Vampire squished?
What is bad for Goldman is bad for Wall Street, but good for regulatory reformers
WHEN he was a child, Warren Buffett had an awe-inspiring encounter with Sidney Weinberg, Goldman Sachs's legendary leader, sparking a lifelong affection for the bank. These days the super-investor's admiration for Wall Street's most powerful firm, cemented by an investment during the recent crisis, puts him in a minority—and one that shrank further when, on April 16th, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused Goldman and one of its employees of fraudulently misrepresenting structured instruments tied to subprime mortgages. The civil charges have dented the firm's aura of invincibility, sent shivers across Wall Street and possibly (and perhaps not coincidentally) changed the calculus of regulatory reform.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Vampire squished?"
More from Finance & economics
Immigration is surging, with big economic consequences
The West faces an unprecedented number of new arrivals
Japan will struggle to rescue its plummeting currency
Expensive government intervention looks likely to provide only brief respite
The UAE is using a wealth fund to gain diplomatic sway
And to build holiday resorts