YEP hes fit for Chicaago East Side , NOT PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES

HILLARY OR MC CAIN

Oh please…what another fraud….I have seen more people fitter than him in my local healthclub. This magazine also in the tank for Obama….the fraud just continues.

You dont need to be fit when your strategy is

Whatever Bush does or says, link it to McCain. Then yell “Yes We Can”

Dam, I feel fit after writing that!!!

Cinton supporters go here.

http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/

I think that`s a misprint, 25 fittest gays.

Even if this story was about one of the other candidates, I still would have found it incredibly stupid.

Osama smokes cigarettes. Some will say and do anything for ratings. MCain Demo-you better believe it!

Investigate
Larry Sinclair Obama Drug Scandal

He is fit alright, fit to run this country into the gutter, Now I guess mens fitness are bias liers, I will be cancelling my husbands subscription!

Did McCain make the list?

Obama is such a wimp. He has to manufacture controversy where there isn’t any.

He’s also an arrogant, elitist snob who feels that no one can question him.

He wouldn’t debate Hillary before NC and Indiana.

He wouldn’t go on Fox News.

HOWEVER — HE WILL MEET WITH FOREIGN “TERRORISTS” AND “ANTI-AMERICANS”!

THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE!

What has our country turned into, are we now voting for the best looking person to run our country?

You guys were happy when you talked about Romney. Now they say Obama and it’s whats wrong with America.

America-First, McCain is pandering to you and your silly enough to fall for it. He said that we need to talk to Hamas and now that he wants to show that he can be tough he is saying not to have talks with Hamas. Well, for some reason, our tough stand is not working. Tell that to the people who went to Iraq and got there heads cut off. I guess we don’t mind loosing a few Americans. Wait, we lost over 4000 Americans. Tough policy.

HE WILL MEET WITH FOREIGN “TERRORISTS” AND “ANTI-AMERICANS”!

What’s the issue with talking before taking action? What everyone should have a problem with is Our current president would go to a foriegn country and bash our potential future president. How does that make America look?

Obumma is a pansy.

Lisa-Fl, why would you think Obama is a pansy.

Everyone says this country is safer now than before 9/11. How? The borders aren’t secure, the taliban is getting stronger, Iran is closer to necular weapons. What has not talking produced. Bush won off fear last election and McCain is running on that same fear.

And funny, McCain forgot who our enemies were. He forgot that Al Qaeda was our enemy.

maybe it because I’m on the young side, but what attacks where happening on American soil before 9/11. For the country to be safer wouldn’t there have to be some previous attacks.

And it happened under a Republican. I guess we are safe when a Republican is in the White House.

Marc….Because he has refused to debate Hillary. Because he makes himself look ridiculous!!!! Because … He has to wait a day for his writers to come up with a reply for the Republicans & then proceeds to read it verbatim from a script. He is an empty suit & an embarressment to the Democratic Party. Any other questions? Are you one of those paid bloggers for Obama to try to bring unity? It is amazing to me how all of the Obama people suddenly think maybe Hillary wasn’t so bad. This was after all of your ridiculous hateful sexist comments.

Comment by Funny
May 16th, 2008 at 10:29 pm

maybe it because I’m on the young side, but what attacks where happening on American soil before 9/11. For the country to be safer wouldn’t there have to be some previous attacks.
———–

I guess you are correct. 9/11 was the second attempt on the Trade Towers.

hillary is a non factor right now just like every other canidate that lost. Do you see Edwards still campaigning. Fl, Mi. we knew the delegate were removed when she was ahead of everyone because of superdelagate support. Not one person believed that she wouldn’t be the nominee back then. it just didn’t happen for her, it’s over she need to except it.

FLORIDA DEMANDS REPRESENTATION (FDR)

PLEASE HELP US IN GETTING OUR VOTES COUNTED AND OUR DELEGATES SEATED BASED ON THE OUTCOME OF OUR VOTES.

SIGN OUR PETITION AND SEND IT IN:

Http://www.FloridaDemandsRepresentation.org

COME TO OUR WASHINGTON DC RALLY ON MAY 31st

PLEASE POST THIS INFORMATION ON AS MANY WEB SITES ARE YOU CAN.

P.S. SUPER DELEGATES: If our votes don’t count, why should YOURS?

Lisa-Fl, Hillary does the same thing. Hillary was a big supporter of the Black Panther. When that comes up, you guys say she felt sorry for them. You gotta be kidding me. Why should he debate her. I noticed that Hillary is backing Obama now. You guys are so anti-Obama and you want to vote for McCain. Even though economist said that McCain will put the country in a financial fiasco, you guys don’t care.

Comment by Funny
May 16th, 2008 at 10:20 pm

HE WILL MEET WITH FOREIGN “TERRORISTS” AND “ANTI-AMERICANS”!

What’s the issue with talking before taking action? What everyone should have a problem with is Our current president would go to a foriegn country and bash our potential future president. How does that make America look?
———————–

Like you said in an earlier post, you must be young.

We’ve been talking with the Islamist nut jobs for nearly 30 years.

Camp David, Olso Accords, perpetual negotiations between Israel and the group de jure.

UN sanctions, UN admonishments, IAEA reports, more sanctions, more scoldings.

The time for talk is long past. And the time for liberals ignoring inconvenient history is over as well.

How can anyone say this country is safer because of the war. The only reason we haven’t had more attack is because of that big body of water called the atlantic ocean. Bush says you can’t change a mind set by talking, how can you change it with violence?

Comment by Marc
May 16th, 2008 at 10:39 pm

Even though economist said that McCain will put the country in a financial fiasco, you guys don’t care.

———————————

Link please. I have yet to see an economist who will state that tax increases improve the economy, and very few who state that tax reductions hurt the economy.

I will gladly read any NON-PARTISAN economic report you supply.

and Andylit, I guess Bush made us safe. You gotta be kidding me. We have had our men get there heads cut off and we have lost over 4000 men. We defended the Saudi’s and they just told Bush NO!
Where are we safe.

Andylit, once again, it will be the rich who gets taxed. When Hillary say’s it, you are behind her. When Obama says it, he is going to bring this country down. You gotta be kidding me. You guys are drinking the Lieberman juice. He wants America to keep giving Isreal billions. Where will we get that money from. Thats McCain right hand man.

America could stay in Iraq for 100 years it would change the peoples mindset. The more stress from war the people endure the harder it will be to change their mindset.

Our troops are in Iraq fighting for there lives and Bush wants to be playing the 18th hole.

Comment by Funny
May 16th, 2008 at 10:40 pm

How can anyone say this country is safer because of the war. The only reason we haven’t had more attack is because of that big body of water called the atlantic ocean. Bush says you can’t change a mind set by talking, how can you change it with violence?
—————————-

Anyone who actually reads and pays attention to reports by the FBI and other security agencies knows exactly that.

There are literally hundreds of reports over the last 6 years about people who have been grabbed before they could blow stuff up or hijack planes or whatever.

Comment by Marc
May 16th, 2008 at 10:10 pm
Did McCain make the list?
***********************

Yes Marc (or marcman)…McCain was 1st in Most Patriotic. Couldn’t find Obama’s name on that list.

Are the attempts increasing or decreasing?

Comment by Marc
May 16th, 2008 at 10:44 pm

Andylit, once again, it will be the rich who gets taxed. When Hillary say’s it, you are behind her. When Obama says it, he is going to bring this country down. You gotta be kidding me. You guys are drinking the Lieberman juice. He wants America to keep giving Isreal billions. Where will we get that money from. Thats McCain right hand man.
———————–

Like I’ve said before, and you refuse to address, according to your hero, I am one of the wealthiest Americans.

You poor liberal slobs can’t even add. The Bush tax cuts went all the way down to people earning $31k.

And, as I said before and you refuse to answer, what exactly is the problem with supporting our only solid ally in the middle east?

Wow, do you people not understand the article. They say he is fit for a politician/future presidential candidate (I feel sorry for those who are clinging onto Hillary like a child would an expired but beloved pet, my heart goes out to you people). Furthermore the assertion that the magazine has a political bias towards Obama does not flow logically from this particular list it has put out. I have not taken a look at the list in its entirety, but i am almost certain that all the individuals on it have been chosen because they are the fittest within a certain clique, and then organized based on how fit they are with respect to the chosen others. It is not surprising that they chose a politician because, well Presidential elections!

By they way clever pun “Cathy in Indiana”, seriously when its so easy it doesn’t make you seem any smarter. I suppose someone had to do it…

Of course McCain made the list “Marc”, he is on there because he is the fittest guy to have actually drank from the water during the Boston Tea Party ( Tea + Boston Harbor water = Elixure of immortality)

who the Saudi’s?

Comment by Funny
May 16th, 2008 at 10:48 pm

Are the attempts increasing or decreasing?
———————-

From what I can read, they are slowly decreasing. At least the items that hit the news are decreasing.

Marc… How did the Black Panthers come into this???? I was talking about Obama making an a** out of himself . He is incompetent against the Republicans!!! He looks like a silly little boy reading his script.By the way I won’t vote for McCaine!! I’ll just sit this one out. So don’t waste Obama’s money replying to me.I know you are a paid blogger. Why else would an Obamabot be on Fox.The DNC had this in the bag this year until they started shoving this incompetent fool down our throats. Hillary would eat them alive!!!!!How are we supposed to rally around this wimp?

Lisa a wimp is someone who will sit this one out.

Comment by Sean
May 16th, 2008 at 10:50 pm

Wow, do you people not understand the article. They say he is fit for a politician/future presidential candidate (I feel sorry for those who are clinging onto Hillary like a child would an expired but beloved pet, my heart goes out to you people). Furthermore the assertion that the magazine has a political bias towards Obama does not flow logically from this particular list it has put out. I have not taken a look at the list in its entirety, but i am almost certain that all the individuals on it have been chosen because they are the fittest within a certain clique, and then organized based on how fit they are with respect to the chosen others. It is not surprising that they chose a politician because, well Presidential elections!

By they way clever pun “Cathy in Indiana”, seriously when its so easy it doesn’t make you seem any smarter. I suppose someone had to do it…

Of course McCain made the list “Marc”, he is on there because he is the fittest guy to have actually drank from the water during the Boston Tea Party ( Tea + Boston Harbor water = Elixure of immortality)
———————————

The idea that fitness magazine is expressing any thoughts on the race is ludicrous beyond belief.

Is he physically fit? That would be fair game for this article. Beyond that, you must be joking. Since when does the editor of a gymnasium rag qualify as a political analyst?

I would challenge anyone on this blog to give 1 solid reason we are safer due to Bush’s foreign policy. Moreover, give one solid reason we would be less secure with Obama’s views on foreign policy. I bet you cant..most people on this site are all talk…no substance

Brian: You sound very young and have obviously never lived through war times. Or, have you? Need to know that to know how to answer your question.

I ask anyone how Talking put America in more danger than not Talking.

Sweetie, that is what you call an empty answer……He doesn’t know, you do tell him and me.

Comment by Funny
May 16th, 2008 at 10:53 pm

Lisa a wimp is someone who will sit this one out.
————————–

Or someone who can’t bring herself to breach her principals by voting for either candidate.

Here’s the deal, Lisa.

If you sit out, you essentially cast a vote for whoever wins. Not voting is a political expression, but it often does not serve your core goals and beliefs in the long run.

You should sit down and catalog what is politically important to you, then compare that list against McCain and BO. List what they say they will do and also what you think they will do.

Come up with a candidate that is less repugnant to you, hold your nose, go into the booth and pull the lever.

Actually the 9/11 were more the fault of slick willy and his brilliant cut backs to our intelligence community to the point it was ineffective. We had numerous chances to take bin laden out but clinton would not pull the trigger. Bush couldn’t have prevented a thing. Same thing would have happened if kerry was in office. Dont kid yourself they did not plan those attacks in 6 months, it took years. And who dropped the ball? Clinton and company.

Lisa are you serious? You are going to sit this one out because your choice of nominee didnt win? You actually beleive more of the same is better than Obama. Please state your reasons? Please go beyond the fact you think he is a silly boy.

Sweetie, Brian is right. Why don’t you give us one good reason how we are safe under Bush.

Comment by Andylit
May 16th, 2008 at 10:54 pm

Comment by Sean
May 16th, 2008 at 10:50 pm

Wow, do you people not understand the article. They say he is fit for a politician/future presidential candidate (I feel sorry for those who are clinging onto Hillary like a child would an expired but beloved pet, my heart goes out to you people). Furthermore the assertion that the magazine has a political bias towards Obama does not flow logically from this particular list it has put out. I have not taken a look at the list in its entirety, but i am almost certain that all the individuals on it have been chosen because they are the fittest within a certain clique, and then organized based on how fit they are with respect to the chosen others. It is not surprising that they chose a politician because, well Presidential elections!

By they way clever pun “Cathy in Indiana”, seriously when its so easy it doesn’t make you seem any smarter. I suppose someone had to do it…

Of course McCain made the list “Marc”, he is on there because he is the fittest guy to have actually drank from the water during the Boston Tea Party ( Tea + Boston Harbor water = Elixure of immortality)
———————————

The idea that fitness magazine is expressing any thoughts on the race is ludicrous beyond belief.

Is he physically fit? That would be fair game for this article. Beyond that, you must be joking. Since when does the editor of a gymnasium rag qualify as a political analyst?

___________________

I don’t think you fully understudy what i said in its entirety because for some reason you seem to be arguing the race card when i didn’t mention race at all. In addition to that the magazine is not trying to play the role of a political analyst…another argument that seems to have been the brainchild of someone to once again has comprehension issues. The magazine is not analyzing the politics, I stated that they are analyzing the physique of the politician.

**Shakes head

SWEETIE you dont need to know my age to answer my question. Feel free to use any time in history you need to establish your point.

Hey Funny!!! A war monger or an incompetent fool. Which is the lesser of two evils? Who is more dangerous?

Nice Sean.

Thank you Marc

What make him incompetent? the fact that he is willing to talk. When did talking become a bad thing.

Talking does not make one incompetent, it is talking about things you don’t understand as if you understand them which makes one incompetent.

Thats all the Republicans have.

Lol

** Shakes head (up down in agreement this time)

Comment by Funny
May 16th, 2008 at 11:06 pm
What make him incompetent? the fact that he is willing to talk. When did talking become a bad thing.
******************************************
When you try talk and diplomacy for Years and they Still fly 2 planes into the Twin Towers. You CANNOT “talk” to nor with terrorists.

Comment by Brian
May 16th, 2008 at 10:55 pm

I would challenge anyone on this blog to give 1 solid reason we are safer due to Bush’s foreign policy. Moreover, give one solid reason we would be less secure with Obama’s views on foreign policy. I bet you cant..most people on this site are all talk…no substance
—————

Brian, I am trying to get a post through but the censor is whacking it.

Comment by Sean
May 16th, 2008 at 11:02 pm

Comment by Andylit
May 16th, 2008 at 10:54 pm

Comment by Sean
May 16th, 2008 at 10:50 pm

Wow, do you people not understand the article. They say he is fit for a politician/future presidential candidate (I feel sorry for those who are clinging onto Hillary like a child would an expired but beloved pet, my heart goes out to you people). Furthermore the assertion that the magazine has a political bias towards Obama does not flow logically from this particular list it has put out. I have not taken a look at the list in its entirety, but i am almost certain that all the individuals on it have been chosen because they are the fittest within a certain clique, and then organized based on how fit they are with respect to the chosen others. It is not surprising that they chose a politician because, well Presidential elections!

By they way clever pun “Cathy in Indiana”, seriously when its so easy it doesn’t make you seem any smarter. I suppose someone had to do it…

Of course McCain made the list “Marc”, he is on there because he is the fittest guy to have actually drank from the water during the Boston Tea Party ( Tea + Boston Harbor water = Elixure of immortality)
———————————

The idea that fitness magazine is expressing any thoughts on the race is ludicrous beyond belief.

Is he physically fit? That would be fair game for this article. Beyond that, you must be joking. Since when does the editor of a gymnasium rag qualify as a political analyst?

___________________

I don’t think you fully understudy what i said in its entirety because for some reason you seem to be arguing the race card when i didn’t mention race at all. In addition to that the magazine is not trying to play the role of a political analyst…another argument that seems to have been the brainchild of someone to once again has comprehension issues. The magazine is not analyzing the politics, I stated that they are analyzing the physique of the politician.

**Shakes head
——————————————-

How in the world did you pull race out of my comment? Obsessed? Seeing it everywhere?

Do the young college students not understand that there is ALWAYS talk and diplomacy BEFORE war. There are BAD people in this world….face it. Not All things can be talked out. I would LOVE to hear one, just one, idea a college student has for getting out of Iraq. I’m openminded enough to consider any ideas you might have. Obama doesn’t have any.

Oops my bad, missed the “the” before race, but i still stick with the latter part of my response.

Funny..talking is not a bad thing. It is the fact that he is not experienced enough to talk unrehearsed. Let him go on Fox…let him debate Hillary…. let him answer the hard questions without a script & a rehearsed speach. Maybe when he has a little more experience…but you & I both know he has some issues with foreign policies…the man doesn’t even know how many states we have(57 comment…I know you have heard it. )Also we don’t know this man…If this man would sit in a church for 20 years that preaches hate & deny he never heard any hate & then turn around and throw Wright under the bus…What is going on here??? Are you really comfortable with this candidate? What else is gonna come out of his closet. I guess the most important thing is a Democratic Whitehouse. How in the world can we ever acheive it with this pick for the nomination?

Brian’s comment was … Moreover, give one solid reason we would be less secure with Obama’s views on foreign policy.

Answer: 9/11 World Trade Center. Happened after Years of trying diplomacy and “talk”. 9/11 is a pretty sound reason to most Americans. We have Not forgotten.

Brian,

I have tried and tried to no avail. I cannot figure out what word or phrase is tripping the censor.

If you really want to learn something about the answers you asked for, go to this article and read ALL of it.

http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/014/947kigpp.asp

Rwethereyet,
Obama has not suggested we talk to tterrorist. He his stated with have discussions with places like Syria and Iran. These are sovereign countries. Just because we dont like them or have seriously conflicting views doesnt make them terrorist.
Moreover, terrorism is defined as “… violence against civilians to achieve political or ideological objectives by creating fear” Depeneding on what side of the fence you are standing on some would say that may countries that we think of as “good countries” are terrorist.

Why does Obama say he will Unite “everyone”? What’s wrong with letting people have their Own ideas and opinions. Why does everyone have to think alike?? Nothing wrong with having 2 sides to an issue. America is Fine the way she is….just needs improvement in Washington on BOTH sides.

Rwethereyet, do you really feel the solution that is currently being employed is “secure”?

Irrelevant. Bush is “fit” too, and look what a BANG UP job he did. All that matters is the next Prez have a brain and NOT EMBARRASS US as the current idiot does.

Comment by Lisa-Fl.
May 16th, 2008 at 11:18 pm
Funny..talking is not a bad thing. It is the fact that he is not experienced enough to talk unrehearsed. Let him go on Fox…let him debate Hillary…. let him answer the hard questions without a script & a rehearsed speach. Maybe when he has a little more experience…but you & I both know he has some issues with foreign policies…the man doesn’t even know how many states we have(57 comment…I know you have heard it. )Also we don’t know this man…If this man would sit in a church for 20 years that preaches hate & deny he never heard any hate & then turn around and throw Wright under the bus…What is going on here??? Are you really comfortable with this candidate? What else is gonna come out of his closet. I guess the most important thing is a Democratic Whitehouse. How in the world can we ever acheive it with this pick for the nomination?
_______________________________________________________________________________

As an American, the most important thing is who is the right person for the job at the particular times we are in. It should always transcend party. Historically, the American public have preferred that one party does not control both the Congress and the White House.

Comment by Brian
May 16th, 2008 at 11:23 pm

Rwethereyet,
Obama has not suggested we talk to tterrorist. He his stated with have discussions with places like Syria and Iran. These are sovereign countries. Just because we dont like them or have seriously conflicting views doesnt make them terrorist.
Moreover, terrorism is defined as “… violence against civilians to achieve political or ideological objectives by creating fear” Depeneding on what side of the fence you are standing on some would say that may countries that we think of as “good countries” are terrorist.
————————————-

Obviously you want nothing more than MoveOn talking points.

What part of the word “sponsor” do you not understand? Iran and Syria are feeding weapons and manpower into Iraq. They are supplying Hezbollah, Hamas and a numerous other groups.

Your second paragraph is pathetic. Just pathetic.

Brian’s comment: Moreover, terrorism is defined as “… violence against civilians to achieve political or ideological objectives by creating fear” Depeneding on what side of the fence you are standing on some would say that may countries that we think of as “good countries” are terrorist.

Iran is sending militants across the border to K*i*l*l Americans and Civilians are paying for that. That certainly sounds like your description above. Did you see the movie “Stepford Wives”….. Obama supporters sound like Stepford clones with absolutely No life experiences.

Unbelievable………..

Comment by Sean
May 16th, 2008 at 11:23 pm

Rwethereyet, do you really feel the solution that is currently being employed is “secure”?
————–

Sean,

What is your explanation for the fact that we have not had a successful attack on our soil since 9/11?

Do you think they just went away? That they haven’t been trying?

Comment by Sean
May 16th, 2008 at 11:23 pm
Rwethereyet, do you really feel the solution that is currently being employed is “secure”?
———————–
What do you mean by Solution?? I haven’t heard of a “solution”

Comment by Andylit
May 16th, 2008 at 11:28 pm

Comment by Brian
May 16th, 2008 at 11:23 pm

Rwethereyet,
Obama has not suggested we talk to tterrorist. He his stated with have discussions with places like Syria and Iran. These are sovereign countries. Just because we dont like them or have seriously conflicting views doesnt make them terrorist.
Moreover, terrorism is defined as “… violence against civilians to achieve political or ideological objectives by creating fear” Depeneding on what side of the fence you are standing on some would say that may countries that we think of as “good countries” are terrorist.
————————————-

Obviously you want nothing more than MoveOn talking points.

What part of the word “sponsor” do you not understand? Iran and Syria are feeding weapons and manpower into Iraq. They are supplying Hezbollah, Hamas and a numerous other groups.

Your second paragraph is pathetic. Just pathetic.

___________

Brian I agree, and seriously someone change the censor to filter out Andylit, he seems to be having a hard time understanding the depth of the arguments posted here

Brian, Sean and Marc have zero depth or knowledge.

They are asking the bullet point questions they are coached to ask by the loony left with no actual understanding of what they are asking.

Further, when challenged, they have no response beyond getting shrill or changing the subject.

ICBM,
Good sentiment but so far it is only leading to political deadlocks.

Comment by Brian
May 16th, 2008 at 11:34 pm
ICBM,
Good sentiment but so far it is only leading to political deadlocks
__________________________________________________________

You can thank Congress for that

Andylit,
I am having trouble finding in the blogs one thing that makes you different from the way you categorize us. Simply take your last blog and substitute it with “your name” and “loony right”

Comment by Andylit
May 16th, 2008 at 11:33 pm
Brian, Sean and Marc have zero depth or knowledge.

They are asking the bullet point questions they are coached to ask by the loony left with no actual understanding of what they are asking.

Further, when challenged, they have no response beyond getting shrill or changing the subject.
_____________________________________________________________________—

Seans assertion is probably one man’s terrorists is another’s freedom-fighter

ICBM, why should Bush not share the blame?

If i recall correctly Andyilt , I did challenge you, and furthermore i don’t recalling any bullet point questions.

Do you not see the hypocrisy in accusing someone of being shrill when you, yourself symply just denounced Brian’s second paragraph as pathetic?

What’s so hard about running your mouth re Obhamas? NOT impressed in the least.

Comment by Brian
May 16th, 2008 at 11:37 pm

Andylit,
I am having trouble finding in the blogs one thing that makes you different from the way you categorize us. Simply take your last blog and substitute it with “your name” and “loony right”
——————–

Very simple. I can point you to factual accounts to support my statements. You simply parrot talking points from the fringe.

Comment by Brian
May 16th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
ICBM, why should Bush not share the blame?
___________________________________________

Do you then admit Congress has blame?