Last updated on 8th January 2009

 

The time now in the UK is

 

 

 

 

(More about Stein and that quotation HERE)

 

 


 

 

 

See Archive about Amnesty's latest campaign

 

 
Online Reference
Dictionary, Encyclopedia & more
Word:
Look in: Dictionary & thesaurus
Computing Dictionary
Medical Dictionary
Legal Dictionary
Financial Dictionary
Acronyms
Idioms
Wikipedia Encyclopedia
Columbia Encyclopedia
by:

Wikipedia Affiliate Button

 

 


 

 

                

Google Book Search

 

 

The Google translator is here:
 
http://tinyurl.com/5jtd8u
 
 
Click "Add to Google", then use the arrow/scroll bar to find Arabic

 

 

 


 

 

 

Enter a long URL to make tiny:

 

 

 

Links to interesting websites

 

HERE

 

 

 


 

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/08/opinion/08khalidi.html?_r=1


January 8, 2009
Op-Ed Contributor
New York Times


What You Don’t Know About Gaza
By RASHID KHALIDI

Rashid Khalidi, a professor of Arab studies at Columbia, is the author of the forthcoming “Sowing Crisis: The Cold War and American Dominance in the Middle East."

NEARLY everything you’ve been led to believe about Gaza is wrong. Below are a few essential points that seem to be missing from the conversation, much of which has taken place in the press, about Israel’s attack on the Gaza Strip.

THE GAZANS Most of the people living in Gaza are not there by choice. The majority of the 1.5 million people crammed into the roughly 140 square miles of the Gaza Strip belong to families that came from towns and villages outside Gaza like Ashkelon and Beersheba. They were driven to Gaza by the Israeli Army in 1948.

THE OCCUPATION The Gazans have lived under Israeli occupation since the Six-Day War in 1967. Israel is still widely considered to be an occupying power, even though it removed its troops and settlers from the strip in 2005. Israel still controls access to the area, imports and exports, and the movement of people in and out. Israel has control over Gaza’s air space and sea coast, and its forces enter the area at will. As the occupying power, Israel has the responsibility under the Fourth Geneva Convention to see to the welfare of the civilian population of the Gaza Strip.

THE BLOCKADE Israel’s blockade of the strip, with the support of the United States and the European Union, has grown increasingly stringent since Hamas won the Palestinian Legislative Council elections in January 2006. Fuel, electricity, imports, exports and the movement of people in and out of the Strip have been slowly choked off, leading to life-threatening problems of sanitation, health, water supply and transportation.

The blockade has subjected many to unemployment, penury and malnutrition. This amounts to the collective punishment — with the tacit support of the United States — of a civilian population for exercising its democratic rights.

THE CEASE-FIRE Lifting the blockade, along with a cessation of rocket fire, was one of the key terms of the June cease-fire between Israel and Hamas. This accord led to a reduction in rockets fired from Gaza from hundreds in May and June to a total of less than 20 in the subsequent four months (according to Israeli government figures). The cease-fire broke down when Israeli forces launched major air and ground attacks in early November; six Hamas operatives were reported killed.

WAR CRIMES The targeting of civilians, whether by Hamas or by Israel, is potentially a war crime. Every human life is precious. But the numbers speak for themselves: Nearly 700 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed since the conflict broke out at the end of last year. [At least 765 Palestinian lives are said by sources in Gaza to have been lost since the offensive began 13 days ago. - BBC online, page last updated at 21:50 GMT, Thursday, 8 January 2009. - BR] In contrast, there have been around a dozen Israelis killed, many of them soldiers. Negotiation is a much more effective way to deal with rockets and other forms of violence. This might have been able to happen had Israel fulfilled the terms of the June cease-fire and lifted its blockade of the Gaza Strip.

This war on the people of Gaza isn’t really about rockets. Nor is it about “restoring Israel’s deterrence,” as the Israeli press might have you believe. Far more revealing are the words of Moshe Yaalon, then the Israeli Defense Forces chief of staff, in 2002: “The Palestinians must be made to understand in the deepest recesses of their consciousness that they are a defeated people.”

Rashid Khalidi, a professor of Arab studies at Columbia, is the author of the forthcoming “Sowing Crisis: The Cold War and American Dominance in the Middle East."
 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 
guardian.co.uk
 

Letters

EU must hold Israel to its agreements

  • The Guardian, Monday 5 January 2009
Despite the EU's call for a ceasefire, the brutal Israeli bombing of Gaza continues (Reports, 3 January). Nonetheless, the EU is preparing to upgrade its existing agreement to give Israel even more privileged access to European institutions.

In December, the council of ministers voted to support this upgrade, ignoring the fact that Israel was in breach of an "essential element" of the earlier agreement. This required states to respect "human rights and democratic principles, which guides their internal and international policy and constitutes an essential element of this agreement". The proposed upgrade is even weaker and includes no obligations on Israel in respect of its illegal settlements, the illegal wall, and its repeated breaches of international human rights and international humanitarian law.

In view of the horrific events of the past days, we call on: 1) The UK government to revoke its support for any new agreements with Israel and for this to be communicated forthwith to the Czech presidency of the EU in advance of its meeting with the commission, and to the EU council of ministers 2) The European parliament to refuse to endorse any extension of existing agreements and to use its influence to prevent any upgrades of EU benefits to Israel until it abides by its international legal and humanitarian obligations.

Dr Daniele Albertazzi, Birmingham U
Ghassan Abu-Sitta
Dr Salah Abou-El-Fadl, Consultant Psychiatrist
Dr Arshin Adib-Moghaddam, SOAS
Navtej Singh Ahluwalia - Human Rights Lawyer
Professor Sultan Barakat, York U
Alexander Baker
Professor Mona Baker, Manchester Met U
Sylvia Baker
Daphna Baram
Chris Williams Barrister
Alastair Beaton, playwright
Hilary Belchak
Dr Susan Blackwell, Birmingham U
Lauren Booth, writer, Director Aloha Palestine
Tim Bowly
Professor Haim Bresheeth, UEL, film maker
Dr Patrick Boyd, medicine
Joan Burt
Andrea Becker
Professor Lawrence Bush, Lancaster U
Professor Oren Ben-Dor, Southampton U
Rt Hon Tony Benn
Melissa Benn, writer
*Sir Geoffrey Bindman, human rights lawyer
*Professor Bill Bowring, human rights lawyer, UCL
Victoria Brittain
Eileen E. Brown OBE
Richard Burden MP
Dr Chris Burns-Cox
Dr John Chalcraft LSE
Sylvia Cohen
Sarah Colborne Chair,PSC
Dr Neil Cooper, Bradford U
Jeremy Corbyn MP
Jean Carmichael
Mark Cazalet
Professor Stan Cohen, LSE
*Sir Iain Chalmers, medicine
Rebecca Chapman barrister
Professor Christine Chinkin International Law LSE
*Caryl Churchill playwright
Professor Greville Corbett, Surrey U
Magda Cross
Dr Paul Cobley, London MetropolitanU
Judith Collin
Julia Cutmore
Professor Tony Davies
Khaleel Desai, lawyer
*Professor the Lord Meghnad Desai, LSE
*Jenny Diski, writer
Professor Elizabeth Ettorre, Liverpool U
Mark Elf, JSF
Dr Sam Edwards
Stephen Ford
Roy George
Dr. Eileen Gergis
Arthur Goodman
*Prof Sir John Goody, Cambridge U anthropologist
Professor Penny Green Law King's Coll London
Jean Grudgings
Dr Ramez Ghazoul
*Blinne Ni Ghralaigh, barrister
Paul Gordon, psychotherapist
Professor John Gledhill
Ann Girling
Professor Mohamed El-Gomati, York U
Abe Hayeem, architect, Chair APJP
Lee Hall playwright
Kate Harrison. Solicitor
David Harries, social worker
Professor Kamel Hawwash, Birmingham U
Peter Herbert, barrister, Chair Society of Black Lawyers
*John Hilary, Director War on Want
Mike Hodges (film maker)*
Professor Ted Honderich, University College London
Keith Hammond
*Jeremy Hardy comedian
Galit Hess
George Hill
Richard Hudson, UCL
Betty Hunter Secretary PSC
Jocelyn Hurndall (mother of Tom Hurndall, killed after being shot in the head in Gaza on 11 April 2003)
Sue Ingham
Dan Judelson, Secretary, EJJP
Dr Paula James, Open U
*Professor Steve Jones, University College London
*Dr Charles Jencks, architectural critic
Professor David Johnston, Queens University
Zina Jardaneh
Jane Jewell, founder, 14 Friends of Palestine
Professor Adah Kay
David Jones
Professor Ken Jones, Keele
Rosemary Jones
*Stephen Kamlish QC
Helen Kay
Dr Laleh Khalili, SOAS
Dr Paul Kelemen, Manchester U
Professor Richard Keeble, Lincoln U
*Salma Karmi-Ayyoub, barrister
Richard Kuper, JFJP
Dr Ghada Karmi, writer
Helen Kimble
*Michael Kustow, writer
David Lepper MP
Roger Lloyd Pack
*Rt Rev Michael Langrish, Bishop of Exeter
Dr Stephen Leah
Sonja Linden, playwright
Professor Yosefa Loshitzky
Dr Michael Loughlin
Dr Caroline Lucas MEP
*Daniel Machover Solicitor, Chair Lawyers for Palestinian Human Rights
Professor Moshe Machover, LSE
Deborah Maccoby, ICAHD
Jehane Markham
Sonia Markham, counseller
Mike Marqusee, writer
Dr Su Metcalfe, Cambridge U
*Baroness Sue Miller, lib-dem spokesman on home affairs
Moira McDowall
Tom McVitie
Dr Michael Marten, Stirling U
Emeritus Professor Stanley Mitchell
Professor Marjory Mayo, Goldmiths U
*Mary Midgley, philosopher and writer
Annie Mitchell Clinical Psychologist, Plymouth U
Peter Quentin Morgan
Piers Mostyn, barrister
Kaveh Moussavi, Oxford U
Professor Martha Mundy, LSE
Rob Murthwaite, lecturer in law
Ali Nasralla
Ann Nazareth
Mary Nazzal-Batayneh
Diana Neslen
Ephraim Nimni, Queens U Belfast
Ken O'Keefe, Aloha Palestine
Declan Owens, Haldane Society
*Susie Orbach, psychotherapist
Professor David Pegg, York U
Professor Renos Papadopoulos, Essex U
John Page
Gail Parfitt -Women for peace
Sarah Perrigo Bradford U
Dr Terry Phillips
Liz Philipson, conflict analyst
Margo Picken
John Pilger, writer
Veronica Planton
Polly Pollock
Peter Poore
Dr Janet Powney
Alison Prager, ICAHD
*Bath &Wells Bish is Rt Rev Peter Price
Patricia Price-Tomes
Annabelle Purdi
Professor Dee Reynolds, Manchester U
Ripon Ray
Dr Terry Robbins
Dr Brian Robinson
M. Robinson
Dr Paul Robinson, Psychiatrist
Ernest Rodker designer
Professor Margaret Rogers, Surrey U
*Emerita Professor Hilary Rose, Bradford U
*Professor Jacqueline Rose
Simon Rose
Emeritus Professor Steven Rose, Open U
Professor Barbara Rosenbaum, UCL
Professor Jonathan Rosenhead, LSE
*Leon Rosselson, musician
Profcssor Myriam Salama-Carr, Bradford U
Professor Donald Sassoon, Queen Mary, London
Colin Salmon, actor
Dr Gabriela Saldanha, Birmingham U
Professor Andrew Samuels, psychoanalyst
Sadat Sayeed, human rights barrister
Dr Amanda Sackur,London Metropolitan U
Sarah Scampton
*The Right Reverend Michael Scott-Joynt, Bishop of Winchester
Professor Richard Seaford, Exeter U
Professor Lynne Segal, Birkbeck Coll.
Professor David Seddon, UEA
Satish Sekar, writer
Professor Richard Sennett, LSE
Professor Avi Shlaim, Oxford U
Rt Hon. Clare Short MP
Professor David Slater, Loughborough U
Emeritus Professor Neil Smith UCL
*Roger Smith, director, Justice
*Ahdaf Soueif, writer
Hugh Southey, barrister
Dr Phyllis Starkey MP
Richard Stainton
*Mark Steel, comedian
Heather Stroud
Dr Derek Summerfield
Dr Marcelo Svirsky, Cardiff U
Professor Alan Thomas Swansea U
Rebecca Thorn musician
*Baroness Jenny Tonge
*Professor Peter Townsend, LSE
Professor Jules Townshend, Manchester Met U
Paul Troop human rights lawyer
Mandy Turner, Bradford U
Lisa Thorne, clinical psychologist
Leslie Thomas, barrister
Marc Vallee, photojournalist
Dr Charles Ward (medicine)
Greg Wilkinson
Dr Jeni Williams, Trinity College, Carmarthen
*Elizabeth Woodcraft, barrister
Dr David Worth
Professor Brian Wynne, Lancaster U
Dr Monica Wusteman, York U
Dr Gill Yudkin
Professor Nira Yuval-Davis, UEL
Roger van Zwanenburg, publisher
Internationals
Hans von Sponeck, Former UN Coordinator for Iraq
Luisa Morgantini Vice President of the European Parliament
Israelis
Dr Deulle Luski Aim, Tel Aviv U
Yafit Gamila Biso, Olive tree movement
Dr Uri Davis
Dr Rachel Giora
Neta Golan
Anat Matar, Tel-Aviv U
Rotem Mor
Rayna Moss
Dorothy Naor
Nurit Peled-Elhanan, Sakharov Prize 2001
Vlad Rivlin
Att. Lea Tsemel
Michael Warschawski
Dr David Wesley
Elana Wesley
Also 3 from Australia1 Austria2 Belgium2 Canada1 Croatia1 Denmark3 France4 Germany1 Ireland1 Italy2 Malta1 Sweden21 US (including Noam Chomsky) and 15 unidentified locations

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

In these dark times, a really inspiring lecture

from the great

Howard Zinn

 

From DemocracyNow!

Howard Zinn on "War and Social Justice"

 

 

 

"Howard Zinn is one of this country’s most celebrated historians. His classic work A People’s History of the United States changed the way we look at history in America. First published a quarter of a century ago, the book has sold over a million copies and is a phenomenon in the world of publishing—selling more copies each successive year. After serving as a bombardier in World War II, Howard Zinn went on to become a lifelong dissident and peace activist. He was active in the civil rights movement and many of the struggles for social justice over the past forty years. He taught at Spelman College, the historically black college for women, and was fired for insubordination for standing up for the students. He was recently invited back to give the commencement address. Howard Zinn has written numerous books and is professor emeritus at Boston University. He recently spoke at Binghamton University a few days after the 2008 presidential election. His speech was called “War and Social Justice.” [includes rush transcript]"

 

See also

History is a Weapon

http://historyisaweapon.com/zinnapeopleshistory.html

A People's History Of The United States
by Howard Zinn

Presented by History Is A Weapon


1. Columbus, The Indians, and Human Progress

2. Drawing the Color Line

3. Persons of Mean and Vile Condition

4. Tyranny is Tyranny

5. A Kind of Revolution

6. The Intimately Oppressed

7. As Long As Grass Grows Or Water Runs

8. We Take Nothing by Conquest, Thank God

9. Slavery Without Submission, Emancipation Without Freedom

10. The Other Civil War

11. Robber Barons And Rebels

12. The Empire and the People

13. The Socialist Challenge

14. War Is the Health of the State

15. Self-help in Hard Times

16. A People's War?

17. "Or Does It Explode?"

18. The Impossible Victory: Vietnam

19. Surprises

20. The Seventies: Under Control?

21. Carter-Reagan-Bush: The Bipartisan Consensus

22. The Unreported Resistance

23. The Clinton Presidency and the Crisis of Democracy

24.The Coming Revolt of the Guards

24. [sic - should be 25] The 2000 Election and the "War on Terrorism"

 

From the same website:

History isn't what happened, but a story of what happened. And there are always different versions, different stories, about the same events. One version might revolve mainly around a specific set of facts while another version might minimize them or not include them at all.
 

Like stories, each of these different versions of history contain different lessons. Some histories tell us that our leaders, at least, have always tried to do right for everyone. Others remark that the emperors don't have the slaves' best interests at heart. Some teach us that this is both what has always been and what always will be. Others counsel that we shouldn't mistake transient dominance for intrinsic superiority. Lastly, some histories paint a picture where only the elites have the power to change the world, while others point out that social change is rarely commanded from the top down.
 

Regardless of the value of these many lessons, History isn't what happened, but the stories of what happened and the lessons these stories include. The very selection of which histories to teach in a society shapes our view of how what is came to be and, in turn, what we understand as possible. This choice of which history to teach can never be "neutral" or "objective." Those who choose, either following a set agenda or guided by hidden prejudices, serve their interests. Their interests could be to continue this world as it now stands or to make a new world.
 

We cannot simply be passive. We must choose whose interests are best: those who want to keep things going as they are or those who want to work to make a better world. If we choose the latter, we must seek out the tools we will need. History is just one tool to shape our understanding of our world. And every tool is a weapon if you hold it right.

 


A Note and a disclaimer.
The Note: This great book should really be read by everyone. It is difficult to describe why it so great because it both teaches and inspires. You really just have to read it. We think it is so good that it demands to be as accessible as possible. Once you've finished it, we're sure you'll agree. In fact, years ago, we would offer people twenty dollars if they read the book and didn't think it was completely worth their time. Of all the people who took us up on it, no one collected.
The disclaimer: This version is made from OCR. That is a fancy way of saying that we scanned in and coded over six hundred fifty pages. There will be a few small occasional errors: spelling mistakes, odd punctuation, and the like. If you see any, please contact us. We have posted it in spite of these mistakes for two simple reasons. First, the book is worth a mistake or two because it really deserves the widest audience possible. Second, we are sure that once you new people begin reading it, you'll go out and get a physical copy. You should go and get it (and ones for your friends and family). At this point, A People's History Of The United States is available in regular form, read aloud on audio, on posters, in a teaching edition, and as just the twentieth century chapters(We have all but the posters). And now here. Please Enjoy!

 

 

 


 

 

Israeli Human Rights Organizations Initiate Gaza Blog

From Physicians for Human Rights - Israel

 
PLEASE DISTRIBUTE:
 
"In the course of the fighting in Gaza, Israeli human rights organization will provide updates regarding the impact of the attacks on the civilian population in Gaza. The updates include reports that reach human rights organizations as well as information gathered by human rights and humanitarian aid groups. This information is but a small part of what has transpired in the course of the fighting and does not provide a comprehensive picture, nor does not constitute a list of the most serious human rights violations.
 
"Since many organizations' fieldworkers cannot arrive at the scene of events to gather testimony as they would normally, a significant amount of this information has had to rely on telephone reports. The information is being confirmed to the extent possible under the current circumstances. The blog's aim is to provide information that is not otherwise available to the general public through the media."
 
To access the blog:
 
Hebrew:
 
English:

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DCI-PS Urgent Appeal

 

 

 

 

The Independent report

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

Mr Ehud Olmert
Prime Minister, Israel
 
c.c.  Ms Tzipi Livni
        Acting Prime Minister, Minister of Foreign Affairs
        Israel
 
 
Dear Prime Minister,
 
Israel's current action on Gaza
 
I'm Jewish, but even if I weren't I'd still loathe the illiberal ideology of Hamas (and Hezbollah) that is antithetical to everything I believe in.
 
But what Israel has been doing to Gazans in the past few days, let alone the past 18 months, is very, very wrong.  Not only is your current onslaught on Gazan people morally indefensible, but in purely practical terms you surely must know, as intelligent realists, that it is going to be hugely counterproductive.
 
During a 10-day study tour recently of parts of Israel and the West Bank with colleagues from the medical and related professions, I was able to confirm what is already well known about the effects of the occupation (whether you accept or not that there is one) on the health and social wellbeing of Palestinians.
 
But what I was less prepared for was the evidence concerning the consequences for the health of Israelis as well.  These include a soaring rate of increase in domestic violence, in the murder rate amongst Israeli males, and - something that used to be rather rare amongst Jews - a big increase in the incidence of alcoholism.
 
In other words, bad as current Israeli policies are for Palestinians, they are having a disastrous effect on Israelis too.  Even if not for the sake of the former, for the sake of the latter, one would hope that Israel would change course.
 
You would, I believe, say that you do what you do not simply for the security of Israelis, but for all Jews, that you act, as the phrase has it, "in the name of" Jews everywhere.  Many claim that when you do good things, it reflects well on us - for example if your scientists discover a new therapeutic tool, or bring developments in information technology.
 
But that cuts both ways, and when you do bad things we all stand to lose.  I would never want to say, nor would I try to, that I'm not Jewish (although many fellow Jews, supportive of Israel, have tried to claim that people like me aren't "proper Jews" because we are critical of Israel).  And yet I believe that many of us do feel that Israeli actions have left us with no other choice than to state that the only way we can be Jewish whilst holding on to our humanity is to make unambiguous statements, declared very clearly as Jews, religious or secular, believing or atheist, but always culturally Jewish, that we cannot support what you are doing.
 
But I should really speak only for myself.  To be Jewish in the context that Israel (some would say Zionism) has created, a mere passive absence of support is not enough.  I do this with no sense whatever of triumphalism, but with a complex feeling of loss, grief and pain - I have to oppose in the only ways open to me, words and economics.
 
I seriously doubt that one individual telling you to stop visiting death and destruction upon a beleaguered people is going to make you stop.  How many of us will it take to make you reconsider?  I do not know, but I am prepared to conjecture that it will not be too long before we shall all have found out.
 
Yours sincerely
 
 

Dr Brian Robinson

Retired Psychiatrist, British National Health Service

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

Where's the Academic Outrage Over the Bombing of a University in Gaza?

 

By Neve Gordon and Jeff Halper

Not one of the 450 presidents of American colleges and universities, who denounced the decision of the union representing British academics to promote a boycott of Israeli universities, raised their voice against the bombardment of the Islamic University in Gaza. Columbia University President Lee Bollinger who organized the petition remained silent, as did his co-signatories from Princeton, Northwestern, MIT and Cornell. Most others who signed similar petitions, like the 11,000 professors from nearly 1,000 universities around the world, also refrained from expressing their outrage when the leading university in the Gaza Strip was attacked. The artfully named Scholars for Peace in the Middle East, which organized the latter appeal, surely had nothing to say about the assault.

The story was reported widely by the different news agencies, including the Chronicle. Ha’aretz noted that Israel “bombed the Islamic University and a government compound in Gaza City, key centers of Hamas power, in the third day of its aerial assault on the city.”  While the extent of the damage to the university, which was hit in six different air strikes, is unknown at this moment, Ha’aretz reported that “Two major buildings were leveled to the floor… One building was main laboratories and the other was lecture rooms buildings. Each building was 4 floors high.” Witnesses said the two university structures hit today were the science-laboratory block and the Women’s Building, where female students studied in classrooms separate from those for male students. There were no casualties, as the university was evacuated when the Israeli assault began on Saturday.

Virtually all the accounts agree that the Islamic University was attacked because it was a “cultural symbol” of the Hamas movement, the ruling party in the elected Palestinian government which Israel has targeted in its ongoing attacks on the Gaza Strip. Mysteriously, hardly any of the news articles emphasized the educational significance of this university, which exceeds by far its cultural or political symbolism.

Established – with the approval of the Israeli authorities – in 1978, the Islamic University is the first institution of higher education in the Gaza Strip and still its major and most important university, serving over 20,000 students, sixty percent of whom are women. It is comprised of ten faculties – education, religion, art, commerce, Shariah law, science, engineering, information technology, medicine and nursing – and awards B.A., B.Sc., M.A., M.Sc. and Diplomas. Taking into account that Palestinian universities have, in UNICEF’s words, been regionalized because Palestinian students from Gaza seeking higher education are barred by Israel from studying either in the West Bank or abroad, the educational significance of this institution becomes even more apparent.

These restrictions became international news when last summer, Israel refused to grant exit permits to seven carefully vetted Gazan students who has been awarded Fulbright fellowships by the State Department for study in the US. After the incident was covered by The New York Times, top State Department officials intervened to restore the students’ Fulbright fellowships – although Israel allowed only four of the seven to leave, even after appeals by Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice. “It is a welcome victory — for the students,” opined the New York Times in its July 8, 2008, editorial, “[and] for Israel, which should want to see more of Gaza’s young people follow a path of hope and education rather than hopelessness and martyrdom; and for the United States, whose image in the Middle East badly needs burnishing.”

Notwithstanding the importance of the Islamic University, Israel has tried to justify the bombing. An army spokeswoman told The Chronicle that the buildings had been used as “a research and development center for Hamas weapons, including Qassam rockets….One of the structures struck housed explosives laboratories that were an inseparable part of Hamas’s research and development program, as well as places that served as storage facilities for the organization. The development of these weapons took place under the auspices of senior lecturers who are activists in Hamas.”  

Islamic University officials denied the Israeli allegations. Yet even if there is some merit in them, it is common knowledge that practically all major American and Israeli universities are engaged in research and development of military applications, and receive funding from the Pentagon and defense corporations.  Unfortunately weapons development and even manufacture has become a major part of university systems worldwide – a fact that does not justify bombing them.  

How, given the unfolding events, should academics respond to this assault? Regardless of one’s stand on the boycott of Israeli universities, anyone so concerned about academic freedom as to put one’s name to a petition, should be outraged no less by Israel’s destruction of a Palestine university. The question, then, is whether the university presidents and professors who signed the different petitions will speak out against the bombing of an Islamic University. 

 

Neve Gordon is chair of the department of politics and government at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and author of Israel’s Occupation (University of California Press, 2008). Jeff Halper is director of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions. His latest book is An Israeli in Palestine: Resisting Dispossession, Redeeming Israel (Pluto Press, 2008).
 

 

 

 


 

 


 

Damaged Gaza aid boat docks in southern Lebanon - 30 Dec 08

Al Jazeera video on You Tube

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Taken from an ICAHD UK email briefing

 

Palestine’s Guernica and the Myths of Israeli Victimhood

 

An Opinion Editorial by Mustafa Barghouti, Secretary General of the Palestinian National Initiative, for The Washington Post, 29 Dec 2008

The Israeli campaign of ‘death from above’ began around 11 am on Saturday morning [27th] and stretched straight through the night into this morning. The massacre continues as I write these words.

The bloodiest single day in Palestine since the War of 1967 is far from over following on Israel’s promised that this is ‘only the beginning’ of their campaign of state terror. At least 290 people have been murdered thus far, but the body count continues to rise at a dramatic pace as more mutilated bodies are pulled from the rubble, previous victims succumb to their wounds and new casualties are created by the minute.

What has and is occurring is nothing short of a war crime, yet the Israeli public relations machine is in full-swing, churning out lies by the minute.

Once and for all it is time to expose the myths that they have created. 

  1. Israelis have claimed to have ended the occupation of the Gaza Strip in 2005.

While Israel has indeed removed the settlements from the tiny coastal Strip, they have in no way ended the occupation. They remained in control of the borders, the airspace and the waterways of Gaza, and have carried out frequent raids and targeted assassinations since the disengagement.

Furthermore, since 2006 Israel has imposed a comprehensive siege on the Strip. For over two years, Gazans have lived on the edge of starvation and without the most basic necessities of human life, such as cooking or heating oil and basic medications. This siege has already caused a humanitarian catastrophe which has only been exacerbated by the dramatic increase in Israeli military aggression.

  1. Israel claims that Hamas violated the cease-fire and pulled out of it unilaterally.

Hamas indeed respected their side of the ceasefire, except on those occasions early on when Israel carried out major offensives in the West Bank. In the last two months, the ceasefire broke down with Israelis killing several Palestinians and resulting in the response of Hamas. In other words, Hamas has not carried out an unprovoked act throughout the period of the cease-fire. 

Israel, however, did not live up to any of its obligations of ending the siege and allowing vital humanitarian aid to resume in Gaza. Rather than the average of 450 trucks per day being allowed across the border, on the best days only eighty have been allowed in – with the border remaining hermetically sealed 70% of the time. Throughout the supposed ‘cease-fire’ Gazans have been forced to live like animals, with a total of 262 dying due to the inaccessibility of proper medical care. 

Now after hundreds dead and counting, it is Israel who refuses to re-enter talks over a cease-fire. They are not intent on securing peace as they claim; it is more and more clear that they are seeking regime change – whatever the cost.

  1. Israel claims to be pursuing peace with ‘peaceful Palestinians’.

Before the on-going massacre in the Gaza Strip, and throughout the entirety of the Annapolis Peace Process, Israel has continued and even intensified its occupation of the West Bank. In 2008, settlement expansion increased by a factor of 38, a further 4,950 Palestinians were arrested – mostly from the West Bank, and checkpoints rose from 521 to 699.  

Furthermore, since the onset of the peace talks, Israel has killed 546 Palestinians, among them 76 children. These gruesome statistics are set to rise dramatically now, but previous Israeli transgressions should not be forgotten amidst this most recent horror.

Only this morning, Israel shot and killed a young peaceful protester in the West Bank village of Nihlin, and has injured dozens more over the last few hours. It is certain that they will continue to employ deadly force at non-violent demonstrations and we expect a sizable body count in the West Bank as a result. If Israel is in fact pursuing peace with ‘good Palestinians’, who are they talking about? 

  1. Israel is acting in self-defense.

It is difficult to claim self defense in a confrontation which they themselves have sparked, but they are doing it anyway. Self-defense is reactionary, while the actions of Israel over the last two days have been clearly premeditated. Not only did the Israeli press widely report the ongoing public relations campaign being undertaken by Israel to prepare Israeli and international public opinion for the attack, but Israel has also reportedly tried to convince the Palestinians that an attack was not coming by briefly opening crossings and reporting future meetings on the topic. They did so to ensure that casualties would be maximized and that the citizens of Gaza would be unprepared for their impending slaughter.  

It is also misleading to claim self-defense in a conflict with such an overwhelming asymmetry of power. Israel is the largest military force in the region, and the fifth largest in the world. Furthermore, they are the fourth largest exporter of arms and have a military industrial complex rivaling that of the United States. In other words, Israel has always had a comprehensive monopoly over the use of force, and much like its super power ally, Israel uses war as an advertising showcase of its many instruments of death.  

  1. Israel claims to have struck military targets only.

Even while image after image of dead and mutilated women and children flash across our televisions, Israel brazenly claims that their munitions expertly struck only military installations. We know this to be false as many other civilian sites have been hit by airstrikes including a hospital and mosque.  

In the most densely populated area on the planet, tons upon tons of explosives have been dropped. The first estimates of injured are in the thousands. Israel will claim that these are merely ‘collateral damage’ or accidental deaths. The sheer ridiculousness and inhumanity of such a claim should sicken the world community. 

  1. Israel claims that it is attacking Hamas and not the Palestinian people.

First and foremost, missiles do not differentiate people by their political affiliation; they simply kill everyone in their path. Israel knows this, and so do Palestinians. What Israel also knows, but is not saying publicly, is how much their recent actions will actually strengthen Hamas – whose message of resistance and revenge is being echoed by the angry and grieving. 

The targets of the strike, police and not Hamas militants, give us some clue as to Israel’s mistaken intention. They are hoping to create anarchy in the Strip by removing the pillar of law and order.  

  1. Israel claims that Palestinians are the source of violence.

Let us be clear and unequivocal. The occupation of Palestine since the War of 1967 has been and remains the root of violence between Israelis and Palestinians. Violence can be ended with the occupation and the granting of Palestine’s national and human rights. Hamas does not control the West Bank and yet we remain occupied, our rights violated and our children killed.  

With these myths understood, let us ponder the real reasons behind these airstrikes; what we find may be even more disgusting than the act itself. 

The leaders of Israel are holding press conferences, dressed in black, with sleeves rolled up.  ‘It’s time to fight’, they say, ‘but it won’t be easy.’  

To prove just how hard it is, Livni, Olmert and Barak did not even wear make-up to the press conference, and Barak has ended his election campaign to focus on the Gaza campaign. What heroes…what leaders… 

We all know the truth: the suspension of the electioneering is exactly that – electioneering. Like John McCain’s suspension of his presidential campaign to return to Washington to ‘deal with’ the financial crisis, this act is little more than a publicity stunt. 

The candidates have to appear ‘tough enough to lead’, and there is seemingly no better way of doing that than bathing in Palestinian blood.  

‘Look at me,’ Livni says in her black suit and unkempt hair, ‘I am a warrior. I am strong enough to pull the trigger. Don’t you feel more confident about voting for me, now that you know I am as ruthless as Bibi Netanyahu?’  

I do not know which is more disturbing, her and Barak, or the constituency they are trying to please.  

In the end, this will in no way improve the security of the average Israeli; in fact it can be expected to get much worse in the coming days as the massacre could presumably provoke a new generation of suicide bombers.  

It will not undermine Hamas either, and it will not result in the three fools, Barak, Livni and Olmert, looking ‘tough’. Their misguided political venture will likely blow up in their faces as did the brutally similar 2006 invasion of Lebanon. 

In closing, there is another reason - beyond the internal politics of Israel - why this attack has been allowed to occur: the complicity and silence of the international community.  

Israel cannot and would not act against the will of its economic allies in Europe or its military allies in the US.  Israel may be pulling the trigger ending hundreds, perhaps even thousands of lives this week, but it is the apathy of the world and the inhumane tolerance of Palestinian suffering which allows this to occur. 

‘The evil only exists because the good remain silent’

 From Occupied Palestine, 

Dr. Mustafa Baghouthi 

 

 

 

 

 

PRESS RELEASE - Israeli Gunboats Came out of the
Darkness and Rammed us Three Times

Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 4:47 PM


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Israeli Gunboats Came out of the Darkness and Rammed us Three Times

For more information, please contact:
(Gaza) Ewa Jasiewicz,         )
(Cyprus) Lubna Masarwa      ) I have redacted phone nos., e-addresses - BR
(Lebanon) Caoimhe Butterly  )
http://www.FreeGaza.org

(Lebanon, Tuesday 30 December) - Today the Free Gaza ship "Dignity"
carefully made its way to safe harbor in Tyre, Lebanon's southern-most
port city, after receiving serious structural damage when Israeli warships
rammed its bow and the port side. Waiting to greet the passengers and crew
were thousands of Lebanese who came out to show their solidarity with this
attempt to deliver volunteer doctors and desperately needed medical
supplies to war-ravaged Gaza. The Lebanese government has pledged to
provide a forensic analysis of what happened in the dark morning, when
Israel rammed the civilian ship in international waters, and put the
people on board in danger of losing their lives.

The Dignity, on a mission of mercy to besieged Gaza, was attacked by the
Israeli Navy at approximately 6am (UST) in international waters, roughly
90 miles off the coast of Gaza. Several Israeli warships surrounded the
small, human rights boat, firing live ammunition around it, then
intentionally ramming it three times. According to ship's captain Denis
Healy, the Israeli attack came, ""without any warning, or any
provocation."

Caoimhe Butterly, an organizer with the Free Gaza Movement, stated that,
"The gunboats gave us no warning. They came up out of the darkness firing
flares and flashing huge flood lights into our faces. We were so shocked
that at first we didn't react. We knew we were well within international
waters and supposedly safe from attack. They rammed us three times,
hitting the side of the boat hard. We began taking on water and, for a few
minutes, we all feared for our lives. After they rammed us, they started
screaming at us as we were frantically getting the life boats ready and
putting on our life jackets. They kept yelling that if we didn't turn back
they would shoot us."

Cynthia McKinney, former U.S. congresswoman and Green Party presidential
candidate, was traveling to Gaza aboard the Dignity in order to assess the
impact of Israel's military onslaught against the civilian population of
the Gaza Strip. According to McKinney, "Israeli patrol boats...tracked us
for about 30 minutes...and then all of a sudden they rammed us
approximately three times, twice in the front and once in the side...the
Israelis indicated that [they felt] we were involved in terrorist
activities."

The Dignity departed from Larnaca Port in Cyprus at 7pm (UST) on Monday 29
December with a cargo of over 3 tons of desperately needed medical
supplies donated to Gaza by the people of Cyprus. Three surgeons were also
aboard, traveling to Gaza to volunteer in overwhelmed hospitals and
clinics. The ship was searched by Cypriot Port authorities prior to
departure, and its passenger list was made public.

Israel's deplorable attack on the unarmed Dignity is a violation of both
international maritime law and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,
which states that "the high seas should be reserved for peaceful
purposes."

Delivering doctors and urgently needed medical supplies to civilians is a
just such a "peaceful purpose." Deliberately ramming a mercy ship and
endangering its passengers is an act of terrorism.

CALL the Israeli Government and demand that it immediately STOP attacking
the civilian population of Gaza and STOP using violence to prevent human
rights and humanitarian assistance to the Palestinian people.

Mark Regev in the Prime Minister's office at:
+972 2670 5354 or +972 5 0620 3264
mark.regev@it.pmo.gov.il


Shlomo Dror in the Ministry of Defence at:
+972 3697 5339 or +972 50629 8148
mediasar@mod.gov.il


Major Liebovitz from the Israeli Navy at:
+ 972 5 781 86248

###
The Free Gaza Movement, a human rights group, sent two boats to Gaza in
August 2008. These were the first international boats to land in the port
in 41 years. Since August, four more voyages were successful, taking
Parliamentarians, human rights workers, and other dignitaries to witness
the effects of Israel's draconian policies on the civilians of Gaza.

For further information on this and all aspects of the assault on Gaza, see:
http://www.FreeGaza.org


 

 

 

 

 

Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, Al-Mezan Center (Gaza) and the Palestinian Medical Relief Society (Ramallah)


Emergency Gaza Update 28.12.2008 (Sunday)

 

  • The health system in Gaza is in a state of collapse

  • A medical supplies store was bombarded today

  • Referrals to medical care outside the Gaza strip are suspended

 

Since the start of the Israeli military strikes against the Gaza Strip, true to Sunday, 16:00, 282 dead (including 20 children and 9 women) and about 700 wounded persons (including 130 children and 28 women) have been identified by Gaza hospitals, including more than 100 seriously wounded.

 

According to local estimates, dozens are defined missing, presumed to be trapped beneath destroyed buildings. The Palestinian ministry of health in Gaza claims that the number of dead is even higher. The Gaza health system is in a state of collapse and cannot provide an adequate response to the growing needs. The closure imposed by Israel on all Gaza crossings, including the total closure of Erez Crossing since last Friday, prevents the evacuation of patients and wounded persons and deepens the human tragedy occurring in the Gaza Strip.

Governmental hospitals full to overflowing


Hospitals in Gaza cannot deal with the heavy load of injured people continuing to arrive since Saturday, and today as well. In the two main hospitals in the Gaza Strip there is a shortage of beds, despite the fact that all wards were evacuated in order to admit wounded people. As a result, wounded people are filling the corridors of the hospitals. The endless flow of new wounded and the need for beds has led to a suspension of care for dozens of other patients, including cancer patients, cardiac patients and other chronically ill patients. These were sent to their homes for the duration of the crisis.

Shifaa’ hospital


According to Dr. Hassan Khalaf, director general of the hospital, true to Sunday at 13:30, 240 wounded people had been admitted to the hospital and the numbers of wounded were continuing to rise hourly. The majority of injuries were a result of direct hits, of shrapnel and of shock waves, caused by bombardments from the Israeli air force and buildings collapsing on top of their inhabitants.


The hospital has operated in emergency mode since Saturday, and its 12 operating rooms have been working 24 hours a day, with all medical teams on site. The heavy overload of wounded and the shortage of operating rooms led to the use of four of the wards in the obstetrics departments as general surgical rooms, and the hospital has stopped admitting women for deliveries. The outpatient clinics in the hospital, and four Intensive Care Units in the burns department of the hospitals are now being used for hospitalization of the wounded from the Israeli attacks.

The European hospital in Khan Younis


According to Dr. Zaki Zakzouk, a senior oncologist in the hospital, 30 seriously wounded people are hospitalized there. Most of them are suffering from head and neck wounds and are in urgent need of complex neurosurgical procedures. All these need a pulmonary intensive care unit, but due to the severe shortage of beds in the department, only half are connected to ventilating machines, and others are ventilated manually. There is also a shortage of type O minus blood. A shortage of refrigeration rooms and of ambulances is preventing transfer of blood from Shifaa’ hospital.

Nationalisation of private medical centers
 

As part of the attempt to deal with the emergency, private clinics including ‘Almamdawi’, the Red Cross clinic and others, have stopped their regular activities and are now functioning as hospitalization units for the wounded, to which governmental hospitals are now referring patients.


Damage to medical equipment stores


Today, 28.12.08, the largest medicines and medical supplies store of the ministry of health in Gaza was bombarded. It mainly serves Shifaa hospital. The store, located next to the Falastin football stadium was completely destroyed and a large amount of medical supplies was destroyed.

Referrals out of Gaza suspended


Erez Crossing has been hermetically closed since the morning of Friday 26.12.2008, and the soldiers have been evacuated from the crossing. Physicians for Human Rights-Israel has been informed that the authorities at the crossing would no longer be handling applications for transfer of patients and wounded persons to medical care outside Gaza, including urgent and lifesaving cases. This information was confirmed by representatives of the Palestinian Subcommittee for medical referrals, who told us that their attempts to coordinate passage or even communicate with Erez Crossing authorities had failed.


Of the hundreds of wounded, PHR-Israel has the full details of 25, all of whom are suffering from serious injuries and must be urgently referred to external advanced medical centers: 14 of these are unconscious in the ICU at Shifaa hospital and are in immediate danger of their lives. Seven others suffer severe orthopedic injuries and are in danger of losing limbs. Four others suffer from internal injuries. All tried to apply to Erez crossing for permission to exit Gaza and all failed so far.
Jordan has declared its willingness to admit wounded people, but in order to access Jordan, patients must receive an exit permit from the Israeli authorities to exit via Erez Crossing.

Rafah crossing


Despite the declaration of the Egyptian government according to which it would open Rafah crossing to the wounded, no wounded people have been evacuated via this crossing, for several reasons:


· Political disconnection between the Hamas government in Gaza and the Egyptian Government due to the Israeli attacks prevent proper coordination between Egypt and Hamas. Egypt claims that Hamas is preventing the passage of patients to Egypt through Rafah.
· The severity of the cases: dozens of wounded people are not transferred to Egypt due to the severity of their condition. The majority of these are head injuries and internal injuries. Most are unconscious and are in need of artificial ventilation and a medical team to accompany them on ambulances to advanced medical centers in Cairo, a six hour journey from the Rafah Crossing, Doctors in Gaza fear that many of the wounded may not survive the journey.
· Shortage of ambulances: As already reported by PHR-Israel in detail on 22.12.08, only half of Gaza’s 58 ambulances are functional. The remaining ambulances are working full time since Saturday and cannot be spared.

The Israeli military is issuing threats to civilians


Many patients have phoned PHR-Israel over the past 24 hours, reporting that during the night they had received recorded threats over the telephone. The first recorded message ordered them to leave their homes due planned bombardments. The second message warned that anyone aiding militants or hiding arms would be exposed to bombardments.

Appeals for humanitarian assistance


Today Israel enabled the opening of Kerem Shalom crossing for entry of some humanitarian goods. However, according to the Palestinian ministry of health in Gaza, these supplies are not sufficient. Due to the severe shortage of medical supplies and medicines (105 sorts of medicine, 225 types of medical items and 93 types of laboratory supplies are missing), as detailed by PHR-Israel on 22.12.08, PHR-Israel and PMRS today received an urgent appeal from the Gaza Ministry of Health for transfer of medical supplies.

 

Among the supplies asked for are basic sterilization equipment, clothing for medical teams, needles, dressings, anaesthetics, catheters, medical gases, oxygen, monitors and medicines. The overall value of necessary supplies requested from PHR-Israel is half a million US dollars. PHR-Israel is working to find funding sources and to coordinate transfer of the supplies. PMRS has initiated an emergency call to support First aid, ambulances services, Individual relief and rehabitation of injured people the call is for $1 million

Summary


The current attack found the health system in Gaza in a state of near-collapse due to the blockade imposed upon it for the past year and a half, as well as previous closures. Even before this crisis the system was working in a severely restricted manner. Now it must handle wounded people who are in need of complex care by expert professionals, which in the current situation it cannot provide.

Targeting of civilians and/of medical facilities is a breach of international humanitarian law. The targets chosen by the Israeli military include also clearly civilian installations.

As occupying power currently in effective control of the area, Israel, which is currently carrying out a massive military operation in the Gaza Strip, must bear responsibility for the wounded of the attack, enable their access to hospitals able to care for them, respect medical neutrality of related facilities and allow entry of all necessary medical supplies for hospitals to be able to handle the wounded people.

For further details contact:
Ran Yaron, PHR-Israel, 0547 577696 ranyaron [AT] phr [DOT] org [DOT] il
Bahia Amra, Palestinian Medical Relief Society, 0599407847 bahiaamra [AT] hotmail [DOT] com
Mahmoud Abu Rahma, Al Mezan Gaza, 0599609310, mahmoud [AT] mezan [DOT] org

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 


From: DCI/PS [AT] dci-pal [DOT] org
Monday, December 29, 2008


Gaza under attack: over 300 killed and 1,400 injured

[RAMALLAH, 29 December 2008] – Latest media and NGO reports suggest that the death toll in Gaza since the attacks commenced on Saturday has risen to at least 310, and that the number of people injured could be as high as 1,400, of which 180 are in a critical condition. Present indications are that 30 children have been killed and 150 injured, many critically.

DCI-Palestine fieldworkers are currently doing their best to investigate incidents involving child casualties, which are likely to rise as children represent 56 per cent of the population in Gaza.

To make matters worse the Gaza-based organisation Al-Mezan reports that the first strike "coincided with the change in schools' shifts when tens of thousands of schoolchildren were on their way from or to school" [Al-Mezan, 28 December 2008]. This fact should reasonably have been known to those who planned and carried out the attack. In a further sign of Israel’s reckless disregard for its obligations as Occupying Power and the requirements of the laws of war, seven students from an UNRWA school died in an Israeli air strike while they were waiting for a bus to take them home.

Although official Israeli spokespersons have repeatedly stated during the course of the last two days that the airstrikes are targeting Hamas infrastructure, current estimates are that many civilians have been killed and injured. Further, there is no suggestion that the policemen that were targeted are those responsible for firing rockets into Israel.

The latest attack on Gaza must be viewed in context. Israel imposed a harsh blockade on Gaza in June 2007 precipitating a humanitarian disaster. The stranglehold on the population of 1.5 million was further tightened on 5 November 2008. The situation has since deteriorated to the point where UNRWA is no longer able to distribute food in Gaza to 750,000 refugees. Further, Israel previously launched a devastating full scale military offensive into Gaza in February and March 2008, in an operation the Israeli authorities codenamed ‘Warm Winter’. That operation killed 120 people, including 33 children.

Under well established principles of international law, Israel is not permitted to collectively punish the entire civilian population for the actions of a few militants. Further, it is a well established principle of international law that any military response must be proportionate. Since January 2008, around four Israeli civilians have been killed by rocket fire from Gaza, two of those deaths occurring after Israel launched its most recent attack on Saturday. It is not in question that the firing of rockets from Gaza into Israeli civilian areas is illegal. However, during the same period, approximately 700 Gazans have been killed in Israeli attacks, a ratio of 175:1.
 
Latest reports indicate that Israel is now preparing for a ground offensive into the densely populated Gaza Strip that will inevitably involve high civilian casualties. An Israeli military spokesperson told the BBC yesterday that this latest military operation could be lengthy, and would only come to an end when the rocket fire from Gaza was "minimised"; this is to be determined through operational assessments and suggests that Israel has no immediate intention of ending the carnage.

DCI-Palestine wishes to remind the international community and Israel that personal criminal responsibility attaches to grave breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and that there is no time limitation on when these prosecutions may be initiated. All parties to the Convention have a legal obligation to prosecute such offences.

This year marks the 41st anniversary of Israel’s military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

DCI-Palestine calls upon:
The UN Security Council to call a second emergency session to:


Implement effective measures in order to ensure an immediate cessation of the current violence; and:
  
Implementation of effective measures to compel Israel to comply with previous resolutions of the Security Council and end its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
 
EU institutions and member states to make effective use of the European Union Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict (2003, 15634/03) and European Union Guidelines on promoting compliance with international humanitarian law (2005/C 327/04) to ensure Israel complies with international child protection standards and international humanitarian law, and consider the adoption of immediate restrictive measures and sanctions, as well as cessation of all upgrade dialogue with Israel.
 
The High Contracting Parties to the Geneva Conventions to fulfill their obligation under common Article 1 to ensure respect for the provisions of the Conventions, taking appropriate measures to compel Israel to abide by its obligations under international humanitarian law, in particular placing pivotal importance on the respect and protection of civilians from the effects of the hostilities.
 


Copyright © 2008 DCI/PS. All rights reserved.

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions is based in Jerusalem and has chapters in the United Kingdom and the United States.

Please visit our websites:
www.icahd.org
www.icahduk.org
www.icahdusa.org

ICAHD UK


Email: info@icahduk.org

www.icahduk.org

 

 

 


 

 

 

CLINICIANS' TOUR NOVEMBER 2008

 

TO THE WEST BANK, PALESTINE

AND PART OF ISRAEL

 

A PERSONAL REPORT

BY THELMA AND BRIAN ROBINSON

 

 

HERE

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Clinicians' Tour November 2008

 

Notes and images from

 

a day-long visit to

 

HEBRON

 

 

HERE

 


 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                  See  www.bricup.org.uk
 

 


 

 

 

The link to a copy I've made of this video is below

 

 

 

 

 


Clinicians' Tour of West Bank and part of Israel,

November 2008
 


This was the video that, along with the PowerPoint presentation, Gerard Horton of Defence for Children International - Palestine Section showed us, in Ramallah and had pretty tough hardened doctors used to seeing everything on the wards and A&E depts weeping openly. I took the above stills from the video.

I've reduced the dimensions of the video greatly to make for easier downloading, but the whole video is included. I've also reformatted to that it's playable with Quicktime or on an iPod (or iTunes) - but it could play on other software too.

What we didn't know when watching it, but which it's simplest if I tell you now, is that the boy, Rakan, was shot dead at a checkpoint some time after the video was made. Rakan had approached the checkpoint waving an imitation gun. DCI/PS who knew him very well indeed think that he actually committed suicide in this way. If you can watch the video you will see that this is a most likely explanation.

Important note: For some reason I don't understand if you watch the video on the file-sharing site as it opens, it plays only about 7 minutes. Assuming you want to download about 84 megabytes (the original was nearly 700!), it's best therefore to click DOWNLOAD and view from your hard drive.

It lasts just over 18 minutes

The link to the video is:-

http://www.4shared.com/file/76837383/5d5d1bb9/DCI-PS_video_smaller_reformat.html

 

which is:

http://tinyurl.com/9ywl2v

 

 

Brian

 

 

 


 

 

From the London Review of Books

 

LRB
1 January 2009
If Gaza falls . . .
Sara Roy

 


 

" . . . On 5 November the Israeli government sealed all the ways into and out of Gaza. Food, medicine, fuel, parts for water and sanitation systems, fertiliser, plastic sheeting, phones, paper, glue, shoes and even teacups are no longer getting through in sufficient quantities or at all. According to Oxfam only 137 trucks of food were allowed into Gaza in November. This means that an average of 4.6 trucks per day entered the strip compared to an average of 123 in October this year and 564 in December 2005. The two main food providers in Gaza are the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) and the World Food Programme (WFP). UNRWA alone feeds approximately 750,000 people in Gaza, and requires 15 trucks of food daily to do so. Between 5 November and 30 November, only 23 trucks arrived, around 6 per cent of the total needed; during the week of 30 November it received 12 trucks, or 11 per cent of what was required. There were three days in November when UNRWA ran out of food, with the result that on each of these days 20,000 people were unable to receive their scheduled supply. According to John Ging, the director of UNRWA in Gaza, most of the people who get food aid are entirely dependent on it. On 18 December UNRWA suspended all food distribution for both emergency and regular programmes because of the blockade. . . . "

 

Article HERE

 

 

 



 

 

Physicians for Human Rights-Israel Update 22.12.2008

 

 
PHR-Israel delegation to the Gaza Strip, 18-19 December, 2008-12-22
Gaza siege results in 300% increase in burn cases in the burns department at Shifaa’ hospital in the Gaza Strip
Denial of access to healthcare continues
PHR-Israel and the Palestinian Medical Relief Society (PMRS) issue a joint protest following the expulsion of UN Special Rapporteur Falk. http://www.phr.org.il/phr/files/articlefile_1230045569593.doc

 
18-19 December, 2008-12-22
 The visit was held in order to learn about the current condition of the health system, to provide medical services in Gaza hospitals, and to plan for future delegations on the basis of medical needs.
 
 Medical assistance and meetings:
 
The delegation brought with it medical equipment to a value of 25 thousand US dollars, including prosthetic limbs, and transferred them to the European Hospital in Khan Younis.
Dr. Mustafa Yassin, an expert orthopedic oncologist from Rabin Medical Center (Hasharon Campus) in Israel, examined 25 patients at the European Hospital. Several of these were recommended for a knee replacement, which will be carried out by Dr. Yassin on his next visit to Gaza.


The delegation met with representatives of the local Ministry of Health and heard an update on the current situation, as well as a review of 2008, whose main contents follow:
 According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health (MoH) in Gaza, 155,478 patients were admitted to the 14 hospitals and medical centers operating within the Gaza Strip. Some 49,000 surgical procedures were held, and 35,276 hospital births were recorded. According to statistics prepared by the “Institute for Palestinian Studies” for 2008, birthrates increased by 2.6% in comparison to 2007. The total budget of the Ministry of Health allocated to medical treatments for 2008 was 21 million US dollars.

 
 The most common conditions treated in medical centers of the MoH in Gaza in 2008 were oncology diseases, liver and kidney conditions, joint diseases and arteriosclerosis.
 
 According to Gaza MoH statistics for 2008, the number of cancer cases diagnosed this year was 520, of whom 91 were children. Breast cancer and cancer of the brain and other nervous systems were the most common types of cancer. 620 cardiac cases were registered, of whom 99 were children. 342 kidney patients are currently treated by hemodialysis. 3,199 cases of Hepatitis A were recorded, 496 of Hepatitis B, and 196 of Hepatitis C.
 
 A shortage of 105 types of medicines, or one quarter of the medications ordered by the MoH in Gaza has characterized the majority of 2008. 30 of these are for lifesaving treatments, 21 for cancer, kidney and liver conditions. In addition, a total of 220 parts and equipment items defined as necessary for surgical procedures and for maintenance of Intensive Care Units are lacking. Several milk sterilization instruments in pediatric departments have stopped functioning.
 
 The Ministry of Health in Gaza operates 58 emergency vehicles for medical evacuation. Half of these were put out of service due to lack of spare parts (engine oil, batteries, internal seats and upholstery, electrical and medical equipment). As a result the MoH purchased 64 substandard alternative vehicles, which were used for patient transfer. Many ambulances are currently still out of service and some patients are transferred in private vehicles.
 
 In emergencies, the evacuation services suffer from substandard communications due to the collapse of the two cellular systems in Gaza: Jawwal and Mirs. As a result, ambulance drivers meet difficulties in communicating with headquarters, with hospitals, with each other and with the patients’ families. This can lead to severe delays and even to loss of lives. The proposed solution is an internal communications system for the evacuation system in Gaza, estimated costs of which are 170,000 US dollars, a sum currently unavailable to the Gaza MoH.
 
 There is a severe shortage of several types of gases that are necessary for the fu