..and a surprise quite a few recordists have capitalized on. Some might recall that it was Eric Benjamin who suggested and later bench tested the AT-3032's after discussion on this list about the nee
Posted by: "Rob Danielson" I had a few people ask, so photographed the process of making one last year and put the pages up. There have been a few people who at least started to make their own. I did
There's also an issue with the complex "comb filtering" created by reflections inside the dish which seems to be less with cardioids than omnis. If the focus/microphone is inside the edge of the para
. Eric has measured it 8dBA. I've used mine beside my mkh 40 and it had lowe= r Hi Walt-- When Eric measures and prints "8dB(A)" self noise, I tend believe him. He has an pseudo-anechoic chamber and
thanks for the links, rob! dan dugan, i hope its allright to you if i ask you one or two questions about your comparison. hope you are around... you compared the neumann mks with the at 3032. but wit
Unfortunately, I think not. How about two cardioids in separate, big, parabolic dishes with an adjustable parallax for stereo? Rob D. -- Rob Danielson Peck School of the Arts Department of Film Unive
Hi EVS Sorry. The link was in my eariler post: http://www.trackseventeen.com such as: http://www.trackseventeen.com/soundscapes/x060405i-crex_frogs_short.mp3 II don't see links to Curts omni rigs but
Why would you generalize that cardioids are better? Maybe someone knows how much of a parabolic dish would be ideally covered evenly by each mic if stereo or by one mic if monaural. When I compare th
in theory, it should be an omni mic, but in practice, cardioids work better= . all you need to make sure is that it is a widish cardioid, so it 'sees' t= he whole dish and not just a small part. umas
correct, but cardioids are much more sensitive to handling and wind noise. Klas. Telinga Microphones, Botarbo, S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden. Phone & fax int + 295 310 01 email: telinga@bahnhof.se website: w