Mailing list search service

1. Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 (score: 45) (17,651 bytes)
Author: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:44:16 +0100 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <a707f8300803130700g63c9e6d6gdb2c9ac3909d30f5@mail.gmail.com> References: 1

Mark, I am afraid I diverge a bit with your analysis, although I agree that we have to be a bit loose in the final specification. You refer to the RDF Concept document which, indeed, refers to the XM

2. Possible solutions for ISSUE 87 (score: 31) (9,620 bytes)
Author: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>, Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:00:51 +0000 List: Public/www-rdf-interest

Hello all, During our discussions last week, I suggested that there are a number of ways that we could tackle the rdf:XMLLiteral question. However, the more I've delved into this, the more I've had t

3. RE: DC in XHTML2 (score: 10) (10,959 bytes)
Author: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>, Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:13:28 -0400 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <58D4BA7E-FA26-4F94-9C12-74591C7F9B6B@S009> References: 1

That is not how I read the question. As I read the question, that is not what they want to do; rather that is *where they found a roadblock in the path to a solution that they were going down.* I don

4. Fwd: Syndication model convergence and RDF (score: 8) (8,627 bytes)
Author: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:12:10 +0100 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <1f2ed5cd050131020124b23ce3@mail.gmail.com> References: 1

I sent the mail below to a list set up by folks working on common libs for syndication in Java a few days ago. Following discussion in the "missing bit of RDF for XML people" thread, I reckon this is

5. Re: XMLLiterals and language (score: 31) (4,849 bytes)
Author: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:14:08 +0900 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <41EE8781.3010109@gmuer.ch> References: 1 2 3 4 5 6

many titles consist only of English words, however they are the German titles Yes, but then there is also the question of whether these are really still English, or already German. This is a question

6. Re: ROR - Resources of a Resource (score: 10) (3,655 bytes)
Author: Laurian Gridinoc <laurian@gmail.com>, Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:09:00 +0200 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <003101c4e6a0$8d501c90$0201a8c0@Sony> References: 1 2

Hello, I'll bring into discussion the Jon Hanna's resource/representation vocabulary draft [1], which seems closer to the developer point of view. Beside composition (similar with dc:hasPart, ror:res

7. Re: Really Simple Validation (score: 13) (6,659 bytes)
Author: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:43:56 +0100 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <ede42072041115202355e798cd@mail.gmail.com> References: 1 2 3

Randy Charles Morin has been putting together a Schematron-based validator [0], aiming to cover all common syndication formats. A specific issue has come up relating to the use of modules, and what i

8. Re: Email Address as FOAF term (score: 8) (2,552 bytes)
Author: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:30:14 -0400 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <20040929142214.GA30818@peanut.crschmidt.net> References: 1 2

It was recently (foafcamp and foaf galway meetings) re-drawn to my attention that language tagging also affects plain literal comparisons. The FOAF spec should probably be updated to encourage people

9. RE: Encoding arbitrary literals in RDF/XML (score: 81) (4,574 bytes)
Author: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>, Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:28:36 +0100 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <1E4A0AC134884349A21955574A90A7A50ADCDA@trebe051.ntc.nokia.com> References: 1

Reason for this discussion is that XML does It is a perfectly legal Unicode character but, just for the record, it is perfectly valid for an application to apply special meaning to Unicode characters

10. Re: Reification - whats best practice? (score: 8) (2,795 bytes)
Author: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:58:53 -0400 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <413224D7.4040501@gnowsis.com> References: 1 2 3

Hi Leo, The RDFCore specs are finished, fixed and stable. I'm not against the idea of people exploring possible RDF-based successor specs that improve the ability to exchange provenance, but please d

11. RE: RSS data transience and the semantic web (score: 8) (3,323 bytes)
Author: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>, Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:35:50 -0400 List: Public/www-rdf-interest

Here's a simple use case: I learn from an RSS feed about an article in an online magazine on a topic I'm interested in. I read it, and decide that the author is so clever and insightful that I want t

12. Re: RSS data transience and the semantic web (score: 8) (5,656 bytes)
Author: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>, Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:43:34 +0200 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <045940FAA8DACD4993AAF08A091FBD3D203875@scf01.intra.boxuk.net> References: 1

I do think CMS/blogging tool vendors should be encouraged to retain machine-readable versions of their output, even if just the metadata with pointers to content, along the lines suggested by the ol

13. Re: Ideas for store for IFP smushing (score: 13) (6,308 bytes)
Author: "Phil Dawes" <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>, Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:43:39 +0000 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <411734F9.2080802@gnowsis.com> References: 1 2

Hi Leo, Do you mean leave the triples as-is, but add SIA statements to store? Do you have an algorithm for doing an SIA-inclusive query? I'd be eager to see if it would meet my performance requiremen

14. Re: Ideas for store for IFP smushing (score: 8) (4,431 bytes)
Author: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>, Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 10:25:29 +0200 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <16659.29442.592995.226111@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: 1

I had a discussion with Joe Geldart about exactly this thing on friday. I think smushing is a good idea to integrate data-stores and based on IFPs, it should be a good technique. But I would base it

15. Re: Mistaken identity? (score: 8) (3,702 bytes)
Author: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>, Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:20:59 -0400 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <1088029923.40da04e33d664@82.195.128.192> References: 1 2 3 4

Well, 1) and 3) go together nicely. It's just 2) that is the odd man out. A lot of people would like to have a retrievable URI denote the thing that gets retrieved, or at least the resource of which

16. Turtle terse rdf triple language updates (score: 17) (3,123 bytes)
Author: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:26:31 +0000 List: Public/www-rdf-interest

I've had some good feedback from various people with respect to Turtle and since the last version I announced on www-rdf-interest 2004-01-19 and I have made a couple of changes since then. Turtle htt

17. RE: call for rdf (score: 8) (2,688 bytes)
Author: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:05:59 -0500 (EST) List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EBE5326B@lnxdayexch06gb.lexis-nexis.com> References: 1

You might also like to scrape http://esw.w3.org/topic/AnRdfHarvesterStartingPoint which is meant to lead you to collections of RDF. cheers Chaals Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charl

18. Best practices - how to avoid duplication (score: 10) (5,031 bytes)
Author: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 10:58:07 -0500 (EST) List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <0312041070.AA1070551667@actia.fr> References: 1

Hi, (This isn't necessarily a description of THE best practice. Just stuff that I think would help). The question is whether there is some way to know that the two literals are the same thing (both a

19. RE: AW: Literals representing people? (score: 119) (3,102 bytes)
Author: "LYNN,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)" <james.lynn@hp.com>, Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 08:17:45 -0400 List: Public/www-rdf-interest

Very clear. Thanks, James They wouldn't be explicitly equivalent. But given a pair of inference rules relating the two forms, one could entail either of the two graphs from the other. I.e. IF ?s ex:m

20. Re: AW: Literals representing people? (score: 113) (3,066 bytes)
Author: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 09:34:37 +0300 List: Public/www-rdf-interest
In-Reply-To: <qXsK4.A.AUC.6Mwe_@metia>

Both 1 and 3 have the blank node, and are identical expressions of the same graph. In 1, a local identifier is used as NTriples doesn't provide for the contracted form expressed in 3. But they repres