Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

About that London Stock Exchange IT failure

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Ramon F Herrera

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 11:46:03 AM9/17/08
to

Microsoft crashes the London Stock Exchange... again.

"It’s the third one in a year and worse even than last year’s November
8th failure. "

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=1242&tag=nl.e539

-RFH

nes...@wigner.berkeley.edu

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 11:55:24 AM9/17/08
to

He goes on to point out how Microsoft used the contract as a way of
putting Linux down:

"All of which should have you wonder what Linux has to do with any of
this - Microsoft’s headline, you’ll recall said that the LSE picked
Windows over Linux for reliability.

The answer is that Linux has nothing to do with any of this: Microsoft
simply hung an anti-Linux label on a very carefully worded story about
a pair of committed Microsoft partners, HP and Accenture, getting
together with Microsoft to sell rather simple technology to a willing
customer - and neither Linux nor Solaris is mentioned anywhere in the
text."

Part of the "Get the 'Facts'" campaign.

amicus_curious

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 12:41:56 PM9/17/08
to

<nes...@wigner.berkeley.edu> wrote in message
news:e046714b-a93b-4fca...@q26g2000prq.googlegroups.com...

>The answer is that Linux has nothing to do with any of this: Microsoft
>simply hung an anti-Linux label on a very carefully worded story about
>a pair of committed Microsoft partners, HP and Accenture, getting
>together with Microsoft to sell rather simple technology to a willing
>customer - and neither Linux nor Solaris is mentioned anywhere in the
>text."

I think that you have to read between the lines to get the real story here.
What it says is that, given an opportunity to acquire some business as a
result of Tandem's demise, Microsoft and its partners went to the well and
came away with the prize. The Linux/Unix proponents, on the other hand,
chose to sit back on their hands and count on their laurels to somehow bring
this business their way. Since that has failed to occur, they are reduced
once again to snide remarks about their opponents. There seems to be a lot
more of that going on these days.

You could blame it on monopoly practices, I suppose. That is better than
blaming yourself.

bbgruff

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 12:51:08 PM9/17/08
to
amicus_curious wrote:

> they are reduced
> once again to snide remarks about their opponents.  There seems to be a lot
> more of that going on these days.

Go for it son - I'm right with you on this!

Point them to Microsoft "Get The Facts" - that'll show 'em!

Steve de Mena

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 3:30:49 PM9/17/08
to

Maybe you can point to where in the article the cause of the outages
was determined to be Microsoft?

Steve

Roy Schestowitz

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 3:46:37 PM9/17/08
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ Steve de Mena on Wednesday 17 September 2008 19:30 : \____

"The London Stock Exchange Group PLC said Tuesday that a software glitch - and
                                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
not high trading volumes - was to blame for a seven-hour shutdown that angered
customers on one of the busiest days of the year on world equity markets."


http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5h7qZJLteXf0POgW7sQvvo3ze7oXw

London Stock Exchange in denial over system outage

,----[ Quote ]
| The LSE absolved its core TradElect platform from blame. The system, designed
| and built by Accenture, runs on HP ProLiant Servers and Microsoft .Net and
| SQL Server 2000 systems. Accenture declined to comment on Monday's events.
| The LSE said, "we won't discuss dealings with our individual suppliers".
|
| Bob McDowall, senior analyst at Tower Group, said sparse explanations
| provided by the LSE so far were “not very satisfactory”.
`----

http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/it-business/it-organisation/news/index.cfm?newsid=10947


London Stock Exchange trading derailed by computer crash on frenzied day

,----[ Quote ]
| Trading on the London Stock Exchange has been halted after a computer system
| failed on one of the most frantic days of trading so far this year.
|
| FTSE 100: trading on the London Stock Exchange halted after computer systems
| failed
|
| In an embarrassment for the LSE, the exchange said that no orders can be
| entered or executions of those trades occur. The LSE plans to bring back
| trading in a “controlled way’’, but couldn't say how long that will take.
`----

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/money/2008/09/08/bcnlse408.xml


London Stock Exchange blames outage on Infolect

,----[ Quote
| The outage hit shortly before close of trading and forced the exchange
| to extend its closing auction by a hour and a half, from 4.30pm until
| 6pm. Even so it was reported that that some traders left for the day
| with trades unexecuted
|
| Infolect was launched two years ago in place of the exchange’s London
| Market Information Link platform. It uses Microsoft .net technology and
| a SQL Server database
`----

http://www.cio.co.uk/concern/security/news/index.cfm?articleid=2248&pagtype=allchantopdate


Furse should not resign, she should be sacked

,----[ Quote ]
| Comment The farce of the London Stock Exchange not only crashing but failing
| to get its systems up and running again should surprise no one.
|
| Well, no one except LSE boss Clara Furse, who demonstrates little
| understanding that technology is crucial to her business.
|
| I’ve worked for members of the London Stock Exchange and everyone agrees she
| is world-class at corporate presentations, but the evidence that she can
| actually run things is rather harder to come by.
|
| No one expects her to write FIX handlers, or optimise an order-matching
| engine, but her yes-men simply were not in the position to make any
| intelligent decisions on technology, if we look at the board of the LSE.
|
| Do we see anything that even looks like experience in technology? No. We see
| three from the media, and of course accountancy, but no mention of
| technology.
|
| To be sure, the CIO (not on the board) is ex-Accenture man David Lester. To a
| Reg reader, Accenture will be associated in the context of technology with
| the words “screw up”, “late”, and “over budget”. Clara Furse cannot be held
| responsible for problems with Cisco switches - one of the suggested
| culprits - but she is absolutely in the frame for the choice of senior
| management and strategic vendors.
`----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/13/furse_lse_comment/


NYSE Euronext banks on Red Hat

,----[ Quote ]
| If anyone out there persists in believing that Linux isn't ready for serious
| prime time, NYSE Euronext's dependence on Red Hat should finally lay that
| silly notion to rest. As announced, the New York Stock Exchange Euronext
| dumped its proprietary UNIX heritage (AIX, HP UX, Solaris) for the freedom,
| flexibility, and performance of Linux.
`----

http://www.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-9942680-16.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=TheOpenRoad


Linux steps up to power NZ Stock Exchange

,----[ Quote ]
| The New Zealand Stock Exchange is moving to a Linux platform for its
| settlement and clearing system, replacing its existing HP NonStop platform
| and applications in order to reduce cost and increase flexibility.
`----

http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/F586239BCCA7593FCC2573F00001488E


HP Linux servers bolster NYSE trading app

,----[ Quote ]
| "We favor Linux for what we do. We don't want to be beholden to any one
| [hardware or software] supplier, even if it is very good. We want the freedom
| to be vendor-independent, so Linux was a good choice," said Rubinow.
`----

http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1285921,00.html


Microsoft is the world's biggest cause of zombie remailers

,----[ Quote ]
| In China, it would take about one and one-half years wages (for the
| average Chinese) to buy a legitimate copy of Windows Vista. If you
| could find it here.
|
| Microsoft is the biggest cause of zombie remailers in the world,
| because they make noises, but do not do anything to address the
| real digital inequities in the world.
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38202


Pump and dump spam comes to Europe

,----[ Quote ]
| Earlier this month, the US Securities and Exchange Commission
| (SEC) had suspended trading in 35 companies that were found to
| be commonly referenced in pump-and-dump stock email campaigns.
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38607


SEC goes after stock spammers, hackers

,----[ Quote ]
| The SEC action to freeze the assets is the third filed in as many
| months involving market manipulation schemes conducted through
| online account intrusions. In the past the SEC has also taken
| action against individuals who allegedly broke into financial
| news Web sites or news release services.
|
| [...]
|
| "When spam clogs our mailboxes, it's annoying. When it rips
| off investors, it's illegal and destructive," SEC Chairman
| Christopher Cox said in a statement.
`----

http://news.com.com/2100-7348_3-6165804.html?part=rss&tag=2547-1_3-0-20&subj=news


,----[ Quote ]
| Problems found in an audit of Diebold tabulation records from an Ohio
| November 2006 election raise questions about whether the database got
| corrupted during the tabulation of election results...
|
| The database is built from Microsoft's Jet database engine. The
| engine, according to Microsoft, is vulnerable to corruption when a lot
| of concurrent activity is happening with the database, such as what
| occurs on an election night [and Microsoft advises againt using Jet in
| a complex environment]...
|
| The report mentions that election staff had trouble with the server
| crashing and freezing on election night....
|
| The report notes that with punch card machines election officials used
| to be able to determine definitively if all ballots had been counted
| in the results....
`----

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/04/diebold_vote_da.html


,----[ Quote ]
| "Nineteen machines had 21 screen freezes or system crashes, producing a
| blue screen and messages about an "illegal operation" or a "fatal
| exception error."
|
| "Especially with this blue-screen problem, you don't know whether it's
| the printer drivers, you don't know whether it's Diebold's own code or
| whether it's Windows,"
`----

http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?id=6257


Mainframe Linux at SHARE

,----[ Quote ]
| Everyone is already using Linux somewhere, Elliott said, but there are still
| people who are afraid to put their mission-critical applications on it for
| fear that it is not robust enough.
`----

http://www.linux.com/feature/118624


Open source and mission critical: The Linux application server landscape

,----[ Quote ]
| In 2005, Michael Dortch, executive editor and director of IT infrastructure
| management strategies at the Robert Frances Group, penned a report comparing
| Linux application server total cost of ownership (TCO) with Microsoft's
| Windows and Sun Microsystems' Solaris. In that report, Linux won handily,
| prompting Dortch to recommend that all IT managers at least give the Linux
| application server a serious look for mission-critical data center tasks.
|
| [...]
|
| What a lot of our clients are finding today, however, is that, with Linux and
| open source application servers, the wisdom of the crowd has solved those
| standards-based problems. And because the management tools are freely
| available and malleable, they find that the big sell was "cheap and free" but
| is now "What will complete my processes faster?" Open source used to be
| inexpensive and free, but now IT is finding value [in it] because it's more
| responsive and responsive.
`----

http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1264755,00.html?track=NL-825&ad=597846&asrc=EM_USC_1828806&uid=2087385


Forrester: Open source is everywhere, and increasingly used for
mission-critical applications

,----[ Quote ]
| Forrester just issued an insightful report on the increasing adoption
| of open source in the enterprise. The verdict? Open source is everywhere,
| and taking an ever-increasing piece of the enterprise pie
`----

http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/05/forrester_open_1.html


Open Source Slowly Gains Momentum on Wall Street

,----[ Quote ]
| Customers may be comfortable using Linux for infrastructure-type
| systems but less so for business software, said Monica Kumar,
| senior director of product manager for Linux and open-source
| software at Oracle.
`----

http://www.adtmag.com/article.aspx?id=20569


Linux Crossing Threshold to Real Mission Critical Computing

,----[ Quote ]
| ...Linux developers are steadily chipping away at the most
| significant functional gaps that limited its suitability for
| these workloads in the past, allowing it to progress far beyond the
| "edge of network" domain where it has traditionally thrived. The
| impressive wins by Novell and Red Hat prove that user perceptions
| about Linux's limitations are gradually crumbling as well.
`----

http://ideasint.blogs.com/ideasinsights/2007/04/linux_crossing_.html


Linux goes to Wall Street, puts on a show

,----[ Quote ]
| "The Financial Services firms are leading the enterprise adoption of
| open source technology, including Linux," says Zachary. "By watching
| the consumption patterns of these firms, open source vendors can
| gain a good understanding of the types of products and services
| that are commercially viable.
|
| [...]
|
| "We see a growing role for open source software beyond Linux in
| financial services companies and that's why many companies are
| expanding the governance policies and procedures around using
| open source software."
`----

http://community.linux.com/article.pl?sid=07/04/22/1310216&from=rss


Next Gen, Mission-Critical Apps To Be Deployed on Linux Says Report

,----[ Quote ]
| By now it should be obvious to even the most casual industry observers
| that Linux operating systems - and open source-based software in general -
| have reached critical marketplace mass. Recent Linux deals and
| announcements by Oracle and Microsoft have only reinforced the "open
| source is enterprise-grade" message that IBM, Unisys and other "Master
| Brand" hardware, software and services vendors have been preaching for
| years. In short, open source, especially Linux, is becoming "legitimized"
| by the major vendors for enterprise environments, and user executives
| are more than happy to believe them.
`----

http://www.linuxelectrons.com/News/RoundUp/Next_Gen_MissionCritical_Apps_To_Be_Deployed_on_Linux_Says_Report


CIO study finds Linux ready for prime-time

,----[ Quote ]
| The company predicts a steep rise: only 18 percent of businesses
| will be using Linux in business-critical roles by the end of 2007.
|
| "Linux operating systems - and open source-based software in general
| - have reached critical marketplace mass," said the study's authors,
| Bruce Guptill and Bill McNee of Saugatuck Research.
`----

http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=7681

End of signed message

- --
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | Open Source Othello: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
run-level 5 Sep 17 16:20 last=S
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkjRXp0ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4j+QCfTbLckYs1+6G3CqID/a5HsMzP
x9kAn1SknWYPhjIK7q7AEZrSo+vaSg1u
=crXp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Roger

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 4:17:45 PM9/17/08
to
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:46:37 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ____/ Steve de Mena on Wednesday 17 September 2008 19:30 : \____
>
>> Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>>> Microsoft crashes the London Stock Exchange... again.
>>>

>>> "Its the third one in a year and worse even than last years


>>> November 8th failure. "
>>>
>>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=1242&tag=nl.e539
>>>
>>> -RFH
>>>
>>>
>> Maybe you can point to where in the article the cause of the outages
>> was determined to be Microsoft?
>>
>> Steve
>
> "The London Stock Exchange Group PLC said Tuesday that a software glitch
> - and                                            
>              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Yes, it was a "software glitch" but that doesn't answer his question. Only
a complete retard would think that every bit of software running on the
LSE was written by Microsoft.

Did it ever occur to your 3 retarded brain cells that perhaps the LSE
wrote some custom software that had the problem?


Try sticking to subjects that you actually have a clue about. Basically
shut your mouth and let the grown ups talk.

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 4:24:41 PM9/17/08
to

Unlike others that are frothing at the mouth to pin this on Microsoft, I
really don't give a rats ass as long as they do get to the bottom of it.

I still have not seen any information that definitively confirms that it
was Microsoft software that was the cause.

Software breaks, including Microsoft, Linux and everything else out there.

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Please Visit www.linsux.org

Rex Ballard

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 6:19:55 PM9/17/08
to
On Sep 17, 12:41 pm, "amicus_curious" <A...@sti.net> wrote:
> <ness...@wigner.berkeley.edu> wrote in message
> news:e046714b-a93b-4fca...@q26g2000prq.googlegroups.com...

> I think that you have to read between the lines to get the real story here.


> What it says is that, given an opportunity to acquire some business as a
> result of Tandem's demise, Microsoft and its partners went to the well and
> came away with the prize.

This was a high-profile win, and if Microsoft had been able to pull it
off, Microsoft would have been able to crow about it for years.

Unfortunately, it's also very visible when the system has an
unscheduled hiccup. And Microsoft has to pay the price of blowing it
in a very public arena.

The Linux powered cash registers at KFC aren't near as glamorous as
the London Stock Exchange, but it's a very strategic win, because
Linux can show real numbers and real success for years that can be
used as a reference on other accounts. I don't know if the back-end
server is still SCO or not, but it could easily be Linux.

> The Linux/Unix proponents, on the other hand,
> chose to sit back on their hands and count on their laurels to somehow bring
> this business their way.

I'm sure that bidding was competitive and aggressive. And I'm sure
that Microsoft made some aggressive claims about their own
reliability. Microsoft relied on intense redundancy and scheduled
down-time that was excluded from the availability calculations. The
MTBF isn't really all that bad, only 3 times per year is pretty good -
for Windows.

Where Microsoft really screwed the pooch was on the recovery time, the
Mean Time To Repair.

It seems that even with lots of redundancy, critical systems failed in
such a manner as to trigger a very long recovery time, and THAT is a
real embarrassment. Imagine if NASDAQ, NYSE, or AMEX shut down for
several hours, especially during a sell-off.

bbgruff

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 7:00:36 PM9/17/08
to
Roger wrote:

> Try sticking to subjects that you actually have a clue about. Basically
> shut your mouth and let the grown ups talk.

Excellent advice.

I trust that we can look forward to you following it, son?

Tim Smith

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 9:10:42 PM9/17/08
to
In article <1418606.T...@schestowitz.com>,
Roy Schestowitz <newsg...@schestowitz.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ____/ Steve de Mena on Wednesday 17 September 2008 19:30 : \____
>
> >

> > Maybe you can point to where in the article the cause of the outages
> > was determined to be Microsoft?
> >
> > Steve
>
> "The London Stock Exchange Group PLC said Tuesday that a software glitch -
> and
>                                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> not high trading volumes - was to blame for a seven-hour shutdown that
> angered
> customers on one of the busiest days of the year on world equity markets."
>
>
> http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5h7qZJLteXf0POgW7sQvvo3ze7oXw

That's nice. Now, how about taking a crack at answering Steve's
question?

Last time I checked, Microsoft does not sell stock exchange operations
software (no, "Microsoft Exchange" is not stock market operations
software). Do you have *any* evidence that the problem wasn't do to
problems with software written by a third party?

--
--Tim Smith

Steve de Mena

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 9:20:40 PM9/17/08
to
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ____/ Steve de Mena on Wednesday 17 September 2008 19:30 : \____
>
>> Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>>> Microsoft crashes the London Stock Exchange... again.
>>>
>>> "It’s the third one in a year and worse even than last year’s November
>>> 8th failure. "
>>>
>>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=1242&tag=nl.e539
>>>
>>> -RFH
>>>
>> Maybe you can point to where in the article the cause of the outages
>> was determined to be Microsoft?
>>
>> Steve
>
> "The London Stock Exchange Group PLC said Tuesday that a software glitch - and
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> not high trading volumes - was to blame for a seven-hour shutdown that angered
> customers on one of the busiest days of the year on world equity markets."

"The LSE, which is facing increasing competition from new European
trading platforms, also attempted to reassure traders unhappy about
the blackout, saying that it had changed the software programming so
that a similar problem would not have such a huge effect."

Sounds like a bug in the program they wrote. How is this a
Microsoft OS of Microsoft application issue?

Steev

Alan Baker

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 9:51:25 PM9/17/08
to
In article <rtWdnagr6KB0x0zV...@giganews.com>,

Steve de Mena <st...@stevedemena.com> wrote:

> Ramon F Herrera wrote:
> > Microsoft crashes the London Stock Exchange... again.
> >

> > "It零 the third one in a year and worse even than last year零 November


> > 8th failure. "
> >
> > http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=1242&tag=nl.e539
> >
> > -RFH
> >
>
> Maybe you can point to where in the article the cause of the outages
> was determined to be Microsoft?
>
> Steve

LOL

Ran solid as a rock for years pre-Microsoft.

Three outages in one year post-Microsoft.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>

Roy Schestowitz

unread,
Sep 18, 2008, 2:44:40 AM9/18/08
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ Steve de Mena on Thursday 18 September 2008 01:20 : \____

We don't know for sure and they refuse to tell. We do know that it wasn't a
hardware/network issue (by "connectivity" they meant they could not reach LSE
because it was down). Accenture worked closely with Microsoft on that one
(offshore contract).

Either way, Get the Facts is false advertising and someone should take that up
with the ASA.

- --
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | Download Othello: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com | Open Prospects | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 138 total, 1 running, 131 sleeping, 1 stopped, 5 zombie
http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkjR+NgACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5vqgCgn1WA/tBCGNteKtTkDkshSANp
9gQAnieMTmYyQ3CkjdjbWBn7YOCbWjjI
=ZApz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hadron

unread,
Sep 18, 2008, 4:16:58 AM9/18/08
to
Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net> writes:

> In article <rtWdnagr6KB0x0zV...@giganews.com>,
> Steve de Mena <st...@stevedemena.com> wrote:
>
>> Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>> > Microsoft crashes the London Stock Exchange... again.
>> >

>> > "It¹s the third one in a year and worse even than last year¹s November


>> > 8th failure. "
>> >
>> > http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=1242&tag=nl.e539
>> >
>> > -RFH
>> >
>>
>> Maybe you can point to where in the article the cause of the outages
>> was determined to be Microsoft?
>>
>> Steve
>
> LOL
>
> Ran solid as a rock for years pre-Microsoft.
>
> Three outages in one year post-Microsoft.

Err, what ran steady as a rock? The OLD SW? What SW are they NOW using?
Last time I looked I never saw "MS Stock Exchange SW" in their catalog.

--
This year with the release of XP, they are actually behind. The end days
are near for the BIOS reading inferior OS. It is inevitable.
comp.os.linux.advocacy - where they put the lunacy in advocacy

amicus_curious

unread,
Sep 18, 2008, 9:16:47 AM9/18/08
to

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-787F4...@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net...

> In article <rtWdnagr6KB0x0zV...@giganews.com>,
> Steve de Mena <st...@stevedemena.com> wrote:
>
>> Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>> > Microsoft crashes the London Stock Exchange... again.
>> >
>> > "It零 the third one in a year and worse even than last year零 November
>> > 8th failure. "
>> >
>> > http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=1242&tag=nl.e539
>> >
>> > -RFH
>> >
>>
>> Maybe you can point to where in the article the cause of the outages
>> was determined to be Microsoft?
>>
>> Steve
>
> LOL
>
> Ran solid as a rock for years pre-Microsoft.
>
You don't know that. Else why would they be looking to change it?

Alan Baker

unread,
Sep 18, 2008, 9:34:19 PM9/18/08
to
In article <48d254df$0$17668$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com>,
"amicus_curious" <AC...@sti.net> wrote:

The article says as much. Try reading.

Alan Baker

unread,
Sep 18, 2008, 9:35:10 PM9/18/08
to
In article <gat2s1$ho9$6...@registered.motzarella.org>,
Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net> writes:
>
> > In article <rtWdnagr6KB0x0zV...@giganews.com>,
> > Steve de Mena <st...@stevedemena.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Ramon F Herrera wrote:
> >> > Microsoft crashes the London Stock Exchange... again.
> >> >
> >> > "It¹s the third one in a year and worse even than last year¹s November
> >> > 8th failure. "
> >> >
> >> > http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=1242&tag=nl.e539
> >> >
> >> > -RFH
> >> >
> >>
> >> Maybe you can point to where in the article the cause of the outages
> >> was determined to be Microsoft?
> >>
> >> Steve
> >
> > LOL
> >
> > Ran solid as a rock for years pre-Microsoft.
> >
> > Three outages in one year post-Microsoft.
>
> Err, what ran steady as a rock? The OLD SW? What SW are they NOW using?
> Last time I looked I never saw "MS Stock Exchange SW" in their catalog.

Whatever they are using, it's not getting the job done. They went from a
single machine which never gave them problems to 120 HP servers running
Windows....

...and now they have crashes.

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:31:13 AM9/19/08
to

Yup, rather naive assessment by AC.

--
HPT
Quando omni flunkus moritati
(If all else fails, play dead)
- "Red" Green

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:41:25 AM9/19/08
to
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Steve de Mena on Thursday :

>
>> Sounds like a bug in the program they wrote. How is this
>> a Microsoft OS of Microsoft application issue?
>
> We don't know for sure and they refuse to tell. We do know
> that it wasn't a hardware/network issue (by "connectivity"
> they meant they could not reach LSE because it was down).
> Accenture worked closely with Microsoft on that one (offshore
> contract).
>
> Either way, Get the Facts is false advertising and someone
> should take that up with the ASA.

Interesting how the astroturfers defend their precious OS tooth
and nail, it's the other guys fault, and spread FUD that Linux is
always not quite there, bid failure on Linux part to win
contract, ad nauseum.

Yes, I agree with you.

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:43:55 AM9/19/08
to
Alan Baker wrote:

> Hadron wrote:
>
>> Err, what ran steady as a rock? The OLD SW? What SW are they
>> NOW using? Last time I looked I never saw "MS Stock Exchange
>> SW" in their catalog.
>
> Whatever they are using, it's not getting the job done. They
> went from a single machine which never gave them problems to
> 120 HP servers running Windows....
>
> ...and now they have crashes.

Look on the positive. It keeps toner monkeys employed.

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:44:49 AM9/19/08
to

Nobody here is defending Microsoft.

We are simply saying that you loons have not proved that it is a Microsoft
problem....

And you haven't....

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:45:26 AM9/19/08
to
Alan Baker wrote:
> "amicus_curious" wrote:
>> "Alan Baker" wrote...

>>
>>> Ran solid as a rock for years pre-Microsoft.
>>
>> You don't know that. Else why would they be looking to
>> change it?
>
> The article says as much. Try reading.

Illiteracy seems to run high with our Wintrolls.

Steve de Mena

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:46:50 AM9/19/08
to
High Plains Thumper wrote:
> Alan Baker wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> Err, what ran steady as a rock? The OLD SW? What SW are they
>>> NOW using? Last time I looked I never saw "MS Stock Exchange
>>> SW" in their catalog.
>>
>> Whatever they are using, it's not getting the job done. They
>> went from a single machine which never gave them problems to
>> 120 HP servers running Windows....
>>
>> ...and now they have crashes.
>
> Look on the positive. It keeps toner monkeys employed.

What is a "toner monkey"? In the corporations I have worked for users
replaced toners themselves in the printers.

Steve

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:49:14 AM9/19/08
to
Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:

> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> Yes, I agree with you.
>
> Nobody here is defending Microsoft.
>
> We are simply saying that you loons have not proved that it is
................................^^^^^

Nice insult MoGo, only proves you're an idiot.

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:52:22 AM9/19/08
to
Steve de Mena wrote:
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> Look on the positive. It keeps toner monkeys employed.
>
> What is a "toner monkey"? In the corporations I have worked
> for users replaced toners themselves in the printers.

Oh, I see, nice shot, "user".

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:53:22 AM9/19/08
to
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:49:14 -0600, High Plains Thumper wrote:

> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I agree with you.
>>
>> Nobody here is defending Microsoft.
>>
>> We are simply saying that you loons have not proved that it is
> ................................^^^^^
>
> Nice insult MoGo, only proves you're an idiot.

Nice dodge...
Like I said, despite all your chomping at the bit and frothing like a rabid
dog in heat, you still have not proved Microsoft was behind the crash.

They very well might have been, but you haven't proved that.....

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:54:13 AM9/19/08
to
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:45:26 -0600, High Plains Thumper wrote:

> Alan Baker wrote:
>> "amicus_curious" wrote:
>>> "Alan Baker" wrote...
>>>
>>>> Ran solid as a rock for years pre-Microsoft.
>>>
>>> You don't know that. Else why would they be looking to
>>> change it?
>>
>> The article says as much. Try reading.
>
> Illiteracy seems to run high with our Wintrolls.

Speaking of illiteracy, HPT, show me where it says Microsoft is responsible
for the failure.

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:57:21 AM9/19/08
to

It's what HPT does for a living, which is why he knows the term....

IOW he puts paper in one end of a high speed laser printer and pulls the
output from the other end....

We are talking about something like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APRpKRohX2U

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:59:05 AM9/19/08
to
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:52:22 -0600, High Plains Thumper wrote:

> Steve de Mena wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>
>>> Look on the positive. It keeps toner monkeys employed.
>>
>> What is a "toner monkey"? In the corporations I have worked
>> for users replaced toners themselves in the printers.
>
> Oh, I see, nice shot, "user".

You're sinking fast again HPT...
Time to thread slink.

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 2:54:45 AM9/19/08
to
Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>>> High Plains Thumper wrote: High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We don't know for sure and they refuse to tell. We do
>>>>> know that it wasn't a hardware/network issue (by
>>>>> "connectivity" they meant they could not reach LSE
>>>>> because it was down). Accenture worked closely with
>>>>> Microsoft on that one (offshore contract).
>>>>>
>>>>> Either way, Get the Facts is false advertising and
>>>>> someone should take that up with the ASA.
>>>>
>>>> Interesting how the astroturfers defend their precious
>>>> OS tooth and nail, it's the other guys fault, and spread
>>>> FUD that Linux is always not quite there, bid failure
>>>> on Linux part to win contract, ad nauseum.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I agree with you.
>>>
>>> Nobody here is defending Microsoft.
>>>
>>> We are simply saying that you loons have not proved that
>>> it is
>> ................................^^^^^
>>
>> Nice insult MoGo, only proves you're an idiot.
>
> Nice dodge... Like I said, despite all your chomping at the
> bit and frothing like a rabid dog in heat, you still have not
> proved Microsoft was behind the crash.

Interesting that this troll must resort to insults, gross
exaggerations and sexual references, can't simply participate in
the discussion like a normal human being.

> They very well might have been, but you haven't proved
> that.....

.... and can't substantiate any points as a part of normal
discussion, but must resort to libelous rants:

[quote]
From: "Moshe Goldfarb." <brick_...@gmail.com>
Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: [News] Hexen and Heretic Become Free Software (GNU GPL)
Message-ID: <ouzr484a2x4h$.yen6yofz...@40tude.net>
X-Trace: feeder.motzarella.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:57:18 +0000 (UTC)

[....] High Plains Thumper wrote:
> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
[....]
>> You need to read your Bible High Plains Thumper:
>>
>> Lev 18:22-23 "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with
>> a female; it is an abomination."
>>
>> Lev 20:13 "If there is a man who lies with a male as those
>> who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a
>> detestable act; they shall surely be put to death.
>>
>> I wonder how God would feel about Roy "Racine" Schestowitz.
>> Now *that* is bound to perplex even the almighty God!
>>
>> I'd lay in a large supply of asbestos underware if I were
>> you.....
>
> OTOH, this troll needs to read further for it states:
>
> Exodus 20:16 “You shall not give false testimony against your
> neighbor." - World English Bible (public domain)

You being gay is no surprise to anyone.
Not false in any way.
You had better check your posting history.
All of it..............

> Exodus 23:1 “You shall not spread a false report. Don’t join
> your hand with the wicked to be a malicious witness." - World
> English Bible (public domain)

[c.o.l.advocacy charter quote snipped]

Better talk to Schestowtiz....
[/quote]

Hadron

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 7:47:04 AM9/19/08
to
High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid> writes:

> Alan Baker wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> Err, what ran steady as a rock? The OLD SW? What SW are they
>>> NOW using? Last time I looked I never saw "MS Stock Exchange
>>> SW" in their catalog.
>>
>> Whatever they are using, it's not getting the job done. They
>> went from a single machine which never gave them problems to
>> 120 HP servers running Windows....
>>
>> ...and now they have crashes.
>
> Look on the positive. It keeps toner monkeys employed.

Say hi to Kelsey for us down in the stockroom.

--
"I do believe I have stated that he should be given the benefit of the
doubt, as is his right. If he did this crime, as it would seem, then he
should be punished as the law requires."
-- alt <spam...@lazyeyez.net> in alt.true-crime, comp.os.linux.advocacy

William Poaster

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 7:40:57 AM9/19/08
to
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:45:26 -0600, High Plains Thumper wrote:

> Alan Baker wrote:
>> "amicus_curious" wrote:
>>> "Alan Baker" wrote...
>>>
>>>> Ran solid as a rock for years pre-Microsoft.
>>>
>>> You don't know that. Else why would they be looking to change it?
>>
>> The article says as much. Try reading.
>
> Illiteracy seems to run high with our Wintrolls.

They appear to have a certain sort of "blindness" when it comes to reading
the truth about M$ in *the press*.

--
ɐ ɯoɹɟ ʇuǝs sɐʍ ǝƃɐssǝɯ sıɥʇ
pǝǝʇuɐɹɐnƃ sı ɥɔıɥʍ ɹǝʇndɯoɔ
˙snɹıʌ ǝzopuıʍ $ɯ ǝɥʇ ɟo ǝǝɹɟ %00⇂
-- sɯǝʇsʎs xnuıl/nuƃ --

amicus_curious

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 9:06:37 AM9/19/08
to

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-6CEBF...@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net...

> In article <48d254df$0$17668$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com>,
> "amicus_curious" <AC...@sti.net> wrote:
>
>> "Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
>> news:alangbaker-787F4...@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net...
>> > In article <rtWdnagr6KB0x0zV...@giganews.com>,
>> > Steve de Mena <st...@stevedemena.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>> >> > Microsoft crashes the London Stock Exchange... again.
>> >> >
>> >> > "It零 the third one in a year and worse even than last year零
>> >> > November
>> >> > 8th failure. "
>> >> >
>> >> > http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=1242&tag=nl.e539
>> >> >
>> >> > -RFH
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Maybe you can point to where in the article the cause of the outages
>> >> was determined to be Microsoft?
>> >>
>> >> Steve
>> >
>> > LOL
>> >
>> > Ran solid as a rock for years pre-Microsoft.
>> >
>> You don't know that. Else why would they be looking to change it?
>
> The article says as much. Try reading.
>
Try thinking a little. You are quick to take the opinion of a biased
blogger as gospel, but you are just being foolish and are a willing victim
of his bias.

The London Stock Exchange and HP are not the kind of clowns that they are
being made out to be by the empty Linux fans and other MS haters. But they
can keep talking. Talk is cheap and all that they can afford.

amicus_curious

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 9:07:43 AM9/19/08
to

"William Poaster" <w...@leafnode.amd64.eu> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.09.19....@leafnode.amd64.eu...

> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:45:26 -0600, High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> Alan Baker wrote:
>>> "amicus_curious" wrote:
>>>> "Alan Baker" wrote...
>>>>
>>>>> Ran solid as a rock for years pre-Microsoft.
>>>>
>>>> You don't know that. Else why would they be looking to change it?
>>>
>>> The article says as much. Try reading.
>>
>> Illiteracy seems to run high with our Wintrolls.
>
> They appear to have a certain sort of "blindness" when it comes to reading
> the truth about M$ in *the press*.
>
The press being in your little mind the same as anyone who opposes Microsoft
and writes a blog.

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 11:14:28 AM9/19/08
to

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 11:17:06 AM9/19/08
to

And not a single person has been able to substantiate their claims that
Microsoft software was the root cause of the problem.

Not one.

It may turn out that way but until it's been documented from a confirmed
source(s), the Linux loons are just frothing at the mouth and spreading
lies.

IOW typical day to day operations for them.

Chance Furlong

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 12:23:16 PM9/19/08
to
In article <lb6bocnaisr3$.kquianh5...@40tude.net>,
"Moshe Goldfarb." <brick....@gmail.com> wrote:

> It may turn out that way but until it's been documented from a confirmed
> source(s), the Linux loons are just frothing at the mouth and spreading
> lies.

Schmuck, why does Linux get your frilly panties in a bind?

Hadron

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 12:43:53 PM9/19/08
to
Chance Furlong <t-b...@megakatcity.com> writes:

Tattoo Vampire still fixated on Marti in his smalls again I see.

--
"Unfortunately, once again, the user-unfriendly dirtware sucks so bad it's
hard to prove how bad it sucks."
-- "DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> in comp.os.linux.advocacy

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 1:55:40 PM9/19/08
to
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:43:53 +0200, Hadron wrote:

> Chance Furlong <t-b...@megakatcity.com> writes:
>
>> In article <lb6bocnaisr3$.kquianh5...@40tude.net>,
>> "Moshe Goldfarb." <brick....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It may turn out that way but until it's been documented from a confirmed
>>> source(s), the Linux loons are just frothing at the mouth and spreading
>>> lies.
>>
>> Schmuck, why does Linux get your frilly panties in a bind?
>
> Tattoo Vampire still fixated on Marti in his smalls again I see.

So it appears....
I'll mark it off on my scorecard.

William Poaster

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 2:24:08 PM9/19/08
to
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:23:16 -0500, Chance Furlong wrote:

> In article <lb6bocnaisr3$.kquianh5...@40tude.net>,


> ." <brick....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It may turn out that way but until it's been documented from a confirmed
>> source(s), the Linux loons are just frothing at the mouth and spreading
>> lies.
>
> Schmuck, why does Linux get your frilly panties in a bind?

Because they *are* schmucks?

"The WSJ reports that yesterday's 7 hour outage at the LSE is due to a
proprietary platform based on Microsoft technologies.

At the heart of the problem appears to be super-fast technology that
has become critical to LSE and other exchanges. Traders experienced
problems connecting to TradElect, a 15-month-old proprietary LSE
platform developed with Microsoft Corp. technology that the LSE has
touted as allowing it to expand and speed up its capacity for trades.
"Microsoft is working with the London Stock Exchange to understand the
root cause of the outage," said a Microsoft spokesman.

OOPS!! it says **a Microsoft spokesman**

"Details are fuzzy, so maybe this is just a desktop as opposed to a core
trading system."

Is he suggesting that one M$ Windoze desktop can bring the whole system
down? If it's true, no wonder windows is regarded as a joke in *serious*
computing circles.

"As Julian Goldsmith reports, this month was also the deadline for
TradElect to reach 10,000 continuous messages per second. That's a pretty
significant number and I can't point to a Microsoft success story
processing that kind of volume."

So to date, M$ hasn't had any success with those kind of numbers... Well I
wonder who the bozo was that bought the system...& will he be in a job
next week.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13846_3-10036286-62.html

Now what was Moshe Flatfish Goldfarb saying about frothing?

Steve de Mena

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 2:51:57 PM9/19/08
to
William Poaster wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:23:16 -0500, Chance Furlong wrote:
>
>> In article <lb6bocnaisr3$.kquianh5...@40tude.net>,
>> ." <brick....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It may turn out that way but until it's been documented from a confirmed
>>> source(s), the Linux loons are just frothing at the mouth and spreading
>>> lies.
>> Schmuck, why does Linux get your frilly panties in a bind?
>
> Because they *are* schmucks?
>
> "The WSJ reports that yesterday's 7 hour outage at the LSE is due to a
> proprietary platform based on Microsoft technologies.
>
> At the heart of the problem appears to be super-fast technology that
> has become critical to LSE and other exchanges. Traders experienced
> problems connecting to TradElect, a 15-month-old proprietary LSE
> platform developed with Microsoft Corp. technology that the LSE has
> touted as allowing it to expand and speed up its capacity for trades.
> "Microsoft is working with the London Stock Exchange to understand the
> root cause of the outage," said a Microsoft spokesman.

"The LSE absolved its core TradElect platform from blame."

http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/it-business/it-organisation/news/index.cfm?newsid=10947

"London Stock Exchange confirms network software caused costly outage"

http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/infrastructure/networks/news/index.cfm?newsid=10912

Steve

Tim Smith

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 3:31:18 PM9/19/08
to
In article <1ak9d1qtulmvm$.19l2dh990fh1m$.d...@40tude.net>,

> >> Nice dodge... Like I said, despite all your chomping at the
> >> bit and frothing like a rabid dog in heat, you still have not
> >> proved Microsoft was behind the crash.
> >
> > Interesting that this troll must resort to insults, gross
> > exaggerations and sexual references, can't simply participate in
> > the discussion like a normal human being.
>
>
> Nice dodge... Like I said, despite all your chomping at the
> bit and frothing like a rabid dog in heat, you still have not
> proved Microsoft was behind the crash.

It's also interesting that HPT, who is refusing to answer you because
you have been insulting, has hurled numerous insults your way earlier in
the thread.


--
--Tim Smith

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 6:05:29 PM9/19/08
to

You noticed that huh?
So did I.......
The clue was that I was pretty decent with HPT yet he brought that part up.

He gets caught every single time.

Hadron

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 8:09:59 PM9/19/08
to
"Moshe Goldfarb." <brick....@gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:31:18 -0700, Tim Smith wrote:
>
>> In article <1ak9d1qtulmvm$.19l2dh990fh1m$.d...@40tude.net>,
>>>>> Nice dodge... Like I said, despite all your chomping at the
>>>>> bit and frothing like a rabid dog in heat, you still have not
>>>>> proved Microsoft was behind the crash.
>>>>
>>>> Interesting that this troll must resort to insults, gross
>>>> exaggerations and sexual references, can't simply participate in
>>>> the discussion like a normal human being.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nice dodge... Like I said, despite all your chomping at the
>>> bit and frothing like a rabid dog in heat, you still have not
>>> proved Microsoft was behind the crash.
>>
>> It's also interesting that HPT, who is refusing to answer you because
>> you have been insulting, has hurled numerous insults your way earlier in
>> the thread.
>
> You noticed that huh?
> So did I.......
> The clue was that I was pretty decent with HPT yet he brought that part up.
>
> He gets caught every single time.

Yup. Without a doubt the thickest poaster of the "advocates". Not as
*useless* as Willy but definitely dumber. He self nukes every time he
ventures into the deep end.

--
"At BT Global, our crown jewels are the services we supply to our
customers. With jNetX we own the intellectual property for our
services, allowing us to evolve the services as and when required."
Mark Kent,Head of Technology Strategy,COLA Hypocrite

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 10:35:43 AM9/20/08
to
Tim Smith wrote:
>
> It's also interesting that HPT, who is refusing to answer you
> because you have been insulting, has hurled numerous insults
> your way earlier in the thread.

Lie. Quoting the abuser's insults is not insult. Read your
dictionary.

--
HPT

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 10:45:29 AM9/20/08
to
William Poaster wrote:
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> Alan Baker wrote:
>>> "amicus_curious" wrote:
>>>> "Alan Baker" wrote...
>>>>
>>>>> Ran solid as a rock for years pre-Microsoft.
>>>>
>>>> You don't know that. Else why would they be looking to
>>>> change it?
>>>
>>> The article says as much. Try reading.
>>
>> Illiteracy seems to run high with our Wintrolls.
>
> They appear to have a certain sort of "blindness" when it
> comes to reading the truth about M$ in *the press*.

True, but remember, they have to justify their reasons for being
on the FUD Department's payroll.

They still can't explain why a Microsoft XP Professional desktop
on a corporate network will occasionally hose up after 4 days
from last boot for unknown reasons. User hits the reset switch,
reboot, then clears.

About a week ago, SMS server locked up for some unknown reason at
work. After reboot, it immediately started administering patches
to clients, contrary to schedule, affecting productivity during
working hours.

Yup, the blindness is inherent.

--
HPT

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 10:57:03 AM9/20/08
to
William Poaster wrote:
> Chance Furlong wrote:

>> Moshe Goldfarbe wrote:
>>
>>> It may turn out that way but until it's been documented
>>> from a confirmed source(s), the Linux loons are just
>>> frothing at the mouth and spreading lies.
>>
>> Schmuck, why does Linux get your frilly panties in a bind?

Because he has an eccentric crush on Roy.

http://tinyurl.com/5ckg78

http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2008/01/moshe-goldfarb-troll.html

Well, it's all a part of his ranting and raving per the Microsoft
Evangelism document:

'Use [...] the Internet, etc. to heighten the impression that the
enemy is desperate, demoralized, defeated, [...] associated with
mental deficiency, as in, "he believes in Santa Claus, the Easter
Bunny". Just keep rubbing it in, via the [...] newsgroups, [...]
make the complete failure of the competition's technology part of
the mythology of the computer industry.'

(reference PDF pages 45 & 55 on
http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/Comes-3096.pdf - Comes vs Microsoft
lawsuit )

The astroturfing by these few individuals and their sock puppets
are responsible for the dross we see in this newsgroup. Much of
it is done in a most perverted manner to do everything humanly
possible to silence Linux advocacy. The humiliating advocates by
accusing them of homosexual conduct, nymshifting, nymstealing,
usage of insulting terms such as "COLA nuts", "Linux loons", "you
work Windows during day and post Linux at night", "Linux/FOSS
slopware", distorting quotes, cross posting to unrelated forums
like "alt.kooks.net", bizarre sexual ones, and etc. are intended
for only one purpose, do discourage anyone who enjoys posting
about their Linux experiences and beliefs away from this forum.

--
HPT

Tim Smith

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 8:08:46 PM9/20/08
to
In article <48d50a3f$0$13386$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>,

See the following messages of yours:

<48d33b87$0$13387$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>

In that, you call Steve de Mena an "astroturfer". You are not quoting
any insult from him--you can't, since there are none.

<48d34cb6$0$13389$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>

There you call Moshe an idiot and imply he's not a normal human being.
Again, this is not a quote of something he said. It is something *you*
said.

<48d33d5c$0$13387$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>

Calling him an idiot. Not quoting any of his insults, but rather
originating your own.

--
--Tim Smith

Hadron

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 8:14:13 PM9/20/08
to
Tim Smith <reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> writes:

Proving High Plains Hypocrite is a liar and an arsehole is about as
difficult as demonstrating that gravity attracts things downwards....

--
"Vista actually requires more ram than a 32bit cpu can
address."
-- A Z Nomad in comp.os.linux.advocacy

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 12:09:19 PM9/21/08
to

HPT has issues.
It's obvious.

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 10:30:18 PM9/22/08
to
Tim Smith wrote:

> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> Tim Smith wrote:
>>
>>> It's also interesting that HPT, who is refusing to answer
>>> you because you have been insulting, has hurled numerous
>>> insults your way earlier in the thread.
>>
>> Lie. Quoting the abuser's insults is not insult. Read your
>> dictionary.

http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/01/tim-smith-troll.html

[quote] Name: Tim Smith

Traits:

* Microsoft apologist
* Funkenbusch wannabee - fails badly
* An incredible bore
* An incredible bore - oops I've said that already, no more to be
said [...]

Tim besides being a bore, follows suit as with other trolls and
does selective snippage to remove the context. His favourite
mantra is the COLA FAQ posted on

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/

is not the real FAQ, although it has followed the appropriate
public posting, protocol and approval during its development. He
does that to justify his off-topic posts.

Although he claims to provide advocacy, he readily sides with
trolls over advocates. [/quote]

> See the following messages of yours: [...]


>
> <48d34cb6$0$13389$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>
>
> There you call Moshe an idiot and imply he's not a normal
> human being. Again, this is not a quote of something he said.
> It is something *you* said.

Lie.

Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:54:45 -0600
From: High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: About that London Stock Exchange IT failure
Message-ID: <48d34cb6$0$13389$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>

[quote]


>>> We are simply saying that you loons have not proved that
>>> it is
>> ...............................^^^^^
>>
>> Nice insult MoGo, only proves you're an idiot.
>

> Nice dodge... Like I said, despite all your chomping at the
> bit and frothing like a rabid dog in heat, you still have not
> proved Microsoft was behind the crash.

Interesting that this troll must resort to insults, gross
exaggerations and sexual references, can't simply participate in
the discussion like a normal human being.

.... and can't substantiate any points as a part of normal


discussion, but must resort to libelous rants:

[quote]
From: "Moshe Goldfarb." <brick_...@gmail.com>
Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: [News] Hexen and Heretic Become Free Software (GNU GPL)
Message-ID: <ouzr484a2x4h$.yen6yofz...@40tude.net>
X-Trace: feeder.motzarella.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:57:18 +0000 (UTC)

You being gay is no surprise to anyone.


Not false in any way.
You had better check your posting history.
All of it..............

[c.o.l.advocacy charter quote snipped]

Better talk to Schestowtiz....
[/quote]

> <48d33d5c$0$13387$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>


>
> Calling him an idiot. Not quoting any of his insults, but
> rather originating your own.

Lie.

[quote]
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:49:14 -0600
From: High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: About that London Stock Exchange IT failure
Message-ID: <48d33d5c$0$13387$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>

Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> Yes, I agree with you.
>
> Nobody here is defending Microsoft.
>
> We are simply saying that you loons have not proved that it is
................................^^^^^

Nice insult MoGo, only proves you're an idiot.

[/quote]

Tim's rant is an example of:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/

[quote] 7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics [..]

45. Criticize Linux Advocates but ignore anti-Linux propagandist
transgressions. Always criticize the behavior of Linux
Advocates, but, ignore the same and even worse transgressions are
being committed by your fellow Trespassers.[/quote]

Tim Smith demonstrates his hypocrisy by allowing for use of the
term "loons". Tim Smith has only illustrated for the umpteenth
time that he is nothing but a liar.

--
HPT

Tim Smith

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 11:10:09 PM9/22/08
to
In article <48d854c5$0$13386$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>,

High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> > See the following messages of yours: [...]
> >
> > <48d34cb6$0$13389$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>
> >
> > There you call Moshe an idiot and imply he's not a normal
> > human being. Again, this is not a quote of something he said.
> > It is something *you* said.
>
> Lie.
>
> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:54:45 -0600
> From: High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
> Subject: Re: About that London Stock Exchange IT failure
> Message-ID: <48d34cb6$0$13389$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>
>
> [quote]
> >>> We are simply saying that you loons have not proved that
> >>> it is

That's Moshe. Not distinct lack of the word "idiot".

> >>
> >> Nice insult MoGo, only proves you're an idiot.

That's you. Not distinct presence of the word "idiot".

> > Nice dodge... Like I said, despite all your chomping at the
> > bit and frothing like a rabid dog in heat, you still have not
> > proved Microsoft was behind the crash.

That's Moshe.



> Interesting that this troll must resort to insults, gross
> exaggerations and sexual references, can't simply participate in
> the discussion like a normal human being.

And there you are again, applying an insult that is not a quote of a
Moshe insult.

...

> Tim Smith demonstrates his hypocrisy by allowing for use of the
> term "loons". Tim Smith has only illustrated for the umpteenth
> time that he is nothing but a liar.

Moshe is not claiming that he hasn't insulted anyone, so his use of
"loon" is irrelevant. It is *you* who are insulting people and then
claiming that you have not done so.

--
--Tim Smith

Hadron

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 11:14:25 PM9/22/08
to
High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid> writes:

> Tim Smith wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>> Tim Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's also interesting that HPT, who is refusing to answer
>>>> you because you have been insulting, has hurled numerous
>>>> insults your way earlier in the thread.
>>>
>>> Lie. Quoting the abuser's insults is not insult. Read your
>>> dictionary.
>
> http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/01/tim-smith-troll.html
>
> [quote] Name: Tim Smith
>
> Traits:
>
> * Microsoft apologist
> * Funkenbusch wannabee - fails badly
> * An incredible bore
> * An incredible bore - oops I've said that already, no more to be
> said [...]
>
> Tim besides being a bore, follows suit as with other trolls and
> does selective snippage to remove the context. His favourite

Anyone smell almost Liarmutt'esque levels of hypocrisy coming from
COLA's resident self acknowledged "thickest poaster" of all time?

Poor High Plains Hypocrite. Every time he poasts he gives himself
another dose of lice.

As Rick Pecker says : its time to shave your head and get you back on
the monkey bars!

Hadron

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 11:23:35 PM9/22/08
to
Tim Smith <reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> writes:

KABOOM

Another High Plains Hypocrite "self nuke". Could he get any more
ridiculous?

--
"Ignore the forging nym-shifting troll who pretends to be chrisv! I'm the *REAL* chrisv!"
chrisv, COLA.

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 9:34:43 AM9/23/08
to

Good detective work Tim.
The problem with HPT is that he is like a broken record.
He makes false claims over and over again hoping that because he tosses in
his idiotic site that somehow it will make it true and history will be
re-written.

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 9:35:50 AM9/23/08
to

The problem is, now we have to re-train High Plains Thumper on how to use
the monkey bars.

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 7:52:14 AM9/25/08
to

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 8:11:46 AM9/25/08
to
Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
> Tim Smith wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting that this troll must resort to insults, gross
>>> exaggerations and sexual references, can't simply
>>> participate in the discussion like a normal human being.
>>
>> And there you are again, applying an insult that is not a
>> quote of a Moshe insult.
>>
>>> Tim Smith demonstrates his hypocrisy by allowing for use
>>> of the term "loons". Tim Smith has only illustrated for
>>> the umpteenth time that he is nothing but a liar.
>>
>> Moshe is not claiming that he hasn't insulted anyone, so his
>> use of "loon" is irrelevant.

Ha!

http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=loon&gwp=13

[quote]
loon2 (lūn)
n. Informal.

One who is crazy or deranged.

[Probably from LOON1 (from its loud cry) and influenced by LUNATIC.]

Thesaurus: loon
noun

A person regarded as strange, eccentric, or crazy: crackpot,
crazy, eccentric, lunatic. Informal crank, loony. Slang cuckoo,
ding-a-ling, dingbat, kook, nut, screwball, weirdie, weirdo.
[/quote]

This is an example of:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/

[quote]
7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics [...]

17. Don't substantiate your claims. Refuse to present evidence
to support your invalid claims. Repeat your invalid claims and
have your anti-Linux propagandist comrades do the same. Do the
same for any invalid claims that you have notice your anti-Linux
propagandists comrades make.
[/quote]

>> It is *you* who are insulting people and then claming that


>> you have not done so.

Typical of Tim, goes off on tangents. Attacks advocates but
never criticises Moshe's homophobic, libelous rants.

This is an example of:

[quote]


45. Criticize Linux Advocates but ignore anti-Linux propagandist
transgressions. Always criticize the behavior of Linux
Advocates, but, ignore the same and even worse transgressions are
being committed by your fellow Trespassers.
[/quote]

> Good detective work Tim. The problem with HPT is that he is


> like a broken record. He makes false claims over and over
> again hoping that because he tosses in his idiotic site that
> somehow it will make it true and history will be re-written.

[quote]


From: "Moshe Goldfarb." <brick_...@gmail.com>
Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: [News] Hexen and Heretic Become Free Software (GNU GPL)
Message-ID: <ouzr484a2x4h$.yen6yofz...@40tude.net>
X-Trace: feeder.motzarella.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:57:18 +0000 (UTC)

You being gay is no surprise to anyone.
Not false in any way.
You had better check your posting history.
All of it..............

[c.o.l.advocacy charter quote snipped]

Better talk to Schestowtiz....
[/quote]

--
HPT

Tim Smith

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 12:54:12 PM9/25/08
to
In article <48db8006$0$17068$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>,

High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
> > Tim Smith wrote:
> >> High Plains Thumper wrote:
> >>
> >>> Interesting that this troll must resort to insults, gross
> >>> exaggerations and sexual references, can't simply
> >>> participate in the discussion like a normal human being.
> >>
> >> And there you are again, applying an insult that is not a
> >> quote of a Moshe insult.
> >>
> >>> Tim Smith demonstrates his hypocrisy by allowing for use
> >>> of the term "loons". Tim Smith has only illustrated for
> >>> the umpteenth time that he is nothing but a liar.
> >>
> >> Moshe is not claiming that he hasn't insulted anyone, so his
> >> use of "loon" is irrelevant.
>
> Ha!
>
> http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=loon&gwp=13
>
> [quote]

> loon2 (lŽąn)


> n. Informal.
>
> One who is crazy or deranged.
>
> [Probably from LOON1 (from its loud cry) and influenced by LUNATIC.]
>
> Thesaurus: loon
> noun
>
> A person regarded as strange, eccentric, or crazy: crackpot,
> crazy, eccentric, lunatic. Informal crank, loony. Slang cuckoo,
> ding-a-ling, dingbat, kook, nut, screwball, weirdie, weirdo.
> [/quote]

That's nice. Nice, but completely irrelevant, since *MOSHE* *HAS* *NOT*
*DENIED* *INSULTING* *ANYONE*.

You claimed that you had not insulted anyone--any insults in your posts
were in quotes from other people, not in the parts you wrote. That was
clearly incorrect of you, since I showed you three different posts of
yours where you had insulted Moshe.

Your claim is about *your* text, not anyone else's, so what is in the
posts you quote is totally irrelevant. You can keep bringing up Moshe's
text all you want, but it doesn't change the fact (amply proven by the
links posted previously) that you were out and out wrong in your claim.

--
--Tim Smith

Hadron

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 12:59:33 PM9/25/08
to
Tim Smith <reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> writes:

> In article <48db8006$0$17068$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>,
> High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>> > Tim Smith wrote:
>> >> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Interesting that this troll must resort to insults, gross
>> >>> exaggerations and sexual references, can't simply
>> >>> participate in the discussion like a normal human being.
>> >>
>> >> And there you are again, applying an insult that is not a
>> >> quote of a Moshe insult.
>> >>
>> >>> Tim Smith demonstrates his hypocrisy by allowing for use
>> >>> of the term "loons". Tim Smith has only illustrated for
>> >>> the umpteenth time that he is nothing but a liar.
>> >>
>> >> Moshe is not claiming that he hasn't insulted anyone, so his
>> >> use of "loon" is irrelevant.
>>
>> Ha!
>>
>> http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=loon&gwp=13
>>
>> [quote]

>> loon2 (l®±n)


>> n. Informal.
>>
>> One who is crazy or deranged.
>>
>> [Probably from LOON1 (from its loud cry) and influenced by LUNATIC.]
>>
>> Thesaurus: loon
>> noun
>>
>> A person regarded as strange, eccentric, or crazy: crackpot,
>> crazy, eccentric, lunatic. Informal crank, loony. Slang cuckoo,
>> ding-a-ling, dingbat, kook, nut, screwball, weirdie, weirdo.
>> [/quote]
>
> That's nice. Nice, but completely irrelevant, since *MOSHE* *HAS* *NOT*
> *DENIED* *INSULTING* *ANYONE*.
>
> You claimed that you had not insulted anyone--any insults in your posts
> were in quotes from other people, not in the parts you wrote. That was
> clearly incorrect of you, since I showed you three different posts of
> yours where you had insulted Moshe.
>
> Your claim is about *your* text, not anyone else's, so what is in the
> posts you quote is totally irrelevant. You can keep bringing up Moshe's
> text all you want, but it doesn't change the fact (amply proven by the
> links posted previously) that you were out and out wrong in your
> claim.

High Plains Hypocrite is a total retard and has proven time and time
again that is unable to post a single thought of his own which bares any
semblance to the truth. 99% of the time of course he just pastes in
other peoples words because "his brain dont work good like 7".

--
- "Just think, consumers are not sold on XP, and Microsoft shelled out
some major $$$ to develop this thing. This is a great opportunity for
alternative operating systems to intercept the ball, and run it back for a
touchdown.": comp.os.linux.advocacy - where they put the lunacy in advocacy

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 4:45:43 PM9/25/08
to
Hadron wrote:
> Tim Smith writes:

>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>>>> Tim Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Moshe is not claiming that he hasn't insulted anyone,
>>>>> so his use of "loon" is irrelevant.
>>>
>>> Ha!
>>>
>>> http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=loon&gwp=13
>>>
>>> [quote] loon2 (l®±n) n. Informal.
>>>
>>> One who is crazy or deranged.
>>>
>>> [Probably from LOON1 (from its loud cry) and influenced by
>>> LUNATIC.]
>>>
>>> Thesaurus: loon noun
>>>
>>> A person regarded as strange, eccentric, or crazy:
>>> crackpot, crazy, eccentric, lunatic. Informal crank,
>>> loony. Slang cuckoo, ding-a-ling, dingbat, kook, nut,
>>> screwball, weirdie, weirdo. [/quote]
>>
>> That's

<snip ridiculous jeer-leading rant>

> High Plains Hypocrite is a total retard and has proven time
> and time again that is unable to post a single thought of his
> own which bares any semblance to the truth. 99% of the time of
> course he just pastes in other peoples words because "his
> brain dont work good like 7".

So, now we have gone from protecting the guilty to tossing
insults, excellent, Timmy. Let us not forget the unwarranted:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/04a3d90e610f98df?

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: Tim Smith <reply_in_gr...@mouse-potato.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:14:46 GMT
Subject: Mark Kent, go fuck yourself

[quote]
--Tim Smith
[/quote]

Seems those whom reply in a manner Tim dislikes are called
"hypocrites":

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a08826ff4e2c8840?

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: Tim Smith <reply_in_gr...@mouse-potato.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 21:05:27 GMT
Subject: Mark Kent, go fuck yourself

[quote]
In article <cf0hk3-k96....@dog.did.it>, Roy Culley wrote:

> Poor Timmy. Time to grow up lad.

OK, now we've heard from Roy the Hypocrit...
[/quote]

Really sad that Tim has no respect for a person's dignity,
supports those who insult and even libel Linux advocates, then
attacks advocates.

--
HPT

Tim Smith

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 5:44:35 PM9/25/08
to
In article <48dbf87f$0$17069$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>,

High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>> Moshe is not claiming that he hasn't insulted anyone,
> >>>>> so his use of "loon" is irrelevant.
> >>>
> >>> Ha!
> >>>
> >>> http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=loon&gwp=13
> >>>
> >>> [quote] loon2 (l®±n) n. Informal.
> >>>
> >>> One who is crazy or deranged.
> >>>
> >>> [Probably from LOON1 (from its loud cry) and influenced by
> >>> LUNATIC.]
> >>>
> >>> Thesaurus: loon noun
> >>>
> >>> A person regarded as strange, eccentric, or crazy:
> >>> crackpot, crazy, eccentric, lunatic. Informal crank,
> >>> loony. Slang cuckoo, ding-a-ling, dingbat, kook, nut,
> >>> screwball, weirdie, weirdo. [/quote]
> >>
> >> That's
>
> <snip ridiculous jeer-leading rant>

This is what HPT is snipping:

-------------------------


That's nice. Nice, but completely irrelevant, since *MOSHE* *HAS* *NOT*
*DENIED* *INSULTING* *ANYONE*.

You claimed that you had not insulted anyone--any insults in your posts
were in quotes from other people, not in the parts you wrote. That was
clearly incorrect of you, since I showed you three different posts of
yours where you had insulted Moshe.

Your claim is about *your* text, not anyone else's, so what is in the
posts you quote is totally irrelevant. You can keep bringing up Moshe's
text all you want, but it doesn't change the fact (amply proven by the
links posted previously) that you were out and out wrong in your claim.

-------------------------

How is that a "rant"? Where are the jeers?

> So, now we have gone from protecting the guilty to tossing
> insults, excellent, Timmy. Let us not forget the unwarranted:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/04a3d90e610f98df?

Another irrelevancy, since I have not claimed that I don't insult people.

In message <48d50a3f$0$13386$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>, you claimed that
you were not insulting people in this thread, only quoting other insults.

Yet in <48d33d5c$0$13387$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>, you write:

"Nice insult MoGo, only proves you're an idiot."

That's not you quoting someone. That's something you *wrote*.

You lied. You were caught. It doesn't matter how many irrelevant
things you dig up about me, or Hadron, or anyone else--even if you prove
that I'm the Antichrist, Hadron is the Chairman of the Bilderberg Group,
and Moshe is the secret majority shareholder of Microsoft, it doesn't
change the *fact* that you lied about insulting people, and were caught.

You can run all you want, but nothing can change that fact.

--
--Tim Smith

Hadron

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 5:53:42 PM9/25/08
to
Tim Smith <reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> writes:

> In article <48dbf87f$0$17069$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>,
> High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>>> Moshe is not claiming that he hasn't insulted anyone,
>> >>>>> so his use of "loon" is irrelevant.
>> >>>
>> >>> Ha!
>> >>>
>> >>> http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=loon&gwp=13
>> >>>

>> >>> [quote] loon2 (l®±n) n. Informal.

High Plains Hypocrite, like "Owl", will try to bury his incompetence in
a mountain of snips and history re-writes.

It's laughable to the extreme.

--
"By your and your buddies references, marketshare.hitslink.com, it has
moved from .43 to .68 over the last year. Increasing by 58% over the last
year doesn't seem to me like it hasn't changed much in 16 years."
-- Rick <no...@nomail.com> in comp.os.linux.advocacy

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 6:57:04 PM9/25/08
to
Tim Smith wrote:
> In article <48dbf87f$0$17069$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>, High
> Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> Yet in <48d33d5c$0$13387$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>, you write:
>
> "Nice insult MoGo, only proves you're an idiot."
>
> That's not you quoting someone. That's something you *wrote*.
>
> You [snip little troll's rant]

Put hand under arm, squeeze, "pbbfffftt", "pbbfffftt",
"pbbfffftt". That is about as much sense as this troll's rant makes.

Half truth is as bad as no truth:

[quote]
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:49:14 -0600


From: High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: About that London Stock Exchange IT failure

Message-ID: <48d33d5c$0$13387$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>

Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>

>> Yes, I agree with you.
>
> Nobody here is defending Microsoft.
>

> We are simply saying that you loons have not proved that it is

................................^^^^^

Nice insult MoGo, only proves you're an idiot.

[/quote]

Tim's rant is an example of:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/

[quote] 7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics [..]

45. Criticize Linux Advocates but ignore anti-Linux propagandist
transgressions. Always criticize the behavior of Linux
Advocates, but, ignore the same and even worse transgressions are
being committed by your fellow Trespassers.[/quote]

Tim Smith demonstrates his hypocrisy by allowing for use of the


term "loons". Tim Smith has only illustrated for the umpteenth
time that he is nothing but a liar.

Here's a fitting end to this argument. <Plinque!>

--
HPT

Tim Smith

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 7:40:38 PM9/25/08
to
In article <48dc1742$0$17066$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>,

High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Half truth is as bad as no truth:
>
> [quote]
> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:49:14 -0600
> From: High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
> Subject: Re: About that London Stock Exchange IT failure
> Message-ID: <48d33d5c$0$13387$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>
>
> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
> > High Plains Thumper wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, I agree with you.
> >
> > Nobody here is defending Microsoft.
> >
> > We are simply saying that you loons have not proved that it is
> ................................^^^^^
>
> Nice insult MoGo, only proves you're an idiot.
> [/quote]

What half truth? You insulted Moshe, and then claimed you do not insult
people. You yourself are quoting your post above that shows you
insulting Moshe.

You keep highlighting that Moshe called some people loons. For the Nth
time, that's completely irrelevant, since no one claimed that Moshe was
not insulting people. You claimed that *you* do not insult people, but
right there in your very own quote, you show yourself insulting someone.

You can't run away from your own posting history when you yourself keep
quoting it!

--
--Tim Smith

Tim Smith

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 7:41:33 PM9/25/08
to
In article <gbh180$6me$1...@registered.motzarella.org>,

Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> High Plains Hypocrite, like "Owl", will try to bury his incompetence in
> a mountain of snips and history re-writes.
>
> It's laughable to the extreme.

Well, on the plus side, he's at least stuck to just one nym in this
thread.


--
--Tim Smith

Hadron

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 7:49:20 PM9/25/08
to
Tim Smith <reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> writes:

Are you sure?

<quote>
Timmy is a wintroll
</quote>

Bwahahahahha!

Damn. I dont even trust myself now. Maybe I am High Plains Hypocrite?

Aaargh ....................

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 11:04:15 PM9/25/08
to

Of course he was wrong.
He sounds like a broken record.

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 11:05:04 PM9/25/08
to

As usual, facts seem to make the Linux *advocates* twitch and jerk.

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 11:05:52 PM9/25/08
to
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:53:42 +0200, Hadron wrote:

> Tim Smith <reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> writes:
>
>> In article <48dbf87f$0$17069$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org>,
>> High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> >>>>> Moshe is not claiming that he hasn't insulted anyone,
>>> >>>>> so his use of "loon" is irrelevant.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Ha!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=loon&gwp=13
>>> >>>

>>> >>> [quote] loon2 (l®±n) n. Informal.

LiarMutt is using the same tactic.
They all hope the Linux Mafia will come along and "me too" the posts.
And they usually do.
That however does not change the facts.

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 11:06:09 PM9/25/08
to

Haah...

Moshe Goldfarb.

unread,
Sep 25, 2008, 11:07:22 PM9/25/08
to

I love the way he is just seeding Google over and over again with his
garbage.
He is in effect shooting himself in the foot.

0 new messages