ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1353

Integrating Collection of Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity and Physical Function Scores into an Academic Rheumatology Practice to Improve Quality of Care

Vladimir Chernitskiy1, Andre DeVito2, Naama Neeman2, Niraj Sehgal2, Jinoos Yazdany3 and Andrew J. Gross3, 1Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 3Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, Electronic Health Record, quality improvement and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The default design of our institutions’ electronic health record (EHR)(Epic Systems) was not optimally structured to systematically collect quality metrics for rheumatic disease management such as disease activity and physical function measures. Our goal was to implement a Quality Improvement (QI) program for care of patients with RA that could easily be incorporated into routine clinical practice. By optimizing EHR technology to provide relevant and timely data analysis reports, we hypothesized that we would create reproducible, actionable population management solutions for providers caring for patients with RA. 

Methods: With the assistance of information technology (IT) technicians at our institution, we created “documentation flowsheets” in our EHR with the following fields: Patient Global Activity score, Provider Global Activity Score, Tender Joint count, Swollen Joint count, and ESR.  This allowed the automatic calculation of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) as well as DAS28-ESR. Providers and clinic staff collaborated to enter data into flowsheets for each RA patient visit. Provider could review scores in real time for individual patients and track scores over time in a flowsheet. Data was collected and analyzed on a monthly basis for individual providers as well as the entire practice and was disseminated to the Rheumatology faculty with full transparency.

Results: Over the first six months of data collection for this project we observed continuous improvement in all RA documentation metrics. There was steady improvement in documentation of disease activity measures.  CDAI scores were documented in 80.9% of visits 6 months into this project, compared to 56.5% of visits at study initiation. Patient global assessment was documented in 85.4% of visits vs. 68.5% at baseline. DAS28-ESR scores were documented at a lower frequency, 40.4%, due to lack of availability of ESR results to physicians at the time of the patient visit, but rates improved compared to the start of the study (21.7%).

In the final month of data collection, among RA patients with documented disease activity, 54.1% had CDAI scores of ≤10.0 indicating low level of disease or remission, where as 19.4% had high levels of disease activity (CDAI >22).  We could not determine if there was an overall improvement in RA disease activity level in our patients over the six months of data collection due to large variation in distributions of patient disease activity from month to month.

Conclusion: Effective implementation of an RA QI Program is challenging but achievable. In addition to technical tools and having the right personnel involved (e.g. physician champions, IT programmers and report writers, analysts and clinic manager and clinic support staff), successful implementation requires strong buy-in from providers. This can be accelerated by objective documentation and analysis to identify areas needing improvement, and then providing this feedback to providers. In the future we plan to assess whether systematic documentation of disease activity can lead to improved patient outcomes.


Disclosure:

V. Chernitskiy,
None;

A. DeVito,
None;

N. Neeman,
None;

N. Sehgal,
None;

J. Yazdany,
None;

A. J. Gross,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/integrating-collection-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-disease-activity-and-physical-function-scores-into-an-academic-rheumatology-practice-to-improve-quality-of-care/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at abstracts@rheumatology.org.

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology