Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Foreign Policy Doctrine Echoing Reagan’s
Jews for Sarah.com ^ | 3/23/11 | Benyamin Korn

Posted on 03/23/2011 9:07:52 AM PDT by unseen1

A Republican former governor, solidly pro-Israel, is running for the White House, but mocked by the pundits for allegedly lacking foreign policy expertise – yet ends up time and again being proved right on the major international issues of the day. Thinking Ronald Reagan?

Try Sarah Palin.

Nearly one month ago, the incumbent GOP vice presidential candidate became the first major American political figure to call for imposing a no-fly zone over Libya. Finally, in the past week, Palin’s idea was adopted by – in quick succession – the Arab League, the UN Security Council, and President Obama. Finally this week allied ordnance began striking Moammar Qaddhafi’s forces. Let’s hope it’s not too late.

Libya is just the latest major foreign policy challenge where Gov. Palin has confounded her detractors and demonstrated that, just as with Reagan, good instincts and a sound worldview are what count when a leader’s telephone rings at 3:00 a.m.

We call it the Palin Doctrine. It’s based on the principles that allies should be supported, dictators reviled, terrorists hunted down and enemies defeated. It also means the western world will not stand by at the bloody repression of a democratic revolution.

These notions might be self-evident to some, but they’re not to President Obama, who cannot bring himself even to utter the words “Islamist” and “terrorist” in the same sentence. One of his top intelligence officials actually told Congress last month that the Muslim Brotherhood is a “largely secular” organization. Ms. Palin, by contrast, denounced as a “shame” the administration’s offer to the Brotherhood of a seat at the table of power in Egypt’s newly evolving system.

Last week Governor and Mr. Palin were in New Delhi where she delivered the keynote address at a high-level political conclave. As the first visit to south Asia by a potential 2012 GOP contender, her attention was welcomed in a democracy justifiably concerned about the unstable behavior of Pakistan, its nuclear-armed neighbor to the northwest, and a China rapidly arming, under a regime where state capitalism and rigid control of political power go hand-in-hand.

The Palins’ stopover in Israel likewise came at a critical moment. In the wake of the Itamar massacre and the renewed rocket attacks on Israel from Gaza, Gov. Palin expressed only solidarity, even wearing a Star of David during her tours. She promised to return soon for a longer visit.

Contrast that with the behavior of Mr. Obama, who has yet, as President, even to visit the Jewish state, pays only lip service to the threat of ceaseless Palestinian incitement, and has returned to carping about the “illegitimacy” of Jews building houses where they already live.

Most important for the long term, Mrs. Palin has extensive experience administering energy policy, and proven success in tough negotiations with the giant energy firms, and the former Alaska governor always links U.S. security interests with “responsible development” of America’s abundant fuel resources.

The president’s most effective critic recently declared that his “war on domestic oil and gas exploration and production has caused us pain at the pump, endangered our already sluggish economic recovery, and threatened our national security.” In her India address Mrs. Palin chastised the White House aversion to energy development as a form of “social engineering.”

Jimmy Carter’s foreign policy was marked by indecision, weakness, and a the abandonment of long-standing U.S. Allies. The resolute Reagan Doctrine of peace through strength restored America’s standing in the world and brought down the Soviet empire without firing a shot. Barack Obama’s foreign policy is looking more like Carter’s every day. And Sarah Palin’s looks more and more like Reagan’s.


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: elections; foreignpolicy; israel; obama; palin; palindoctrine; reagan; sarahpalin
thoughts?
1 posted on 03/23/2011 9:08:00 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: unseen1
I think Palin will run largely against the media, and will do very well. No one trusts the media anymore. Secondarily, she will run against Obama. That will be easy, since all she has to do is say the basic stuff the media has not said. The sheeple will be amazed.

I think her chances of winning are excellent -- unless the GOP establishment tries to give Obama a second term. Which wouldn't surprise me.

2 posted on 03/23/2011 9:12:05 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
nor would it surprise me. In fact since Nov the gop establishment has been doing everything in their power to make it so.
3 posted on 03/23/2011 9:14:14 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: unseen1

The no fly zone is absurd and not a great example of Palin judgment.

The best foreign policy move by far is to offer both sides in Libya just enough beans and bullets to keep gunning each other down... Forever if possible. Never let either side win, just keep the slaughter going. Hell, it’s the Muslim way.


4 posted on 03/23/2011 9:32:16 AM PDT by DariusBane (People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

yeah it’s never a good idea to hunt down and kill a murderer of Americans for the last 30 years when we have the chance. /s


5 posted on 03/23/2011 9:44:55 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: unseen1

“yeah it’s never a good idea to hunt down and kill a murderer of Americans for the last 30 years when we have the chance. /s”

Really? Who takes over the power vacuum? Al Qaeda? That’s fine because we now they have never ever murdered Americans./s

We have a precedent for this BTW. Iran/Iraq war. We kept both sides functional and shooting. Worked great until the war, sadly, as all wars must, stopped.


6 posted on 03/23/2011 10:00:23 AM PDT by DariusBane (People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

hmmm you might have missed the fact that Saddam invaded Kuwait and Arabia after the Iran/Iraq war requiring us to go in and fight two major wars in that area. Both countries Iran/Iraq came out stronger from that war not weaker. Iran is one of the strongest powers in the ME thanks to the Iran/Iraq war. As far as who fills in the power vaccuum. If we aren’t around we have no ability to determine that.


7 posted on 03/23/2011 10:13:43 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: onyx; 2ndDivisionVet; Virginia Ridgerunner

((Interest Ping))


8 posted on 03/23/2011 10:40:45 AM PDT by misharu (I am an Independent Conservative who caucuses with the Republicans (for now).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unseen1

Missing? No. That was over a decade later. Our mistake was letting that war end. We should have had them at each others throats again.


9 posted on 03/23/2011 11:41:26 AM PDT by DariusBane (People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane
the Iran/Iraq war ended in 1988, Sadamm invaded Kuwait in 1990. We kicked them out in in 1991, then had a NFZ until 2003.

Iran helped to create Hezbollah its current leadership structure in 1988 the same year the war ended.

Both countries coming from a decade long war with many veterans and arms exported their fight across the Middle east the day after the war ended.

10 posted on 03/23/2011 11:52:55 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: unseen1

Timmy P said he was the first to call for a no fly zone.

I said to him through the television that I believe he was mistaken, he never replied.


11 posted on 03/23/2011 11:59:30 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge ( SARAH PALIN 2012, PLEASE LORD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane
We have a precedent for this BTW. Iran/Iraq war. We kept both sides functional and shooting. Worked great until the war, sadly, as all wars must, stopped.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

12 posted on 03/23/2011 11:59:52 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge
lol....yeah I heard that too.

Palin do this day is the first and only one to call for the NFZ for the correct reason. The destruction of the American murdering dictator.

13 posted on 03/23/2011 12:02:27 PM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

How is Sunni slaughtering Shiite a bad thing? Tell me. Please. Cause I want to know.


14 posted on 03/23/2011 12:53:36 PM PDT by DariusBane (People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson