The sheer lunacy of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant criminal Georgia cracker)

That approach is illogical, since if it
is wrong to end the lives of animals, it is
*far worse* to keep those same animals from
getting to have any life at all.
Fuckwit - 07/30/1999

The animals that will be raised for us to eat
are more than just "nothing", because they
*will* be born unless something stops their
lives from happening. Since that is the case,
if something stops their lives from happening,
whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
them of the life they otherwise would have had.
Fuckwit - 12/09/1999

Yes, it is the unborn animals that will be
born if nothing prevents that from happening,
that would experience the loss if their lives
are prevented.
Fuckwit - 08/01/2000

What gives you the right to want to deprive
them [unborn animals] of having what life they
could have?
Fuckwit - 10/12/2001

NONE of these statements by Fuckwit is a "mistake", in
the sense that he didn't "mean" it. They *all* imply
the same thing: Fuckwit - David Fuckwit Harrison -
believes non-existent animals have some kind of
"pre-existence" that means they have interests, or
specifically, an interest: an interest in coming into
existence and "getting to experience life".

The reason - the ONLY reason - Fuckwit is avoiding
addressing the first of these quotes:

That approach is illogical, since if it
is wrong to end the lives of animals, it is
*far worse* to keep those same animals from
getting to have any life at all.
Fuckwit - 07/30/1999

that I have been asking about over the last couple of
days is that, as stupid as Fuckwit is, he knows that
acknowledging the unavoidable, unmistakable implication
of it - that non-existent animals have "interests" -
paints him as a lunatic. He *IS* a lunatic, of course,
as *all* the other quotes imply exactly the same thing,
and he believes *all* of them to this day.

Fuckwit - David Harrison, Fuckwit in Buford, GA (jesus
fucking christ - Buford! it doesn't get more redneck
cousin-fucking hick than that) - BELIEVES that
non-existent animals:

- are an interest-holding *something*
- can suffer a "loss"
- can be "deprived" of something (the "experience" of
life)
- can be "denied" something
- can be the victims of "unfairness"

And the list goes on and on.

Fuckwit believes that it is "worse" for non-existent
animals to prevent "them" from living. He believes,
undeniably, that some grave injustice is being done to
non-existent animals if they don't come into existence.

Fuckwit is a fuckwit.

> 2030 Je
>

Fuck off, Lesley. Anyone who wants it has long known
where to find it. If - IF, Lesley - you post the
entire address and some negative consequence comes of
it, you will deeply regret it. I guarantee it.

2030 Jef

You were told what would happen if you continued to
post or lie about others personal, private information,
jonathan ball, and I will continue to post another letter or
number from your personal, private information every
time you try to intimidate others by posting theirs, or
what you believe to be theirs. If negative consequences
come from it, you only have your own wretched self
to blame. Do unto others, jonnie, you evil coward.

You cannot justify your criminal behavior on the
grounds that you "warned" me, Lesley. I am going to
make you regret posting any personal information about
me. That is a promise and guarantee, Lesley, not an
empty threat. I am already taking steps, beginning
with contacting your internet service provider, to
identify you and take the necessary legal and other
action against you.

You are not the net-cop, Lesley. If you attempt to act
like one, you will experience seriously adverse
consequences.

So posting personal details is criminal behaviour, is it?

Nice of you to admit what you've been doing.

Threaten away, ball, YOU are the one who will
be investigated.

Oh yeh, like we all forgot that only you and Dutch are allowed to
police the internet.

Stupid bugger.

Criminal behavior!!!?

Are you aware Goober that when you become aware of criminal activities
taking place it is your lawful duty to report such activities to the
proper authorities? You could be charged yourself for failing to do so.

Call Homeland Security and squeal your guts out Goober.

Well Goo has certainly posted my name and where I
live, as well as posting lies about me personally. If it's
illegal to do any or all of that, Goo is no doubt a criminal
in that respect with plenty of evidence to prove it.

Since he is a blatant liar, I've no doubt that he's also
a thief and a variety of other type low life scum as well.

YOU used to post your name, Fuckwit. As to posting where you live, I
have posted that you live on a shitty rusty filthy houseboat on Lake
Lanier. That's true, and not particularly specific.

You never answered the question, Fuckwit - why *did* you use Willie
Denson's phone number?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Eden
Feb 8, 6:24 am hide options

Newsgroups: alt.hacking
From: Eden <banm...@hotmail.com> - Find messages by this author
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 06:24:43 GMT
Local: Wed, Feb 8 2006 6:24 am
Subject: obtain usenet poster's identity

How do I go about obtaining the real name and other
identifying data of someone who is posting
not-quite-libelous and personally identifying
information about me in usenet, when the ISP won't
reveal the person's name? The usenet poster is in the
British Isles, and I'm in the U.S. (west coast). I'm
only interested in obtaining enough identifying
information about her that I can let her know that two
can play at that game, e.g, "so...how are things at 3nn
Popham's Road, Lesley?", or something to that effect.

How do I go about it?

Reply

2. Sync
Feb 8, 10:27 pm show options

Newsgroups: alt.hacking
From: Sync <alias.s...@gmail.com> - Find messages by this author
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:27:38 -0500
Local: Wed, Feb 8 2006 10:27 pm
Subject: Re: obtain usenet poster's identity

On 2/8/06 1:24 AM, in article
L8gGf.12366$rH5.1...@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net, "Eden"

<banm...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> when the ISP won't
> reveal the person's name?

What exactly have you asked the ISP to reveal?

Reply

3. soja_a
Feb 9, 4:50 am show options

Newsgroups: alt.hacking
From: soja_a <s...@retired.invalid> - Find messages by this author
Date: 9 Feb 2006 04:50:59 -0000
Local: Thurs, Feb 9 2006 4:50 am
Subject: Re: obtain usenet poster's identity

"Eden" wrote:
>How do I go about obtaining the real name and other identifying data of
>someone who is posting not-quite-libelous and personally identifying
>information about me in usenet, when the ISP won't reveal the person's >name?

When it can be done at all, it involves looking at header records and
researching past posts in Usenet archives (either Google's public one or a
private one of your own creation). That information, combined with some
net.detective work, is often enough to yield quite a bit of personal
information.

Let's take a working example:
Let's say someone posted to a newsgroup using a pseudonym like "Eden" and
an email address like b***...@hotmail.com. We'd search our archives for
previous posts by b***...@hotmail.com and find quite a few of them, by
several different pseudonyms. A bit of looking reveals that most of them
are associated with one person, but that that person is demonstrably _not_
the person who posted as "Eden." When the IP address of Eden, which
corresponds to an Earthlink customer in Los Angeles, is searched, it turns
up a particular nemesis of b***...@hotmail.com, currently posting under
the nym of "Leif Erikson." Tracing that email addy back in time takes us
back to 2002 and a person named Jonathan Ball, who coincidentally was an
LA Mindspring customer before Mindspring was bought by... Earthlink!! So,
now we've got a name and a general geographic location. A quick search of
directory listings turns up one in Asuza and another in Pasadena, either
or neither of which might be him.

I'd go on to more advanced techniques (SNMP vulnerabilities, MITM attacks,
social engineering, etc.) but I've begun to suspect that I'm talking to a
potential net.stalker. <g>

soja_a
<waves at alt.hacking>

Reply

4. Reverend Greed
Feb 9, 5:32 am show options

Newsgroups: alt.hacking
From: "Reverend Greed" <r...@sinning.org> - Find messages by this author
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 05:32:51 GMT
Local: Thurs, Feb 9 2006 5:32 am
Subject: Re: obtain usenet poster's identity

"soja_a" <s...@retired.invalid> wrote in message
news:9W0UMGJ43875...@reece.net.au...

"Eden" wrote:
>How do I go about obtaining the real name and other identifying data of
>someone who is posting not-quite-libelous and personally identifying
>information about me in usenet, when the ISP won't reveal the person's
>name?

> I'd go on to more advanced techniques (SNMP vulnerabilities, MITM attacks,
> social engineering, etc.) but I've begun to suspect that I'm talking to a
> potential net.stalker. <g>

> soja_a
> <waves at alt.hacking>

Good example. But even better observation.

-revgreed
--
"Sex is the foreplay. Ultra-violence is the climax."

Reply

http://tinyurl.com/cge9k

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

ROTFL..