Iranian Leader, Calling Introductory Remarks Insulting, Addresses Columbia

IranMahmoud Ahmadinejad speaking this afternoon at Columbia University’s Roone Arledge Auditorium. (Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Updated, 3:04 p.m. | President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran completed his appearance by thanking his audience. “I ask Almighty God to assist all of us to work hand in hand for a future filled with peace, justice and brotherhood,” he said. “Best of luck to all of you.”

John H. Coatsworth, the acting dean of Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs, said he regretted that Mr. Ahmadinejad did not have time to answer all the questions from the audience (and did not fully answer some of the questions that were asked). Then he thanked the Iranian president, and the audience.

3:03 p.m. | The final question from the audience was: What would it take for Iran to engage in talks with the United States or the West? Mr. Ahmadinejad did not give a direct response, but spoke in general terms. He concluded this way: “If the U.S. government recognizes the rights of the Iranian people, respects all nations and extends a hand of friendship to all Iranians, they will see that Iranians will be among their best friends.”

He added that Columbia’s faculty members were “officially invited” to come to Iran to speak — to which the audience gave a rousing round of applause. “You are welcome to choose any university in Iran,” he said. “We’ll give you the platform, we’ll respect you 100 percent, we will have our students sit and listen to what you have to say.”

2:59 p.m. | Mr. Ahmadinejad insisted that Iran’s nuclear program was not intended at the development of weapons. He maintained — without providing evidence — that inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency had “verified our activities are for peaceful purposes.” However, he said, some “two or three” world powers want to “monopolize all science or knowledge” and “they expect the Iranian nation to turn to others for fuel, science and knowledge that are indigenous to itself” and “to humble itself.”

He asked of the United States: “If you have created the fifth generation of atomic bombs and tested them already, what position are you in to question the peaceful purposes of others who want nuclear power? We don’t believe in nuclear weapons, period. It goes against the whole grain of humanity.”

He added that politicians interested in nuclear weapons “are backward, retarded.”

2:53 p.m. | Asked what he hoped to achieve when he expressed a desire to visit the World Trade Center site in Lower Manhattan, Mr. Ahmadinejad said he wanted to “show my respect.”

He added: “Regretfully, some groups had very strong reactions, very bad reactions. It’s bad to prevent someone from showing sympathy to the families of the victims of the 9/11 event, a tragic event.” He added that he was puzzled when told that some viewed his desire to visit ground zero as an insult. “This is my way of showing my respect,” he said. “Why would you think that?”

2:51 p.m. | In response to a question about the treatment of homosexuals in Iran, Mr. Ahmadinejad was initially evasive, instead talking about the death penalty, which, he pointed out, exists in the United States. “People who violate the laws by using guns, creating insecurity selling guns, distributing guns at a high level are sentenced to execution in Iran,” he said. “Very few of these punishments are carried out in the public eye.”

Pressed by Dean Coatsworth on the original question about the rights of gay men and lesbians in Iran, Mr. Ahmadinejad said: “In Iran, we don’t have homosexuals like in your country. We don’t have that in our country.”

The audience booed and hissed loudly. Some laughed, uncomfortably.

“In Iran, we do not have this phenomenon,” Mr. Ahmadinejad continued, undeterred. “I do not know who has told you that we have it. But as for women, maybe you think that maybe being a woman is a crime. It’s not a crime to be a woman. Women are the best creatures created by God. They represent the kindness, the beauty that God instills in them. Women are respected in Iran.”

2:46 p.m. | The third and fourth questions concerned the Holocaust and the rights of women in Iranian society.

Mr. Ahmadinejad said that the Holocaust should not be closed off to academic inquiry just as scientific fields continue to merit research.

On the issue of women’s rights, Mr. Ahmadinejad said, “Women in Iran enjoy the highest levels of freedom,” but he did not offer many specifics, other than citing several examples of women in high levels of government.

2:43 p.m. | Mr. Ahmadinejad, in response to a second question from the audience, denied that his country sponsors terrorism, but he did not offer specifics.

“We need to address the root causes of terrorism and eradicate those root causes,” he said, adding that in the Middle East, “It’s clear what powers incite terrorists, support them, fund them.”

He added:

Our nation, the Iranian nation, through history, has always extended a hand of friendship to other nations. We’re a cultured nation. We don’t need to resort to terrorism. We’ve been victims of terrorism ourselves. It’s regrettable that people who argued they are fighting terrorism — instead of supporting the Iranian nation — are supporting the terrorists and then turn the finger at us. This is most regrettable.

Updated, 2:36 p.m. | Mr. Ahmadinejad just took the first question from the audience: Does he still call for the destruction of the State of Israel?

He declined to answer directly, but began his answer by saying, “We love all nations. We love the Jewish people. There are many Jews living in Iran, with peace and security.”

Instead, he turned his remarks again to the issue of Palestinian self-determination.

John H. Coatsworth, the acting dean of Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs, challenged Mr. Ahmadinejad to give a straight-up “yes or no” answer to the question of Israel.

Mr. Ahmadinejad retorted that he was being asked to give a certain answers. Where’s the free expression in that? he asked. He called for a “free referendum” in Palestine. “Let the people of Palestine freely chose what they want for their future,” he said.

2:35 p.m. | Mr. Ahmadinejad concluded his speech by defending his country’s nuclear program. He said Iran once had contracts with American, French, German and Canadian contractors to provide nuclear energy.

“Unilaterally each and everyone of them canceled their contracts with us as a result of which the Iranian people had to pay the heavy cost in billions of dollars,” he said. “Why do we need the fuel from you? You’ve not even given us spare aircraft parts that we do need for civilian aircraft, under the name of embargo and sanctions under the pretext that we are against human rights and freedom. We want the right to self-determination, to be independent.”

Mr. Ahmadinejad concluded his speech thus: “We are a peace-loving nation. We love all nations.”

2:31 p.m. | Mr. Ahmadinejad took up the issues of Israel and the Holocaust, among the most explosive issues he has discussed. He said:

You know that my main job is as a university instructor. Right now, as president of Iran, I still continue teaching graduate and Ph.D.-level courses on a weekly basis. My students are working with me in scientific fields. I believe that I am an academic myself, so I speak to you from an academic point of view. And I raise two questions. But instead of a response, I got a wave of insults and allegations against me. And regretfully, they came mostly from groups who claimed most to believe in the freedom of speech and of information.

You know quite well that Palestine is an old wound –- as old as 60 years. For 60 years, these people are displaced. For 60 years, they are being killed. For 60 years, on a daily basis there’s conflict and terror, for 60 years, innocent women and children are destroyed and killed by helicopters and airplanes that rake the houses over their heads. Children in schools are being tortured, for 60 years, the slogan of expansionism, from the Nile to the Euphrates, has been chanted.

Given that the Holocaust is a present reality of our time, a history that occurred, why is there not sufficient research that can approach the topic from different perspectives?

Interestingly, Mr. Ahmadinejad did not call the Holocaust a “myth,” as he has in the past, but instead argued that the Palestinians were paying the price for other people’s crimes:

We need to still question whether the Palestinian people should be paying for it or not. After all, it happened in Europe. The Palestinian people had no role in it. Why is it that the Palestinian people are paying the price for an event they had nothing to do with?

They had no role to play in World War II. They were living with the Jewish and Christian communities in peace at the time. They didn’t have any problems. Today, too, Jews, Christians and Muslims live in brotherhood in many parts of the world. Why is it that Palestinians should pay a price -– innocent Palestinians -– for five million people to remain displaced and refugees abroad, for 60 years? Is this not a crime? Is asking about these crimes a crime in itself? Why should an academic like myself face insults for asking questions like this?

2:23 p.m. | In his most pointed arguments yet, Mr. Ahmadinejad said that science and research had been used in the West as tools of oppression.

“They even violate individual and social freedoms in their own nations under that pretext,” he said. “They do not respect the privacy of their own people. They tap telephone calls … They create an insecure psychological atmosphere, in order to justify their war-mongering acts in different parts of the world.”

He added: “By using precise scientific methods and planning, they begin their onslaught on the domestic cultures of nations, which are the result of thousands of years of interaction, creativity and artistic activity. They try to eliminate these cultures in order to strip people of their identity.”

He said that Western science was often used to instill “intimidation” and values of “mere consumption” and “submission to oppressive powers.”

He also added, “Making nuclear, chemical and biological bombs and weapons of mass destruction is yet another result of the misuse of science and research by the big powers.” (Pointedly, Mr. Ahmadinejad did not speak to his own country’s uranium enrichment program.)

“Without the cooperation of certain scientists and scholars, we would not have witnessed production of different nuclear, chemical and biological weapons,” Mr. Ahmadinejad said. “Are these weapons to protect global security? What can a perpetual nuclear umbrella achieve for the sake of humanity? If nuclear war is waged between nuclear powers, what human catastrophe will take place?”

2:18 p.m. | Mr. Ahmadinejad has been making an argument about science, but not one grounded in the Western empirical tradition. “In the teachings of the prophets, one reality shall always be attached to science: the reality of purity of spirit and good behavior,” he said. “Knowledge and wisdom are pure and clear reality. Science is a light.” He added that “only a pure researcher” free from “superstition, selfishness, material trappings” can discover that reality.

The protests outside, on the Columbia campus, have been largely quiet during the duration of Mr. Ahmadinejad’s speech inside Lerner Hall. Hundreds of students are sitting quietly, watching a live television simulcast on the southeast lawn of the campus, in front of Butler Library.

2:13 p.m. | Mr. Ahmadinejad has devoted his talk so far to arguing that God is the source of knowledge. The Almighty is the ultimate “teacher of human beings, who taught human beings what they are ignorant of,” he said, adding that the Prophet Muhammad was “appointed as their prophet to ‘read for them the divine verses, and purify them from ideological and ethical contamination.’ ”

It was the wisdom of the prophets, from Abraham to Muhammad, that “delivered humans from ignorance” and from “corrupted ways of thinking,” he added.

2:10 p.m. | Mr. Ahmadinejad spoke about the importance of scholarship, but did not address Mr. Bollinger’s criticism of the Iranian regime’s crackdown on academics in Iran.

“The key to understanding the realities around us rests in the hands of researchers: those who seek to discover areas that are hidden,” Mr. Ahmadinejad said. “The unknown sciences, the windows of reality they can open, is only done through the efforts of scholars and learned people in this world.”

Without the instinct for learning and knowledge, he said, “Humans would have always remained stranded in ignorance and would never have discovered how to improve the life we are given.”

2:07 p.m. | Mr. Ahmadinejad began his speech by reciting verses from the Koran in Arabic. Addressing Dean Coatsworth and the audience, he said he was grateful to God for the opportunity to speak in an academic environment.

Mr. Ahmadinejad began: “At the outset, I want to complain a bit about the person who read this political statement against me. In Iran, tradition requires that when we invite a person to be a speaker, we actually respect our students and the professors by allowing them to make their own judgment and we don’t think it’s necessary before the speech is even given to come in with a series of claims…”

The room erupted in applause.

Mr. Ahmadinejad added: “…and to attempt to provide a vaccination of sorts to our faculty and students. The text, more than addressing me, was an insult to the audience here. In a university environment, we must allow people to speak their mind, to allow everyone to talk, so that the truth is eventually revealed by all.”

2:04 p.m. | “Today I feel all the weight of the modern civilized world yearning to express the revulsion at what you stand for,” Mr. Bollinger told Mr. Ahmadinejad. “I only wish I could do better.”

The auditorium erupted in thunderous applause.

2 p.m. | In the style of a relentless cross-examination, Mr. Bollinger confronted Mr. Ahmadinejad over his statements about wiping Israel “off the face of the map” and on allegations that Iran has provided financing and support to terrorist groups.

“Why do you support well-documented terrorist organizations that continue to strike at peace and democracy in the Middle East, destroying lives and the civil society of the region?” he asked.

Mr. Bollinger, finally, confronted Iran about its aid to Shiite militias in Iraq and about its nuclear buildup.

“You continue to defy the world body” by claiming peaceful intent in a nuclear program while the world expresses concern about Iran’s military aims, Mr. Bollinger said.

Mr. Bollinger concluded: “Frankly, and in all candor Mr. President, I doubt that you will have the intellectual courage to answer these questions, but your avoiding them will in itself be meaningful to us. I do expect you to exhibit the fanatical mind-set that characterizes what you say and do.”

He added that he believed Mr. Ahmadinejad’s failure to provide answers would only undermine the hard-line regime’s power in Iran.

1:56 p.m. | Mr. Bollinger asked Mr. Ahmadinejad: “Mr. President, you exhibit all the signs of a petty and cruel dictator, and so I ask you, and so I ask you, why have women, members of the Baha’i faith, homosexuals and so many of our academic colleagues become targets of persecution in your country?”

He asked whether Mr. Ahmadinejad was using a nuclear confrontation with the West to distract from his incompetent leadership at home. He also asked to be allowed to lead a delegation of scholars to Iran to speak freely, as Mr. Ahmadinejad can do today.

He confronted Mr. Ahmadinejad over his description of the Holocaust as “a fabricated legend,” calling him either “brazenly provocative or astonishingly uneducated.” He called Columbia a world center of Jewish studies that since the 1930s has provided a home for Jewish refugees. He called the Holocaust “the most documented event in human history.”

1:53 p.m. | In a speech notable for its forcefulness, Mr. Bollinger just confronted Mr. Ahmadinejad on the crackdown of Iran’s scholars and intellectuals. He asserted that Iran had a poor human rights record and that “Iran leads the world in executing minors.” He also spoke of a “wider crackdown” on student activists, including the jailing and forced retirement of scholars.

1:48 p.m. | Lee C. Bollinger, Columbia’s president, just took the stage. “If today proves anything, it will be that there is an enormous amount of work ahead of us,” he said, referring to the “critical and complex” role of Iran in world geopolitics.

In a remarkable and wide-ranging talk, with Mr. Ahmadinejad sitting just feet from him, Mr. Bollinger gave a passionate defense of free speech.

Mr. Bollinger said that since 2003, the World Leaders Forum had been a “major forum for robust debate” on global issues. “It should never be thought that merely to listen to ideas we deplore” implies an endorsement of those ideas or a naïveté about the potential dangers of those ideas, he said.

“To those who believe that this event should never have happened, that it is inappropriate for the university to conduct such an event, I want to say that I understand your perspective and respect it as reasonable.” He said, “It is an experiment, as all life is an experiment.” He added, “This is the right thing to do and indeed, it is required by the existing norms of free speech, of Columbia University” and of academic institutions.

He added that he regretted if people were hurt by the speech, and he called for the “intellectual and emotional courage” to “confront the mind of evil.”

As academic institutions, he added, “We cannot make war or peace. We can only make minds.”

1:44 p.m. | After a short delay, the event has just begun. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the president of Iran, took his seat in the Roone Arledge Auditorium.

John H. Coatsworth, acting dean of the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia, told the audience to turn off their cellphones and reminded the crowd that flash photography was prohibited. He said that audience members may leave but would not be allowed by the Secret Service to reenter.

“We have today an extraordinary opportunity to directly engage the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Mr. Coatsworth said.

He urged the audience to display “civility and restraint.”

1:31 p.m. | Hundreds of students have gathered on the southeast lawn of the Columbia University campus in Morningside Heights, where the university has set up a live telecast of the speech by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, who is scheduled to speak shortly, at 1:30 p.m.

This campus has been sharply divided on whether Mr. Ahmadinejad should even be allowed to speak here.

“I feel most people do not understand Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s ideology,” said Chris Jo, 20, a junior from San Diego. “Why shouldn’t he be allowed to speak on campus?” Mr. Jo said that he supported the decision by Columbia’s president, Lee C. Bollinger, to allow Mr. Ahmadinejad to speak, and added that he believed most students were energized by the news. “I think everyone’s secretly excited that he’s here, even if they’re opposed to it,” Mr. Jo said.

Rabbi Charles E. Savenor, an associate dean at the Jewish Theological Seminary and a student at Columbia’s Teachers College, had a very different point of view.

“This isn’t just a matter of free speech, it’s a matter of hate speech,” Rabbi Savenor said. He said that Mr. Ahmadinejad was taking advantage of the kind of academic freedom that is denied in Iran, noting that last year, Mr. Ahmadinejad hosted an academic conference that primarily consisted of scholars denying the Holocaust happened. “He’s one-sided,” Rabbi Savenor said.

Despite his opposition to the speech, Rabbi Savenor said, “We can’t ignore what he has to say.” He called Mr. Ahmadinejad a dangerous figure, likening him to Adolf Hitler in the 1930s. “This is 1938 all over again,” Rabbi Savenor said.

For many Columbia students, this is likely to be the most exciting event of the school year.

Many, like Jessica Garcia, 20, said they skipped class to listen to what they believed would be an historic event. “I support Columbia for bringing him here,” said Ms. Garcia, a junior from Queens, who said she was missing a physics class to listen to the event on the southeast lawn. “It’s a forum. It’s not like Columbia is endorsing him. He’s the president of a nation and should be allowed to speak.”

The 600 tickets for the event were given away quickly late last week and so many journalists have asked to cover the event that Columbia officials set aside a large room in the Columbia Journalism School building for journalists who could not fit in to the Roone Arledge Auditorium at Lerner Hall, where Mr. Ahmadinejad will speak.

Ramin Mehdizadeh, 30, been in the United States for a year as a student in architecture at Columbia. (Previously, he had been denied a visa to do research at Harvard.) He and a group of fellow Iranian students gathered on the main steps at Columbia University, holding signs like “Ahmadinejad is not Iran like Bush is not America.”

“We appreciate the invitation at Columbia,” he said. Mr. Mehdizadeh said he did not support Mr. Ahmadinejad, but did support free speech at the university. As far as the threat of military action against Iran, he says, “It’s our problem. We have to solve it.”

Negar Mortazavi, 25, is getting her master’s at Brandeis University and is currently doing an internship in development at the United Nations. She has been in the United States for four years.

“I don’t believe the enemy of your enemy is your friend. Pure and simple,” she said. As far as being afraid to speak out because she will have to go back to Iran, she said, “It’s not as bad as the protests at the university,” referring to the student demonstrations in Tehran several years ago.

Ms. Mortavazi said that if she could ask Mr. Ahmadinejad a question, she would ask, “Why is the economy going down the drain?” She added: “He’s here to be heard, but it’s an opportunity for him to be challenged.”

Roja Heydarpour contributed reporting.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Why shouldn’t Ahmadiejad visit the 9/11 site? Not one Iranian terrorist was on any of the planes that day ~ in fact all but one was from Saudi Arabia. Americans’ are so arrogant ~ we are not the best country in the world…we spread terror in the Middle East daily! Think about it!

From the City Room

Note to readers: This event is ending at Columbia. City Room is wrapping up our live-blog coverage of the event. Within a short time, we will post traditional-style news coverage on the home page of NYTimes.com. To read the update blog post, refresh the page in your browser or click below.

Columbia’s President Confronts Iranian Leader; Ahmadinejad Calls Remarks Insulting

Comment posters: Please be patient — moderating and approving comments takes time.

You can help by observing our established comment guidelines: avoid abusive comments, insults, ALL-CAPS, profanity and other prohibitions detailed below. Stick to the topic, today’s event. If you have complaints about our coverage or comment moderation policy, send us an e-mail message. We don’t want to bog down the comment threads with such matters. Thanks.

//www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/faq/comments.html

That was a good speech. Kept thinking how nice it is to invite him and just harass him and blast him and his ending about not being intellectual enough to answer was genious.

It’s sad that Columbia U confuses academic freedom with with common sense. Allowing the leader of a nation that is one of the biggest sponsors of terror groups in Syria, Lebanon, and elsewhere to speak on campus is akin to allowing someone like Hitler speak at Columbia.

I know that there were no Iranian terrorist on the plane, but those Iranians aligned with Ahmadiejad were happy to see one of the monuments to Western civilization come crashing down on 9/11. Spending city resources to protect this guy to lay a wreath at the Trade Center site would be a waste–as he’d lay the wreat he’d be laughing up his sleeve at us.

I don’t always think the US makes all the right moves in the Middle East or elsewhere, but it offers freedoms not offered in many other countries–like try living in Iran or in most Arab countries–you won’t think we are so arrogant.

This is not a real news story. Ahmadinejad is one of countless bad rulers who will be on tour in New York this week for the U.N. general assembly. Pretending he is a greater demagogue than he is is a bit like pretending Erich Honecker was Hitler.

“Why shouldn’t Ahmadiejad visit the 9/11 site? Not one Iranian terrorist was on any of the planes that day ~ in fact all but one was from Saudi Arabia. Americans’ are so arrogant ~ we are not the best country in the world…we spread terror in the Middle East daily! Think about it!
— Posted by IKE”

He wasn’t barred because he was Iranian, he was barred because he supports terrorism.

How do we know Iran is the sponsor of terror? Who told that? what are the evidences? They told us Iraq has nuclear and biological weapons, and the result nothing found but 1200000 (one point two million) Iraq people died after we attacked Iraq. Now the plan is attacking Iran with the help of France, Israel, probably England and Turkey. for what? nuclear weapons? or because they are Muslim and this is a crusade? or we need a new economical calm down after mortgage crisis? please think a little.

If there was any doubt about letting Ahmadinejad speak, clearly Bollinger has schooled him, no pun intended… so why worry? No matter what he follows up with, Bollinger has already embarrassed him.

Free Speech is wonderful. Columbia Univ. President did the right thing by inviting the President of Iran.

Without communications with others we disagree with results in war

It is easy to Love our friends, but hard to listen to our enemies, if one has a closed mind.

If only we asked such tough questions to our own leadership.

Bollinger really surprised a lot of people with his hard slam on Ahma-nutjob. He obviously surprised the Iranian who could only mutter his compalint at being sandbagged thusly when he was expecting the usual academic snow-job intro before launching his well-rehearsed rap consisting of his favorite themes: invoking Shia theology mixed with those ingredients calculated to appeal to a largely Liberal and clueless audience sympathetic to hearing America cast in the role of world villain.

“Allowing the leader of a nation that is one of the biggest sponsors of terror groups in Syria, Lebanon, and elsewhere to speak on campus is akin to allowing someone like Hitler speak at Columbia.”

I think there would be great interest and value in hearing Hitler speak at Columbia– and my grandmother was in a concentration camp. We don’t need to listen to people whom we agree with, we already understand their perspective. By creating an academic environment in which an “enemy” can speak, perhaps we can learn something about the rationale that makes them so controversial.

In an oblique way he’s trying to remind “the West” that the sceince of the Greeks and Indians, with the additional commentary of the Arabs and Iranians, was the cornerstone of the foundation of university education in Europe, at U. of Bologna, the Sorbonne, and Oxford. Remember that Avicenna (arabic Ibn Sina) and Averroes (Ibn Rushd) and Algebra and Euclidian Geometry were transmitted free of charge to Europe and led eventually to the Italian and Shakespearean Rennaissance era. Not like Microsoft which charges for everything.

Ike

Because you lack the intellectual intelligence to understand the reasons why it would not be a good idea why he should not be allowed to visit the twin towers, I will put it in plain words for you.

It is what he stands for that is an insult to America. He being an Iranian is not an issue.

Why shouldn’t Ahmadiejad visit the 9/11 site? Not one Iranian terrorist was on any of the planes that day ~ in fact all but one was from Saudi Arabia. Americans’ are so arrogant ~ we are not the best country in the world…we spread terror in the Middle East daily! Think about it!

* And I see protest signs reading Evil Ahmadiejad, so what would we call Bush & neo-cons

Iranian Presidents handlers, here is a tip, if he wants to goto Ground Zero, he can. Don’t worry about NYPD. They are incapable of doind anything difficult. yes they can stop an obvious motorcade of black suvs with flashing lights. But if you put him in plain clothes and stick him in a yellow cab he will be able to get there no problem or even by subway. Go in disguise and then once in front of Ground Zero, take off your disguise and have your camera guy there ready to film you. You will make the NYPD look like the fools they are. But by all means do not park illegally, then the NYPD will get you. That you cannot do, but sneaking past them is really not that difficult. The local beat cop probably will not recognize you first of all without your entourage and they dare not racially profile, so enjoy your visit there and we’ll be seeing you in a spider hole sometime soon, i suspect.

Bollinger opens by parroting lies about Ahmadinejad. I would have hoped for a more informed line of questioning.

What an embarassing bunch of foolishness this all is, and what a deplorable way for Americans to behave. Iran’s interests and those of the U.S. are asymmetric; I for one fully realize that Iran is likely to be destablizing force in the region, and especially through its support of terrorism, a threat to U.S. interests.

Nonetheless, we have once again given Mr. Ahmadinejad exactly what he wants – an opportunity to make Americans look hysterical. Treating him with the utmost class and respect would have done a lot more to further our cause and damage his than to trot him in front of a bunch of college students and refer to him as “the mind of evil.” Think of what the U.S. reaction would be (and in some cases, has been) when people have done this to Mr. Bush.

All this proves on the world stage is that we are indeed the self-righteous, scared witless giant that has perpetrated the single largest invasion of another sovereign nation to occur in this century.

We would better confront the fanaticism of people like this if we showed a little less of our own, and provided the rest of the world with a better example of the leadership an advanced industrial democracy – and the world’s sole superpower (for now) – can provide.

Why does Columbia invite someone to speak and then spend all their time insulting him? Not a good man? The world is full of bad people. By constantly insulting the man the U.S. makes him more friends at home than he had before. They see their leader insulted and like people everywhere they don’t like it. Proving once again that it takes more than an education to make an intellect. Americans are such whiney little scaredy cats anymore. And for the record, how in the hell is Iran in 2007 like Germany in 1938? Lots of rhetoric and very little fact.

thomas johannes erichsen September 24, 2007 · 2:30 pm

Hopefully, when Iran aquires nuclear weapons, Ahmadinejad has forgotten about the humiliation at Columbia Uni. But how can he?

Mr. Ahmedinejad is an enlightened person.Perhaps if it was 1967, he would have been better appreciated and respected. In today’s society of mindless reality TV, obscene consumerism, and convenience of squnder, he is seen as not intellectual enough. I feel sorry for him, I feel pity for us…

President Bollinger was brilliant. I’m proud to be a Columbia U. alumna

James,
Where do you draw that line? Who draws the line? You? It amazes me how folks can constantly talk about the greatness of our Democracy, even as they shun it’s core values.

The unfortuante thing is that Ahmadinejad will not address those issues he knows to be of great concern. The truth is not of concern to him.

Well, let’s see, for all the scorn poured on Ahmadinejad by the everyone, Iran hasn’t attacked anyone, nor has supported terrorists against the US (infact, alqaeda hates Iran).
Iran’s only crime – being muslim and trying to acheive nuclear status.

I bet if Iran was Uruguay and it was trying to develop a nuclear power plant, there wont be this trouble.
By the way, how can we (US and Israel) talk so loudly against Nuclear technology when we are sitting on the largest nuclear arsenal in history.. pure hypocracy..

Admittedly, Iran has a number of arguments against it, but it should be more suitably protested by their own people (treatment of women, freedom of religion etc.)
The nuclear argument by the heavily armed west has no legs.