|
| September 14, 2004 |
 |
|
| |
|
Administration
Hits New Low in Snowmobile Dispute
The Bush Administration is proposing
to allow 720 snowmachines per day into Yellowstone National
Park, more than double the number that roared into the park last
winter. The proposal ignores new reports from the Park Service
that even last winter's much lower entrance numbers exceeded
standards to protect visitors' enjoyment of winter quiet and
natural sounds. The administration's solution? Change the
standards!
In July, we asked you to weigh in with the
National Park Service as it decided which issues to examine in a
new environmental assessment on Yellowstone winter use. Now the
assessment is out in draft form. We need your help again. The
new scheme does nothing to ease snowmobile damage in the park.
The agency concedes as much. Please join us and more than 300
retired, non-political career employees of the National Park
Service to demand that the Bush Administration do better in
Yellowstone.
The deadline for comments is
Monday, September 20, 2004. You can send that
message immediately from http://ga1.org/campaign/yellowstone2/wd8ks5x498w53n
Photo above: Snowmobiles at west entrance
of Yellowstone National Park, WY. Photo courtesy of David Long.
Below: Bison forced by snowmobilers to expend precious winter
energy reserves in Yellowstone National Park. Photo courtesy of
Jeff Henry.
Snowmobiles in Yellowstone: Playing Politics With our
Parks
In late 2000, the National Park
Service (NPS) announced it would replace damaging snowmobile use
in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks with
park-friendly, multi-passenger snowcoaches. The decision
followed decades of scientific study and three years of
enthusiastic public involvement. The Environmental Protection
Agency supported the NPS conclusion that the only way to protect
the parks and follow the law was to phase out snowmobiles.
Now, after four years, two administrations, two
additional scientific studies, more than $3 million and over
half a million public comments, the conclusion remains
unchanged: the only way to protect these parks and the health
and safety of those who work in and visit them is to phase out
snowmobiles. Unfortunately, the snowmobile industry and the
politicians have decided that snowmobile use should continue in
the parks, never mind science and public opinion.
Legal-Political
Shuttlecock The Wilderness
Society and its allies have been working to defend Yellowstone
and Grand Teton National Parks through administrative and
judicial action. Last fall, in response to our pleadings, a
federal judge in the District of Columbia ordered the
administration to implement the original decision and begin the
phaseout. You can guess what happened next: the industry headed
back to court and convinced another federal judge to take a
contrary position.
In response, the administration began
yet another environmental assessment of the issue last spring.
The results, not surprisingly, are the same: phasing out
snowmobiles and replacing them with mass-transit snowcoaches
best protects Yellowstone and its visitors. Unfortunately the
newly-proposed decision is also unchanged: keep polluting
snowmobiles in the park.
The Science
Remains Unchanged Continuing
snowmobile use in Yellowstone will undercut America's
long-standing commitment to protect its national parks. The
administration's proposal to allow 720 snowmobiles a day in
Yellowstone rejects the essence of the National Park Service's
mission: to protect our parks for the safe enjoyment of all
Americans and to pass them on, unimpaired, to future
generations.
In the just-published environmental
assessment, the agency itself warns the latest proposal will
have these consequences:
- VISITOR AND EMPLOYEE HEALTH:
"Exposure to toxic air pollutants, such as benzene and toluene,
would remain a concern."
- NOISE: "Employees and
visitors may choose to wear hearing protection to mitigate these
impacts."
- WILDLIFE: "Minimizing human disturbance and
harassment of wildlife is not expected to be accomplished."
Despite repeated such warnings from its own
professionals, the administration's policy toward Yellowstone
has been stubbornly ideological: snowmobiles must be allowed
into the National Park. The latest proposal follows that
pattern.
There Is a Better
Way! And it isn't rocket science.
It is plain old, common sense natural science. While that
science may be inconvenient for the administration, it is also
irrefutable. The National Park Service's analyses have three
times confirmed that providing visitors access by snowcoaches
instead of snowmobiles ensures our opportunity to see the winter
beauty of Yellowstone and Grand Teton without compromising the
quality or safety of others' experience, and without inflicting
damage on two of America's most-loved National Parks.
The latest proposal is so egregious that over 300
retired non-political career employees of the National Park
Service have come together to demand that their former agency do
better in Yellowstone.
How You Can Help:
Send your comments to the Park Service today! The flood of public concern on this issue
has saved Yellowstone from policies that would have been even
more harmful. It has kept national park advocates in Congress
and scores of major newspapers across the country vigilant to
this watershed decision for the National Park System. Please
join 300 retired park professionals and us to tell the
administration that it is out of touch with Americans like you
who believe that we shouldn't have to wear ear plugs and gas
masks to enjoy the winter magic of our first national park. It
is time to phase-out snowmobiles from Yellowstone, not more than
double their numbers.
The deadline for comments
is Monday, September 20, 2004. You can take immediate
action from http://ga1.org/campaign/yellowstone2/wd8ks5x498w53n
If
you'd rather write your own letter, and we hope you will
consider it, we've provided contact information and a sample
letter from which you can draw the major points.
Contact Information Superintendent
Suzanne Lewis Superintendent Mary Gibson Scott Temporary
Winter Use Plans EA P.O. Box 168 Yellowstone National
Park, WY 82190 Web comment site: http://home.nwindenv.com/YNP_Comments4/
(No email available for submitting comments)
Words to
Heed "If the Administration
goes through with this, it will mark a new low in its pattern of
ignoring science to benefit a special interest at the public's
expense. Boxed in by its own first study, the Administration is
now using a superficial process to sweep under the rug what 10
years of science have demonstrated conclusively is best for our
nation's first national park and the health and safety of its
visitors." --Michael Finley, former
Superintendent of Yellowstone and Everglades National Parks
Sample
Letter
Dear Superintendents Lewis and Scott:
The treasures of Yellowstone and Grand Teton National
Parks belong to all Americans. I urge you not to weaken
protective standards in the park to accommodate the industry but
to begin the phaseout of snowmobiles that will protect the park,
its employees and its visitors.
In three separate
analyses, your agency has determined that continued snowmobile
use threatens park resources, visitors' healthy enjoyment of the
parks, and employee health and safety. Each study pointed to the
solution: end snowmobile use and expand snowcoach use.
It is your statutory obligation to choose the safer,
more protective option for winter access and Alternative 1 in
the August 2004 Environmental Assessment provides it. But you
have rejected it in favor of continued snowmobile use, the
consequences of which, as you have conceded, include worrisome
exposure of visitors and employees to cancer-causing chemicals.
You acknowledge wildlife disturbance is likely to continue
despite your legal duty to ensure that it does not.
While law and management policy oblige you to manage our
common heritage on behalf of all visitors, you are inverting the
guiding ethic of our national parks to favor one use and one set
of users. That ignores your own verified scientific conclusions
and dismisses the public opinion you have sought on so many
occasions.
Whether this choice is being forced on the
National Park Service from a political level or represents a
tragic failure of leadership within the agency itself, I do not
know. Either way, it places the snowmobile industry's interests
above the public interest and sets a dangerous precedent for our
National Park System.
I urge you not to weaken standards
in Yellowstone and Grand Teton. Instead, please implement
Alternative 1 and immediately begin the transition to
snowcoaches.
Sincerely, (Your name and
address)
|