• On TechRepublic: Five reasons why Windows Vista failed
August 20, 2008 3:44 AM PDT

Free-to-play, ad-supported games the winners?

Posted by Dave Rosenberg
  • Print

Nvidia Vice President and PC Gaming Alliance Chief Technology Officer Roy Taylor thinks that video game companies are missing out on future revenue growth.

"The West needs to recognize that the free-to-play model is the future, before it's too late," Taylor said, citing the massive growth of gaming across Asia.

I wrote recently about a report stating that the PC gaming market generated $10.7 billion worldwide during 2007. Half of that came from Asia, where, according to Taylor, "the free-to-play microtransaction and ad-supported model has found huge success." But it seems that outside of Asia, that model isn't nearly as popular.

What we must do as an industry is really start thinking about how we make money from games. When we figure this out, what we're going to see is a resurgence in PC gaming. These new business models, such as free-to-play, can take better advantage of the huge scalability provided by a massive worldwide PC installed base. Think about what that means: those 20 million Xbox users are a fraction of the audience that you can reach on (a) PC.

This is an interesting idea, but it's unclear how you can insert actionable advertising into video games. You do see ads in games, but they tend to not be too dynamic, and they are rarely actionable--you are unlikely to click on a Coke ad in your FIFA soccer game, as you are there to play a game, not click on ads.

On the other hand, a huge number of proof points exist to show that ad-supported, free-to-use products can garner huge traffic and generate significant revenue. I agree with Taylor that there are some very large opportunities on the horizon.

Dave Rosenberg is currently working on a new stealth start-up based in San Francisco. He is Co-founder of MuleSource, an open source integration and infrastructure software company and is a recognized thought-leader in open source software and service-oriented architecture. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Negative Approach
Death and taxes in virtual worlds
Off-topic: Peter Gunn video
Solving data integrity issues with Master Data Management
Open Sources Episode 3: Why does technology hate us?
Business intelligence and the consumerization of information
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 8 comments
by hunter_jc August 20, 2008 4:29 AM PDT
Yeah free-to-play model like the GameTap rocks.
Reply to this comment
by Nith84 August 20, 2008 5:32 AM PDT
There is a huge market developping for free to play Browser Based Strategy games (e.g. Travian). Those are simple strategy games that can be played from any computer straight through your browser. There is add banners in the corners and in addition you can buy premium services (for about $5 a month) to remove the adds. I belive the market is catching up in North America but this is huge in europe and asia.
Reply to this comment
by Sicarius_Rex August 20, 2008 5:43 AM PDT
A downloadable MMORPG called Anarchy Online does the free-to-play model extremely well. In game, there are certain "billboards" that are used to display ads to the free player, but are converted to in-game advertisements that enhance the immersion into the world they have created. Free players are welcomed, and are the basis for the majority of gameplay, while paid accounts enjoy some exclusive material, in addition to the removal of ads.
Reply to this comment
by gmbidols August 20, 2008 6:08 AM PDT
Hii
I Like It Very Useful Content
http://www.gmb.in/about.htm
http://www.gmb.in/contactus.htm
Reply to this comment
by UITD August 20, 2008 8:40 AM PDT
Exactly how? I dont who is clicking on these ads. I have ad blockers galore installed. I dont know anyone who does. Dont be surprised when, companies who's bread and butter revenue stream is from ads, collapse. That includes Google. They better have a plan-b revenue stream and hurry.
Reply to this comment
by blsith August 20, 2008 9:29 AM PDT
@UITD - I doubt Google's ad model is going to break, because folks want mindshare. People want stuff for free, sure. But the hip boots are there one way or another. "Free" TV = commercials. Commercial-free TV = pay. Someone has to pay for the person doing the development.

That said, there are plenty of various games out there now that are ad-supported. Dungeon Runners and the Pirates of the Caribbean game come to mind right away. But, oh yeah, the 5+ million people playing WoW in Asia paying $15/month or whatever surely are hurting the PC market...

Free to play has a place, and high quality games have a place. They are all part of the mixture of gaming that will continue to emerge over time, as new revenue streams from the interwebs evolve.
Reply to this comment
by daverosenberg August 20, 2008 10:06 AM PDT
There is definitely a trade-off in the free to play with ads (that are annoying) vs paying for games. Odds are there ways to combine the two and make more money and increase adoption.
Reply to this comment
by fatfoogoo September 8, 2008 2:32 AM PDT
fatfoogoo has been building customized g-commerce solutions for a number of free-to-play titles over the years. We've seen clients that want only micro-transactions, only in-game advertising, only subscription management, and a number of them want a mix of 2 or all 3. Either way you look at it, the traditional state of online gaming is rapidly breaking down and monetization models are cropping up all over the place. Which one is the most successful? It all depends on the title, the consumers, and where the sweet spot is.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

E-tailers eye Cyber Monday

After a better-than-expected Black Friday, retailers' hopes are up for a sale-heavy day online. Predictions, however, are mixed.


The other digital-TV transition

As digital TV migration nears, confusion mounts as some cable customers see basic cable channels disappear from their analog packages.


Photos: Space station marks a decade aloft

The first pieces of the International Space Station went into orbit 10 years ago. Now a full-fledged lab facility, it continues to grow.


Resource center from CNET News sponsors
Business. Ready.
Sony VAIO® Professional PCs.

Click Here!
A new grade in mobility demands a new kind of notebook. And Sony delivers.Tough, portable and featuring up to 7.5 hours of battery life! VAIO® Professional notebooks are built for business. Learn more.

Click Here!
Built tough for business.

Learn more about the rigorous quality testing Sony puts its notebooks through.

Protect your investment.

Find out why VAIO® tech support recently won a Laptop Editors' Choice Award, July 2008.

Long battery life.

Up to 7.5 hours of battery life! See how VAIO® PCs will keep you productive longer when on the road.

Travel light

Check out our ultraportable line-up, starting at 2.87 lbs.

PCs for every need.

Find out which VAIO® notebook is right for you.

About Negative Approach

Dave Rosenberg is currently working on a new stealth start-up based in San Francisco. On the Negative Approach Blog, Dave discusses the dynamics of growing a startup company and how the software market is evolving against monolithic software corporations whose corporate hegemony stifle innovation and annoy developers worldwide. He has experience at both large corporations and several startups; technology has long been his best friend and mortal enemy. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Negative Approach topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right