Subscribe to New Scientist

Health

Feeds

Home |Health |Life | News

Couch potato lifestyle may speed up ageing

Being a couch potato in your free time could make you a decade older biologically than someone who is physically active, according to a major study of people's "chromosomal clocks".

Tim Spector at St Thomas' hospital in London, UK, and colleagues measured the lengths of telomeres - the DNA that bookends our chromosomes - in the white blood cells of 2401 twins.

Telomeres shorten each time a cell divides, and when they become too short a cell can no longer divide, so telomeres act as a kind of timer counting down our biological age.

The researchers found that people who did not exercise in their spare time had shorter telomeres than very active people.

Psychological stress

On average, the least active (getting just 16 minutes exercise a week) had telomeres 200 base pairs shorter than the most active (exercising 3 hours a week), which translates to them being about 10 years biologically older.

The team previously showed that smoking and obesity can shorten telomere length to the equivalent of 10 years. But they found that exercise and telomere length were linked independently of whether people smoked or were overweight.

Accounting for whether or not participants had a chronic disease (possibly making them sedentary) did not change the findings either, suggesting that other factors linked with an inactive lifestyle affect biological age.

One of those factors seems to be psychological stress, which could translate into oxidative stress, a source of free radicals that can cause DNA mutations and shorten telomere length.

Although exercise can alleviate such stress, it only seems to help with cellular ageing if done in people's leisure time. Slogging away in manual jobs, on the other hand, tends to have the opposite effect and can shorten telomeres because, Spector says, of "the psychological stress of being in the lower social pecking order".

Age-related diseases

Telomere length can be inherited, but even after analysing a subgroup of twin pairs, who share both genetics and upbringing, he says, "the twin who was doing more exercise had longer telomeres - on average, an 88 base pair difference".

Whether having shorter telomeres means you die younger is unproven, but you are "more likely to have age-related diseases", such as Alzheimer's, says Spector. Nevertheless, although telomere length cannot be restored, it may be possible to slow down the process by starting to exercise, "even if you'd been a slob".

David Gems, who researches ageing, at University College London, notes: "These days older folks spend more and more money on various dietary supplements in the hope of ageing more slowly, but really they would be better off keeping the money and just walking the dog more often".

Journal reference: Archives of Internal Medicine 2008 (vol 168[2], p 154)

Genetics - Keep up with the pace in our continually updated special report.

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say
Comments 1 | 2

2401 Twins?

Tue Jan 29 12:58:03 GMT 2008 by Rb-a3

Is that 2401 twins or 2401 pairs of twins? because 2401 twins makes no sense!!

2401 Twins?

Tue Jan 29 13:13:12 GMT 2008 by Dave

It makes sense. A twin is an individual. A pair of twins is two. Hence the the line saying '2401 twins' means 2401 individuals

2401 Twins?

Tue Jan 29 13:19:59 GMT 2008 by Michael Marshall, Online Editorial Assistant

Hi, it means 2401 individuals, all of whom are twins.

Twins!

Tue Jan 29 14:07:01 GMT 2008 by Cathy Kitchener

It means 2,401 PAIRS of twins. If it meant 2,401 individuals there would be an odd one left over without his twin to compare with. Incidentally, 2,401 - either pairs or individuals - is a high enough number for there to be reliable statistical evidence.

Twins!

Tue Jan 29 14:51:47 GMT 2008 by Michael Marshall, Online Editorial Assistant

No, it doesn't. :) The original paper explicitly says "We studied 2401 white twin volunteers, comprising 2152 women and 249 men". See http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/168/2/154

Twins!

Tue Jan 29 20:10:09 GMT 2008 by Simon Pop

Do you need statistical evidence to tell that they're twins? (Apart from the odd one over, that is).

Couldn't you just look at them?

Twins!

Tue Jan 29 16:28:18 GMT 2008 by Cathy Kitchener

Oh. Alright Michael. I wonder if that means 50% were paired with the other 50% - with one individual, unpaired twin, left over.

The test results would have been more meaningful if carried out on 2,401 identical twins.

Twins!

Tue Jan 29 16:54:15 GMT 2008 by Michael Marshall, Online Editorial Assistant

Yes, I was a bit befuddled myself about what happened with the 2,401st volunteer! :) I've just checked with the editor, and this is what's going on.

The results come from a very large-scale study, where all the participants were twin pairs. However, for this bit of research their first step was just to take 2,401 individuals from that dataset. So the main result, that "people who did not exercise in their spare time had shorter telomeres than very active people", was done on a sample that, for all intents and purposes, was random.

However, you could obviously say that maybe the result was confounded by genetic differences. To check that, they went back and looked at a smaller group, within the sample. For this analysis, they matched up twin pairs and were able to show that even in twin pairs, where genetics and upbringing are identical, different amounts of exercise still give different telomere lengths.

In summary, all 2,401 volunteers were twins, but only a smaller subset of those actually got directly compared to their twins in this study.

Hope that clarifies things, and sorry if I was a bit abrupt! :)

Comments 1 | 2

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

ADVERTISEMENT

Light opens up a world of sound for the deaf

Infrared light can stimulate neurons in the inner ear as precisely as sound waves, a discovery that could lead to better cochlear implants (Image: Steve Gschmeissner/SPL)

18:48 21 November 2008

Infrared light can stimulate neurons in the inner ear as precisely as sound waves, a discovery that could lead to better cochlear implants

Hairspray link to genital birth defects

17:47 21 November 2008

Pregnant hairdressers may be exposing their unborn children to harmful chemicals that can lead to health problems in boys, a study suggests

New species of Ebola found in Uganda

13:15 21 November 2008

The virus resembles no other previously discovered strains – a feature that might complicate ongoing efforts to develop a universal vaccine

Safer sex in a pill

18:00 19 November 2008

It's a risky strategy, but with an AIDS vaccine further off than ever, a pill that could stop people catching the virus has to be worth a try. Clare Wilson investigates

Latest news

Cellphone clusters give traffic jams away

15:00 22 November 2008

Mapping GPS data from mobile phones carried by vehicle occupants can help road users avoid congested areas

Remains of devoured planet discovered

14:00 22 November 2008

The dusty remains of a distant planet show what happens to a gas giant if it survives a red giant explosion

Space station's new urine recycler has glitches

22:49 21 November 2008

NASA is having problems with a new $250 million machine that recycles urine into drinking water

Bush to go out with a green bang?

The next few weeks are George W. Bush's last chance to leave a green legacy (Image: Sipa Press / Rex Features)

12:00 22 November 2008

One of the George W Bush's final acts as US president could be to create the largest marine conservation area in the world

This week's issue

Subscribe

Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine

For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist print Edition

22 November 2008

ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe to New Scientist
Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

Login for full access