Dies ist die HTML-Version der Datei http://www.stetzerelectric.com/filters/research/health_effects.pdf.
G o o g l e erzeugt beim Web-Durchgang automatische HTML-Versionen von Dokumenten.
The health effects of electrical pollution
Page 1
The health effects
of
electrical pollution
The National Foundation for Alternative Medicine
1629 K Street NW
Suite 402
Washington, D.C. 20006
202.463.4900

Page 2
One of the most potent contaminants
is radio-frequency radiation.
Radio-frequency radiation
O
f particular concern is the
high-frequency current
created by computers and
other electronic devices, which is often
called “dirty current.” This current is
created by numerous devices and is
conducted nearly everywhere. The
wiring in buildings then acts as
A
mericans are surrounded by
electrical
devices
c o m p u t e r s ,
VCRs and a plethora of
household gadgets and
consumer appliances.
There is also the
assumption that the
electricity (and associated
electrical phenomena) are
safely confined to the
wires carrying electricity
and to the electrical
devices themselves.
For a variety of reasons,
including the very design
of
the
electrical
distribution system, this
assumption is no longer
valid.
Electricity is a trusted
component
of
contemporary civilization.
Few notice the poles, wires,
substations and transformers that
deliver electricity. Fewer still pay any
attention to the hidden lattice of wires
in the walls of homes, offices, churches,
factories and schools.
Yet all contribute to an increasingly
dangerous electrical environment that
has largely escaped systematic
monitoring. The increased demand for
electricity, and the proliferation of
computers and other electronic devices
have markedly increased our exposure
to electrical phenomena. These
phenomena are a ubiquitous presence
in our lives, albeit invisible and
odorless.
There is the widespread (and
mistaken) assumption that our electrical
environment has been carefully studied
and monitored and, save for a few
exceptions, found to be harmless.
The truth is that the millions of
Americans live and work in
environments that subject them to a
variety of harmful electric phenomena.
The health effects of electrical pollution
antennae for the current, silently and
insidiously assaulting those who play
and work nearby.
In other words, the wires
that deliver electricity have
also become conduits for
deadly high-frequency
radiation, a form of
electrical pollution that has
largely escaped attention
by
the
medical
community.
The
increased
prevalence of this radio-
frequency current has
coincided with an
alarming increase in the
prevalence of ailments
such as fibromyalgia,
chronic fatigue syndrome,
attention deficit disorder,
diabetes and asthma.
Innumerable studies
have shown there is no “safe” level of
exposure to radio-frequency current,
which now routinely flows through the
wiring of homes, schools and offices.
It is a deadly “byproduct” of our
electronic age.
Pervasive and deadly
E
lectrical pollution is
indiscriminate. It affects
young and old, women and
men, mothers and infants, the rich and
poor, secretaries and farmers, doctors
and lawyers, factory workers and
scientists.
Until its unsuspecting victims take
action to reduce their exposure,
symptoms worsen. There is no relief,
no cure, no hope. Lives become a
numbing maelstrom of despair and a
desperate attempt to alleviate
symptoms.
The harmful biological effects of
exposure to electrical pollution have
been established in numerous studies
conducted during the past 50 years.
Several countries have established
‘I have no doubt in my
mind that at the present
time that the greatest
polluting element in the
earth's environment is the
proliferation of electro-
magnetic fields. I con-
sider that to be far greater
on a global scale than
warming...
Robert O. Becker, M. D., Author
of Cross Currents and The Body
Electric:
The green area in the oscilloscope display shown above
represents ‘dirty’ power that contaminates normal (60 Hertz)
electricity.
1

Page 3
standards limiting exposure to EMF,
“dirty” current and other sources.
In the United States,
however, environments are
seldom monitored for
electrical pollution. The
limited standards governing
“dirty” current, for example,
are applied only in industrial
settings, and then only when
levels are high enough to
affect computers, motors and
other equipment.
Until recently, people had no
way of monitoring levels of
dirty current in the
environment. The introduction
of a relatively inexpensive
meter that could be plugged
into a conventional outlet to
monitor levels of this current
led to some startling
revelations.
Hundreds of people found
that their health problems
worsened during exposure to
dirty current, and that they
were exposed to this current in
a variety of locations. The
invention of a convenient filter
that removes radio-frequency
radiation provided noticeable
and immediate relief to
thousands of people. Some
have managed to create or find
environments where the levels
are lower. However, most have found
it impossible to find environments
where levels are uniformly safe. .
The following selected accounts are
just a few of hundreds of similar stories
that dedicated investigators have
encountered during the past four years.
It should be remembered that these
investigations occurred outside the
framework of institutional support that
usually funds studies of this type.
The integrity of these investigators
is beyond reproach. They conducted
these studies at considerable personal
and financial sacrifice. They were
conducted by investigators who have
desperately sought to have the scientific
and medical community thoroughly and
systematically investigate their
concerns.
Their requests have been ignored.
Instead, they have often been subjected
to scathing criticism and
ridicule.
Most of those who have
learned that their health has
been adversely affected by
electrical pollution had
previously engaged in a
lengthy, fruitless and costly
search to ascertain the source
of their ailments, and to seek
relief.
They were increasingly
debilitated by their ailments,
though they sought the best
medical advice they could
afford. They became
discouraged and desperate as
they lost the ability to
function as productive
members of society. Many
face impoverishment. They
were caught in a vortex of
despair, whose causes
seemed beyond the reach of
science. Some of these
conditions acquired labels.
Others didn’t.
There was no relief beyond
palliative care. A cure
seemed beyond hope.
All
experienced
remarkable improvements in
their conditions after
removing radio-frequency current
from their household wiring.
A public health crisis
A
basic precept of science
developed in the 14th century
is known as Ockham’s razor,
which can be paraphrased as accepting
the theory that results in the most
accurate predictions.
The symptoms associated with
overexposure to radio-frequency
radiation (also known as radio wave
sickness) clearly describe the
symptoms associated with many of the
supposedly inexplicable ailments that
have become more common in recent
decades.
Symptoms of exposure to radio-
frequency radiation (radio wave sickness)
Neurological: headaches, dizziness, nausea, diffi-
culty concentrating, memory loss, irritability,
depression, anxiety, insomnia, fatigue, weakness,
tremors, muscle spasms, numbness, tingling, altered
reflexes, muscle and joint paint, leg/foot pain, "Flu-
like" symptoms, fever. More severe reactions can
include seizures, paralysis, psychosis and stroke.
Cardiac: palpitations, arrhythmias, pain or pressure
in the chest, low or high blood pressure, slow or fast
heart rate, shortness of breath.
Respiratory: sinusitis, bronchitis, pneumonia,
asthma.
Dermatological: skin rash, itching, burning, facial
flushing.
Ophthalmologic: pain or burning in the eyes,
pressure in/behind the eyes, deteriorating vision,
floaters, cataracts.
Others: digestive problems; abdominal pain;
enlarged thyroid, testicular/ovarian pain; dryness of
lips, tongue, mouth, eyes; great thirst; dehydration;
nosebleeds; internal bleeding; altered sugar metabo-
lism; immune abnormalities; redistribution of metals
within the body; hair loss; pain in the teeth; deterio-
rating fillings; impaired sense of smell; ringing in the
ears.
(excerpted from No Place To Hide by Arthur
Firstenberg, April 2001)
Dr. Martin Graham, emeritus
professor of computer science and
electrical engineering, University of
California, Berkeley, and inventor of
a filter that removes radio-frequency
radiation from household wiring.
2

Page 4
The relationship between exposure to
radio-frequency radiation and these
ailments clearly warrants additional
independent investigation.
Investigations of human health
concerns and electrical pollution are
now left solely to the discretion of
electrical utilities. This is unacceptable
and is unlikely to change. In Wisconsin,
for example, state health officials have
not undertaken a single investigation of
the health complaints of farm families
with concerns about electrical
pollution, even though these families
have requested such an investigation for
almost 30 years.
Any discussion of electrical
phenomena involves terms that are
unfamiliar to most people. This is true
in any detailed discussion of a scientific
topic. However, it poses a particularly
formidable obstacle to the public’s
understanding of the problem because
the issue is often framed exclusively in
technical language. This has proven to
be a formidable barrier in attempts to
draw public attention to the issue,
especially as the objectivity of many
investigators is in doubt.
It need not be this way. Electrical
pollution is analogous to water
pollution. “Clean” water enters our
households and it leaves via a separate
route after it becomes “dirty.” The same
is true of electricity, only the
contaminated current doesn’t leave via
a separate route. Instead, it has been
allowed to intermingle with clean
current – and has been allowed to enter
the environment by a variety of paths.
As with polluted water, there are
several electrical pollutants. They have
synergistic effects. Examining each in
isolation fails to accurately assess their
harmful biological effects.
While there are legitimate concerns
over what levels and types of electrical
pollution are acceptable, there is no
uncertainty over the fact that electrical
pollution is present in our environment
-and no uncertainty whatsoever that
there is no safe exposure level for radio-
frequency radiation.
The most immediate concern is to
develop methods to eliminate or
prevent exposure to harmful levels.
Also, health officials should be
encouraged to utilize the instruments
that accurately measure electrical
pollution and develop the appropriate
protocols for their use. This should not
be left to the electric utilities.
Time to begin
This is an auspicious time to begin
such an effort because investigators
with the academic credentials and
technical competence have already
created much of the foundation for this
work. Such investigations would be
prohibitively expensive if these
resources were not available.
Moreover, even if the resources were
available to fund these investigations
(which would initially require hundreds
of thousands of dollars), the objectivity
of the results would be subject to
question unless (as is now possible)
the complete independence of the
investigators could be assured.
The following general factors should
be considered when considering the
experiences of victims of electrical
pollution:
• They involve a wide variety of health
concerns. In medicine, this often
detracts from credibility as researchers
increasingly seek to link specific
disease agents or factors with specific
ailments. However, the accounts are
consistent with the pervasive assault on
the immune system characteristic of
electrical pollution, and with the
heterogeneous nature of electrical
phenomena, and the wide divergence
in routes and duration of exposure.
• Seldom is there a complete reversal
of symptoms or a “cure.” This appears
to reflect the inability to achieve an
environment free of electrical pollution.
• Electrical pollution exacerbates
many health conditions, although there
appears to be a cluster of symptoms
common to all forms of overexposure.
•There appears to be a “threshold” of
exposure, after which recovery
becomes more problematic and
sensitivity increases.
•The medical community seldom, if
ever, considers electrical pollution in
the etiology of ailments.
• “Stray voltage” research, which
involves the short-term exposure of
cows to low levels of “clean” electricity
is not germane to the human health
concerns addressed here, even though
it has often been cited as “proof” that
electrical pollution has no adverse
effects on human health.
• Many of those affected by electrical
pollution require immediate relief. The
most relevant test of whether electrical
pollution is a human health concern is
to provide an environment that is free
of all sources of electrical pollution.
The particular levels and routes of
exposure that are of most concern in
each environment can be addressed
later.
• Providing an environment that is
free of electrical pollution would be the
simplest, least expensive (and most
powerful) test of the hypotheses
concerning the relationship between
electrical pollution and the adverse
effects on human health.
The “Stetzerizer,” the Graham/Stetzer
original filter that can be plugged into
household electric receptacles to re-
move radio-frequency radiation.
3

Page 5
Dan Hager
Dan Hager, 50, is a large man, whose
joviality belies the health problems that
doctors said were supposed to have
killed him by now.
He’s had a variety of occupations,
including stints as a welder, machinist
and driving trucks and buses. He had
no history of serious health problems
when, eight years ago, he was nearly
crippled by aching joints and pain in
the lower back. There were times
when his feet were so sensitive he
could barely walk. He would often
inexplicably lose his balance and fall.
Numerous doctors were unable to
ascertain the cause of his health
problems, although all agreed that his
health was deteriorating. Hager
eventually was prescribed 12
medications for pain, swelling,
seizures and depression in an
increasingly futile attempt to
stay healthy enough so he could
maintain the campground he
and his wife, Marge, operated
in central Wisconsin.
Two years ago, a neighbor
recounted how her health
improved after she installed
filters to lower levels of
electrical pollution. After
studying the information she
provided, Hager realized his
symptoms mimicked those of
radio wave sickness, right
down to the pain in his teeth.
Hager decided to try it himself,
and made several filters.
“Right away, I felt more
energetic. The headaches went
away and my sleep was more
restful,” he said. He was no
longer plagued by sleep apnea
and no longer prone to losing
his balance. He subsequently
reduced the number of prescriptions to
four.
Doctors were never able to identify
the cause of his ailments, although some
predicted he would never recover the
mobility and strength he lost and
predicted that the deterioration would
progress. One ascribed his ailments to
nerve damage. Hager concurs with
the diagnosis.
Hager believes his nerves were
damaged by the flow of current
through his body. He links the start of
his health problems to a change in the
electrical distribution system in the
area to accommodate the increased
demand for electricity. Then, too, the
campground is next to a lake in a low-
lying region, conditions that favor the
flow of electricity through the ground.
Hager has employed several methods
to reduce ground currents, but none
are completely effective.
His pain was alleviated after a doctor
treated him for injuries usually
associated with electrocution. Hager
has purchased several oscilloscopes
and tries to help neighbors understand
the risks posed by electrical pollution.
He had back surgery in 1998 and was
very slow to recover. “It took two
months to be able to walk out the front
door and go about 30 feet,” he says. He
attributes the slow healing to electrical
pollution.
His sister has been diagnosed with
rheumatoid arthritis and struggled for
almost a year while doctors tried to find
the right medications for her. Many
were ineffective and had undesirable
side effects. Dan measured the radio
frequencies in her home and installed
filters a year ago. Her mobility has
improved, there’s less swelling in her
hands and she sleeps much better. “Her
doctors “ can’t believe how well she’s
doing,” Dan says. She attributes her
improved health to the filters.
Catherine
Kleiber
Catherine Kleiber’s serious
health problems began in 1996,
six months after moving to a farm
she and her husband, Dan,
operated in southern Wisconsin.
She was 23 and until then, hadn’t
experienced any serious health
problems. Both were recent
graduates of the University of
Wisconsin-Madison.
The symptoms initially included
a sore, dry throat, fatigue, and a
low-grade fever and chills. She
was unable to concentrate.
Doctors couldn’t identify a cause.
Tests for throat infections were
negative. Three years later, she
was diagnosed with chronic
fatigue syndrome.
Catherine noticed unusual
patterns in her symptoms. They
were worse at certain times (on
Saturday night and Sundays, for
example) and during certain weather
conditions (worse when it rained, better
during droughty conditions). There
The illustration above, which shows the high frequency
current riding on the 60-cycle waveform, was mea-
sured in a classroom occupied by a teacher who re-
cently died of a brain tumor. The teacher in the ad-
joining room had recently died from leukemia. Dr.
Vitaly Reznik, professor of hygiene and epidemiol-
ogy in the Republic of Kazakhastan and an expert on
the effects of radio-frequency radiation, said the en-
ergy contained in the waveform was twice that con-
sidered safe by that nation’s standards, which are based
on ‘high-frequency components that known to cause
an array of health problems in humans,’ including
cancer and leukemia.
Relief after receiving
medical treatment
for electrocution.
Continued on page 6
4

Page 6
A nurse’s perspective
Char Sbraggia, the nurse for the
school district, wrote that there has
been a remarkable decline in the se-
verity and incidence of asthma
among students after filters were
installed.
Many students previously re-
quired nebulizer treatments once or
twice a day while at school, she
wrote. During the year after filters
were installed, she didn’t adminis-
ter one nebulizer treatment and “of
the 37 students with inhalers, only
three of them use the inhaler for their
exercise-induced asthma before Phy
Ed,” she wrote.
“Teachers are stating they are less
fatigued and tired,” she wrote. “The
sense of smell came back for me. I
lost it for three years and the doc-
tors said it was my allergies.”
She also reported that students
“seem to have more energy and
seem less tired.” Members of the
staff also report a reduction in their
use of allergy medications and in the
incidence of migraines.
W
hen
filters
were
installed
in
an
elementary school in
Wisconsin recently, staff members
quickly noticed a remarkable difference
in how they felt and an improvement in
the behavior of the students.
The guidance counselor at the school
said the migraine headaches she had
experienced six months after starting to
work at the school disappeared. She also
discontinued her allergy medication.
“I feel more motivated and refreshed
to do my job in the best manner I can.
Overall, I feel our students and staff have
greatly benefited from these filters. I hope
that someday all school districts in
Wisconsin will be required to have their
schools tested and filters installed if the
need is there,” she wrote.
“Ever since the filters were installed in
the building I have been feeling much
better. I do not get headaches and I do
not feel tired all the time. Also, I have
more energy than before the filters,” wrote
Ruth Pfaff, the school secretary.
Lisa Gunderson, a teacher at the school
for five years, said she had experienced
numerous health problems since she
started working at the school, including
“extreme fatigue, headaches,
forgetfulness, and increased anxiety over
minor happenings.” A doctor prescribed
anxiety medication, which did not relieve
the symptoms.
“I had considerable doubts about
electrical pollution being the reason for
these symptoms but was pleasantly
surprised and extremely pleased to find
relief a short time after filters were
installed in our building. I am not
currently taking any medications and am
feeling great. My symptoms are no longer
present and I have not had any changes
in my work habits or lifestyle,” Ms
Gunderson wrote.
Shanon Rodenberg, also a teacher,
wrote that she did “not have the same
asthma symptoms” after the filters were
installed.
“The other thing I have noticed is my
memory is better,” she wrote.
Constance M. Alvin, The reading
specialist at the school for 10 years said
she had experienced “fatigue, headaches,
stress, and general feelings of malaise
throughout the school year, with the end
of the year being the most unpleasant.
These changes were pronounced enough
to prompt my husband to comment each
year that when June came around he would
get his ‘real wife’ back.”
Soon after filters were installed, she
noticed she was not as fatigued after
parent-teacher conferences in January and
March, and her concentration improved.
“I have not changed my work habits or
anything in my personal life that would
contribute to these changes I have
noticed,” she wrote
Mindoro Elementary School, N181
State Rd. 108, Melrose, WI 54642; (608)
857-3410
One teacher’s experience
November 30, 2003
My life changed one year ago.
The past 3.5 years of my life are filled
with sad memories of serious health
problems. The list of my symptoms
includes fatigue, memory loss, facial
flushing, headaches, numbness, loss of
taste and smell, eye irritation, sleep
disturbances, double vision, sinus
infections, and bronchitis.
These health conditions began when
school started and gradually went away
throughout the summer months. I
missed more school in one year than I
had in the previous 10 years of
teaching. I went from doctor to doctor
searching for answers. I had two MRI’s
of my brain, blood tests, neurological
examines and yet no answers. I went to
my optometrist, chiropractor, allergist,
general practitioner, and neurologist.
Everyone was concerned, but no one
had any answers. So my life went for
the next three years. I was finally
diagnosed with benign MS.
My students suffered. It was a 50-50
chance I would call them their correct
names. The days and weeks blended
into a time in my life I barely remember
except for the pain of being me. I was
so busy trying not to fall when I went
for a walk while I had double vision I
missed the sights of spring. For years
I would go to bed by 6 p.m. so I could
get up for school the next day. I was
always exhausted. Last year my
headaches were so severe I didn’t make
it a complete week for the first three
months of school. I was miserable. I
had decided at that point I would give
up teaching in hopes of getting my good
health back.
The only people I let into my sad little
world were my parents and brothers.
Everyone felt helpless. When I went to
bed at night I would often cry in my
pillow to hide the true fear I felt. I was
trapped in a horrible world with no hope
in sight.
One year ago everything changed.
One school’s experience
Continued on following page
5

Page 7
seemed no logical reasons for those
patterns until she realized that they
coincided with periods of peak
electrical demand and changes in soil
conductivity.
Catherine learned about the
relationship between her condition and
electrical pollution after reading an
article in an agricultural publication
about farmers’ attempts to deal with so-
called “stray voltage.”
She contacted the industrial
electrician who was helping farmers and
immediately turned off the power in the
house. She says there was a “definite
improvement” in her health and that of
her husband. Both immediately
experienced more restful sleep, for
example.
They also installed several types of
filters and have employed a variety of
measures to limit their exposure to
electrical pollution. All have had
beneficial health effects. It has been
impossible to completely eliminate
electrical pollution from their
environment, however. She is adversely
affected by the high-frequency bursts
of current create by strobe lights on
nearby cellular towers, for example.
Since learning about electrical
pollution, Catherine has been tireless
in her efforts to warn others of the
danger. She established a web site about
the topic (www.electricalpollution.com)
and frequently addresses agricultural
and other groups, encouraging them to
seek legislative remedies for the
problems.
“People whose health has been most
affected are most interested (in
electrical pollution) because they have
the most to gain,” she says.
Shivani Arjuna
Shivani Arjuna, 59, doesn’t think she
would be alive today if she hadn’t
learned about electrical pollution.
Two years ago, she began to
experience incidents in which her blood
pressure and heart rate would suddenly
skyrocket, accompanied by extreme
heart arrhythmias even though she had
no history of heart problems and her
blood pressure had always been low..
She was conveyed to the emergency
room of the local hospital twice; doctors
couldn’t find anything wrong. After
$18,000 in tests, including an MRI of
her brain, doctors couldn’t arrive at a
diagnosis and eventually said she was
experiencing “panic attacks.”
Her life was characterized by months
of poor sleep, She usually required two
hours to get to sleep, due to tension and
severe intestinal spasms that began as
soon as she laid down. She would
awaken every couple of hours. She
thought her problems might somehow
be related to her bed, but conditions
didn’t improve when at other locations
in her home. (All those areas later
proved to have high levels of radio-
frequency radiation.)
“I was so weak I felt as if I was made
of paper,” she says. “I was nearly an
invalid. My husband cared for me.”
Homeopathic remedies alleviated some
of the symptoms, but she obtained real
relief only after reducing radio-
frequency levels around the house.
Most homes require 20 filters. It took
37 filters to reduce levels of dirty
current in her home. Industrial
electrician Dave Stetzer said levels of
radio-frequency current in her home
were among the highest he had
measured. (Her utility said its
measurements, which were made at the
same time, revealed nothing of
concern.)
‘I was nearly
an invalid.’
Sicker when the soil is
more conductive
My school brought in Mr. Dave
Stetzer, a power quality expert. He
identified problems in our electrical
environment. Mr. Stetzer filtered our
school to eliminate the dirty electricity
riding on the line. My headaches
stopped immediately and so did the
exhaustion that was my life. My health
from that point has been wonderful.
People who know me best see me as a
new person. A person they use to know,
but hadn’t seen for years. All signs and
symptoms of benign MS are gone. The
health concerns that once consumed my
life are no longer an issue. I once again
enjoy life.
I attribute this change in my life to the
filters that surround my world. The
filters that eliminated the electrical
pollution we are all exposed to every
day, everywhere. I have found filters
to be a simple solution that changed my
life and a countless number of people I
know.
I am forever thankful to have my life
back!
Angela Olstad
Teacher/Principal
Olstad@mel-min.k12.wi.us
The state health department had
attributed the problems at the school to
mold and undertook two projects,
costing more than $100,000, to correct
the problem, with no discernible
decrease in the health problems at the
school. The cost of the filters —
$18,000 for three buildings, Olstad says.
People tend to take her account
seriously, she says, because they
remember how sick she was just a year
ago when her face always had a
purplish-red tint.
She has asked officials with the state
to investigate her concerns and to
consider taking similar action in other
schools around the state. She has not
received a reply.
Utility representatives have criticized
the school’s actions as a waste of money.
Continued from previous page
Continued from page 4
6

Page 8
Arjuna is now so electrically sensitive
that even the arcing in a car’s electrical
system affects her and prevents her
from driving. She is essentially
homebound as the electrical pollution
in most public places affects her
severely.
She and her husband have taken
several measures to reduce her
exposure to harmful electrical
phenomena, including the installation
of shielded phone lines and modifying
the hot water heating system, which
conducts ground current, to reduce her
exposure in the kitchen to “bearable”
levels. They have also stopped using
several electrical heating baseboards
that were broadcasting radio-frequency
radiation.
She now gives workshops on the
effects of electrical pollution and
methods to reduce exposure. She has
learned that many people are bothered
by electrical pollution, even though
they aren’t as electrically sensitive as
she is.
Once people have experienced an
uncontaminated environment, they
realize how bad they feel in
contaminated environments, she says.
Those who experience only polluted
environments have no idea how they are
affected.
The Jansky Family
The health problems of the Jansky
family became worse about a year ago.
Everyone in the family began
experiencing bouts of unexplained
illnesses, including stomach cramps
and headaches. One son was
hospitalized with severe headaches,
although doctors didn’t provide a
diagnosis. Tom, 45, was not as severely
affected as his six children and wife,
Brenda, 42, which he attributes to the
fact that he worked away from the
house. Their children are home-
schooled and remained at home all day.
The most worrisome development
was the diagnosis of diabetes in their
son, Daniel, 11. Their daughter was
diagnosed with diabetes at 10 months
of age; doctors said it was unusual for
the disease to afflict two children in the
same family in this manner.
Tom read an article about electrical
pollution. “When I read it, I thought,
‘Wow. That sounded just like us,’” said
Tom. He had measurements made in
their home and installed 20 filters
immediately after learning there were
high levels of radio-frequency current
in the home’s wiring.
“The family’s health problems pretty
much disappeared,” says Tom. Most
surprising to them was a dramatic
reduction in the insulin requirements of
their two diabetic children.
They have confirmed the relationship
between electrical pollution and insulin
levels several times. For three weeks
during the summer, they vacationed in
a remote area of Montana, which was
free of electrical pollution. The blood
sugar levels
of both children dropped and remained
“very stable,” says Tom. Brenda notes
that blood sugar levels remained stable,
regardless of the children’s level of
activity.
In April, the children’s blood sugar
levels began climbing and became
difficult to manage. When the family
visited a friend who lived more than 30
miles away, their children’s blood sugar
levels decreased markedly, (and are still
declining), which they subsequently
attributed to the fact that their friend’s
house was located in a sandy region
where the soil was less conductive.
They remained at the house for several
days to confirm their initial observation.
“I’m convinced this (electrical
pollution) is an issue,” says Tom. They
have shared their observations with
their children’s doctors, who have
attributed their experiences to
“coincidence.”
Nancy H.
Nancy H., who wants to remain
anonymous., 42, often chokes up as she
recites the health problems that have
plagued her family, a litany of grief and
sorrow that is disproportionately large
for a family of five. She is divorced with
four children.
The harrowing chronicle began more
than 15 years ago when she moved with
her family to a small town in north
central Wisconsin. At the time, she
instinctively knew something was
“wrong.”
It was a presentment that she has since
learned to trust although at the time, she
couldn’t identify what in the
environment had led to the feeling.
The health problems worsened when
she moved to a house in a rural area.
Immediately after the move, her infant
son, who had placidly slept through the
night for several months, began
doubling up in pain and screaming, for
reasons that doctors weren’t able to
ascertain.
Her children always seemed sick with
colds, fevers, congestion and slight
temperatures. Her boys were shorter
than normal, One son experienced
severe growth pains and aching legs.
Her daughter had crippling migraines.
Her two older children developed
severe ear infections One son suffered
a 50 percent hearing loss, the other
son’s loss of hearing was even more
extensive.
During one harrowing year, her sons
in first, third and fifth grade were
lethargic and suffered from severe
bowel problems characterized by food
passing through nearly undigested.
They had dark circles under their eyes,
slept excessively, with poor growth and
learning difficulties.
“The boys would be playing, and
suddenly they would get headaches and
stomach aches,” says Nancy. A team of
doctors at a major metropolitan hospital
confirmed that the children were sick,
A remarkable
improvement in their
children’s diabetes
7

Page 9
but could not diagnose either the
ailment or the cause. One doctor
suspected cancer.
In the search for answers, Nancy had
the water and air tested, stopped eating
homegrown vegetables in case there
was something in the soil, and
eliminated any foods (such as Alar-
treated apples) that had been
implicated in any type of ailment. She
sought medical help so frequently that
some doctors questioned whether she
was fabricating the ailments to get
attention. It was one more sickening
obstacle for a heartsick mother trying
to alleviate the suffering of her children.
Nothing helped but exactly one year
and one day after the boys became sick,
the intestinal ailments inexplicably
vanished.
Nancy’s health had also declined.
After suffering from severe fatigue,
weakness and inability to concentrate,
she was diagnosed with multiple
sclerosis. And although her daughter
didn’t suffer as much as the boys, her
fingernails would slough off and her
hair would fall out by the handful.
Nancy now thinks that the conductive
metal grid in the suspended ceiling of
her sons’ bedroom may explain why
they were often affected more than her
daughter.
Electrical appliances in the house
often failed. Nancy kept boxes of
telephones that had gone bad because
she somehow felt that they might be
related to what her family had
experienced. Light bulbs frequently
burned out. Other major electrical
appliances required frequent repairs.
On April 2, 2001, she installed filters
in her house. Nancy says the family’s
health improved noticeably within a
week. She began thinking clearly and
was no longer fatigued. Others
commented that she no longer stuttered
and stammered.
She uses a meter to monitor electrical
conditions and notices that her
condition worsens when levels of
electrical pollution increase.
“It’s a world of difference,” Nancy
says. Her children took longer to
improve but they, too, have more
energy. “For the first time in their lives,
I don’t have to take them to the doctor
anymore,” Nancy said.
Marcy Fry
Marcy Fry can trace the downward
trajectory in her health to the birth of
her second child 16 years ago. A
subsequent temporary diagnosis of an
underactive thyroid, which went away
without medication in a few months,
explained some of the symptoms, but
not the panic attacks, the exhaustion,
the lack of restful sleep and jolting
awake in a total panicked state at the
same time in the middle of the night.
Her condition worsened and she
could no longer work after her office
was moved to a former school whose
electrical system hadn’t been updated
to accommodate computers and other
electronic equipment.
She has been off work since June 4,
1999, when, she was finally diagnosed
with chronic fatigue syndrome,
fibromyalgia, panic disorder and
irritable bowl syndrome. She linked
these ailments to electrical pollution
when she participated in a preliminary
study of filters. During the study, the
filters would be turned on and off at
intervals. Participants in the study
weren’t told when the filters were on,
but Marcy says she knew immediately.
The study was conducted over the
holiday season, a period of peak
electrical demand. “It was a double
whammy when they turned them off,”
she says.
She’s had the filters in her house ever
since. She is still exhausted and very
thirsty most of her waking hours, but
she is no longer as badly afflicted with
irritable bowel syndrome, nor as prone
to the bouts of anger, panic and mood
swings that characterized her behavior
before she was forced to quit her job as
a recreation director.
She believes her health is still strongly
affected by electrical pollution. The
filters removed radio-frequency current
from her home’s electrical distribution
system but not from the rest of the
environment. Measurements have
shown that her home environment is in
a sea of electrical pollution, including
ground currents.
She worries about her children, who
often have trouble focusing, a condition
that she also attributes to electrical
pollution.
Kurt Gutknecht
Kurt Gutknecht, 56, is a journalist
who has written extensively about
electrical pollution.
More than four years ago, he asked
why dairy farmers in Wisconsin were
still complaining about so-called “stray
voltage” almost three decades after the
issue was first publicized.
He found more than he anticipated –
what he now calls “the nation’s largest
public health problem.” He discovered
that humans were as sick from electrical
pollution as livestock, and that the
problem wasn’t confined to rural areas.
After his articles appeared, he was
inundated with calls from farm families
who had lost their farms due to the
problem, with no hope of restitution.
He visited dozens of farms in three
states. Most families at locations where
levels were high also had severe health
problems.
‘The nation’s
largest public
health problem’
Feeling worse
when neighbors use
more electricity
8

Page 10
He says the problem persists in large
part because the government has ceded
oversight to utility interests. “The
utilities’ ability to control access to the
technology used to measure electrical
pollution lets them bury the issue under
a cloud of technical jargon and half-
truths,” he says.
But he says the most disturbing aspect
of the problem is the fact that the
government, with the complicity of
selected researchers, has abandoned all
pretense of independent oversight and
objectivity. “I was sickened at what
farm families experienced when they
lost their farms due to electrical
pollution. Unfortunately, anyone who
tries to get help for the problem receives
the same treatment.”