art and included a 'secret mantra' -- that's all."
A possible explanation for its removal: A screen shot of an App Store review that has been circulating around the Web recently, showing a user's complaint that he purchased it accidentally. "I saw this app with a few friends and we jokingly clicked 'buy' thinking it was a joke, to see what would happen. ... THIS IS NO JOKE...DO NOT BUY THIS APP AND APPLE PLEASE REMOVE THIS FROM THE APP STORE," it read.
I Am Rich isn't the first software that has been removed from Apple's store. Box Office, a movie showtime resource, and NetShare, which let users connect a computer to the Internet using the iPhone's 3G wireless data service, disappeared without a trace. Apple did not respond to phone calls for comment.
UPDATED: In a follow-up e-mail, Heinrich said he had not yet received his $5,600 check from Apple, which has a policy of paying developers at the end of each calendar month. He's unsure how the app's removal will affect the payment process.
"I've got e-mails from customers telling me that they really love the app," adding that they had "no trouble spending the money," he said.
UPDATED: Heinrich confirms the validity of the review pictured in the screenshot, and Apple has refunded his and another buyer's money. "I don't want to collect money from people who did this by accident and I am glad that Apple returned the money for two orders," Heinrich said.
-- Mark Milian
Milian is an intern at latimes.com.
Images courtesy of Armin Heinrich

please tell me this is a joke. people are such a-holes
Posted by: oldcrone | August 07, 2008 at 07:46 PM
I am convinced the whole world is on dope.
Posted by: Mr. Hand | August 07, 2008 at 07:52 PM
mac users are stupid, point proven
Posted by: | August 07, 2008 at 08:07 PM
If everyone who wants this application sends me $999.99 instead, I will be rich, and your money will be better spent, signed, your nearby local Children's Hospital
Posted by: Not Impressed | August 07, 2008 at 08:16 PM
And to think people say the Germans have no sense of humor......
Posted by: amuzed | August 07, 2008 at 08:23 PM
| yes you are right lol agree with you
Posted by: AntiApple | August 07, 2008 at 08:34 PM
Ah man, I was going to buy it. Where did it Go? LOL
JT
www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com
Posted by: Jim McDosh | August 07, 2008 at 08:36 PM
you still have to type in your iTunes password before purchasing, so it's extremely unlikely anyone purchased it accidentally with a swipe.
Posted by: BS | August 07, 2008 at 08:40 PM
I don't think there is a problem with this application at all.. so what its a grand... if you can't afford it don't buy it... and don't click buy because you think its a joke... like apple has time for that kind of crap???
Stupid People...
Apple I hope you keep this app up and I hope you make lots more money from it..
Posted by: Briana Smith | August 07, 2008 at 08:51 PM
What is this "I bought is as a joke"? Why would it be a joke? How are you risking a grand on a joke?
Posted by: Hypercrypt | August 07, 2008 at 08:53 PM
"I am convinced the whole world is on dope."
Out of a sample of several million iPhone owners, eight of them were stupid enough to blow a grand on a useless "product".
Doesn't exactly fill me with dread for the future of our species.
-jcr
Posted by: John C. Randolph | August 07, 2008 at 09:03 PM
So ridicoulous. And that's money!
Posted by: Dragos | August 07, 2008 at 09:22 PM
"mac users are stupid, point proven"
not only mac users use the iphone
i use a macbook and i do not have an iphone
don't be such a small minded fool
Posted by: erik Parker | August 07, 2008 at 09:24 PM
What right does Apple have to remove the app if it wasn't violating any of their terms? Just because it's a bit silly and there are sillier people willing to part with $1000 for the app doesn't mean anything. And we shouldn't judge either. Who really cares? Who needs protecting from their own stupidity by a company like Apple? Do you?
Posted by: Nick | August 07, 2008 at 09:24 PM
"mac users are stupid, point proven"
umm...where is the evidence that the people who bought this are mac users? ignoring the sweeping generalization, all 8 of them could easily be windows users for all you know. remember, the iphone is not a mac-only device.
Posted by: Matt Moriarity | August 07, 2008 at 09:28 PM
As said on other sites, this developer is smart and created an app that im sure most people wish they had thought of and implemented. He made his money but it would of had better reviews if the developer gave half or more away to charity. If it was sold that way then it makes your phone have the status symbol and it has a good meaning behind it aswell.
Posted by: James | August 07, 2008 at 09:33 PM
well the IQ required to spend uber-$ on a mobile phone in the first place can't be much higher than required to buy a useless app for $999.99
iphone user avg IQ = 50
iphone user with 'I am rich' app = Paris Hilton
Posted by: gaspah | August 07, 2008 at 09:35 PM
Some idiot buys it with "one click" and tries to blame apple and the writer. Take responsibility for your actions and don't buy it if you don't want it.
It's a great work of art. My guess is it will increase in value and was a bargain at 999.99.
Posted by: Nik | August 07, 2008 at 09:44 PM
"mac users are stupid, point proven"
How do you know that the eight people who bought the app were Mac-users? Most iTunes-users use it on Windows, and the iPhone works just fine with Windows.
Posted by: Janne | August 07, 2008 at 09:55 PM
"mac users are stupid, point proven"
Not all iPhone & iPod/iTunes users are Mac users, genius. So, the only point proven is that you're a Windows user, you're not very bright & quite bitter about something you don't have the slightest clue about.
Posted by: Legs | August 07, 2008 at 10:07 PM
Matt Moriarity, you're completely right.
Posted by: Legs | August 07, 2008 at 10:09 PM
"It's a great work of art. My guess is it will increase in value and was a bargain at 999.99."
Are you fu**ing kidding me.. you mor*n
Posted by: mike | August 07, 2008 at 10:11 PM
you realise that using an iphone makes you a mac user, so you can all stfu
irly !!
Posted by: aixsir | August 07, 2008 at 10:36 PM
I think someone should develop the "I am poor application" and post it in the free section. I'm not sure what it should look like though. Maybe a budweiser beer can or a plain label beer bottle? Maybe, just some dirt.
Posted by: Aaron The Young | August 07, 2008 at 10:54 PM
For serial though. Those 8 people bought something useless as a status symbol and now those 8 people are the only in the world to have it. Just got a lot bigger of a status symbol than they expected/paid for.
Posted by: M.Free | August 07, 2008 at 10:55 PM
"umm...where is the evidence that the people who bought this are mac users?"
Read the original story. "I forgot my wife had iclick activated"
Posted by: Stupid Mac User | August 07, 2008 at 11:08 PM
8 individuals bought 'I am Rich before Apple pulled it off from the App Store. Todays article of latimes.com reports comments from the developer. Also read Our Most Useless App Ever post HERE. Apple apparently had some problems with I Am Rich. After initially approving it for distribution, the
Posted by: iPhone App Store: 1000 dollar App was sold 8 times | August 07, 2008 at 11:23 PM
"you realise that using an iphone makes you a mac user, so you can all stfu
irly !!
Posted by: aixsir |"
You're stupid fool
Posted by: | August 07, 2008 at 11:38 PM
"For serial though. Those 8 people bought something useless as a status symbol and now those 8 people are the only in the world to have it. Just got a lot bigger of a status symbol than they expected/paid for."
hahahahahahhaha
Posted by: asdf | August 07, 2008 at 11:45 PM
Yes... Another sign that the end is near.
Posted by: Mabus | August 08, 2008 at 12:02 AM
Aw, Bill Gates or some rich celebrity should have have bought the application so it'd have at least *one* purchase. Give Steve Jobs a great big F.U.
Posted by: MacShill (Chris McCaw) | August 08, 2008 at 12:07 AM
Where can I buy an "I am poor" program and how much would it cost? har har
Posted by: SoGnarly | August 08, 2008 at 12:09 AM
I'm just waiting for the "smackthedeadbaby" app.
Posted by: malachi pearson-mccaw | August 08, 2008 at 12:10 AM
" " wrote: You're stupid fool
why is that, because I use the most advanced OS that you never heard of or will come within a thousand feet of in your lifetime? or because you fail to see both the truth and sarcasm in my message. stop flame baiting kid. /im not posting anymore in this thread, subsequent posts by this name are void/
Posted by: aixsir | August 08, 2008 at 12:19 AM
Who needs protecting from their own stupidity by a company like Apple? Do you?
Posted by: Nick | August 07, 2008 at 09:24 PM
exactly!
who buys any piece of software without at least googleing it first, especially if you're going to pay a grand for it, and _especially_ if you think its a joke.
its alll about personal responsibility
...or the lack there of.
Posted by: h | August 08, 2008 at 01:04 AM
You can still get the full effect for free. Just visit http://www.orangebits.com/iamrich on your iPhone and add it to your Home Screen
Posted by: orangebits | August 08, 2008 at 01:14 AM
Now that no one can buy it anymore, the people who already have it can resell their phones (with I Am Rich installed) at a profit to even stupider richer people, thus proving that maybe they weren't so stupid after all. :p
Posted by: jib | August 08, 2008 at 01:20 AM
We would not have gotten this comment (*SARCASM*):
"I saw this gun with a few friends and we jokingly pulled the trigger thinking it was a joke, to see what would happen. ... THIS IS NO JOKE...DO NOT PULL THE TRIGGER OF THIS GUN AND PLEASE REMOVE THIS FROM THE GUN STORE,"
Posted by: bluepuma | August 08, 2008 at 01:20 AM
I think it was indeed a joke, but one that you buy for a grand. One can only hope that it was funny though!
Posted by: Praveen Bhat | August 08, 2008 at 02:13 AM
I don't know what some of you are going on about. You can return anything these days. So what if the person bought it by accident, apple has a great return policy and AT&T nor MAC would want the bad publicity.
Posted by: Hello refund | August 08, 2008 at 02:39 AM
1 app = $999.99 = iMconceited
Posted by: orgyfinger | August 08, 2008 at 03:37 AM
Some people will buy anything. Maybe there is a chance for lava lamps to make a comeback. Well, maybe not.
Posted by: erichansa | August 08, 2008 at 03:44 AM
I wonder why people are so quick to label these 8 people as stupid? Depending on their level of wealth, $1,000 may be relative to most people spending $1. Think about it: someone with a net worth of $100 (read: me) might spend $1 on an application as a joke, right? Well, that's the same as someone with a net worth of $100,000 spending $1,000 on the I Am Rich application. Maybe some of you just don't agree with spending money in order to gain status. Most people seek status through some means (their profession, their spending, even philanthropy). If you found these people, they'd probably tell you they did it for "fun." A lot of money spent for fun's sake is not exactly "well spent" (weekend in Vegas, anyone?) Anyway, I'm continually surprised how quick people are to judge and label others. More than likely, many of you probably unconsciously (or consciously!) wish you had the discretionary income to splurge so "stupidly." Cheers!
Posted by: Kevin | August 08, 2008 at 03:52 AM
This is awesome.
And we see how apple is becoming a real Big Brother.
Well, we all have to agree they provided us amazing stuff with iPhone.
But everything comes at a price, I guess.
If you really look deep at it, the only big difference (despite being cheaper)
found on the 3G iPhone from the previous one are the applications.
The possibility of downloading apps. wouldn't be launched without another consumerist and epic launch from Apple. So to me, that was the real purpose of releasing this new generation of iPhones and it was what enabled the manufacturer to dramatically low the prices.
The old good Apple is dead.
Posted by: Marcelo Pena Costa | August 08, 2008 at 04:01 AM
Some people like to spend their money in absurd things (to the eyes of the others), 1000$ for a piece of art is not that much.
Take for example the oil “Black Square” of Kazimir Malevich
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazimir_Malevich
If the application is correctly described and the buyer is aware of what is acquiring, I see no problem. Everybody is free to spend his money on whatever they wants.
Posted by: Daniel Oliveras | August 08, 2008 at 04:06 AM
I am able to purchase apps with one click if it is within a certain time limit after my last log in. This REALLY annoys me because I've ALWAYS used the shopping basket. Now I have to make a list of the apps I might want, decide which ones I can afford including checking if there is a free app that does the same thing! Then go back and purchase the ones I want! This is driving me crazy. Several times I have purchased an app to find out later there was a free equivalent (leading me to only download free apps unless absolutely necessary). I can see how you could get this app by accident. I took a look at this app on the Danish Store, after hearing about this on "digg", Yet again, I would never have clicked purchase ... but sadly, someone had to find out if it was a joke or not...
Posted by: anarkast | August 08, 2008 at 04:26 AM
Not so funny after all ! The guy is actually making some money after all
http://tinyurl.com/6ppvpm
Posted by: Sachin Balagopalan | August 08, 2008 at 04:34 AM
Nah just kidding
Posted by: aixsir | August 08, 2008 at 04:39 AM
The iPhone is NOT a Mac, therefor an iPhone user isn't necessary a Mac(intosh) user.
The iPhone runs OS X, not Mac OS X.!
Posted by: tsu.R | August 08, 2008 at 04:39 AM
"Six people from the United States, one from Germany and one from France dropped a grand for the gem in the first 24 hours it was available"
- i wish i had that kind of money and time on my hands to waste
Posted by: cory | August 08, 2008 at 05:13 AM
So there is a market for useless stuff. I didn't see that coming.
Posted by: foo | August 08, 2008 at 05:37 AM
"It's a great work of art. My guess is it will increase in value and was a bargain at 999.99."
Just get off the internet, your lack of intelligence disgusts me.
Posted by: | August 08, 2008 at 05:37 AM
just get the app off torrents
Posted by: dakathis | August 08, 2008 at 05:58 AM
There is a market for stupid people who want useless applications for 1000$, why don't they let people serve this market?
Posted by: Bourbonnais Il | August 08, 2008 at 06:05 AM
"mac users are stupid, point proven."
i prefer PCs but have an iphone. its an iphone homeboy. not a macphone. obviously pc users have iphones too. your post was completely irrelevant. and so is your life. owned.
Posted by: * | August 08, 2008 at 06:25 AM
Natural Selection at its best.....
Posted by: Billy | August 08, 2008 at 06:27 AM
So what? $1000 is nothing, I repeat, a drop in the bucket to some people. Anyway, I don't see anyone bellyaching when people pay millions for a postage stamp or a Van Gogh or Rembrandt.
Somebody paid $140 million, that's MILLION, for a Jason Pollock a couple of years ago.
This iPhone envy is out of hand.
Posted by: encephlavator | August 08, 2008 at 07:06 AM
SoGnarly: "Where can I buy an "I am poor" program and how much would it cost? har har"
I'm not sure you can put a program on a rotary phone. har har.
Posted by: jeremy | August 08, 2008 at 07:10 AM
Aw man, all it takes is for one poor person to start whining about how he bought the app "accidentally" and the rest of us rich folk are made to suffer. If you're not rich enough to buy it, stop looking at it.
Posted by: Moomin Papa | August 08, 2008 at 07:27 AM
I bought one ..and now its gone.. so Im selling mine on ebay for 3999.99 $
Posted by: kheemo | August 08, 2008 at 07:50 AM
The gem image is stretched out from it's original aspect ratio once the app is started; it's not even aesthetically pleasing!
Posted by: Shawn | August 08, 2008 at 07:55 AM
With people being hurt in the world and all we can do with technology is make ways to spend money on stupid stuff like this.
Posted by: fragmall | August 08, 2008 at 08:28 AM
if the apple website does not ask for verification that you actually want to purchase something after a single click, then something is wrong with the site. the user got what he deserved.
This is part of why I dislike Apple products. this thread however is a perfect example of why I dislike Apple users.
Posted by: Frankyt | August 08, 2008 at 08:28 AM
>>Not all iPhone & iPod/iTunes users are Mac users, genius. So, the only point proven is that you're a Windows user, you're not very bright & quite bitter about something you don't have the slightest clue about.
>> Posted by: Legs |
Actually, you're the dumb one, Leggo. Ever heard of linux? or even BSD? Solaris? You obviously don't have the clue you think others are missing.
Posted by: | August 08, 2008 at 08:32 AM
Apple sucks. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with this application. If people feel it's worth $1000 to them, why not let them buy it. Who the F does Apple think they are?
People buy things that others feel are way overpriced every day. It doesn't make them "stupid". If they have the money they can spend it any way they wish. Some people leave millions of dollars to thier pets!
Stop the big brother mentality.
This application should NOT have been removed from the Apple store. If it were my application I'd be hiring some hot-shot lawers to handle my case and I'd sue the pants off of "Big-Brother Apple".
Appholes!
Posted by: Raven | August 08, 2008 at 08:44 AM
Box Office was *probably* removed because it keeps crashing under software release 2.0. I have the application and it just won't run since I've upgraded to the 2.0 firmware.
-- Raven
Posted by: Raven | August 08, 2008 at 08:49 AM
"With people being hurt in the world and all we can do with technology is make ways to spend money on stupid stuff like this."
It seems to me like he found a way to extract wealth from people who had more than they knew what do do with. Presuming he has a use for the money, the application may actually have provided a net benefit to society.
Posted by: Stephen | August 08, 2008 at 08:57 AM
Why are all you poor people so jealous of us rich people?
I mean, really, Apple product owners specifically, and rich people in general, are obviously not "stupid". At the very least, we are smart enough to have more money than you have.
If you were so "smart", you could afford nice things like macs and iPhones and thousand dollar useless applications...but you aren't and you can't, so you hate on us...sad, pitiful little insignificant creatures that you are.
Really, go back to text messaging on your Nokia 1100 and leave us alone.
Thank You.
Posted by: Iamrichtoo | August 08, 2008 at 08:59 AM
"you still have to type in your iTunes password before purchasing, so it's extremely unlikely anyone purchased it accidentally with a swipe."
The iTunes store only does that at the start of a session, and if you'd bought a track or two from the music side of things I suspect it won't ask you again.
"if the apple website does not ask for verification that you actually want to purchase something after a single click, then something is wrong with the site."
Yes, one-click purchasing is a really bad idea, and both Amazon and Apple are doing their customers a disservice by making it available... but this isn't Steve Jobs' bad idea, it's Jeff Bezos'.
Posted by: Peter da Silva | August 08, 2008 at 09:10 AM
@Raven - "Who the F does Apple think they are?"
The owner-operators of the App store. If you want full control of your iPhone, unlock it and kiss your warranty goodbye. Apple tries to make the experience the best for the most people. If that involves snubbing some german trying to play off the mindless idiocy of the wealthy in order to protect average joe from a $1020 app-store bill, then that's what they're going to do. People seem to forget ever so quickly that when you own and operate a business, you get to run it how you see fit. Don't like that apple has a closed software platform on the iPhone? Don't buy one. And then shut the hell up.
Posted by: TheStripe | August 08, 2008 at 09:18 AM
whats the big deal ? idiot apps for idiots who think i-anything is a status symbol...once they are out of college they'll become smarter..i hope :)
Posted by: rr | August 08, 2008 at 09:22 AM
Shame you cant buy class really isnt it Iamrichtoo
Posted by: Si | August 08, 2008 at 09:25 AM
I've got a bridge that these 8 may be interested in buying.
Posted by: Adam | August 08, 2008 at 09:28 AM
I think any app should be allowed on the store, as long as it isnt illegal or offensive.....
If someone wants to buy an ultra expensive app... so be it.
Posted by: Jack Bramhall | August 08, 2008 at 09:37 AM
I was one of the individuals who purchased this application, and I have to say that it is well-worth the $1000. The image uploaded online does nothing to attest to the true beauty of "the glowing red gem." I would buy this app 1000 more times if it was necessary, and I would encourage all those who have iPhones to do the same.
Posted by: Zack Sawyer | August 08, 2008 at 09:47 AM
they removed Break Classic
Posted by: ant | August 08, 2008 at 09:56 AM
What would $1000 or $8000, mean to a local animal shelter?
Or a local non-profit assisting those who are disabled.
Veterans in need?
Yes- its their money- they can do what they want, but that doesnt mean its not SAD.
Posted by: JimiE | August 08, 2008 at 10:08 AM
The second comment in this thread was worth more than all the rest combined.
The idea of doing this and donating 90% to charity is priceless though. I think it would actually sell.
Posted by: bill | August 08, 2008 at 10:13 AM
I think it's hysterical that this "useless app" has so many people talking about it. Clearly, it is VERY useful...useful for generating lots of comments from fools like us. And kudos to those of you that have the coin to purchase a $999.99 app.
I hope that "I am Rich v2" comes out soon.
Posted by: jhef | August 08, 2008 at 10:24 AM
It's genius IMHO. You figure out of millions of iPhone users, some percentage will be dumb, rich or curious enough to buy this. And you get paid for their stupidity.
I wish Apple would leave it on the Store - I'd love to see how much this guy makes over time.
Posted by: Steve Curcuru | August 08, 2008 at 10:31 AM
What people always forget: It's not the amount some people receive which is the question, but what they do with it.
Rich people might spend their money with much more benefit to humanity than less rich people. It always depends on the individuum.
I think we don't know anything about it in this case. (Only, from his web page, that he will return money to people who did not really want to buy it.)
And we shouldn't judge that Armin anyway.
Posted by: Peer | August 08, 2008 at 10:35 AM
The real question now is what did the secret Mantra say?
Posted by: eon | August 08, 2008 at 10:50 AM
If the guy who posted about buying it for a joke really did, then he is an idiot and deserves to have lost his money. What could he possibly think would happen? Buying that app would be no different than buying any other app in the store.
Muppet.
Posted by: Robert McGovern | August 08, 2008 at 10:54 AM
A fool and his money are soon parted...
Don't understand the fuss. Who was the nanny state backer who asked Apple to remove the app? Seriously, get a life and stop worrying about how others are spending their money and time. What did you think you were downloading for $999.99 ??
Posted by: dd | August 08, 2008 at 11:05 AM
erik Parker: Technically all iPhone owners are mac users since the OS on the phone is a stripped down OS X. Ergo those mac users are really stupid.
Posted by: Ryan | August 08, 2008 at 11:09 AM
I can see why Apple agreed to have the app on their store at first. 30% is a nice reward from one person very clever work.
Posted by: lune | August 08, 2008 at 11:28 AM
We live in times when people are not supposed to have convictions of any kind. The triumph of capitalism is not to be celebrated but ashamed of. How could Apple allow users to use their product to openly brag about their social status? Company wants to make money (it should!) while keeping the image of a socially aware, hippie friendly, modest as a head scarf, business enabling but not intruding multicultural...
Gee, whatever! $999.99 for an application? If somebody wants to spend money on something they want who has the right to object? Apple does, according to application distribution agreement. And that is a serious problem brought to light by this case. The platform is not free in any sense of the word, consumers of the service do not own the phone or the computer. They are simply leasing a convenient product, that's all.
I own an iPhone, and although I have no intention of purchasing a thousand dollars worth of bling bling, I see no reason why would anyone, including myself, be prevented form doing so.
As a programmer, I could not program for a platform where the distribution of software is under a mercy of the operating system vendor. Similarities to Netscape vs. Windoze monopoly become apparent here. Consequence in MS case was that independent software makers are less likely to "innovate" as Gates would put it, that is create truly new things as they did in the early days of PC. Apple will see its fair share of new stuff coming, but given the risk of being shut out, there will be less application developers - till the new google platform comes along.
In the end, freedom wins. Let capitalism work. We don't need thousand dollar applications that do nothing. We don't need good cars. We don't need faster computers, multiple pairs of running shoes, diamonds, carbon bicycles, YouTube, Facebook, bottled water, cosmetics, fast food, sushi, or iPhone. But that is exactly the point! Either we live in freedom to choose what we want for ourselves, or someone else is appointed to determine our "need".
Apple Inc, when given the power do decide for others, has chosen to use it. Unwise, but predictable. Power corrupts. Few have the wisdom to resist it.
Posted by: Vlatko Primorac | August 08, 2008 at 11:40 AM
@TheStripe: My comment had nothing whatsoever to do with taking control of the device or it being a closed software platform. It had to do with Apple removing an application that doesn't seem to break any of the terms and conditions of the App Store agreement.
I'm well aware of the fact that Apple own/operates the app store. I own my own business so I don't need you to tell me how businesses operate. I see no legitimate reason for Apple removing the software. Protecting average Joe from being an idiot isn't a legitimate reason. Sounds like you have a beef with European people and rich people.
As for your contention that I don't like that the device is closed, you're right. Mine is Jailbroke and I could care less about the warranty.
Next time maybe you should think twice before you post pointed personal attacks on a public forum. Don't presume you can tell people to "shut-up".
Shame on Apple for removing this application from the App Store for no good reason. Oh yeah, they don't need a good reason according to "TheStripe". After all, if you own/run a business you can do whatever you want...
..like Enron.
Appholes!
Posted by: Raven | August 08, 2008 at 11:44 AM
a fool and their money...
Anyone who shelled out the 500 bucks for the FIRST series of a Computer are the same fools that the former statement is referring to. If they were so vain and so stupid to actually spend that $999.99 for a phone app they deserve what they got... NOTHING!
Posted by: brice | August 08, 2008 at 11:49 AM
The "I am Rich" app would be so much cooler if all proceeds had secretly been donated to the Democratic Party.
Posted by: Matthew Graham | August 08, 2008 at 12:27 PM
In a ridiculous act of protectionism Apple removed the very first moneymaking app from Germany from their servers?
This is to be brought before the trade commission and Apple to be condemned for such action.
How many totally useless pieces of dear software got thrown on us everyday by American companies?
I AM ABSOLUTELY SPEECHLESS! IS THIS APPLES UNDERSTANDING OF FREEDOM OF TRADE!
WAAAHAAHAAHAA! Best story I have read this year. Tops everything. Please, Times, gimme more!
Posted by: Joerg-Peter Haase | August 08, 2008 at 12:45 PM
Good for Heinrich. He made a quick (and honest) buck by providing a small number of extremely vain people with something they value. On top of that, he made a very poignant (and funny) social statement. I think that Apple realized their customers were being mocked and that's why they put an end to it.
Posted by: an enemy of vanity | August 08, 2008 at 01:09 PM
If Heinrich was smart, he would wait another month, and then if he has not received any money, he would pull a lawsuit against apple. He rightfully earned that money, and just because apple doesn't think it belongs there, it's still something that he earned, and they did have to promise him that money.
Posted by: FeurFly | August 08, 2008 at 01:12 PM
Great, now there will be a black market for "I am rich" apps. The price is likely to skyrocket!
Posted by: Hmmmmm | August 08, 2008 at 03:38 PM
Apple is doing nothing other than fuelling a growing trend in discriminating against people with more money than we have. The way I see, if rich people want to show us how rich they are, then who are we to say they can't do that... of course, it's pretty clear that Apple have a particularly anti-libertarian mandate judging by some of their actions, this included...
Posted by: Daverson | August 08, 2008 at 04:12 PM
What's the problem here?
The eight people who bought "I am Rich" have money to burn. Let them spend it.
Posted by: Frank Shook | August 08, 2008 at 04:29 PM
Armin Heinrich is my new personal hero. People own an i-phone as a statement, so why can't he sell an application that makes the same statement: "I enjoy wasting money on shiny crap, because it makes me look cool." This is the best news in a long time, in my opinion.
Posted by: mark | August 08, 2008 at 05:00 PM
iPhone users spending a bunch of money because it's a shiny status symbol? Nah, couldn't be...
Posted by: Adam | August 08, 2008 at 06:02 PM
They should release a second app called "I am stupid", for those two idiots that bought this app without knowing what it was.
Posted by: Nick | August 08, 2008 at 07:10 PM
"mac users are stupid, point proven"
Poster without a name. Son of Bill Gates or maybe of Steve Baldguy?
Or maybe one who benefits from Gates' contribution to charity that he becomes such a Mac hater. More like Madhatter.
'your post was completely irrelevant. and so is your life' -that's well said.
Posted by: Adam John | August 08, 2008 at 07:39 PM
Wow, I can't believe I just sat here and read all those posts and I don't even own an iPhone. I only even saw this becasue a friend emailed me the link, but all these comments and arguements were just so entertaining. =)
P.S: I would have to say though, if I had millions of dollars and owned an iPhone, I might find it entertaining/worth it to buy it like those 8 people did. I am not a millionaire though, so I am happy to just waste my extra money on DVDs.
Posted by: AnimeGirl | August 08, 2008 at 08:51 PM
Im Kobe Bryant and I personally bought all 8 copies of the program that were sold. I love it.
Posted by: kobe bryant | August 08, 2008 at 09:36 PM
hmm, i think its more important to discuss the fact that apple censored the store than to discuss how some poeple spend there money.
[this should be an english comment :]
Posted by: mr.green | August 08, 2008 at 10:34 PM
There are some laws in the United States about "merchantability". If you manufactured something that looked like a cellphone, advertised it as a cellphone, painted it to look like a cell phone, and priced it as a cell phone, but it really was just a brick, you could get relief because it wasn't what it was promoted to be.
In this case, it was promoted to be a status symbol. Apple must have thought it was meant to be a piece of art. If they removed it from their App Store, that would make them art critics.
Or maybe they thought that the program, which is little more than a hello world example program with a graphic splash, was not merchantable because the program did not have any usable function. On the other hand, I would bet money that the source code of this app varied less than one percent from a sample app provided in the sdk and Apple really cannot see people repackaging their sample apps and selling them in Apple's App Store.
I don't know where the gem image came from, but I expect that a skilled iPhone programmer could knock off the app in under one minute in the development environment. Of course some people may see such simplicity as elegance.
The iPhone already has a built in app for displaying pictures. They may feel that a program that does nothing but display a picture, adds nothing to the device of value, and therefore cannot abide its sale, or their acceptance of their share of the profits. Since they earn a share, they can be sued. If the lawyers think they could be sued over an App, they could chose not to sell it.
This will probably cause a change to the App Store agreement that requires applications to demonstrate functionality beyond the existing built-in functions of the device.
He can still sell his gem image on ebay. They don't seem to care what gets sold there.
Posted by: Douglas Goodall | August 08, 2008 at 10:35 PM
Cuando leo estas cosas me doy cuenta que el mundo hay cada vez mas estupidos
No se merecen otra cosa
when I read those things I see there are more stupid people than I thought
They deserve it and more
Posted by: Zacarias Lapolla | August 09, 2008 at 04:13 AM
Apple made the right move. The last thing they need is for the “fashionable” and “trendy” aspect of the iPhone to be tarnished (or replaced) with the perception that the iPhone (and Apple’s Mac) are for arrogant snobs.
Posted by: Greg Lloyd | August 09, 2008 at 07:22 AM
>>Not all iPhone & iPod/iTunes users are Mac users, genius. So, the only point proven is that you're a Windows user, you're not very bright & quite bitter about something you don't have the slightest clue about.
>> Posted by: Legs |
Actually, you're the dumb one, Leggo. Ever heard of linux? or even BSD? Solaris? You obviously don't have the clue you think others are missing.
Posted by: | August 09, 2008 at 08:27 AM
Does anybody else wonder... if he made the picture or just grabbed it from an online source?
Posted by: Dooley | August 09, 2008 at 10:04 AM
I have an idea, instead of buying software that has a graphic of a gem, why not spend the $999 on a real gem for a custom leather iPhone case?
You would have to have someone looking at your iPhone screen or show them for anyone to ever notice your cool status symbol. Maybe get a custom cradle that shows off you iPhone in your car?
Although it wasn't intended to be a joke, the complaint in the reviews made it one when they clicked on the BUY button. (and the joke was on the poster)
I think the I am Poor application should be a second life clone where the whole world is a trailer park, or the redneck windchime. (a bunch of Budweiser cans hanging on a piece of wood) It should warn interested buyers that they must own an iPhone to use the software.
Posted by: matt | August 09, 2008 at 11:38 AM
Actually the iPhone runs Mac OSX correct? All of any group couldn't be stupid, in fact they must have a decent source of income to purchase the phone right? Mostly affluent, yet PC ignorant artsy type folks. Mac machines are not nearly as widely used for enterprise level computing. The funny thing is when the computer breaks you get a sad apple screen with a little tear running down it's cheek. At least the Blue Screen of Death has some information on it.
Posted by: Matt | August 09, 2008 at 11:42 AM
Well if people have got money to burn.... I've got no sympathy for any idiot who bought it "by mistake" - read the price tag you morons!
Posted by: psychomuso | August 10, 2008 at 10:25 AM
What is this, a rich envy? I paid a $1000 foe a guitar which does not play, $2300 for a faked Picasso. You can insult my intelligence or the fact that I buy a new Apple every time it comes out but, at the end, I am the winner.
Posted by: Kem Azbrna | August 10, 2008 at 11:07 AM
I doubt Apple's legal, moral, or ethical authority to remove this application is relevant to this discussion. It is quite probable that they have the legal authority and I can't see how they are bound by morality or ethics other than through how it affects their market. As a customer, I find nothing objectionable about the I Am Rich app, but I'm in favor of Apple keeping the App Store relatively uncluttered until they find a more refined way for me to search. As an Apple shareholder, I want them to carefully manage the App Store's inventory in such a way that it enhances the long-term value of the iPhone and the Apple brand to a select market. I do not to want them to "stack 'em high" and react to the whims of the masses by selling apps that are the marketing equivalent of a Burberry baseball cap.
Posted by: vpower | August 10, 2008 at 01:12 PM
Why would Apple remove this app from their store? I don't see amazon.com, tigerdirect, newegg... removing items that are clearly not worth the money from their stores? This looser that said he thought it was a joke and clicked buy now should have to pay for the app, but then he should put the phone back into the box it came in and return it to the store because he is clearly too stupid to use it.
Stupid people just piss me off, they cause too many problems in this world :)
Posted by: Chris Konieczny | August 10, 2008 at 02:27 PM
hahahaha what a bunch of losers - get a life
Posted by: joker | August 11, 2008 at 10:37 AM
I LOVE the irony.
Guess Apple pulled it because they realized that somebody else was making MORE money of something MORE silly then their little phone.
Wake up everybody. Apple are the only one's allowed to sell overpriced status symbols!!
Posted by: lefthndo | August 11, 2008 at 10:46 AM
The app is a glorified pet rock. Anyone remember those? It's easy to market something practical; the clever people are ones who can make money selling something that's completely useless.
Posted by: Ah | August 12, 2008 at 05:26 AM
Wow, only six people in the world have this app. talke about expensive!
New G3 mint condition With "I am Rich" app selling for 10,000, do i hear 10Grand?
Posted by: TheWorldIsConformed | August 12, 2008 at 03:54 PM
Only EIGHT people in th world have this app. Sort of like a secret club. The fact that it was pulled off the market just increased its value.
Posted by: Sho | August 13, 2008 at 12:38 AM
Bottom line is, who cares? Let people spend money on what they want. It's not yours, so don't worry about it. If people want to spend a thousand dollars for an icon, let them. Capitalism, man. More power to it.
Posted by: Kevin | August 13, 2008 at 04:03 PM
umm im glad its off the site apple dosent need bad publicity from con artist trying to dis-credit the companies name, come on their OS sucks enough already and the apple iphone is for loosers that want to be cool ,, lol >>>> respond (:>p)
Posted by: eric | August 14, 2008 at 12:41 PM
Brilliant because it's a 'Legal' and a smart idea, Full stop guys. I'm sure there are many people with more money than sense who would love this application. Just the simple fact that you have an application icon on your home screen that no one else can afford is gone enough for me son. Well, that’s if I had the money of course. Do you know how many business fail in the first year? This guy had an idea and 'apple' took it away from him. Why, no one knows. I don't normally read blocks but I was very impressed with this guys imagine. You know one of those ideas that make you think 'I wish I thought of that' Well, this was one of them.
Fair play is fair play, and as for those that said "I did it for a joke" Well, hopefully this will help them grow up lol.
Posted by: Dial0800 4 Comments | August 15, 2008 at 11:23 AM
Well here should be a great marketing lesson. Why not make your own "rich at home" apps, for half the price and see if apple will approve it. There is obiously a market and demand for such things...
They are buyer and have money to burn. I am sure many can brainstorm some similar idea's and make Apple very happy, just add a different sland and spin on it. You never know what they may approve...
Posted by: Gerald | August 18, 2008 at 06:46 AM
I really think that that aplication is over priced...
Posted by: Andi Pink | August 20, 2008 at 05:30 AM
"I really think that this application is overpriced"
LMAO you think so?? No s**t!
Who cares!!! If people wanna buy this c**p it's up to them at the end of the day it's their money to do with as they please. If you can afford to waste that much money then you must be doin something right!
Posted by: stacey | August 22, 2008 at 04:02 AM
Will wealth envy never cease to end? Stop worrying about how much someone else can spend on something they want, worry about yourself.
Posted by: mm00re | August 26, 2008 at 12:45 PM
Will wealth envy never cease to end? Stop worrying about how much someone else can spend on something they want, worry about yourself and stfu.
Posted by: mm00re | August 26, 2008 at 12:47 PM
That is the second best scam I've ever heard of. Now what he needs to do is make an upgrade version, maybe call it "View from the Top." Then add a bunch of "improvements" that slow it down or don't work. Then he can charge what Microsoft does for Vista and really rake in the cash.
Posted by: brian | August 28, 2008 at 09:49 AM
Ummm I hate to break it to the dev who wrote this, but he won't be getting his $5,600. Apple's developer terms clearly state that the developer will receive a 70% cut on sales of OVER 250 purchases.
Posted by: Geniusdog254 | August 29, 2008 at 07:11 PM
over 55% of iPhone users are windows users..as usual just like anyone else who likes to crap in their own backyard... They shine through with their ignorance. Funny how most of these same people have no concept of why they're crying about in the 1st place.. I know 1st hand the amount of idiots who buy this phone & the amount of smart people who do as well.. I'm not condoning a 1000. Software title... Believe me. & agree that people should spend money for better things. These are people who can afford to live a life of excess. Sadly most people who spend this kind of money who have it, have low self esteem & are compensating for something else missing, hummer anyone? Living on a town where stupidity reigns supreme & egos are all on fire, I can assure you that the majority of people who would spend money like this are so plentiful, just to compensate or have the brains of an ant .. I see it daily .. The world is not dumb, just ignorant & to jacked on antidepressants to really know any better. Or they're just from so cal.. They don't have a fighting chance in the real world, so instead of bitching, let's just sit back & watch .. Every up has a down .. The bigger the harder the fall..let's all go watch wall-e. If you have brains. None of this will matter anyway.. Technology e waste. Bankruptcy. China owning us. These are the things I worry about, not about some useless dummy dropping a note on something useless. They do it every day.. Leave em alone. Worry about your own stuff. Don't crap in you're own bed. If you have any brains, read atlas shrugged.. Epic failure is not that far away..
Posted by: kevin | August 30, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Well I would love to know why Apple would pull that program? I don't think it broke any rules, all it does is weed out the idiots of society. I am happy that guy made all that money off a program that most likely took him 10 min to create. I wish I would have thought of that. I think I should come out with a program called "I am middle class" and sell it for $500 and instead of a Ruby it will be a Cubic Zirconium.
Posted by: cinimod | September 01, 2008 at 12:53 AM
does this mean apple will start giving refunds to any iphone who isn't satisfied with the app they just bought?
Is this already the case?
Posted by: Roy | September 07, 2008 at 03:38 AM
Check out the Chumby, an internet device with a touchscreen. There is an "I am richer" application available. http://www.chumby.com/guide/widget/I+am+richer
Posted by: Krupp | September 09, 2008 at 11:57 AM
Awesome. Anyone that clicked buy while knowing what it was deserves what they got.
Posted by: HollywoodDream | September 09, 2008 at 04:09 PM
Buying iPhone is not much stupidier than buying this program, snobs
:P
Posted by: killmeplease | September 17, 2008 at 04:17 AM
It's not an apple or whatsoever problem, it's a problem of "Be Different" fashion. More and more idiots, trying to "be different", thinking money can buy you mind. Going to mobile phone market was a big goal for apple, now they have bling-bling customers also, which were lost before, because don't know what is a computer :) Next step for apple is to release trousers, jewelry and all kind of things needed to fulfill "be different" image :D
Posted by: BoNdier | September 19, 2008 at 09:28 AM
I got the cracked version of this app and then showed it to a bunch of people. some of them actually believed that i bought it.
And I'm 13
Posted by: Dominic | September 28, 2008 at 03:57 PM
What a difference three months makes. Now the trouble is apps are getting too cheap, instead of too expensive (from the point of view of the long-term viability of the platform: http://www.pocketgamer.co.uk/r/Various/iPhone/feature.asp?c=9936
Posted by: Jeremy | November 12, 2008 at 03:25 AM