Hello Mark, the ME66 is a short gun mic and the ME67 is a long gun mic. If = the choice was mine I would go for the 67 as it has far better reach. I use= two ME66's as a stereo pair for my wide sound
=C2=A0 Hi Everyone, I am looking at my next acquisition for my gear and want to pu= rchase a more directional mic. I have the Rode Blimp so it would be importa= nt that the mic fit into this. It's a
Hi Everyone, I am looking at my next acquisition for my gear and want to pu= rchase a more directional mic. I have the Rode Blimp so it would be importa= nt that the mic fit into this. It's a toss up
-- In m("yahoogroups.com,","naturerecordists"); "stwebvanuatu" < m("...","stwebvanuatu"); > = wrote: now uploaded some files to this group. I didn't make a folder and you'll h= ave to scroll down to
The specifications that came with my Sennheiser K6 ME67 say that the sensitivity is rated at 35 mV/Pa (rather than 50 mV/Pa). I've had my mic for a while, maybe there's a new model out or something?
I have a MKH70, bought used with a rycote softie suspension and windcover off ebay, for $830, so don't be so sure about price. There was a virtually new one with the full rycote setup that went for $
Stephen, Handling noise should not be a big issue with the ME66/67. I use an ME66 with an Olympus LS10 recorder (similar to the Sony), with XLR to miniplug connectors. I don't apply any low cut to ei
(both of which have the same sensitivity) and uses it with a Sony recorder = (high gain pre-amps). I've used ME66's in several occasions with the Rycote softie displayed in t= he following link and i
Hello Stephen... First, let me explain that I have and use both the ME67 and a pair of the ME66 microphones. The ME67 is a bit harder to handle without generating handling noise for two reasons. One,
I don't own that mic. But I did own some SM81's. And their sensitivities = proved more trouble than it was worth. And even though they were the bette= r mic to what I've been using in most of the ot
hello Tony: Good question and idea. Lots was just said (last week) about this mic, so try the archives . . I also attach one of my own responses . . Good luck! -- best regards, Marty Michener MIST So
A handle which helps to reduce handling noise can be made using a piece of 1=C2=94 dowel. Drill a hole in one end to glue in an appropriate stud to sc= rew into the mic holder, Then wrap and glue a l
I was thinking that Gianni's and Raimund's tests on the MT24/96's mic pre are pretty much in agreement and consistent with some experience we've built-up with MD's pre performance. Its my understandi
Mic's like the ME67 are meant to dampen room acoustics. The difference between a ME67 and a ME64 is quite small. As Rob's and other's tests have shown, there is no need for a preamp, unless the gain
The ME67's possibly incorrect 10 dBA self-noise value is listed on sennheiser's web site, under Techn. Data: <http://www.sennheiser.com/sennheiser/icm_eng.nsf/root/products_access ories_mke_03285?Ope
Yes, handling noise is very much a problem with this mike and any high gain= mic. There are a number of DIY shock mounts that you can make or purchase = the Sennhieser shock mount and use a boom. You
Hello again, I would really appreciate a response from someone who has a ME66 or ME67 (b= oth of which have the same sensitivity) and uses it with a Sony recorder (h= igh gain pre-amps). Is handling
Hello again, Thanks for the many useful responses to my handling noise problem. I have now uploaded some files to this group. I didn't make a folder and you'll have to scroll down to find them in the
Stephen, The low rumbles you are hearing in your recordings are definitely NOT normal. I will leave it to someone else to suggest what might be causing this severe case of low rumbling handling noise