Early Word: Dems Name Warner as Keynote Speaker

This just in this morning.

Former Gov. Mark Warner of Virginia, now the favorite in that state’s Senate race, will be the keynote speaker at this year’s Democratic convention. This is the featured role that Mr. Obama was given in 2004.

Mr. Warner will speak on Tuesday night, the second day of the convention. In a statement, David Plouffe, the Obama campaign manager, said:

As governor of Virginia, Warner used his experience in business to help deliver jobs and hope to the citizens of Virginia. His work creating jobs in southwest and southside Virginia is a model for the rest of the country.

Like Barack Obama, Mark Warner is not afraid to challenge the status quo to bring people together and get things moving. It’s that kind of spirit and innovation that resulted in his selection as keynote speaker on a night when we will be discussing how to renew America’s promise.”

As for the Democratic platform, the section on abortion received attention yesterday for language that differs from 2004 and that now seems meant to appease those Democrats who are not staunch supporters of abortion rights.

The Washington Post points out the new language:

The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman’s right to choose a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay, and we oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right. The Democratic Party also strongly supports access to affordable family planning services and comprehensive age-appropriate sex education which empower people to make informed choices and live healthy lives. We also recognize that such health care and education help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the need for abortions. The Democratic Party also strongly supports a woman’s decision to have a child by ensuring access to and availability of programs for pre- and post-natal health care, parenting skills, income support, and caring adoption programs.

In other convention mentions, The Rocky Mountain News interviews a few people who claim they were told they would have to spend hours volunteering for the Obama campaign in order to qualify for tickets to the rock-star event at Invesco stadium where Mr. Obama is to make his acceptance speech on Thursday night. The campaign says that ticket availability isn’t based on paying those dues, but this account comes on the heels of some discussion earlier this week by Marc Ambinder of The Atlantic that those long lines of people waiting to get into the stadium might be handed cell phones and calls lists and be asked to help register people to vote.

Meanwhile, Mr. Obama continues his vacation in Hawaii, where he attended a large fund-raiser with an island theme last night. The campaign was tight-lipped about attendees; in fact, a reporter for The New York Times was asked to leave the grounds after he tried to interview some people who were entering the event.

The Obama campaign has also kept the media away from the house where the family is staying, refusing to let reporters stake out a public beach near the property. The Politico reports that Mr. Obama’s vacation rental — which is said to have 10.5 bedrooms — is owned by Lakeside Enterprises, whose general partner is a Democratic fund-raiser, Jill Tate Higgins. But the campaign says the Obamas rented the house without knowing who owned it, and rented it for this vacation at market value. (The Politico makes the comparison to the Clintons, who often stayed for free at supporters’ homes in places like the Vineyard when they were a presidential couple.)

Now on to the McCain front. Senator John McCain heads to Michigan today, where his campaign says he will hold a late-afternoon news conference. On Tuesday, he spent a second day in Pennsylvania with former Governor Tom Ridge. Michael Cooper of The New York Times reported that Senator Joe Lieberman blasted Mr. Obama, saying that unlike him, Mr. McCain would always put country first.

In addition, Mr. McCain reminded supporters at his event about Mr. Obama’s controversial primary remarks that small-town voters in places like the Keystone State cling to their guns and religion. Mr. McCain promised, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer, to visit as many “hamlets” in the state as possible and said:

“I’m going to tell them I think they are the heartland of America, that the values they hold dear are the strength and character of America,” Mr. McCain said. “They’re the reason why the people in Georgia today are looking to America . . . a beacon of hope and liberty.”

Shelf LifeJim Rutenberg and Julie Bosman of The New York Times profile the anti-Obama book author, Jerome R. Corsi, whose previous endeavors include “Unfit for Command” against Senator John Kerry in 2004. Parts of his latest book, “The Obama Nation,” have already been refuted, but the book will nonetheless land at the top of our best seller list this weekend.

Strange Bedfellows In the South, Ralph Reed, whose bid for lieutenant governor was foiled a while back because of his ties to Jack Abramoff, revealed as the details spilled out of one of Mr. McCain’s inquiries into gambling lobbying for native Americans, is back in the news. This time, he’s inviting fellow Georgians (from the state of Georgia, that is, and not the country in the news) to join him at a fund-raiser in Atlanta for his newfound friend, Mr. McCain. Mr. Reed, the former head of the Christian Coalition, may still help the McCain camp with conservatives in a state where Bob Barr, the Libertarian presidential candidate, is expected to steal away votes from the Republican ticket.

VeepWatch: Stumping for the Arizona senator in Indiana yesterday, Rob Portman, the former Ohio representative and Bush-administration budget official, said he had not been asked for financial information — perhaps a sign that he’s not being vetted as a possible running mate for the Republican ticket.

As for Senator Chuck Hagel, Republican of Nebraska, The Washington Post takes a look at concerns people would have if he were to be chosen as No. 2 on the Obama ticket.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

1- i strongly support roe v. wade and see nothing objectionable in the platform wording.

2- mo mention of the ralph reed fundraiser for songbird mccain, nyt?

3- that book is atop the nyt bestseller list, nyt? how about mentioning that “bulk buys” for the purpose of giving away copies put it atop the list, not individual purchases.

4- btw…2/3 of american corporations pay no taxes…and mccain/bush want to cut corporate taxes even more. scandalous, don’t you think.

Any way Obama can convince Warner to come out of retirement and take the running mate slot? He would be so much better for B.O. than Kaine or Bayh…

//www.political-buzz.com/

Senator Joe Lieberman blasted Mr. Obama, saying that unlike him, Mr. McCain would always put country first.

The sad part is that the McCain camnpaign did not condemn the statement. In fact, they used the ssame wording in a statement released to the press.

With this, John McCain again shows that the only thing he puts first is himself. He is willing to lie about Obama’s love of country to become President. He is willing to demean his wife by “jokingly” offering her up as a candidate in a racy biker beauty contest. He chides the Congress to get back to work for the country, yet has one of the worst voting records in the Senate (certainly worse than Obama’s). Tom Friedman writes that he loved his country so much that he missed eight votes on a renewable energy bill and that he missed one of the votes because he couldn’t bother to get out of his office.

Pundits say that people don’t yet know who Barack Obama is. A truer statement is that John McCain is not the selflessly patriotic and heroic person he believes himself to be.

I just had to say this:

If Clinton is not a viable candidate, solely because of her vote on the use of force in Iraq…why are we even looking at Evan Bayh…who vote for the war in Iraq.

I’m sure he’s personally qualified, but so is Clinton, even more so.

This is the hipocrisy of the Obamaite campaign…wasn’t this what they promised to stop?

I sincerely cannot wait until the Democrats get to 56 or so Senate seats and can safely kick Lieberman out of the caucus. I suspect he knows this will happen, and that he has almost no chance of being reelected in 2012.

While delivering the keynote speech, who comes trotting onto the stage….but Hillary and her Clintonitas, demanding, whining, and crying foul.

“This time, he’s inviting fellow Georgians (from the state of Georgia, that is, and not the country in the news)”

I’m sure this was included to avoid confusion on the part of Obama supporters.

I guess this is meant to shore up Obama’s chances of winning Virginia, without having to pick Tim Kaine as Veep? Whether intended or not, however, it has the effect of marginalizing Hillary. I assume the keynote speaker will get the primetime spot and that, on this 88th anniversary of women’s suffrage, Hillary’s speech will begin sometime after 11PM. Nice going, Obama and DNC! If you wanted to insult and incite disaffected Hillary
supporters anymore than you already have, you couldn’t have picked a better way to do it!

Hillary talked about offering her supporters a catharsis, stright out of Greek Tradgedy. It made me think about the fact that in virtually all the stories from Greek mythology in which a character does everything in his power to block a negative fate, and yet falls prey to it, we see that his efforts to subvert fate typically provide exactly the circumstances required for the prescribed fate to arise. In other words, the resisting characters themselves provide the path to fate’s fulfillment.
The Greeks called it hubris.

I guess that takes Mark Warner (and Claire McCaskill who’ll speak on opening night) out of the Veep-stakes…

JP: not to diminish your point but the statistic is actually “2/3 of corporations paid no income taxes for at least one year between 1996 and 2005.” It’s still inexcusable no matter how often it happens.

I do not understand a vacation that includes attending a fundraiser in an election cycle.

I guess “change” also means secrecy. Unless they are protecting the VP process, I do not see why reporters cannot get a full list of attendees of the fund-raiser. I am assuming they are some sort of lobbyists. Sounds like Cheney part deux to me.

hey – we still have time – let’s nominate senator clinton at the convention in denver and go out and win this thing. the obama camp has let the clintons in to the convention big time anyway – lets just nominate her and try to heal the schism that has developed in the party.

or, i guess we could keep the lemming impersonation going and follow donna brazile and the tribal elders of the DNC off the general election cliff behind the new false messiah. the DNC is such a joke and has betrayed the base – maybe its time for a third party.

S. Henderson: Don’t you mean McCain? That old guy who can’t remember who, where and when we are fighting. Amazing how no one is taking the guy to task for this. Am I the only one that sees a pattern of McCain looking just as bad on the foreign stage as our current frat boy president? The guy is about as inspiring as my grandpa was when lecturing me on how things used to be. It will be funny when the old guy starts making those major gaffs during the debates. I guess he must truly be following in the footsteps of Reagan with a nice case of alzeimer’s.

Headwind: it’s easy to see hypocrisy in everything when you invent arguments for those you oppose. I have yet to hear anyone say Hillary was not a viable candidate solely for her Iraq stance. I strongly agree with you, however, that Evan Bayh shouldn’t even be given a second glance. Democrats must not legitimize a Bush Dog Democrat who votes consistently with the GOP; otherwise Obama should just pick Lieberman and get the slow humiliating immolation of the Democratic Party over with.

How true:

‘A woman who wildly mismanages and bankrupts a quarter-of-a-billion-dollar campaign operation, and then blames sexism in society, will dampen the dreams of our daughters.’” Maureen Dowd

“Yesterday, I heard Sen. McCain say, ‘We are all Georgians now,’” Saakashvili said on CNN’s American Morning. “Well, very nice, you know, very cheering for us to hear that, but OK, it’s time to pass from this. From words to deeds.”
_____

They are both crazy!

After David Brooks’ recent mournful excuses for McCain’s going negative, I can hardly wait for his justification for Jerome Corsi’s latest lying tome. I’m sure he or another of McCain’s high profile apologists will fabricate some justification for the vile smears and falsehoods. But who can blame them? We’ve already seen that the lemmings of the GOP far right will follow their amoral vermin leaders down any gutter and gobble the filth.

#7 S.Henderson…whooo haaaa now THAT’S funny.

as a former obama supporter, i admit it. when i first heard about the invasion, i feared for my cousin in atlanta.

that’s why i switched to mccain. his foreign policy is sooo much simpler for me to understand. lot’s of bluster and threats, plenty shouting, and victory. yes victory[?] in iraq. lookout checkloosvakia…here i come.

and bombing. lot’s of bombing. no nuance in those bombs…yessiree bob.

Shelf Life: Jim Rutenberg and Julie Bosman of The New York Times profile the anti-Obama book author, Jerome R. Corsi, whose previous endeavors include “Unfit for Command” against Senator John Kerry in 2004. Parts of his latest book, “The Obama Nation,” have already been refuted, but the book will nonetheless land at the top of our best seller list this weekend.

Isn’t there a law in this country about printing lies in print? Isn’t this consider libel? Mr. Corsi is on the record that he will do anything to keep a Democrat out of White House. He said his book is a work of scholarship. However, it contains every misconception and lie about Barack Obama; which have already been denounced. This is not scholarship, but a form of “yellow journalism”. The college that gave Mr. Corsi his Ph. D. should revoke it for violating ethics of scholarship.

If The New York Times decides to include this book in the Bestseller List, then it should be listed under “Fiction”; for that is what this book is. Maybe that will send a message to Mr.Corsi and others that works of this nature are not worth the paper they are printed on.

“Parts of his latest book, “The Obama Nation,” have already been refuted, but the book will nonetheless land at the top of our best seller list this weekend.”

Probably forced to the top via the “command buying” of Republican lying gutter scum.

It is a shame that the MSM are such cannibals, they attempted to camp out around Obama’s vacation spot. The gall! Obama was right to kick them out!

I’m glad Obama kicked the reporter out of his fundraiser; the MSM are not sympathetic–or even neutral–toward Obama.

Actually Shenderson it sounds like it was geared for McCain supporters. Thanks for playing.

Admist all of these media blow-ups in this election… We begin to lose focus on the candidates and look at their lives and the people surrounding him and the resulting “super breaking news with a**-pounding force” as if it was an unescapable suction of a black hole in the American universe. Lets all turn the televisions, X out of your NYT.com page, and go knock on your neighbor’s door and see how he feels about it if you want a true American opinion. I’m convinced if MTV or VH1 got a hold of the non-existing licensing rights to the ’08 election happenings, it would make an amazing reality show (featuring flavor flav as host) and everyone would just watch that…. At least we would just laugh at it and not actually talk this bull seriously!!! comeon!

I heard that Hillary will deliver the nominating speech, demonstrating once and for all that PUMA is dead and that she wants Democrats to win this year.

Obama’s stance on abortion is very far to the left. In 2002, as an Illinois legislator, Obama voted against the Induced Infant Liability Act, which would have protected babies that survived late-term abortions. That same year a similar federal law, the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, was signed by President Bush. Only 15 members of the U.S. House opposed it, and it passed the Senate unanimously on a voice vote. Essentially, Obama believes that a child born alive must be killed if the mother had earlier requested an abortion and the abortion was unsuccessful.