Showing posts with label Carlton Stowers' Posts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Carlton Stowers' Posts. Show all posts

WHEN THE DEVIL WENT DOWN TO KANSAS

Admit it, each of us with an interest in history’s landmark crimes has that one horrific tale that fascinates above all others. For some it might be the case of Jack the Ripper, for others the murder of the Black Dahlia or maybe the assassination of President Kennedy. Notice the connection? Each remains unresolved, fodder for ageless speculation and theory. It’s what lends to their shelf life.

For me, it is the long ago deeds of a family that would come to be known as the Bloody Benders…

Before Truman Capote ventured from his Manhattan playground to a small town called Holcomb, Kansas, there to research a book that would lend wings to the true crime genre, the state had already laid claim to one of the most notorious murder sprees in American crime annals. You know of Perry Smith and Dick Hickock and the homicidal evil they brought to the quiet Clutter family home in the late ‘50s. Their deeds, however dark and horrendous, pale in comparison to a series of murders that occurred on the pioneer prairie lands in the days immediately following the Civil War.

Ten travelers along the Osage Trail visited a makeshift way stop in southeast Kansas, never to again be seen. One by one, they were killed and robbed by a strange family who had earlier settled on the treeless, sweeping plains.

Little wonder that locals would ultimately refer to the scene of the crimes as The Devil’s Inn.

The terms “serial killer” and “mass murderers” were not a part of the American vernacular back then. Missing persons were rarely reported to the authorities. In the middle of nowhere, crimes could be carried out with casual ease and often go undetected forever. On the frontier, there was very little law and only the slightest hint of order.

And the Bloody Benders, as folklorists would eventually call them, took full advantage.

The story begins with a struggling nation’s new search for a more prosperous lifestyle. By governmental decree, the Osage Indian tribe had been driven from their Kansas homeland south to the newly established Indian Territory (Oklahoma), freeing parcels of land for adventuresome pioneers who wished to travel west and claim 160-acre plots on which to build a better life.

Among them were German immigrant John (Pa) Bender, Sr., a large, bushy-browed man in his late 50s, and his lanky 20-year-old son John, Jr., who punctuated virtually every sentence he spoke with a child-like giggle. They traveled to the Kansas flatlands and filed claim to acreage in an isolated portion of Labette County between the townships of Thayer and Cherryvale. Just off the well-traveled Osage Trail that connected Lawrence to Fort Scott, the locale was two miles removed from the only water supply, Big Hill Creek, and the landscape of the Benders’ new property was hardly that of a garden spot. Still, they set about building a 16x24 one-room cabin atop a rock-bottomed cellar, erected a small barn and stable, dug a water well, and planted an orchard and garden.

Then, in the fall of 1871, the elder Bender summoned his wife and stepdaughter from Michigan, where they had resided in a small lumber mill camp while their new home out west was being prepared. Kate Bender and her 25-year-old daughter (also named Kate) by a previous marriage traveled to Ottawa, Kan., by train. Before making the 100-mile wagon trip southward to their new home they purchased supplies and furniture for their new home.

The harsh region’s population had suddenly grown by four, though few neighbors would ever get to know the strange and standoffish Bender family.

Except, that is, for daughter Kate, pretty, personable and a self-proclaimed “spiritualist” who occasionally entertained visitors to neighboring community saloons with her talents as a psychic medium who claimed the ability to contact the dead and cure a variety of ailments – all for a price. Billing herself as Professor Miss Katie Bender, the young auburn-haired, hazel-eyed woman’s local popularity and notoriety quickly grew.

Ma Bender, a lumbering, overweight woman in her mid-60s, spoke little English but also had ideas about how to improve the family’s ever dire financial situation.

The constant parade of cross-country travelers along the Osage Trail, most of them weary settlers in search of land of their own to claim, offered a business opportunity that she quickly embraced. Soon a crudely lettered sign advertising “Groceries” appeared above the door to the Bender cabin. A wagon cover canvas was stretched across the one-room homestead, the front half furnished by a small dining table, a wood-burning stove and shelves upon which groceries-for-sale were displayed. Behind the canvas was the Benders’ cramped living area.

Soon, a steady stream of visitors were stopping at the “inn,” some for a meal and feed and water for their horses, some to purchase provisions, others to bed down in the nearby barn for a much-needed night’s rest.

Some went on their way, satisfied customers. Others, who were thought to be carrying worthwhile amounts of cash and valuables, were murdered.

For a period of 18 months, from 1871 to 1873, the diabolical plan was carried out without notice or concern of others living in the region.

The traveling strangers, either having a meal prepared by Ma Bender or being entertained by one of Miss Kate’s seances, were always seated with their back to the canvas that divided the cabin. The elder Bender and his dim-witted son stood in wait behind the canvas, one wielding a hammer, the other a knife. Following a pre-arranged signal from Kate, Pa Bender would strike the unknowing visitor in the back of the head, rendering him unconscious if not dead. The men would then drag the body into the back of the cabin where the trap door leading to the cellar had been opened. In the cellar, the victim’s throat would be cut. Robbed of cash and valuables, the body, stripped of clothing and often dismembered, would remain in the dark underground hideaway until a grave could be dug in the Bender’s nearby orchard.

It was a grim routine played out, some estimate, as many as 21 times though remains of only 10 bodies were ever located.

And had it not been for the concern of the brother of one of the Bender’s victims, the killing spree would have doubtless continued.

In the spring of 1873, an Independence, Kan., physican, Dr. William York, had stopped in at the Bender’s inn while making a westward journey to visit relatives in Fort Scott. Fascinated by Miss Kate’s claims to have spiritual healing powers, he had promised to stop in again on his way home.

The doctor never returned to Independence.

Army Colonel Ed York had been aware that his brother planned to visit the makeshift inn and, in late May set out to re-trace the route he knew the doctor had taken. Stopping at the Benders’ inn, he told them of Dr. York’s disappearance and asked if he had, in fact, stopped there during his trip. The Benders expressed their sympathies for the Colonel’s concern, readily admitting they had briefly hosted his brother, serving him a meal while his horses were tended, and had looked forward to seeing him again on his return. They suggested the possibility that he might have encountered trouble with renegade Indians who had refused to move south to the Indian Territory. Miss Kate even offered to conduct a séance in an effort to reach the missing brother. Ma Bender served him a meal while her husband and son fed and watered his horses.

It is here that the history becomes clouded: In one version, Col. York is said to have agreed with the Benders’ suggestion that Indians might have abducted and killed his brother. In another, he was briefly left alone in the front room of the inn and, peeking beyond the canvas into the family living area, noticed a shiny object beneath the bed. It was a locket like that carried by his brother. Opening it, the colonel saw that it contained photographs of his brother’s wife and young daughter. Col. York, the story goes, immediately slipped from the inn to his buggy and rode away, convinced that his brother had been killed by the Benders.

Other families, sharing Col. York’s concern, began taking note of the fact that it was in the same region that their loved ones had vanished. Soon, inquiries reached such regularity that a town meeting was called at the nearby Harmony Grove school to discuss what most local residents viewed as nothing more than slanderous insinuations.

Among the 75 or so who attended were John Bender and his son.

To set the outrageous claims to rest, the local constable suggested that he and a team of deputies would soon visit and search every farmhouse in the county.

Due to heavy rains, it would be days before the search got underway, almost two weeks before the constable and his men reached the Bender property. There, on a late afternoon, they found the cabin abandoned, starving livestock roaming unattended. A tethered calf had died and several pigs wandered their quagmire pen in vain search of food.

The only thing left behind was a gagging stench that permeated the small cabin.
Locating a trap door in the floor, constable and township trustee Leroy Dick pulled at its leather handle and ventured down the ladder into the earthen, foul-smelling cellar. Lighting a lantern, he saw dried blood in every direction he looked. The crime scene had been discovered.

It would be Col. York, having accompanied the search party, who would make an even more gruesome discovery. Seated in his buggy, he noticed an unusual depression in the ground at the edge of the Benders nearby orchard. What he had sighted was the shallow grave in which his brother had been buried.

The following day, armed with spades and shovels, authorities discovered nine other graves. The skulls of those buried had been so badly damaged that for some facial identification was all but impossible. Their throats had also been cut. In one grave, a man named George Loncher and his young daughter had been buried together. The child’s body showed no evidence of violence, leading the investigators to assume she had either been strangled to death or buried alive. Another body was later found at the bottom of the Benders’ water well. Skeletal remains of two others were eventually located in an isolated area a few miles removed from the Bender cabin.

Adding to the gruesome nature of the discovery were body parts of other unknown victims.

Outrage over the atrocities spread quickly. In Independence, another of Dr. York’s brothers, state Senator Alexander York offered a $1,000 reward for information leading to the apprehension of the Bender family. Kansas Governor Thomas Osborn established an additional $2,000 reward.

Journalists from as far away as Chicago and New York arrived to report the ghastly story, one account estimating that as many as 3,000 people had traveled to visit the scene of the mass murders within weeks of the discovery. The media quickly gave the Bender property a new name: Hell’s Acre.

And what of the suddenly vanished Benders?

Immediately after discovery of the bodies, posses were dispatched throughout the state in search of the murderous family. More than one group claimed to have found and killed them. One story had the Benders killed in a gunfight, then buried in unmarked graves on the Kansas prairie. Still another posse leader said that he and his men had happened on the fleeing Benders’ campsite late one night, killed them, then burned their bodies.

A member of a four-man vigilante posse, hired and led by Col. York, told of slipping quietly out to the Bender cabin just days after the colonel’s initial visit, forcing a confession from the family at gunpoint, then lynching all four before tossing their bodies into the Verdigris River. That done, he told of taking the Benders’ abandoned wagon to nearby Thayer where they tethered it on the township’s outskirts. Indeed, a state detective assigned to the case later reported locating the Benders’ wagon and tied-up team of lame and starving horses. In the wagon was the hand-painted wooden sign advertising “Groceries” that had once hung above the Benders’ front door.

Those who argue that this scenario is the most likely suggest that a reward, later offered by Col. York’s brother, was done so only to divert attention from the colonel’s involvement in the revenge killings. A huge sum of money at the time, the $1,000 would, the colonel knew, never be paid.

However, the detective who traveled to Thayer to investigate found evidence the Benders had, in fact, arrived there alive and well and boarded a north-bound train. A ticket agent verified descriptions of the two men and women who had purchased fares to Humboldt. Investigators would later determine that the two younger Benders had switched to a train bound southward to either Texas or New Mexico. Meanwhile, the elder Benders reportedly continued on to St. Louis.

There they appeared unannounced at the home of John Bender’s sister who had not seen her brother in two decades. During a brief stay, they told the sister little of where they had been or where they might be headed and then, one day while their host was away from the house, they and the lone trunk they had brought with them simply vanished.

Then, there is an account by deputy sheriff John Snook, that the Bender men made their way to the small mining community of Salmon, Idaho, where they briefly resided until a local Indian reported the discovery of a body floating in a nearby river. Investigating, the deputy determined that the body was that of the younger of the two unknown men with German accents who had recently arrived in the community. The victim, it appeared, had died of an ax blow to the top of his head.

And the elder companion he’d been seen with had retrieved his horse from a local feed lot corral and disappeared. The deputy had a suspect and learned that the mare which the man was riding had been recently shod, making tracking far easier. Snook and two volunteers were soon on a trail that led toward the Montana Territory.

After two days and 90 miles, they caught up with and captured their murder suspect near the community of Dillon at a place known as Point of the Rocks. It was on the return to Idaho that it occurred to deputy Snook that his prisoner matched the description of the infamous John Bender, Sr.

On the late evening of July 4, 1884, Snook returned to Salmon with his prisoner, shackled him and placed him in the back room of a local store since the tiny community had no jail. Snook then contacted the Kansas authorities to alert them to the fact he believed he had John Bender, Sr., in custody, charged with the murder of his own son.

While preparations were being made for a trial, the man who Snook had become convinced was Bender, was kept in the darkened, dirt-floored room, chained by the ankle to a large pillar. Then, one night as a local Chinese cook arrived to deliver dinner he made a horrifying discovery.

The prisoner had found a buried knife, left behind by some forgotten law-breaker, and had freed himself by cutting his foot away so that he might slip from the heavy metal cuff. All that remained of the murder suspect was his bloody, severed foot.

And once again, John Bender vanished.

An even more outrageous claim came four years after the Benders’ disappearance. During a visit to relatives in Topeka, Captain Don Pieppo walked into the office of the Topeka Commonwealth and announced that he knew what had happened to the vanished Benders.

He told a reporter that he had been the commander of a small ship sailing from Mexico to Galveston, Tex., in April of 1873 when a sudden storm blew across the Gulf of Mexico. In the midst of the gale his ship was suddenly jolted when something became tangled in its mast. Seconds later a gondola from a large balloon fell to the deck. In it were two men and two women, three of whom had been killed by the fall. The only survivor was the younger of the men.

Quickly taken below deck, the man identified himself as John Bender, Jr., and told how his family had fled Kansas in the hot air balloon. His sister, he went on to explain, had discovered a boiling spring of gas near their prairie home and his ingenious father had built the balloon. They had planned to travel to Mexico but had lost control of the balloon somewhere over the Indian Territory and drifted across Texas and out to sea.

Two hours after telling his story, the youngest Bender died.

Soon thereafter, Pieppo said, his ship sank, taking with it the bodies of the Bender family.

Meanwhile, the owner of a Denison, Tex., boarding house, traveled to Labette County, Kansas, to tell constable Leroy Dick that the young Benders had been recent residents there, the man working as a member of a construction crew. The informant explained that the man and woman, who he’d initially thought to be man and wife, had repeatedly expressed interest in the location of outlaw colonies that were reported to be thriving in the southwest parts of the state.

Though having become leery of “Bender sightings,” Dick contacted Texas authorities to ask that the boardinghouse owner’s story be investigated.

Soon Dick was told that investigators were on a trail leading south toward El Paso. They also reported that an elderly man and woman had joined the young couple on the trip that appeared to be leading either toward the Mexico border or an outlaw hideaway in the Big Bend region.

Only when the trail did, in fact, lead toward the outlaw colony – a region where great danger awaited any law officer – did the Texas officials contact Dick to advise him they were giving up on their pursuit.

How long the Benders remained among the other outlaws is the subject of considerable debate. As is what occurred when, believing interest in the Kansas murders had subsided, they opted to leave. Stories are told that the elder Benders, short of money and weary of the isolation, left after only a short stay. And soon, Pa Bender, following a dispute with his wife, deserted her to go his own way. Reports have him finally returning to Michigan in poor health where, in 1988, he drowned in a creek near a lumber camp. Meanwhile, it has been suggested that young John Bender chose stay in the Southwest, living out his remaining days near El Paso. Miss Kate is said to have become romantically involved with a member of one of the outlaw gangs hiding at the colony and remained for some time after others in her family had left.

Finally, however, Miss Kate also packed her bags and left, saying that she was “headed to Michigan to see if she could find her mother.”

Whether dead or alive, hither or yon, the Benders had become little more than mythical ghosts. Yet whatever the truth, their ghastly deeds and disappearance remained constant grist for pulp detective magazines. So ingrained was the Bender legend in the consciousness of much of the American public that the family even became the subject of occasional mean-spirited joking. On city streets or in rural areas of the mid- and southwest, wherever a disheveled and ominous-looking drifter appeared, someone was certain to laugh, point and say, “Hey, look, there goes Old Man Bender.”

And, despite cold trails and hard-to-believe claims of sightings from a half dozen states, the search sporadically continued for well over a decade. Routinely, publicity-seekers and mental cases would come forward to “confess” to the Kansas crimes. On several occasions women would be identified as Ma and Kate Bender, investigated, then quickly dismissed.

In 1889 – 16 years after the discovery of the bodies on the old Bender place -- two women were actually extradited from Michigan to Kansas after being named as suspects in the murder of Dr. York. In Labette County, 13 residents who had lived in the region from 1871 to ‘73 and knew the Benders on sight, were summoned to the courthouse to see if they could identify the two women. Seven made positive ID’s; six would only say the women closely resembled Ma and Kate Bender. Still, the prosecution believed it had a strong case, one that would finally bring some resolve to the Kansas killing spree – until defense attorney John T. James produced surprising documentation showing that the elder of the two women had, in fact, been married to a man other than John Bender in the early ‘70s and had been in a Michigan prison, serving the first years of a 16-year term for another murder, at the time of the Kansas killing spree.

As the local prosecutor’s case collapsed, he realized that a conviction was all but impossible and petitioned the judge to dismiss the case. The two women, who had sworn their names were Almira and Sarah Eliza Davis, were set free.

Distraught at the turn of events, constable Leroy Dick would go to his grave believing they were actually the Bender mother and daughter. The last time he would see them, they were walking away from the courthouse, both smiling, Miss Kate pulling her young son behind her in a red wagon. Several members of the community had raised a fund to help the women make their trip back to Michigan.

By the time she met Flickenger, Almira was already the mother of 12 children, three who had died in infancy, a son who was an epileptic, a daughter she had been unsuccessfully tried for murdering and a son she had allegedly poisoned so that he might not testify that he had helped her dispose of his sister’s body. She had finally gone to prison after being found guilty of striking her pregnant daughter-in-law in the stomach with a club in a fit of anger. The act resulted in the death of the unborn child. She was also the primary suspect in the murder of a young black girl who had been a playmate of her children. Then, a local farmer who she claimed to be married to was also a murder victim, his body discovered at the bottom of the family well. Almira had mourned briefly, sold the farm, and then did her disappearing act.

Soon she teamed up with Flickenger. It was he who would eventually suggest that they consider a new start, a new locale where their reputation did not precede them. Perhaps, he said, they should think of settling somewhere out west.

Constable Dick learned all this when he had been greeted by the Berrien Springs (Mich.) sheriff who had arrested two women calling themselves Davis on charges of theft and larceny. The sheriff explained that he had known the older woman when her name was Griffith; in all likelihood the name Davis was an alias. He’d known her to use several others over the years. One of them, he suggested, was most likely “Bender.”

The following morning the sheriff took Dick to the jail and positioned him where he might watch the two women without their seeing him. He immediately recognized the younger woman who was holding a young child. Time had not treated Miss Kate kindly. Though much of her girlish beauty was gone, her posture slumped rather than upright as he’d remembered it, she was still the same woman who had, on occasion, sung in the choir that he had led so long ago back at the Harmony Grove schoolhouse. The older woman, her hair now white, still heavy and with the same lumbering walk and mannerisms, was the Kate Bender he’d known years earlier.

Neither, however, would admit to him that they had ever been in Kansas.

When he interviewed them separately, however, each was quick to point an accusing finger at the other. The elderly woman insisted that her daughter was the person who had been responsible for “that mess back in Kansas.” Meanwhile, Eliza told Dick that she was fearful that her mother was planning to poison her and her child, murdering them just as she had so many others, including “those poor people in Kansas.”

The local sheriff only shook his head as Dick described his strange conversations with the two prisoners. “Like I told you,” he said, “these Griffith women are strange folks.”

“To me,” Dick replied, “their name is Bender.” A name destined to live in infamy.
Sources:
Kansas State Historical Society and article by Edith Ross, 1928;
Frontier Times (Sept. 1929);
True West articles by Warren Kuhn, Don Martin (1954, 1959), Wikipedia;
Western Folklore (Robert Scott), 1950;
Tales of the Western Heartland, Harry Chapman, Ohio University Press, 1984;
True Tales of Old-Time Kansas, David Dary, University of Kansas Press, 1984;
Kansas Historical Quarterly, 1957.

Read More...

And the Award Goes to…

Okay, I’m going to be up front about this. I’m an unabashed fan of “lists.” If someone ranks the Best Do-Wop Songs of all time, I’m there to give it a hard look. Top 10 Places to Find the Best Chicken Fried Steak? Don’t bother me while I critique it carefully. The 10 Books You Must Read Before You Croak is right up my alley. For the crime buff there’s nothing better than the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted. You get the idea.

Never mind that it is a cheap and easy way for columnists and bloggers to fill space. Write your own personal, absolutely definitive list and the readers will come. It’s Journalism 101. I’m surprised someone hasn’t gotten around to doing a List of the 10 Best Lists.

Today, for the sake of argument and meeting another deadline, I offer up the Best True Crime Movies of All-Time. I’m not talking made-for-TV quickies, understand. For these you had to spring for a ticket down at the Multiplex (or at least rent the DVD). Only theatrical releases allowed here. Also, my definition of a “true crime movie” is one that deals with murder. No Serpico, French Connection or Dog Day Afternoon here.

And, sure, you may find cause to argue with the ranking or even some inclusion or omission. The dirty truth is that’s the real reason such lists are compiled in the first place. So, read carefully… then fire away.

1. The Onion Field (1979) – This adaptation of Joseph Wambaugh’s extraordinary book deals with the abduction of two Los Angeles police officers and murder of one following a routine traffic stop of a couple of small-time criminals. This emotionally-charged film focuses on how the life of the surviving officer, played by John Savage, spirals into bouts of guilt and depression. And while they are hardly the centerpiece of the movie, Ted Danson, as the murdered officer, and James Wood, one of the bad guys, are outstanding. What likely made this American tragedy work so well was the fact Wambaugh authored the screenplay.

2. In Cold Blood (1967) – Truman Capote will roll over in his grave if he learns I didn’t put this benchmark movie atop the list. After all, this psychological tale of the murder of the Clutter family in Holcomb, Kansas, was nominated for four Academy Awards, brilliantly done and is doubtless the best-known true crime movie in film history. Robert Blake’s performance as Perry Smith and Scott Wilson’s as Dick Hickock were nothing short of mesmerizing. Yet, a later TV miniseries (1996) did something I wish the theatrical movie had: It dealt a greater role to the victims of the senseless crime.

3. Lonely Hearts (2007) – Back in the ‘40s, self-professed lady’s man Raymond Fernandez and his girlfriend Martha Beck made a living scamming women corresponding with the Lonely Hearts Clubs that were popular in the day. This is an intense look at how these con artists bilked hundreds of women and murdered as many as 17. The movie stars John Travolta and James Gandolfini as the detectives who track down and capture the murderous couple. In real life, registered nurse Beck was overweight and hardly attractive. Still, the beautiful Salma Hayek, who plays Beck, lends a sexy atmosphere to the movie that is breath-taking. The original story sent the New York tabloids of the time into a sensation frenzy.

4. Badlands (1973) – Another sick love-gone-amok tale. Charlie Starkweather, a 19-year-old garbage man who idolizes rebel actor James Dean, and his 14-year-old girlfriend Caril Fugate stunned the nation in the ‘50s as they murdered the girl’s family, then took off on a killing spree across the Dakota badlands, eventually killing 11 people in three months. With Martin Sheen and Sissy Spacek in the lead roles, the movie is a hypnotoic view of going-nowhere kids briefly living a romantic Bonnie and Clyde life. The voice-over provided by Spacek is chilling.

5. Bully (2001) – If this pitch dark look at the drugs-sex-murderous underbelly of a teenage society in suburban Florida hadn’t been based on a book authored by long-time friend Jim Schutze (a two-time Best Fact Crime Edgar finalist), I probably would have skipped it. Even though I’d read the book before seeing the movie, I found the latter a disquieting experience. Mindful of River’s Edge, the small, independent film, shot in just 23 days, tells a harrowing story of youth gone haywire, carrying out the baseball bat murder of the school bully. The ensemble cast, led by Brad Renfro and Rachel Miner, is impressive.

6. Bonnie and Clyde (1967) – Having lived my life in the stomping grounds of the most well-known outlaw couple in American crime history, it was easy to find flaws in the Hollywood version of the lives and legend of Clyde Barrow and Bonnie Parker. That said, it was still an entertaining movie despite the over-glamorization and romanticizing of a couple of small-time robbers and killers. The Faye Dunaway-Warren Beatty chemistry jumped from the screen and the supporting cast, which included the likes of Gene Hackman and Estelle Parsons (who won an Academy Award for her portrayal as Clyde’s sister), was outstanding.

7. Compulsion (1959) – Before the gavel-to-gavel coverage of O.J. Simpson, there was the nationwide fascination with the Leopold and Loeb trial where the legendary Clarence Darrow defended two young University of Chicago students who, in a senseless attempt to prove themselves intellectually able to commit the perfect crime, murdered 14-year-old Bobby Franks in 1924. A courtroom drama in which the legendary Orson Wells plays the role of Darrow, it is a mesmerizing look at the passionate and eloquent effort of a gifted defense attorney’s attempt to save his clients – Nathan Leopold, 19, and Richard Loeb, 18 – from the death penalty. Though the movie is based on Meyer Levin’s 1956 novelization of events, there’s plenty of fact to justify its inclusion on this list.

8. Heavenly Creatures (1994) – If this wasn’t based on an actual event it would be almost impossible to buy into. In 1954, two teenage girls – Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme – murdered Parker’s mother who had tried in vain to break up their fantasy-driven relationship. Lending to the eerie quality of the movie is the fact it was filmed in Christchurch, New Zealand where the 15- and 16-year-old girls committed the horrendous crime. Kate Winslet and Melanie Lynskey are memorable as the misguided youngsters and the screenplay earned an Academy Award nomination. Only years later was it learned that Edgar-winning mystery writer Anne Perry is, in fact, the same Juliet Hulme who spent prison time for her role in the murder.

9. The Boston Strangler (1968) – During the early ‘60s, Albert DeSalvo allegedly terrorized, raped and murdered 11 Boston women before he was apprehended and convicted. Based on the Edgar-winning book by Gerold Frank, the movie is part police procedural, part psychological examination of a serial killer. Henry Fonda plays the dedicated lawman assigned to the case and, believe it or not, Tony Curtis is DeSalvo. I was never much of a Curtis fan until he out-did himself in this role. And Sally Kellerman does herself proud as the only survivor of a DeSalvo attack. Soon after DeSalvo was murdered in 1973 by a fellow prison inmate, the rumbling began that he might have been wrongly convicted.

10. Zodiac (2007) – I was skeptical about this one before seeing it. Based on Robert Graysmith’s bestseller, it deals with a still-unknown serial killer in the San Francisco Bay area during the ‘60s and ‘70s. No matter how good the screenplay and acting might be, I saw no way the movie could offer viewers a satisfactory ending since the crimes remain unsolved. But, by focusing on Graysmith’s obsession with the investigation and following the frustrations of the police, it works. Brian Cox, playing the role of famed lawyer Melvin Belli, is a scene-stealer. And, yep, I liked the ending.

Read More...

Bugliosi on the Art of True Crime

Over a decade has passed since I was assigned to travel to a college campus where Vince Bugliosi was speaking to an enthralled full house on the investigation of the madness that came to be known as the Manson Family Murders. Long after the applause had died and books had been autographed, the legendary attorney agreed to sit and chat.

As I recently looked over the transcript of our conversation that evening, it occurred to me that things he said then are just as relevant now. Here’s a sampling:

The marketplace now seems flooded with true crime books, particularly the quickly produced paperbacks of high profile cases. Any thoughts?

Bugliosi: “The main thing in non-fiction of any kind, I think, is credibility. That’s certainly what I strive for in my books. I’m afraid there are too many books coming out today that do not have any credibility and I can tell it right away when I read them. You can tell when people are glossing over things, when they’re writing things that are absurd.

“They come out much too quickly. I don’t think you can put out a good true crime book in a short period of time. I get calls from people doing a book and ask when they want it out and when they tell me they have a short deadline, I tell them they aren’t going to be able to do it; that they aren’t going to be able to produce a classy book.”

What, then, are the goals a true crime writer should strive toward?

Bugliosi: “When you’re dealing with non-fiction you owe it to history to make it as accurate as possible. These books affect people. They’re on the shelves for years. There’s a historical obligation to make them as accurate as possible. I spend a lot of time on my books, making sure everything is factual.

“I think the good ones are very educational. People learn a lot about the justice system from them. I try to be educational in all my books. I want to make money on them, of course, but my first motivation is to do something I can be proud of. Helter Skelter and Till Death Do Us Part, I’m told, are recommended reading in more law schools and criminal justice classes than any other books out there. And that means a lot more than even the fact they’ve been bestsellers.”

Did you aspire to write even before you became involved in the Charles Manson case?

Bugliosi: “Not consciously. One of the reasons I wrote Helter Skelter was the fact there were these hasty books coming out even before the verdict had been reached, each claiming to be the definitive book on the subject. I’d pick them up and see these outrageous things in them that never happened.

“I’d been approached to do a book on the case during the trial and wasn’t interested. Then, when the trial ended, there was no one of any stature, like Truman Capote or Joseph Wambaugh, contemplating a book on the subject, so I decided to do it.”

Since then it seems lawyers have really jumped into the true crime genre.

Bugliosi: “When Helter Skelter came out, it was one of the first books written by a prosecutor. Now, it seems, every prosecutor who tries an interesting case wants to do a book. I get calls and letters from them all the time, asking advice. In a lot of cases I tell them very frankly that they don’t have the material for a book.”

Are they primarily motivated by the reports of the profitability of true crime books?

Bugliosi: “True crime sells. It is profitable, but not like some seem to think. As a genre, I’m told, it does not sell anything like fictional mysteries do. So, contrary to popular belief, these books don’t sell as well as people might think.

“My publisher told me – and I’m not certain it is the truth – that there have been only three true crime books that have made it to No. 1 on the New York Times bestseller list: Helter Skelter, In Cold Blood and And The Sea Will Tell, the latter for just one week. Tommy Thompson’s Blood and Money never got higher than No. 4 or 5. Wambaugh’s The Onion Field never got higher than 5 or 6. And we’re talking about big books.”

Do you have books that rank as your personal favorites in the genre?

Bugliosi: “I thought Blood and Money was an exceptional true crime book. And I thought The Onion Field was very good. In Cold Blood was supposed to have been the first so-called ‘faction’ book in the field. But I’ve heard too many things since that book came out to indicate questions of credibility. Researchers who have talked with those mentioned in the book have been told that Capote never interviewed them or they never said what he wrote.”

Read More...

When Santa Robbed a Bank

Our purpose today is not to extend the weary debate on the current state of the true crime book genre but, rather to call attention to yet another venue that has swung open its doors. I’m not speaking of bad TV movies or the torn-from-the-headlines forensic flotsam of the cable channels. Not even gas bag blogs (with, ahem, certain exceptions).

No sir, today we’re talking of loftier matters. Theater.

On a recent stop in the West Texas community of Cisco (pop. 3,800), I visited the dress rehearsal of a gospel/bluegrass musical production of an extraordinary dinner theater play titled “The Great Santa Claus Bank Robbery.”

Sound familiar? Back in 1972, Texas writer A.C. Greene was a Best Fact Crime Edgar finalist with a book (The Santa Claus Bank Robbery) that covered the same ground: the 1927 robbery of Cisco’s First National Bank by a four-man gang led by a guy disguised in a Santa Claus suit. Fitting, since it was just two days before Christmas when the infamous robbery occurred.

In shorthand, here are the high- and lowlights of the legendary event:

Four less-than-brilliant robbers, three of them ex-cons, steal a car in Wichita Falls and drive 200 miles to little Cisco with plans to rob its bank. The leader, a former Cisco resident and wayward son of a local café owner, plans to wear a Santa Claus suit, complete with fake beard, borrowed from his landlady so nobody in his hometown will recognize him.

Now, as the mid-day robbery is underway, a customer and her daughter slip out the back door of the bank and alert the local police. Soon, the place is surrounded, not only by law enforcement but armed locals who are keenly aware of a recent promise by the Texas Bankers Association to pay a $5,000 reward to anyone killing a bank robber during the commission of the crime. A full-throttle gunfight ensues. Six local citizens are wounded and the police chief and one of his officers are killed. Two young girls are kidnapped and forced into the getaway car as hostages. The robbers, three of them also wounded, high-tail it out of town.

They’d not gone far, however, when they realized no one had thought to gas up the stolen car. The fuel gauge is on Empty. Then a tire is shot out. They stop a family that is innocently driving into town and steal their car. The family runs for the safety of a nearby farmhouse – the driver taking the car keys with them. So, after already having helped the most injured of their group into the second car and tossing in the bag with $12,500 taken from the bank, the robbers realize they can’t start it and have to hurry back to their original out-of-gas, flat-tired car and try to distance themselves from the oncoming posse. Alas, they leave the bag of stolen money behind. See the black comedy brewing?

Things get worse. After a week-long manhunt the bad guys are rounded up. One is given the death penalty, one gets a life sentence, another dies in the hospital. The leader, jailed in nearby Eastland, eventually becomes the victim of the last mob lynching on record in Texas when friends of the murdered police chief charge the jail, take him outside and hang him as a couple of thousand cheering locals look on.

Perfect stuff for a musical, right?

Billy Smith was sitting off-stage in the theater room of Cisco’s old Mobley Hotel (the very first hotel, by the way, purchased by the legendary Conrad Hilton; but that’s another story), strumming a banjo and watching intently as cast members rehearsed. As usual, the 51-year-old director of performing arts at Cisco Junior College was multi-tasking. He’s the author and director of the musical, member of a five-piece bluegrass band that performs during the production, set designer and self-proclaimed worrier.

On the rainy day that we visited, Smith was generally pleased as his young actors, dressed in ‘20s attire, were playing their true-life roles. Still, he urged the young artists-in-residence who had come from throughout the country to “have more fun with it.”
Considering his play is based on a bloody bank robbery, it seemed a tall order. But, hey, this is show biz, right? If Broadway can enjoy roaring success with a song-and-dance production like “Sweeney Todd,” wherein people are murdered and their bodies ground to make meat pies, why can’t “The Great Santa Claus Bank Robbery” be “fun”?

“From my perspective,” says Smith, “it is simply a play that combines comedy and drama and allows the audience to connect with the story. It’s farcical at times but it also has, I believe, real depth of character.”

The play the former Western Wyoming College director of theater has written never strays far from the facts. “As I did my research,” Smith says, “I found myself asking who the good guys in the story really were. On one hand you had these four greed-driven robbers who had no trouble shooting and killing people to steal money. On the other hand, you had townspeople, also driven by greed, who knew if they could shoot and kill a bank robber they could collect a $5,000 reward.”

What Smith ultimately came up with was a focus to which Greene and other historians had only given brief nod. The mother of ex-con Marshall Ratliff, the Santa-disguised leader of the robbers, had been a quiet, church-going lady. In Smith’s play, she becomes a focal character. So, too, does a fictional female known only as Lady Luck.

“Before he died of the gunshot wounds he received during the shoot-out, (Cisco police chief) Bit Bedford kept insisting that he’d been shot by a woman with long blonde hair,” the playwright explains. “Nowhere was there evidence that a woman was in any way involved in the robbery.” Still, her presence, perceived by the dying and delirious victim, fascinated Smith. So much so that he wrote her into the play, not as a participant in the crime but, rather a vamp-like narrator of some of the events.

Colleen Smith, Cisco Junior College president, recalls how her husband agonized over ways to tell the sweeping story that includes shootouts, car chases, trials and a mob hanging on stage. “As he was writing it,” she recalls, “he was totally obsessed, not only with the writing, but with finding ways to solve the many story line problems that telling a true story presents.”

Smith ultimately did so by writing 14 original songs that move the entertaining production along.

As I watched, I was reminded of another remarkable true crime-to-stage musical that deals with a historic case. “Parade,” written by Alfred Uhry and Jason Robert Brown, tells the story of the 1913 murder of 13-year-old Mary Phagan and won the 1999 Tony Award for Best Musical. In this play, the young victim worked in an Atlanta pencil factory managed by a man named Leo Franks and was found dead on Confederates Memorial Day. Though there was little evidence that he committed the crime, Franks was convicted.

Like Cisco’s Santa, Marshall Ratliff, was ultimately the victim of a mob lynching.

And, finally, even as we speak a Fort Worth, Tex., theater ensemble is preparing to debut “Las Mujeres de Juarez (The Women of Juarez),” based on the true story of the unsolved murders of hundreds of border town women, most of them maquiladoras who worked in foreign-owned factories in the Mexico city.

This one’s all drama, no music. Still, I’m ordering my tickets.

Read More...

Texas, My Texas: An Introduction

You’ll not likely find the description in any literary text but, simply put, I have spent my writing career acting as a match-maker. I’ve sought out people and places, situations and circumstances that interest me to a degree that I feel duty bound to share them with others. Whether it is a well-hidden parcel of West Texas landscape where the second largest meteor crater in the U.S. is located or the office of internationally famous Houston attorney Richard (Racehorse) Haynes, where he spins colorful tales of headline-making cases, rich and interesting subject matter lures me. Small Texas towns visited by unspeakable evil have served as dark and troubling locales for a too-lengthy list of true crime books and in little Penelope, population 211, I found a six-man football team that unites a determined community. Such unique stories are prime grist for a non-fiction writer’s mill. And I’m ever so delighted to serve as the middle man. Mr. and Mrs. Reader, please allow me to introduce you to…

And while, admittedly, I’ve sometimes tended the mortgage and bought the groceries by accepting travel fare to faraway places, there to interview celebrities ranging from self-important movie stars to stuffy politicians and business world wheelers and dealers, rarely do I recall them as moments of any great achievement and will mention them no further. I’ve dutifully recorded and written all the clever-but-well-worn phrases and talking points others before me have heard and reported. As I’ve said, it helps pay the bills, even if one is occasionally forced to type with one hand while holding his nose with the other. It is what you do if you aren’t Stephen King or haven’t experienced the good fortune to have a Rich Aunt Sally pass along that small fortune she’d secretly rat-holed through all those scrimp-and-save years down at the Old Folks Home.

Truth is, however, financial reward seldom enters the picture when one stumbles upon the magical subject that begs to be written; the one nobody else has discovered or, had they, somehow failed to see its true merit. If I have a valid talent to claim, it is in the recognition of (and appreciation for) stories that lend themselves to a broader readership than one might at first expect.

They are out there, along the backroads, off the interstate, in the big city back alleys and I have long been their happy hunter.

Give me the little no-stop-light community of Hye, Tex., where, back in the long ago days of town baseball, the team was made up of nine brothers and I’m on the phone to Sports Illustrated. How about Asherton High School which suffered through the longest losing streak in schoolboy football history? Pull up a chair and let me tell you about it. In the rugged and harsh terrain of the Texas Trans-Pecos region I discovered a man named Trent Jones in the near-ghost town of Terlingua, teaching eight grades in the state’s only remaining one-room school. Another book was born.

Rich and varied, there are Texas yarns to be spun in every direction. And I’ve got the pedometer to prove it. I’ve traveled up into the Panhandle to sit at the kitchen table with a couple of Wicca devotees accused of murder, then to Texarkana to write about the legendary and never apprehended Phantom Killer. Out on the High Plains I visited with folks in little O’Donnell, where former Bonanza star Dan Blocker spent his boyhood, and the editor at TV Guide saw fit to make it a cover story.

With an apology to my fiction-writing friends, you can’t make this stuff up.

Which begs the question I’ve routinely heard when invited to speak to book clubs or noon gatherings of Rotarians: Where do you get your ideas?

I’d dearly love to brag that it is some degree of crafty investigative know-how, maybe even direction divinely sent. Alas, it is far simpler. Stir in equal parts dumb luck, friendly phone calls and a large dose of garden variety curiosity and you’ve got all one needs. That and a keen awareness that Texas is brim-full of serial killers and millionaires, brilliant lawyers and crooked politicians, great educators and superb athletes, musicians, artists and actors, oddballs galore and, most important, ordinary people with extraordinary stories to tell.

Visits to such people and places have, in recent years, served as a brief and welcomed escape from more lengthy and demanding writing tasks. With not the slightest intent, I became, in the wake of the mid-‘80s success of a non-fiction book titled Careless Whispers, a true crime writer. While not even searching for a genre pigeon hole to climb into, I found myself fitted into one. Not, understand, that I’m either complaining or apologizing. A homebody writer can’t be choosy.

For the better part of two decades, when my agent and/or editor would ask what I planned my next book project to be, they already had the answer in mind: Another true crime book.

I dutifully obliged at 18-month to two-year intervals, always careful to pick Texas settings. In the small town of Midlothian I wrote of a young undercover police officer who, while posing as a high school student in an effort to ferret out local drug dealers, was shot and killed by the 16-year-old son of a Dallas policeman. The crime and all of the tragic irony in Innocence Lost, however, played second chair to the story of the devastation it rained on the once-quiet community. When, after five years of futile investigation, the Richardson police finally determined that a wealthy socialite had orchestrated the hired killing of her husband’s girlfriend, I chose to write Open Secrets, chasing a serpentine and bizarre case from Texas to France and back. After spending considerable time in little Alvin, south of Houston, To The Last Breath resulted, telling of three remarkable women – a private investigator/grandmother, a police detective and an assistant district attorney – who combined efforts to prove that a demented father was, in fact, responsible for the death of his two-year-old daughter.

If one need proof that we do, indeed, live in a small world, know that the origin of a Wichita Falls-based book, Scream at the Sky, began with a call from the sister of a young woman who had been close friends of one of the victims I’d written about in Careless Whispers. Her sister, too, had been murdered, her case and that of several other young women who were killed unsolved for 15 years. The subject matter presented a new challenge; that of weaving several stories into one, providing the reader some insight into how families, none previously known to each other, had negotiated through a decade and a half of wondering who had brutally stolen the lives of their children.

Once again the research process put me into the company of a remarkable cast of characters and in a vast and stark part of Texas about which I’d never before written.

And once more, as I’ve done throughout most of my professional life, I was match-making. A bad way to make a living, it ain’t.

Read More...