Thomas B. Edsall

BIO

Thomas B. Edsall

The Huffington Post

Big Rewards Await Clinton If She Ends Campaign Now

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

May 7, 2008 05:49 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

About Thomas B. Edsall

Thomas B. Edsall is the political editor of the Huffington Post. He is also Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Professor at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism. From 1981 to 2006, he was a political reporter at the Washington Post. He is the author of Chain Reaction and Building Red America. Tom can be reached at edsall@huffingtonpost.com.


She has ruled it out, but a prompt withdrawal from the contest for the Democratic nomination offers Sen. Hillary Clinton the prospect of major rewards.

One of the most inviting is the near certainty that the Obama campaign would agree to pay back the $11.4 million she has loaned her own bid, along with an estimated $10 million to $15 million in unpaid campaign expenses.

In addition, Democrats, both those who are loyal and those who are opposed to her campaign, say the odds of her winning a top leadership spot in the Senate would improve dramatically if she gracefully conceded now. The icing on the cake includes an improved political climate, giving Hillary and Bill Clinton the opportunity to heal the rift with the black political community.

"If she leaves the stage gracefully, as Gore did in 2000, she will be able to rebuild her political capital within the party fairly quickly, and over time most of her perceived and real sins will be long forgiven and/or forgotten," said Dan Gerstein, a Democratic consultant and Obama supporter.

While Clinton currently has her eye focused on only one thing, the presidential nomination, if she loses -- as appears increasingly likely -- her stature in the Senate will depend, in part, on whether she is ultimately seen as helping or hurting Obama's chances in November.

That stature, in turn, will be crucial in determining her success if she decides to try to climb the Senate leadership ladder. This year, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada faces what could prove to be a tough re-election fight.

Brookings scholar Tom Mann contends that for Clinton to emerge from the contest without severe wounds, one path might be to redirect the main thrust of her presidential bid away from attacks on Obama to a focus on John McCain.

"Clinton's status in the Democratic party will be enhanced if she finds a timely and honorable way to become a strong supporter of an Obama-led ticket in the general election. She can do that by remaining in the race but directing all of her campaign rhetoric against John McCain or by suspending her campaign immediately."

At the moment, Clinton shows no signs of quitting. In West Virginia Wednesday morning, she told reporters: "I'm staying in this race until there's a nominee. And I obviously am going to work as hard as I can to become that nominee....I believe I would be a stronger candidate against Sen McCain, and I believe I would be the best President among the three of us running."

In a Wednesday afternoon fundraising email, Clinton declared, "Today, in every way that I know how, I am expressing my personal determination to keep forging forward in this campaign."

On the money front, it is not uncommon for winning presidential campaigns to pick up some or all of a competitor's debts and obligations, although the size of Clinton's debt and her personal loans to her campaign are unprecedented - somewhere over and above $20 million.

The Clintons have made a total of $109 million since Bill Clinton left the White House in January 2001. This year, however, he has had to cut back on his hugely lucrative speech-making, and sources close to the Clintons say they are not in a financial position to keep investing millions into her bid.

While both Obama and Clinton have broken all Democratic fundraising records, once one of them become the de facto nominee, the floodgates are expected to open even further, as Democratic donors this year are intent on victory.

In addition to an expected tidal wave of cash to the nominee to finance the general election campaign, the Democratic National Committee, which has been struggling financially, will undoubtedly see a repeat of 2004, when it raised an unprecedented $300 million after John Kerry became the undisputed nominee.

 
 

Comments
1367
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (19 pages total)

I don't want my Obama money going into her PERSONAL bank account!!! Let him pay the rest if that is common practice but that is all. She risked her money. That was her choice. Ooops... Obama needs everything he can get to win in Nov.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 PM on 05/11/2008

Obama & His Campaign Would Like An Early Clocse To This historic Primary ¦. They What Us To Beleive They Have Won ¦.. Truth Is They Haven't ¦ Hillary Has The Edge Now , And can Win The Primary !!

If these so called party leaders think that us Hillary supporters are just going to fall in line behind their flawed choice, then they'd better think again. It's not going to happen. Obama and his supporters are going to discover that many of her voters feel that she was betrayed by her own party, so why should we support a party who did not support our choice for the President. I have accepted that McCain will be the next president but only for one term and then Hillary can run again with the "I told you so" campaign.

HIllary 08² or Hillary 12²

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 05/11/2008

Why is it so URGENT for her to quit? Why is everyone "afraid" she will hurt Obama's chances in the general? Do you all think McCain is even a little bit warmed up in his attacks...he's just been hitting things as they come up...there has been no concerted effort by repubs to attack Obama. It will make you all wish for the good old days when it was Just Hillary saying he isn't ready....he will lose. He nearly did over Wright, and Hillary barely said anything at all about it, only answered direct questions.
My question is and will be : If he is so vulnerable to what Hillary might say and she's a dem, what in the world do you think it will be like when the republicans open up on Barry? It will be a blood bath, and they won't care if Obama uses his "secret weapon" calling them racists....they won't care. It hurt the Clinton's that a fellow dem would ever even hint that they are racist, Obama used it to try to litterally destroy them...shameful. But that tactic that he always uses will not work on the republicans, it's obvious they don't care what the world thinks of what they do, they just do what they want, and rewrite it later to make them look good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 05/11/2008

As for you black women who are willing to label Senator Obama as a sexist, I say this, you have yet to acknowledge the value and worth of our beautiful black brothers. Do not displace your hostilities onto this man because of the sentiments and stereotypical behaviors of your fathers/husbands/significant others. I guess it's hard for some of you to recognize something you've never seen before, a good Black Man.

Obama/Americans '08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 05/11/2008

Why does she need rewards for her behavior. She needs to just drop out and her and Bill should just go back to New York.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 05/11/2008

Abomination of the Obamination based on discrimination is a loathsome contamination. Fulmination from examination should be based on incrimination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 AM on 05/11/2008

I saw a funny site urging Hillary to drop out:

http://www.SurrenderHillary.com/gallery

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 AM on 05/11/2008

I would like to know what the hell Dan Gerstein is talking about when he says Clinton's real sins will be forgiven or forgotton if she concedes. I swear I have seen the worst display of sexism in this country in the past few months than I have ever seen in my entire life. When Huckabee would not concede so they could give the nomination to John McCain it was just fine and dandy with everyone. But Senator Clinton they want to damn her to hell and spew hatred at her for not conceding. IT IS CALLED SEXISM!!!! And Obama was the first one to make the first sexist and negative comment months ago when he said referring to Senator Clinton "Well, I guess she is likeable enough. Women you need to take a stand and start letting your voices be heard accross this nation !!! STOP THE SEXISM IN AMERICA !!!!!!! I would bet every dime that I had that if Senator Clinton were a man that these same people who are saying that Obama should not pick her as his VEEP would be coming out saying that he would be a fool if he didn't !!!! Continue the fight that your grandmothers and great grandmothers fought so hard for!!!! Do it for yourself, daughters and your granddaughters. Make picket signs and go to your state capitols and let your voices be heard accross this nation !!!! STOP THE SEXISM IN AMERICA !!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 05/10/2008

Keep repeating the lie to make it true. Most of us aren't buying it and as Hillary admits, the rest aren't that smart.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 05/11/2008

I admit that I am a Political News Junkie, and I have searched archives looking for any statement out of Senator Obama's mouth that I could interpret (or misinterpret) as sexist, I COULDN'T FIND ANY. I did however find these offensive events/statements:

Hillary Clinton crying...Bill C.,"They're picking on the girl"...."I feel like Goldilocks"..."I would have left" (oh really, miss independent, after affair number?)...."This is not what I expect from you Barrack" (is Senator Obama Hillary's Black Love Child?)..."I will make history as the first woman POTUS"..." Blah, Blah, Blah.......

So, "Gizmo1125" since you know of these sexist statements by Senator Obama, POST THEM! There is nothing worse than a woman who fabricates misdeeds by a man. You and Hillary "Obliterate" every achievement made by women over the last century, when you starting whining about how unfair you're being treated. Neither of you are feminists, and I have nothing in common with women who cry foul, and then expect the rest of us to fall in line because you're a woman. That's Bullshit! You really want respect, try being a real woman, and don't just say you want to be treated equal, mean it. Remember way, way back when Senator Clinton was winning, she said, "They're not coming after me because I'm a woman, they're coming after me because I'm winning". Nothing has changed about her coverage, except, of course, her perception of winning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 05/11/2008

how about when she was Pauline Revere? MRS Clinton is too mediocre to be president and stating that others have been below average is not going to help us now. The first woman president has to be exceptional as does the first anything or people who follow them are suspect just because of their gender, race, religion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 05/11/2008

I've asked this same question more than once. No response, so far. Doubt if you'll get one either. Think the "sexist" charge was one first made by Bill Clinton -- again, with no evidence. What this represents appears to be people just making stuff up as they go along.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 05/11/2008

SamThornton: Just like their favorite candidate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 05/11/2008

What a fool! White women have not been maligned for hundreds of years. Or lynched or burned, or raped and on and on. Clinton is not being challenged because she is a woman but because of her tactics. She doesn't care about black people, Americans, or the Democratic Party for that matter-she only cares for Hillary Clinton.

It's apparent that most people care about Hillary Clinton becasue they do not hold her feet to the fire like they do Obama. What about all the negatives that are not discussed ad infinitum? That of the Peter Paul case comes to mine. And how long did we discuss sniper fire and NAFTA?

That Barack Obama would think about helping her with her debt when she is still pouring fuel on the fire of disunity is laughable (strike that) sickening. After all we've been through? I know Obama has to walk a fine line here but he's got to show some back bone and disgust with the underhanded tactics that the Clintons are using.

One other thing: After reading the Washington Post yesterday, I discovered that the journalist, BARBARA REYNOLDS, arranged the Nat'l Press Club fiasco with Jeremiah Wright. Here's a supposedly intelligent black woman who must be developing some kind of mental instability. AND SHE HAD THE NERVE TO STATE IN THE PAPER THAT SHE HAD NOT DECIDED WHOM SHE WAS GOING TO VOTE FOR. Both she and Hillary must be drinking the same kool aid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 AM on 05/11/2008

Sexism in America is a real issue, but you are flat wrong if you think the bad press for Senator Clinton is because she's a woman. I was a strong Hillary supporter at first, and then I realized I was only supporting her because she is a woman. That's not a good enough reason to vote for someone. Hillary is a divisive, negative, old school politician who cares only for herself, and it appears has lost all desire to preserve the Clinton name. Clinton has conducted herself in a desperate, ANTI-FEMINIST manner. She has employed the very same tactics used to keep women in this country from rising in the first place--by making sweeping generalizations about entire racial or class groups in this country. SHE IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. OPEN YOUR EYES WOMEN!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 AM on 05/11/2008

I don't consider myself the type of feminist that gets pissed off when a man opens the door for me, but as a woman; I refuse to let the media or republicans choose my candidate. The type of blatant sexism that I witnessed during this campaign and double standards are not the kinds of things that I can stand for on principle. I found a qualified and strong leader in Hillary Clinton and I watched and read posts that diminished her in every way. From the "She's a senator because her husband cheated on her," to the "Bitch that castrates women" comments or the she-devil character. If the sign in NH read "Barack shine my shoes," instead of "Hillary, Iron my shirt," would you then decide to be offended? As a 31 year old black woman, I also refuse to tolerate the constant charge of racism every time Senator Obama is criticized. It's more acceptable to be sexist than it is to be racist in this country and this election proved it. I cannot respect that kind of a win.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 AM on 05/11/2008


Cont'd...

I was more than willing in the beginning to vote for whomever, even though I felt that Senator Obama was not the strongest candidate, but now I don't even feel obligated to reward him. Please don"t claim that he"s above it all. I heard him say that his supporters would not support her. I heard him say that her LBJ comment was an "unfortunate comment," instead of telling the truth that it wasn"t a racial comment. I saw the email that his campaign was sending around in SC that listed all of the Clinton"s "racial" tactics. I saw the negative pamphlet authorized by his campaign in IN. Bribing me or scaring me into the possibility of overturning roe v. wade isn't going to work either. That issue will never affect my life, so it's not my priority. I've always stood up for what I believe in and this is one of those times. He has a more than enough of a coalition to elect him, but it won't be with my vote. My eyes are wide open and the Democratic Party will not slap me in the face and tell me that they"re shaking my hands. I left the party because of the sexism and I"ll more than likely write her name in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 AM on 05/11/2008

Go for it "MA4HRC" ! No Black man needs a Black woman like you in his corner. When you can praise yourself, the way you praise an unworthy Presidential candidate, then call yourself a woman, and trust me, you are no feminist. True feminists don't have to trash men to feel powerful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 05/11/2008

It is kind of sad. Sen. Obama has never said anything that one could even draw inference as a sexist remark. There were sexist and racist remarks flying about the MSM but that is hardly the fault of Sen. Obama. He did not say them, condone them, or repeat them. Can you say the same about Sen. Clinton?

Her LBJ comment was unfortunate. Truth is LBJ jumped on the civil rights bandwagon at the last moment and only when he was finally convinced of the political power of the movement. He didn't champion the cause. He was never on the picket line. He signed a piece of paper that was advantageous to him. He expended political capital to gain a beneficial legacy.

To say he played a part equal to Dr. King is either dishonest or ignorant. Take your pick.

Pointing out racial tactics that were actually used is different than trying to use former associates and neighbors as a means of attacking a candidate.

It is unfortunate that supporters of both parties are not free of bigotry. It is unfortunate that America is still wrapped up in divisiveness. It is unfortunate that Sen. Clinton is still making racial charged statements.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 AM on 05/11/2008

Finally another person willing to tell the truth!! How refreshing. It's a shame not many will believe you as the MSM seemed to overlook the activities of Sen. Obama's campaign and focused solely on running Sen. Clinton into the ground.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 AM on 05/11/2008

Too bad for the Clintons that everything can not be bought with money. Wonder what she'll do with the money that she tried to buy the Super Dees with when they told her the only way they'd accept that money is if she drops out of the race? HILLLARIOUS!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 05/10/2008

So was it okay for Senator Obama ot pay over 800K to superdelegates?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 AM on 05/11/2008

Oh, you didn't hear, when Sen. Obama does it it's for hope and change. But when Sen. Clinton does it it is because she a liar, a cheat and a con artist.

hypocrisy is alive and well in the Obama camp. Change? Sure looks like politics as usual to me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 AM on 05/11/2008

.What we need is an antidote, a real Teddy Roosevelt to the Boss Tweed types. Go Hiliary

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 05/10/2008

What exactly does Hillary have to do with a "Boss Tweed Antidote"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:43 AM on 05/11/2008

This seems to be the Democratic Party"s standard answer to those who stand in there way. Bribe them. It worked for Mayor Daily the elder and Boss Tweed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 05/10/2008

And it's worth it to get rid of her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 05/10/2008

Why the reticence on the part of the Obama Campaign? The Obama web page disclaimer does't quite cut the mustard suggesting it's not a rumor but fact.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 05/10/2008

Note how Edsall used this original lie to launch this whole non-story he's now flogging:

"One of the most inviting is the near certainty that the Obama campaign would agree to pay back the $11.4 million she has loaned her own bid, along with an estimated $10 million to $15 million in unpaid campaign expenses."

We all know from subsequent posts that Edsall knew this was a lie when he wrote it. So what's he up to? What's his agenda?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 05/10/2008

bobdob...YOU GOT IT TOTALLY CORRECT......And, knowing blacks as well as I do via working for them for many years and how they work their influences, power-bases and inner circles, I'd venture a guess he's trying to "do" an old-fashion nudge job on Obama, to get him into thinking he (Edsell) knows (the white-system better) hence what "it" would take to sew up the nomination -right now! Believe it or not, Edsell, is one of those whites (just like the Bonnie and Clyde Clintons that still think they can lay a guilt trip on the brown guy and he will just "fold." Problem with that old foolish approach is, it's 2008, and it really is a new day and a new deal. So, when they lose that, "....fetch it, boy" attitude and mind-set, then we all can move forward with hope in our hearts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 05/10/2008

It's rather curious - and - I believe you are completely correct. The opinion in this piece is not substantiated by anything but gossip. To propose that Obama is willing to engage in sending his own supporters screaming in disbelief - is counterproductive.

However, if one were to suggest that Hillary Clinton's campaign is essentially blackmailing the DNC into making her debt-free (within the rules) - I have no doubt. This is the politics that they were weaned on, this is the politics that dominated the Clinton White House (sadly for the Clintons and the country) and this is the politics that 'they' know best. That's how a Ohioan, Pennsylvanian, Arkansan, Chicagoan - gets to be elected a Senator from NY. A State, that from any sensible examination, was never her home. She threw in with the dinosaurs of the Demcratic party and the rest is history.

Clinton is the head of her campaign - she's the commander-in-chief. If that in itself is a test of leadership - she's not done well at all.

This article spoke of a sort of pay-off that is a fairy tale inspired by the party dinosaurs. A version may come to pass, but it certainly seems as though Hillary is always saying one thing and doing another. Respectfully, as an opinion piece, this article seems more like a letter to Santa.

Respectfully,

Binx101
The Almost Daily Binx
http://binx101.wordpress.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 05/10/2008

If Senator Obama assist in paying of any of Hillary's debts, I will request my contribution to his campaign back.
It is Hillary who cannot manage her campaign and spent recklessly over the course of a year. I did not contribute to Obama so that he can pay for Hillary's misgivings.
Just in case this report is accurate, I will not make another contribution until Senator Obama says this is not true. The Clinton's did this to themselves and I will not have my funds pay for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 05/10/2008

I totally wholeheartedly agree.

No Bailout!!!

She has $109 frikken million! She can spend every last dollar of it for all I care.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 05/10/2008

Ok, for those political know it alls who apparently only read the headlines and not the stories themselves Sen. Obama can NOT pay off Sen. Clinton's campaign directly. It has been stated ad nauseum on this blog. I really don't know what is so hard to comprehend about that yet it seems to be very difficult for many of you to comprehend.
I know it is going to come as a shock to most of you, but Sen. Obama will do what needs to be done without consulting you. Like it or not but the DNC and Sen. Obama are going to protect Sen. Clinton in the end. They are going to make sure her debts are taken care of and she is ok going into her next election. Why? Because you protect your own in the party, PERIOD! I am certain being a former DEC member that Sen. Obama's campaign is fully aware of what Sen. Clinton is doing. Have you heard Sen. Obama come out directly and tell her to drop out? NO. Why because there are other things in play here.

She ran her campaign like it or not against a person you supported and you didn't like it. Well too bad, grow up that's politics. Let the campaigns do what needs to be done for the party and be quiet about it. The only ones ruining the party and creating more friction is the supporters of both campaigns and the MSM is playing off of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 AM on 05/10/2008

"If she leaves the stage gracefully"
That is her problem she has no clue what grace is lately!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 AM on 05/10/2008

Who's telling the truth about this situation? Olberman last night stated Obama's camp has stated they are willing to pay her debts. What the hell is going on? If Obama's people are lying to donors and telling us they are not going to do this and then going to clinton's camp and offering a payoff, they are going to have hell to pay! They're not getting another penny from me as long as this back and forth is going on. Olberman had to have heard this from someone in Obama's camp. I don't think he just made it up. If Obama really isn't going to do this, for the sake of his campaign he'd better make a public statement soon to confirm. I doubt many of the folks supporting his campaign have the luxury of possessing 109 million dollars. She doesn't need middle class Americans going without in order for her to maintain her extreme wealth. Isn't that what she always stating?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 AM on 05/10/2008

Another bogus story about this. Talk about blackmailing someone. If Obama is the presumptive nominee, why are all his supporters so desperate to get rid of Hillary before June 3rd.

Why not let the rest of the states vote? Oh, right because that would a democracy and Obama may look a little foolish when he loses a couple more important states. I guess that's why.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 AM on 05/10/2008
<