Stockdill Tells Us He Is A Bastard

Stockdill Tells Us He Is A Bastard -- Literally...

Well, No Surprises There, Victoria.

Enjoy!

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum
----------------------------------------------------

""Roy Stockdill"" <roy.st...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:44E33982.21081.3BF6F3@localhost...

> Thought I would post the following, just to show that hypocrisy certainly
> does not reign here entirely. I am a current living person (though my
> wife says she sometimes has her doubts!).
>
> I was born on 4th July 1940 at 217 Horton Lane, Bradford, Yorkshire. In
> fact, though the address on my birth certificate looks like a private
> home, it was in fact St Luke's Hospital where probably half the
> population of the city of Bradford was born in those days. However, up
> to about 1927/8 it had formerly been the Bradford Union Workhouse and
> for donkeys years afterwards the local registrars apparently thought
> there was some kind of stigma attached to it, thus they only put the
> street address. You see, there was absurd over-sensitivity even in those
> days.
>
> My father was Leonard Stockdill, an engineer's clerk at the time who
> later became a publican. My mother was Molly Midgley and they weren't
> married when I came along because my dad was still legally married to,
> though separated from, his first wife.
>
> My birth wasn't actually registered until the following January 1941,
> which meant my parents technically committed a criminal offence, since
> births are supposed to be registered within 42 days. However, there was
> a war on and I expect they were too busy to think about it. They
> eventually married in the October of 1942 when my father's divorce had
> come through.
>
> So I was born illegitimate in a former workhouse, my parents committed
> an offence by registering my birth outside the permitted time and they
> weren't married until some two years and three months after I was born.
>
> Why should I worry about telling the world this? Oh - and, BTW, anyone
> thinking of ripping off my bank account now that they know my mother's
> maiden name would be wasting their time because I don't use it as the
> password.
>
> There - why some people feel that having such knowledge made public
> is an invasion of their privacy will remain a bit of a mystery to me, I'm
> afraid. But there are lots of sensitive little souls around, I suppose.

Perhaps that is why he is so interested in Genealogy -- particularly the
more mundane aspects thereof.

Bastards & Homosexuals Seem To Have A Particular Affinity For Genealogy...

For Quite Obvious Reasons.

Oh, the irony!
--

Julian Richards

www.richardsuk.f9.co.uk
Website of "Robot Wars" middleweight "Broadsword IV"

THIS MESSAGE WAS POSTED FROM SOC.HISTORY.MEDIEVAL

Bastards & Homosexuals Seem To Have A Particular Affinity For Genealogy...

For Quite Obvious Reasons.

It really is SO ignorant to reply to your own posts - you really are
so stupid aren't you?

I expect your father must have been SO dissappointed

The son of Admiral Wellington T Hines (war hero and pioneer of carrier
based
operations in the US Navy) Baby David's career was all mapped out for
him:
Yale, Officer Training - he was being groomed for a top slot at the
Pentagon.

But as with many great men, the son rarely lives up to expectations.

He was relieved for 'cause' on two separate occasions while serving in
the
United States Navy, the first being while assigned to Naval Security
Group
Activity Misawa, Japan, the second while assigned to CINCPAC's Intel
Division on Oahu.

The latter incident got him reassigned to Pearl Harbor here he assumed
the duties as housing officer, quite a demotion for one whose career
had such glowing promise as a junior officer.

Never endearing, and forever the outcast, this "pompous nautical ass"
laboured hard and doggedly for his promotions up to the rank of
Commander, but he ran into the 'eye of the storm' when he tried to
pull one tantrum after another in disagreement with a very sage
Captain who would go on to become Commander, U.S.Naval Security Group
Command!

He was yanked from his operational duties on the first occasion, and
appointed XO simply for the convenience of being under close scrutiny
by the C.O, and in a position less harassing to the other 700+ members
of the command.

This was NOT a promotion.

He served only as XO while the paperwork for his transfer made it
through
the bureaucratic chain back in Washington. That didn't take all that
long,
and before anyone knew it, D. Spencer Hines and his marvellous wife
(how
she's put up with him for all these years must remain one of the
world's
greatest mysteries), had departed Northern Honshu for the Hawaiian
Islands.

It's one thing to butt heads with a Captain, but when told to cool
your jets by a four-star and you still stand your ground, most wise
men
know that their careers will, at that very moment, gain great
momentum and a natural phenomenon of tailspins that have continued to
this
day!

In summary, in the words of a fellow officer who served with him:

" D Spencer Hines is one of the most arrogant jackasses to ever breath
and
walk upon the face of earth. He hadn't a clue what leadership was all
about,
and in the face of intelligence evaluation, he would always ask for a
point
paper when one's analysis varied from his - and that was often the
case.

"A towering man, of bulk and arrogance, this red headed barbarian is
not worth the grey hairs many of your constituents seem to be letting
themselves in for.

"He is his father's son, but nothing like his father, but rather, more
a quasi-nautical south seas jester at this stage in life whose open
sores apparently continue to ooze and your group are the swabs being
used to absorb all that ails this sick man during his transition to
senior citizenship!"

--
Peter

D Spencer Hines est a deficio miles militis quod stultus

Who can forget The Professionals in which Ralph Bellamy calls Lee Marvin

"you bastard"

And Marvin replies

“Yes sir…in my case, an accident of birth.
But you, you're a self-made man.”)

Both Leonardo Da Vinci and Alexander Hamilton were bastards

So were Bernardo O'Higgins and Desiderius Erasmus.

And Abe Lincoln's Mother

Vince

Well, Stockdill admits he is a bastard.

How many other bastards do we have in these groups?

Step Forward And Tell Us All About It.

Particularly those in SGB and SGM.

It Will Be Good For Your Souls.

Bastards seem to have a particular affinity for Genealogy -- looking for
their ancestors in order to restore some Personal Sense of Legitimacy.

Homosexuals, including Lesbians of course, ALSO have a particular attraction
to Genealogy. Often they realize they will never have any DESCENDANTS -- so
they look BACK to ANCESTORS for personal validation and affirmation.

DSH

Exitus Acta Probat

"Vince" <fir...@firelaw.us> wrote in message
news:S_KdnQV6U4l__X7Z...@comcast.com...

Were you dropped on your head as a baby?

Disgusting! The foregoing scurrilous screed about D. Spencer Hines by
"Peter" is so personal, so meanspirited, and so out of line, it makes me
sympathize with DSH. "Peter" might want to think about that before telling
us more than we want to know about anybody else.

Oh, yeah: *PLONK!*

Grey Satterfield

> "Peter" is so personal, so mean-spirited, and so out of line, it makes me

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you kindly, Grey.

It's also a complete load of ash, trash, codswallop and lies.

"Peter" -- who is a notorious sock puppet -- just likes to retail said
lies -- he's not capable of doing any useful, substantive posting on his
own.

Please recall I only reported what Roy Stockdill reported about HIMSELF. I
don't post lies about people.

This is the sort of abuse I'm used to -- because I use my Real Name.

"Peter" is far too cowardly to use HIS Real Name.

New Subject:

What are your considered opinions about the Administrations of Dwight David
Eisenhower and John Fitzgerald Kennedy?

Successes & Failures -- Strengths & Weaknesses. Comparisons & Contrasts.
Ranking As Presidents?

DSH

Vires et Honor

A number of points, which I suppose may be rather superfluous now taht
you've killfiled me (assuming of course you actaully know what "plonk"
means and you haven't buggered off for a quart of electric soup):

1. What I posted above (and what you apparently found so objectionable
you failked to snip any of it) has been posted many times, on many
NG's
2. The halfwit Hines has never contradicted any of it.
3. People that live in glasshouses (or Hawaii) shouldn't throw stones.
4. I wait your rebuttal of the points made. However I shan't hold my
breath

I agree with you, Grey. OTOH I don't think "Peter's" comment will faze DSH
any more than would a mosquito bite. And, yes, it is in very bad form to
gossip on Usenet about people's offline activities, especially since I make
up my own mind about a person's character and don't depend on other's second
hand ca-ca throwing.

- nilita

OK, areswipe, what, exactly, is" ash, trash, codswallop and lies"?
What is not factual about my post?

Are you not:

Is the following untrue? (I seem to remeber you claim membership of
some Yale drinking establishment

We can all see the following is probaly true - is it?

Do tell, is the following assertion incorrect?

Houseboats I assume - or weren't you appointed housing officer in
Pearl Harbor?

Someone obviously knows you and your history, or did they make up the
following?

Were you?

Never mind

Perhaps you could tell us who you served with - I'm sure any officer
who described you as below could hardly fail to remember - we could
ask about, help you with some doubtless pinful memories - best get
them out of you tink mind etc.

Now I'm quite prepared to accept you are bald, but did tyou have red
hair?

--
Peter

Aah, there speaks an expert

Aah, but is it your real name?

So, if "Peter" isn't my real name, pray, do tell, what is my real
name? - I would be most interested to know, as it would contradict
what is shown on my birth certificate.

They were all better men than you

Contrasts. Ranking as a US navy housing officer?

<s>

It was more then we needed to hear wan't it? It wasn't new
information was it? It wasn't likely to improve anything, was it?
I guess that makes it a petty, mean deed. It's possible that, if
there were feweer PMDs in this world we'd have fewer WMDs as a
consequence.

Peter Skelton

Who, apart from an uptight repressed bore like yourself, actually
cares?

Assholes are assholes. I am usually patient and cut most Usenet posters a
lot of slack but I draw the line at attacks that are so detailed and
personal, they are creepy. Yuck!

OK, rant mode exited.

I think that Eisenhower's administration was significantly superior to
JFK's. He got the Interstate Highway system started, a system for which I
give thanks every time I drive to see my daughter in Springfield, IL or my
son in Jackson, TN. Ike was also a brilliant administrator, which nobody
knew about for years after his presidency. He probably was the best
president of the postwar period, after Truman and Reagan.

Kennedy's idolaters have had a reverse impact on me; I can't see that the
man did much of historic significance, if anything, during his nearly three
years in office. His Pulitzer Prize for "Profiles in Courage," which was
ghostwritten by Ted Sorenson, doesn't improve his standing in my estimation
much either. As we have discussed, he screwed up the Bay of Pigs situation
royally and narrowly avoided disaster during the Cuban Missile Crises. That
said, he wasn't a terrible president as he did create an era of good feeling
domestically and presided over a much needed tax cut. I would give his
presidency about a C.

Grey Satterfield

[long and disgusting anti-DSH screed snipped.]

I am far from a DSH apologist, God knows! There have been times when he
might have said with reason that he was one of my favorite whipping boys.
Nevertheless, the nasty, anonymous Peter's post REALLY turned me off. There
should be limits -- even on Usenet -- and Peter far exceeded them.

Spencer's weakness can also be his strength and nobody ever questioned his
courage or ability to stick to his rhetorical guns. So I agree, Peter's
post will not modify Spencer's conduct -- good or bad -- one iota. And this
time that's all right

Grey Satterfield

The significance of Kennedy's presidency was that he was the
first of his generation to rise to the post. He, like Reagan, was
a positive symbol. They were symbols for different things, and
quite dissimillar in other ways but it's an interesting point.

Peter Skelton

Yep, it's pretty bad when it is so far out of line it causes me to rise to
DSH's defense (not that he really needs defending).

Grey Satterfield

This is true. It's easy to forget at this late date that when Kennedy was
elected his Irish Catholicism was a very big deal; but he won anyway. Like
Reagan, JFK was an incredibly handsome, charming man who had a gorgeous
wife, to boot. That's what I meant about JFK having created an era of good
feeling. It really did make up for a lot of his failings in other areas.

Grey Satterfield

I'm genuinely puzzled.

1. I'm not annonymous - Peter is my real name, my surname can
doubtelss be found by means of Google and my email address
2. What sort of limits would you like to see applied to Usenet posts?
Should they be be limits that met your particular sensibilities?
Should such limits change as you sensibilities change? Please do tell.

Hines is so far gone that I don't expect anyone could change his
conduct - least od all me - but perhaps he will become the subject of
such ridicuile that he will stop polluting SGB (and many other NG's
apparently)
--
Cheers

Peter

Please remove the invalid to reply

Peter wrote:

So, you admit to deliberately ridiculing DSH personal reputation for the
purpose of intimidating and terrorizing DSH into forgoing his right to
exercise free speech.

Hines is the author of his reputation - I make no claim whatsoever for
it - it's all his own work

Hines is welcome to excercise his right to free speech, no problem
with that at all.

Do I think he should post the drivel he does - perhaps not, but
certainly not to SGB - it's all off topic.

Basically, if he's upset about it he has some choices, stop posting or
modify his ubnacceptable behaviour.

I note that you, along with a number of others, feel that my posting
about Hines was wrong - fair enough, that is your opinion and you must
be free the express it. However, I note that you (and the others)
don't refute any of what was written - even Hines managed only to call
them lies. I've asked him to contradict what was written - he has
every right to. I somehow suspect though that we will never have a
rebuttal from him as I'm sure he knows that doubtless many ex naval
colleagues will enter the debate - how do you think that would go? I
think Hines knows.

Needs defending, or is worth defending? He isn't IMO. My
objections had nothing to do with protecting DSH.

Peter Skelton

Peter wrote:

Your actions speak louder than your words. You have admitted to using
personal attacks upon the personal reputation of the messenger to
suppress the message rather than attacking only the message and the
conduct. We do not need to refute your personal accusations regardless
of whether or not they have any merit. They are none of our business and
none of your business. If you make it your business, you will be
behaving like a poisonous old woman gossip spreading around falsehoods
along with whatever half truths there may or may not be. The next time
you think you know enough to use such gossip as a cudgel, you should
take notice of how it will impact your own reputation for honesty and
credibility. In one example, there is the case of a U.S. Naval
intelligence officer at Pearl Harbor who displeased his superior officer
and was banished from intelligence work to command a drydock in
California. His name was Joseph J. Rochefort, the U.S. naval
intelligence officer responsible for providing Nimitz with the
information needed to ambuh the Japanese fleet at the Battle of Midway.

Oh, I know that Peter was not trying to defend DSH. My point was that DSH
is going to do what DSH wants to do, no matter what anyone says about him,
in his defense or otherwise. This, of course is as much of an indictment as
it is a defense.

Grey Satterfield

Big deal. So was William the Conqueror, as you are forever reminding us.

I suppose you come under this category, eh?

"D. Spencer Hines" <pogue...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:irHEg.173$M14....@eagle.america.net...

> Enjoy!

I found it creepy too. "Peter" comes across to me as a stalker. -- Q

DSH

news:C108EFE1.2F33B%gsatte...@cox.net...

I think that's spot on.

Jackson, Tennessee is probably a very interesting town. I drove close to it
on my way to Shiloh a few years ago. Any particular notable Historical
Sites nearby?

Springfield, Illinois is, of course Abraham Lincoln's home town. Your kids
live in interesting places.

I think that's quite correct too.

Eisenhower has not had as many scribblers writing about him as has Kennedy.

But he was an excellent President, much underestimated at the time. I'd
rank him much closer to Truman and perhaps even above Truman. The survey I
posted had Truman as #7 and Eisenhower as #8.

Truman and ACHESON *together* made a Great Team, just as Nixon and Kissinger
did.

Fred Greenstein's _The Hidden-Hand Presidency: Eisenhower as Leader_ is one
of the best books about Ike as President.

"Some books, like some scientific theories, have the capacity to alter
people's whole way of looking at the world. Such a book is The Hidden-Hand
Presidency. To read it is to discover, among other things, that everything
you ever believed about Dwight Eisenhower as president of the United States
is wrong." -- Economist

"A fascinating exposition of Eisenhower's leadership techniques." --
Political Science Quarterly

"An important corrective to standard treatments of Ike as president." --
Journal of Politics

"A deliberately circumscribed book, but the sharp focus serves its
intellectual intensity." -- National Review

"By his painstaking analysis, Greenstein should convince even the most
unrelenting critic of Eisenhower's that the man had greater skills as Chief
Executive than have been recognized." -- New Republic

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0801849012/sr=1-1/qid=1155785027/ref=sr_1_1/002-1090110-1204016?ie=UTF8&s=books>

However, only a VERY ignorant pogue or poguette would think that ALL folks
who are interested in Genealogy are Homosexuals, Lesbians or Bastards.

Yes, it would take a Truly Stupid Person to believe that.

But there seem to be quite a few of them here.

How Sweet It Is!

DSH

Fortem Posce Animum

Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum

[.]

In defense of Peter, abusive military leaders are detested by their
subordinates, peers, and superiors alike. They are because they do a great
deal of harm within their commands and discredit to their service. I can't
say that is the case here, but it sounds like Peter believes it is. It would
not be unlike finding a schoolyard bully you knew when young pontificating
or moralizing in older age. -the Troll

Well, I have no doubt that Hines has "issues". But, I like your
explanation, Hippo-troll, that he has some kind of personality disorder.
I'm suspectin' that Hines is exactly the same IRL as he is on Usenet, that
he is not projecting some kind of fake net persona ..%)

- nilita

> "hippo" wrote in message

You're right he can not change himself. He is confident he is right and
everyone else is wrong, fools, and or weak. For folks with no natural
empathy, personality and values are learned, but without the humanity to
temper what is learned, if that makes sense. Form without substance may be a
better way to put it. It isn't his fault or a disorder, but rather a
personality type, which in an extreme form, creates a very difficult person
to live and work with.

I know a man like him. He can't understand why he has a 200+% annual
turnover in personnel and puts it down to lazy and incompetent workers. It
doesn't occur to him that it's wrong to send a 65 year old female office
worker on a seven block walk each way in summer heat to get his shirts out
of the laundry. I'd have fired any manager of mine who pulled a stunt like
that and they knew it. -the Troll

Hines has never sent a 65-year-old female office worker on a seven-block
walk each way in summer heat to get his shirts out of the laundry -- or even
a 25-year-old female office worker.

"Hippo" has slipped his leash again and is just venting his spleen -- some
frustrations in his own life no doubt.

Sad...

Of course, "Hippo" hides behind a pseudonym -- in order to throw rocks
incognito.

DSH

"hippo" <hi...@south-sudan.net> wrote in message
news:12e81g6...@corp.supernews.com...

>>"Peter" is so personal, so meanspirited, and so out of line, it makes me

>A number of points, which I suppose may be rather superfluous now taht
>you've killfiled me (assuming of course you actaully know what "plonk"
>means and you haven't buggered off for a quart of electric soup):
>
>1. What I posted above (and what you apparently found so objectionable
>you failked to snip any of it) has been posted many times, on many
>NG's
>2. The halfwit Hines has never contradicted any of it.
>3. People that live in glasshouses (or Hawaii) shouldn't throw stones.
>4. I wait your rebuttal of the points made. However I shan't hold my
>breath

Perhaps it would be useful to remind people (including Grey) how this
started.

Roy Stockdill posted some information about the circumstances of his
birth on soc.genealogy.britain. It was certainly a relevant post in
that forum and he was making a point that was relevant to an ongoing
discussion there.

One statement in that post, "So I was born illegitimate," was taken by
D. Spencer Hines and changed into the message header "Stockdill Tells
Us He Is A Bastard."

Note the snide change from the adjective "illegitimate" to the
name-calling noun "a bastard," a word with far more negative
connotations than just "illegitimate."

Note also the fact that Hines posted his new message with the abusive
header to a large number of groups where it is of no relevance
whatsoever:

alt.books.tom-clancy (of all places), alt.history.british,
sci.military.naval, soc.history.medieval, soc.history.war.misc,
us.military.army

Note also the snide and abusive content of Hines's first messages
(which he silently snipped when he protested against Peter's post):

and

Note how the homophobic Hines extended his attack to comprise both
"Bastards & Homosexuals."

Hines removed those self-incriminating lines and pleaded:

But he wasn't innocently reporting, he was maliciously spreading
gossip across Usenet. He was taking a person's honest admission and
gloatingly turning it into an accusation.

He deserves no sympathy.

Tish

--
Doug
"D. Spencer Hines" <pogue...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:KNHEg.176$M14....@eagle.america.net...

--
Doug
"Peter" <usenet...@nidum.plus.com> wrote in message
news:2rn6e21fi7edmsqm7...@4ax.com...

> It really is SO ignorant to reply to your own posts - you really are
> so stupid aren't you?
>
> I expect your father must have been SO dissappointed
>
> The son of Admiral Wellington T Hines (war hero and pioneer of carrier
> based
> operations in the US Navy) Baby David's career was all mapped out for
> him:
> Yale, Officer Training - he was being groomed for a top slot at the
> Pentagon.
>
>
> But as with many great men, the son rarely lives up to expectations.
>
>
> He was relieved for 'cause' on two separate occasions while serving in
> the
> United States Navy, the first being while assigned to Naval Security
> Group
> Activity Misawa, Japan, the second while assigned to CINCPAC's Intel
> Division on Oahu.
>
>
> The latter incident got him reassigned to Pearl Harbor here he assumed
> the duties as housing officer, quite a demotion for one whose career
> had such glowing promise as a junior officer.
>
>
> Never endearing, and forever the outcast, this "pompous nautical ass"
> laboured hard and doggedly for his promotions up to the rank of
> Commander, but he ran into the 'eye of the storm' when he tried to
> pull one tantrum after another in disagreement with a very sage
> Captain who would go on to become Commander, U.S.Naval Security Group
> Command!
>
>
> He was yanked from his operational duties on the first occasion, and
> appointed XO simply for the convenience of being under close scrutiny
> by the C.O, and in a position less harassing to the other 700+ members
> of the command.
>
>
> This was NOT a promotion.
>
>
> He served only as XO while the paperwork for his transfer made it
> through
> the bureaucratic chain back in Washington. That didn't take all that
> long,
> and before anyone knew it, D. Spencer Hines and his marvellous wife
> (how
> she's put up with him for all these years must remain one of the
> world's
> greatest mysteries), had departed Northern Honshu for the Hawaiian
> Islands.
>
>
> It's one thing to butt heads with a Captain, but when told to cool
> your jets by a four-star and you still stand your ground, most wise
> men
> know that their careers will, at that very moment, gain great
> momentum and a natural phenomenon of tailspins that have continued to
> this
> day!
>
>
> In summary, in the words of a fellow officer who served with him:
>
>
> " D Spencer Hines is one of the most arrogant jackasses to ever breath
> and
> walk upon the face of earth. He hadn't a clue what leadership was all
> about,
> and in the face of intelligence evaluation, he would always ask for a
> point
> paper when one's analysis varied from his - and that was often the
> case.
>
>
> "A towering man, of bulk and arrogance, this red headed barbarian is
> not worth the grey hairs many of your constituents seem to be letting
> themselves in for.
>
>
> "He is his father's son, but nothing like his father, but rather, more
> a quasi-nautical south seas jester at this stage in life whose open
> sores apparently continue to ooze and your group are the swabs being

> --
> Peter
>
> D Spencer Hines est a deficio miles militis quod stultus

[.]

[.]

No, instead you indulge yourself in personal attacks on, and insults to,
everyone within range on Usenet and break its posting conventions. This guy
routinely, and publicly, insults his employees for minor infractions, when
the 'rule book' clearly says to praise in public and criticize in
private. -the Troll

If I didn't know better, I would suspect that hippo was making the moral
equivalency argument here. :)

Grey Satterfield

Hines gets sent to the Penalty Box! And Peter can return to play. He has
done his time.

- nilita

My thanks to Leticia for explaining how all of this started. It was pretty
bad but comes as no surprise because in the years that I have been observing
Spencer being Spencer there isn't a whole lot, if anything, he could do that
would surprise me.

Despite Spencer's frequent excesses, Peter's detailed and shockingly
personal recounting of Spencer's career as a naval officer turned me off --
profoundly. If there is anybody who might deserve such treatment it would
be D. Spencer Hines, but not even Spencer deserves that, it seems to me.

As the Senate Counsel, Joseph Welch famously said to Senator Joe McCarthy in
the 1954 Army-McCarthy hearings, "Have you no sense of decency, sir at long
last? Have you no sense of decency?" I would also ask if Peter has any
sense of decency.

Grey Satterfield

You know? I've seen that story - and variations thereof - posted by
different people at different times. It's to the point that each new time
it comes down the pike, I say to myself ... "oops; Hines offended somebody
big time AGAIN, and here comes his biography!"

- nilita

I hope one of the addresses find you. Atlantis has been cleared for a
4:30 PM launch on August 27th, pending an inspection on some short
bolts holding an antenna and a heater on a hydralic unit.

For you and your fisherman a look at the lures de jour in Florida:

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/custom/adventure/orl-adventure1706aug17,0,3786494.story?coll=orl-rush-headlines

[Hines]

And he is generally right.

He would do well as a TV competitor of O'Reilly, who also
is generally (but not as universally as Hines) right.

Doug McDonald

Big Daddy told me that there were some repairs needed that might delay the
launch. btw, he will be there on that date no doubt emailing me real time
up close and personal photos. Much to his consternation, I'm not keen on
making a quick trip down there for the event (which occurs around my
birthday) when I've got lots to do up in Canuckistan. 'sides which until
the current airline kerfuffle settles down, I prefer to be earthbound!

OMG, that's funny! Batman action figures .. :) The fish would have to
fight me for the gummy bears, though! Big Daddy's fishing gear is always
packed in his trunk in case he ever wants to drop a line! Last time he went
fishing, a shark popped up out of the water and stole his catch! And his
little dog almost got eaten by an alligator ... heheheh ...

Jack, I'm gonna try emailing you from my sooper seekrit home addy .... stand
by ...

- nilita

We may share a birthday, mines the 29th, daughter's the 26th. I was out
on my pier the other day dipping water for the Marine Resources Council
continuing study of the Indian-Banana Rivers when one of the fisherman
there actually caught something big enough to see without a magnifying
glass. He caught two ray-like fish about 12-15 inches across on the
same cast. If they were Southern Stingrays they are supposed to
indicate game fish like Permit and Bonefish, I doubt it in this
context.

Please put something on the subject line of your e-mail that will let
me know it is from you. I have a triage security system since I lost at
least one load of data to spyware.

My birthday's the 30th! Way cool. We could'a partied together!

I just did apply to get past your security system. I hope you get it. If
not, you can try emailing me at the above addy deleting NOSPAM ... IOW ...
nilit...@yahoo.com

There is also DSH's home address that gets posted on occasion,
presumably to help the North Koreans with their missile targeting.
--

Julian Richards

www.richardsuk.f9.co.uk
Website of "Robot Wars" middleweight "Broadsword IV"

THIS MESSAGE WAS POSTED FROM SOC.HISTORY.MEDIEVAL

Being Right far too often does tend to infuriate some people.

But it's perennially amusing to see how they run in circles and bite their
tails when flummoxed.

You have my respect as the Real Chemist here and the model Harvard Graduate
of skill, intelligence, savoir-faire and a tactile, discriminating sense of
Judgment and Good Taste.

You are also the Model Texan -- a Man of Integrity, True Grit and Fortitude,
but certainly no blowhard.

Most folks don't know all that, because you are modest and don't post as
often as do many who are your inferiors.

For the record, "Peter" is not a Real Person but merely a sock puppet.

DSH

"Doug McDonald" <mcdonald@SnPoAM_scs.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:ec1sha$pqj$1...@news.ks.uiuc.edu...

Suuuure .....

There are some people who say Ann Coulter is always right, and others who
say that Michael Moore right.

Sez more about the "complimenters" than the objects of their adoration.

- nilita

Hilarious!

Hines can't even get his word order correct.

He meant to write
Being Far Right too often does tend to infuriate some people.

Oh Gawd ... I hope Doug is being as sick as the rest of us ..........

Twit.

Surreyman

tsk

you meant to write

"Being too far Right often does tend to infuriate some people.

Vince

I said nothing of the sort.

Take Reading Comprehension 101 again.

Note OFTEN -- NOT always, in what I wrote below -- and don't try to put your
words in my mouth or anyone else's.

You are quite capable of choking on them yourself.

John 5:14

DSH

Deus Vult

<nibb...@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1155799566.7...@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

> Renia wrote:

>> > DSH
>
> Unfortunately, for DSH, this assertion that homosexuals and lesbians
> are incapable of having children is not only factually incorrect, but
> is an ignorant but widely held misconception (to pardon the pun).

> in article "hippo" wrote:

[.]

You need to put yourself in the place of old Peter, given the temptation.
:^) -the Troll

> Hines gets sent to the Penalty Box! And Peter can return to play. He has
> done his time.

I like this referee arrangement. :^) -the Troll

"Hippo" has been fooled, euchred and flummoxed.

Great Entertainment!

DSH

news:12e9ovb...@corp.supernews.com...

> "Peter" is not a Real Person but merely a little sock puppet.

He's pretty articulate for a bit of yarn and felt. -the Troll

- nilita

"Hippo" has been fooled, euchred and flummoxed -- and doesn't even realize
it.

Great Entertainment!

DSH

Even hippo, whose judgment is usually quite good, isn't right all the time.
:)

Grey Satterfield

That's true. But Hippo gains extra points for his thoughts in this thread
...%)

- nilita

> "hippo" wrote in message

You're not supposed to enjoy it. Shame on you. You're the ref. -the Troll

:>
:>Grey Satterfield
:
:
:A number of points, which I suppose may be rather superfluous now taht
:you've killfiled me (assuming of course you actaully know what "plonk"
:means and you haven't buggered off for a quart of electric soup):

Grey's been around longer than you have, Petey.

:1. What I posted above (and what you apparently found so objectionable
:you failked to snip any of it) has been posted many times, on many
:NG's

You say that as if it means something. The fact that you weren't the
first (and no doubt aren't the last) to echo it is irrelevant.

:2. The halfwit Hines has never contradicted any of it.

You say that as if it means something. Failure to contradict idiocy
is hardly concurrence with same.

:3. People that live in glasshouses (or Hawaii) shouldn't throw stones.

People named Petey should piss into the wind.

:4. I wait your rebuttal of the points made. However I shan't hold my
:breath

Too bad about that. The world would be a better place if you did.

--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson

:Basically, if he's upset about it he has some choices, stop posting or
:modify his ubnacceptable behaviour.

That won't happen, you dumbass. All you do is add to the noise. Do
what most sane people have done and killfile the twit.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

As is every post by the failure Hines himself. If he wishes to avoid the
simple truth's being posted, then he can either stop slagging off other
people or, preferably, just stop posting at all.

--
Eve McLaughlin

Author of the McLaughlin Guides for family historians
Secretary Bucks Genealogical Society

Yes, that's just as true today as when I first wrote it.

DSH

Vires et Honor

McLaughlin does so LOVE to slip her cheap, commercial messages into every
post she makes.

McLaughlin ought to always come to the back door -- the tradesmen's
entrance -- whenever she appears for business.

DSH

"Eve McLaughlin" <e...@varneys.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bBMsoIAx...@varneys.demon.co.uk...